1932

Abstract

In eukaryotes, the synthesis and uptake of sterols undergo stringent multivalent regulation. Both individual enzymes and transcriptional networks are controlled to meet changing needs of the many sterol pathway products. Regulation is tailored by evolution to match regulatory constraints, which can be very different in distinct species. Nevertheless, a broadly conserved feature of many aspects of sterol regulation is employment of proteostasis mechanisms to bring about control of individual proteins. Proteostasis is the set of processes that maintain homeostasis of a dynamic proteome. Proteostasis includes protein quality control pathways for the detection, and then the correction or destruction, of the many misfolded proteins that arise as an unavoidable feature of protein-based life. Protein quality control displays not only the remarkable breadth needed to manage the wide variety of client molecules, but also extreme specificity toward the misfolded variants of a given protein. These features are amenable to evolutionary usurpation as a means to regulate proteins, and this approach has been used in sterol regulation. We describe both well-trod and less familiar versions of the interface between proteostasis and sterol regulation and suggest some underlying ideas with broad biological and clinical applicability.

Keyword(s): ERADHMG-CoA reductaseHrd1INSIGSCAPSSD
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-cellbio-111315-125036
2017-10-06
2024-06-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/cellbio/33/1/annurev-cellbio-111315-125036.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-cellbio-111315-125036&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Abumrad NA, Davidson NO. 2012. Role of the gut in lipid homeostasis. Physiol. Rev. 92:31061–85 [Google Scholar]
  2. Adams CM, Goldstein JL, Brown MS. 2003. Cholesterol-induced conformational change in SCAP enhanced by Insig proteins and mimicked by cationic amphiphiles. PNAS 100:1910647–52 [Google Scholar]
  3. Adams CM, Reitz J, De Brabander JK, Feramisco JD, Li L. et al. 2004. Cholesterol and 25-hydroxycholesterol inhibit activation of SREBPs by different mechanisms, both involving SCAP and Insigs. J. Biol. Chem. 279:5052772–80 [Google Scholar]
  4. Altmann SW, Davis HR, Zhu L-J, Yao X, Hoos LM. et al. 2004. Niemann-Pick C1 like 1 protein is critical for intestinal cholesterol absorption. Science 303:56611201–4 [Google Scholar]
  5. Amm I, Sommer T, Wolf DH. 2014. Protein quality control and elimination of protein waste: the role of the ubiquitin-proteasome system. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell Res 18431182–96 [Google Scholar]
  6. Araki K, Nagata K. 2011. Protein folding and quality control in the ER. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 3:11a007526 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bays NW, Gardner RG, Seelig LP, Joazeiro CA, Hampton RY. 2001. Hrd1p/Der3p is a membrane-anchored ubiquitin ligase required for ER-associated degradation. Nat. Cell Biol. 3:124–29 [Google Scholar]
  8. Beg ZH, Stonik JA, Brewer HB. 1985. Phosphorylation of hepatic 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase and modulation of its enzymic activity by calcium-activated and phospholipid-dependent protein kinase. J. Biol. Chem. 260:31682–87 [Google Scholar]
  9. Bernier V, Lagacé M, Bichet DG, Bouvier M. 2004. Pharmacological chaperones: potential treatment for conformational diseases. Trends Endocrinol. Metab. 15:5222–28 [Google Scholar]
