1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Environment and Resources
  4. Volume 47, 2022
  5. Article

Annual Review of Environment and Resources

Volume 47, 2022

Transnational Corporations, Biosphere Stewardship, and Sustainable Futures

Abstract

Corporations are perceived as increasingly powerful and critically important to ensuring that irreversible climatological or ecological tipping points on Earth are not crossed. Environmental impacts of corporate activities include pollution of soils, freshwater and the ocean, depletion of ecosystems and species, unsustainable use of resources, changes to air quality, and alteration of the global climate. Negative social impacts include unacceptable working conditions, erosion of traditional practices, and increased inequalities. Multiple formal and informal mechanisms have been developed, and innovative examples of corporate biosphere stewardship have resulted in progress. However, the biosphere crisis underscores that such efforts have been insufficient and that transformative change is urgently needed. We provide suggestions for aligning corporate activities with the biosphere and argue that such corporate biosphere stewardship requires more ambitious approaches taken by corporations, combined with new and formalized public governance approaches by governments.

Keyword(s): accounting, corporations, governance, private sector, resilience, social-ecological
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-environ-120120-052845
2022-10-17
2024-04-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/energy/47/1/annurev-environ-120120-052845.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-environ-120120-052845&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. 1.
    Folke C, Jansson Å, Rockström J, Olsson P, Carpenter SR et al. 2011. Reconnecting to the Biosphere. Ambio 40:719–38
     [Google Scholar]
  2. 2.
    Dasgupta P. 2021. The economics of biodiversity: the Dasgupta review Rep., HM Treas. London:
  3. 3.
    Jacquet J, Frank D, Schlottmann C 2013. Asymmetrical contributions to the tragedy of the commons and some implications for conservation. Sustainability 5:1036–48
     [Google Scholar]
  4. 4.
    Heede R. 2014. Tracing anthropogenic carbon dioxide and methane emissions to fossil fuel and cement producers, 1854–2010. Clim. Change 122:229–41
     [Google Scholar]
  5. 5.
    Österblom H, Jouffray J-B, Folke C, Crona B, Troell M et al. 2015. Transnational corporations as ‘keystone actors’ in marine ecosystems. PLOS ONE 10:e0127533
     [Google Scholar]
  6. 6.
    Bebbington J, Österblom H, Crona BI, Jouffray J-B, Larrinaga C et al. 2019. Accounting and accountability in the Anthropocene. Account. Audit. Account. J. 33:152–77
     [Google Scholar]
  7. 7.
    Folke C, Österblom H, Jouffray J-B, Lambin EF, Adger WN et al. 2019. Transnational corporations and the challenge of biosphere stewardship. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 3:1396–403
     [Google Scholar]
  8. 8.
    Carmine G, Mayorga J, Miller NA, Park J, Halpin PN et al. 2020. Who is the high seas fishing industry?. One Earth 3:730–38
     [Google Scholar]
  9. 9.
    Lazarus O, McDermid S, Jacquet J 2021. The climate responsibilities of industrial meat and dairy producers. Clim. Change 165:30
     [Google Scholar]
  10. 10.
    Frumhoff PC, Heede R, Oreskes N. 2015. The climate responsibilities of industrial carbon producers. Clim. Change 132:157–71
     [Google Scholar]
  11. 11.
    Walker B, Barrett S, Polasky S, Galaz V, Folke C et al. 2009. Looming global-scale failures and missing institutions. Science 325:1345–46
     [Google Scholar]
  12. 12.
    Biermann F, Kim R, eds. 2020. Architectures of Earth System Governance: Institutional Complexity and Structural Transformation Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  13. 13.
    Biermann F, Pattberg P, eds. 2012. Global Environmental Governance Reconsidered Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
  14. 14.
    Galaz V, Tallberg J, Boin A, Ituarte-Lima C, Hey E et al. 2017. Global governance dimensions of globally networked risks: the state of the art in social science research. Risk Hazards Crisis Public Policy 8:4–27
     [Google Scholar]
  15. 15.
