Biomolecular Data Resources: Bioinformatics Infrastructure for Biomedical Data Science

Literature Cited

1. 1. 

   Molloy JC. 2011. The Open Knowledge Foundation: Open data means better science. PLOS Biol 9:e1001195
   [Google Scholar]
2. 2. 

   Helmy M, Crits-Christoph A, Bader GD 2016. Ten simple rules for developing public biological databases. PLOS Comput. Biol. 12:e1005128
   [Google Scholar]
3. 3. 

   Cook CE, Bergman MT, Cochrane G, Apweiler R, Birney E 2018. The European Bioinformatics Institute in 2017: data coordination and integration. Nucleic Acids Res 46:D21–29
   [Google Scholar]
4. 4. 

   NCBI (Natl. Cent. Biotechnol. Inf.) Resour. Coord 2016. Database resources of the National Center for Biotechnology Information. Nucleic Acids Res 44:D1D7–19
   [Google Scholar]
5. 5. 

   Sousa SA, Leitão JH, Martins RC, Sanches JM, Suri JS, Giorgetti A 2016. Bioinformatics applications in life sciences and technologies. BioMed Res. Int. 2016:3603827
   [Google Scholar]
6. 6. 

   Wooller SK, Benstead-Hume G, Chen X, Ali Y, Pearl FMG 2017. Bioinformatics in translational drug discovery. Biosci. Rep. 37:BSR20160180
   [Google Scholar]
7. 7. 

   Dayoff MO. 1965. Atlas of Protein Sequence and Structure Silver Spring, MD: Natl. Biomed. Res. Found.
8. 8. 

   McKusick VA 1966–1998. Mendelian Inheritance in Man Baltimore: John Hopkins Univ. Press
9. 9. 

   Amberger JS, Bocchini CA, Schiettecatte F, Scott AF, Hamosh A 2015. OMIM.org: Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM^®), an online catalog of human genes and genetic disorders. Nucleic Acids Res 43:D789–98
   [Google Scholar]
10. 10. 

    Burley SK, Berman HM, Kleywegt GJ, Markley JL, Nakamura H, Velankar S 2017. Protein Data Bank (PDB): the single global macromolecular structure archive. Protein Crystallography: Methods and Protocols A Wlodawer, Z Dauter, M Jaskolski627–41 New York: Springer
    [Google Scholar]
11. 11. 

    Harrison PW, Alako B, Amid C, Cerdeño-Tárraga A, Cleland I et al. 2018. The European Nucleotide Archive in 2018. Nucleic Acids Res 47:D1D84–88
    [Google Scholar]
12. 12. 

    UniProt Consort 2017. UniProt: the universal protein knowledgebase. Nucleic Acids Res 45:D158–69
    [Google Scholar]
13. 13. 

    Imker HJ. 2018. 25 years of molecular biology databases: a study of proliferation, impact, and maintenance. Front. Res. Metr. Anal. 3: https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2018.00018
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
14. 14. 

    Vines TH, Andrew RL, Bock DG, Franklin MT, Gilbert KJ et al. 2013. Mandated data archiving greatly improves access to research data. FASEB J 27:1304–8
    [Google Scholar]
15. 15. 

    Cochrane G, Karsch-Mizrachi I, Nakamura Y 2011. The International Nucleotide Sequence Database Collaboration. Nucleic Acids Res 39:D15–18
    [Google Scholar]
16. 16. 

    Nakamura Y, Cochrane G, Karsch-Mizrachi I 2013. The International Nucleotide Sequence Database Collaboration. Nucleic Acids Res 41:D21–24
    [Google Scholar]
17. 17. 

    Berman HM, Burley SK, Kleywegt GJ, Markley JL, Nakamura H, Velankar S 2016. The archiving and dissemination of biological structure data. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 40:17–22
    [Google Scholar]
18. 18. 

    Lawson CL, Patwardhan A, Baker ML, Hryc C, Garcia ES et al. 2016. EMDataBank unified data resource for 3DEM. Nucleic Acids Res 44:D396–403
    [Google Scholar]
19. 19. 

    Berman H, Henrick K, Nakamura H, Markley JL 2007. The worldwide Protein Data Bank (wwPDB): ensuring a single, uniform archive of PDB data. Nucleic Acids Res 35:D301–3
    [Google Scholar]
20. 20. 

    Iudin A, Korir PK, Salavert-Torres J, Kleywegt GJ, Patwardhan A 2016. EMPIAR: a public archive for raw electron microscopy image data. Nat. Methods 13:387–88
    [Google Scholar]
21. 21. 

    Patwardhan A. 2017. Trends in the Electron Microscopy Data Bank (EMDB). Acta Crystallogr. D 73:503–8
    [Google Scholar]
22. 22. 

