1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Political Science
  4. Volume 26, 2023
  5. Article

Annual Review of Political Science

Volume 26, 2023

Context and Contact: Unifying the Study of Environmental Effects on Politics

Abstract

A growing literature explores how local environments, or contexts, affect political behavior, especially by shaping interpersonal contact with social out-groups. While many studies still draw directly on long-standing hypotheses from contact theory, this research agenda increasingly focuses on new research questions, beyond the classic social psychology literature, and new empirical cases, including from across the lower- and middle-income world. We develop a typology of forms of context and contact to aid the aggregation of findings across disparate cases and demonstrate that the mechanisms that may account for the political effects of intergroup context and contact are broader than those typically explored in psychologically oriented research. We propose future directions for research in this area, including greater focus on the intersection of ethnic and class-based contact and greater attention to how built or computer-based environments may mediate or mirror the effects of demographic contexts.

Keyword(s): built environment, contact theory, context, ethnic politics, inequality, neighborhood effects, political behavior
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051421-012551
2023-06-15
2024-05-01
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/polisci/26/1/annurev-polisci-051421-012551.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051421-012551&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Adachi PJ, Hodson G, Willoughby T, Zanette S. 2015. Brothers and sisters in arms: intergroup cooperation in a violent shooter game can reduce intergroup bias. Psychol. Violence 5:4455
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Allport G. 1954. The Nature of Prejudice Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley
  3. Alrababa'h A, Marble W, Mousa S, Siegel AA 2021. Can exposure to celebrities reduce prejudice? The effect of Mohamed Salah on Islamophobic behaviors and attitudes. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 115:41111–28
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Auerbach AM. 2020. Demanding Development: The Politics of Public Goods Provision in India's Urban Slums New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  5. Beiser-McGrath J, Muller-Crepon C, Pengl YI. 2021. Who benefits? How local ethnic demography shapes political favoritism in Africa. Br. J. Political Sci. 51:41582–1600
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Bell D, Zacka B 2020. Introduction. Political Theory and Architecture D Bell, B Zacka 1–20. London: Bloomsbury
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Bollen P. 2022. Familiar strangers: Repeated casual contact and intergroup relations in South Africa. Work. Pap . https://www.dropbox.com/s/v4m47as47mjrwvq/Bollen_JMP.pdf?dl=0
  8. Brambor T, Goenaga A, Lindvall J, Teorell J. 2020. The lay of the land: information capacity and the modern state. Comp. Political Stud. 53:2175–213
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Broockman D, Kalla J. 2016. Durably reducing transphobia: a field experiment on door-to-door canvassing. Science 352:6282220–24
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Browning CR, Calder CA, Soller B, Jackson AL, Dirlam J. 2017. Ecological networks and neighborhood social organization. Am. J. Sociol. 122:61939–88
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Carlin RE, Singer MM. 2013. Context counts: the election cycle, development, and the nature of economic voting. J. Politics 75:3730–42
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Chandra K. 2004. Why Ethnic Parties Succeed: Patronage and Head Counts in India New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  13. Choi DD, Poertner M, Sambanis N. 2019. Parochialism, social norms, and discrimination against immigrants. PNAS 116:3316274–79
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Condra LN, Linardi S. 2019. Casual contact and ethnic bias: experimental evidence from Afghanistan. J. Politics 81:31028–42
     [Google Scholar]
  15. de Kadt D, Sands M. 2021. Racial isolation drives racial voting: evidence from the new South Africa. Political Behav 43:187–117
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Dinas E, Matakos K, Xefteris D, Hangartner D. 2019. Waking up the Golden Dawn: Does exposure to the refugee crisis increase support for extreme-right parties?. Political Anal 27:2244–54
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Dinesen PT, Schaeffer M, Sønderskov KM. 2020. Ethnic diversity and social trust: a narrative and meta-analytical review. Annu. Rev. Political Sci. 23:441–65
