Medical Aid in Dying: New Frontiers in Medicine, Law, and Culture

Literature Cited

1. Akabayashi A. 2002. Euthanasia, assisted suicide, and cessation of life support: Japan's policy, law, and an analysis of whistle blowing in two recent mercy killing cases. Soc. Sci. Med. 55:517–27
   [Google Scholar]
2. Allison A 2017. Greeting the dead: managing solitary existence in Japan. Soc. Text 35:117–35
   [Google Scholar]
3. Al Rabadi L, LeBlanc M, Bucy T, Ellis LM, Hershman DL et al. 2019. Trends in medical aid in dying in Oregon and Washington. JAMA Netw. Open 2:8e198648
   [Google Scholar]
4. Am. Assoc. Suicidol 2017.. “ Suicide” is not the same as “physician aid in dying.” Exec. Statement Novemb. 2 https://ohiooptions.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/AAS-PAD-Statement-Approved-10.30.17-ed-10-30-17.pdf
5. Am. Med. Assoc 2019. Report 2 of the Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs: physician-assisted suicide CEJA Rep. 2-A-19 Am. Med. Assoc. Chicago:
6. Anspach R. 2010. The “hostile takeover” of bioethics by religious conservatives and the counter-offensive. Social Movements and the Transformation of American Healthcare J Banaszak-Holl, S Levitsky, M Zald 144–70. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
   [Google Scholar]
7. Archibald ME, Crabtree C. 2010. Health social movements in the United States: an overview. Sociol. Compass 4:5334–43
   [Google Scholar]
8. Austin JL. 1962. How to Do Things with Words Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press. , 2nd ed..
9. Back A. 2004. Doctor-patient communication about physician-assisted suicide. See Quill & Battin 2004 102–17
10. Back A, Starks H, Hsu C, Gordon J. 2004. Clinician-patient interactions about requests for physician-assisted suicide: a patient and family view. Arch. Intern. Med. 162:111257–65
    [Google Scholar]
11. Back A, Wallace J, Starks H, Pearlman R. 1996. Physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia in Washington state: patient requests and physician responses. J. Am. Med. Assoc. 275:12919–25
    [Google Scholar]
12. Baeke G, Wils J-P, Broeckkaert B. 2011.. “ We are (not) the master of our body”: elderly Jewish women's attitudes towards euthanasia and assisted suicide. Ethn. Health 16:3259–78
    [Google Scholar]
13. Balch B. 2017. Death by lethal prescription: A right for older people—or their duty?. Generations 41:142–46
    [Google Scholar]
14. Ball H. 2012. At Liberty to Die: The Battle for Death with Dignity in America New York: NYU Press
15. Banaszak-Holl J, Levitsky S, Zald M. 2010. Social Movements and the Transformation of American Health Care Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
16. Battin MP, Pope T. 2022. Physician-assisted dying. UpToDate RM Arnold Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer https://www.uptodate.com/contents/physician-assisted-dying
    [Google Scholar]
17. Battin MP, Rhodes R, Silvers A, eds. 1998. Physician-Assisted Suicide: Expanding the Debate New York: Routledge
18. Battin MP, van der Heide A, Ganini L, van der Wal G, Onwuteaka-Philipsen B. 2007. Legal physician-assisted dying in Oregon and the Netherlands: evidence concerning the impact on patients in “vulnerable” groups. J. Med. Ethics 33:10591–97
    [Google Scholar]
19. Bauchner H, Fontanarosa PB. 2016. Death, dying, and end of life. JAMA 315:3270–71
    [Google Scholar]
20. Behuniak S. 2011. Death with “dignity. .” Politics Life Sci. 30:117–32
    [Google Scholar]
21. Birenbaum-Carmeli D, Banerjee A, Taylor S. 2006. All in the family: media presentations of family assisted suicide in Britain. Soc. Sci. Med. 63:2153–64
    [Google Scholar]
22. Bloom A. 2022. In Love: A Memoir of Love and Loss New York: Random House
23. Bolt EE, Snijdewind MC, Willems D, van der Heide A, Onwuteaka-Philipsen BD. 2015. Can physicians conceive of performing euthanasia in case of psychiatric disease, dementia or being tired of living?. J. Med. Ethics 41:8592–98
    [Google Scholar]
24. Booth A, Blake D. 2022. Assisted dying in the Aotearoa New Zealand media: a critical discourse analysis. Mortality 27:1107–23
