Data Integration for Immunology

Literature Cited

1. 1. 

   Thorsson V, Gibbs DL, Brown SD, Wolf D, Bortone DS et al. 2018. The immune landscape of cancer. Immunity 48:4812–30.e14
   [Google Scholar]
2. 2. 

   Fernandez DM, Rahman AH, Fernandez NF, Chudnovskiy A, Amir ED et al. 2019. Single-cell immune landscape of human atherosclerotic plaques. Nat. Med. 25:101576–88
   [Google Scholar]
3. 3. 

   Davis MM, Tato CM, Furman D 2017. Systems immunology: just getting started. Nat. Immunol. 18:7725–32
   [Google Scholar]
4. 4. 

   Patin E, Hasan M, Bergstedt J, Rouilly V, Libri V et al. 2018. Natural variation in the parameters of innate immune cells is preferentially driven by genetic factors. Nat. Immunol. 19:3302–14
   [Google Scholar]
5. 5. 

   Liston A, Goris A. 2018. The origins of diversity in human immunity. Nat. Immunol. 19:3209–10
   [Google Scholar]
6. 6. 

   Schultze JL. 2015. Teaching “big data” analysis to young immunologists. Nat. Immunol. 16:902–5
   [Google Scholar]
7. 7. 

   Good Z, Glanville J, Gee MH, Davis MM, Khatri P 2019. Computational and systems immunology: a student's perspective. Trends Immunol 40:8665–68
   [Google Scholar]
8. 8. 

   Kidd BA, Peters LA, Schadt EE, Dudley JT 2014. Unifying immunology with informatics and multiscale biology. Nat. Immunol. 15:2118–27
   [Google Scholar]
9. 9. 

   Baranzini SE, Khankhanian P, Patsopoulos NA, Li M, Stankovich J et al. 2013. Network-based multiple sclerosis pathway analysis with GWAS data from 15,000 cases and 30,000 controls. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 92:6854–65
   [Google Scholar]
10. 10. 

    Martin J-E, Assassi S, Diaz-Gallo L-M, Broen JC, Simeon CP et al. 2013. A systemic sclerosis and systemic lupus erythematosus pan-meta-GWAS reveals new shared susceptibility loci. Hum. Mol. Genet. 22:194021–29
    [Google Scholar]
11. 11. 

    Stahl EA, Raychaudhuri S, Remmers EF, Xie G, Eyre S et al. 2010. Genome-wide association study meta-analysis identifies seven new rheumatoid arthritis risk loci. Nat. Genet. 42:6508–14
    [Google Scholar]
12. 12. 

    Simeonov DR, Gowen BG, Boontanrart M, Roth TL, Gagnon JD et al. 2017. Discovery of stimulation-responsive immune enhancers with CRISPR activation. Nature 549:7670111–15
    [Google Scholar]
13. 13. 

    Kennedy AE, Ozbek U, Dorak MT 2017. What has GWAS done for HLA and disease associations. ? Int. J. Immunogenet. 44:5195–211
    [Google Scholar]
14. 14. 

    Trowsdale J, Knight JC. 2013. Major histocompatibility complex genomics and human disease. Annu. Rev. Genom. Hum. Genet. 14:301–23
    [Google Scholar]
15. 15. 

    Horton R, Gibson R, Coggill P, Miretti M, Allcock RJ et al. 2008. Variation analysis and gene annotation of eight MHC haplotypes: the MHC Haplotype Project. Immunogenetics 60:11–18
    [Google Scholar]
16. 16. 

    Unanue ER, Turk V, Neefjes J 2016. Variations in MHC class II antigen processing and presentation in health and disease. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 34:265–97
    [Google Scholar]
17. 17. 

    Sirota M, Schaub MA, Batzoglou S, Robinson WH, Butte AJ 2009. Autoimmune disease classification by inverse association with SNP alleles. PLOS Genet 5:12e1000792
    [Google Scholar]
18. 18. 

