1932

Abstract

Trade interdependence does not always reduce hostility between states. It depends on whether the trade represents vulnerability or sensitivity interdependence. Portfolio investment also does not represent a tie that binds politically. Even more important, foreign direct investment (FDI) represents a link that is costly (and time-consuming) to break. Thus, FDI links between countries are more likely to reduce conflict than trading links. Evidence shows that symmetrical FDI is the most stable guarantor of low conflict between countries. One factor generating conflict may be that scarce factors of production are in political command. Abundant factors, now more generally in power among developed states, may be partly responsible for the diminishment of conflict among these states in recent years.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev.polisci.6.121901.085631
2003-06-01
2024-06-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev.polisci.6.121901.085631
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev.polisci.6.121901.085631
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error