Problem solving is a signature attribute of adult humans, but we need to understand how this develops in children. Tool use is proposed as an ideal way to study problem solving in children less than 3 years of age because overt manual action can reveal how the child plans to achieve a goal. Motor errors are as informative as successful actions. Research is reviewed on intentional actions, beginning with block play and progressing to picking up a spoon in different orientations, and finally retrieving objects with rakes and from inside tubes. Behavioral and kinematic measures of motor action are combined to show different facets of skill acquisition and mastery. We need to design environments that encourage and enhance problem solving from a young age. One goal of this review is to excite interest and spur new research on the beginnings of problem solving and its elaboration during development.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


Literature Cited

  1. Adalbjornsson CF, Fischman MG, Rudisill ME. 2008. The end-state comfort effect in young children. Res. Q. Exerc. Sport 79:36–41 [Google Scholar]
  2. Baker RK, Keen R. 2007. Tool use by young children: choosing the right tool for the task Presented at biennial meet Soc. Res. Child Dev. Boston, MA:
  3. Bascandziev I, Harris PL. 2010. The role of testimony in young children's solution of a gravity-driven invisible displacement task. Cogn. Dev. In press
  4. Bates E, Carlson-Luden V, Bretherton I. 1980. Perceptual aspects of tool using in infancy. Infant Behav. Dev. 3:127–40 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bayley N. 1969. Manual for the Bayley Scales of Infant Development New York: Psychol. Corp.
  6. Berthier NE, Clifton RK, Gullipalli V, McCall DD, Robin DJ. 1996. Visual information and object size in the control of reaching. J. Motor Behav. 28:187–97 [Google Scholar]
  7. Brown A. 1990. Domain-specific principles affect learning and transfer in children. Cogn. Sci. 14:107–33 [Google Scholar]
  8. Bruner J. 1973. Organization of early skilled action. Child Dev. 44:1–11 [Google Scholar]
  9. Chen Y, Keen R, Rosander K, von Hofsten C. 2010. Movement planning reflects skill level and age change in toddlers. Child Dev. In press
  10. Chen Z, Siegler R. 2000. Across the great divide: bridging the gap between understanding of toddlers' and other children's thinking. Monogr. Soc. Res. Child Dev. 65:2i–vii1–96 [Google Scholar]
  11. Claxton LJ, Keen R, McCarty ME. 2003. Evidence of motor planning in infant reaching behavior. Psychol. Sci. 14:354–56 [Google Scholar]
  12. Claxton LJ, McCarty ME, Keen R. 2009. Self-directed action affects planning in tool-use tasks with toddlers. Infant Behav. Dev. 32:230–33 [Google Scholar]
  13. Clifton RK. 2002. Learning about infants. Conceptions of Development: Lessons from the Laboratory DJ Lewkowicz, R Lickliter 135–63 New York: Psychol. Press [Google Scholar]
  14. Clifton RK, Rochat P, Litovsky RY, Perris EE. 1991. Object representation guides infants' reaching in the dark. J. Exp. Psychol.: Hum. Percept. Perform. 17:323–29 [Google Scholar]
  15. Clifton RK, Rochat P, Robin DJ, Berthier NE. 1994. Multimodal perception in the control of infant reaching. J. Exp. Psychol.: Hum. Percept. Perform. 20:876–86 [Google Scholar]
  16. Connolly K, Dalgleish M. 1989. The emergence of a tool-using skill in infancy. Dev. Psychol. 6:894–912 [Google Scholar]
  17. Corbetta D, Thelen E. 2002. Behavioral fluctuations and the development of manual asymmetries in infancy: contributions of the dynamic system approach. Handbook of Neuropsychology: Child Neuropsychology, Vol. 8, Pt. 1 SJ Segalowitz, I Rapin 309–28 Amsterdam: Elsevier Sci. [Google Scholar]
  18. Corbetta D, Williams J, Snapp-Childs W. 2006. Plasticity in the development of handedness: evidence from normal development and early asymmetric brain injury. Dev. Psychobiol. 48:460–71 [Google Scholar]
  19. Diamond J. 2005. Collapse: Societies Choose to Fail or Succeed New York: Penguin
  20. Friedman SL, Scholnick EK. 1997. An evolving “blueprint” for planning: psychological requirements, task characteristics, and social-cultural influences. The Developmental Psychology of Planning: Why, How, and When Do We Plan? SL Friedman, EK Scholnick 3–22 Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum [Google Scholar]
  21. Gibson EJ, Pick AD. 2000. An Ecological Approach to Perceptual Learning and Development. New York: Oxford Univ. Press
  22. Hirsh-Pasek K, Golinkoff RM, Berk LE, Singer DG. 2009. A Mandate for Playful Learning in Preschool: Presenting the Evidence New York: Oxford Univ. Press
  23. Hood BM. 1995. Gravity rules for 2- to 4-year-olds?. Cogn. Dev. 10:577–98 [Google Scholar]
  24. Joh A, Jaswal V, Keen R. 2010. Imagining a way out of the gravity bias: preschoolers can visualize the solution to a spatial problem. Child Dev In press
  25. Johnson-Frey SH, McCarty ME, Keen R. 2004. Reaching beyond spatial perception: effects of intended future actions on visually guided prehension. Visual Cogn. 11:371–99 [Google Scholar]
  26. Kohler W. 1927. The Mentality of Apes New York: Harcourt
  27. Koslowski B, Bruner JS. 1972. Learning to use a lever. Child Dev. 43:790–99 [Google Scholar]