  10. Bloch K. 1965. The biological synthesis of cholesterol. Science 150:369219–28 [Google Scholar]
  11. Bordallo J, Plemper RK, Finger A, Wolf DH. 1998. Der3p/Hrd1p is required for endoplasmic reticulum–associated degradation of misfolded lumenal and integral membrane proteins. Mol. Biol. Cell 9:1209–22 [Google Scholar]
  12. Brodsky JL. 2012. Cleaning up: ER-associated degradation to the rescue. Cell 151:61163–67 [Google Scholar]
  13. Brodsky JL, Skach WR. 2011. Protein folding and quality control in the endoplasmic reticulum: recent lessons from yeast and mammalian cell systems. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 23:4464–75 [Google Scholar]
  14. Brown AJ, Sun L, Feramisco JD, Brown MS, Goldstein JL. 2002. Cholesterol addition to ER membranes alters conformation of SCAP, the SREBP escort protein that regulates cholesterol metabolism. Mol. Cell 10:2237–45 [Google Scholar]
  15. Brown MS, Dana SE, Goldstein JL. 1973. Regulation of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase activity in human fibroblasts by lipoproteins. PNAS 70:72162–66 [Google Scholar]
  16. Brown MS, Goldstein JL. 1974. Familial hypercholesterolemia: defective binding of lipoproteins to cultured fibroblasts associated with impaired regulation of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase activity. PNAS 71:3788–92 [Google Scholar]
  17. Brown MS, Goldstein JL. 2008. Cholesterol feedback: from Schoenheimer's bottle to Scap's MELADL. J. Lipid Res. 50:Suppl.15–27 [Google Scholar]
  18. Burg JS, Powell DW, Chai R, Hughes AL, Link AJ, Espenshade PJ. 2008. Insig regulates HMG-CoA reductase by controlling enzyme phosphorylation in fission yeast. Cell Metab 8:6522–31 [Google Scholar]
  19. Chen B, Retzlaff M, Roos T, Frydman J. 2011. Cellular strategies of protein quality control. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 3:8a004374 [Google Scholar]
  20. Davies JP, Levy B, Ioannou YA. 2000. Evidence for a Niemann-Pick C (NPC) gene family: identification and characterization of NPC1L1. Genomics 65:2137–45 [Google Scholar]
  21. Edwards PA, Lan SF, Fogelman AM. 1983. Alterations in the rates of synthesis and degradation of rat liver 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase produced by cholestyramine and mevinolin. J. Biol. Chem. 258:1710219–22 [Google Scholar]
  22. Fang S, Ferrone M, Yang C, Jensen JP, Tiwari S, Weissman AM. 2001. The tumor autocrine motility factor receptor, gp78, is a ubiquitin protein ligase implicated in degradation from the endoplasmic reticulum. PNAS 98:2514422 [Google Scholar]
  23. Faulkner RA, Nguyen AD, Jo Y, DeBose-Boyd RA. 2013. Lipid-regulated degradation of HMG-CoA reductase and Insig-1 through distinct mechanisms in insect cells. J. Lipid Res. 54:41011–22 [Google Scholar]
  24. Favari E, Chroni A, Tietge UJF, Zanotti I, Escolà-Gil JC, Bernini F. 2015. Cholesterol efflux and reverse cholesterol transport. Handb. Exp. Pharmacol. 224:181–206 [Google Scholar]
  25. Fitzky BU, Witsch-Baumgartner M, Erdel M, Lee JN, Paik YK. et al. 1998. Mutations in the Δ7-sterol reductase gene in patients with the Smith-Lemli-Opitz syndrome. PNAS 95:148181–86 [Google Scholar]
  26. Flury I, Garza R, Shearer A, Rosen J, Cronin S, Hampton RY. 2005. INSIG: a broadly conserved transmembrane chaperone for sterol-sensing domain proteins. EMBO J 24:223917–26 [Google Scholar]
