1932

Abstract

Along with China's economic and military rise, its leading political values will increasingly shape both China and the world at large. Hence, we need to understand, compare, and learn from leading values in China's political culture. This review discusses recent efforts to systematically compare three leading values in China's philosophical traditions—meritocracy, hierarchy, and harmony—with leading values from the political culture of Western societies.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051215-031821
2017-05-11
2024-04-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/polisci/20/1/annurev-polisci-051215-031821.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051215-031821&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Aden C, Bartels L. 2016. Democracy for Realists: Why Elections Do Not Produce Responsive Government Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  2. Angle SC. 2012. Contemporary Confucian Political Philosophy Cambridge, UK: Polity
  3. Bai T. 2013. A Confucian version of hybrid regime: How does it work and why is it superior?. See Bell & Li 2013 55–87
  4. Balch O. 2013. Buen vivir: the social philosophy inspiring movements in South America. Guardian. Feb. 4. https://www.theguardian.com/sustainable-business/blog/buen-vivir-philosophy-south-america-eduardo-gudynas
  5. Beard M. 2015. SPQR: A History of Ancient Rome New York: Liveright
  6. Bell DA. 2006. Beyond Liberal Democracy: Political Thinking for an East Asian Context Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  7. Bell DA. 2008. China's New Confucianism: Politics and Everyday Life in a Changing Society Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  8. Bell DA. 2015. The China Model: Political Meritocracy and the Limits of Democracy Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  9. Bell DA, de-Shalit A. 2013. The Spirit of Cities: Why the Identity of a City Matters in a Global Age Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  10. Bell DA, Li C. 2013. The East Asian Challenge for Democracy: Political Meritocracy in Comparative Perspective Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  11. Bell DA, Metz T. 2011. Confucianism and Ubuntu: reflections on a dialogue between Chinese and African traditions. J. Chin. Philos. 38:78–95 [Google Scholar]
  12. Bell DA, Mo Y. 2014. Harmony in the world 2013: the ideal and the reality. Soc. Indic. Res. 118:2797–818 [Google Scholar]
  13. Bell DA, Ziliotti E. 2014. Should voters be tested?. WorldPost Apr:14 [Google Scholar]
  14. Bellah RN, Madsen R, Sullivan WM, Swidler A, Tipston SM. 1985. Habits of the Heart: Individualism and Commitment in American Life Berkeley, CA: Univ. Calif. Press
  15. Berggruen N, Gardels N. 2012. Intelligent Governance for the 21st Century: A Middle Way between East and West Cambridge, UK: Polity
  16. Bevir M. 2010. Democratic Governance Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  17. Bhargava R. 2014. Beyond toleration: civility and principled co-existence in Asokan edicts. The Boundaries of Toleration A Stepan, C Taylor New York: Columbia Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  18. Brennan J. 2011. The Ethics of Voting Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  19. Burke E. 1999 (1790). Select Works of Edmund Burke 2 Reflections on the Revolution in France Indianapolis, IN: Lib. Fund
  20. Caplan B. 2007. The Myth of the Rational Voter: Why Democracies Choose Bad Policies Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  21. Chan J. 2013. Political meritocracy and meritorious rule: a Confucian perspective. See Bell & Li 2013 31–54
  22. Chan J. 2014. Confucian Perfectionism: A Political Philosophy for Modern Times Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  23. Chen AH. 2003. Mediation, litigation and justice: Confucian reflections in a modern liberal society. Confucianism for the Modern World DA Bell, C Hahm 257–87 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  24. Dallmayr F. 2010. Comparative Political Theory: An Introduction New York: Palgrave Macmillan
  25. Donaldson S, Kymlicka W. 2011. Zoopolis: A Political Theory of Animal Rights Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  26. El Amine L. 2015. Classical Confucian Political Thought: A New Interpretation Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  27. Elman B. 2013. A society in motion: unexpected consequences of political meritocracy in pre-Imperial China. See Bell & Li 2013 203–31
  28. Godrej F. 2011. Cosmopolitan Political Thought: Method, Practice, Discipline New York: Oxford Univ. Press
  29. Harari Y. 2015. Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind New York: Harper
  30. He B. 2016. A discussion of Daniel A. Bell's The China Model: Political Meritocracy and the Limits of Democracy Perspect. Polit. 14:1147–49 [Google Scholar]
  31. Helgesen G, Thomsen SR. 2006. Politics, Culture, and Self: East Asian and North European Attitudes Copenhagen: Nord. Inst. Asian Stud.
