1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Political Science
  4. Volume 26, 2023
  5. Article

Annual Review of Political Science

Volume 26, 2023

Women and Power in the Developing World

Abstract

What do we know about women's negotiation of power in the Global South? The prevailing view tells us that women's power in the Global North is greater than in the South. Yet across analytic levels, the developing world provides striking models of the assertion of women's power that challenge established concepts of political and economic development. At the macro level of state development, research identifies how the subordination of women has been central to the creation and modern infrastructure of liberal democratic states or political orders. Data analysis here provides complementary evidence that the most effective alternatives to patriarchal political orders are originating in the developing world. At the meso level of policy-making processes, developing-world states are more likely than developed-world states to recognize and co-opt women's power. Finally, at the micro level, intrafamily negotiations of patriarchal power are most dynamic in the developing world, with the greatest promise to improve our understanding of the broader systems of power that drive states, policies, and welfare.

Keyword(s): comparative political development, electoral quotas, gender equality, intrafamily bargaining, state formation, women in politics
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-062121-081831
2023-06-15
2024-04-27
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/polisci/26/1/annurev-polisci-062121-081831.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-062121-081831&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Acemoglu D, Robinson JA. 2020. The Narrow Corridor: States, Societies, and the Fate of Liberty New York, NY: Penguin
  2. Anandhi S. 2003. The women's question in the Dravidian Movement c. 1925–48. Gender and Caste A Rao 141–63. London: Zed
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Baldez L. 2002. Why Women Protest: Women's Movements in Chile New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  4. Barnes TD. 2016. Gendering Legislative Behavior: Institutional Constraints and Collaboration New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  5. Basu A 2018. Introduction. Women's Movements in the Global Era: The Power of Local Feminisms A Basu 1–33. New York: Routledge
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Beaman L, Duflo E, Pande R, Topalova P. 2012. Female leadership raises aspirations and educational attainment for girls: a policy experiment in India. Science 335:6068582–86
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Beckwith K. 1986. American Women and Political Participation: The Impacts of Work, Generation, and Feminism Westport, CT: Praeger
  8. Berezkin Y. 2015. Folklore and mythology catalogue: its lay-out and potential for research. Retrosp. Methods Netw. Newsl. 10:58–70
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Bernhard R, Shames S, Teele D. 2021. To emerge? Breadwinning, motherhood, and women's decisions to run for office. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 115:2379–94
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Bhalotra S, Brulé R, Roy S 2020. Women's inheritance rights reform and the preference for sons in India. J. Dev. Econ. 146:102275
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Bhalotra S, Clots-Figueras I. 2014. Health and the political agency of women. Am. Econ. J. Econ. Policy 6:2164–97
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Bott E. 1982. Tongan Society at the Time of Captain Cook's Visits: Discussions With Her Majesty The Queen Salote Tupou, written with assistance by Tavi Wellington, NZ: Polynesian Society
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Boulding E. 1976. The Underside of History: A View of Women Through Time Boulder, CO: Westview Press
  14. Brulé R. 2020a. Reform, representation, and resistance: the politics of property rights' enforcement. J. Politics 82:41390–405
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Brulé R 2020b. Women, Power, and Property: The Paradox of Gender Equality Laws in India Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  16. Brulé R. 2023. Climate shocks and gendered political transformation: how crises alter women's political representation. Politics Gender In press. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X22000393
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Brulé R, Chauchard S, Heinze A. 2022. Are husbands the problem?. Seminar 752:24–29
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Brulé R, Gaikwad N. 2021. Culture, capital, and the political economy gender gap: evidence from Meghalaya's matrilineal tribes. J. Politics 83:3834–50
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Brulé R, Tóth A. 2022. Do quotas in two dimensions improve social equality? Intersectional representation & group relations Work. Pap., Boston Univ. Boston, MA:
  20. Burns N, Scholzman K, Verba S. 2001. The Private Roots of Public Action: Gender, Equality, and Political Participation Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  21. Bush SS. 2011. International politics and the spread of quotas for women in legislatures. Int. Org. 65:1103–37
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Bush SS, Jamal AA. 2015. Anti-Americanism, authoritarian politics, and attitudes about women's representation: evidence from a survey experiment in Jordan. Int. Stud. Q. 59:34–45
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Cent. Reproductive Rights 2021. The world's abortion laws. Cent. Reproductive Rights accessed June 30, 2022. https://reproductiverights.org/maps/worlds-abortion-laws/
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Charrad MM. 2001. States and Women's Rights: The Making of Postcolonial Tunisia, Algeria, and Morocco Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
