1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Anthropology
  4. Volume 51, 2022
  5. Article

Annual Review of Anthropology

Volume 51, 2022

Aesthetics in Styles and Variation: A Fresh Flavor

Abstract

Speaker attitudes, ascriptions, qualia, and other forms of overt aesthetic commentary function as constraints on language and culture and are central to sociolinguistics and linguistic anthropology. Despite the importance of aesthetics, sociolinguists studying variation and change have largely shied away from the topic. This review suggests that covert aesthetic evaluations play a role in variation and change. We draw on non-Western approaches to aesthetics ( and “everyday aesthetics”) that emphasize the interplay between receiver and the aesthetic stimulus. We present two case studies. One, from fieldwork on Nkep (an Oceanic language spoken in Vanuatu), draws attention to the way aesthetic factors seem to slow language change. The other, from fieldwork on Spanish in California, shows how aesthetic evaluations of linguistic features facilitate the transfer of variation in a situation of language contact.

Keyword(s): aesthetics, language variation, Latina, Latinx, style, Vanuatu
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-anthro-101819-110056
2022-10-24
2024-04-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/anthro/51/1/annurev-anthro-101819-110056.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-anthro-101819-110056&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Adomako K. 2015. Some phonological processes in an Akan linguistic game. Linguist. Online 72:3 https://doi.org/10.13092/lo.72.1970
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  2. Ambridge B. 2020. Against stored abstractions: a radical exemplar model of language acquisition. . First Lang 40:509–59
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Atkin A. 2013. Peirce's theory of signs. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy EN Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2013/entries/peirce-semiotics
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Barreto A. 2018. Ni santas ni putas, sólo mujeres: disrupting appropriate Latina femininity through raunch aesthetics on Instagram PhD Thesis, Univ. Or. Eugene:
  5. Benamou M. 2010. Rasa: Affect and Intuition in Javanese Musical Aesthetics Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  6. Biber D, Conrad SM, Reppen R, Byrd HP, Helt M et al. 2004. Representing Language Use in the University: Analysis of the TOEFL 2000 Spoken and Written Academic Language Corpus. Monogr. Ser. MS-25 Princeton, NJ: ETS/TOEFL
  7. Black SP. 2018. The ethics and aesthetics of care. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 47:79–95
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Bourdieu P. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  9. Bracknell C. 2020. The emotional business of Noongar song. J. Aust. Stud. 44:140–53
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Brøcker K, Drożdżowicz A, Schindler S 2020. Introduction. Linguistic Intuitions: Evidence and Method S Schindler, A Drożdżowicz, K Brøcker 1–9 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Burnett H. 2017. Sociolinguistic interaction and identify construction: the view from game-theoretic semantics. J. Socioling. 21:238–71
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Buson L, Nardy A, Muller D, Chevrot J-P. 2018. The sociolinguistic repetition task: a new paradigm for exploring the cognitive coherence of language varieties. Top. Cogn. Sci. 10:803–17
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Butt M, King TH, Niño M-E, Segond F. 1999. A Grammar Writer's Cookbook Stanford, CA: Cent. Study Lang. Inf.
  14. Campbell DT. 1958. Common fate, similarity, and other indices of the status of aggregates of persons as social entities. Behav. Sci. 3:14–25
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Caton S. 1990.. “ Peaks of Yemen I Summon”: Poetry as Cultural Practice in a North Yemeni Tribe Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
  16. Cavanaugh JR. 2020. Aesthetics. The International Encyclopedia of Linguistic Anthropology J Stanlaw 1–5 Hoboken, NJ: Wiley
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Cavanaugh JR, Shankar S, eds. 2017. Language and Materiality: Ethnographic and Theoretical Explorations Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  18. Chaudhury PJ. 1965. The theory of rasa. J. Aesthet. Art Crit. 24:1145–49
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Chomsky N. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
  20. Chumley LH, Harkness N. 2013. Evaluation regimes and the qualia of quality. Anthropol. Theory 13:1/2169–83
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Corballis M. 2017. The Truth About Language Auckland, N. Z.: Univ. Auckland Press
  22. Devitt M. 2006. Intuitions in linguistics. Br. J. Philos. Sci. 57:3481–513
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Diffloth G. 1972. Notes on expressive meaning. Papers from the 8th Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society440–47 Chicago: Chicago Linguist. Soc.
