1932

Abstract

Forms of convenience voting—early in-person voting, voting by mail, absentee voting, electronic voting, and voting by fax—have become the mode of choice for >30% of Americans in recent elections. Despite this, and although nearly every state in the United States has adopted at least one form of convenience voting, the academic research on these practices is unequally distributed across important questions. A great deal of literature on turnout is counterbalanced by a dearth of research on campaign effects, election costs, ballot quality, and the risk of fraud. This article introduces the theory of convenience voting, reviews the current literature, and suggests areas for future research.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.053006.190912
2008-06-15
2024-04-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/pl/11/1/annurev.polisci.11.053006.190912.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.053006.190912&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Aldrich JH. 1993. Rational choice and turnout. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 37:246 [Google Scholar]
  2. Alvarez RM, Ansolabehere S, Stewart CS III. 2005. Studying elections: data quality and pitfalls in measuring the effects of voting technologies. Policy Stud. J. 33:15–24 [Google Scholar]
  3. Alvarez RM, Antonsson EK. 2007. Bridging science, technology, and politics in election systems. Bridge 37:6–10 [Google Scholar]
  4. Alvarez RM, Hall T. 2004. Point, Click, and Vote Washington, DC: Brookings Inst. Press
  5. Alvarez RM, Hall T. 2008. Electronic Elections Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  6. Alvarez RM, Hall T, Llewellyn M. 2008a. Are Americans confident their ballots are counted?. J. Polit. In press [Google Scholar]
  7. Alvarez RM, Hall T, Sinclair B. 2008b. Whose absentee votes are counted: the variety and use of absentee ballots in California. Elect. Stud. In press [Google Scholar]
  8. Ansolabehere S, Iyengar S. 1995. Going Negative: How Political Advertisements Shrink and Polarize the Electorate New York: Free Press
  9. Ansolabehere S, Stewart C. 2005. Residual votes attributable to technology. J. Polit. 67:365–89 [Google Scholar]
  10. Barreto M, Streb M, Marks M, Guerra F. 2006. Do absentee voters differ from polling place voters? New evidence from California. Public Opin. Q. 70:224–34 [Google Scholar]
  11. Berinsky AJ. 2005. The perverse consequences of electoral reform in the United States. Am. Polit. Res. 33:471–91 [Google Scholar]
  12. Berinsky AJ, Burns N, Traugott MW. 2001. Who votes by mail? A dynamic model of the individual-level consequences of voting-by-mail systems. Public Opin. Q. 65:178–97 [Google Scholar]
  13. Box-Steffensmeier JM, Kimball D. 1999. The timing of voting decisions in presidential campaigns Presented at Annu. Meet. Midwest Polit. Sci. Assoc., Chicago
  14. Bradbury B. 2005. Vote by mail: the real winner in democracy. Washington Post Jan. 1, Sec. A p. 23 [Google Scholar]
  15. Brader T. 2005. Striking a responsive chord: how political ads motivate and persuade voters by appealing to emotions. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 49:388–405 [Google Scholar]
  16. Campbell A. 1960. Surge and decline: a study of electoral change. Public Opin. Q. 24:397–418 [Google Scholar]
  17. Commission on Federal Election Reform 2005. Building Confidence in U.S. Elections: Report of the Commission on Federal Election Reform Washington, DC: Am. Univ.