  27. Foresti O, Ruggiano A, Hannibal-Bach HK, Ejsing CS, Carvalho P. 2013. Sterol homeostasis requires regulated degradation of squalene monooxygenase by the ubiquitin ligase Doa10/Teb4. eLife 2013:2e00953 [Google Scholar]
  28. Fuhrer F, Langklotz S, Narberhaus F. 2006. The C-terminal end of LpxC is required for degradation by the FtsH protease. Mol. Microbiol. 59:31025–36 [Google Scholar]
  29. Gardner R, Cronin S, Leader B, Rine J, Hampton R, Leder B. 1998. Sequence determinants for regulated degradation of yeast 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase, an integral endoplasmic reticulum membrane protein. Mol. Biol. Cell 9:92611–26 [Google Scholar]
  30. Gardner RG, Hampton RY. 1999. A highly conserved signal controls degradation of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase in eukaryotes. J. Biol. Chem. 274:4431671–78 [Google Scholar]
  31. Gardner RG, Shearer AG, Hampton RY. 2001. In vivo action of the HRD ubiquitin ligase complex: mechanisms of endoplasmic reticulum quality control and sterol regulation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 21:134276–91 [Google Scholar]
  32. Gardner RG, Swarbrick GM, Bays NW, Cronin SR, Wilhovsky S. et al. 2000. Endoplasmic reticulum degradation requires lumen to cytosol signaling. Transmembrane control of Hrd1p by Hrd3p. J. Cell Biol. 151:169–82 [Google Scholar]
  33. Garza RM, Tran PN, Hampton RY. 2009. Geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate is a potent regulator of HRD-dependent 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase degradation in yeast. J. Biol. Chem. 284:5135368–80 [Google Scholar]
  34. Geelen MJ, Gibson DM, Rodwell VW. 1986. Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA reductase—the rate-limiting enzyme of cholesterol biosynthesis. FEBS Lett 201:2183–86 [Google Scholar]
  35. Gidalevitz T, Stevens F, Argon Y. 2013. Orchestration of secretory protein folding by ER chaperones. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1833:112410–24 [Google Scholar]
  36. Gill S, Stevenson J, Kristiana I, Brown AJ. 2011. Cholesterol-dependent degradation of squalene monooxygenase, a control point in cholesterol synthesis beyond HMG-CoA reductase. Cell Metab 13:3260–73 [Google Scholar]
  37. Goldberg AL. 2003. Protein degradation and protection against misfolded or damaged proteins. Nature 426:6968895–99 [Google Scholar]
  38. Goldstein JL, Brown MS. 1973. Familial hypercholesterolemia: identification of a defect in the regulation of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase activity associated with overproduction of cholesterol. PNAS 70:102804–8 [Google Scholar]
  39. Goldstein JL, Brown MS. 2009. The LDL receptor. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 29:4431–38 [Google Scholar]
  40. Goldstein JL, Brown MS. 2015. A century of cholesterol and coronaries: from plaques to genes to statins. Cell 161:1161–72 [Google Scholar]
  41. Goldstein JL, DeBose-Boyd RA, Brown MS. 2006. Protein sensors for membrane sterols. Cell 124:135–46 [Google Scholar]
  42. Guerriero CJ, Brodsky JL. 2012. The delicate balance between secreted protein folding and endoplasmic reticulum–associated degradation in human physiology. Physiol. Rev. 92:2537–76 [Google Scholar]
  43. Hampton RY, Bhakta H. 1997. Ubiquitin-mediated regulation of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase. PNAS 94:2412944–48 [Google Scholar]
  44. Hampton RY, Gardner RG, Rine J. 1996. Role of 26S proteasome and HRD genes in the degradation of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase, an integral endoplasmic reticulum membrane protein. Mol. Biol. Cell 7:122029–44 [Google Scholar]