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Diffloth G. 2001. Les expressifs du Surin et où cela conduit. Bull. Ec. Fr. Extrême-Orient 88:261–69
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Dodsworth R, Benton R. 2019. Language Variation and Change in Social Networks: A Bipartite Approach London: Routledge
  26. Drager K. 2010. Sociophonetic variation in speech production. Lang. Linguist. Compass 4:7473–80
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Drechsel EJ. 2010. Wilhelm von Humboldt and Edward Sapir: analogies and homologies in their linguistic thought. Honor of Mary Haas: From the Haas Festival Conference on Native American Linguistics W Shipley 225–64 Berlin: de Gruyter
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Eckert P. 2018. Meaning and Linguistic Variation: The Third Wave in Sociolinguistics New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  29. Faudree P. 2013. Singing for the Dead: The Politics of Indigenous Revival in Mexico Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press
  30. Fischer K 2006. Approaches to Discourse Particles Amsterdam: Elsevier
  31. Gahl S, Yu ACL. 2006. Introduction to the special issue on exemplar-based models in linguistics. Linguist. Rev. 23:3213–16
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Gal S. 2013. Tastes of talk: qualia and the moral flavor of signs. Anthropol. Theory 13:1/231–48
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Gamio M. 1930. Mexican Immigration to the United States Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
  34. Goodwin MH. 2006. The Hidden Life of Girls: Games of Stance, Status and Exclusion Oxford, UK: Blackwell
  35. Green J, Turpin M. 2013. If you go down to the soak today: symbolism and structure in an Arandic children's story. Anthropol. Linguist. 55:358–94
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Grieve P, Hogg MA. 1999. Subjective uncertainty and intergroup discrimination in the minimal group situation. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 25:926–40
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Grosz BJ, Joshi AK, Weinstein S. 1995. Centering: a framework for modeling the local coherence of discourse. Comput. Linguist. 21:203–25
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Haas MR. 1957. Thai word games. J. Am. Folk. 70:276173–75
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Haegeman L. 2014. West Flemish verb-based discourse markers and the articulation of the speech act layer. Stud. Linguist. 68:1116–39
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Haiman J. 2014. Decorative morphology in Khmer. See Williams 2014 61–82
  41. Hale K. 1984. Remarks on creativity in Aboriginal verse. Problems and Solutions: Occasional Essays in Musicology Presented to Alice M. Moyle JC Kassler, J Stubbington 254–62 Sydney: Hale & Iremonger
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Hanks W. 1987. Discourse genres in a theory of practice. Am. Ethnol. 4:4668–92
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Harkness N. 2015. The pragmatics of qualia in practice. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 44:573–89
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Haupt A, Williams QE, Alim HS. 2018. Introduction: hip hop, en-voicing and agency. J. World Pop. Music 5:147–51
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Hegel GWF. 1920a. The Philosophy of Fine Art (Hegel's Aesthetik), Vol. 1, transl. F Plumptre Beresford Osmaston London: G. Bell & Sons (from German)
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Hegel GWF. 1920b. The Philosophy of Fine Art (Hegel's Aesthetik), Vol. 4, transl. F Plumptre Beresford Osmaston London: G. Bell & Sons (from German)
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Hill JH. 1985. The grammar of consciousness and the consciousness of grammar. Am. Ethnol. 12:4725–37
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Holland D, Leander K. 2004. Ethnographic studies of positioning and subjectivity: an introduction. Ethos 32:127–39
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Huizinga J. 1950. Homo Ludens: A Study of the Play-Element in Culture London: Routledge/Kegan Paul
  50. Hume D. 1910. 1757. Of the standard of taste. English Essays from Sir Philip Sidney to Macaulay CW Eliot 215–36 London: Collier
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Hymes D. 2016. “In Vain I Tried to Tell You”: Essays in Native American Ethnopoetics Philadelphia: Univ. Pa. Press
  52. Ingalls DHH 1990. The Dhvanyloka of nandavardhana with the Locana of Abhinavagupta, transl DHH Ingalls, J Moussaieff Masson, MV Patwardhan Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press (from Sanskrit)
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Inkelas S, Downing LJ. 2015. What is reduplication? Typology and analysis. Part 1/2: The typology of reduplication. Lang. Linguist. Compass 9:12502–15
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Jakobson R, Taylor M, Waugh L. 2011. The Sound Shape of Language Berlin/Boston: de Gruyter. , 3rd ed..
