1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application
  4. Volume 4, 2017
  5. Article

Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application

Volume 4, 2017

Hazard Rate Modeling of Step-Stress Experiments

Abstract

Step-stress models form an essential part of accelerated life testing procedures. Under a step-stress model, the test units are exposed to stress levels that increase at intermediate time points of the experiment. The goal is to develop statistical inference for, e.g., the mean lifetime under each stress level, targeting to the extrapolation under normal operating conditions. This is achieved through an appropriate link function that connects the stress level to the associated mean lifetime. The assumptions made about the time points of stress level change, the termination point of the experiment, the underlying lifetime distributions, the type of censoring (if present), and the way of monitoring lead to alternative models. Step-stress models can be designed for single or multiple samples. We discuss recent developments in designing and analyzing step-stress models based on hazard rates. The inference approach adopted is mainly the maximum likelihood, but Bayesian approaches are briefly discussed.

Keyword(s): accelerated life testing, censoring, cumulative exposure model, failure rate model, maximum likelihood estimation, scale family of distributions
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-statistics-060116-054214
2017-03-07
2024-05-04
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/statistics/4/1/annurev-statistics-060116-054214.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-statistics-060116-054214&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Agresti A. 2013. Categorical Data Analysis Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 3rd ed..
  2. Alhadeed AA, Yang SS. 2002. Optimal simple step-stress plan for Khamis-Higgins model. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 51:212–15 [Google Scholar]
  3. Alhadeed AA, Yang SS. 2005. Optimal simple step-stress plan for cumulative exposure model using log-normal distribution. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 54:64–68 [Google Scholar]
  4. Arnold BC, Balakrishnan N, Nagaraja HN. 1992. A First Course in Order Statistics New York: Wiley
  5. Bagdonavicius VB, Gerville-Réache L, Nikulin M. 2002. Parametric inference for step-stress models. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 51:27–31 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bagdonavicius VB, Nikulin M. 2000. On nonparametric estimation in accelerated experiments with step-stresses. Statistics 33:349–65 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bagdonavicius VB, Nikulin M. 2002. Accelerated Life Models: Modeling and Statistical Analysis Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall
  8. Bai DS, Kim MS. 1993. Optimum simple step-stress accelerated life tests for the Weibull distribution and type I censoring. Naval Res. Logist. 40:193–210 [Google Scholar]
  9. Bai DS, Kim MS, Lee SH. 1989a. Optimum simple step-stress accelerated life tests under periodic observation. J. Korean Stat. Soc. 18:125–34 [Google Scholar]
  10. Bai DS, Kim MS, Lee SH. 1989b. Optimum simple step-stress accelerated life tests with censoring. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 38:528–32 [Google Scholar]
  11. Balakrishnan N. 2009. A synthesis of exact inferential results for exponential step-stress models and associated optimal accelerated life-tests. Metrika 69:351–96 [Google Scholar]
  12. Balakrishnan N, Beutner E, Kateri M. 2009a. Order restricted inference for exponential step-stress models. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 58:132–42 [Google Scholar]
  13. Balakrishnan N, Cramer E. 2014. The Art of Progressive Censoring New York: Birkhäuser/Springer
  14. Balakrishnan N, Cramer E, Iliopoulos G. 2014. On the method of pivoting the CDF for exact confidence intervals with illustration for exponential mean under life-test with time constraints. Stat. Probab. Lett. 89:124–30 [Google Scholar]
  15. Balakrishnan N, Han D. 2009. Optimal step-stress testing for progressively type-I censored data from exponential distribution. J. Stat. Plann. Inference 139:1782–98 [Google Scholar]
  16. Balakrishnan N, Kamps U, Kateri M. 2012. A sequential order statistics approach to step-stress testing. Ann. Inst. Stat. Math. 64:303–18 [Google Scholar]
  17. Balakrishnan N, Kundu D, Ng HKT, Kannan N. 2007. Point and interval estimation for a simple step-stress model with type-II censoring. J. Qual. Technol. 39:35–47 [Google Scholar]
  18. Balakrishnan N, Xie Q. 2009a. Exact inference for a simple step-stress model with type-I hybrid censored data from the exponential distribution. J. Stat. Plann. Inference 137:3268–90 [Google Scholar]
  19. Balakrishnan N, Xie Q. 2009b. Exact inference for a simple step-stress model with type-II hybrid censored data from the exponential distribution. J. Stat. Plann. Inference 137:2543–63 [Google Scholar]
  20. Balakrishnan N, Xie Q, Kundu D. 2009b. Exact inference for a simple step-stress model from the exponential distribution under time constraint. Ann. Inst. Stat. Math. 61:251–74 [Google Scholar]