  45. Hampton RY, Garza RM. 2009. Protein quality control as a strategy for cellular regulation: lessons from ubiquitin-mediated regulation of the sterol pathway. Chem. Rev. 109:41561–74 [Google Scholar]
  46. Hampton RY, Rine J. 1994. Regulated degradation of HMG-CoA reductase, an integral membrane protein of the endoplasmic reticulum, in yeast. J. Cell Biol. 125:2299–312 [Google Scholar]
  47. Hausmann G, von Mering C, Basler K. 2009. The Hedgehog signaling pathway: Where did it come from?. PLOS Biol 7:6e1000146 [Google Scholar]
  48. Hirsch C, Gauss R, Horn SC, Neuber O, Sommer T. 2009. The ubiquitylation machinery of the endoplasmic reticulum. Nature 458:7237453–60 [Google Scholar]
  49. Horton JD, Goldstein JL, Brown MS. 2002. SREBPs: activators of the complete program of cholesterol and fatty acid synthesis in the liver. J. Clin. Investig. 109:91125–31 [Google Scholar]
  50. Howe V, Chua NK, Stevenson J, Brown AJ. 2015. The regulatory domain of squalene monooxygenase contains a re-entrant loop and senses cholesterol via a conformational change. J. Biol. Chem. 290:4627533–44 [Google Scholar]
  51. Hughes AL, Stewart EV, Espenshade PJ. 2008. Identification of twenty-three mutations in fission yeast Scap that constitutively activate SREBP. J. Lipid Res. 49:92001–12 [Google Scholar]
  52. Hughes AL, Todd BL, Espenshade PJ. 2005. SREBP pathway responds to sterols and functions as an oxygen sensor in fission yeast. Cell 120:6831–42 [Google Scholar]
  53. Hussain MM. 2014. Intestinal lipid absorption and lipoprotein formation. Curr. Opin. Lipidol. 25:3200–6 [Google Scholar]
  54. Hwang S, Hartman IZ, Calhoun LN, Garland K, Young GA. et al. 2016. Contribution of accelerated degradation to feedback regulation of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase and cholesterol metabolism in the liver. J. Biol. Chem. 291:2613479–94 [Google Scholar]
  55. Infante RE, Abi-Mosleh L, Radhakrishnan A, Dale JD, Brown MS, Goldstein JL. 2008a. Purified NPC1 protein. I. Binding of cholesterol and oxysterols to a 1278-amino acid membrane protein. J. Biol. Chem. 283:21052–63 [Google Scholar]
  56. Infante RE, Wang ML, Radhakrishnan A, Kwon HJ, Brown MS, Goldstein JL. 2008b. NPC2 facilitates bidirectional transfer of cholesterol between NPC1 and lipid bilayers, a step in cholesterol egress from lysosomes. PNAS 105:4015287–92 [Google Scholar]
  57. Jakulj L, van Dijk TH, de Boer JF, Kootte RS, Schonewille M. et al. 2016. Transintestinal cholesterol transport is active in mice and humans and controls ezetimibe-induced fecal neutral sterol excretion. Cell Metab 24:6783–94 [Google Scholar]
  58. Jiang W, Song B-L. 2014. Ubiquitin ligases in cholesterol metabolism. Diabetes Metab. J. 38:3171–80 [Google Scholar]
  59. Jo Y, DeBose-Boyd RA. 2010. Control of cholesterol synthesis through regulated ER-associated degradation of HMG CoA reductase. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 45:3185–98 [Google Scholar]
  60. Jo Y, Lee PCW, Sguigna PV, DeBose-Boyd RA. 2011. Sterol-induced degradation of HMG CoA reductase depends on interplay of two Insigs and two ubiquitin ligases, gp78 and Trc8. PNAS 108:5120503–8 [Google Scholar]
  61. Kelley RI, Hennekam RC. 2000. The Smith-Lemli-Opitz syndrome. J. Med. Genet 375321–35 [Google Scholar]
  62. Kim YE, Hipp MS, Bracher A, Hayer-Hartl M, Hartl FU. 2013. Molecular chaperone functions in protein folding and proteostasis. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 82:1323–55 [Google Scholar]
