The Firm As a Nexus of Organizational Theories: Sociological Perspectives on the Modern Law Firm

Literature Cited

1. Abbott A. 1988. The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
2. Abel RL. 1986. The transformation of the American legal profession. Law Soc. Rev. 20:7–17 [Google Scholar]
3. Ackroyd S, Muzio D. 2007. The reconstructed professional firm: explaining change in English legal practices. Organ. Stud. 28:729–47 [Google Scholar]
4. Akerlof GA. 1970. The market for “lemons”: quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Q. J. Econ. 84:488–500 [Google Scholar]
5. Briscoe F, Tsai W. 2011. Overcoming relational inertia: how organizational members respond to acquisition events in a law firm. Adm. Sci. Q. 56:408–40 [Google Scholar]
6. Brock DM, Leblebici H, Muzio D. 2014. Understanding professionals and their workplaces: the mission of the Journal of Professions and Organization. J. Prof. Organ. 1:1–15 [Google Scholar]
7. Burk BA, McGowan D. 2011. Big but brittle: economic perspectives on the future of the law firm in the new economy. Columbia Bus. Law Rev. 2011:1–117 [Google Scholar]
8. Caplan L. 1994. Skadden: Power, Money, and the Rise of a Legal Empire New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux
9. Chambliss E. 2009. New sources of managerial authority in large law firms. Georgetown J. Leg. Ethics 22:63–96 [Google Scholar]
10. Chambliss E. 2010. Measuring law firm culture. Stud. Law Polit. Soc. 52:1–31 [Google Scholar]
11. Chayes A, Chayes AH. 1985. Corporate counsel and the elite law firm. Stanford Law Rev 37:277–300 [Google Scholar]
12. Chen AK, Cummings S. 2012. Public Interest Lawyering: A Contemporary Perspective New York: Aspen
13. Chiu C, Leicht K. 1999. When does feminization increase equality? The case of lawyers. Law Soc. Rev. 33:557–93 [Google Scholar]
14. Cook W, Ormerod P. 2003. Power law distribution of the frequency of demises of U.S. firms. Phys. A Stat. Mech. Appl. 324:207–12 [Google Scholar]
15. Cooper DJ, Hinings B, Greenwood R, Brown JL. 1996. Sedimentation and transformation in organizational change: the case of Canadian law firms. Organ. Stud. 17:623–47 [Google Scholar]
16. DiMaggio PJ, Powell WW. 1983. The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Am. Sociol. Rev. 48:147–60 [Google Scholar]
17. Dinovitzer R. 2011. The financial rewards of elite status in the legal profession. Law Soc. Inq. 36:971–98 [Google Scholar]
18. Dinovitzer R, Garth BG. 2007. Lawyer satisfaction in the process of structuring legal careers. Law Soc. Rev. 41:1–50 [Google Scholar]
19. Edelman LB, Suchman MC. 1999. When the haves hold court: speculations on the organizational internalization of law. Law Soc. Rev. 33:941–91 [Google Scholar]
20. Empson L. 2012. Beyond dichotomies: a multi-stage model of governance in professional service firms. Handbook of Research on Entrepreneurship in Professional Services M Reihlen, A Werr 274–96 Northhampton, MA: Edward Elgar [Google Scholar]
21. Empson L, Cleaver I, Allen J. 2013. Managing partners and management professionals: institutional work dyads in professional partnerships. J. Manag. Stud. 50:808–44 [Google Scholar]
22. Faulconbridge JR, Muzio D. 2008. Organizational professionalism in globalizing law firms. Work Employ. Soc. 22:7–25 [Google Scholar]
23. Faulconbridge JR, Muzio D. 2012. Professions in a globalizing world: towards a transnational sociology of the professions. Int. Sociol. 27:136–52 [Google Scholar]
24. Fischel DR. 2000. Multidisciplinary practice. Bus. Lawyer 55:951–74 [Google Scholar]
25. Fligstein N. 1987. The intraorganizational power struggle: rise of finance personnel to top leadership in large corporations, 1919–1979. Am. Sociol. Rev. 52:44–58 [Google Scholar]