  21. Bedbur S, Kamps U, Kateri M. 2015. Meta-analysis of general step-stress experiments under repeated type-II censoring. Appl. Math. Model. 39:2261–75 [Google Scholar]
  22. Bhattacharyya GK, Soejoeti Z. 1989. A tampered failure rate model for step-stress accelerated life test. Commun. Stat. Theory Methods 18:1627–43 [Google Scholar]
  23. Bobotas P, Kateri M. 2015. The step-stress tampered failure rate model under interval monitoring. Stat. Methodol. 27:100–22 [Google Scholar]
  24. DeGroot MH, Goel PK. 1979. Bayesian estimation and optimal designs in partially accelerated life testing. Naval Res. Logist. Q. 26:223–35 [Google Scholar]
  25. Efron B, Tibshirani R. 1993. An Introduction to the Bootstrap New York: Chapman & Hall
  26. Escobar LA, Meeker WQ. 2006. A review of accelerated test models. Stat. Sci. 21:552–77 [Google Scholar]
  27. Fard N, Li C. 2009. Optimal simple step stress accelerated life test design for reliability prediction. J. Stat. Plann. Inference 139:1799–808 [Google Scholar]
  28. Ganguly A, Kundu D, Mitra S. 2015. Bayesian analysis of a simple step-stress model under Weibull lifetimes. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 64:473–85 [Google Scholar]
  29. Gerville-Réache L, Nikulin M. 2007. Some recent results on accelerated failure time models with time-varying stresses. Qual. Technol. Quant. Manag. 4:143–55 [Google Scholar]
  30. Gouno E. 2001. An inference method for temperature step-stress accelerated life testing. Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int. 17:11–18 [Google Scholar]
  31. Gouno E. 2006. Step-stress testing. Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences 13 S Kotz, N Balakrishnan, CB Read, B Vidakovic 8173–78 Hoboken, NJ: Wiley [Google Scholar]
  32. Gouno E, Balakrishnan N. 2001. Step-stress accelerated life tests. Handbook of Statistics, Vol. 20: Advances in Reliability N Balakrishnan, CR Rao 623–39 Amsterdam: Elsevier [Google Scholar]
  33. Gouno E, Sen A, Balakrishnan N. 2004. Optimal step-stress test under progressive Type-I censoring. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 53:383–93 [Google Scholar]
  34. Greven S, Bailer AJ, Kupper LL, Muller KE, Craft JL. 2004. A parametric model for studying organism fitness using step-stress experiments. Biometrics 60:793–99 [Google Scholar]
  35. Han D, Balakrishnan N, Sen A, Gouno E. 2006. Corrections on “Optimal step-stress test under progressive type-I censoring.”. IEEE Trans. Reliab 55:613–14 [Google Scholar]
  36. Han D, Kundu D. 2015. Inference for a step-stress model with competing risks for failure from the generalized exponential distribution under type-I censoring. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 64:31–43 [Google Scholar]
  37. Hirose H. 1993. Estimation of threshold stress in accelerated life-testing. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 42:650–57 [Google Scholar]
  38. Kateri M, Balakrishnan N. 2008. Inference for a simple step-stress model with type-II censoring and Weibull distributed lifetimes. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 57:616–26 [Google Scholar]
  39. Kateri M, Kamps U. 2015. Inference in step-stress models based on failure rates. Stat. Pap. 56:639–60 [Google Scholar]
  40. Kateri M, Kamps U, Balakrishnan N. 2009. A meta-analysis approach for step-stress experiments. J. Stat. Plann. Inference 139:2907–19 [Google Scholar]
  41. Kateri M, Kamps U, Balakrishnan N. 2010. Multi-sample simple step-stress experiment under time constraints. Stat. Neerlandica 64:77–96 [Google Scholar]
  42. Kateri M, Kamps U, Balakrishnan N. 2011a. Optimal allocation of change points in simple step-stress experiments under type-II censoring. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 55:236–47 [Google Scholar]
  43. Kateri M, Kamps U, Balakrishnan N. 2011b. Step-stress testing with multiple samples: the exponential case. Methods and Applications of Statistics in Engineering, Quality Control and the Physical Sciences N Balakrishnan 644–65 New York: Wiley [Google Scholar]
  44. Khamis IH. 1997. Optimum M -step, step-stress design with K stress variables. Commun. Stat. Simul. Comput. 26:1301–13 [Google Scholar]
  45. Khamis IH, Higgins JJ. 1996. Optimum 3-step step-stress tests. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 45:341–45 [Google Scholar]
  46. Khamis IH, Higgins JJ. 1998. A new model for step-stress testing. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 47:131–34 [Google Scholar]
  47. Khamis IH, Higgins JJ. 1999. An alternative to the Weibull step-stress model. Int. J. Qual. Reliab. Manag. 16:158–65 [Google Scholar]
  48. Lee J, Pan R. 2010. Analyzing step-stress accelerated life testing data using generalized linear models. IIE Trans 42:589–98 [Google Scholar]
  49. Lee J, Pan R. 2012. A GLM approach to step-stress accelerated life testing with interval censoring. J. Stat. Plann. Inference 142:810–19 [Google Scholar]
  50. Lin CT, Chou CC. 2012. Statistical inference for a lognormal step-stress model with type-I censoring. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 61:361–77 [Google Scholar]
  51. Madi MT. 1993. Multiple step-stress accelerated life test: The tampered failure rate model. Commun. Stat. Theory Methods 22:2631–39 [Google Scholar]
