1932

Abstract

How do individuals form their opinions about gender issues? In this article, we draw upon work on public policy and the social organization of gender to provide a framework for thinking about the existing literature. We strive to illuminate the ways in which the literature's disagreements—about the conceptual scope of the field, about predispositions and policy views, and about theory and explanation—lay the groundwork for a conversation that will bring to light new aspects of the field and provide directions for future research.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev.polisci.12.040507.142213
2010-06-15
2024-06-13
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/polisci/13/1/annurev.polisci.12.040507.142213.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev.polisci.12.040507.142213&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Alvarez RM, Brehm J. 1995. American ambivalence towards abortion policy: development of a heteroskedastic probit model of competing values. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 39:41055–82 [Google Scholar]
  2. Andersen K. 1997. Gender and public opinion. Understanding Public Opinion B Norrander, C Wilcox Washington, DC: CQ Press [Google Scholar]
  3. Bartels L. 2002. Beyond the running tally: partisan bias in political perceptions. Polit. Beh. 24:2117–50 [Google Scholar]
  4. Beere CA, King DW, Beere DB, King LA. 1984. The sex-role egalitarianism scale: a measure of attitudes toward equality between the sexes. Sex Roles 10:7–8):563–76 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bolzendahl CI, Myers DJ. 2004. Feminist attitudes and support for gender equality: opinion change in women and men, 1974–1998. Soc. For. 83:2759–90 [Google Scholar]
  6. Box-Steffensmeier JM, De Boef S, Lin T. 2004. The dynamics of the partisan gender gap. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 98:3515–28 [Google Scholar]
  7. Brewster KL, Padavic I. 2004. Change in gender-ideology, 1977–1996: the contributions of intracohort change and population turnover. J. Marriage Family 62:2477–87 [Google Scholar]
  8. Brown RA, Shaw TC. 2002. Separate nations: two attitudinal dimensions of black nationalism. J. Polit. 64:122–44 [Google Scholar]
  9. Burrell B. 2001. Public Opinion, the First Ladyship and Hillary Rodham Clinton New York: Routledge [Google Scholar]
  10. Campbell DT. 1958. Common fate, similarity, and other indices of the status of aggregates of persons as social entities. Behav. Sci. 3:114–25 [Google Scholar]
  11. Campbell A, Converse P, Miller W, Stokes D. 1960. The American Voter New York: Wiley [Google Scholar]
  12. Carden ML. 1977. Feminism in the Mid-1970s: The Non-Establishment, the Establishment, and the Future New York: Ford Found. [Google Scholar]
  13. Carroll SJ. 1985. Women as Candidates in American Politics Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  14. Cherlin A, Walters PB. 1981. Trends in United States men's and women's sex-role attitudes: 1972 to 1978. Am. Sociol. Rev. 46:4453–60 [Google Scholar]
  15. Collins PH. 1998. Fighting Words: Black Women and the Search for Justice Minneapolis: Univ. Minn. Press [Google Scholar]
  16. Conover PJ. 1984. The influence of group identifications on political perception and evaluation. J. Polit. 46:3760–85 [Google Scholar]
  17. Conover PJ. 1988a. Feminists and the gender gap. J. Polit. 50:4985–1010 [Google Scholar]
  18. Conover PJ. 1988b. The role of social groups in political thinking. Br. J. Polit. Sci. 18:151–76 [Google Scholar]
  19. Conover PJ, Sapiro V. 1993. Gender, feminist consciousness, and war. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 37:41079–99 [Google Scholar]
  20. Cook EA, Jelen TG, Wilcox C. 1992. Between Two Absolutes: Public Opinion and the Politics of Abortion Boulder: Westview [Google Scholar]
  21. Cramer Walsh K. 2004. Talking about Politics: Informal Groups and Social Identity in American Life Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  22. Davis DW, Brown RE. 2002. The antipathy of black nationalism: behavioral and attitudinal implications of an African American ideology. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 46:2239–52 [Google Scholar]