26. Fligstein N. 1990. The Transformation of Corporate Control Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
27. Fligstein N, McAdam D. 2012. A Theory of Fields New York: Oxford Univ. Press
28. Forsyth PB, Danisiewicz TJ. 1985. Toward a theory of professionalization. Work Occup 12:59–76 [Google Scholar]
29. Fox LJ. 2008. Raise the Bar: Real World Solutions for a Troubled Profession Chicago: Am. Bar Assoc.
30. Friedman LM. 2005. A History of American Law New York: Touchstone, 3rd ed..
31. Galanter M, Henderson W. 2008. The elastic tournament: the second transformation of the big law firm. Stanford Law Rev 60:1867–929 [Google Scholar]
32. Galanter M, Palay T. 1994. Tournament of Lawyers: The Transformation of the Big Law Firm Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
33. Garicano L, Santos T. 2004. Referrals. Am. Econ. Rev. 94:499–525 [Google Scholar]
34. Gilson RJ. 1984. Value creation by business lawyers: legal skills and asset pricing. Yale Law J 94:239–313 [Google Scholar]
35. Gilson RJ, Mnookin RH. 1984. Sharing among the human capitalists: an economic inquiry into the corporate law firm and how partners split profits. Stanford Law Rev 37:313–92 [Google Scholar]
36. Gilson RJ, Mnookin RH. 1989. Coming of age in a corporate law firm: the economics of associate career patterns. Stanford Law Rev 41:567–95 [Google Scholar]
37. Gilson RJ, Mnookin RH. 1990. The implicit contract for corporate law firm associates. The Firm as a Nexus of Treaties M Aoki, B Gustafsson, OE Williamson 209–36 Newbury Park, CA: Sage [Google Scholar]
38. Gorman EH. 1999. Moving away from “up or out”: determinants of permanent employment in law firms. Law Soc. Rev. 33:637–66 [Google Scholar]
39. Granovetter M. 1985. Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness. Am. J. Sociol. 91:481–510 [Google Scholar]
40. Granovetter M. 2005. The impact of social structure on economic outcomes. J. Econ. Perspect. 19:33–50 [Google Scholar]
41. Greenwood R, Lachman R. 1996. Change as an underlying theme in professional service organizations: an introduction. Organ. Stud. 17:563–72 [Google Scholar]
42. Greenwood R, Suddaby R. 2006. Professional Service Firms Oxford: Elsevier JAI
43. Hadfield GK. 2008. Legal barriers to innovation: the growing economic cost of professional control over corporate legal markets. Stanford Law Rev 60:101–46 [Google Scholar]
44. Halliday TC. 1987. Beyond Monopoly: Lawyers, State Crises, and Professional Empowerment Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
45. Hannan MT, Freeman J. 1993. Organizational Ecology Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
46. Haveman HA. 1993. Follow the leader: mimetic isomorphism and entry into new markets. Adm. Sci. Q. 38:593–627 [Google Scholar]