  63. Kleiger G, Mayor T. 2014. Perilous journey: a tour of the ubiquitin-proteasome system. Trends Cell Biol 24:6352–59 [Google Scholar]
  64. Koenig P-A, Ploegh HL. 2014. Protein quality control in the endoplasmic reticulum. F1000Prime Rep 6:49 [Google Scholar]
  65. Kuwabara PE, Labouesse M. 2002. The sterol-sensing domain: multiple families, a unique role?. Trends Genet 18:4193–201 [Google Scholar]
  66. Lai AC, Crews CM. 2016. Induced protein degradation: an emerging drug discovery paradigm. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 16:2101–14 [Google Scholar]
  67. Lange BM, Rujan T, Martin W, Croteau R. 2000. Isoprenoid biosynthesis: the evolution of two ancient and distinct pathways across genomes. PNAS 97:2413172–77 [Google Scholar]
  68. Lange Y, Ory DS, Ye J, Lanier MH, Hsu F-F, Steck TL. 2008. Effectors of rapid homeostatic responses of endoplasmic reticulum cholesterol and 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase. J. Biol. Chem. 283:31445–55 [Google Scholar]
  69. Lee JN, Song B, DeBose-Boyd RA, Ye J. 2006. Sterol-regulated degradation of Insig-1 mediated by the membrane-bound ubiquitin ligase gp78. J. Biol. Chem. 281:5139308–15 [Google Scholar]
  70. Lee JP, Brauweiler A, Rudolph M, Hooper JE, Drabkin HA, Gemmill RM. 2010. The TRC8 ubiquitin ligase is sterol regulated and interacts with lipid and protein biosynthetic pathways. Mol. Cancer Res. 8:193–106 [Google Scholar]
  71. Leidenheimer NJ, Ryder KG. 2014. Pharmacological chaperoning: a primer on mechanism and pharmacology. Pharmacol. Res. 83:10–19 [Google Scholar]
  72. Li X, Wang J, Coutavas E, Shi H, Hao Q, Blobel G. 2016. Structure of human Niemann-Pick C1 protein. PNAS 113:298212–17 [Google Scholar]
  73. Lloyd SJ-A, Raychaudhuri S, Espenshade PJ. 2013. Subunit architecture of the Golgi Dsc E3 ligase required for sterol regulatory element–binding protein (SREBP) cleavage in fission yeast. J. Biol. Chem. 288:2921043–54 [Google Scholar]
  74. Motamed M, Zhang Y, Wang ML, Seemann J, Kwon HJ. et al. 2011. Identification of luminal loop 1 of Scap protein as the sterol sensor that maintains cholesterol homeostasis. J. Biol. Chem. 286:2018002–12 [Google Scholar]
  75. Neal S, Mak R, Bennett EJ, Hampton R. 2017. A Cdc48 “retrochaperone” function is required for the solubility of retrotranslocated, integral membrane endoplasmic reticulum–associated degradation (ERAD-M) substrates. J. Biol. Chem. 292:3112–28 [Google Scholar]
  76. Needham PG, Brodsky JL. 2013. How early studies on secreted and membrane protein quality control gave rise to the ER associated degradation (ERAD) pathway: the early history of ERAD. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell Res. 1833:112447–57 [Google Scholar]
  77. Nguyen AD, Lee SH, DeBose-Boyd RA. 2009. Insig-mediated, sterol-accelerated degradation of the membrane domain of hamster 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase in insect cells. J. Biol. Chem. 284:3926778–88 [Google Scholar]
  78. Nohturfft A, Brown MS, Goldstein JL. 1998. Topology of SREBP cleavage-activating protein, a polytopic membrane protein with a sterol-sensing domain. J. Biol. Chem. 273:2717243–50 [Google Scholar]
  79. Nowaczyk MJM, Irons MB. 2012. Smith-Lemli-Opitz syndrome: phenotype, natural history, and epidemiology. Am. J. Med. Genet. C Semin. Med. Genet 160C4250–62 [Google Scholar]
