1932

Abstract

This article discusses the rise of an approach to philanthropic giving known as philanthrocapitalism. I relate it to a new paradigm in management theory that has claimed that private profit making naturally aligns with improved public welfare. I show how growing belief in the inherent “compatibility” of corporate missions and public benefits has led to new laws and contributed to major shifts in how giving practices are structured and legitimated. The original point made in this article is that the philanthrocapitalist turn is more than simply an organizational change in the structure of different philanthropic institutions. Rather, the belief that profit-making and public welfare are naturally aligned also has significant, undertheorized implications for different principles in European-American legal traditions. The ascendancy of the philanthrocapitalist approach represents a subtle but profound displacement of belief in the need for democratic checks and balances on the use of public funds for private enrichment.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-120220-074323
2021-10-13
2024-04-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/lawsocsci/17/1/annurev-lawsocsci-120220-074323.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-120220-074323&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Adams V. 2016. Metrics: What Counts in Global Health Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press
  2. Akugizibwe P. 2020. Purse) strings attached: from dependency to decolonization in global health. The Republic Aug. 14. https://republic.com.ng/vol5-no1/purse-strings-attached/
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Al Dahdah M 2019. Between philanthropy and big business: the rise of mHealth in the global health market. Dev. Change In press. https://doi.org/10.1111/dech.12497
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  4. Almazán M, Vonthron N. 2014. Mobile Money for the Unbanked. Mobile Money Profitability: A Digital Ecosystem to Drive Healthy Margins London: GSMA https://www.gsma.com/mobilefordevelopment/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/2014_Mobile-money-profitability-A-digital-ecosystem-to-drive-healthy-margins.pdf
  5. Alston P 2020. The parlous state of poverty eradication Rep. Spec. Rapport., UN Hum, Rights Counc July, UN Doc. A/HRC/44/40 (advance unedited version)
  6. Amengual M, Kuruvilla S. 2020. Improving private regulation of labor in global supply chains: theory and evidence. IRL Rev 73:4809–16
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Aschoff N. 2015. The New Prophets of Capital. London/New York: Verso
  8. Baars G. 2020. The Corporation, Law and Capitalism. Chicago: Haymarket
  9. Barkan J. 2016. Charitable plutocracy: Bill Gates, Washington State, and the nuisance of democracy. Nonprofit Quarterly April 15. https://store.nonprofitquarterly.org/products/charitable-plutocracy-bill-gates-washington-state-and-the-nuisance-of-democracy-by-joanne-barkan-spring-2016
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Barman E. 2016. Caring Capitalism: The Meaning and Measurement of Social Value. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  11. Barman E. 2017. The social bases of philanthropy. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 43:271–90
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Bartley T. 2018. Transnational corporations and global governance. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 44:145–65
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Beaumont P. 2020.. “ We squandered a decade”: World losing fight against poverty, says UN academic. Guardian July 7. https://www.theguardian.com/global-development/2020/jul/07/we-squandered-a-decade-world-losing-fight-against-poverty-says-un-academic
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Bekkers R. 2010. Who gives what and when? A scenario study of intentions to give time and money. Soc. Sci. Res. 39:3369–81
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Birn AE. 2014. Philanthrocapitalism, past and present: the Rockefeller Foundation, the Gates Foundation, and the setting(s) of the international/global health agenda. Hypothesis 12:1e8
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Bishop M, Green M. 2008. Philanthrocapitalism: How the Rich Can Save the World New York: Bloomsbury
  17. Boucoyannis D. 2007. The international wanderings of a liberal idea, or why liberals can learn to stop worrying and love the balance of power. Perspect. Politics 5:4703–27
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Brest P. 2012. A decade of outcome-oriented philanthropy. italicStanford Social Innovation Review March 2. http://www.ssireview.org/articles/entry/a_decade_of_outcome_oriented_philanthropy
  19. Brim B, Wenham C. 2019. Pandemic Emergency Financing Facility: struggling to deliver on its innovative promise. BMJ 367:l5719
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Buchanan P. 2019. Giving Done Right: Effective Philanthropy and Making Every Dollar Count. New York: Public Aff.
  21. Burns H, Douglas C. 2021. Death, taxes and ivory towers: a story about Yale University and the untenable ties to its hometown of New Haven, Connecticut. The Business Journals May 6. https://www.bizjournals.com/bizjournals/news/2021/05/06/yale-new-haven-ct-taxes-death-ivory-towers.html
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores 573 U.S. 682 2014.)