47. Heinz JP. 2009. When law firms fail. Suffolk Univ. Law Rev. 43:67–78 [Google Scholar]
48. Heinz JP, Laumann EO. 1982. Chicago Lawyers: The Social Structure of the Bar New York: Russell Sage Found.
49. Heinz JP, Laumann EO, Nelson RL, Schnorr PS. 1997. The constituencies of elite urban lawyers. Law Soc. Rev. 31:441–72 [Google Scholar]
50. Heinz JP, Nelson RL, Laumann EO. 2001. The scale of justice: observations on the transformation of urban law practice. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 27:337–62 [Google Scholar]
51. Heinz JP, Nelson RL, Sandefur RL, Laumann EO. 2005. Urban Lawyers: The New Social Structure of the Bar Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
52. Henderson WD, Bierman L. 2009. An empirical analysis of lateral lawyer trends from 2000 to 2007: the emerging equilibrium for corporate law firms. Georgetown J. Leg. Ethics 22:1395–430 [Google Scholar]
53. Hitt MA, Bierman L, Shimizu K, Kochhar R. 2001. Direct and moderating effects of human capital on strategy and performance in professional service firms: a resource-based perspective. Acad. Manag. J. 44:13–28 [Google Scholar]
54. Hobson WK. 1984. Symbol of the new profession: emergence of the large law firm, 1870–1915. The New High Priests: Lawyers in Post-Civil War America GW Gawalt 17–19 Westport, CT: Praeger [Google Scholar]
55. Hull KE, Nelson RL. 2000. Assimilation, choice, or constraint? Testing theories of gender differences in the careers of lawyers. Soc. Forces 79:229–64 [Google Scholar]
56. Hurst JW. 1950. The Growth of American Law Clark, NJ: Lawbook Exchange
57. Iacobucci EM. 2012. Reputational economies of scale, with application to law firms. Am. Law Econ. Rev. 14:302–29 [Google Scholar]
58. Kagan RA, Rosen RE. 1984. On the social significance of large law firm practice. Stanford Law Rev 37:399–443 [Google Scholar]
59. Kay FM, Gorman E. 2008. Women in the legal profession. Annu. Rev. Law Soc. Sci. 4:299–332 [Google Scholar]
60. Kay FM, Gorman E. 2012. Developmental practices, organizational culture, and minority representation in organizational leadership: the case of partners in large U.S. law firms. Ann. Am. Acad. Polit. Soc. Sci. 639:91–113 [Google Scholar]
61. Kay FM, Wallace JE. 2010. Is more truly merrier? Mentoring and the practice of law. Can. Rev. Sociol. 47:1–26 [Google Scholar]
62. Kim HH. 2009. Networks, information transfer, and status conferral: the role of social capital in income stratification among lawyers. Sociol. Q. 50:61–87 [Google Scholar]
63. Kordana KA. 1995. Law firms and associate careers: tournament theory versus the production-imperative model. Yale Law J 104:1907–34 [Google Scholar]
64. Krippner GR. 2005. The financialization of the American economy. Socio-Econ. Rev. 3:173–208 [Google Scholar]
65. Ladinsky J. 1963. Careers of lawyers, law practice, and legal institutions. Am. Sociol. Rev. 28:47–54 [Google Scholar]
66. Larson MS. 1977. The Rise of Professionalism: Monopolies of Competence and Sheltered Markets New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction
67. Lazega E. 2001. The Collegial Phenomenon: The Social Mechanisms of Co-Operation Among Peers in a Corporate Law Partnership Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press
68. Lazega E. 2005. A theory of collegiality and its relevance for understanding professions and knowledge-intensive organizations. Organisation und Profession T Klatetzki, V Tacke 221–52 Wiesbaden, Ger.: Springer [Google Scholar]
69. Lazega E, van Duijn M. 1997. Position in formal structure, personal characteristics and choices of advisors in a law firm: a logistic regression model for dyadic network data. Soc. Netw. 19:375–97 [Google Scholar]
70. Leahey E, Hunter LA. 2012. Lawyers' lines of work: specialization's role in the income determination process. Soc. Forces 90:1101–31 [Google Scholar]
71. Leicht KT, Fennell ML. 1997. The changing organizational context of professional work. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 23:215–31 [Google Scholar]