  23. Dawson MC. 1994. Behind the Mule: Race and Class in African-American Politics Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  24. Dawson MC. 2001. Black Visions: The Roots of Contemporary African-American Political Ideologies Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  25. Deitch CH. 1983. Ideology and opposition to abortion: trends in public opinion, 1972–1980. J. Family Econ. Iss. 6:16–26 [Google Scholar]
  26. Deitch CH. 1993. Gender, race, and class politics and the inclusion of women in Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. Gend. Soc. 7:2183–203 [Google Scholar]
  27. DuBois EC. 1978. Feminism and Suffrage: The Emergence of an Independent Women's Movement in America, 1848–1869 Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  28. Duncan OD. 1979. Indicators of sex typing: traditional and egalitarian, situational and ideological responses. Am. J. Sociol. 85:2251–60 [Google Scholar]
  29. Ferree MM. 1974. A woman for president? Changing responses: 1958–1972. Public Opin. Q. 38:3390–99 [Google Scholar]
  30. Gelb J, Palley ML. 1982. Women and Public Policy Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  31. Gelb J, Palley ML. 1987. Women and Public Policy Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press. Rev. ed. [Google Scholar]
  32. Gerber A, Green D. 1998. Rational L and Partisan A. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 42:3794–818 [Google Scholar]
  33. Goffman E. 1977. The arrangement between the sexes. Theor. Soc. 4:3301–31 [Google Scholar]
  34. Gurin P. 1985. Women's gender consciousness. Public Opin. Q. 49:2143–63 [Google Scholar]
  35. Gurin P, Hatchett S, Jackson JS. 1989. Hope and Independence: Blacks' Response to Electoral and Party Politics New York: Sage Found. [Google Scholar]
  36. Gurin P, Miller AH, Gurin G. 1980. Stratum identification and consciousness. Soc. Psychol. Q. 43:130–47 [Google Scholar]
  37. Gurin P, Townsend A. 1986. Properties of gender identity and their implications for gender consciousness. Br. J. Soc. Psychol. 25:2139–48 [Google Scholar]
  38. Harris-Lacewell M. 2001. No place to rest: African American political attitudes and the myth of black women's strength. Wom. Polit. 23:31–33 [Google Scholar]
  39. Huddy L, Cassese E, Lizotte M. 2008. Gender, public opinion, and political reasoning. In. Political Women and American Democracy C Wolbrecht, K Beckwith, L Baldez 231–49 New York: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  40. Hutchings VL, Valentino NA, Philpot TS, White IK. 2004. The compassion strategy. Public Opin. Q. 68:4512–41 [Google Scholar]
  41. Inglehart R, Norris P. 2000. The developmental theory of the gender gap: women's and men's voting behavior in global perspective. Int. Polit. Sci. Rev. 21:4441–63 [Google Scholar]
  42. Jackman MR. 1994. The Velvet Glove: Paternalism and Conflict in Gender, Class, and Race Relations Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press [Google Scholar]
  43. Jelen TG, Wilcox C. 2003. Causes and consequences of public attitudes toward abortion: a review and research agenda. Polit. Res. Q. 56:4489–500 [Google Scholar]
  44. Jelen TG, Wilcox C. 2005. Continuity and change in attitudes toward abortion: Poland and the United States. Polit. Gend. 1:2297–317 [Google Scholar]
  45. Jennings MK. 2006. The gender gap in attitudes and beliefs about the place of women in American political life: a longitudinal, cross-generational analysis. Polit. Gend. 2:2193–219 [Google Scholar]
  46. Kanter RM. 1993. Men and Women of the Corporation New York: HarperCollins [Google Scholar]
  47. Kinder DR, Sanders LM. 1996. Divided by Color: Racial Politics and Democratic Ideals. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  48. Kinder DR, Winter N. 2001. Exploring the racial divide: blacks, whites, and opinion on national policy. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 45:2439–56 [Google Scholar]
  49. King LA, King DW. 1997. Sex-role egalitarianism scale. Psychol. Wom. Q. 21:171–87 [Google Scholar]
