1932

Abstract

▪ Abstract 

Are party identifications relatively fixed features on the political landscape in the United States and elsewhere? If they are relatively fixed, do identifications move substantive issue preferences, perceptions of candidates, and perceptions of the link between candidates and issues? Early studies in the United States answered these questions in the affirmative. The track record for other systems is spotty, and each question occasioned repeated controversy in the decades since the 1960s. Much of the apparent lability and cross-national variation in party ties can be laid at the feet of measurement error, but not all. The claim that party identification moves other features on the political landscape is remarkably robust.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev.polisci.9.062404.170523
2006-06-15
2024-05-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev.polisci.9.062404.170523
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev.polisci.9.062404.170523
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error