Eyewitness Science and the Legal System

Literature Cited

1. Bernstein DM, Laney C, Morris EK, Loftus EF 2005.a False memories about food can lead to food avoidance. Soc. Cogn. 23:10–33
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bernstein DM, Laney C, Morris EK, Loftus EF 2005.b False beliefs about fattening foods can have healthy consequences. PNAS 102:13724–31
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bernstein DM, Loftus EF 2009. How to tell if a particular memory is true or false. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 4:370–74
   [Google Scholar]
4. Caldwell E 1972. Angela Davis acquitted on all charges. New York Times June 5. https://archive.nytimes.com/www.nytimes.com/books/98/03/08/home/davis-acquit.html
5. Connors E, Lundregan T, Miller N, McEwen T 1998. Convicted by Juries, Exonerated by Science Alexandria, VA: Natl. Inst. Justice
6. Cutler BL 2013. Reform of Eyewitness Identification Procedures Washington, DC: Am. Psychol. Assoc. Press
7. Davis D, Loftus EF 2009. The scientific status of “repressed” and “recovered” memories of sexual abuse. Psychological Science and Non-Science in the Courtroom: Consensus and Controversy JS Skeem, KS Douglas, SO Lilienfeld 55–79 New York: Guilford
   [Google Scholar]
8. Deffenbacher KA, Loftus EF 1982. Do jurors share a common understanding concerning eyewitness behavior. Law Hum. Behav. 6:15–30
   [Google Scholar]
9. Dillon MK, Jones AM, Bergold AN, Hui CYT, Penrod SD 2017. Henderson instructions: Do they enhance evidence evaluation?. J. Forensic Psychol. Res. Pract. 17:1–24 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15228932.2017.1235964
   [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
10. Doyle JM 2005. True Witness New York: Palgrave Macmillan
11. Finer JJ 1996. Therapists' liability to the falsely accused for inducing illusory memories of childhood sexual abuse—current remedies and a proposed statute. J. Law Health 11:45–131
    [Google Scholar]
12. Frenda SJ, Nichols RM, Loftus EF 2011. Current issues and advances in misinformation research. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 20:20–23
    [Google Scholar]
13. Garrett BL 2011. Convicting the Innocent Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
14. Lepore J 2014. The Secret History of Wonder Woman New York: Knopf
15. Loftus EF 1974. Reconstructing memory: the incredible eyewitness. Psychol. Today 8:116–19
    [Google Scholar]
16. Loftus EF 1979. Eyewitness Testimony Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
17. Loftus EF 1986. Ten years in the life of an expert witness. Law Hum. Behav. 10:241–63
    [Google Scholar]
18. Loftus EF 2003. Make-believe memories. Am. Psychol. 58:864–73
    [Google Scholar]
19. Loftus EF 2005. Planting misinformation in the human mind: a 30-year investigation of the malleability of memory. Learn. Mem. 12:361–66
    [Google Scholar]
20. Loftus EF 2017. Eavesdropping on memory. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 68:1–18
    [Google Scholar]
21. Loftus EF, Davis D 2006. Recovered memories. Annu. Rev. Clin. Psychol. 2:469–98
    [Google Scholar]
22. Loftus EF, Hoffman HG 1989. Misinformation and memory: the creation of memory. J. Exp. Psychol. 118:100–4
    [Google Scholar]
23. Loftus EF, Ketcham K 1991. Witness for the Defense: The Accused, the Eyewitness, and the Expert Who Puts Memory on Trial New York: St. Martin's
24. Loftus EF, Ketcham K 1994. The Myth of Repressed Memory New York: St. Martin's
25. Loftus EF, Pickrell JE 1995. The formation of false memories. Psychiatr. Ann. 25:720–25
    [Google Scholar]
26. McNally R 2003. Remembering Trauma Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
27. Munsterberg H 1908. On the Witness Stand New York: Doubleday, Page
28. Munsterberg H 2009. On the Witness Stand Greentop, MO: Greentop Acad reissue with new forward by E. Loftus
29. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2014. Report urges caution in handling and relying upon eyewitness identification in criminal cases. Recommends best practices for law enforcement and courts Press Release Oct 2
30. Natl. Res. Counc. 2014. Identifying the Culprit: Assessing Eyewitness Identification Washington, DC: Natl. Acad. Press
31. Papalliou AP, Yokum DV, Robertson CT 2015. The novel New Jersey eyewitness instruction induces skepticism but not sensitivity. PLOS ONE 10:12e0142695 http://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142695
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
32. Patihis L, Ho LY, Tingen IW, Lilienfeld SO, Loftus EF 2014. Are the “memory wars” over? A scientist-practioner gap in beliefs about repressed memory. Psychol. Sci. 25:519–30
    [Google Scholar]
33. People v. Guzman 47 Cal. App. 3d 380, 121 Cal. Rptr 69 1975.
34. People v. Lerma 2016 IL 118496, 47 N.E. 3d 985 2016.
35. People v. McDonald 37 Cal. 3d 351, 208 Cal. Rptr. 236, 690 P. 2d 709 1984.
36. Rakoff J, Loftus EF 2018. The intractability of inaccurate eyewitness identification. Daedelus In press
37. Scheck B, Neufeld P, Dwyer J 2000. Actual Innocence New York: Doubleday
38. Schmechel RS, O'Toole TP, Easterly C, Loftus EF 2006. Beyond the ken: testing juror's understanding of eyewitness reliability evidence. Jurimetr. J. 46:177–214
    [Google Scholar]
39. Scoboria A, Wade KA, Lindsay DS, Azad T, Strange D et al. 2017. A mega-analysis of memory reports from eight peer-reviewed false memory implantation studies. Memory 25:146–63
    [Google Scholar]
40. Semmler C, Brewer N, Douglass AB 2012. Jurors believe eyewitnesses. Conviction of the Innocent BL Cutler 185–209 Washington, DC: Am. Psychol. Assoc. Press
    [Google Scholar]
41. Seven R 1993. Psychiatry of repressed memory on trial. Seattle Times July 9
42. State v. Chapple 135 Ariz. 281, 660 P. 2d 1208 1983.
43. State v. Henderson 27 A. 3d 872 (N.J 2011.
44. Wells GL, Memon AM, Penrod SD 2006. Eyewitness evidence: improving its probative value. Psychol. Sci. Public Interest 7:45–75
    [Google Scholar]
45. Wigmore JH 1909. Professor Munsterberg and the psychology of evidence. Ill. Law Rev. 3:399–445
    [Google Scholar]