    Keys PW, Galaz V, Dyer M, Matthews N, Folke C et al. 2019. Anthropocene risk. Nat. Sustain. 2:667–73
     [Google Scholar]
  16. 16.
    Chapin FS, Carpenter SR, Kofinas GP, Folke C, Abel N et al. 2010. Ecosystem stewardship: sustainability strategies for a rapidly changing planet. Trends Ecol. Evol. 25:241–49
     [Google Scholar]
  17. 17.
    Österblom H, Jouffray J-B, Folke C, Rockström J 2017. Emergence of a global science–business initiative for ocean stewardship. PNAS 114:9038–43
     [Google Scholar]
  18. 18.
    West S, Haider LJ, Masterson V, Enqvist JP, Svedin U, Tengö M. 2018. Stewardship, care and relational values. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 35:30–38
     [Google Scholar]
  19. 19.
    Blasiak R, Dauriach A, Jouffray J-B, Folke C, Österblom H et al. 2021. Evolving perspectives of stewardship in the seafood industry. Front. Mar. Sci. 8:671837
     [Google Scholar]
  20. 20.
    IPCC (Intergov. Panel Clim. Change) 2021. Summary for policymakers. Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change V Masson-Delmotte, P Zhai, A Pirani, SL Connors, C Péan, et al. 1–31 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  21. 21.
    Díaz S, Settele J, Brondízio ES, Ngo HT, Guèze M et al., eds. 2019. Summary for Policymakers of the Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services Bonn, Ger: IPBES
  22. 22.
    Buchanan GM, Butchart SHM, Chandler G, Gregory RD 2020. Assessment of national-level progress towards elements of the Aichi Biodiversity Targets. Ecol. Indic. 116:106497
     [Google Scholar]
  23. 23.
    Steffen W, Rockström J, Richardson K, Lenton TM, Folke C et al. 2018. Trajectories of the Earth System in the Anthropocene. PNAS 115:8252–59
     [Google Scholar]
  24. 24.
    Rockström J, Gupta J, Lenton TM, Qin D, Lade SJ et al. 2021. Identifying a safe and just corridor for people and the planet. Earth's Future 9:e2020EF001866
     [Google Scholar]
  25. 25.
    Rockström J, Beringer T, Hole D, Griscom B, Mascia MB et al. 2021. Opinion: We need biosphere stewardship that protects carbon sinks and builds resilience. PNAS 118:e2115218118
     [Google Scholar]
  26. 26.
    Scherer AG, Palazzo G, Seidl D. 2014. Managing legitimacy in complex and heterogeneous environments: sustainable development in a globalized world. J. Manag. Stud. 50:259–84
     [Google Scholar]
  27. 27.
    Adomaitis N. 2021. Norway awards oil and gas exploration rights to 30 firms. Reuters Jan. 19. https://www.reuters.com/article/uk-norway-oil-idUKKBN29O0O2
    [Google Scholar]
  28. 28.
    Folke C, Polasky S, Rockström J, Galaz V, Westley F et al. 2021. Our future in the Anthropocene biosphere. Ambio 50:834–69
     [Google Scholar]
  29. 29.
    Sukhdev P. 2012. Corporation 2020—Transforming Business for Tomorrow's World London: Penguin Books Ltd.
  30. 30.
    Elkington J. 2020. Green Swans: The Coming Boom in Regenerative Capitalism New York: Fast Co. Press
  31. 31.
    Chrun E, Dolšak N, Prakash A. 2016. Corporate environmentalism: motivations and mechanisms. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 41:341–62
     [Google Scholar]
  32. 32.
    Crona B, Folke C, Galaz V. 2021. The Anthropocene reality of financial risk. One Earth 4:618–28
     [Google Scholar]
  33. 33.
    Jouffray J-B, Crona B, Wassénius E, Bebbington J, Scholtens B. 2019. Leverage points in the financial sector for seafood sustainability. Sci. Adv. 5:eaax3324
     [Google Scholar]
  34. 34.
    Jacquet J, Jamieson D. 2016. Soft but significant power in the Paris Agreement. Nat. Clim. Change 6:643–46
     [Google Scholar]
  35. 35.