  18. Delli Carpini MX, Keeter S. 1996. What Americans Know About Politics and Why It Matters New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
  19. Demos 2006. Election Day registration helps America vote Demos: a network for ideas and action, Washington, DC. http://www.demos.org/pubs/EDR%20Toolkit%20070506.pdf
  20. Dubin JA, Kaslow GA. 1996. Comparing absentee and precinct voters: a view over time. Polit. Behav. 18:369–92 [Google Scholar]
  21. Dyck JJ, Gimpel JG. 2005. Distance, turnout, and the convenience of voting. Soc. Sci. Q. 86:531–48 [Google Scholar]
  22. Fitzgerald M. 2005. Greater convenience but not greater turnout—the impact of alternative voting methods on electoral participation in the United States. Am. Polit. Res. 33:842–67 [Google Scholar]
  23. Fortier JC. 2006. Absentee and Early Voting: Trends, Promises, and Perils Washington, DC: Am. Enterp. Inst. Press
  24. Fournier P, Nadeau R, Blais A, Gidengil E, Nevitte N. 2004. Time-of-voting decision and susceptibility to campaign effects. Elect. Stud. 23:661–81 [Google Scholar]
  25. Friedman AK. 2005. Voter disenfranchisement and policy toward election reforms. Rev. Policy Res. 22:787–810 [Google Scholar]
  26. Fund J. 2004. Stealing Elections: How Voter Fraud Threatens Our Democracy San Francisco: Encounter Books
  27. Gimpel JG, Dyck J, Shaw D. 2004. Registrants, voters, and turnout variability across neighborhoods. Polit. Behav. 26:343–75 [Google Scholar]
  28. Gimpel JG, Schuknecht JE. 2003. Political participation and the accessbility of the ballot box. Polit. Geography 22:471–88 [Google Scholar]
  29. Gomez BT, Hansford TG, Krause GA. 2007. The Republicans should pray for rain: weather, turnout, and voting in U.S. presidential elections. J. Polit. 69:649–63 [Google Scholar]
  30. Green DP, Shapiro I. 1994. Pathologies of Rational Choice Theory: A Critique of Applications in Political Science New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
  31. Gronke P. 2004. Early voting reforms and American elections Presented at Annu. Meet. Am. Polit. Sci. Assoc.
  32. Gronke P, Galanes-Rosenbaum E. 2008. The growth of early and non-precinct place balloting: when, why, and prospects for the future. In The Election Law Handbooked. B Griffith Chicago: Am. Bar Assoc In press [Google Scholar]
  33. Gronke P, Galanes-Rosenbaum E, Miller P. 2007. Early Voting and Turnout. PS: Polit. Sci. Polit. XL:639–45 [Google Scholar]
  34. Gronke P, Miller P. 2007. Early voting and turnout: a replication and extension Presented at Annu. Meet. Am. Polit. Sci. Assoc., Chicago
  35. Gronke P, Toffey DK. 2007. The psychological and institutional determinants of early voting Presented at Annu. Meet. Am. Polit. Sci. Assoc., Chicago
  36. Gumbel A. 2005. Steal This Vote New York: Nation Books
  37. Hamilton D. 2006. The Oregon voting revolution: how a vote-by-mail experiment transformed the democratic process. Am. Prospect Apr. 13, http://www.prospect.org/cs/articles?article=the_oregon_voting_revolution
  38. Hanmer MJ, Traugott MW. 2004. The impact of voting by mail on voter behavior. Am. Polit. Res. 32:375–405 [Google Scholar]
  39. Hansen JM. 2001. To assure pride and confidence in the electoral process Rep. Miller Cent. Public Aff., Univ. Virginia, Charlottesville
  40. Harris R. 1999. Voting-by-mail: a look at modernizing the electoral system http://www.library.ca.gov/crb/99/notes/v6n3.pdf
  41. Haspel M, Knotts HG. 2005. Location, location, location: precinct placement and the costs of voting. J. Polit. 67:560–73 [Google Scholar]
  42. Highton B. 1997. Easy registration and voter turnout. J. Polit. 59:565–75 [Google Scholar]
  43. Highton B. 2000. Residential mobility, community mobility, and electoral participation. Polit. Behav. 22:109–20 [Google Scholar]