    Shabani M, Knoppers BM, Borry P 2016. Genomic databases, access review, and data access committees. Medical and Health Genomics D Kumar, S Antonarakis29–35 San Diego, CA: Academic
    [Google Scholar]
23. 23. 

    Lappalainen I, Almeida-King J, Kumanduri V, Senf A, Spalding JD et al. 2015. The European Genome-phenome Archive of human data consented for biomedical research. Nat. Genet. 47:692–95
    [Google Scholar]
24. 24. 

    Tryka KA, Hao L, Sturcke A, Jin Y, Wang ZY et al. 2014. NCBI's Database of Genotypes and Phenotypes: dbGaP. Nucleic Acids Res 42:D975–79
    [Google Scholar]
25. 25. 

    Lonsdale J, Thomas J, Salvatore M, Phillips R, Lo E et al. 2013. The Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) project. Nat. Genet. 45:580–85
    [Google Scholar]
26. 26. 

    UK10K Consort 2015. The UK10K project identifies rare variants in health and disease. Nature 526:82–90
    [Google Scholar]
27. 27. 

    Keegan KP, Glass EM, Meyer F 2016. MG-RAST, a metagenomics service for analysis of microbial community structure and function. Methods Mol. Biol. 1399:207–33
    [Google Scholar]
28. 28. 

    Mitchell AL, Scheremetjew M, Denise H, Potter S, Tarkowska A et al. 2018. EBI metagenomics in 2017: enriching the analysis of microbial communities, from sequence reads to assemblies. Nucleic Acids Res 46:D726–35
    [Google Scholar]
29. 29. 

    Deutsch EW, Csordas A, Sun Z, Jarnuczak A, Perez-Riverol Y et al. 2017. The ProteomeXchange consortium in 2017: supporting the cultural change in proteomics public data deposition. Nucleic Acids Res 45:D1100–6
    [Google Scholar]
30. 30. 

    Orchard S, Kerrien S, Abbani S, Aranda B, Bhate J et al. 2012. Protein interaction data curation: the International Molecular Exchange (IMEx) consortium. Nat. Methods 9:345–50
    [Google Scholar]
31. 31. 

    Haug K, Salek RM, Conesa P, Hastings J, de Matos P et al. 2013. MetaboLights—an open-access general-purpose repository for metabolomics studies and associated meta-data. Nucleic Acids Res 41:D781–86
    [Google Scholar]
32. 32. 

    Zerbino DR, Achuthan P, Akanni W, Amode MR, Barrell D et al. 2018. Ensembl 2018. Nucleic Acids Res 46:D754–61
    [Google Scholar]
33. 33. 

    Papatheodorou I, Fonseca NA, Keays M, Tang YA, Barrera E et al. 2018. Expression Atlas: gene and protein expression across multiple studies and organisms. Nucleic Acids Res 46:D246–51
    [Google Scholar]
34. 34. 

    Fabregat A, Jupe S, Matthews L, Sidiropoulos K, Gillespie M et al. 2018. The Reactome Pathway Knowledgebase. Nucleic Acids Res 46:D649–55
    [Google Scholar]
35. 35. 

    Gramates LS, Marygold SJ, dos Santos G, Urbano J-M, Antonazzo G et al. 2017. FlyBase at 25: looking to the future. Nucleic Acids Res 45:D663–71
    [Google Scholar]
36. 36. 

    Lee RYN, Howe KL, Harris TW, Arnaboldi V, Cain S et al. 2018. WormBase 2017: molting into a new stage. Nucleic Acids Res 46:D869–74
    [Google Scholar]
37. 37. 

    Aurrecoechea C, Brestelli J, Brunk BP, Dommer J, Fischer S et al. 2009. PlasmoDB: a functional genomic database for malaria parasites. Nucleic Acids Res 37:D539–43
    [Google Scholar]
38. 38. 

    RNAcentral Consort 2017. RNAcentral: a comprehensive database of non-coding RNA sequences. Nucleic Acids Res 45:D128–34
    [Google Scholar]
39. 39. 

    Malone J, Holloway E, Adamusiak T, Kapushesky M, Zheng J et al. 2010. Modeling sample variables with an Experimental Factor Ontology. Bioinformatics 26:1112–18
    [Google Scholar]
40. 40. 

    Eur. PMC Consort 2015. Europe PMC: a full-text literature database for the life sciences and platform for innovation. Nucleic Acids Res 43:D1042–48
    [Google Scholar]
41. 41. 

    Natl. Res. Counc. Comm. Responsib. Authorship Biol. Sci 2003. Sharing Publication-Related Data and Materials: Responsibilities of Authorship in the Life Sciences Washington, DC: Natl. Acad. Press
42. 42. 