  23. Callahan D. 2017. The Givers: Wealth, Power, and Philanthropy in a New Gilded Age New York: Knopf Doubleday
  24. Carter E. 2015. LLCs as philanthropic vehicles. Charitylawyer Dec. 15. http://charitylawyerblog.com/2015/12/15/llcs-as-philanthropic-vehicles/#ixzz58U7pRnHZ
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Chan E. 2012. Private benefit rules–part II: private inurement doctrine. Nonprofit Law Blog Oct. 16. https://nonprofitlaw.blogs.com/home/2012/10/private-benefit-rules-part-ii-private-inurement-doctrine.html
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Cordelli C 2016. Reparative justice and the moral limits of discretionary philanthropy. Philanthropy in Democratic Societies: History, Institutions, Values R Reich, L Bernholz, C Cordelli 244–67 Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Cordelli C. 2021. The Privatized State. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  28. Crane A, Palazzo G, Spence LJ, Matten D. 2014. Contesting the value of “creating shared value. .” Calif. Manag. Rev. 56:2130–53
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Cull B, Demirgüc-Kunt A, Morduch J. 2016. The microfinance business model: enduring subsidy and modest profit. Policy Res. Work. Pap. 7786 World Bank Washington, DC:
  30. Cullman L, Madoff R. 2016. The undermining of American charity. New York Times Review of Books July 14. https://www.nybooks.com/articles/2016/07/14/the-undermining-of-american-charity
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Depecker T, Déplaude M, Larchet N. 2018. Philanthropy as an investment: contribution to a study of reproduction and legitimation strategies of economic elites. Politix 121:19–27
    [Google Scholar]
  32. de Tocqueville A. 1966. 1835. Democracy in America New York: Perenn. Class
  33. Donovan K, Park E. 2019. Perpetual debt in the Silicon Savannah. Boston Review Sept. 20. http://bostonreview.net/class-inequality-global-justice/kevin-p-donovan-emma-park-perpetual-debt-silicon-savannah
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Dowie M. 2001. American Foundations: An Investigative History Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
  35. Duquette N. 2019. Founder's fortunes and philanthropy: a history of the US charitable-contribution deduction. Bus. Hist. Rev. 93:3553–84
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Durkheim E 2004. 1893. Extract from The Division of Labour in Society. Emile Durkheim: Sociologist of Modernity M Emirbayer, IJ Cohen Malden, MA: Blackwell
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Edwards M. 2010. Small Change: Why Business Won't Change the World New York: Demos
  38. Eikenberry A, Mirabella R 2018. Extreme philanthropy: philanthrocapitalism, effective altruism, and the discourse of neoliberalism. PS Political Sci. Politics 51:143–27
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Elkington J, Hartigan P. 2008. The Power of Unreasonable People: How Social Entrepreneurs Create Markets That Change the World. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Bus. Rev. Press
  40. Francis MM. 2019. The price of civil rights: black lives, white funding, and movement capture. Law Soc. Rev. 53:275–309
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Friedman M. 1970. A Friedman doctrine—The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times Magazine Sept. 13. https://www.nytimes.com/1970/09/13/archives/a-friedman-doctrine-the-social-responsibility-of-business-is-to.html
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Gabor D, Brooks SH. 2017. The digital revolution in financial inclusion: international development in the fintech era. New Political Econ 22:4423–36
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Garrett L. 2012. Money or die: a watershed moment for global public health. Foreign Affairs March 6. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/2012-03-06/money-or-die
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Garrett L. 2019. The World Bank has the money to fight Ebola but won't use it. Foreign Policy July 22. https://foreignpolicy.com/2019/07/22/the-world-bank-has-the-money-to-fight-ebola-but-wont-use-it
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Gates M. 2010. What nonprofits can learn from Coca-Cola. TED Talks Sept. https://www.ted.com/talks/melinda_gates_what_nonprofits_can_learn_from_coca_cola?language=en
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Ghosh J. 2013. Microfinance and the challenge of financial inclusion for development. Cambridge J. Econ. 37:61203–19
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Giridharadas A. 2018. Winners Takes All: The Elite Charade of Changing the World New York: Knopf
  48. Goss K. 2016. Policy plutocrats: how America's wealthy seek to influence governance. PS Political Sci. Politics 49:3442–48
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Gunther M. 2020. Philanthropist urges congress to force more giving from donor-advised-funds and foundations. The Chronicle of Philanthropy Oct. 1. https://www.philanthropy.com/article/philanthropist-urges-congress-to-force-more-giving-from-donor-advised-funds-and-foundations
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Hacker J, Pierson P 2010. Winner-take-all politics: public policy, political organization, and the precipitous rise of top incomes in the United States. Politics Soc 38:2152–204
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Harcourt B. 2011. The Illusion of Free Markets Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  52. Harman S. 2016. The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and legitimacy in global health governance. Glob. Gov. 22:3349–68
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Harvey C, Gordon J, Maclean M 2020. The ethics of entrepreneurial philanthropy. J. Bus. Ethics 171:33–49
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Haselby S, Stoller M. 2021. It's time to break up the Ivy League cartel. Chronicle of Higher Education May 28
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Hay S, Muller S. 2014. Questioning generosity in the golden age of philanthropy: towards critical geographies of super-philanthropy. Prog. Hum. Geogr. 38:5635–53
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Haydon S, Jung T, Russell S 2021.. “ You've been framed”: a critical review of academic discourse on philanthrocapitalism. Int. J. Manag. Rev 23:3353–75
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Hirschman A. 1997. The Passions and the Interests: Political Arguments for Capitalism before its Triumph. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  58. Horvath A, Powell W 2020. Seeing like a philanthropist: from the business of benevolence to the benevolence of business. The Nonprofit Sector: A Research Handbook WW Powell, P Bromley 81–122 Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press, 3rd ed..