  44. Highton B. 2004. Voter registration and turnout in the United States. Perspect. Polit. 2:507–15 [Google Scholar]
  45. Hill S. 2006. Mail-order democracy. Los Angeles Times Nov. 6 [Google Scholar]
  46. Hillygus DS. 2005. Campaign effects and the dynamics of turnout intention in election 2000. J. Polit. 67:50–68 [Google Scholar]
  47. Holbrook TM, McClurg SD. 2005. The mobilization of core supporters: campaigns, turnout, and electoral composition in United States presidential elections. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 49:689–703 [Google Scholar]
  48. Jeffe D, Jeffe SB. 1990. Absence counts: voting by mail. Am. Enterprise: Nov./Dec.:19–21 [Google Scholar]
  49. Kam D, Keller L. 2004. Early vote sites report intimidation. Palm Beach Post Oct. 25 p. 1B [Google Scholar]
  50. Karp JA, Banducci SA. 2000. Going postal: how all-mail elections influence turnout. Polit. Behav. 22:223–39 [Google Scholar]
  51. Karp JA, Banducci SA. 2001. Absentee voting, mobilization, and participation. Am. Polit. Res. 29:183–95 [Google Scholar]
  52. Kenski K. 2005. Early voting reaches record levels in 2004, National Annenberg Election Survey show, University of Pennsylvania. Press release. http://www.annenbergpublicpolicycenter.org/Downloads/Political_ Communication/naes/2204_03_early%20voting%203_23_05_pr.pdf
  53. Kimball D, Kropf M. 2005. Ballot design and unrecorded voters on paper-based ballots. Public Opin. Q. 69:508–29 [Google Scholar]
  54. Kimball D, Kropf M, Battles L. 2006. Helping America vote? Election administration, partisanship, and provisional voting in the 2004 election. Election Law J. 5:447–61 [Google Scholar]
  55. Knack S. 2001. Election-day registration: the second wave. Am. Polit. Res. 29:65–78 [Google Scholar]
  56. Kousser T, Mullin M. 2008. Will vote-by-mail elections increase participation? Evidence from California counties. Polit. Anal. 15: In press [Google Scholar]
  57. Kropf M. 2006. Should the Missouri state legislature consider early/advance voting? Missouri Legis. Acad., Univ. Missouri. http://truman.missouri.edu/uploads/Publications/IPP%205-2006%20Early%20Voting.pdf
  58. Kuttner R. 2006. Going postal. With vote by mail, Oregon has higher voter turnout and spends less money running elections. Am. Prospect Apr. 16, http://www.prospect.org/cs/articles?article=going_postal [Google Scholar]
  59. Leighley J. 1995. Attitudes, opportunities and incentive: a field essay on political participation. Polit. Res. Q. 48:181–209 [Google Scholar]
  60. Luechinger S, Rosinger M, Stutzer A. 2007. The impact of postal voting on participation: evidence for Switzerland. Swiss Polit. Sci. Rev. 13:167–202 [Google Scholar]
  61. Magleby DB. 1987. Participation in mail ballot elections. Western Polit. Q. 40:79–91 [Google Scholar]
  62. Mebane W. 2006. Election forensics: vote counts and Benford's law Presented at Annu. Meet. Polit. Methodol. Soc., Univ. Calif. Davis
  63. Mebane W. 2007. Evaluating voting systems to improve and verify accuracy Presented at Annu. Meet. Am. Assoc. Advance. Sci., San Francisco
  64. Mebane W, Sekhon JS, Wand J. 2003. Detecting and Correcting Election Irregularities Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ.
  65. Nagler J. 1991. The effect of registration laws and education on U.S. voter turnout. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 85:1393–405 [Google Scholar]
  66. Neeley GW, Richardson LE. 2001. Who is early voting? An individual level examination. Soc. Sci. J. 38:381–92 [Google Scholar]
  67. Nordlinger G. 2003. Early voting: how it's changing strategies, timing and costs. Campaigns Elect. Jul. http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m2519/is_7_24/ai_105657646 [Google Scholar]
  68. Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights 2007. Republic of Estonia parliamentary elections, 4 Mar OSCE/ODIHR elect. assess. mission rep.