    Mailman MD, Feolo M, Jin Y, Kimura M, Tryka K et al. 2007. The NCBI dbGaP database of genotypes and phenotypes. Nat. Genet. 39:101181–86
    [Google Scholar]
19. 19. 

    Buniello A, MacArthur JAL, Cerezo M, Harris LW, Hayhurst J et al. 2019. The NHGRI-EBI GWAS Catalog of published genome-wide association studies, targeted arrays and summary statistics 2019. Nucleic Acids Res 47:D1D1005–12
    [Google Scholar]
20. 20. 

    Bycroft C, Freeman C, Petkova D, Band G, Elliott LT et al. 2018. The UK Biobank resource with deep phenotyping and genomic data. Nature 562:7726203–9
    [Google Scholar]
21. 21. 

    Mingueneau M, Kreslavsky T, Gray D, Heng T, Cruse R et al. 2013. The transcriptional landscape of αβ T cell differentiation. Nat. Immunol. 14:6619
    [Google Scholar]
22. 22. 

    Newman AM, Liu CL, Green MR, Gentles AJ, Feng W et al. 2015. Robust enumeration of cell subsets from tissue expression profiles. Nat. Methods 12:5453–57
    [Google Scholar]
23. 23. 

    Aran D, Hu Z, Butte AJ 2017. xCell: digitally portraying the tissue cellular heterogeneity landscape. Genome Biol 18:1220
    [Google Scholar]
24. 24. 

    Stewart PA, Welsh EA, Slebos RJC, Fang B, Izumi V et al. 2019. Proteogenomic landscape of squamous cell lung cancer. Nat. Commun. 10:3578
    [Google Scholar]
25. 25. 

    Kim IS, Gao Y, Welte T, Wang H, Liu J et al. 2019. Immuno-subtyping of breast cancer reveals distinct myeloid cell profiles and immunotherapy resistance mechanisms. Nat. Cell Biol. 21:91113–26
    [Google Scholar]
26. 26. 

    Kim-Hellmuth S, Bechheim M, Pütz B, Mohammadi P, Nédélec Y et al. 2017. Genetic regulatory effects modified by immune activation contribute to autoimmune disease associations. Nat. Commun. 8:1266
    [Google Scholar]
27. 27. 

    Vora B, Wang A, Kosti I, Huang H, Paranjpe I et al. 2018. Meta-analysis of maternal and fetal transcriptomic data elucidates the role of adaptive and innate immunity in preterm birth. Front. Immunol. 9:933
    [Google Scholar]
28. 28. 

    Barrett T, Wilhite SE, Ledoux P, Evangelista C, Kim IF et al. 2013. NCBI GEO: archive for functional genomics data sets—update. Nucleic Acids Res 41:D1D991–95
    [Google Scholar]
29. 29. 

    Heng TSP, Painter MW 2008. The Immunological Genome Project: networks of gene expression in immune cells. Nat. Immunol 9:101091–94
    [Google Scholar]
30. 30. 

    Rotival M. 2019. Characterising the genetic basis of immune response variation to identify causal mechanisms underlying disease susceptibility. HLA 94:3275–84
    [Google Scholar]
31. 31. 

    Buenrostro J, Wu B, Chang H, Greenleaf W 2015. ATAC-seq: a method for assaying chromatin accessibility genome-wide. Curr. Protoc. Mol. Biol. 109:21.29.1–9
    [Google Scholar]
32. 32. 

    Li Y, Tollefsbol TO. 2011. DNA methylation detection: Bisulfite genomic sequencing analysis. Methods Mol. Biol. 791:11–21
    [Google Scholar]
33. 33. 

    Barski A, Cuddapah S, Cui K, Roh T-Y, Schones DE et al. 2007. High-resolution profiling of histone methylations in the human genome. Cell 129:4823–37
    [Google Scholar]
34. 34. 

