1932

Abstract

In this article, we suggest that in starting from dialogical, interactive studies of human discourse, we can uncover properties of cooperation that have otherwise been missed or have remained underappreciated by scholars trying to account for cooperation from an evolutionary point of view or from the point of view of its mental representation (i.e., by means of collective intentions or goals). Before uncovering these properties, we argue that a distinction must be drawn between intersubjectivity, understood as an ever-present empathic sensitivity to others, and intersubjective attunement, the process of adjusting one's actions to the ever-changing contextual conditions of interaction. It is by attending to intersubjective attunement that cooperative activities are shown to be inherently vulnerable to breach, failure, and all kinds of interactional glitches, while also being open to modifications, e.g., repairs, that allow for their successful completion. Unpacking these conditions for cooperation allows us to reveal five general properties that guide its semiotic constitution, namely, sensorial access, distributed intentionality, fluctuation of attention, improvisation, and negotiable role ascription. Attention to the semiotics of cooperation across communities and within particular activities can add a sixth general property, namely, variability in how and the extent to which cooperation is acknowledged. We introduce the term cryptocooperation to describe joint activities where the cooperative role by certain participants is underrecognized and thereby remains hidden.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-anthro-041420-103556
2022-10-24
2024-04-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/anthro/51/1/annurev-anthro-041420-103556.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-anthro-041420-103556&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Arnold L. 2012a. Dialogic embodied action: using gesture to organize sequence and participation in instructional interaction. Res. Lang. Soc. Interact. 45:3269–96
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Arnold L. 2012b. Reproducing actions, reproducing power: local ideologies and everyday practices of participation at a California community bike shop. J. Linguist. Anthropol. 22:3137–58
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bakhtin MM. 1981. The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays transl. C Emerson, M Holquist Austin: Univ. Tex. Press
  4. Bakhtin MM. 1986. Speech Genres and Other Late Essays transl. VW McGee Austin: Univ. Tex. Press
  5. Barber AI. 2005. Chaining spaces. J. Linguist. Anthropol. 15:2194–217
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bauman R. 1986. Story, Performance, and Event: Contextual Studies of Oral Narrative Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  7. Besky S. 2016. The future of price: communicative infrastructures and the financialization of Indian tea. Cult. Anthropol. 31:14–29
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Blake A. 2012. Obama's ‘you didn't build that’ problem. Washington Post July 18. https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/the-fix/post/obamas-you-didnt-build-that-problem/2012/07/18/gJQAJxyotW_blog.html
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Bourdieu P. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice, transl. R Nice Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Boyd R, Gintis H, Bowles S 2010. Coordinated punishment of defectors sustains cooperation and can proliferate when rare. Science 328:617–20
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Bråten S 1998a. Intersubjective Communication and Emotion in Early Ontogeny. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  12. Bråten S. 1998b. Intersubjective communion and understanding: development and perturbation. See Bråten 1998a 372–82
  13. Bratman ME. 2009. Modest sociality and the distinctiveness of intention. Philos. Stud. 144:1149–65
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Briggs CL 1988. Narrative resources for the creation and mediation of conflict. Anthropol. Linguist. 30:3/4)
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Briggs CL, Bauman R. 1992. Genre, intertextuality, and social power. J. Linguist. Anthropol. 2:2131–72