  25. Chattopadhyay R, Duflo E. 2004. Women as policy makers: evidence from a randomized policy experiment in India. Econometrica 72:51409–43
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Cheema A, Khan S, Liaqat A, Mohmand SK. 2023. Canvassing the gatekeepers: a field experiment to increase women voters' turnout in Pakistan. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 11711–21
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Clayton A. 2021. How do electoral gender quotas affect policy?. Annu. Rev. Political Sci. 24:235–52
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Clayton A, Zetterberg P. 2018. Quota shocks: electoral gender quotas and government spending priorities worldwide. J. Politics 80:3916–32
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Cohen DK, Karim SM. 2021. Does more equality mean less war? Rethinking sex and gender equality and political violence. Int. Org. 76:2414–44
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Crenshaw K. 1989. Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: a black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. Univ. Chicago Legal Forum 140:139–67
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Dahlerup D. 2018. Has Democracy Failed Women? New York, NY: Polity Press
  32. Darlington CD. 1969. The Evolution of Man and Society New York: Simon and Schuster
  33. Dovi S. 2002. Preferable descriptive representatives: Will just any woman, Black, or Latino do?. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 96:4729–43
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Evans A. 2022. 10,000 years of patriarchy!. Dr. Alice Evans Blog. https://www.draliceevans.com/post/ten-thousand-years-of-patriarchy-1
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Ferguson KE. 2017. Feminist theory today. Annu. Rev. Political Sci. 20:269–86
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Fernández R. 2014. Women's rights and development. J. Econ. Growth 19:137–80
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Field E, Jayachandra S, Pande R, Rigol N. 2016. Friendship at work: Can peer effects catalyze female entrepreneurship?. Am. Econ. J. Econ. Policy 8:2125–53
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Finnemore M, Sikkink K. 1998. International norm dynamics and political change. Int. Org. 52:4887–917
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Franceschet S, Piscopo J. 2008. Gender quotas and women's substantive representation: lessons from Argentina. Politics Gender 4:392–425
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Folbre N. 2021. The Rise and Decline of Patriarchal Systems New York: Verso
  41. Gailey CW. 1987. Kinship to Kingship: Gender Hierarchy and State Formation in the Tongan Islands Austin: Univ. Texas Press
  42. Gay C, Tate K. 1998. Doubly bound: the impact of gender and race on the politics of Black women. Political Psychol 19:1169–84
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Goldin C. 2006. The quiet revolution that transformed women's employment, education, and family. Am. Econ. Rev. 96:21–21
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Goyal T. 2022. Representation from below: how women's grassroots party activism promotes equal political participation Work. Pap., Princeton Univ. Princeton, NJ:
  45. Grzymała-Busse A. 2015. Nations Under God: How Churches Use Moral Authority to Influence Policy Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  46. Harvey A. 1998. Votes Without Leverage: Women in American Electoral Politics, 1920–1970 New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  47. Htun M. 2003. Sex and the State: Abortion, Divorce, and the Family Under Latin American Dictatorships and Democracies Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  48. Htun M, Weldon SL. 2018. The Logics of Gender Justice: State Action on Women's Rights Around the World Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  49. Hudson VM, Bowen DL, Nielsen PL. 2020. The First Political Order: How Sex Shapes Governance and National Security Worldwide New York: Columbia Univ. Press
  50. IDMC (Intern. Displac. Monit. Cent.) 2022. GRID 2022: children and youth in internal displacement Rep., IDMC Geneva: https://www.internal-displacement.org/global-report/grid2022/#download
  51. Inglehart R, Norris P. 2003. Rising Tide: Gender Equality and Cultural Change Around the World New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  52. Inter-Parliamentary Union 2022. Parline: global data on national parliaments Database, Inter-Parliamentary Union Geneva: https://data.ipu.org/
  53. Iversen T, Rosenbluth FM. 2010. Women, Work and Politics New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
  54. Kandiyoti D. 1988. Bargaining with patriarchy. Politics Gender 2:3274–90
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Khan S. 2021. Count me out: gendered preference expression in Pakistan Work. Pap., Yale Univ. New Haven, CT:
  56. Kirkpatrick J. 2017. The Virtues of Exit: On Resistance and Quitting Politics Raleigh: Univ. N. C. Press
  57. Krook ML. 2009. Quotas for Women in Politics: Gender and Candidate Selection Reform Worldwide New York: Oxford Univ. Press
  58. Lawless JL. 2015. Female candidates and legislators. Annu. Rev. Political Sci. 18:349–66
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Lazarev E. 2019. Laws in conflict: legacies of war, gender, and legal pluralism in Chechnya. World Politics 71:4667–709
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Lerner G. 1986. The Creation of Patriarchy New York: Oxford Univ. Press
  61. Levi M. 1988. Of Rule and Revenue Berkeley: Univ. Calif. Press
  62. MacKinnon C. 1989. Towards a Feminist Theory of the State Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  63. Manne K. 2017. Down Girl: The Logic of Misogyny New York: Oxford Univ. Press
  64. Mansbridge J. 1999. Should Blacks represent Blacks and women represent women? A contingent “yes. .” J. Politics 61:3628–57
