1932

Abstract

Accountability can mean many things, but increasingly it is linked to quantification. This is true in many fields, including law. This review considers how the recent emphasis on quantitative accountability has influenced law and legal practices. Rather than offering a broad survey of quantitative techniques deployed in law, the article examines three legal contexts in which quantification has shaped how actors are held accountable: sentencing guidelines, cost-benefit analysis in regulation, and law school rankings. The conditions that promote rigorous quantification, its effects on professional discretion, relations of authority, and resistance are examined. The article suggests fruitful questions and strategies for analyzing more broadly the effects of quantification in law.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.2.081805.105908
2007-12-01
2024-06-22
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.2.081805.105908
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.2.081805.105908
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error