    Elkington J. 1994. Towards the sustainable corporation: win-win-win business strategies for sustainable development. Calif. Manag. Rev. 36:90–100
     [Google Scholar]
  36. 36.
    Solomon S. 2019. The discovery of the Antarctic ozone hole. Nature 575:46–47
     [Google Scholar]
  37. 37.
    Raworth K. 2017. Doughnut Economics: Seven Ways to Think Like a 21st-Century Economist New York: Random House
  38. 38.
    Steffen W, Broadgate W, Deutsch L, Gaffney O, Ludwig C. 2015. The trajectory of the Anthropocene: the Great Acceleration. Anthr. Rev. 2:81–98
     [Google Scholar]
  39. 39.
    Steffen W, Richardson K, Rockström J, Cornell SE, Fetzer I et al. 2015. Planetary boundaries: guiding human development on a changing planet. Science 347:1259855
     [Google Scholar]
  40. 40.
    Vogel D. 2010. The private regulation of global corporate conduct. Bus. Soc. 49:68–87
     [Google Scholar]
  41. 41.
    Deng H, Higgs L, Chan V 2009. Redefining transnational corporations. Trans. Corp. Rev. 1:69–80
     [Google Scholar]
  42. 42.
    Geels FW. 2019. Socio-technical transitions to sustainability: a review of criticisms and elaborations of the multi-level perspective. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 39:187–201
     [Google Scholar]
  43. 43.
    Pereira LM, Karpouzoglou T, Frantzeskaki N, Olsson P. 2018. Designing transformative spaces for sustainability in social-ecological systems. Ecol. Soc. 23:32
     [Google Scholar]
  44. 44.
    Greer J, Singh K 2000. A brief history of transnational corporations Rep., Glob. Policy Forum New York:
  45. 45.
    McLean J. 2004. The transnational corporation in history: lessons for today?. Indiana Law J 79:363–77
     [Google Scholar]
  46. 46.
    Bakan J. 2005. The Corporation: The Pathological Pursuit of Profit and Power New York: Free Press
  47. 47.
    Nicula A, Nicula A. 2015. Development of transnational corporations in the world: opportunities and threats. Pap. Econ. Sci. 2:279–94
     [Google Scholar]
  48. 48.
    Kordos M, Vojtovic S. 2016. Transnational corporations in the global world economic environment. Proced. Soc. Behav. Sci. 230:150–58
     [Google Scholar]
  49. 49.
    Dauvergne P, Lister J. 2012. Big brand sustainability: governance prospects and environmental limits. Glob. Environ. Change 22:36–45
     [Google Scholar]
  50. 50.
    UN (United Nations) 2021. List of Least Developed Countries (as of 24 November 2021). United Nations Committee for Development Policy https://www.un.org/development/desa/dpad/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/publication/ldc_list.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  51. 51.
    Galaz V, Crona B, Dauriach A, Jouffray J-B, Österblom H, Fichtner J. 2018. Tax havens and global environmental degradation. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 2:1352–57
     [Google Scholar]
  52. 52.
    Dauvergne P. 2018. Will Big Business Destroy Our Planet? Cambridge, UK: Polity
  53. 53.
    Clapp J. 2018. Mega-mergers on the menu: corporate concentration and the politics of sustainability in the global food system. Glob. Environ. Politics 18:12–33
     [Google Scholar]
  54. 54.
    Humphreys M, Sachs JD, Stiglitz JE, eds. 2007. Escaping the Resource Curse New York: Columbia Univ. Press
  55. 55.
    Gallagher KP. 2009. Economic globalization and the environment. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 34:279–304
     [Google Scholar]
  56. 56.
    Ekwurzel B, Boneham J, Dalton MW, Heede R, Mera RJ et al. 2017. The rise in global atmospheric CO2, surface temperature, and sea level from emissions traced to major carbon producers. Clim. Change 144:579–90
     [Google Scholar]
  57. 57.
    Clapp J. 2021. The problem with growing corporate concentration and power in the global food system. Nat. Food 2:404–8
     [Google Scholar]
  58. 58.