    Johnson DS, Mortazavi A, Myers RM, Wold B 2007. Genome-wide mapping of in vivo protein-DNA interactions. Science 316:58301497–502
    [Google Scholar]
35. 35. 

    Calderon D, Nguyen MLT, Mezger A, Kathiria A, Müller F et al. 2019. Landscape of stimulation-responsive chromatin across diverse human immune cells. Nat. Genet. 51:1494–505
    [Google Scholar]
36. 36. 

    ENCODE Proj. Consort 2012. An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome. Nature 489:741457–74
    [Google Scholar]
37. 37. 

    Moskowitz DM, Zhang DW, Hu B, Saux SL, Yanes RE et al. 2017. Epigenomics of human CD8 T cell differentiation and aging. Sci. Immunol. 2:8eaag0192
    [Google Scholar]
38. 38. 

    Yu B, Zhang K, Milner JJ, Toma C, Chen R et al. 2017. Epigenetic landscapes reveal transcription factors that regulate CD8⁺ T cell differentiation. Nat. Immunol. 18:5573–82
    [Google Scholar]
39. 39. 

    Farh KK-H, Marson A, Zhu J, Kleinewietfeld M, Housley WJ et al. 2015. Genetic and epigenetic fine mapping of causal autoimmune disease variants. Nature 518:7539337–43
    [Google Scholar]
40. 40. 

    Davis CA, Hitz BC, Sloan CA, Chan ET, Davidson JM et al. 2018. The Encyclopedia of DNA elements (ENCODE): data portal update. Nucleic Acids Res 46:D1D794–801
    [Google Scholar]
41. 41. 

    Heather JM, Ismail M, Oakes T, Chain B 2018. High-throughput sequencing of the T-cell receptor repertoire: pitfalls and opportunities. Brief. Bioinform. 19:4554–65
    [Google Scholar]
42. 42. 

    Georgiou G, Ippolito GC, Beausang J, Busse CE, Wardemann H, Quake SR 2014. The promise and challenge of high-throughput sequencing of the antibody repertoire. Nat. Biotechnol. 32:2158–68
    [Google Scholar]
43. 43. 

    Schroeder HW. 2006. Similarity and divergence in the development and expression of the mouse and human antibody repertoires. Dev. Comp. Immunol. 30:1–2119–35
    [Google Scholar]
44. 44. 

    Davis MM, Bjorkman PJ. 1988. T-cell antigen receptor genes and T-cell recognition. Nature 334:6181395–402
    [Google Scholar]
45. 45. 

    Elhanati Y, Sethna Z, Callan CG, Mora T, Walczak AM 2018. Predicting the spectrum of TCR repertoire sharing with a data-driven model of recombination. Immunol. Rev. 284:1167–79
    [Google Scholar]
46. 46. 

    Yaari G, Kleinstein SH. 2015. Practical guidelines for B-cell receptor repertoire sequencing analysis. Genome Med 7:121
    [Google Scholar]
47. 47. 

    Shugay M, Bagaev DV, Turchaninova MA, Bolotin DA, Britanova OV et al. 2015. VDJtools: unifying post-analysis of T cell receptor repertoires. PLOS Comput. Biol. 11:11e1004503
    [Google Scholar]
48. 48. 

    López-Santibáñez-Jácome L, Avendaño-Vázquez SE, Flores-Jasso CF 2019. The pipeline repertoire for Ig-Seq analysis. Front. Immunol. 10:899
    [Google Scholar]
49. 49. 

    Bradley P, Thomas PG. 2019. Using T cell receptor repertoires to understand the principles of adaptive immune recognition. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 37:547–70
    [Google Scholar]
50. 50. 

    Bashford-Rogers RJM, Palser AL, Huntly BJ, Rance R, Vassiliou GS et al. 2013. Network properties derived from deep sequencing of human B-cell receptor repertoires delineate B-cell populations. Genome Res 23:111874–84
    [Google Scholar]
51. 51. 