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Brown P, Levinson SC. 1987. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  17. Chaumeil J-P. 2010. Des sons et des esprits-maîtres en Amazonie amérindienne. Ateliers du LESC 34: https://doi.org/10.4000/ateliers.8546
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  18. Choe H. 2019. Eating together multimodally: collaborative eating in mukbang, a Korean livestream of eating. Lang. Soc. 48:2171–208
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Chomsky N. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
  20. Cole M. 1985. The zone of proximal development: where culture and cognition create each other. Culture, Communication, and Cognition: Vygotskian Perspectives JV Wertsch 146–61 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Corsaro WA, Rizzo TA. 1988. Discussione and friendship: socialization processes in the peer culture of Italian nursery school children. Am. Sociol. Rev. 53:6879–94
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Darwin C 1871. The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex London: John Murray
  23. De Stefani E, Mondada L. 2018. Encounters in public space: how acquainted versus unacquainted persons establish social and spatial arrangements. Res. Lang. Soc. Interact. 51:3248–70
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Dunn CD. 2005. Pragmatic functions of humble forms in Japanese ceremonial discourse. J. Linguist. Anthropol. 15:2218–38
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Duranti A. 1984. Intentions, self, and local theories of meaning: words and social action in a Samoan context Tech. Rep. 122, Center Hum. Inf. Proc La Jolla, CA: http://www.sscnet.ucla.edu/anthro/faculty/duranti/reprints/intsel.pdf
  26. Duranti A. 1988. Intentions, language, and social action in a Samoan context. J. Pragmatics 12:113–33
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Duranti A. 1992. Language in context and language as context: the Samoan respect vocabulary. See Duranti & Goodwin 1992 77–99
  28. Duranti A. 1993. Intentions, self, and responsibility: an essay in Samoan ethnopragmatics. Responsibility and Evidence in Oral Discourse JH Hill, JT Irvine 24–47 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Duranti A. 2010. Husserl, intersubjectivity and anthropology. Anthropol. Theory 10:16–35
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Duranti A. 2015. The Anthropology of Intentions: Language in a World of Others Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  31. Duranti A 2022. Interactional glitches, cooperation, and the paradox of public joint activities. Re-Creating Anthropology: Sociality, Matter, and the Imagination DN Gellner, DP Martinez 71–92 London: Routledge
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Duranti A, Black SP 2012. Language socialization and verbal improvisation. The Handbook of Language Socialization A Duranti, E Ochs, BB Schieffelin 443–63 Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Duranti A, Brenneis D, eds. 1986. The audience as co-author. Text 6:3)
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Duranti A, Goodwin C, eds. 1992. Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  35. Duranti A, Ochs E. 1979. Left-dislocation in Italian conversation. See Givón 1979 377–416
  36. Duranti A, Ochs E 1986. Literacy instruction in a Samoan village. The Acquisition of Literacy: Ethnographic Perspectives BB Schieffelin, P Gilmore 213–32 Norwood, NJ: Ablex
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Edwards T. 2015. Bridging the gap between DeafBlind minds: interactional and social foundations of intention attribution in the Seattle DeafBlind community. Front. Psychol. 6:230–42
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Edwards T. 2018. Sign-creation in the Seattle DeafBlind community: a triumphant story about the regeneration of obviousness. Gesture 16:2304–27
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Enfield NJ 2014. Human agency and the infrastructure for requests. Requesting in Social Interaction P Drew, E Couper-Kuhlen 35–54 Amsterdam: John Benjamins
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Fatigante M, Liberati V, Pontecorvo C. 2010. Transitions in and out of games: how parents and children bracket game episodes at home. Res. Lang. Soc. Interact. 43:4346–71
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Feld S. 1982. Sound and Sentiment: Birds, Weeping, Poetics, and Song in Kaluli Expression Philadelphia: Univ. Pa. Press