    Papers show I.T.T urged U.S. to help oust Allende.; 1972. New York Times July 3, p. 3
    [Google Scholar]
  59. 59.
    Camisani-Calzolari F. 2004. National and international codes for reporting mineral resources and reserves: their relevance, future and comparison. J. S. Afr. Inst. Mining Metall. 104:297–305
     [Google Scholar]
  60. 60.
    Bridge G. 2004. Contested terrain: mining and the environment. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 29:205–59
     [Google Scholar]
  61. 61.
    Unerman J, Bebbington J, O'Dwyer B. 2018. Corporate reporting and accounting for externalities. Account. Bus. Res. 48:497–522
     [Google Scholar]
  62. 62.
    Etzion D. 2020. Corporate engagement with the natural environment. Nat. Ecol. Evol. 4:493
     [Google Scholar]
  63. 63.
    Franks DM, Davis R, Bebbington AJ, Ali SH, Kemp D, Scurrah M. 2014. Conflict translates environmental and social risk into business costs. PNAS 111:7576–81
     [Google Scholar]
  64. 64.
    Ross M. 2006. A closer look at oil, diamonds, and civil war. Annu. Rev. Political Sci. 9:265–300
     [Google Scholar]
  65. 65.
    Uhlin A. 1988. Transnational corporations as global political actors: a literature review. Coop. Confl. XXIII:231–47
     [Google Scholar]
  66. 66.
    May RM, Levin SA, Sugihara G 2008. Ecology for bankers. Nature 451:893–94
     [Google Scholar]
  67. 67.
    Graham B, Reilly WK 2011. Deep water: the Gulf oil disaster and the future of offshore drilling: report to the president BP Oil Spill Comm. Rep. London:
  68. 68.
    Muehlenbachs L, Cohen MA, Gerarden T. 2013. The impact of water depth on safety and environmental performance in offshore oil and gas production. Energy Policy 55:699–705
     [Google Scholar]
  69. 69.
    BSEE (Bureau Safety Environ. Enforc.) 2021. How many platforms are in the Gulf of Mexico?. Bureau of Safety and Environmental Enforcement https://www.bsee.gov/faqs/how-many-platforms-are-in-the-gulf-of-mexico (accessed January 25, 2022)
    [Google Scholar]
  70. 70.
    Fiedler H, Kallenborn R, Boer Jd, Sydnes LK. 2019. The Stockholm Convention: a tool for the global regulation of persistent organic pollutants. Chem. Int. 41:4–11
     [Google Scholar]
  71. 71.
    Farman JC, Gardiner BG, Shanklin JD. 1985. Large losses of total ozone in Antarctica reveal seasonal ClOx/NOx interaction. Nature 315:207–10
     [Google Scholar]
  72. 72.
    Young OR. 2018. Research strategies to assess the effectiveness of international environmental regimes. Nat. Sustain. 1:461–65
     [Google Scholar]
  73. 73.
    Österblom H, Folke C. 2015. Globalization, marine regime shifts and the Soviet Union. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B: Biol. Sci. 370:20130278
     [Google Scholar]
  74. 74.
    Peterson MJ. 1992. Whalers, cetologists, environmentalists, and the international management of whaling. Int. Organ. 46:147–86
     [Google Scholar]
  75. 75.
    Meyfroidt P, Lambin EF. 2011. Global forest transition: prospects for an end to deforestation. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 36:343–71
     [Google Scholar]
  76. 76.
    Melillo JM, Houghton RA, Kicklighter DW, McGuire AD. 1996. Tropical deforestation and the global carbon budget. Annu. Rev. Energy Environ. 21:293–310
     [Google Scholar]
  77. 77.
    Nepstad D, McGrath D, Stickler C, Alencar A, Azevedo A et al. 2014. Slowing Amazon deforestation through public policy and interventions in beef and soy supply chains. Science 344:1118–23
     [Google Scholar]
  78. 78.
    Tickler D, Meeuwig JJ, Bryant K, David F, Forrest JAH et al. 2018. Modern slavery and the race to fish. Nat. Commun. 9:4643
     [Google Scholar]
  79. 79.
