Political scientists make heavy use of census statistics but have given scant attention to the politics behind the production of those statistics. Key issues that merit analytic attention by political science include vote dilution, the policy of population growth and composition, distributional accuracy and census undercounts, the establishment of statistical races, the color-blind challenge to the ethnoracial classification, the political independence of federal statistics, the important distinction between the scientific production and the political use of the census and other statistical products, public concern about government intrusiveness, and the shift from survey and census data to administrative and digital data.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


Literature Cited

  1. Anderson MJ. 1988. The American Census: A Social History New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  2. California Secretary of State 2003. Proposition 54: Official voter information guide http://vote2003.sos.ca.gov/propositions/2-3-prop-54.html [Google Scholar]
  3. Citro CF, Cork DL, Norwood JL. 2004. The 2000 Census: Counting Under Adversity Washington, DC: Natl. Acad. Press [Google Scholar]
  4. Cohen P. 1982. A Calculating People: The Spread of Numeracy in Early America Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  5. Commager HS. 1975. Jefferson, Nationalism, and the Enlightenment New York: George Braziller [Google Scholar]
  6. Dahl RA. 2002. How Democratic is the American Constitution? New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  7. Darga K. 1999. Sampling and the Census: A Case Against the Proposed Adjustments for Undercount Washington, DC: Am. Enterprise Inst. [Google Scholar]
  8. Edmonston B, Schultze C. 1995. Modernizing the U. S. Census Washington, DC: Natl. Acad. Press [Google Scholar]
  9. 1997. Federal measures of race and ethnicity and the implications for the 2000 census Hearings before the Subcommittee on Government Management, Information, and Technology of the Committee on Government Reform and Oversight, House of Representatives, 105th Congr., 1st sess., Apr. 23, May 23, July 25, p. 57 [Google Scholar]
  10. Graham HD. 2002. The origins of official minority designation. The New Race Question: How the Census Counts Multiracial Individuals J Perlmann, MC Waters 288–99 NewYork: Russell Sage Found. [Google Scholar]
  11. Haney Lopez I. 2007. “A nation of minorities”: race, ethnicity, and reactionary colorblindness. Stanford Law Rev. 59:4985–1063 [Google Scholar]
  12. Heer D. 1968. Social Statistics and the City Cambridge, MA: Joint Cent. Urban Stud. [Google Scholar]
  13. Hillygus DS, Nie N, Prewitt K, Pals H. 2006. The Hard Count: The Political and Social Challenges of Census Mobilization New York: Russell Sage Found. [Google Scholar]
  14. Hochschild JL. 2002. Multiple racial identifiers in the 2000 census, and then what?. The New Race Question: How the Census Counts Multiracial Individuals J Perlmann, MC Waters 340–53 New York: Russell Sage Found. [Google Scholar]
  15. Hochschild J, Powell BM, Weaver VM. 2008. Political discourse on racial mixture: American newspapers, 1865 to 1970 Presented at Annu. Midwest Polit. Sci. Assoc. Natl. Conf., 66th, Chicago, IL, Apr. 3–6 [Google Scholar]
  16. Hollinger D. 2003. Amalgamation and hypodescent: the question of ethnoracial mixture in the history of the United States. Am. Hist. Rev. 108:51363–90 [Google Scholar]
  17. Jefferson T. 1774. A summary view of the rights of British America Reproduced by http://www.ashbrook.org/library/18/jefferson/summaryview.html [Google Scholar]
  18. Lawrence D, Eaton ML, Freedman DA, Klein SP, Olshen RA. et al. 1999. Statistical controversies in Census 2000. Jurimetrics 40:347–75 [Google Scholar]
  19. Lazer D, Adamic L, Aral S, Barabási AL, Devon B. et al. 2009. Computational social science. Science 323:5915721–23 [Google Scholar]
  20. Leadership Conference on Civil Rights 2000. Census 2000 education kit http://www.civilrights.org/publications/reports/census2000/1_1.html [Google Scholar]
  21. Mezey N. 2003. Erasure and recognition: the census, race and the national imagination. Northwest. Univ. Law Rev. 97:41701–68 [Google Scholar]
  22. Morgan ES. 1977. The Birth of the Republic: 1763–89 Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  23. Mossbacher RA. 1991. Decision of the secretary of commerce on whether a statistical adjustment of the 1990 census of population and housing should be made for coverage of deficiencies resulting in an overcount or undercount of the population. Fed. Regist. 56:140 [Google Scholar]
  24. Nicholson J. 1997. Memo from the Chairman of the Republican National Committee.
  25. Onuf PS. 2000. Jefferson's Empire: The Language of American Nationhood Charlottesville, NC: Univ. Virginia Press [Google Scholar]
  26. Prewitt K. 2003. Politics and Science in Census Taking New York: Russell Sage Found Washington, DC: Population Reference Bur. [Google Scholar]
  27. Prewitt K. 2004. What if we give a census and no one comes?. Science 304:56761452–53 [Google Scholar]
  28. Prewitt K. 2011. Racial Counting in America: Do We Still Need It? Do We Still Want It? Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press In press [Google Scholar]
  29. Scott J. 1998. Seeing Like a State New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  30. Smith R. 1997. Civic Ideas: Conflicting Visions of Citizenship in U. S. History New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  31. Starr P. 1987. The sociology of official statistics. The Politics of Numbers W Alonso, P Starr New York: Russell Sage Found. [Google Scholar]
  32. Starr P. 1992. Social categories and claims in the liberal state. Soc. Res. 59:2263 [Google Scholar]
  33. Wallman K. 1998. Data on race and ethnicity: revising the federal standard. Am. Statistician 52:131–33 [Google Scholar]
  34. Washington G. 1939. The Writings of George Washington 31329 Washington, DC: Gov. Print. Off. [Google Scholar]
  35. Washington SL. 2004. Principles of racial taxonomy Presented at Grad. Student Conf. Categories, Columbia Univ. New York, NY:22 [Google Scholar]
  36. Wight T, Hogan H. 1999. Census 2000: evolution of the revised plan. CHANCE: Mag. Am. Stat. Assoc. 12:411–19 [Google Scholar]
  37. Williams KM. 2006. Mark One Or More: Civil Rights in Multiracial America Ann Arbor: Univ. Mich. Press [Google Scholar]
  38. Wills G. 2003. Negro President: Jefferson and the Slave Power. Boston: Houghton Mifflin [Google Scholar]
  39. Zolberg A. 2006. A Nation by Design: Immigration Policy in the Fashioning of America New York: Russell Sage Found Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error