    Pineda S, Sigdel TK, Liberto JM, Vincenti F, Sirota M, Sarwal MM 2019. Characterizing pre-transplant and post-transplant kidney rejection risk by B cell immune repertoire sequencing. Nat. Commun. 10:1906
    [Google Scholar]
52. 52. 

    von Büdingen H-C, Kuo TC, Sirota M, van Belle CJ, Apeltsin L et al. 2012. B cell exchange across the blood–brain barrier in multiple sclerosis. J. Clin. Investig. 122:124533–43
    [Google Scholar]
53. 53. 

    Palanichamy A, Apeltsin L, Kuo TC, Sirota M, Wang S et al. 2014. Immunoglobulin class-switched B cells form an active immune axis between CNS and periphery in multiple sclerosis. Sci. Transl. Med. 6:248248ra106
    [Google Scholar]
54. 54. 

    Strauli NB, Hernandez RD. 2016. Statistical inference of a convergent antibody repertoire response to influenza vaccine. Genome Med 8:160
    [Google Scholar]
55. 55. 

    Roskin KM, Simchoni N, Liu Y, Lee J-Y, Seo K et al. 2015. IgH sequences in common variable immune deficiency reveal altered B cell development and selection. Sci. Transl. Med. 7:302302ra135
    [Google Scholar]
56. 56. 

    Dash P, Fiore-Gartland AJ, Hertz T, Wang GC, Sharma S et al. 2017. Quantifiable predictive features define epitope-specific T cell receptor repertoires. Nature 547:766189–93
    [Google Scholar]
57. 57. 

    Glanville J, Huang H, Nau A, Hatton O, Wagar LE et al. 2017. Identifying specificity groups in the T cell receptor repertoire. Nature 547:766194–98
    [Google Scholar]
58. 58. 

    Gowthaman R, Pierce BG 2019. TCR3d: The T cell receptor structural repertoire database. Bioinformatics 35:5323–25
    [Google Scholar]
59. 59. 

    Iglesia MD, Parker JS, Hoadley KA, Serody JS, Perou CM, Vincent BG 2016. Genomic analysis of immune cell infiltrates across 11 tumor types. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 108:11djw144
    [Google Scholar]
60. 60. 

    Leinonen R, Sugawara H, Shumway M 2011. The Sequence Read Archive. Nucleic Acids Res 39:D19–21
    [Google Scholar]
61. 61. 

    Rubelt F, Busse CE, Bukhari SAC, Bürckert J-P, Mariotti-Ferrandiz E et al. 2017. Adaptive Immune Receptor Repertoire Community recommendations for sharing immune-repertoire sequencing data. Nat. Immunol. 18:121274–78
    [Google Scholar]
62. 62. 

    Bhattacharya S, Dunn P, Thomas CG, Smith B, Schaefer H et al. 2018. ImmPort, toward repurposing of open access immunological assay data for translational and clinical research. Sci. Data 5:180015
    [Google Scholar]
63. 63. 

    Zhang W, Wang L, Liu K, Wei X, Yang K et al. 2020. PIRD: Pan Immune Repertoire Database. Bioinformatics 36:897–903
    [Google Scholar]
64. 64. 

    Caporaso JG, Kuczynski J, Stombaugh J, Bittinger K, Bushman FD et al. 2010. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat. Methods 7:5335–36
    [Google Scholar]
65. 65. 

    Edgar RC. 2013. UPARSE: highly accurate OTU sequences from microbial amplicon reads. Nat. Methods 10:10996–98
    [Google Scholar]
66. 66. 

    Lloyd-Price J, Arze C, Ananthakrishnan AN, Schirmer M, Avila-Pacheco J et al. 2019. Multi-omics of the gut microbial ecosystem in inflammatory bowel diseases. Nature 569:7758655–62
    [Google Scholar]
67. 67. 

    Theriot CM, Young VB. 2015. Interactions between the gastrointestinal microbiome and Clostridium difficile. Annu. Rev. . Microbiol 69:445–61
    [Google Scholar]
68. 68. 

