1932

Abstract

This review proposes that the recursivity of law offers a promising framework for sociolegal and interdisciplinary research on global norm-making. The recursivity approach is systematic, generates hypotheses and questions about global actors and mechanisms, takes seriously historical contingency, and is inherently comparative across issue areas and different levels of governance. In global lawmaking, recursivity proceeds principally through the intersection of three interacting cycles of global normmaking, national lawmaking, and the interaction between the two. With particular focus on genocide and war crimes, violence against women, trade law, and climate change, the review demonstrates how four mechanisms—actor mismatch, diagnostic struggles, contradictions, and indeterminacy—drive forward these cycles of reform until the inherent tensions within them are resolved and normmaking settles. A sociolegal approach to the recursivity of global normmaking emphasizes () the politics of the legal complex, () the constitutive power of legal concepts, () the structure and dynamics of global regulatory institutions, and () the formal properties of global law. The review concludes with generalizations about global normmaking and particularly promising topics for sociolegal scholarship.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.093008.131606
2009-12-01
2024-06-15
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.093008.131606
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.093008.131606
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error