  42. Feld S 1996. Waterfalls of song: an acoustemology of place resounding in Bosavi, Papua New Guinea. Senses of Place S Feld, KH Basso 91–135 Santa Fe, NM: Sch. Am. Res. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Feldman MS. 2000. Organizational routines as a source of continuous change. Organ. Sci. 11:6611–29
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Fessler DMT, Haley KJ. 2003. The strategy of affect: emotions in human cooperation. Genetic and Cultural Evolution of Cooperation P Hammerstein 7–36 Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Floyd S, Rossi G, Enfield NJ, eds. 2020. Getting Others to Do Things: A Pragmatic Typology of Recruitments Berlin: Lang. Sci. Press
  46. Ford CE, Thompson SA 1996. Interactional units in conversation: syntactic, intonational, and pragmatic resources for the management of turns. Interaction and Grammar E Ochs, EA Schegloff, SA Thompson 134–84 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Foster RJ. 2005. Commodity futures: labour, love and value. Anthropol. Today 21:48–12
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Foster RJ. 2007. The work of the new economy: consumers, brands, and value creation. Cult. Anthropol. 22:4707–31
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Galatolo R, Caronia L. 2018. Morality at dinnertime: the sense of the Other as a practical accomplishment in family interaction. Discourse Soc. 29:143–62
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Gan Y. 2021a.. ‘ Awww, she is feeding you’: Young children's (dis)engagement in video calls with their migrant parents. Res. Children Soc. Interact. 5:180–102
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Gan Y. 2021b. Capturing love at a distance: multisensoriality in intimate video calls between migrant parents and their left-behind children. Soc. Interact. 4:3 https://doi.org/10.7146/si.v4i3.128148
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  52. Gilbert M. 1987. Modelling collective belief. Synthese 73:1185–204
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Gilbert M. 1990. Walking together: a paradigmatic social phenomenon. MidWest Stud. Philos. 15:1–14
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Gilbert M. 2007. Collective intentions, commitment, and collective action problems. Rationality and Commitment F Peter, HB Schmid 258–79 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Givón T 1979. Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 12: Discourse and Syntax. New York: Academic
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Goffman E. 1963. Behavior in Public Spaces: Notes on the Social Organization of Gatherings New York: Free Press
  57. Goodwin C. 1979. The interactive construction of a sentence in natural conversation. Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology G Psathas 97–121 New York: Irvington
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Goodwin C. 1981. Conversational Organization: Interaction Between Speakers and Hearers New York: Academic
  59. Goodwin C 1984. Notes on story structure and the organization of participation. Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis JM Atkinson, J Heritage 225–46 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Goodwin C 2003. Conversational frameworks for the accomplishment of meaning in aphasia. Conversation and Brain Damage C Goodwin 90–116 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Goodwin C. 2018. Co-Operative Action New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  62. Goodwin C, Goodwin MH. 2004. Participation. A Companion to Linguistic Anthropology A Duranti 222–44 Malden, MA: Blackwell
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Goodwin C, Heritage J. 1990. Conversation analysis. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 19:283–307
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Goodwin MH. 1988. Cooperation and competition across girls’ play activities. Gender and Discourse: The Power of Talk AD Todd, S Fisher 55–94 Norwood, NJ: Ablex
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Graeber D, Wengrow D. 2021. The Dawn of Everything: A New History of Humanity New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux
  66. Grice P. 1989. Studies in the Way of Words Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  67. Griswold O. 2007. Achieving authority: discursive practices in Russian girls’ pretend play. Res. Lang. Soc. Interact. 40:4291–319
