1932

Abstract

Beginning in the 1930s, evolution became an experimental subject. New techniques, especially in , made possible quantitative analysis of natural populations. In addition to a large number of studies on many species, there were four major controversies that dominated much of the discussion and experimentation. Some of the arguments were quite heated. These controversies were: Wright vs Fisher on Wright's shifting-balance theory; dominance vs overdominance as an explanation of heterosis; the classical vs balance hypothesis for genetic variability; the neutral theory of molecular evolution. Curiously, most of these issues were not really resolved. Rather they were abandoned in favor of more tractable studies made possible by the new molecular methods.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev.genet.42.110807.091612
2008-12-01
2024-04-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/genet/42/1/annurev.genet.42.110807.091612.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev.genet.42.110807.091612&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. 1. BEAR 1956. The Biological Effects of Atomic Radiation Washington: Natl. Acad. Sci.
  2. Blum D. 2.  1992. Scientists in open war over “neutral theory” of genetics. Sacramento Bee March 16
  3. Cain AJ, Sheppard PM. 3.  1950. Selection in the polymorphic land snail, Cepaea nemoralis. Heredity 4:225–54 [Google Scholar]
  4. Comstock RE, Robinson HF, Harvey PH. 4.  1949. A breeding procedure designed to make maximum use of both general and specific combining ability. Agron. J. 41:360–67 [Google Scholar]
  5. Coyne JA, Barton NH, Turelli M. 5.  1997. Perspective: a critique of Wright's shifting balance theory of evolution. Evolution 51:643–71 [Google Scholar]
  6. Coyne JA, Barton NH, Turelli M. 6.  2000. Is Wright's shifting balance process important in evolution?. Evolution 54:306–17 [Google Scholar]
  7. Crow JF. 7.  1948. Alternative hypotheses of hybrid vigor. Genetics 33:477–87 [Google Scholar]
  8. Crow JF. 8.  1952. Dominance and overdominance. See Ref. 27 282–97An exposition of the overdominance hypothesis, popular in the 1950s
  9. Crow JF. 9.  1954. Breeding structure of populations. II. Effective population number. Statistics and Mathematics in Biology O Kempthorne, TA Bancroft, JW Gowen, JL Lush 543–56 Ames: Iowa State College Press [Google Scholar]
  10. Crow JF. 10.  1987. Population genetics history: a personal view. Annu. Rev. Genet. 21:1–22 [Google Scholar]
  11. Crow JF. 11.  1993. Mutation, mean fitness, and genetic load. Oxf. Surv. Evol. Biol. 9:3–42 [Google Scholar]
  12. Crow JF. 12.  1995. Quarreling geneticists and a diplomat. Genetics 140:421–26 [Google Scholar]
  13. Crow JF. 13.  2000. The rise and fall of overdominance. Plant Breed. Rev. 17:225–57The current status of overdominance as an explanation of heterosis [Google Scholar]
  14. Crow JF. 14.  2004. Assessing population subdivision. Evolutionary Theory and Processes: Modern Horizons SP Wasser 35–42 Dordrecht: Kluwer [Google Scholar]
  15. Crow JF, Denniston C. 15.  1988. Inbreeding and variance effective population numbers. Evolution 42:482–95 [Google Scholar]
  16. Crow JF, Engels WR, Denniston C. 16.  1990. Phase three of Wright's shifting-balance theory. Evolution 44:233–47 [Google Scholar]
  17. Crow JF, Kimura M. 17.  1970. An Introduction to Population Genetics Theory New York: Harper & Row
  18. Crow JF, Temin RG. 18.  1964. Evidence for the partial dominance of recessive lethal genes in natural populations of Drosophila. Am. Nat. 98:21–33 [Google Scholar]
  19. Dobzhansky T. 19.  1937. Genetics and the Origin of Species New York: Columbia Univ. PressDobzhansky's widely influential book on evolution
  20. Dobzhansky T. 20.  1955. A review of some fundamental concepts and problems of population genetics. Cold Spring Harbor Symp. Quant. Biol. 20:1–15Dobzhansky's presentation of the classical and balance hypotheses [Google Scholar]