72. Levin J, Tadelis S. 2005. Profit sharing and the role of professional partnerships. Q. J. Econ. 120:131–71 [Google Scholar]
73. Liu S. 2013. The legal profession as a social process: a theory on lawyers and globalization. Law Soc. Inq. 38:670–93 [Google Scholar]
74. Llewellyn KN. 1934. Bar specialized with what results. Commer. Law J. 39:336–43 [Google Scholar]
75. Malhotra N, Morris T, Hinings CR. 2006. Variation in organizational form among professional service organizations. Res. Sociol. Organ. 24:171–202 [Google Scholar]
76. McEvily B, Jaffee J, Tortoriello M. 2012. Not all bridging ties are equal: network imprinting and firm growth in the Nashville legal industry, 1933–1978. Organ. Sci. 23:547–63 [Google Scholar]
77. Meyer JW, Rowan B. 1977. Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony. Am. J. Sociol. 83:340–63 [Google Scholar]
78. Mills CW. 1951. White Collar: The American Middle Classes Oxford: Oxford Univ. Press
79. Moorhead R. 2010. Lawyer specialization—managing the professional paradox. Law Policy 32:226–59 [Google Scholar]
80. Muzio D, Brock DM, Suddaby R. 2013. Professions and institutional change: towards an institutionalist sociology of the professions. J. Manag. Stud. 50:699–721 [Google Scholar]
81. Muzio D, Kirkpatrick I. 2011. Introduction: professions and organizations—a conceptual framework. Curr. Sociol. 59:389–405 [Google Scholar]
82. National Law Journal 2012. What happened to the top firms of 1978?. National Law Journal, April 9. http://www.nationallawjournal.com/id=1202548253038?slreturn=20160015080957 [Google Scholar]
83. Nelson RL. 1988. Partners with Power: Social Transformation of the Large Law Firm Oakland: Univ. Calif. Press
84. Nelson RL, Nielsen LB. 2000. Cops, counsel, and entrepreneurs: constructing the role of inside counsel in large corporations. Law Soc. Rev. 34:457–94 [Google Scholar]
85. Nielsen LB, Albiston CR. 2005. The organization of public interest practice: 1975–2004. N.C. Law Rev. 84:1591–622 [Google Scholar]
86. Olson E. 2014. Revenues at the top 100 law firms rose 5.4% last year. New York Times April 28. http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2014/04/28/revenues-at-the-top-100-law-firms-rose-5-4-last-year/ [Google Scholar]
87. Parsons T. 1954. Essays in Sociological Theory New York: Simon & Schuster
88. Patton PA. 2005. Large law firms and their role in the educational continuum of lawyers. Fordham Urban Law J 33:233–44 [Google Scholar]
89. Payne-Pikus MR, Hagan J, Nelson RL. 2010. Experiencing discrimination: race and retention in America's largest law firms. Law Soc. Rev. 44:553–84 [Google Scholar]
90. Pfeffer J, Salancik G. 2003. The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective Palo Alto, CA: Stanford Bus. Books
91. Phillips DJ. 2001. The promotion paradox: organizational mortality and employee promotion chances in silicon valley law firms, 1946–1996. Am. J. Sociol. 106:1058–98 [Google Scholar]
92. Phillips DJ. 2002. A genealogical approach to organizational life chances: the parent-progeny transfer among Silicon Valley law firms, 1946–1996. Adm. Sci. Q. 47:474–506 [Google Scholar]
93. Phillips DJ, Turco CJ, Zuckerman EW. 2013. Betrayal as market barrier: identity-based limits to diversification among high-status corporate law firms. Am. J. Sociol. 118:1023–54 [Google Scholar]
94. Pinansky TP. 1986. The emergence of law firms in the American legal profession. Univ. Ark. Little Rock Law J. 9:593–640 [Google Scholar]
95. Pinnington A, Morris T. 2003. Archetype change in professional organizations: survey evidence from large law firms. Br. J. Manag. 14:85–99 [Google Scholar]
96. Powell WW, DiMaggio PJ. 1991. The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
97. Rebitzer JB, Taylor LJ. 2006. When Knowledge Is an Asset: Explaining the Organizational Structure of Large Law Firms Washington, DC: Natl. Bur. Econ. Res.