    Relman DA, Lipsitch M. 2018. Microbiome as a tool and a target in the effort to address antimicrobial resistance. PNAS 115:5112902–10
    [Google Scholar]
69. 69. 

    Dumas A, Corral D, Colom A, Levillain F, Peixoto A et al. 2018. The host microbiota contributes to early protection against lung colonization by Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Front. . Immunol 9:2656
    [Google Scholar]
70. 70. 

    Chiu L, Bazin T, Truchetet M-E, Schaeverbeke T, Delhaes L, Pradeu T 2017. Protective microbiota: from localized to long-reaching co-immunity. Front. Immunol. 8:1678
    [Google Scholar]
71. 71. 

    Ding Y-H, Qian L-Y, Pang J, Lin J-Y, Xu Q et al. 2017. The regulation of immune cells by Lactobacilli: a potential therapeutic target for anti-atherosclerosis therapy. Oncotarget 8:3559915–28
    [Google Scholar]
72. 72. 

    Duvallet C, Gibbons SM, Gurry T, Irizarry RA, Alm EJ 2017. Meta-analysis of gut microbiome studies identifies disease-specific and shared responses. Nat. Commun. 8:11784
    [Google Scholar]
73. 73. 

    Turnbaugh PJ, Ley RE, Hamady M, Fraser-Liggett CM, Knight R, Gordon JI 2007. The Human Microbiome Project. Nature 449:7164804–10
    [Google Scholar]
74. 74. 

    Integr. HMP (iHMP) Res. Netw. Consort 2019. The Integrative Human Microbiome Project. Nature 569:7758641–48
    [Google Scholar]
75. 75. 

    McDonald D, Hyde E, Debelius JW, Morton JT, Gonzalez A et al. 2018. American Gut: an open platform for citizen science microbiome research. mSystems 3:3e00031–18
    [Google Scholar]
76. 76. 

    Grosselin K, Durand A, Marsolier J, Poitou A, Marangoni E et al. 2019. High-throughput single-cell ChIP-seq identifies heterogeneity of chromatin states in breast cancer. Nat. Genet. 51:61060–66
    [Google Scholar]
77. 77. 

    Buenrostro JD, Corces MR, Lareau CA, Wu B, Schep AN et al. 2018. Integrated single-cell analysis maps the continuous regulatory landscape of human hematopoietic differentiation. Cell 173:61535–48.e16
    [Google Scholar]
78. 78. 

    Blainey PC, Quake SR. 2014. Dissecting genomic diversity, one cell at a time. Nat. Methods 11:19–21
    [Google Scholar]
79. 79. 

    Jaitin DA, Weiner A, Yofe I, Lara-Astiaso D, Keren-Shaul H et al. 2016. Dissecting immune circuits by linking CRISPR-pooled screens with single-cell RNA-seq. Cell 167:71883–96.e15
    [Google Scholar]
80. 80. 

    Chappell L, Russell AJC, Voet T 2018. Single-cell (multi)omics technologies. Annu. Rev. Genom. Hum. Genet. 19:15–41
    [Google Scholar]
81. 81. 

    Macosko EZ, Basu A, Satija R, Nemesh J, Shekhar K et al. 2015. Highly parallel genome-wide expression profiling of individual cells using nanoliter droplets. Cell 161:51202–14
    [Google Scholar]
82. 82. 

    Stuart T, Butler A, Hoffman P, Hafemeister C, Papalexi E et al. 2019. Comprehensive integration of single-cell data. Cell 177:71888–902.e21
    [Google Scholar]
83. 83. 

    Papalexi E, Satija R. 2018. Single-cell RNA sequencing to explore immune cell heterogeneity. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 18:135–45
    [Google Scholar]
84. 84. 