  21. Fisher RA. 21.  1930 (1999). The Genetical Theory of Natural Selection Variorum Edition JH Bennett Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press
  22. Fisher RA. 22.  1949. The Theory of Inbreeding Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd
  23. Freese E. 23.  1962. On the evolution of base composition of DNA. J. Theor. Biol. 3:82–101 [Google Scholar]
  24. Garcia-Dorado A, Caballero A, Crow JF. 24.  2003. On the persistence and pervasiveness of a new mutation. Evolution 57:2644–46 [Google Scholar]
  25. Gillespie JH. 25.  1984. The molecular clock may be an episodic clock. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 81:8009–13 [Google Scholar]
  26. Goodnight CJ, Wade MJ. 26.  2000. The ongoing synthesis: a reply to Coyne, Barton, and Turelli. Evolution 54:317–24 [Google Scholar]
  27. Gowen JW. 27.  1952. Heterosis Ames: Iowa State College Press
  28. Greenberg R, Crow JF. 28.  1960. A comparison of lethal and detrimental chromosomes from natural populations. Genetics 45:1153–68 [Google Scholar]
  29. Haldane JBS. 29.  1937. The effect of variation on fitness. Am. Nat. 71:337–49 [Google Scholar]
  30. Haldane JBS. 30.  1956. The theory of selection for melanism in Lepidoptera. Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B 145:303–8 [Google Scholar]
  31. Haldane JBS. 31.  1957. The cost of natural selection. J. Genet. 55:511–24 [Google Scholar]
  32. Hoekstra H, Coyne J. 32.  1992. The locus of evolution: evo devo and the genetics of adaptation. Evolution 61:995–1016 [Google Scholar]
  33. Hull FH. 33.  1952. Overdominance and recurrent selection. See Ref. 27 451–73
  34. Huxley JS. 34.  1942. Evolution, the Modern Synthesis New York: Harper
  35. Jones DF. 35.  1917. Dominance of linked factors as a means of accounting for heterosis. Genetics 2:466–79 [Google Scholar]
  36. Kimura M. 36.  1965. Attainment of quasi linkage equilibrium when gene frequencies are changing by natural selection. Genetics 52:875–90 [Google Scholar]
  37. Kimura M. 37.  1968. Evolutionary rate at the molecular level. Nature 217:624–26 [Google Scholar]
  38. Kimura M. 38.  1983. The Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. PressKimura's book on the neutral theory of molecular evolution
  39. Kimura M. 39.  1994. Population Genetics, Molecular Evolution, and the Neutral Theory. Selected papers N Takahata Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  40. Kimura M, Ohta T. 40.  1969. The average number of generations until fixation of a mutant gene in a finite population. Genetics 61:763–71 [Google Scholar]
  41. King JL, Jukes TH. 41.  1969. Non-Darwinian evolution: random fixation of selectively neutral mutations. Science 164:788–98 [Google Scholar]
  42. Lewontin RC. 42.  1981. Introduction: The scientific work of Th. Dobzhansky. See Ref. 44 93–119
  43. Lewontin RC, Hubby JL. 43.  1966. A molecular approach to the study of genic heterozygosity in natural populations. II. Amount of variation and degree of heterozygosis in natural populations of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Genetics 54:595–609 [Google Scholar]
  44. 44.  Lewontin RC, Moore JA, Provine WB, Wallace B. 1981. Dobzhansky's Genetics of Natural Populations, I–XLIII New York: Columbia Univ. PressThe complete collection of Dobzhansky's numbered papers
  45. Maruyama T, Crow JF. 45.  1975. Heterozygous effects of X-ray induced mutations on viability of Drosophila melanogaster. Mutat. Res. 27:241–48 [Google Scholar]
  46. Maruyama T, Crow JF, Pandey J. 46.  1975. Addendum. Mutat. Res. 27:255 [Google Scholar]
  47. Morton NE, Crow JF, Muller HJ. 47.  1956. An estimate of the mutational damage in man from data on consanquineous marriages. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 42:855–63The first attempt to use genetic load theory to estimate mutational damage [Google Scholar]
  48. Mukai T, Chigusa SI, Mettler LR, Crow JF. 48.  1972. Mutation rate and dominance of genes affecting viability in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 72:335–55 [Google Scholar]