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Hallam E, Ingold T, eds. 2007. Creativity and Cultural Improvisation Oxford, UK: Berg
  69. Hallowell AI. 1969. Ojibwa ontology, behavior, and world view. Primitive Views of the World S Diamond 49–82 New York: Columbia Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Hanks WF. 1987. Discourse genres in a theory of practice. Am. Ethnol. 14:4668–92
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Harvey TS. 2014. Virtual worlds: an ethnomusicological perspective. The Oxford Handbook of Virtuality M Grimshaw 378–91 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Heritage J. 1984. Garfinkel and Ethnomethodology Cambridge, UK: Polity Press
  73. Hill JH. 1986. The refiguration of the anthropology of language. Reviewed work: Problems of Dostoevsky's Poetics by Mikhail Bakhtin, Caryl Emerson. Cult. Anthropol. 1:189–102
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Hill JH. 1996. The voices of Don Gabriel: responsibility and self in a modern Mexicano narrative. The Dialogic Emergence of Culture D Tedlock, B Mannheim 97–147 Urbana: Univ. Ill. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  75. Howard KM. 2007. Kinterm usage and hierarchy in Thai children's peer groups. J. Linguist. Anthropol. 17:2204–30
    [Google Scholar]
  76. Husserl E. 1960. Cartesian Meditations: An Introduction to Phenomenology transl. D Cairns The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff
  77. Husserl E. 1989. Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy. Second book: Studies in the Phenomenology of Constitution transl. R Rojcewicz, A Schuwer Dordrecht, Neth: Kluwer
    [Google Scholar]
  78. Hutchins E. 1991. Organizing work by adaptation. Organ. Sci. 2:114–39
    [Google Scholar]
  79. Irvine JT. 1974. Strategies of status manipulation in the Wolof greeting. Explorations in the Ethnography of Speaking R Bauman, J Sherzer 167–91 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  80. Jacoby S, Ochs E, eds. 1995. Co-construction. Res. Lang. Soc. Interact. 28:3)
    [Google Scholar]
  81. Jacquemet M. 2020. 45 as a bullshit artist: straining for charisma. Language in the Trump Era: Scandals and Emergencies J McIntosh, N Mendoza-Denton 124–36 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  82. Jones GM, Semel B, Le A 2015.. “ There's no rules. It's hackathon.”: negotiating commitment in a context of volatile sociality. J. Linguist. Anthropol. 25:3322–45
    [Google Scholar]
  83. Kataoka K. 2013.. “ We just don't get it right!”—multimodal competence for resolving spatial conflict in wayfinding discourse. Lang. Commun. 33:4404–19
    [Google Scholar]
  84. Katriel T. 1985. Brogez: ritual and strategy in Israeli children's conflicts. Lang. Soc. 14:4467–90
    [Google Scholar]
  85. Keenan EO. 1977. Making it last: repetition in children's discourse. Child Discourse S Ervin-Tripp, C Mitchell-Kernan 125–38 New York: Academic
    [Google Scholar]
  86. Keenan EO, Schieffelin BB. 1976. Foregrounding referents: a reconsideration of left-dislocation in discourse. Proceedings of the Second Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society H Thompson, K Whistler, V Edge, JJ Jaeger, R Javkin et al.240–57 Berkeley: Berkeley Linguist. Soc.
    [Google Scholar]
  87. Klein W, Goodwin MH. 2013. Chores. Fast-Forward Family: Home, Work, and Relationships in Middle-Class America E Ochs, T Kremer-Sadlik 111–29 Los Angeles: Univ. Calif. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  88. La Mattina NA 2022. Secret language as a “weapon of defense”: the problem of opacity in Italian colonial Libya. Signs Soc. 10:2191214
    [Google Scholar]
  89. Lakoff R. 1973. The logic of politeness: or, minding your P's and Q's. Chicago Linguist. Soc. 9:1292–305
    [Google Scholar]
  90. Lein L, Brenneis D 1978. Children's disputes in three speech communities. Lang. Soc. 7:3299–323
    [Google Scholar]
  91. Lerner GH. 1991. On the syntax of sentences-in-progress. Lang. Soc. 20:3441–58
    [Google Scholar]
  92. Lerner GH 2004. Collaborative turn sequences. Conversation Analysis: Studies from the First Generation GH Lerner 225–56 Amsterdam: Benjamins
    [Google Scholar]
  93. Levinson SC. 1983. Pragmatics Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  94. Lyon S. 2011. Coffee and Community: Maya Farmers and Fair-Trade Markets Boulder: Univ. Press Colo.