98. Regan M. 2002. Corporate norms and contemporary law firm practice. George Wash. Law Rev. 70:931–43 [Google Scholar]
99. Ribstein LE. 1998. Ethical rules, agency costs, and law firm structure. Va. Law Rev. 84:1707–59 [Google Scholar]
100. Ribstein LE. 2010. The death of big law. Wis. Law Rev. 2010:749–816 [Google Scholar]
101. Rosen RE. 2010. Rejecting the culture of independence: corporate lawyers as committed to their clients. Stud. Law Polit. Soc. 52:33–71 [Google Scholar]
102. Salancik GR. 1995. Wanted: a good network theory of organization. Adm. Sci. Q. 40:345–49 [Google Scholar]
103. Scott WR. 1987. The adolescence of institutional theory. Adm. Sci. Q. 32:493–511 [Google Scholar]
104. Scott WR. 2005. Evolving professions: an institutional field approach. Organisation und Profession T Klatetzki, V Tacke 119–42 Wiesbaden, Ger.: Springer [Google Scholar]
105. Seron C. 2007. The status of legal professionalism at the close of the twentieth century: Chicago lawyers and urban lawyers. Law Soc. Inq. 32:581–607 [Google Scholar]
106. Sherer PD. 1995. Leveraging human assets in law firms: human capital structures and organizational capabilities. Ind. Labor Relat. Rev. 48:671–91 [Google Scholar]
107. Sherer PD, Lee K. 2002. Institutional change in large law firms: a resource dependency and institutional perspective. Acad. Manag. J. 45:102–19 [Google Scholar]
108. Smigel EO. 1969. The Wall Street Lawyer, Professional Organization Man? Bloomington: Indiana Univ. Press
109. Spar DL. 1997. Lawyers abroad: the internationalization of legal practice. Calif. Manag. Rev. 39:8–28 [Google Scholar]
110. Spence M. 1973. Job market signaling. Q. J. Econ. 87:355–74 [Google Scholar]
111. Stinchcombe AL. 1965. Social structure and organizations. Handbook of Organizations JG March 142–93 New York: Routledge [Google Scholar]
112. Stroud S. 2001. Non-compete agreements: weighing the interests of profession and firm. Ala. Law Rev. 53:1023–42 [Google Scholar]
113. Suchman MC, Edelman LB. 1996. Legal rational myths: the new institutionalism and the law and society tradition. Law Soc. Inq. 21:903–41 [Google Scholar]
114. Swaine RT. 1948. The Cravath Firm and Its Predecessors, 1819–1948 Clark, NJ: Lawbook Exchange
115. Tolbert PS. 1988. Institutional sources of organizational culture in major law firms. Institutional Patterns and Organizations: Culture and Environment LG Zucker 101–13 Boston: Ballinger [Google Scholar]
116. Tolbert PS, Stern RN. 1991. Organizations of professionals. governance structures in large law firms. Research in the Sociology of Organizations PS Tolbert SR Barley 97–118 Greenwich, CT: JAI Press [Google Scholar]
117. Triedman J. 2015. How Bingham failed: the inside story. The American Lawyer Jan 14 . http://www.americanlawyer.com/id=1202713087826/How-Bingham-Failed-The-Inside-Story
118. Uzzi B. 1996. The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: the network effect. Am. Sociol. Rev. 61:674–98 [Google Scholar]
119. Uzzi B, Lancaster R. 2004. Embeddedness and price formation in the corporate law market. Am. Sociol. Rev. 69:319–44 [Google Scholar]
120. Von Nordenflycht A. 2010. What is a professional service firm? Toward a theory and taxonomy of knowledge-intensive firms. Acad. Manag. Rev. 35:155–74 [Google Scholar]
121. Wallace JE. 1995. Corporatist control and organizational commitment among professionals: the case of lawyers working in law firms. Soc. Forces 73:811–40 [Google Scholar]
122. Wallace JE, Kay FM. 2009. Are small firms more beautiful or is bigger better? A study of compensating differentials and law firm internal labor markets. Sociol. Q. 50:474–96 [Google Scholar]
123. Weber M. 1978. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology Oakland: Univ. Calif. Press
124. Wilkins DB, Coates JC, DeStefano MM, Nanda A. 2011. Hiring teams, firms, and lawyers: evidence of the evolving relationships in the corporate legal market. Law Soc. Inq. 36:999–1031 [Google Scholar]
125. Wilkins DB, Gulati GM. 1998. Reconceiving the tournament of lawyers: tracking, seeding, and information control in the internal labor markets of elite law firms. Va. Law Rev. 84:1581–681 [Google Scholar]
126. Wilson L. 2012. Financing professional partnerships. J. Econ. Financ. 36:58–92 [Google Scholar]
127. Zucker LG. 1987. Institutional theories of organization. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 13:443–64 [Google Scholar]