    [Google Scholar]
25. Bravo G, Trottier L, Arcand M. 2022. Physicians’ characteristics and attitudes towards medically assisted dying for non-competent patients with dementia. Can. J. Aging 41:1135–42
    [Google Scholar]
26. Brenan M. 2018. Americans’ strong support for euthanasia persists. Gallup May 31. https://news.gallup.com/poll/235145/americans-strong-support-euthanasia-persists.aspx
    [Google Scholar]
27. Brooks L. 2019. Health care provider experiences of and perspectives on medical assistance in dying: a scoping review of qualitative studies. Can. J. Aging 38:3384–96
    [Google Scholar]
28. Broom A. 2017. The right to medicalization? Invited commentary on Karsoho et al. (2016). Soc. Sci. Med. 173:104–7
    [Google Scholar]
29. Brown P, Zavestoski S. 2004. Social movements in health: an introduction. Sociol. Health Illn. 26:6679–94
    [Google Scholar]
30. Bryant T. 2016. Aid in dying: the availability of ideal medications for use in “right to die” jurisdictions in the United States. Quinnipiac Law Rev. 34:4705–46
    [Google Scholar]
31. Buchbinder M. 2016. Scripting dissent: US abortion laws, medicine, and the politics of scripted speech. Am. Anthropol. 118:4772–83
    [Google Scholar]
32. Buchbinder M. 2017. Aid-in-dying laws and the physician's duty to inform. J. Med. Ethics 43:666–69
    [Google Scholar]
33. Buchbinder M. 2018a. Access to aid-in-dying in the United States: shifting the debate from rights to justice. Am. J. Public Health 108:6754–59
    [Google Scholar]
34. Buchbinder M. 2018b. Choreographing death: a social phenomenology of medical aid-in-dying in the United States. Med. Anthropol. Q. 32:4481–97
    [Google Scholar]
35. Buchbinder M. 2019. The power of suggestion: disclosure ideologies and medically assisted death. Med. Anthropol. Theory 6:15–29
    [Google Scholar]
36. Buchbinder M. 2021. Scripting Death: Stories of Assisted Dying in America Oakland: Univ. Calif. Press
37. Buchbinder M. 2022. Dirty work in medicine: understanding U.S. physicians’ agency in contested medical practices. Med. Anthropol. Q. 36:4534–51
    [Google Scholar]
38. Buchbinder M, Brassfield E, Mishra M. 2019. Health care providers’ experiences with implementing medical aid-in-dying in Vermont: a qualitative study. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 34:4636–41
    [Google Scholar]
39. Buchbinder M, Timmermans S. 2013. Affective economies and the politics of saving babies’ lives. Public Cult. 26:1101–26
    [Google Scholar]
40. Byrnes E, Ross A, Murphy M. 2022. A systematic review of barriers and facilitators to implementing assisted dying: a qualitative evidence synthesis of professionals’ perspectives. OMEGA In press
    [Google Scholar]
41. Cain C. 2016. Implementing aid in dying in California: experiences from other states indicates the need for strong implementation guidance Policy Brief, Cent. Health Policy Res. Univ. Los Angel., CA:
42. Cain C. 2020. Quelling moral panics? The case of physician aid in dying in California. Poetics 82:101479
    [Google Scholar]
43. Cain CL, Koenig BA, Starks H, Thomas J, Forbes L et al. 2020a. Hospital and health system policies concerning the California End of Life Option Act. J. Palliat. Med. 23:160–66
    [Google Scholar]
44. Cain CL, Koenig BA, Starks H, Thomas J, Forbes L et al. 2020b. Hospital responses to the End of Life Option Act: implementation of aid in dying in California. JAMA Intern. Med. 179:7985–87
    [Google Scholar]
45. Cain CL, McCleskey S. 2019. Expanded definitions of the “good death”? Race, ethnicity and medical aid in dying. Sociol. Health Illn. 41:61175–91
    [Google Scholar]
46. Campbell C, Black M. 2014. Dignity, death, and dilemmas: a study of Washington hospices and physician-assisted death. J. Pain Symptom Manag. 47:1137–53
    [Google Scholar]
47. Campbell C, Cox J. 2010. Hospice and physician-assisted death: collaboration, compliance, and complicity. Hastings Center Rep. 40:526–35
    [Google Scholar]
48. Campbell C, Cox J. 2012. Hospice-assisted death? A study of Oregon hospices on death with dignity. Am. J. Hosp. Palliat. Med. 29:3227–35
    [Google Scholar]