  55. Johnson K 2007. Decisions and mechanisms in exemplar-based phonology. Experimental Approaches to Phonology M-J Sole, PS Beddor, M Ohala 25–40 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Kant I. 2000. 1790. Critique of the Power of Judgment, transl P Guyer, E Matthews Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press (from German)
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Kroskrity PV. 2004. Language ideologies. A Companion to Linguistic Anthropology A Duranti 496–517 Malden, MA: Blackwell
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Kroskrity PV. 2010. Language ideologies—evolving perspectives. Soc. Lang. Use 7:192–205
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Kroskrity PV. 2020. Theorizing linguistic racisms from a language ideological perspective. The Oxford Handbook of Language and Race HS Alim, A Reyes, PV Kroskrity 68–89 New York: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  60. La Banda Peña 2016. El narco cholo https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3edgq9VK7TM .
  61. Labov W. 1969. Contraction, deletion, and inherent variability of the English copula. Language 45:4715–62
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Labov W. 1972. Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia: Univ. Pa. Press
  63. Labov W. 2019. What has been built on empirical foundations. New Directions for Historical Linguistics HC Boas, M Pierce 42–57 Leiden, Neth: Brill
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Ladefoged P, Johnson K 2011. A Course in Phonetics Boston: Cengage. , 6th ed..
  65. Leal L. 1977. Octavio Paz and the Chicano. Lat. Am. Lit. Rev. 5:10115–23
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Lee N. 2021. Style variation in the second formant: What does it mean to be “refined” in Baba Malay?. Lang. Ecol. 4:1115–30
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Levon E, Buchstaller I 2015. Perception, cognition, and linguistic structure: the effect of linguistic modularity and cognitive style on sociolinguistic processing. Lang. Var. Change 27:319–48
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Lutz C. 1986. Emotion, thought, and estrangement: emotion as a cultural category. Cult. Anthropol. 1:287–309
     [Google Scholar]
  69. Malinowski B. 1965. The language of magic and gardening. Coral Gardens and Their Magic, Vol. 2: Soil-Tilling and Agricultural Rites in the Trobriand Islands Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  70. Mendoza-Denton N. 2008. Homegirls: Language and Cultural Practice Among Latina Youth Gangs Oxford, UK: Blackwell
  71. Mendoza-Denton N. 2011. The semiotic hitchhiker's guide to creaky voice: circulation and gendered hardcore in a Chicana/o gang persona. J. Linguist. Anthropol. 21:2261–80
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Meyer D. 2013. Early Tahitian Poetics Berlin/Boston: Mouton de Gruyter
  73. Meyerhoff M. 2015. Turning variation on its head: analysing subject prefixes in Nkep (Vanuatu) for language documentation. Asia-Pac. Lang. Var. 1:79–109
     [Google Scholar]
  74. Meyerhoff M. 2017. Writing a linguistic symphony: analysing variation while doing language documentation. Can. J. Linguist./Rev. Can. Linguist 62:4525–49
     [Google Scholar]
  75. Moland LL. 2019. Hegel's Aesthetics: The Art of Idealism Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  76. Monsiváis C. 2020. 1985. Cholos y pachucos: la materialización de una estética. Carlos Monsiváis en la Frontera: Tan Cerca, Tan Lejos L Sarabia 93–99 Tijuana, Mex: La Rumorosa/Gob. Baja Calif.