  52. McSorley EO, Lu JC, Li CS. 2002. Performance of parameter-estimates in step-stress accelerated life-tests with various sample-sizes. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 512:271–77 [Google Scholar]
  53. Meeker WQ, Escobar LA. 1998. Statistical Methods for Reliability Data New York: Wiley
  54. Meeter CA, Meeker WQ. 1994. Optimum accelerated life tests with a nonconstant scale parameter. Technometrics 36:71–83 [Google Scholar]
  55. Miller RW, Nelson WB. 1983. Optimum simple step-stress plans for accelerated life testing. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 32:59–65 [Google Scholar]
  56. Nelson W. 1980. Accelerated life testing—step-stress model and data analysis. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 29:103–8 [Google Scholar]
  57. Nelson WB. 1990. Accelerated Testing: Statistical Models, Test Plans and Data Analyses New York: Wiley
  58. Rao BR. 1992. Equivalence of the tampered random variable and the tampered failure rate models in accelerated lifetesting for a class of life distributions having the “setting the clock back to zero property.”. Commun. Stat. Theory Methods 21:647–64 [Google Scholar]
  59. Sedyakin NM. 1966. On one physical principle in reliability theory. Tech. Cybern. 3:80–87 [Google Scholar]
  60. Seo SK, Yum BJ. 1991. Accelerated life test plans under intermittent inspection and type-I censoring: the case of Weibull failure distribution. Naval Res. Logist. 38:1–22 [Google Scholar]
  61. Sha N, Pan R. 2014. Bayesian analysis for step-stress accelerated life testing using Weibull proportional hazard model. Stat. Pap. 55:715–26 [Google Scholar]
  62. Srivastava PW, Shukla R. 2008. A log-logistic step-stress model. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 57:431–34 [Google Scholar]
  63. Tang Y, Guan Q, Xu P, Xu H. 2012. Optimum design for type-I step-stress accelerated life tests of two-parameter Weibull distributions. Commun. Stat. Theory Methods 41:3862–77 [Google Scholar]
  64. Teng SL, Yeo KP. 2002. A least-squares approach to analyzing life-stress relationship in step-stress accelerated life tests. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 51:177–82 [Google Scholar]
  65. Tsai TR, Chen HH, Lu W. 2008. The inspection of acceptance sampling for step-stress tests with an equally-spaced interval censoring scheme. Int. J. Reliab. Qual. Saf. Eng. 15:203–15 [Google Scholar]
  66. van Dorp JR, Mazzuchi TA. 2004. A general Bayes exponential inference model for accelerated life testing. J. Stat. Plann. Inference 119:55–74 [Google Scholar]
  67. van Dorp JR, Mazzuchi TA. 2005. A general Bayes Weibull inference model for accelerated life testing. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 90:140–47 [Google Scholar]
  68. van Dorp JR, Mazzuchi TA, Fornell GE, Pollock LR. 1996. A Bayes approach to step-stress accelerated life testing. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 45:491–98 [Google Scholar]
  69. Wang B. 2006. Unbiased estimations for the exponential distribution based on step-stress accelerated life-testing data. Appl. Math. Comput. 173:1227–37 [Google Scholar]
  70. Wang BX, Yu K. 2009. Optimum plan for step-stress model with progressive type-II censoring. TEST 18:115–35 [Google Scholar]
  71. Wang R, Fei H. 2004. Conditions for the coincidence of the TFR, TRV and CE models. Stat. Papers 45:393–412 [Google Scholar]
  72. Watkins AJ. 2001. Commentary: inference in simple step-stress models. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 50:36–37 [Google Scholar]
  73. Wu SJ, Lin YP, Chen ST. 2008. Optimal step-stress test under type I progressive group-censoring with random removals. J. Stat. Plann. Inference 138:817–26 [Google Scholar]
  74. Xiong C. 1998. Inferences on a simple step-stress model with type-II censored exponential data. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 47:142–46 [Google Scholar]
  75. Xiong C. 2003. Step-stress accelerated life testing. Handbook of Reliability Engineering H Pham 457–69 London: Springer [Google Scholar]
  76. Xiong C, Ji M. 2004. Analysis of grouped and censored data from step-stress life test. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 53:22–28 [Google Scholar]
  77. Xiong C, Milliken GA. 1999. Step-stress life-testing with random stress-change times for exponential data. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 48:141–48 [Google Scholar]
  78. Xiong C, Zhu K, Ji M. 2006. Analysis of a simple step-stress life test with a random stress-change time. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 55:67–74 [Google Scholar]
  79. Xu H, Tang Y. 2003. Commentary: the Khamis/Higgins model. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 52:4–6 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-statistics-060116-054214
Loading
Hazard Rate Modeling of Step-Stress Experiments
Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application 4, 147 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-statistics-060116-054214
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-statistics-060116-054214
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-statistics-060116-054214
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error