49. Carter v. Canada, ( 2015. 1 SCR 331 (Can.)
50. Casson A. 2011. The right to “bricolage”: Catholic pupils’ perception of their religious identity and the implications for Catholic schools in England. J. Beliefs Values 32:2207–18
    [Google Scholar]
51. Chapple A, Ziebland S, McPherson A, Herxheimer A. 2006. What people close to death say about euthanasia and assisted suicide: a qualitative study. J. Med. Ethics 32:12706–10
    [Google Scholar]
52. Chiarello E. 2013. How organizational context affects bioethical decision-making: pharmacists’ management of gatekeeping processes in retail and hospital settings. Soc. Sci. Med. 98:319–29
    [Google Scholar]
53. Danyliv A, O'Neill C 2015. Attitudes towards legalising physician provided euthanasia in Britain: the role of religion over time. Soc. Sci. Med. 128:52–56
    [Google Scholar]
54. de Andrade Neves MF. 2020. Protecting life, facilitating death: the bureaucratic experience of organized assisted suicide. Med. Anthropol. Theory 7:1158–66
    [Google Scholar]
55. Dekker NL. 2021. Anticipating an unwanted future: euthanasia and dementia in the Netherlands. J. R. Anthropol. Inst. 27:4815–31
    [Google Scholar]
56. Dembo J, Schuklenk U, Reggler J. 2018.. “ For their own good”: a response to popular arguments against permitting medical assistance in dying (MAID) where mental illness is the sole underlying condition. Can. J. Psychiatry 63:7451–56
    [Google Scholar]
57. Dobscha S, Heintz R, Press N, Ganzini L. 2004. Oregon physicians’ responses to requests for assisted suicide: a qualitative study. J. Palliat. Med. 7:3451–61
    [Google Scholar]
58. Dransart DAC, Lapierre S, Erlangsen A, Cannetto SS, Heisel M et al. 2021. A systematic review of older adults’ request for or attitude toward euthanasia or assisted-suicide. Aging Mental Health 25:3420–30
    [Google Scholar]
59. Duckett S. 2019. The long and winding road to assisted dying in Australia. Aust. J. Soc. Issues 54:386–400
    [Google Scholar]
60. Duckett S. 2020. Pathos, death talk and palliative care in the assisted dying debate in Victoria, Australia. Mortality 20:5151–66
    [Google Scholar]
61. Duranti A. 1997. Linguistic Anthropology Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
62. Emanuel E, Onwuteaka-Philipsen B, Urwin J, Cohen J. 2016. Attitudes and practices of euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide in the United States, Canada, and Europe. JAMA 316:179–90
    [Google Scholar]
63. Engelhart K. 2021. The Inevitable: Dispatches on the Right to Die New York: St. Martin's
64. Fed. Public Health Food Chain Saf. Environ 2021. Federale controle en evaluatiecommissie euthanasie https://overlegorganen.gezondheid.belgie.be/nl/advies-en-overlegorgaan/commissies/federale-controle-en-evaluatiecommissie-euthanasie
65. Foley K, Hendin H. 2002. The Case Against Assisted Suicide: For the Right to End-of-Life Care Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press
66. Fujioka JK, Mirza RM, McDonald PL, Kinger CA. 2018. Implementation of medical assistance in dying: a scoping review of health care providers’ perspectives. J. Pain Symptom Manag. 55:61564–76.e9
    [Google Scholar]
67. Gandsman A. 2016.. “ A recipe for elder abuse”: from sin to risk in anti-euthanasia activism. Death Stud. 40:9578–88
    [Google Scholar]
68. Gandsman A. 2018. The paradox of choice and the illusion of autonomy: the construction of ethical subjects in right to die activism. Death Stud. 42:5329–35
    [Google Scholar]
69. Gandsman A, Herington T, Przybylak-Brouillard A. 2016. Mourir comme mode de vie: etre vers la mort et phénoménologie de l'activisme du droit de mourir. Anthropol. Soc. 40:359–84