     [Google Scholar]
  77. Morris H. 2017. Playful Chardin. Disclosures: Essays on Art, Literature, and Philosophy287–343. Seattle, WA: CreateSpace
     [Google Scholar]
  78. Mous M, Barasa S. 2022. Kenya: Sheng and Engsh. Urban Contact Languages and Language Change: Insights from the Global North and South P Kerswill, H Wiese 105–24 Abingdon, UK: Routledge
     [Google Scholar]
  79. Musgrave S. 2006. Complex emotion predicates in eastern Indonesia: evidence for language contact?. Linguistic Areas: Convergence in Historical and Typological Perspective Y Matras, A McMahon, N Vincent 227–43 New York: Palgrave Macmillan
     [Google Scholar]
  80. Nassenstein N. 2022. Democratic Republic of the Congo: lingala ya Bayankee/Yanké. Urban Contact Languages and Language Change: Insights from the Global North and South P Kerswill, H Wiese 28–46 Abingdon, UK: Routledge
     [Google Scholar]
  81. Nishi A. 1999. The introduction of aesthetics: Nishi Amano. Modern Japanese Aesthetics: A Reader, ed./ transl. MF Marra 17–37 Honolulu: Univ. Hawaiʻi Press (from Japanese)
     [Google Scholar]
  82. O'Dubhda F. 2009. On the musical patterning of sculpted words: exploring the relationship between melody and metre in a Somali poetic form. Afr. Music 8:97–116
     [Google Scholar]
  83. Okakura K. 1999. Hegelian reversal: Okakura Kakuz. Modern Japanese Aesthetics: A Reader /transl. MF Marra 65–78 Honolulu: Univ. Hawaiʻi Press (from Japanese)
     [Google Scholar]
  84. Palmer SE, Schloss KB, Sammartino J. 2013. Visual aesthetics and human preference. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 64:77–107
     [Google Scholar]
  85. Pawley A. 2010. Helter skelter and ñugl ñagl: English and Kalam rhyming jingles and the psychic unity of mankind. In A Mosaic of Languages and Cultures: Studies Celebrating the Career of Karl J. Franklin KA McElhanon, G Reesink 273–93 Dallas, TX: SIL Int.
     [Google Scholar]
  86. Pawley A, Syder FH. 1983. Two puzzles for linguistic theory: nativelike selection and nativelike fluency. Language and Communication JC Richards, RW Schmidt 191–225 London: Longman
     [Google Scholar]
  87. Paz O. 1973. 1959. El pachuco y otros extremos. El Laberinto de la Soledad9–25 Madrid: Cátedra
     [Google Scholar]
  88. Peterson DA. 2014. Aesthetic aspects of Khumi grammar. See Williams 2014 219–36
  89. Podesva RJ. 2006. Intonational variation and social meaning: categorical and phonetic aspects. Univ. Pa. Work. Pap. Linguist 12:215
     [Google Scholar]
  90. Pollock SI, ed./transl. 2016. A Rasa Reader: Classical Indian Aesthetics New York: Columbia Univ. Press (from Sanskrit)
  91. Prakorb P-N. 1993. The problem of aspirates in Central Khmer and Northern Khmer. Mon-Khmer Stud 22:251–56
     [Google Scholar]
  92. Preston DR, Niedzielski N. 2010. A Reader in Sociophonetics Berlin: de Gruyter
  93. Proyecto40 Informativo 2011. Cholas del Valle de Chalco Broadcast, TV Azteca, April 15. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sju61mjrYKM
  94. Ramírez CS. 2009. The Woman in the Zoot Suit: Gender, Nationalism, and the Cultural Politics of Memory Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press
  95. Rickford JR, Rickford AE. 1976. Cut-eye and suck-teeth: African words and gestures in New World guise. J. Am. Folk. 89:353294–309
     [Google Scholar]
  96. Saito Y. 2007. Everyday Aesthetics Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  97. Sánchez Valencia A 2005. Octavio Paz y el extremo del mexicano en el pachuco. Tema Var 24:169–86
     [Google Scholar]
  98. Sankoff G. 1980. The Social Life of Language Philadelphia: Univ. Pa. Press
  99. Sapir E 2002. The Psychology of Culture: A Course of Lectures JT Irvine Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. , 2nd ed..