    Tirosh I, Izar B, Prakadan SM, Wadsworth MH, Treacy D et al. 2016. Dissecting the multicellular ecosystem of metastatic melanoma by single-cell RNA-seq. Science 352:6282189–96
    [Google Scholar]
85. 85. 

    Trapnell C, Cacchiarelli D, Grimsby J, Pokharel P, Li S et al. 2014. The dynamics and regulators of cell fate decisions are revealed by pseudotemporal ordering of single cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 32:4381–86
    [Google Scholar]
86. 86. 

    Street K, Risso D, Fletcher RB, Das D, Ngai J et al. 2018. Slingshot: cell lineage and pseudotime inference for single-cell transcriptomics. BMC Genom 19:477
    [Google Scholar]
87. 87. 

    Saelens W, Cannoodt R, Todorov H, Saeys Y 2019. A comparison of single-cell trajectory inference methods. Nat. Biotechnol. 37:5547–54
    [Google Scholar]
88. 88. 

    Schlitzer A, Sivakamasundari V, Chen J, Sumatoh HRB, Schreuder J et al. 2015. Identification of cDC1- and cDC2-committed DC progenitors reveals early lineage priming at the common DC progenitor stage in the bone marrow. Nat. Immunol. 16:7718–28
    [Google Scholar]
89. 89. 

    Drissen R, Buza-Vidas N, Woll P, Thongjuea S, Gambardella A et al. 2016. Distinct myeloid progenitor-differentiation pathways identified through single-cell RNA sequencing. Nat. Immunol. 17:6666–76
    [Google Scholar]
90. 90. 

    Psaila B, Mead AJ. 2019. Single-cell approaches reveal novel cellular pathways for megakaryocyte and erythroid differentiation. Blood 133:131427–35
    [Google Scholar]
91. 91. 

    Ntranos V, Yi L, Melsted P, Pachter L 2019. A discriminative learning approach to differential expression analysis for single-cell RNA-seq. Nat. Methods 16:2163–66
    [Google Scholar]
92. 92. 

    Ner-Gaon H, Melchior A, Golan N, Ben-Haim Y, Shay T 2017. JingleBells: a repository of immune-related single-cell RNA-sequencing datasets. J. Immunol. 198:93375–79
    [Google Scholar]
93. 93. 

    Franzén O, Gan L-M, Björkegren JLM 2019. PanglaoDB: a web server for exploration of mouse and human single-cell RNA sequencing data. Database 2019 baz046
    [Google Scholar]
94. 94. 

    Cook CE, Lopez R, Stroe O, Cochrane G, Brooksbank C et al. 2019. The European Bioinformatics Institute in 2018: tools, infrastructure and training. Nucleic Acids Res 47:D1D15–22
    [Google Scholar]
95. 95. 

    McKinnon KM. 2018. Flow cytometry: an overview. Curr. Protoc. Immunol. 120:1 5.1.1–5.1.11
    [Google Scholar]
96. 96. 

    Kimball AK, Oko LM, Bullock BL, Nemenoff RA, van Dyk LF, Clambey ET 2018. A beginner's guide to analyzing and visualizing mass cytometry data. J. Immunol. 200:13–22
    [Google Scholar]
97. 97. 

    Setty M, Tadmor MD, Reich-Zeliger S, Angel O, Salame TM et al. 2016. Wishbone identifies bifurcating developmental trajectories from single-cell data. Nat. Biotechnol. 34:6637–45
    [Google Scholar]
98. 98. 

    Aghaeepour N, Ganio EA, Mcilwain D, Tsai AS, Tingle M et al. 2017. An immune clock of human pregnancy. Sci. Immunol. 2:15eaan2946
    [Google Scholar]
99. 99. 

    Horowitz A, Strauss-Albee DM, Leipold M, Kubo J, Nemat-Gorgani N et al. 2013. Genetic and environmental determinants of human NK cell diversity revealed by mass cytometry. Sci. Transl. Med. 5:208208ra145
    [Google Scholar]
100. 100. 