  50. Kluegel JR, Smith ER. 1984. Beliefs and attitudes about women's opportunity: comparisons with beliefs about blacks and a general perspective. Soc. Psychol. Q. 47:181–95 [Google Scholar]
  51. Kraditor AS. 1965. The Ideas of the Woman Suffrage Movement, 1890–1920 New York: Columbia Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  52. Lee F, Hallahan M. 2001. Do situational expectations produce situational inferences? The role of future expectations in directing inferential goals. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 80:4545–56 [Google Scholar]
  53. Lee F, Hallahan M, Herzog T. 1996. Explaining real-life events: how culture and domain shape attributions. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 22:7732–41 [Google Scholar]
  54. Lewin K. 1948. Resolving Social Conflicts New York: Harper & Row [Google Scholar]
  55. Luker K. 1984. Abortion and the Politics of Motherhood Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press [Google Scholar]
  56. Mahalingam R, Rodriguez J. 2003. Essentialism, power and cultural psychology of gender. J. Cogn. Cult. 3:2154–74 [Google Scholar]
  57. Mannheim K. 1952. 1928 The problem of generations. Essays in the Sociology of Knowledge K Mannheim 276–322 New York: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  58. Mason KO, Bumpass LL. 1975. U.S. women's sex-role ideology, 1970. Am. J. Sociol. 80:51212–19 [Google Scholar]
  59. Mason KO, Czajka JL, Arber S. 1976. Change in U.S. women's sex-role attitudes, 1964–1974. Am. Sociol. Rev. 41:4573–96 [Google Scholar]
  60. Mason KO, Lu Y. 1988. Attitudes toward women's familial roles. Gend. Soc. 2:139–57 [Google Scholar]
  61. Marx K. 1976. 1867 Capital, Volume 1 New York: Random House [Google Scholar]
  62. McClerking HK. 2001. We Are in This Together: The Origins and Maintenance of Black Common Fate Perceptions Ann Arbor: Univ. Mich. Press [Google Scholar]
  63. McDonagh E. 2009. Motherless State Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  64. McHugh MC, Frieze IH. 1997. The measurement of gender-role attitudes: a review and commentary. Psychol. Wom. Q. 21:11–16 [Google Scholar]
  65. Miller AH, Gurin P, Gurin G. 1978. Electoral implications of group identification and consciousness: the reintroduction of a concept Presented at Annu. Meet. Am. Polit. Sci. Assoc., New York [Google Scholar]
  66. Myrdal G. 1944. An American Dilemma: The Negro Problem and American Democracy New York: Harper & Row [Google Scholar]
  67. Newman LM. 1999. White Women's Rights: The Racial Origins of Feminism in the United States New York: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  68. Peltola P, Milkie MA, Presser S. 2004. The “feminist” mystique: feminist identity in three generations of women. Gend. Soc. 18:1122–44 [Google Scholar]
  69. Rhodebeck LA. 1996. The structure of men's and women's feminist orientations: feminist identity and feminist opinion. Gend. Soc. 10:4386–403 [Google Scholar]
  70. Ridgeway CL, Correll SJ. 2004. Unpacking the gender system: a theoretical perspective on cultural beliefs in social relations. Gend. Soc. 18:4510–31 [Google Scholar]
  71. Robinson DE. 2001. Black Nationalism in American Politics and Thought Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  72. Rosenberg G. 1991. The Hollow Hope: Can Courts Bring About Social Change? Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  73. Sanbonmatsu K. 2002. Democrats, Republicans, and the Politics of Women's Place Ann Arbor: Univ. Mich. Press [Google Scholar]
  74. Sapiro V. 1983. The Political Integration of Women Champaign: Univ. Illinois Press [Google Scholar]
  75. Sapiro V. 2003. Theorizing gender in political psychology research. Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology DO Sears, L Huddy, R Jervis 601–34 New York: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  76. Sapiro V, Conover PJ. 2001. Gender equality in the public mind. Wom. Polit. 22:1–36 [Google Scholar]
  77. Schnittker J, Freese J, Powell B. 2003. Who are feminists and what do they believe? The role of generations. Am. Sociol. Rev. 68:4607–22 [Google Scholar]
  78. Sears DO. 1988. Symbolic racism. Eliminating Racism: Profiles in Controversy PA Katz, DA Taylor 53–84 New York: Plenum [Google Scholar]