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Marino KM. 2019. Feminism for the Americas: The Making of an International Human Rights Movement Chapel Hill: Univ. N. C. Press
  66. Mellaart J. 1965. Earliest Civilizations of the Near East New York: McGraw-Hill
  67. Mendelberg T, Karpowitz C. 2014. The Silent Sex: Gender, Deliberation and Institutions Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  68. Michalopoulos S, Naghavi A, Prarolo G. 2018. Trade and geography in the spread of Islam. Econ. J. 128:3210–41
     [Google Scholar]
  69. Michalopoulos S, Xue MM. 2021. Folklore. Q. J. Econ. 136:41993–2046
     [Google Scholar]
  70. Murdock GP. 1967. Ethnographic Atlas: A Summary Pittsburgh, PA: Univ. Pittsburgh Press
  71. North DC, Wallis JJ, Weingast BR. 2009. Violence and Social Orders: A Conceptual Framework for Interpreting Recorded Human History New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  72. O'Brien DZ, Rickne J 2016. Gender quotas and women's access to leadership posts. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 110:1112–26
     [Google Scholar]
  73. Okin SM. 1989. Justice, Gender and the Family New York: Basic Books
  74. Pateman C. 1988. The Sexual Contract New York: Polity Press
  75. Paulsen T, Scheve K, Stasavage D. 2023. Foundations of a new democracy: schooling, inequality, and voting in the early republic. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 1172518–36
     [Google Scholar]
  76. Piketty T. 2022. A Brief History of Equality transl. S Rendall Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  77. Prillaman SA. 2023. Strength in numbers: how women's groups close India's political gender gap. Am. J. Political Sci. In press. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12651
    [Google Scholar]
  78. Purohit B. 2021. Gendered bureaucratic resistance against female politicians: evidence from Telangana, India Work. Pap., Princeton Univ. Princeton, NJ:
  79. Robinson AL, Gottlieb J. 2021. How to close the gender gap in political participation: lessons from matrilineal societies in Africa. Br. J. Political Sci. 51:168–92
     [Google Scholar]
  80. Rubin G. 1975. The traffic in women: notes on the ‘political economy’ of sex. Toward an Anthropology of Women RR Reiter 157–210. New York: Monthly Rev. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  81. Sanday PR. 1981. Female Power and Male Dominance: On the Origins of Sexual Inequality New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  82. Sapiro V. 1981. When are interests interesting? The problem of political representation of women. Am. Political Sci. Rev. 75:3701–16
     [Google Scholar]
  83. Sen S. 2002. Toward a feminist politics? The Indian women's movement in historical perspective. The Violence of Development: The Politics of Identity, Gender, and Social Inequalities in India K Kapodia 459–525. New Delhi: Zubaan
     [Google Scholar]
  84. Scott JC. 2009. The Art of Not Being Governed: An Anarchist History of Upland Southeast Asia New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
  85. Scott JC. 2017. Against the Grain: A Deep History of the Earliest States New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
  86. Shalaby M 2016. Challenges facing women's political participation post Arab Spring: the case of Egypt and Tunisia. Empowering Women After the Arab Spring M Shalaby, VM Moghadam 171–91. New York: Palgrave Macmillan
     [Google Scholar]
  87. Silverblatt IM. 1987. Moon, Sun, and Witches: Gender Ideologies and Class in Inca and Colonial Peru Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  88. Singh P. 2015. How Solidarity Works for Welfare: Subnationalism and Social Development in India New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  89. Skocpol T. 1995. Protecting Soldiers and Mothers Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  90. Sreenivas M. 2021. Reproductive Politics and the Making of Modern India Seattle: Univ. Wash. Press
  91. Srinivasan A. 2021. The Right to Sex: Feminism in the Twenty-First Century New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux
  92. Stasavage D. 2020. The Decline and Rise of Democracy: A Global History from Antiquity to Today Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  93. Stevens J. 1999. Reproducing the State Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  94. Strolovitch D. 2023. When Bad Things Happen to Privileged People: Race, Gender, and What Makes a Crisis in America Chicago, IL: Univ. Chicago Press
  95. Teele DL. 2018. Forging the Franchise: The Political Origins of the Women's Vote Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  96. Thompson D. 2016. The Schematic State: Race, Transnationalism, and the Politics of the Census New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  97. Tilly C. 1975. The Formation of National States in Western Europe Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  98. Towns AE. 2010. Women and States: Norms and Hierarchies in International Society Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  99. Tripp AM. 2015. Women and Power in Postconflict Africa New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  100. Tripp AM. 2019. Seeking Legitimacy: Why Arab Autocracies Adopt Women's Rights Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  101. Tudor C 2022. Whose modernity? Revolution and the rights of women PhD Diss., Princeton Univ. Princeton, NJ:
  102. Wolbrecht C. 2000. The Politics of Women's Rights: Parties, Positions, and Change Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  103. World Bank 2022. Women, business and the law 2022 Rep., World Bank Washington, DC:
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-062121-081831
Loading
Women and Power in the Developing World
Annual Review of Political Science 26, 33 (2023); https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-062121-081831
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-062121-081831
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-062121-081831
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error