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Inst. Health Metr. Eval 2010. Spending on health by developing country governments. In Financing Global Health 2020: Development Assistance and Country Spending in Economic Uncertainty. Seattle, WA: Inst. Health Metr. Eval.
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Int. Cent. Not-for-Profit Law 2000. Determining whether to make an equivalency determination or to exercise expenditure responsibly Resour., Int. Cent. Not-for-Profit Law https://www.icnl.org/resources/research/ijnl/determining-whether-to-make-an-equivalency-determination-or-to-exercise-expenditure-responsibility
  61. Katz SN. 2005. What does it mean to say that philanthropy is “effective”? The philanthropists’ new clothes. Proc. Am. Philos. Soc. 149:2123–30
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Kavate M. 2020.. “ Not going away”: California DAF reform bill dies, but the debate goes on. Inside Philanthropy Aug. 21
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Kazeem Y. 2020. Kenya is doubling down on regulating mobile loan apps to combat predatory lending. Quartz Africa July 23. https://qz.com/africa/1883999/kenya-to-regulate-digital-lending-apps-like-tala-opera/
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Keister L. 2005. Getting Rich: America's New Rich and How They Got that Way Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  65. King A, Pucker K. 2021. The dangerous allure of win-win strategies. Stanford Soc. Innov. Rev. 2021:34–39
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Kish Z, Leroy J. 2015. Bonded life: technologies of racial finance from slave insurance to philanthrocapital. Cult. Stud. 29:630–51 https://doi.org/10.1080/09502386.2015.1017137
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  67. Kohl-Arenas E. 2015. The Self-Help Myth: How Philanthropy Fails to Alleviate Poverty Oakland: Univ. Calif. Press
  68. Kuldova T. 2017. When elites and outlaws do philanthropy: on the limits of private vices for public benefit. Trends Organ. Crime 21:295–309
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Lefevre S. 2018. The rebellious heirs: philanthropy as class suicide. Politix 121:155–78
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Littler J. 2017. Against Meritocracy: Culture, Power and Myths of Mobility London: Routledge:
  71. MacAskill W. 2016. Doing Good Better: How Effective Altruism Can Help You Help Others, Do Work that Matters, and Make Smarter Choices about Giving Back New York: Avery
  72. MacLean N. 2017. Democracy in Chains: The Deep History of the Radical Right's Stealth Plan for America. London: Scribe
  73. Madoff R. 2010. Immortality and the Law: The Rising Power of the American Dead New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
  74. Mahajan M. 2019. The IHME in the shifting landscape of global health metrics. Glob. Policy 10:Suppl. 1110–20
    [Google Scholar]
  75. Mastercard 2014. New innovation lab in East Africa to expand digital financial services Press Rel., Dec. 3. https://newsroom.mastercard.com/press-releases/new-innovation-lab-east-africa-expand-digital-financial-services/
  76. Mayer J. 2016. Dark Money: The Hidden History of Billionaires Behind the Radical Right. New York: Penguin Random House
  77. Mayer J. 2020. How Trump is helping tycoons exploit the pandemic. New Yorker July 13. https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2020/07/20/how-trump-is-helping-tycoons-exploit-the-pandemic
    [Google Scholar]
  78. McGoey L. 2012. Philanthrocapitalism and its critics. Poetics 40:2185–99
    [Google Scholar]
  79. McGoey L. 2015. No Such Thing as a Free Gift: The Gates Foundation and the Price of Philanthropy London: Verso
  80. McGoey L. 2017. The elusive rentier rich: Piketty and the problem of absent evidence. Sci. Technol. Hum. Values 42:2257–79
    [Google Scholar]
  81. McGoey L. 2019. The Unknowers: How Strategic Ignorance Rules the World. London: Zed
  82. McGoey L, Thiel D, West R. 2018. Philanthrocapitalism and crimes of the powerful. Politix 121:129–54
    [Google Scholar]
  83. McKinsey 2017. Global payments report 2017: Amid rapid change, an upwards trajectory Rep., McKinsey Washington, DC:
  84. McKinsey 2019. Global payments report 2019: Amid sustained growth, accelerating challenges demand bold actions Rep., McKinsey Washington, DC:
  85. Mears A. 2020. Very Important People: Status and Beauty in the Global Party Circuit. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  86. Mediavilla J, Garcia-Arias J 2018. Philanthrocapitalism and hegemony in (financing for) development. Globalizations 16:6857–75
    [Google Scholar]
  87. Meiksins Wood E 2008. Citizens to Lords: A Social History of Western Political Thought from Antiquity to the Late Middle Ages London: Verso
  88. Mitchell G, Calabrese T. 2020. Instrumental philanthropy, nonprofit theory, and information costs. Nonprofit Policy Forum 11:2 https://doi.org/10.1515/npf-2019-0050
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  89. Mitchell K, Sparke M. 2015. The new Washington consensus: millennial philanthropy and the making of global market subjects. Antipode 48:3724–49
    [Google Scholar]
  90. Moeller K. 2018. The Gender Effect: Capitalism, Feminism, and the Corporate Politics of Development. Oakland: Univ. Calif. Press
  91. Morey M. 2014. The Rockefeller Foundation's hand in Hobby Lobby. italicStanford Social Innovation Review Aug. 21. https://ssir.org/articles/entry/the_rockefeller_foundations_hand_in_hobby_lobby
  92. Morey M. 2021. White Philanthropy: Carnegie Corporation's An American Dilemma and the Making of a White World Order Chapel Hill: UNC Press
    [Google Scholar]
  93. Natile S. 2020. The Exclusionary Politics of Digital Financial Inclusion: Mobile Money, Gendered Walls. London: Routledge
  94. Nicholls A. 2009.. “ We do good things don't we?” Blended value accounting in social entrepreneurship. Account. Organ. Soc 34:6–7755–69
    [Google Scholar]
  95. O'Connor A. 2015. Coca-Cola funds scientists who shift blame for obesity away from bad diets. New York Times Aug. 19. https://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2015/08/09/coca-cola-funds-scientists-who-shift-blame-for-obesity-away-from-bad-diets
    [Google Scholar]
  96. Odundo Owuor V 2019. Mobile based lending is a double-edged sword in Kenya—helping but also spiking personal debt. Quartz Africa Oct. 5
    [Google Scholar]
  97. Paine T. 1995. Rights of Man, Common Sense and Other Political Writings M Philp Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  98. Parmar I. 2012. Foundations of the American Century: The Ford, Carnegie, and Rockefeller Foundations and the Rise of American Power New York: Columbia Univ. Press
  99. Piketty T. 2014. Capital in the 21st Century. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  100. Pinker S. 2018. Enlightenment Now: The Case for Reason, Science, Humanism and Progress New York: Penguin
  101. Piper K. 2020. What Kenya can teach its neighbors—and the US—about improving the lives of the “unbanked. .” Vox Sept. 11. https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/21420357/kenya-mobile-banking-unbanked-cellphone-money
    [Google Scholar]
  102. Porter M, Kramer M. 1999. Philanthropy's new agenda: creating value. Harvard Business Review Nov.–Dec. https://hbr.org/1999/11/philanthropys-new-agenda-creating-value
    [Google Scholar]
  103. Porter M, Kramer M. 2002. The competitive advantage of corporate philanthropy. Harvard Business Review Dec. https://hbr.org/2002/12/the-competitive-advantage-of-corporate-philanthropy
    [Google Scholar]
  104. Porter ME, Kramer MR. 2011. Creating shared value: how to reinvent capitalism—and unleash a wave of innovation and growth. Harvard Business Review Jan.–Feb. https://hbr.org/2011/01/the-big-idea-creating-shared-value
    [Google Scholar]
  105. Ravitch D. 2010. The Death and Life of the Great American School System New York: Basic Books
  106. Reckhow S. 2017. Philanthropic data and the rise of the LLCs; or, what happens when scholars can no longer follow the money. HistPhil Jan. 26. https://histphil.org/2017/01/26/philanthropic-data-and-the-rise-of-llcs-or-what-happens-when-scholars-can-no-longer-follow-the-money/
    [Google Scholar]
  107. Reckhow S 2020. Politics, philanthropy and inequality. The Nonprofit Sector: A Research Handbook WW Powell, P Bromley 208–26 Stanford, CA: Stanford Univ. Press, 3rd ed..