  100. Sapir E. 2014. 1927. Form in language: grammatical processes. Language: An Introduction to the Study of Speech57–81 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  101. Schieffelin B. 2008. Tok bokis, tok piksa: translating parables in Papua New Guinea. Social Lives in Language: Sociolinguistics and Multilingual Speech Communities (Celebrating the Work of Gillian Sankoff) M Meyerhoff, N Nagy 111–34 Amsterdam: Benjamins
     [Google Scholar]
  102. von Schiller F 1910. Letters upon the aesthetic education of man. Literary and Philosophical Essays: French, German and Italian with Introduction and Notes CW Eliot 221–313 New York: Collier
     [Google Scholar]
  103. Schlee G, Shongolo AA. 1996. Oromo nationalist poetry: Jarso Waaqo Qooto's tape recording about political events in Southern Oromia, 1991. Afr. Lang. Cult. 3:Suppl229–42
     [Google Scholar]
  104. Silverstein M. 1977. Cultural prerequisites to grammatical analysis. Linguistics and Anthropology: Georgetown University Round Table on Languages and Linguistics M Saville-Troike 139–51 Washington, DC: Georgetown Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  105. Silverstein M. 2003. Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Lang. Commun. 23:193–229
     [Google Scholar]
  106. Stanford JN. 2014. Lexicalized poetry in Sui. See Williams 2014 151–66
  107. Steedman M. 2000. The Syntactic Process Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
  108. Strycharz-Banaś A. 2016. In-group marker going out: meaning-making in a community of practice. Lang. Soc 45665–84
  109. Tatman R. 2021. Phonetic variation in dialects. Similar Languages, Varieties, and Dialects: A Computational Perspective M Zampieri, P Nakov 17–26 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  110. Turpin M, Fabb N. 2017. Brilliance as cognitive complexity in Aboriginal Australia. Oceania 87:209–30
     [Google Scholar]
  111. Vasconcelos J. 1957. 1936. Asoma el pochismo. La Tormenta73–77 Mexico City: Libr. Mex. Unidos
     [Google Scholar]
  112. Warren P. 2012. Introducing Psycholinguistics Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  113. Wasow T, Arnold J 2005. Intuitions in linguistic argumentation. Lingua 115:1481–96
     [Google Scholar]
  114. Watkins J. 2014. Grammatical aesthetics in Wa. See Williams 2014 99–117
  115. Webster A. 2015. Intimate Grammars: An Ethnography of Navajo Poetry Tucson: Univ. Ariz. Press
  116. White G. 1986. Conceptual universals in interpersonal language. Am. Anthropol. 82:759–81
     [Google Scholar]
  117. Williams JP 2014. The Aesthetics of Grammar: Sound and Meaning in the Languages of Mainland Southeast Asia Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  118. Woolard KA 1998. Language ideology as a field of inquiry. Language Ideologies: Practice and Theory BB Schieffelin, KA Woolard, PV Kroskrity 20–86 New York: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  119. Wray A. 2008. Formulaic Language: Pushing the Boundaries Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-anthro-101819-110056
Loading
Aesthetics in Styles and Variation: A Fresh Flavor
Annual Review of Anthropology 51, 103 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-101819-110056
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-anthro-101819-110056
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-anthro-101819-110056
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error