    Campbell LM, Gray NJ, Fairbanks L, Silver JJ, Gruby RL et al. 2016. Global oceans governance: new and emerging issues. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 41:517–43
     [Google Scholar]
  80. 80.
    Carattini S, Levin S, Tavoni A 2019. Cooperation in the climate commons. Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy 13:227–47
     [Google Scholar]
  81. 81.
    Clayton S, Devine-Wright P, Stern PC, Whitmarsh L, Carrico A et al. 2015. Psychological research and global climate change. Nat. Clim. Change 5:640–46
     [Google Scholar]
  82. 82.
    Fisher DR. 2019. The broader importance of #FridaysForFuture. Nat. Clim. Change 9:430–31
     [Google Scholar]
  83. 83.
    Fisher DR, Nasrin S. 2021. Climate activism and its effects. WIREs Clim. Change 2021:e683
     [Google Scholar]
  84. 84.
    Hamann M, Berry K, Chaigneau T, Curry T, Heilmayr R et al. 2018. Inequality and the Biosphere. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 43:61–83
     [Google Scholar]
  85. 85.
    Leach M, Reyers B, Bai X, Brondizio ES, Cook C et al. 2018. Equity and sustainability in the Anthropocene: a social–ecological systems perspective on their intertwined futures. Glob. Sustain. 1:e13
     [Google Scholar]
  86. 86.
    Merrie A, Dunn DC, Metian M, Boustany AM, Takei Y et al. 2014. An ocean of surprises—trends in human use, unexpected dynamics and governance challenges in areas beyond national jurisdiction. Glob. Environ. Change 27:19–31
     [Google Scholar]
  87. 87.
    Berkes F, Hughes TP, Steneck RS, Wilson JA, Bellwood DR et al. 2006. Globalization, roving bandits, and marine resources. Science 311:1557–58
     [Google Scholar]
  88. 88.
    McCright AM, Dunlap RE 2010. Anti-reflexivity: the American conservative movement's success in undermining climate science and policy. Theory Culture Soc 27:100–33
     [Google Scholar]
  89. 89.
    Michaels D. 2020. The Triumph of Doubt: Dark Money and the Science of Deception Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  90. 90.
    Clapp J, Scrinis G. 2017. Big food, nutritionism, and corporate power. Globalizations 14:578–95
     [Google Scholar]
  91. 91.
    Monteiro CA, Moubarac JC, Cannon G, Ng SW, Popkin B. 2013. Ultra-processed products are becoming dominant in the global food system. Obes. Rev. 14:Suppl. 221–28
     [Google Scholar]
  92. 92.
    Bak-Coleman JB, Alfano M, Barfuss W, Bergstrom CT, Centeno MA et al. 2021. Stewardship of global collective behavior. PNAS 118:e2025764118
     [Google Scholar]
  93. 93.
    Green A, Schwartz A. 2018. Corporate long-termism, transparency, and the public interest Rep., Cent. Am. Progr. Washington, DC: https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/economy/reports/2018/10/02/458891/corporate-long-termism-transparency-public-interest/
  94. 94.
    OECD (Organ. Econ. Co-op. Dev.) 2011. OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises—2011 Edition Paris: OECD Publ.
  95. 95.
    Berliner D, Prakash A. 2015.. “ Bluewashing” the firm? Voluntary regulations, program design, and member compliance with the United Nations Global Compact. Policy Studies J 43:115–38
     [Google Scholar]
  96. 96.
    United Nations 1983. Draft United Nations Code of Conduct on Transnational Corporations [1983 version] Commission on Transnational Corporations, Report on Special Session (7-18 March and 9-21 May 1983). Official Records of the Economic and Social Council, 1983, Supplement No. 7 (E/1983/17/Rev. 1) Annex II:
  97. 97.
    Khalil H, Ruffing L. 2015. United Nations Centre on Transnational Corporations: Corporate Conduct and the Public Interest London: Routledge
  98. 98.
    Ruggie J. 2008. Protection, respect and remedy: a framework for business and human rights. Innov. Technol. Gov. Glob. 3:189–212
     [Google Scholar]
  99. 99.