    [Google Scholar]
70. Ganzini L, Goy E, Dobscha S. 2007. Why Oregon patients request assisted death: family members’ views. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 23:154–57
    [Google Scholar]
71. Ganzini L, Goy E, Dobscha S. 2009. Oregonians’ reasons for requesting physician aid in dying. Arch. Intern. Med. 169:5489–93
    [Google Scholar]
72. Ganzini L, Nelson H, Schmidt T, Kraemer D, Delorit M, Lee M. 2000. Physicians’ experiences with the Oregon Death with Dignity Act. N. Engl. J. Med. 342:557–63
    [Google Scholar]
73. Golden M, Zoanni T. 2010. Killing us softly: the dangers of legalizing assisted suicide. Disabil. Health J. 3:116–30
    [Google Scholar]
74. Greenhouse C. 2006. Fieldwork on law. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 2:187–210
    [Google Scholar]
75. Hacking I. 2006. Making up people. Lond. Rev. Books 28:16 https://www.lrb.co.uk/the-paper/v28/n16/ian-hacking/making-up-people
    [Google Scholar]
76. Hamilton I, Miguel CJ, Clark D. 2020. Representations of palliative care, euthanasia and assisted dying within advocacy declarations. Mortality 25:2138–50
    [Google Scholar]
77. Hannig A. 2019. Author(iz)ing death: medical aid-in-dying and the morality of suicide. Cult. Anthropol. 34:153–77
    [Google Scholar]
78. Hannig A. 2022. The Day I Die: The Untold Story of Assisted Dying in America Napersville, IL: Sourcebooks
79. Hedberg K, New C. 2017. Oregon's Death With Dignity Act: 20 years of experience to inform the debate. Ann. Intern. Med. 167:8579–83
    [Google Scholar]
80. Heimer C. 2010. The unstable alliance of law and morality. Handbook of the Sociology of Morality S Hitlin, S Vaisey 179–202. New York: Springer
    [Google Scholar]
81. Hendry M, Pasterfield D, Lewis R, Carter B, Hodgson D, Wilkinson C. 2013. Why do we want the right to die? A systematic review of the international literature on the views of patients, carers and the public on assisted dying. Palliat. Med. 27:113–26
    [Google Scholar]
82. Hillyard D, Dombrink J. 2001. Dying Right: The Death with Dignity Movement London: Routledge
83. Holmes S, Wiebe E, Shaw J, Nuhn A, Just A, Kelly M. 2018. Exploring the experience of supporting a loved one through medically assisted death in Canada. Can. Fam. Phys. 64:9e388–93
    [Google Scholar]
84. Jasanoff S 2006. States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and Social Order London: Routledge
85. Jerolmack C, Khan S. 2014. Talk is cheap: ethnography and the attitudinal fallacy. Sociol. Methods Res. 43:2178–209
    [Google Scholar]
86. Judd M, Seale C. 2011. Joining a right-to-die society: motivation, beliefs and experiences. Mortality 16:3223–41
    [Google Scholar]
87. Kamahaki J, Cossman JS, Fox E. 2001. The right-to-die movement: extrapolating from the National Hemlock Society USA membership survey. OMEGA 43:17–23
    [Google Scholar]
88. Karsoho H, Fishman J, Wright D, McDonald ME. 2016. Suffering and medicalization at the end of life: the case of physician-assisted dying. Soc. Sci. Med. 170:188–96
    [Google Scholar]
89. Karsoho H, Wright DK, Macdonald ME, Fishman JR. 2017. Constructing physician-assisted dying: the politics of evidence from permissive jurisdictions in Carter v. . Canada. Mortality 22:145–59
    [Google Scholar]
90. Kaufman S. 2010. Time, clinic technologies, and the cultural work of time left in an ageing society. Sociol. Health Illn. 32:2225–37
    [Google Scholar]
91. Kim SY. 2021. Ways of debating assisted suicide and euthanasia: implications for psychiatry. Perspect. Biol. Med. 64:129–43