     Spidlen J, Breuer K, Rosenberg C, Kotecha N, Brinkman RR 2012. FlowRepository: a resource of annotated flow cytometry datasets associated with peer-reviewed publications. Cytometry A 81:9727–31
     [Google Scholar]
101. 101. 

     Hu Z, Jujjavarapu C, Hughey JJ, Andorf S, Lee H-C et al. 2018. MetaCyto: a tool for automated meta-analysis of mass and flow cytometry data. Cell Rep 24:51377–88
     [Google Scholar]
102. 102. 

     Ritchie MD, Holzinger ER, Li R, Pendergrass SA, Kim D 2015. Methods of integrating data to uncover genotype-phenotype interactions. Nat. Rev. Genet. 16:285–97
     [Google Scholar]
103. 103. 

     Verma SS, Ritchie MD. 2018. Another round of “clue” to uncover the mystery of complex traits. Genes 9:261
     [Google Scholar]
104. 104. 

     López de Maturana E, Alonso L, Alarcón P, Martín-Antoniano IA, Pineda S et al. 2019. Challenges in the integration of omics and non-omics data. Genes 10:3238
     [Google Scholar]
105. 105. 

     Orrù V, Steri M, Sole G, Sidore C, Virdis F et al. 2013. Genetic variants regulating immune cell levels in health and disease. Cell 155:1242–56
     [Google Scholar]
106. 106. 

     Schmiedel BJ, Singh D, Madrigal A, Valdovino-Gonzalez AG, White BM et al. 2018. Impact of genetic polymorphisms on human immune cell gene expression. Cell 175:61701–15.e16
     [Google Scholar]
107. 107. 

     Pineda S, Real FX, Kogevinas M, Carrato A, Chanock SJ et al. 2015. Integration analysis of three omics data using penalized regression methods: an application to bladder cancer. PLOS Genet 11:12e1005689
     [Google Scholar]
108. 108. 

     Poirion O, Zhu X, Ching T, Garmire LX 2018. Using single nucleotide variations in single-cell RNA-seq to identify subpopulations and genotype-phenotype linkage. Nat. Commun. 9:14892
     [Google Scholar]
109. 109. 

     Natanzon Y, Earp M, Cunningham JM, Kalli KR, Wang C et al. 2018. Genomic analysis using regularized regression in high-grade serous ovarian cancer. Cancer Inform 17: https://doi.org/10.1177/1176935118755341
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
110. 110. 

     Gloor GB, Macklaim JM, Pawlowsky-Glahn V, Egozcue JJ 2017. Microbiome datasets are compositional: and this is not optional. Front. Microbiol. 8:2224
     [Google Scholar]
111. 111. 

     Chen G, Ning B, Shi T 2019. Single-cell RNA-seq technologies and related computational data analysis. Front. Genet. 10:317
     [Google Scholar]
112. 112. 

     Lanata CM, Paranjpe I, Nititham J, Taylor KE, Gianfrancesco M et al. 2019. A phenotypic and genomics approach in a multi-ethnic cohort to subtype systemic lupus erythematosus. Nat. Commun. 10:3902
     [Google Scholar]
113. 113. 

     Chen L, Ge B, Casale FP, Vasquez L, Kwan T et al. 2016. Genetic drivers of epigenetic and transcriptional variation in human immune cells. Cell 167:51398–414.e24
     [Google Scholar]
114. 114. 

     Alpert A, Pickman Y, Leipold M, Rosenberg-Hasson Y, Ji X et al. 2019. A clinically meaningful metric of immune age derived from high-dimensional longitudinal monitoring. Nat. Med. 25:3487–95
     [Google Scholar]
115. 115. 

     Ichinohe T, Miyama T, Kawase T, Honjo Y, Kitaura K et al. 2018. Next-generation immune repertoire sequencing as a clue to elucidate the landscape of immune modulation by host-gut microbiome interactions. Front. Immunol. 9:668
     [Google Scholar]
116. 116. 