  95. Malinowski B. 1923. The problem of meaning in primitive languages. The Meaning of Meaning CK Ogden, IA Richards 296–336 London: K. Paul, Trend, Trubner
    [Google Scholar]
  96. McIlvenny P. 2014. Vélomobile formations-in-action: biking and talking together. Space Cult. 17:2137–56
    [Google Scholar]
  97. McIlvenny P, Broth M, Haddington P. 2014. Moving together: mobile formations in interaction. Space Cult. 17:2104–6
    [Google Scholar]
  98. Milner GB. 1961. The Samoan vocabulary of respect. J. R. Anthropol. Inst. G. B. Irel. 91:2296–317
    [Google Scholar]
  99. Mondada L. 2014. Bodies in action: multimodal analysis of walking and talking. Lang. Dialogue 4:3357–403
    [Google Scholar]
  100. Morrison JB. 2015. The problem with workarounds is that they work: the persistence of resource shortages. J. Oper. Manag. 39–40:79–91
    [Google Scholar]
  101. Ochs E. 1992. Indexing gender. See Duranti & Goodwin 1992 335–58
  102. Ochs E 1996. Linguistic resources for socializing humanity. Rethinking Linguistic Relativity JJ Gumperz, SC Levinson 407–37 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  103. Ochs E, Schieffelin BB 1984. Language acquisition and socialization: three developmental stories and their implications. Culture Theory: Essays in Mind, Self, and Emotion RA Shweder, RA LeVine 276–320 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  104. Ochs E, Schieffelin BB, Platt M 1979. Propositions across utterances and speakers. Developmental Pragmatics E Ochs, BB Schieffelin 251–68 New York: Academic
    [Google Scholar]
  105. Ortner SB, Whitehead H, eds. 1981. Sexual Meanings: The Cultural Construction of Gender and Sexuality Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  106. Pagliai V. 2010. Conflict, cooperation, and facework in Contrasto verbal duels. J. Linguist. Anthropol. 20:187–100
    [Google Scholar]
  107. Peacocke C. 2005. Joint attention: its nature, reflexivity, and relation to common knowledge. Joint Attention: Communication and Other Minds N Eilan, C Hoerl, T McCormack, J Roessler 298–324 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  108. Pedersen MA, Albris K, Seaver N. 2021. The political economy of attention. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 50:309–25
    [Google Scholar]
  109. Rakoczy H. 2006. Pretend play and the development of collective intentionality. Cognit. Syst. Res. 7:2–3113–27
    [Google Scholar]
  110. Rommetveit R. 1998. Intersubjective attunement and linguistically mediated meaning in discourse. See Bråten 1998a 354–71
  111. Russell K. 2020. Facing another: the attenuation of contact as space in Dhofar, Oman. Signs Soc. 8:2290–318
    [Google Scholar]
  112. Ryave AL, Schenkein JN 1974. Notes on the art of walking. Ethnomethodology: Selected Readings R Turner 265–74 Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin
    [Google Scholar]
  113. Sacks H. 1992. Lectures on Conversation Vols. 1 and 2 Oxford, UK: Blackwell
  114. Sacks H, Schegloff EA, Jefferson G 1974. A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50:4696–735
    [Google Scholar]
  115. Sawyer RK. 1995. Creativity as mediated action: a comparison of improvisational performance and product creativity. Mind Cult. Act. 2:3172–91
    [Google Scholar]
  116. Sawyer RK. 1996. The semiotics of improvisation: the pragmatics of musical and verbal performance. Semiotica 108:3/4269–306
    [Google Scholar]
  117. Sawyer RK. 2001. Creating Conversations: Improvisation in Everyday Discourse Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press
  118. Sawyer RK. 2003. Group Creativity: Music, Theater, Collaboration Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
  119. Schegloff EA. 1968. Sequencing in conversational openings. Am. Anthropol. 70:61075–95
    [Google Scholar]
  120. Schegloff EA. 1972. Notes on a conversational practice: formulating place. Studies in Social Interaction D Sudnow 75–119 New York: Free Press
    [Google Scholar]
  121. Schegloff EA. 1979. The relevance-of-repair to syntax-for-conversation. See Givón 1979 261–86
  122. Schegloff EA. 1986. The routine as achievement. Hum. Stud. 9:2111–51
