1932

Abstract

The social brain (or Machiavellian Intelligence) hypothesis was proposed to explain primates' unusually large brains: It argues that the cognitive demands of living in complexly bonded social groups selected for increases in executive brain (principally neocortex). The evidence for this and alternative hypotheses is reviewed. Although there remain difficulties of interpretation, the bulk of the evidence comes down in favor of the social brain hypothesis. The extent to which the cognitive demands of bonding large intensely social groups involve aspects of social cognition, such as theory of mind, is explored. These findings are then related to the evolution of social group size, language, and culture within the hominid lineage.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev.anthro.32.061002.093158
2003-10-01
2024-07-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev.anthro.32.061002.093158
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev.anthro.32.061002.093158
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error