     Tang Z, Li C, Kang B, Gao G, Li C, Zhang Z 2017. GEPIA: a web server for cancer and normal gene expression profiling and interactive analyses. Nucleic Acids Res 45:W1W98–102
     [Google Scholar]
117. 117. 

     Pineda S, Sigdel TK, Chen J, Jackson AM, Sirota M, Sarwal MM 2018. Novel non-histocompatibility antigen mismatched variants improve the ability to predict antibody-mediated rejection risk in kidney transplant. Front. Immunol. 8:1687
     [Google Scholar]
118. 118. 

     McGrail DJ, Federico L, Li Y, Dai H, Lu Y et al. 2018. Multi-omics analysis reveals neoantigen-independent immune cell infiltration in copy-number driven cancers. Nat. Commun. 9:1317
     [Google Scholar]
119. 119. 

     Pineda S, Sirota M. 2018. Determining significance in the new era for P values. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 67:5547–48
     [Google Scholar]
120. 120. 

     Singh N, Garg N, Pant J 2014. A comprehensive study of challenges and approaches for clustering high dimensional data. Int. J. Comput. Appl. 92:47–10
     [Google Scholar]
121. 121. 

     Seif G. 2019. The 5 clustering algorithms data scientists need to know. Towards Data Science Febr. 5. https://towardsdatascience.com/the-5-clustering-algorithms-data-scientists-need-to-know-a36d136ef68
     [Google Scholar]
122. 122. 

     Rappoport N, Shamir R. 2019. NEMO: cancer subtyping by integration of partial multi-omic data. Bioinformatics 35:183348–56
     [Google Scholar]
123. 123. 

     Sass S, Buettner F, Mueller NS, Theis FJ 2013. A modular framework for gene set analysis integrating multilevel omics data. Nucleic Acids Res 41:219622–33
     [Google Scholar]
124. 124. 

     Cunningham JP, Ghahramani Z. 2015. Linear dimensionality reduction: survey, insights, and generalizations. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 16:892859–900
     [Google Scholar]
125. 125. 

     Zhou W, Altman RB. 2018. Data-driven human transcriptomic modules determined by independent component analysis. BMC Bioinform 19:327
     [Google Scholar]
126. 126. 

     Ghaemi MS, DiGiulio DB, Contrepois K, Callahan B, Ngo TTM et al. 2019. Multiomics modeling of the immunome, transcriptome, microbiome, proteome and metabolome adaptations during human pregnancy. Bioinformatics 35:95–103
     [Google Scholar]
127. 127. 

     Webb S. 2018. Deep learning for biology. Nature 554:555–57
     [Google Scholar]
128. 128. 

     Chen B, Khodadoust MS, Olsson N, Wagar LE, Fast E et al. 2019. Predicting HLA class II antigen presentation through integrated deep learning. Nat. Biotechnol. 37:1332–43
     [Google Scholar]
129. 129. 

     Chen R, Yang L, Goodison S, Sun Y 2019. Deep learning approach to identifying cancer subtypes using high-dimensional genomic data. Bioinformatics 2019 btz769
     [Google Scholar]
130. 130. 

     Martín-Fernández J-A, Hron K, Templ M, Filzmoser P, Palarea-Albaladejo J 2015. Bayesian-multiplicative treatment of count zeros in compositional data sets. Stat. Model. 15:2134–58
     [Google Scholar]
131. 131. 

     Hashem IAT, Yaqoob I, Anuar NB, Mokhtar S, Gani A, Ullah Khan S 2015. The rise of “big data” on cloud computing: review and open research issues. Inform. Syst. 47:98–115
     [Google Scholar]
132. 132. 

     Bakker OB, Aguirre-Gamboa R, Sanna S, Oosting M, Smeekens SPet al. 2018. Integration of multi-omics data and deep phenotyping enables prediction of cytokine responses. Nat. Immunol 19:776–86
     [Google Scholar]