  69. Oliver JE. 1996. The effects of eligibility restrictions and party activity on absentee voting and overall turnout. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 40:498–593 [Google Scholar]
  70. Patterson S, Caldeira G. 1985. Mailing in the vote: correlates and consequences of absentee voting. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 29:766–88 [Google Scholar]
  71. Qvortrup M. 2005. First past the postman: voting by mail in comparative perspective. Polit. Q. 76:414–19 [Google Scholar]
  72. Riker WH, Ordeshook PC. 1968. A theory of the calculus of voting. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 62:25–42 [Google Scholar]
  73. Rosenstone S, Hansen JM. 1993. Mobilization, Participation, and Democracy in America New York: Macmillan
  74. Schattschneider EE. 1960. The Semisovereign People: A Realist's View of Democracy in America New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston
  75. Shklar JN. 1991. American Citizenship: The Quest for Inclusion Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  76. Smith JT, Comer J. 2005. Consequential reform or innocuous tinkering? Another look at efforts to increase turnout in American elections Presented at Annu. Meet. Midwest Polit. Sci. Assoc., Chicago
  77. Southwell P. 2004. Five years later: a re-assessment of Oregon's vote by mail electoral process. PS: Polit. Polit. Sci. 98:89–93 [Google Scholar]
  78. Southwell PL, Burchett JI. 2000. The effect of all-mail elections on voter turnout. Am. Polit. Q. 28:72–79 [Google Scholar]
  79. Stein RM. 1998. Introduction: early voting. Public Opin. Q. 62:57–69 [Google Scholar]
  80. Stein RM, García-Monet PA. 1997. Voting early but not often. Soc. Sci. Q. 78:657–71 [Google Scholar]
  81. Stein RM, Leighley J, Owens C. 2004. Voting, early voting and the determinants of vote choice: Is timing everything? Presented at Annu. Meet. Midwest Polit. Sci. Assoc., Chicago
  82. Stein RM, Vonnahme G. 2008. Engaging the unengaged voter: vote centers and voter turnout. J. Polit. 70: In press [Google Scholar]
  83. Steinbicker PG. 1938. Absentee voting in the United States. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 32:898–907 [Google Scholar]
  84. Stewart CH. 2006. Residual vote in the 2004 election. Election Law J. 5:158–69 [Google Scholar]
  85. Teixeira RA. 1987. Why Americans Don't Vote: Turnout Decline in the United States New York: Greenwood
  86. The Century Foundation 2005. Balancing access and integrity: the report of the Century Foundation Working Group on State Implementation of Election Reform Washington, DC: Century Found.
  87. Thompson DF. 2002. Just Elections: Creating a Fair Electoral Process in the United States Chicago and London: Univ. Chicago Press
  88. Thompson DF. 2004. Election time: normative implications of temporal properties of the electoral process in the United States. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 98:51–64 [Google Scholar]
  89. Thompson DF. 2008. Electoral simultaneity: the value of voting at the same time. J. Soc. Iss. In press [Google Scholar]
  90. Traugott MW. 2004. Why electoral reform has failed: If you build it, will they come?. In Rethinking the Vote: The Politics and Prospects of American Election Reformed. A Crigler, M Just, E McCaffery pp. 167–84 New York: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  91. Trechsel AH. 2007. Internet voting in the March 2007 parliamentary elections in Estonia. Florence, It.: Counc. Eur.
  92. Verba S, Schlozman K, Brady H. 1995. Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  93. Voting Technology Project 2001. Voting: what is, what could be Calif. Inst. Technol., Pasadena, CA. http://www.vote.caltech.edu/2001report.htm
  94. Wang T. 2007. A rigged report on U.S. voting?. Washington Post Aug. 30, p. A21 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.053006.190912
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.053006.190912
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error