    [Google Scholar]
92. Kingdon JW. 1984. Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies Boston: Little, Brown
93. Knight KR, Kushel M, Chang JS, Zamora K, Ceaser R et al. 2017. Opioid pharmacovigilance: a clinical-social history of the changes in opioid prescribing for patients with co-occurring chronic non-cancer pain and substance use. Soc. Sci. Med. 186:87–95
    [Google Scholar]
94. Koksvik G, Richards N, Gerson SM, Materstvedt LJ. 2022. Medicalisation, suffering and control at the end of life: the interplay of deep continuous palliative sedation and assisted dying. Health 26:4512–31
    [Google Scholar]
95. Kragh JV. 2019. The final step: the issue of euthanasia of people with mental disabilities in Denmark. Disabil. Soc. 34:1143–61
    [Google Scholar]
96. Krauss A. 2018. Luisa's ghosts: haunted legality and collective expressions of pain. Med. Anthropol. 37:8688–702
    [Google Scholar]
97. Lalancette M, Yates S, Rouillard C-A. 2020. #Participating #contesting: studying counterpublics’ discourses on Twitter about the social acceptability of medical assistance in dying legislation in Canada. Can. Rev. Sociol. 57:4604–31
    [Google Scholar]
98. Lamers CPT, Williams RR. 2016. Older people's discourses about euthanasia and assisted suicide: a Foucauldian exploration. Gerontologist 56:61072–81
    [Google Scholar]
99. Lauffer K, Baker S. 2020. US media coverage of Brittany Maynard's choice to die: how ideology and framing converged. Atl. J. Commun. 28:3180–93
    [Google Scholar]
100. Lee LW. 2010. The Oregon paradox. J. Socio-Econ. 39:2204–8
     [Google Scholar]
101. Leppert K. 2016. From Karen Ann Quinlan to Brittany Maynard: advanced health care directives and the road to aid-in-dying legislation in Iowa. Drake Law Rev. Discourse 65:1–28
     [Google Scholar]
102. Levitsky S. 2013. Integrating law and health policy. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 9:33–50
     [Google Scholar]
103. Livne R. 2014. Economies of dying: the moralization of economic scarcity in U.S. hospice care. Am. Sociol. Rev. 79:5888–911
     [Google Scholar]
104. Mather L. 1998. Theorizing about trial courts: lawyers, policymaking, and tobacco litigation. Law Soc. Inq. 23:4897–940
     [Google Scholar]
105. McInerney F. 2000.. “ Requested death”: a new social movement. Soc. Sci. Med. 50:1137–54
     [Google Scholar]
106. Merry S. 2003. Rights talk and the experience of law: implementing women's human rights to protection from violence. Hum. Rights Q. 25:2343–81
     [Google Scholar]
107. Mishtal J. 2009. Matters of “conscience”: the politics of reproductive healthcare in Poland. Med. Anthropol. Q. 23:2161–83
     [Google Scholar]
108. Morgan L, Roberts EFS. 2012. Reproductive governance in Latin America. Med. Anthropol. 19:2241–54
     [Google Scholar]
109. Mosher C, Akins S. 2019. In the Weeds: Demonization, Legalization, and the Evolution of U.S. Marijuana Policy. Philadelphia: Temple Univ. Press
110. Mwaria C. 1996. Physician-assisted suicide: an anthropological perspective. Fordham Urban Law J. 24:4859–68
     [Google Scholar]
111. Neumann C. 2006. The Good Death: An Exploration of Dying in America Boston: Beacon
112. Nissim R, Gagliese L, Rodin G. 2009. The desire for hastened death in individuals with advanced cancer: a longitudinal qualitative study. Soc. Sci. Med. 69:165–71
     [Google Scholar]
113. Norwood F. 2009. The Maintenance of Life: Preventing Social Death through Euthanasia Talk and End-of-Life Care—Lessons from the Netherlands. Durham, NC: Carolina Acad.