  32. Huntington S. 2011. The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order New York: Simon & Schuster
  33. Jenco L. 2007. “What does heaven ever say?” A methods-centered approach to cross-cultural engagement. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 101:4741–55 [Google Scholar]
  34. Jenco L. 2010. Making the Political: Founding and Action in the Political Theory of Zhang Shizhao New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  35. Jiang Q. 2012. A Confucian Constitutional Order: How China's Ancient Past Can Shape Its Political Future DA Bell, R Fan; Transl. E Ryden Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  36. Kennedy JA, Kim TW, Strudler A. 2016. Hierarchies and dignity: a Confucian communitarian approach. Bus. Ethics Q. 26:4479–502 [Google Scholar]
  37. Lake D. 2009. Hierarchy in International Relations Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press
  38. Leavitt HJ. 2004. Top Down: Why Hierarchies Are Here to Stay and How to Manage Them More Effectively Cambridge, MA: Harv. Bus. Sch. Press
  39. Li C. 2012. Equality and inequality in Confucianism. Dao 11:295–313 [Google Scholar]
  40. Li C. 2014. The Confucian Philosophy of Harmony Oxfordshire, UK: Routledge
  41. Li J. 2012. Cultural Foundations of Learning: East and West Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  42. Li J. 2016. Humility in learning: a Confucian perspective. J. Moral Educ. 45:147–65 [Google Scholar]
  43. Macedo S. 2013. Meritocratic democracy: learning from the American experience. See Bell & Li 2013 232–58
  44. Magee JC, Galinsky AD. 2008. Social hierarchy: the self-reinforcing nature of power and status. Acad. Manag. Ann. 2:351–98 [Google Scholar]
  45. Mann M. 2005. The Dark Side of Democracy: Explaining Ethnic Cleansing Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  46. Metz T. 2016. Confucian harmony from an African perspective. Afr. Asian Stud. 15:1–22 [Google Scholar]
  47. Metz T. 2017. Values in China as compared to Africa: two conceptions of harmony. Philos. East West 67:2 In press [Google Scholar]
  48. Meyer E. 2014. The Culture Map: Decoding How People Think, Lead, and Get Things Done Across Cultures New York: Public Aff.
  49. Mochari I. 2014. The case for hierarchy. Inc.com Jan. 15. http://www.inc.com/ilan-mochari/case-for-hierarchy.html
  50. Mulgan T. 2011. Ethics for a Broken World: Imagining Philosophy after Catastrophe Montreal, Can: McGill-Queen's Univ. Press
  51. Nisbett RE. 2003. The Geography of Thought: How Asians and Westerners Think Differently…and Why New York: Free Press
  52. Pettit P. 2013. Meritocratic representation. See Bell & Li 2013 138–60
  53. Pines Y. 2013. Between merit and pedigree: evolution of the concept of “elevating the worthy” in pre-Imperial China. See Bell & Li 2013 161–202
  54. Puett M. 2014. Ritual disjunctions: ghosts, philosophy, and anthropology. The Ground Between: Anthropologists Engage Philosophy V Das, MD Jackson, A Kleinman, B Singh 218–33 Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  55. Rachman G. 2016. Easternisation: War and Peace in the Asian Century London: Bodley Head
  56. Rawls J. 1999. A Theory of Justice Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press
  57. Shanahan M. 2015. The Technological Singularity Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
  58. Shi T. 2015. The Cultural Logic of Politics in Mainland China and Taiwan Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  59. Shin DC. 2011. Confucianism and Democratization in East Asia Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  60. Shin DC. 2013. How East Asians view meritocracy: a Confucian perspective. See Bell & Li 2013 259–87
  61. Singer P. 1973. Animal liberation. New York Rev. Books Apr. 5
  62. Singer P, Dawn K. 2016. Harambe the gorilla dies, meat-eaters grieve. Op-Ed. Los Angeles Times June 5
  63. Skorupski J. 2013. The liberal critique of democracy. See Bell & Li 2013 116–37
  64. Sun YS. 1994. Prescriptions for Saving China: Selected Writings of Sun Yan-sen J Wei, R Myers, D Gillin; Transl. J Wei, E Zen, L Chao Stanford, CA: Hoover Inst. Press
  65. Tan SH. 2004. Confucian Democracy: A Deweyan Reconstruction Albany, NY: State Univ. New York Press
  66. Taylor M. 1996. Good government: on hierarchy, social capital, and the limitations of rational choice theory. J. Polit. Philos. 4:11–28 [Google Scholar]
  67. Thaler RH, Sunstein CR. 2009. Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness New York: Penguin
  68. Tiwald J. 2012. Xunzi on moral expertise. Dao 11:3275–93 [Google Scholar]
  69. von Vacano D. 2015. The scope of comparative political theory. Annu. Rev. Polit. Sci. 18:465–80 [Google Scholar]
  70. Walzer M. 1983. Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Equality Oxford: Basil Blackwell
  71. Walzer M. 1994. Thick and Thin: Moral Argument at Home and Abroad Notre Dame, IN: Univ. Notre Dame Press
  72. Wong DB. 2011. Agon and : contest and harmony. Ethics in Early China: An Anthology C Fraser, D Robins, T O'Leary 197–216 Hong Kong: Hong Kong Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  73. Xiao H, Li C. 2013. China's meritocratic examinations and the ideal of virtuous talents. See Bell & Li 2013 340–62
  74. Yan X. 2011. Ancient Chinese Thought, Modern Chinese Power DA Bell, Z Sun, Transl. E Ryden Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  75. Yan Y. 2002. Unbalanced reciprocity: asymmetrical gift giving and social hierarchy in rural China. The Question of the Gift: Essays Across Disciplines M Osteen 67–84 London: Routledge [Google Scholar]
  76. Yao Y. 2013. The disinterested government: an interpretation of China's economic success in the reform era. Achieving Development Success: Strategies and Lessons from the Developing World AK Fosu 152–75 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  77. Yearley LH. 1990. Mencius and Aquinas: Theories of Virtue and Conceptions of Courage Albany, NY: State Univ. New York Press
  78. Zhang T. 2014. Social hierarchies and the formation of customary property law in pre-industrial China and England. Am. J. Comp. Law 62:171–210 [Google Scholar]
  79. Zheng Y. 2010. The Chinese Communist Party as Organizational Emperor: Culture, Reproduction and Transformation London: Routledge
  80. Zitek EM, Tiedens LZ. 2012. The fluency of social hierarchy: the ease with which hierarchical relationships are seen, remembered, learned, and liked. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 102:198–115 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051215-031821
Loading
  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error