1932

Abstract

▪ Abstract 

Since the publication of Horowitz's , comparative political scientists have increasingly converged on their classification of ethnic identities. But there is no agreement on the definition that justifies this classification—and the definitions that individual scholars propose do not match their classifications. I propose a definition that captures the conventional classification of ethnic identities in comparative political science to a greater degree than the alternatives. According to this definition, ethnic identities are a subset of identity categories in which membership is determined by attributes associated with, or believed to be associated with, descent (described here simply as descent-based attributes). I argue, on the basis of this definition, that ethnicity either does not matter or has not been shown to matter in explaining most outcomes to which it has been causally linked by comparative political scientists. These outcomes include violence, democratic stability, and patronage.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev.polisci.9.062404.170715
2006-06-15
2024-07-21
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev.polisci.9.062404.170715
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev.polisci.9.062404.170715
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error