     [Google Scholar]
114. Pellegrino E. 2005. Some things ought never be done: moral absolutes in clinical ethics. Theor. Med. Bioethics 26:6469–86
     [Google Scholar]
115. Periyakoil VS, Kraemer H, Neri E. 2016. Multi-ethnic attitudes toward physician-assisted death in California and Hawaii. J. Palliat. Med. 19:101060–65
     [Google Scholar]
116. Petrillo L, Dzeng E, Harrison K, Forbes L, Scribner B, Koenig B. 2017. How California prepared for implementation of physician-assisted death: a primer. Am. J. Public Health 107:6883–88
     [Google Scholar]
117. Pool R. 1995. Negotiating a Good Death: Euthanasia in the Netherlands London: Routledge
118. Potter J. 1996. Representing Reality: Discourse, Rhetoric, and Social Construction Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
119. Pronk R, Willems DL, van de Vathorst S. 2021. Do doctors differentiate between suicide and physician-assisted death? A qualitative study into the views of psychiatrists and general practitioners. Cult. Med. Psychiatry 45:268–81
     [Google Scholar]
120. Public Health Div. Cent. Stat 2021. Oregon Death with Dignity Act: 2021 data summary Rep. Or. Health Auth. https://www.oregon.gov/oha/ph/providerpartnerresources/evaluationresearch/deathwithdignityact/documents/year24.pdf
121. Quill T, Back A, Block S. 2016. Responding to patients requesting physician-assisted death: physician involvement at the very end of life. JAMA 315:3245–46
     [Google Scholar]
122. Quill TE, Battin MP, eds. 2004. Physician-Assisted Dying: The Case for Palliative Care and Patient Choice Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press
123. Rambotti S. 2017. Narratives of a dying woman: contentious meaning at the end of life. Socius 3: https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023117748111
     [Google Scholar]
124. Richards N 2015. Dying to go to court: demanding a legal remedy to end-of-life uncertainty. The Clinic and the Court: Law, Medicine, and Anthropology I Harper, T Kelly, A Khanna 214–38. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
125. Richards N. 2016. Assisted suicide as a remedy for suffering? The end-of-life preferences of British “suicide tourists. .” Med. Anthropol. 36:4348–62
     [Google Scholar]
126. Richards N, Krawczyk M. 2021. What is the cultural value of dying in an era of assisted dying?. Med. Humanit. 47:161–67
     [Google Scholar]
127. Sadruddin AFA. 2022. Death in an ordinary time: reflections from Rwanda. Med. Anthropol. Q. 36:2198–216
     [Google Scholar]
128. Seale C. 2010. How the mass media report social statistics: a case study concerning research on end-of-life decisions. Soc. Sci. Med. 71:5861–68
     [Google Scholar]
129. Seale C, Addington-Hall J. 1995. Euthanasia: the role of good care. Soc. Sci. Med. 40:5581–87
     [Google Scholar]
130. Sellars M, White BP, Yates P, Willmott L. 2022. Medical practitioners’ views and experiences of being involved in assisted dying in Victoria, Australia: a qualitative interview study among participating doctors. Soc. Sci. Med. 292:114568
     [Google Scholar]
131. Selznick P. 1968. Law: the sociology of law. International Encyclopedia of the Social Sciences, Vol. 9 DL Sills New York: Macmillan
     [Google Scholar]
132. Sharma A. 2013. State transparency after the neoliberal turn: the politics, limits, and paradoxes of India's Right to Information Law. Political Legal Anthropol. Rev. 36:2308–25
     [Google Scholar]
133. Sharp S. 2017. Traditional God images and attitudes towards voluntary euthanasia. Rev. Relig. Res. 59:529–45
     [Google Scholar]
134. Sharp S. 2019. Witnessing and experiencing miraculous healings and attitudes toward physician-assisted suicide. Rev. Relig. Res. 61:157–67
     [Google Scholar]