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Ditlmann RK, Samii C. 2016. Can intergroup contact affect ingroup dynamics? Insights from a field study with Jewish and Arab-Palestinian youth in Israel. Peace Confl. J. Peace Psychol. 22:4380
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Ejdemyr S, Kramon E, Robinson AL. 2018. Segregation, ethnic favoritism, and the strategic targeting of local public goods. Comp. Political Stud. 51:91111–43
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Enos RD. 2014. Causal effect of intergroup contact on exclusionary attitudes. PNAS 111:103699–704
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Enos RD. 2016. What the demolition of public housing teaches us about the impact of racial threat on political behavior. Am. J. Political Sci. 60:1123–42
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Enos RD. 2017. The Space Between Us: Social Geography and Politics New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  23. Enos RD, Gidron N. 2018. Exclusion and cooperation in diverse societies: experimental evidence from Israel. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 118:4742–57
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Evans GW. 2003. The built environment and mental health. J. Urban Health 80:536–55
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Fearon JD, Laitin DD. 2000. Violence and the social construction of ethnic identity. Int. Organ. 54:4845–77
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Gade EK. 2020. Social isolation and repertoires of resistance. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 114:2309–25
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Gay C. 2004. Putting race in context: identifying the environmental determinants of black racial attitudes. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 98:4547–62
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Gay C. 2006. Seeing difference: the effect of economic disparity on black attitudes toward Latinos. Am. J. Political Sci. 50:4982–97
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Grannis R. 1998. The importance of trivial streets: residential streets and residential segregation. Am. J. Sociol. 103:61530–64
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Grannis R. 2009. From the Ground Up: Translating Geography into Community Through Neighbor Networks Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  31. Gu J, Mueller A, Nielsen I, Shachat J, Smyth R. 2019. Improving intergroup relations through actual and imagined contact: field experiments with Malawian shopkeepers and Chinese migrants. Econ. Dev. Cult. Change 68:1273–303
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Gubler JR, Kalmoe NR. 2015. Violent rhetoric in protracted group conflicts: experimental evidence from Israel and India. Political Res. Q. 68:4651–64
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Habyarimana J, Humphreys M, Posner DN, Weinstein JM. 2007. Why does ethnic diversity undermine public goods provision?. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 101:4709–25
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Halpern D. 1995. Mental Health and the Built Environment: More than Bricks and Mortar? London: Taylor and Francis
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Hangartner D, Dinas E, Marbach M, Matakos K, Xefteris D. 2019. Does exposure to the refugee crisis make natives more hostile?. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 113:2442–55
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Harris JA, Posner D. 2019. (Under what conditions) do politicians reward their supporters? Evidence from Kenya's constituencies development fund. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 113:1123–39
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Hassan M, Klaus K 2022. Closing the gap: the politics of property rights in Kenya. World Politics. In press
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Healy AJ, Persson M, Snowberg E. 2017. Digging into the pocketbook: evidence on economic voting from income registry data matched to a voter survey. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 111:4771–85
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Herrera F, Bailenson J, Weisz E, Ogle E, Zaki J. 2018. Building long-term empathy: a large-scale comparison of traditional and virtual reality perspective-taking. PLOS ONE 13:10e0204494
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Hjort J. 2014. Ethnic divisions and production in firms. Q. J. Econ. 129:41899–946
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Hopkins DJ. 2010. Politicized places: explaining where and when immigrants provoke local opposition. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 104:140–60