  49. Nevo E, Beiles A, Ben-Shlomo R. 49.  1984. The evolutionary significance of genetic diversity: ecological, demographic and life history correlates. Lect. Notes Biomath. 53:13–213 [Google Scholar]
  50. Pandey J. 50.  1975. Further studies on heterozygous effects of radiation on viability of Drosophila melanogaster. Mutat. Res. 27:249–54 [Google Scholar]
  51. Provine WB. 51.  1981. Origins of the genetics of natural populations series. See Ref. 44 93–119
  52. Provine WB. 52.  1986. Sewall Wright and Evolutionary Biology Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  53. Shull GH. 53.  1908. The composition of a field of maize. Rep. Am. Breed. Assn. 4:296–301 [Google Scholar]
  54. Simmons MJ, Sheldon EW, Crow JF. 54.  1978. Heterozygous effects on fitness of EMS-treated chromosomes in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 88:575–90 [Google Scholar]
  55. Simpson GG. 55.  1944. Tempo and Mode in Evolution New York: Columbia Univ. Press
  56. Sprague GF, Russell WA. 56.  1956. Some evidence on type of gene action involved in yield heterosis in maize. 522–26 Proc. Int. Genet. Symp. Tokyo/Kyoto: [Google Scholar]
  57. Stebbins GL. 57.  1950. Variation and Evolution in Plants New York: Columbia Univ. Press
  58. Sturtevant AH, Dobzhansky T. 58.  1936. Inversions in the third chromosome of wild races of Drosophila pseudoobscura, and their use in the study of the history of the species. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 22:448–50 [Google Scholar]
  59. Sueoka N. 59.  1962. On the genetic basis of variation and heterogeneity of DNA base composition. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA 48:582–92 [Google Scholar]
  60. Takahata N. 60.  1987. On the overdispersed molecular closk. Genetics 116:169–79 [Google Scholar]
  61. Takahata N, Ishii K, Matsuda H. 61.  1975. Effect of temporal fluctuation of selection coefficient on gene frequency in a population. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 72:4541–45 [Google Scholar]
  62. Temin RG, Meyer HU, Dawson PS, Crow JF. 62.  1969. The influence of epistasis on homozygous viability depression in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 61:497–519 [Google Scholar]
  63. Vetukhiv MA. 63.  1953. Viability of hybrids between local population of Drosophila pseudoobscura. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 39:30–34 [Google Scholar]
  64. Wade MJ. 64.  1998. The theories of Fisher and Wright in the context of metapopulations: when nature does many small experiments. Evolution 52:1537–53 [Google Scholar]
  65. Wallace B. 65.  1958. The average effect of radiation-induced mutations on viability in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 12:532–52 [Google Scholar]
  66. Wang J, Caballero A. 66.  1999. Developments in predicting the effective size of subdivided populations. Heredity 82:212–26 [Google Scholar]
  67. Wright S. 67.  1931. Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics 16:97–159 [Google Scholar]
  68. Wright S. 68.  1965. Factor interaction and linkage in evolution. Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B 162:80–104Wright's clearest exposition of his shifting-balance theory [Google Scholar]
  69. Wright S. 69.  1968, 1969, 1977, 1978. Evolution and the Genetics of Popuations. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press 4 vols.Wright's life work and that of many others summarized and analyzed in four volumes
  70. Wright S. 70.  1988. Surfaces of selective value revisited. Am. Nat. 131:115–23 [Google Scholar]
  71. Zuckerkandl E, Pauling L. 71.  1965. Evolutionary divergence and convergence in proteins. Evolving Genes and Proteins V Bryson, HJ Vogel 97–166 New York: Academic [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev.genet.42.110807.091612
Loading
  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error