135. Shavelson L, Pope TM, Battin MP, Ouellette A, Kluger B. 2022. Neurologic diseases and medical aid in dying: Aid-in-dying laws create an underclass of patients based on disability. Am. J. Bioethics. In press
     [Google Scholar]
136. Shim J. 2010. Cultural health capital: a theoretical approach to understanding health care interactions and the dynamics of unequal treatment. J. Health Soc. Behav. 51:11–15
     [Google Scholar]
137. shuster sm 2021. Trans Medicine: The Emergence and Practice of Treating Gender New York: NYU Press
138. Silvius JL, Memon A, Arain M. 2019. Medical assistance in dying: Alberta approach and policy analysis. Can. J. Aging 38:3397–406
     [Google Scholar]
139. Singer E. 2022. Lawful Sins: Abortion Rights and Reproductive Governance in Mexico Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press
140. Snyder L, Sulmasy D. 2001. Physician-assisted suicide. Ann. Intern. Med. 135:3209–16
     [Google Scholar]
141. Starks H, Back A, Pearlman R, Koenig B, Hsu C et al. 2007. Family member involvement in hastened death. Death Stud 31:2105–30
     [Google Scholar]
142. Starks H, Pearlman R, Hsu C, Back A, Gordon J, Bharucha A. 2005. Why now? Timing and circumstances of hastening deaths. J. Pain Symptom Manag. 30:3215–26
     [Google Scholar]
143. Stat. Res. Dep 2021. Number of deaths in Belgium from 2008 to 2021 accessed Oct. 19, 2022. https://www.statista.com/statistics/516846/number-of-deaths-in-belgium/
144. Stavrianakis A. 2020. Leaving: A Narrative of Assisted Suicide Oakland: Univ. Calif. Press
145. Sulmasy LS, Mueller PS. 2017. Ethics and the legalization of physician-assisted suicide: an American College of Physicians position paper. Ann. Intern. Med. 167:8576–78
     [Google Scholar]
146. Timmermans S. 2005. Death brokering: constructing culturally appropriate deaths. Sociol. Health Illn. 27:7993–1013
     [Google Scholar]
147. Timmermans S. 2006. Postmortem: How Medical Examiners Explain Suspicious Deaths. Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
148. van Eijk M. 2017. Insuring care: paperwork, insurance rules, and clinical labor at a U.S. transgender clinic. Cult. Med. Psychiatry 41:590–608
     [Google Scholar]
149. van Wijngaarden E, Leget C, Goossensen A. 2015. Ready to give up on life: the lived experience of elderly people who feel life is completed and no longer worth living. Soc. Sci. Med. 138:257–64
     [Google Scholar]
150. Weitzer R. 2009. Sociology of sex work. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 35:213–34
     [Google Scholar]
151. Weyers H. 2006. Explaining the emergence of euthanasia law in the Netherlands: how the sociology of law can help the sociology of bioethics. Sociol. Health Illn. 28:6802–16
     [Google Scholar]
152. Wilmott L, White B, Ko D, Downar J, Deliens L. 2020. Restricting conversations about voluntary assisted dying: implications for clinical practice. BMJ Support. Pallat. Care 10:1105–10
     [Google Scholar]
153. Winters JP, Pickering N, Jaye C 2022. Winging it: a qualitative study of knowledge-acquisition experiences for early adopting providers of medical assistance in dying. Palliat. Care Soc. Pract. 16: https://doi.org/10.1177/26323524221103889
     [Google Scholar]
154. Wright K, Chan LS, Fishman JR, Macdonald ME. 2021.. “ Reflection and soul searching”: negotiating nursing identity at the fault lines of palliative care and medical assistance in dying. Soc. Sci. Med. 289:114386
     [Google Scholar]
155. Wright MS. 2017. End of life and autonomy: the case for relational nudges in end-of-life decision-making law and policy. Md. Law Rev. 77:1062–141
     [Google Scholar]
156. Young JE, Jaye C, Egan R, Winters J, Egan T. 2021. The discursive context of medical aid in dying: A paradox of control?. Soc. Sci. Med. 291:114501
     [Google Scholar]