    Potoski M, Prakash A. 2005. Green clubs and voluntary governance: ISO 14001 and firms’ regulatory compliance. Am. J. Political Sci. 49:235–48
     [Google Scholar]
  100. 100.
    Potoski M, Prakash A. 2013. Green clubs: collective action and voluntary environmental programs. Annu. Rev. Political Sci. 16:399–419
     [Google Scholar]
  101. 101.
    Lambin EF, Thorlakson T. 2018. Sustainability standards: interactions between private actors, civil society, and governments. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 43:369–93
     [Google Scholar]
  102. 102.
    Thorlakson T, de Zegher JF, Lambin EF. 2018. Companies’ contribution to sustainability through global supply chains. PNAS 115:2072–77
     [Google Scholar]
  103. 103.
    Jacquet J. 2015. Is Shame Necessary? New Uses for an Old Tool New York: Pantheon Books
  104. 104.
    Horne RE. 2009. Limits to labels: the role of eco-labels in the assessment of product sustainability and routes to sustainable consumption. Int. J. Consum. Stud. 33:175–82
     [Google Scholar]
  105. 105.
    Gulbrandsen LH. 2009. The emergence and effectiveness of the Marine Stewardship Council. Mar. Policy 33:654–60
     [Google Scholar]
  106. 106.
    Jacquet J, Pauly D, Ainley D, Holt S, Dayton P, Jackson J. 2010. Seafood stewardship in crisis. Nature 467:28–29
     [Google Scholar]
  107. 107.
    Angel DP, Hamilton T, Huber MT 2007. Global environmental standards for industry. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 32:295–316
     [Google Scholar]
  108. 108.
    Scholtens B, Dam L. 2007. Banking on the Equator. Are banks that adopted the Equator Principles different from non-adopters?. World Dev. 35:1307–28
     [Google Scholar]
  109. 109.
    Ponte S. 2014. ‘Roundtabling’ sustainability: lessons from the biofuel industry. Geoforum 54:261–71
     [Google Scholar]
  110. 110.
    Prakash A, Potoski M. 2007. Collective action through voluntary environmental programs: a club theory perspective. Policy Stud. J. 35:773–92
     [Google Scholar]
  111. 111.
    Shetty S, Kumar S. 2017. Are voluntary environment programs effective in improving the environmental performance: evidence from polluting Indian Industries. Environ. Econ. Policy Stud. 19:659–76
     [Google Scholar]
  112. 112.
    Borck JC, Coglianese C. 2009. Voluntary environmental programs: assessing their effectiveness. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 34:305–24
     [Google Scholar]
  113. 113.
    Darnall N, Sides S. 2008. Assessing the performance of voluntary environmental programs: Does certification matter?. Policy Stud. J. 36:95–117
     [Google Scholar]
  114. 114.
    Bi X, Khanna M. 2012. Reassessment of the impact of the EPA's voluntary 33/50 program on toxic releases. Land Econ 88:341–61
     [Google Scholar]
  115. 115.
    Innes R, Sam Abdoul G. 2008. Voluntary pollution reductions and the enforcement of environmental law: an empirical study of the 33/50 Program. J. Law Econ. 51:271–96
     [Google Scholar]
  116. 116.
    Khanna M, Damon LA. 1999. EPA's voluntary 33/50 Program: impact on toxic releases and economic performance of firms. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 37:1–25
     [Google Scholar]
  117. 117.
    McGuire W, Hoang PC, Prakash A. 2018. How voluntary environmental programs reduce pollution. Public Adm. Rev. 78:537–44
     [Google Scholar]
  118. 118.
    Brouhle K, Griffiths C, Wolverton A. 2009. Evaluating the role of EPA policy levers: an examination of a voluntary program and regulatory threat in the metal-finishing industry. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 57:166–81
     [Google Scholar]
  119. 119.
    Delmas M, Keller A. 2005. Free riding in voluntary environmental programs: the case of the U.S. EPA WasteWise program. Policy Sci. 38:91–106
     [Google Scholar]
  120. 120.