  28. Kosslyn SM. 1975. Information representation in visual images. Cogn. Psychol. 7:341–70 [Google Scholar]
  29. Lockman JJ. 2000. A perception-action perspective on tool use development. Child Dev. 71:137–44 [Google Scholar]
  30. Lockman JJ, Ashmead DH, Bushnell EW. 1984. The development of anticipatory hand orientation during infancy. J. Exp. Child Psychol. 37:176–86 [Google Scholar]
  31. Manoel EJ, Moreira CRP. 2005. Planning manipulative hand movements: Do young children show the end-state comfort effect?. J. Hum. Movement Stud. 49:93–114 [Google Scholar]
  32. Marteniuk RG, MacKenzie CL, Jeannerod M, Athenes A, Dugas C. 1987. Constraints on human arm movement trajectories. Can. J. Psychol. 41:365–78 [Google Scholar]
  33. McCarty ME, Clifton RK, Ashmead DH, Lee P, Goubet N. 2001a. How infants use vision for grasping objects. Child Dev. 72:973–87 [Google Scholar]
  34. McCarty ME, Clifton RK, Collard RR. 1999. Problem solving in infancy: the emergence of an action plan. Dev. Psychol. 35:1091–101 [Google Scholar]
  35. McCarty ME, Clifton RK, Collard RR. 2001b. The beginnings of tool use by infants and toddlers. Infancy 2:233–56 [Google Scholar]
  36. McCarty ME, Keen R. 2005. Facilitating problem-solving performance among 9- and 12-month-old infants. J. Cogn. Dev. 6:209–30 [Google Scholar]
  37. Metevier CM. 2006. Tool-using in rhesus monkeys and 36-month-old children: acquisition, comprehension, and individual differences PhD thesis Univ. Mass. Amherst:
  38. Metevier CM, Baker RK, Keen R. 2007. Knowing how to use tools independently does not guarantee their use in sequence Poster at Soc. Res. Child Dev. Boston, MA:
  39. Michel GF. 1983. Development of hand-use preference during infancy. Manual Specialization and the Developing Brain G Young, S Segalowitz, C Cortea, S Trehub 33–70 New York: Academic [Google Scholar]
  40. Newell KM, Scully DM, McDonald PV, Baillargeon R. 1989. Task constraints and infant grip configurations. Dev. Psychobiol. 22:817–31 [Google Scholar]
  41. Piaget J. 1952. The Origins of Intelligence New York: Int. Univ. Press
  42. Richards CA, Sanderson JA. 1999. The role of imagination in facilitating deductive reasoning in 2-, 3-, and 4-year-olds. Cognition 72:B1–9 [Google Scholar]
  43. Rieser JJ, Garing AE, Young MF. 1994. Imagery, action, and young children's spatial orientation: It's not being there that counts, it's what one has in mind. Child Dev. 65:1262–78 [Google Scholar]
  44. Rosenbaum DA, Halloran ES, Cohen RG. 2006. Grasping movement plans. Psychol. Bull. Rev. 13:918–22 [Google Scholar]
  45. Rosenbaum DA, Marchak F, Barnes J, Vaughan J, Slotta J, Jorgenson M. 1990. Constraints for action-selection: overhand versus underhand grips. Attention and Performance XIII M Jeannerod 321–42 Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum [Google Scholar]
  46. Rosenbaum DA, van Heugten CM, Caldwell GE. 1996. From cognition to biomechanics and back: the end-state comfort effect and middle-is-faster effect. Acta Psychol. 94:59–85 [Google Scholar]
  47. Schulz LE, Bonawitz EB. 2007. Serious fun: preschoolers engage in more exploratory play when evidence is confounded. Dev. Psychol. 43:1045–50 [Google Scholar]
  48. Smith PK, Dutton S. 1979. Play and training in direct and innovative problem solving. Child Dev. 50:830–36 [Google Scholar]
  49. Smitsman AW. 1997. The development of tool use: changing boundaries between organism and environment. Evolving Explanations of Development: Ecological Approaches to Organism-environment Systems C Dent-Read, P Zukow-Goldring 301–29 Washington, DC: Am. Psychol. Assoc. [Google Scholar]
  50. Smitsman AW, Cox RFA. 2008. Perseveration in tool use: a window for understanding the dynamics of the action-selection process. Infancy 13:249–69 [Google Scholar]
  51. Spies JR, Keen R. 2010. Picking up tools: cognitive and motor factors in acquiring a new skill Presented at biennial meet Int. Conf. Infant Studies Baltimore, MD:
  52. van Leeuwen L, Smitsman A, van Leeuwen C. 1994. Affordances, perceptual complexity, and the development of tool use. J. Exp. Psychol.: Hum. Percept. Perform. 20:174–91 [Google Scholar]
  53. van Roon D, Van Der Kamp J, Steenbergen B. 2003. Constraints in children's learning to use spoons. Development of Movement Coordination in Children: Applications in the Field of Ergonomics, Health Sciences and Sport G Savelsbergh, K Davids, J van der Kamp, S Bennett 75–93 London: Routledge [Google Scholar]
  54. von Hofsten C. 1980. Predictive reaching for moving objects by human infants. J. Exp. Child Psychol. 30:369–82 [Google Scholar]
  55. von Hofsten C, Fazel-Zandy S. 1984. Development of visually guided hand orientation in reaching. J. Exp. Child Psychol. 38:208–19 [Google Scholar]
  56. von Hofsten C, Ronnqvist L. 1988. Preparation for grasping an object: a developmental study. J. Exp. Psychol: Hum. Percept. Perform. 14:610–21 [Google Scholar]
  57. Want SC, Harris PL. 2001. Learning from other people's mistakes: causal understanding in learning to use a tool. Child Dev. 72:431–43 [Google Scholar]
  58. Wohldmann EL, Healy AF, Bourne LE. 2007. Pushing the limits of imagination: mental practice for learning sequences. J. Exp. Psychol.: Learn. Mem. Cogn. 33:254–61 [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error