1932

Abstract

Interdisciplinary research has long been suspect within the disciplines. Because the disciplines control recruitment, tenure, and promotion, it is difficult for interdisciplinary scholarship to gain traction in the academic world. Within socio-legal scholarship, the Law and Society Association has been instrumental in fostering interdisciplinary and, more recently, transnational research. The association's latest and certainly one of its most promising interdisciplinary and international initiatives is the creation of Collaborative Research Networks (CRNs). These CRNs, while of relatively recent origin, have already contributed impressively. On the one hand, they have established structures and processes that provide opportunities, training, and rewards for interdisciplinary scholars. On the other hand, the CRNs have demonstrated the multiplicity of ways in which socio-legal scholarship can bring all manner of research tools to bear on topics that cross disciplinary and national boundaries—incorporating the global and the local as well as the mediating forces and institutions betwixt and between.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.4.110707.172346
2008-12-01
2024-06-12
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/lawsocsci/4/1/annurev.lawsocsci.4.110707.172346.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.4.110707.172346&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Cohen A, Vauchez A. 2007. Introduction: law, lawyers, and transnational politics in the production of Europe. Law Soc. Inq. 32:75–82 [Google Scholar]
  2. Haas EB. 1958. The Uniting of Europe: Political, Social and Economic Forces, 1950–1957 Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  3. Halliday TC. 1998. Lawyers as institution builders: constructing markets, states, civil society, and community. Crossing Boundaries: Traditions and Transformations in Law and Society Research A Sarat, M Constable, D Engel, V Hans, S Lawrence 242–95 Evanston, IL: Northwest. Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  4. Halliday TC, Karpik L. 1997. Lawyers and the Rise of Western Political Liberalism: Europe and North America from the Eighteenth to Twentieth Centuries Oxford: Clarendon [Google Scholar]
  5. Halliday TC, Karpik L, Feeley MM. 2008. Fighting for Political Freedom: Comparative Studies of the Legal Complex and Political Liberalism Oxford: Hart [Google Scholar]
  6. Lindberg LL, Scheingold SA. 1970. Europe's Would-Be Polity: Patterns of Change in the European Community New York: Prentice Hall [Google Scholar]
  7. Sarat A, Scheingold SA. 1998. Cause Lawyering: Political Commitments and Professional Responsibilities New York: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  8. Sarat A, Scheingold SA. 2001. Cause Lawyering and the State in a Global Era New York: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  9. Sarat A, Scheingold SA. 2005. The Worlds that Cause Lawyers Make: Structure and Agency in Legal Practice Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  10. Sarat A, Scheingold SA. 2006. Cause Lawyering and Social Movements Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  11. Sarat A, Scheingold SA. 2008. The Cultural Lives of Cause Lawyers New York: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  12. Scheingold SA. 1971. The Law in Political Integration: The Evolution and Integrative Implications of Regional Legal Processes in the European Community Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press Cent. Int. Aff. [Google Scholar]
  13. Scheingold SA. 1974. The Politics of Rights: Lawyers, Public Policy, and Political Change New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  14. Scheingold SA. 2004. The Politics of Rights: Lawyers, Public Policy, and Political Change Ann Arbor: Univ. Mich. Press, 2nd.ed. [Google Scholar]
  15. Scheingold SA, Sarat A. 2005. Something to Believe In: Lawyers, Causes, Careers, and Democracy Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  16. Scheppele KL. 2006. The international state of emergency: challenges to constitutionalism after September 11 Work. Pap., Law Public Aff. Progr. Princeton Univ. [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.4.110707.172346
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.4.110707.172346
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error