    Lyon TP, Kim E-H. 2006. Greenhouse gas reductions or greenwash? The DOE's 1605b Program Work. Pap., Frederick A. Barbara M. Erb Inst. Glob. Sustain. Enterp., Univ. Mich. Ann Arbor:
  121. 121.
    King AA, Lenox MJ. 2000. Industry self-regulation without sanctions: the chemical industry's Responsible Care Program. Acad. Manag. J. 43:698–716
     [Google Scholar]
  122. 122.
    Vidovic M, Khanna N. 2007. Can voluntary pollution prevention programs fulfill their promises? Further evidence from the EPA's 33/50 Program. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 53:180–95
     [Google Scholar]
  123. 123.
    Vidovic M, Khanna N. 2012. Is voluntary pollution abatement in the absence of a carrot or stick effective? Evidence from facility participation in the EPA's 33/50 Program. Environ. Resour. Econ. 52:369–93
     [Google Scholar]
  124. 124.
    Welch EW, Mazur A, Bretschneider S. 2000. Voluntary behavior by electric utilities: levels of adoption and contribution of the climate challenge program to the reduction of carbon dioxide. J. Policy Anal. Manag. 19:407–25
     [Google Scholar]
  125. 125.
    Rivera J, De Leon P, Koerber C. 2006. Is greener whiter yet? The Sustainable Slopes Program after five years. Policy Stud. J. 34:195–221
     [Google Scholar]
  126. 126.
    Blasiak R, Leander E, Jouffray J-B, Virdin J. 2021. Corporations and plastic pollution: trends in reporting. Sustain. Futures 3:100061
     [Google Scholar]
  127. 127.
    Paton B. 2000. Voluntary environmental initiatives and sustainable industry. Bus. Strategy Environ. 9:328–38
     [Google Scholar]
  128. 128.
    Alberini A, Segerson K 2002. Assessing voluntary programs to improve environmental quality. Environ. Resour. Econ. 22:157–84
     [Google Scholar]
  129. 129.
    Anton WRQ, Deltas G, Khanna M. 2004. Incentives for environmental self-regulation and implications for environmental performance. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 48:632–54
     [Google Scholar]
  130. 130.
    Coglianese C, Nash J, eds. 2006. Leveraging the Private Sector: Management-Based Strategies for Improving Environmental Performance Washington, DC: Res. Future Press
  131. 131.
    Mena S, Palazzo G. 2015. Input and output legitimacy of multi-stakeholder initiatives. Bus. Ethics Q. 22:527–56
     [Google Scholar]
  132. 132.
    Prakash A, Potoski M. 2007. Collective action through voluntary environmental programs: a club theory perspective. Policy Stud. J. 35:773–92
     [Google Scholar]
  133. 133.
    To CKM. 2016. Collaboration modes, preconditions, and contingencies in organizational alliance: a comparative assessment. J. Bus. Res. 69:4737–43
     [Google Scholar]
  134. 134.
    Gardner TA, Benzie M, Börner J, Dawkins E, Fick S et al. 2019. Transparency and sustainability in global commodity supply chains. World Dev 121:163–77
     [Google Scholar]
  135. 135.
    McCauley DJ, Woods P, Sullivan B, Bergman B, Jablonicky C et al. 2016. Ending hide and seek at sea. Science 351:1148–50
     [Google Scholar]
  136. 136.
    Dasgupta P, Ramanathan V. 2014. Pursuit of the common good. Science 345:1457–58
     [Google Scholar]
  137. 137.
    Scheffer M, van Bavel B, van de Leemput IA, van Nes EH. 2017. Inequality in nature and society. PNAS 114:13154–57
     [Google Scholar]
  138. 138.
    Dietz S, Gardiner D, Jahn V, Noels J. 2021. How ambitious are oil and gas companies’ climate goals?. Science 374:405–8
     [Google Scholar]
  139. 139.
    Nyström M, Jouffray JB, Norström AV, Crona B, Søgaard Jørgensen P et al. 2019. Anatomy and resilience of the global production ecosystem. Nature 575:98–108
     [Google Scholar]
  140. 140.