    [Google Scholar]
  123. Schegloff EA. 1992. Repair after next turn: the last structurally provided defense of intersubjectivity in conversation. Am. J. Sociol. 97:51295–345
    [Google Scholar]
  124. Schegloff EA, Jefferson G, Sacks H 1977. The preference for self-correction in the organization of repair in conversation. Language 53:2361–82
    [Google Scholar]
  125. Schutz A. 1966. The problem of transcendental intersubjectivity in Husserl. Collected Papers, Vol. 3, Studies in Phenomenological Philosophy transl. F Kersten 51–83 The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff
    [Google Scholar]
  126. Searle JR 1990. Collective intentions and actions. Intentions in Communication PR Cohen, J Morgan, ME Pollack 401–15 Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press
    [Google Scholar]
  127. Simmons-Mackie N, Damico J. 1999. Social role negotiation in aphasia therapy: competence, incompetence, and conflict. Constructing (In)Competence: Disabling Evaluations in Clinical and Social Interaction D Kovarsky, M Maxwell, JF Duchan 313–42 Mahwah, NJ: Psychology Press
    [Google Scholar]
  128. Stépanoff C. 2012. Human-animal “joint commitment” in a reindeer herding system. HAU 2:2287–312
    [Google Scholar]
  129. Stépanoff C. 2017. The rise of reindeer pastoralism in Northern Eurasia: human and animal motivations entangled. J. R. Anthropol. Inst. 23:2376–97
    [Google Scholar]
  130. Stépanoff C, Marchina C, Fossier C, Bureau N. 2017. Animal autonomy and intermittent coexistences: North Asian modes of herding. Curr. Anthropol. 58:157–81
    [Google Scholar]
  131. Stivers T. 2008. Stance, alignment, and affiliation during storytelling: when nodding is a token of affiliation. Res. Lang. Soc. Interact. 41:131–57
    [Google Scholar]
  132. Stivers T. 2022. The Book of Answers: Alignment, Autonomy, and Affiliation in Social Interaction Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  133. Stivers T, Robinson JD 2006. A preference for progressivity in interaction. Lang. Soc. 35:3367–92
    [Google Scholar]
  134. Streeck J. 1980. Speech acts in interaction: a critique of Searle. Discourse Process. 3:2133–54
    [Google Scholar]
  135. Streeck J. 1983. Social Order in Child Communication: A Study in Microethnography Amsterdam: John Benjamins
  136. Streeck J. 1994. Gesture as communication II: the audience as co-author. Res. Lang. Soc. Interact. 27:3239–67
    [Google Scholar]
  137. Streeck J. 2015. Embodiment in human communication. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 44:419–38
    [Google Scholar]
  138. Tcherkézoff S. 2003. Faa-Samoa une identité polynésienne: L'Anthropologie comme dialogue culturel Paris: L'Harmattan
  139. Throop CJ, Duranti A. 2015. Attention, ritual glitches, and attentional pull: the president and the queen. Phenomenol. Cogn. Sci. 14:41055–82
    [Google Scholar]
  140. Trivers RL. 1971. The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Q. Rev. Biol. 46:135–57
    [Google Scholar]
  141. Tuomela R, Miller K. 1985. We-intentions and social action. Analyse Kritik 7:126–43
    [Google Scholar]
  142. Tuomela R, Miller K. 1988. We-intentions. Philos. Stud. 53:3367–89
    [Google Scholar]
  143. Vološinov VN. 1973. Marxism and the Philosophy of Language transl. L Matejka, IR Titunik Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  144. Vygotsky LS. 1978. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes transl. AR Luria, M Cole, M Lopez-Morillas Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  145. Watson-Gegeo KA. 1975. Transferable communicative routines: strategies and group identity in two speech events. Lang. Soc. 4:153–72
    [Google Scholar]
  146. Whorf BL. 1956. Language, Thought, and Reality Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press
  147. Zuckerman CHP. 2016. Phatic violence? Gambling and the arts of distraction in Laos. J. Linguist. Anthropol. 26:3294–314
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-anthro-041420-103556
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-anthro-041420-103556
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error