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Hopkins DJ, Williamson T. 2012. Inactive by design? Neighborhood design and political participation. Political Behav 34:79–101
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Horton D, Wohl RR. 1956. Mass communication and para-social interaction: observations on intimacy at a distance. Psychiatry 19:3215–29
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Ichino N, Nathan NL. 2013. Crossing the line: local ethnic geography and voting in Ghana. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 107:2344–61
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Jacobs J. 1961. The Death and Life of Great American Cities New York: Random House
  46. Johnston CD, Newman BJ. 2016. Economic inequality and US public policy mood across space and time. Am. Politics Res. 44:1164–91
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Kasara K. 2013. Separate and suspicious: local social and political context and ethnic tolerance in Kenya. J. Politics 75:4921–36
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Key VO. 1949. Southern Politics in State and Nation New York: A.A. Knopf
  49. Lee A. 2018. Ethnic diversity and ethnic discrimination: explaining local public goods. Comp. Political Stud. 51:101351–83
     [Google Scholar]
  50. LeVan C. 2020. Neighborhoods that matter: how place and people affect political participation. Am. Politics Res. 48:2286–94
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Levy Paluck E, Green SA, Green DP 2019. The contact hypothesis re-evaluated. Behav. Public Policy 3:2129–58
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Lowe M. 2021. Types of contact: a field experiment on collaborative and adversarial caste integration. Am. Econ. Rev. 111:61807–44
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Mason L, Wronski J, Kane JV. 2021. Activating animus: the uniquely social roots of Trump support. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 115:41508–16
     [Google Scholar]
  54. McClendon GH. 2018. Envy in Politics Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  55. Michener J, Brower MT. 2020. What's policy got to do with it? Race, gender and economic inequality in the United States. Daedalus 149:1100–18
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Milgram S. 1977. The familiar stranger: an aspect of urban anonymity. The Individual in a Social World51–53. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Minkoff SL, Lyons J. 2019. Living with inequality: neighborhood income diversity and perceptions of the income gap. Am. Politics Res. 47:2329–61
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Mousa S. 2020. Building social cohesion between Christians and Muslims through soccer in post-ISIS Iraq. Science 369:866–70
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Nathan NL. 2019. Electoral Politics and Africa's Urban Transition: Class and Ethnicity in Ghana New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  60. Newman BJ. 2015. A crisis in context: local conditions, national events, and economic policy mood. Am. Politics Res. 43:61041–73
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Newman O. 1972. Defensible Space: Crime Prevention Through Urban Design New York: Macmillan
  62. O'Donnell AW, Friehs MT, Bracegirdle C, Zúñiga C, Watt SE, Barlow FK. 2021. Technological and analytical advancements in intergroup contact research. J. Soc. Iss. 77:1171–96
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Oliver JE, Wong J. 2003. Intergroup prejudice in multiethnic settings. Am. J. Political Sci. 47:4567–82
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Openshaw S. 1983. The modifiable areal unit problem. Concepts and Techniques in Modern Geography Norwich, UK: Geo Books
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Paller JW. 2019. Democracy in Ghana: Everyday Politics in Urban Africa New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  66. Pettigrew TF. 1998. Intergroup contact theory. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 49:65–85
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Pettigrew TF, Tropp LR. 2006. A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. J. Pers. Soc. Pyschol. 90:5751–83
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Phillips BJ. 2017. Inequality and the emergence of vigilante organizations: the case of Mexican autodefensas. Comp. Political Stud. 50:101358–89
     [Google Scholar]
  69. Posner DN. 2005. Institutions and Ethnic Politics in Africa New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  70. Rao G. 2019. Familiarity does not breed contempt: generosity, discrimination, and diversity in Delhi schools. Am. Econ. Rev. 109:3774–809
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Robinson AL. 2020. Ethnic diversity, segregation, and ethnocentric trust in Africa. Br. J. Political Sci. 50:217–39