  79. Sears DO, Huddy L. 1986. Social identities and political disunity among women ANES Pilot Stud. Rep. No. nes002258 [Google Scholar]
  80. Sigel R. 1996. Ambition and Accommodation Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  81. Spence JT, Helmreich RL. 1972. The Attitudes Toward Women Scale: An Objective Instrument to Measure Attitudes Toward the Rights and Roles of Women in Contemporary Society Washington, DC: Am. Psychol. Assoc. [Google Scholar]
  82. Steinbugler A, Press J, Johnson Dias J. 2006. Gender, race and affirmative action. Gend. Soc. 20:6805–25 [Google Scholar]
  83. Stoker L, Hochschild J. 2004. Measuring values: the case of equality Work. pap., Deps. Polit. Sci. Univ. Calif., Berkeley, and Harvard Univ. [Google Scholar]
  84. Stoker L, Jennings MK. 2008. Of time and development of partisan polarization. Am. J. Polit. Sci 52:3619–35 [Google Scholar]
  85. Sulfaro V. 2007. Affective evaluations of first ladies: a comparison of Hillary Clinton and Laura Bush. Pres. Stud. Q. 37:3486–514 [Google Scholar]
  86. Swidler A. 1986. Culture in action: symbols and strategies. Am. Sociol. Rev. 51:2273–86 [Google Scholar]
  87. Swidler A. 1997. Talk of Love: How Americans Use Their Culture Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  88. Swidler A. 2001. Talk of Love: How Culture Matters Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  89. Swim JK, Aikin KJ, Hall WS, Hunter BA. 1995. Sexism and racism: old-fashioned and modern prejudices. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 68:22199–214 [Google Scholar]
  90. Swim JK, Cohen LL. 1997. Overt, covert, and subtle sexism: a comparison between the attitudes toward women and modern sexism scales. Psychol. Wom. Q. 21:1103–18 [Google Scholar]
  91. Tate K. 1993. From Protest to Politics: The New Black Voters in American Elections Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  92. Thornton A. 1989. Changing attitudes toward family issues in the United States. J. Marr. Fam. 51:4873–93 [Google Scholar]
  93. Thornton A, Freedman D. 1979. Changes in the sex role attitudes of women, 1962–1977: evidence from a panel study. Am. Sociol. Rev. 44:5831–42 [Google Scholar]
  94. Thornton A, Young-DeMarco L. 2001. Four decades of trends in attitudes toward family issues in the United States: the 1960s through the 1990s. J. Marr. Fam. 63:41009–37 [Google Scholar]
  95. Tolleson Rinehart S. 1992. Gender Consciousness and Politics New York: Routledge [Google Scholar]
  96. Tolleson Rinehart S, Stanley JR. 1994. Claytie and the Lady: Ann Richards, Gender, and Politics in Texas Austin: Univ. Texas Press [Google Scholar]
  97. Welch S, Sigelman L. 1992. A gender gap among hispanics? A comparison with blacks and Anglos. West. Polit. Q. 45:2181–200 [Google Scholar]
  98. Wineburg S. 1999. Historical thinking and other unnatural acts. Phi. Delta Kappan 80:7488–49 [Google Scholar]
  99. Winter NJ. 2000. Gendered and re-gendered: public opinion and Hillary Rodham Clinton Presented at Annu. Meet. Midwest Polit. Sci. Assoc., 59th, Chicago [Google Scholar]
  100. Winter NJ. 2005. Framing gender: political rhetoric, gender schemas, and public opinion on US health care reform. Polit. Gend. 1:03453–80 [Google Scholar]
  101. Winter NJ. 2006. Beyond welfare: framing and the racialization of white opinion on social security. Am. J. Polit. Soc. 50:2400–20 [Google Scholar]
  102. Winter NJ. 2008. Dangerous Frames: How Ideas About Race & Gender Shape Public Opinion Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  103. Winter NJ. 2009. The explicit and implicit gendered basis of American party images Presented at Annu. Meet. Midwest Polit. Sci. Assoc., 68th, Chicago [Google Scholar]
  104. Wolbrecht C. 2000. The Politics of Women's Rights: Parties, Positions, and Change Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  105. Young IM. 1994. Gender as seriality: thinking about women as a social collective. Signs 19:3713–38 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev.polisci.12.040507.142213
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev.polisci.12.040507.142213
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error