    Song W, Yu H 2018. Green innovation strategy and green innovation: the roles of green creativity and green organizational identity. Corp. Soc. Responsib. Environ. Manag. 25:135–50
     [Google Scholar]
  141. 141.
    Sukhdev P. 2012. The corporate climate overhaul. Nature 486:27–28
     [Google Scholar]
  142. 142.
    Timperley J. 2021. Why fossil fuel subsidies are so hard to kill. Nature 598:403–5
     [Google Scholar]
  143. 143.
    Sumaila UR, Skerritt DJ, Schuhbauer A, Villasante S, Cisneros-Montemayor AM et al. 2021. WTO must ban harmful fisheries subsidies. Science 374:544
     [Google Scholar]
  144. 144.
    Virdin J, Vegh T, Jouffray J-B, Blasiak R, Mason S et al. 2021. The Ocean 100: transnational corporations in the ocean economy. Sci. Adv. 7:eabc8041
     [Google Scholar]
  145. 145.
    Österblom H, Folke C, Rocha J, Bebbington J, Blasiak R et al 2022. Scientific mobilization of keystone actors for biosphere stewardship. Sci. Rep 12:3802
     [Google Scholar]
  146. 146.
    Carpenter SR, Folke C, Scheffer M, Westley FR. 2019. Dancing on the volcano: social exploration in times of discontent. Ecol. Soc. 24:23
     [Google Scholar]
  147. 147.
    Walker B, Carpenter SR, Folke C, Gunderson L, Peterson GD et al. 2020. Navigating the chaos of an unfolding global cycle. Ecol. Soc. 25:23
     [Google Scholar]
  148. 148.
    Bocken NMP, Short SW, Rana P, Evans S 2014. A literature and practice review to develop sustainable business model archetypes. J. Cleaner Prod. 65:42–56
     [Google Scholar]
  149. 149.
    Hiller JS. 2013. The Benefit Corporation and corporate social responsibility. J. Bus. Ethics 118:287–301
     [Google Scholar]
  150. 150.
    Certified B Corporation 2021. B Lab Global https://www.bcorporation.net/en-us/. (accessed January 25, 2022)
  151. 151.
    Gatti L, Seele P, Rademacher L. 2019. Grey zone in – greenwash out. A review of greenwashing research and implications for the voluntary-mandatory transition of CSR. Int. J. Corp. Soc. Responsib. 4:6
     [Google Scholar]
  152. 152.
    Markussen P, Svendsen GT. 2005. Industry lobbying and the political economy of GHG trade in the European Union. Energy Policy 33:245–55
     [Google Scholar]
  153. 153.
    Brueckner M 2013. Corporation as psychopath. Encyclopedia of Corporate Social Responsibility SO Idowu, N Capaldi, L Zu, AD Gupta 613–18 Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin, Heidelberg
     [Google Scholar]
  154. 154.
    Wright C, Nyberg D. 2017. An inconvenient truth: how organizations translate climate change into business as usual. Acad. Manag. J. 60:1633–61
     [Google Scholar]
  155. 155.
    Schiermeier Q. 2021. Climate science is supporting lawsuits that could help save the world. Nature 597:169–71
     [Google Scholar]
  156. 156.
    Folke C, Hahn T, Olsson P, Norberg J 2005. Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 30:441–73
     [Google Scholar]
  157. 157.
    Raudsepp-Hearne C, Peterson GD, Tengö M, Bennett EM, Holland T et al. 2010. Untangling the environmentalist's paradox: Why is human well-being increasing as ecosystem services degrade?. BioScience 60:576–89
     [Google Scholar]
  158. 158.
    Scheffer M, Carpenter SR, Lenton TM, Bascompte J, Brock W et al. 2012. Anticipating critical transitions. Science 338:344–48
     [Google Scholar]
  159. 159.
    Hirschman AO. 1970. Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-environ-120120-052845
Loading
Transnational Corporations, Biosphere Stewardship, and Sustainable Futures
Annual Review of Environment and Resources 47, 609 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-120120-052845
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-environ-120120-052845
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-environ-120120-052845
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplemental Material

Supplementary Data

  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error