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Rosenzweig LR, Zhou YY. 2021. Team and nation: sports, nationalism, and attitudes toward refugees. Comp. Political Stud. 54:122123–54
     [Google Scholar]
  73. Roswell RO, Cogburn CD, Tocco J, Martinez J, Bangeranye C et al. 2020. Cultivating empathy through virtual reality: advancing conversations about racism, inequity, and climate in medicine. Acad. Med. 95:121882–86
     [Google Scholar]
  74. Rubin DB. 1980. Discussion of “Randomization Analysis of Experimental Data in the Fisher Randomization Test” by Basu. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 75:591–93
     [Google Scholar]
  75. Samii C. 2013. Perils or promise of ethnic integration? Evidence from a hard case in Burundi. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 107:3558–73
     [Google Scholar]
  76. Sampson RJ, Raudenbush SW. 1999. Systematic social observation of public spaces: a new look at disorder in urban neighborhoods. Am. J. Sociol. 105:3603–51
     [Google Scholar]
  77. Sands ML. 2017. Exposure to inequality affects support for redistribution. PNAS 114:4663–68
     [Google Scholar]
  78. Sands ML, de Kadt D. 2020. Local exposure to inequality raises support of people of low wealth for taxing the wealthy. Nature 586:7828257–61
     [Google Scholar]
  79. Sartori G. 1970. Concept misformation in comparative politics. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 64:41033–53
     [Google Scholar]
  80. Scacco A, Warren SS. 2018. Can social contact reduce prejudice and discrimination? Evidence from a field experiment in Nigeria. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 112:3654–77
     [Google Scholar]
  81. Schiappa E, Gregg PB, Hewes DE. 2005. The parasocial contact hypothesis. Commun. Monogr. 72:192–115
     [Google Scholar]
  82. Scott JC. 1998. Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
  83. Sen M, Wasow O. 2016. Race as a bundle of sticks: designs that estimate effects of seemingly immutable characteristics. Annu. Rev. Political Sci. 19:499–522
     [Google Scholar]
  84. Small ML, Adler L. 2019. The role of space in the formation of social ties. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 45:111–32
     [Google Scholar]
  85. Spater J. 2022. Exposure and preferences: evidence from Indian slums. Am. J. Political Sci. 66:2302–17
     [Google Scholar]
  86. Steinmayr A. 2021. Contact versus exposure: refugee presence and voting for the far right. Rev. Econ. Stat. 103:2310–27
     [Google Scholar]
  87. Trounstine J. 2016. Segregation and inequality in public goods. Am. J. Political Sci. 60:3709–25
     [Google Scholar]
  88. Trounstine J. 2018. Segregation by Design: Local Politics and Inequality in American Cities New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  89. van Holm EJ. 2019. Unequal cities, unequal participation: the effect of income inequality on civic engagement. Am. Rev. Public Adm. 49:2135–44
     [Google Scholar]
  90. Varshney A. 2002. Ethnic Conflict and Civic Life: Hindus and Muslims in India New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
  91. Weiss CM. 2021. Diversity in health care institutions reduces Israeli patients’ prejudice towards Arabs. PNAS 118:14e2022634118
     [Google Scholar]
  92. White FA, Harvey LJ, Abu-Rayya HM. 2015. Improving intergroup relations in the internet age: a critical review. Rev. Gen. Psychol. 19:2129–39
     [Google Scholar]
  93. White FA, Maunder R, Verrelli S. 2020. Text-based E-contact: harnessing cooperative internet interactions to bridge the social and psychological divide. Eur. Rev. Soc. Psychol. 31:176–119
     [Google Scholar]
  94. Wilkinson S. 2004. Votes and Violence: Electoral Competition and Ethnic Riots in India New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  95. Wong C, Bowers J, Williams T, Simmons KD. 2012. Bringing the person back in: boundaries, perceptions, and the measurement of racial context. J. Politics 74:41153–70
     [Google Scholar]
  96. Zacka B 2020. What's in a balcony? The in-between as public good. Political Theory and Architecture D Bell, B Zacka 81–103. London: Bloomsbury
     [Google Scholar]
  97. Zhao D. 1998. Ecologies of social movements: student mobilization during the 1989 prodemocracy movement in Beijing. Am. J. Sociol. 103:61493–529
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051421-012551
Loading
Context and Contact: Unifying the Study of Environmental Effects on Politics
Annual Review of Political Science 26, 233 (2023); https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051421-012551
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051421-012551
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051421-012551
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error