    [Google Scholar]
  108. Reich R. 2018. Just Giving: Why Philanthropy Is Failing Democracy and How It Can Do Better Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  109. Richey L, Ponte S. 2011. Brand Aid: Shopping Well to Save the World. Minneapolis: Univ. Minn. Press
  110. Savage M, Williams K. 2008. Elites: remembered in capitalism and forgotten in social science. Sociol. Rev 56:Suppl. 11–24
    [Google Scholar]
  111. Sayer A 2012. Facing the challenge of the return of the rich. Class Inequality in Austerity Britain W Atkinson, S Roberts, M Savage 163–79 Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave, Macmillan
    [Google Scholar]
  112. Schwab T. 2020. Bill Gates gives to the rich (including himself). The Nation March 17. https://www.thenation.com/article/society/bill-gates-foundation-philanthropy/
    [Google Scholar]
  113. Seamster L, Charron-Chénier R. 2017. Predatory inclusion and education debt: rethinking the racial wealth gap. Soc. Curr. 4:3199–207
    [Google Scholar]
  114. Shamir R. 2010. Capitalism, governance, and authority: the case of corporate social responsibility. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 6:531–53
    [Google Scholar]
  115. Smith A. 1997. 1776. Wealth of Nations K Sutherland Oxford, UK: Oxford World Class.
  116. Soskis B. 2014. Both more and no more: the historical split between charity and philanthropy. Work. Pap., Hudson Inst Washington, DC:
  117. Soskis B. 2017. Giving numbers: reflections on why, what, and how we are counting. NonProfit Quarterly Nov. 1. https://nonprofitquarterly.org/giving-numbers-reflections-counting
    [Google Scholar]
  118. Stuckler D, Basu S, McKee M. 2011. Global health philanthropy and institutional relationships: How should conflicts of interest be addressed?. PLOS Med 8:4e1001020
    [Google Scholar]
  119. Taylor K-Y. 2019. Race for Profit: How Banks and the Real Estate Industry Undermined Black Homeownership Oakland: Univ. Calif. Press
  120. TechnoServe 2010. The Coca-Cola Company, TechnoServe, and the Gates Foundation partner to boost incomes of 50,000 small-scale farmers in East Africa. News Rel., Jan. 20. https://www.technoserve.org/news/the-coca-cola-company-technoserve-and-the-gates-foundation-partner-to-boost/
    [Google Scholar]
  121. Tompkins-Stange M. 2016a. Policy Patrons: Philanthropy, Education Reform, and the Politics of Influence Cambridge, MA: Harvard Educ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  122. Tompkins-Stange M. 2016b. Why should Bill Gates Decide how our children should be educated. Open Democracy Sept 14: https://www.opendemocracy.net/en/transformation/why-should-bill-gates-decide-how-our-children-will-be-educated/
    [Google Scholar]
  123. Toyama K. 2011. Lies, hype, and profit: the truth about microfinance. Atlantic Jan. 28. https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2011/01/lies-hype-and-profit-the-truth-about-microfinance/70405/
    [Google Scholar]
  124. Villanueva E. 2018. Decolonizing Wealth: Indigenous Wisdom to Heal Divides and Restore Balance San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publ.
  125. Vogel A. 2006. Who's making global civil society: philanthropy and US empire in world society. Br. J. Sociol. 57:4635–55
    [Google Scholar]
  126. Weingast BR. 1997. The political foundations of democracy and the rule of law. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 91:245–63
    [Google Scholar]
  127. Weingast BR. 2017. Adam Smith's constitutional theory Work. Pap., Stanford Univ Stanford, CA:
  128. Youde J. 2012. The Rockefeller and Gates Foundations in global health governance. italicGlob. Soc. 272139–58
  129. Zunz O. 2011. Philanthropy in America: A History Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-120220-074323
Loading
  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error