    Boulton G, Rawlins M, Vallance P, Walport M 2011. Science as a public enterprise: the case for open data. Lancet 377:1633–35
    [Google Scholar]
43. 43. 

    Wilkinson MD, Dumontier M, Aalbersberg IJ, Appleton G, Axton M et al. 2016. The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Sci. Data 3:160018
    [Google Scholar]
44. 44. 

    Ball C, Brazma A, Causton H, Chervitz S, Edgar R et al. 2004. Standards for microarray data: an open letter. Environ. Health Perspect. 112:A666–67
    [Google Scholar]
45. 45. 

    Moftah RA, Maatuk AM, White R 2016. Methods to access structured and semi-structured data in bioinformatics databases: a perspective. Proceedings of the 2016 International Conference on Engineering & MIS (ICEMIS) New York: IEEE
    [Google Scholar]
46. 46. 

    Cook CE, Bergman MT, Finn RD, Cochrane G et al. 2016. The European Bioinformatics Institute in 2016: data growth and integration. Nucleic Acids Res 44:D20–26
    [Google Scholar]
47. 47. 

    Hsi-Yang Fritz M, Leinonen R, Cochrane G, Birney E 2011. Efficient storage of high throughput DNA sequencing data using reference-based compression. Genome Res 21:734–40
    [Google Scholar]
48. 48. 

    Glob. Alliance Genomics Health 2016. A federated ecosystem for sharing genomic, clinical data. Science 352:1278–80
    [Google Scholar]
49. 49. 

    Malone J, Stevens R, Jupp S, Hancocks T, Parkinson H, Brooksbank C 2016. Ten simple rules for selecting a bio-ontology. PLOS Comput. Biol. 12:e1004743
    [Google Scholar]
50. 50. 

    Odell SG, Lazo GR, Woodhouse MR, Hane DL, Sen TZ 2017. The art of curation at a biological database: principles and application. Curr. Plant Biol. 11–12:2–11
    [Google Scholar]
51. 51. 

    Venkatesan A, Kim JH, Talo F, Ide-Smith M, Gobeill J et al. 2017. SciLite: a platform for displaying text-mined annotations as a means to link research articles with biological data. Wellcome Open Res 1:25 https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.10210.2
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
52. 52. 

    Orchard S, Ammari M, Aranda B, Breuza L, Briganti L et al. 2014. The MIntAct project–IntAct as a common curation platform for 11 molecular interaction databases. Nucleic Acids Res 42:D358–63
    [Google Scholar]
53. 53. 

    Poux S, Arighi CN, Magrane M, Bateman A, Wei C-H et al. 2017. On expert curation and scalability: UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot as a case study. Bioinformatics 33:3454–60
    [Google Scholar]
54. 54. 

    Williams E, Moore J, Li SW, Rustici G, Tarkowska A et al. 2017. The Image Data Resource: a bioimage data integration and publication platform. Nat. Methods 14:775–81
    [Google Scholar]
55. 55. 

    Chojnacki S, Cowley A, Lee J, Foix A, Lopez R 2017. Programmatic access to bioinformatics tools from EMBL-EBI update: 2017. Nucleic Acids Res 45:W550–53
    [Google Scholar]
56. 56. 

    Pavelin K, Cham JA, de Matos P, Brooksbank C, Cameron G, Steinbeck C 2012. Bioinformatics meets user-centred design: a perspective. PLOS Comput. Biol. 8:e1002554
    [Google Scholar]
57. 57. 

    Javahery H, Seffah A, Radhakrishnan T 2004. Beyond power: making bioinformatics tools user-centered. Commun. ACM 47:58–63
    [Google Scholar]
58. 58. 

    Bolchini D, Finkelstein A, Perrone V, Nagl S 2009. Better bioinformatics through usability analysis. Bioinformatics 25:406–12
    [Google Scholar]
59. 59. 

    Koscielny G, An P, Carvalho-Silva D, Cham JA, Fumis L et al. 2017. Open Targets: a platform for therapeutic target identification and validation. Nucleic Acids Res 45:D985–94
    [Google Scholar]
60. 60. 

    Karamanis N, Pignatelli M, Carvalho-Silva D, Rowland F, Cham JA, Dunham I 2018. Designing an intuitive web application for drug discovery scientists. Drug Discov. Today 23:1169–74
    [Google Scholar]
61. 61. 

    Côté RG, Jones P, Martens L, Apweiler R, Hermjakob H 2008. The Ontology Lookup Service: more data and better tools for controlled vocabulary queries. Nucleic Acids Res 36:W372–76
    [Google Scholar]
62. 62. 

    Regev A, Teichmann SA, Lander ES, Amit I, Benoist C et al. 2017. The Human Cell Atlas. eLife 6:e27041
    [Google Scholar]
63. 63. 

    Ellenberg J, Swedlow JR, Barlow M, Cook CE, Sarkans U et al. 2018. A call for public archives for biological image data. Nat. Methods 15:849–54
    [Google Scholar]
64. 64. 

    Marx V. 2013. The big challenges of big data. Nature 498:255–60
    [Google Scholar]
65. 65. 

    Durinx C, McEntyre J, Appel R, Apweiler R, Barlow M et al. 2017. Identifying ELIXIR Core Data Resources. F1000Research 5:2422
    [Google Scholar]
66. 66. 

    Stark Z, Dolman D, Manolio TA, Ozenberger B, Hill SL et al. 2019. Integrating genomics into healthcare: a global responsibility. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 104:113–20
    [Google Scholar]
67. 67. 

    Birney E, Vamathevan J, Goodhand P 2017. Genomics in healthcare: GA4GH looks to. 2022 bioRxiv 203554. https://doi.org/10.1101/203554
    [Crossref]
68. 68. 

    Burton PR, Hansell AL, Fortier I, Manolio TA, Khoury MJ et al. 2009. Size matters: Just how big is BIG? Quantifying realistic sample size requirements for human genome epidemiology. Int. J. Epidemiol. 38:263–73
    [Google Scholar]
69. 69. 

    Philippakis AA, Azzariti DR, Beltran S, Brookes AJ, Brownstein CA et al. 2015. The Matchmaker Exchange: a platform for rare disease gene discovery. Hum. Mutat. 36:915–21
    [Google Scholar]
70. 70. 

    Holub P, Swertz M, Reihs R, van Enckevort D, Müller H, Litton J-E 2016. BBMRI-ERIC Directory: 515 biobanks with over 60 million biological samples. Biopreserv. Biobank. 14:559–62
    [Google Scholar]
71. 71. 

    Sudlow C, Gallacher J, Allen N, Beral V, Burton P et al. 2015. UK Biobank: an open access resource for identifying the causes of a wide range of complex diseases of middle and old age. PLOS Med 12:e1001779
    [Google Scholar]
72. 72. 

    Spjuth O, Krestyaninova M, Hastings J, Shen H-Y, Heikkinen J et al. 2016. Harmonising and linking biomedical and clinical data across disparate data archives to enable integrative cross-biobank research. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 24:521–28
    [Google Scholar]
73. 73. 

    ENCODE Proj. Consort 2012. An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome. Nature 489:57–74
    [Google Scholar]
74. 74. 

    1000 Genomes Proj. Consort 2015. A global reference for human genetic variation. Nature 526:68–74
    [Google Scholar]
75. 75. 

    Stunnenberg HG, Abrignani S, Adams D, de Almeida M, Altucci L et al. The International Human Epigenome Consortium: a blueprint for scientific collaboration and discovery. Cell 167:1145–49
    [Google Scholar]
76. 76. 

    Church DM, Schneider VA, Steinberg KM, Schatz MC, Quinlan AR et al. 2015. Extending reference assembly models. Genome Biol 16:13
    [Google Scholar]
77. 77. 

    Wright CF, Middleton A, Burton H, Cunningham F, Humphries SE et al. 2013. Policy challenges of clinical genome sequencing. BMJ 347:f6845
    [Google Scholar]
78. 78. 

    McLaren W, Gil L, Hunt SE, Riat HS, Ritchie GRS et al. 2016. The Ensembl Variant Effect Predictor. Genome Biol 17:122
    [Google Scholar]
79. 79. 

    Knoppers BM, Joly Y. 2018. Introduction: the why and whither of genomic data sharing. Hum. Genet. 137:569–74
    [Google Scholar]
80. 80. 

    Dyke SOM, Linden M, Lappalainen I, De Argila JR, Carey K et al. 2018. Registered access: authorizing data access. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 26:1721–31
    [Google Scholar]
81. 81. 

    Ormondroyd E, Mackley MP, Blair E, Craft J, Knight JC et al. 2017. Insights from early experience of a Rare Disease Genomic Medicine Multidisciplinary Team: a qualitative study. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 25:680–86
    [Google Scholar]
82. 82. 

    Turnbull C, Scott RH, Thomas E, Jones L, Murugaesu N et al. 2018. The 100000 Genomes Project: bringing whole genome sequencing to the NHS. BMJ 361:k1687
    [Google Scholar]
83. 83. 

    Shameer K, Badgeley MA, Miotto R, Glicksberg BS, Morgan JW, Dudley JT 2016. Translational bioinformatics in the era of real-time biomedical, health care and wellness data streams. Brief. Bioinform. 18:105–24
    [Google Scholar]