  80. Ohgami N, Ko DC, Thomas M, Scott MP, Chang CCY, Chang T-Y. 2004. Binding between the Niemann-Pick C1 protein and a photoactivatable cholesterol analog requires a functional sterol-sensing domain. PNAS 101:3412473–78 [Google Scholar]
  81. Omkumar RV, Darnay BG, Rodwell VW. 1994. Modulation of Syrian hamster 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase activity by phosphorylation. Role of serine 871. J. Biol. Chem. 269:96810–14 [Google Scholar]
  82. Osborne TF, Espenshade PJ. 2009. Evolutionary conservation and adaptation in the mechanism that regulates SREBP action: What a long, strange tRIP it's been. Genes Dev 23:222578–91 [Google Scholar]
  83. Osborne TF, Rosenfeld JM. 1998. Related membrane domains in proteins of sterol sensing and cell signaling provide a glimpse of treasures still buried within the dynamic realm of intracellular metabolic regulation. Curr. Opin. Lipidol. 9:2137–40 [Google Scholar]
  84. Porter JR, Burg JS, Espenshade PJ, Iglesias PA. 2010. Ergosterol regulates sterol regulatory element binding protein (SREBP) cleavage in fission yeast. J. Biol. Chem. 285:5241051–61 [Google Scholar]
  85. Prabhu AV, Luu W, Sharpe LJ, Brown AJ. 2016. Cholesterol-mediated degradation of 7-dehydrocholesterol reductase switches the balance from cholesterol to vitamin D synthesis. J. Biol. Chem. 291:168363–73 [Google Scholar]
  86. Radhakrishnan A, Ikeda Y, Kwon HJ, Brown MS, Goldstein JL. 2007. Sterol-regulated transport of SREBPs from endoplasmic reticulum to Golgi: Oxysterols block transport by binding to Insig. PNAS 104:166511–18 [Google Scholar]
  87. Radhakrishnan A, Sun L-P, Kwon HJ, Brown MS, Goldstein JL. 2004. Direct binding of cholesterol to the purified membrane region of SCAP. Mol. Cell 15:2259–68 [Google Scholar]
  88. Ravid T, Doolman R, Avner R, Harats D, Roitelman J. 2000. The ubiquitin-proteasome pathway mediates the regulated degradation of mammalian 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase. J. Biol. Chem. 275:4635840–47 [Google Scholar]
  89. Raychaudhuri S, Young BP, Espenshade PJ, Loewen CJ. 2012. Regulation of lipid metabolism: a tale of two yeasts. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 24:4502–8 [Google Scholar]
  90. Ren R, Zhou X, He Y, Ke M, Wu J. et al. 2015. Crystal structure of a mycobacterial Insig homolog provides insight into how these sensors monitor sterol levels. Science 349:6244187–91 [Google Scholar]
  91. Roitelman J, Simoni RD. 1992. Distinct sterol and nonsterol signals for the regulated degradation of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA reductase. J. Biol. Chem. 267:3525264–73 [Google Scholar]
  92. Sato BK, Schulz D, Do PH, Hampton RY. 2009. Misfolded membrane proteins are specifically recognized by the transmembrane domain of the Hrd1p ubiquitin ligase. Mol. Cell 34:2212–22 [Google Scholar]
  93. Schneider WJ, Beisiegel U, Goldstein JL, Brown MS. 1982. Purification of the low density lipoprotein receptor, an acidic glycoprotein of 164,000 molecular weight. J. Biol. Chem. 257:52664–73 [Google Scholar]
  94. Schumacher MM, Elsabrouty R, Seemann J, Jo Y, DeBose-Boyd RA. 2015. The prenyltransferase UBIAD1 is the target of geranylgeraniol in degradation of HMG CoA reductase. eLife 4:e05560 [Google Scholar]
  95. Schumacher MM, Jun D-J, Jo Y, Seemann J, DeBose-Boyd RA. 2016. Geranylgeranyl-regulated transport of the prenyltransferase UBIAD1 between membranes of the ER and Golgi. J. Lipid Res. 57:71286–99 [Google Scholar]
  96. Sever N, Song B-L, Yabe D, Goldstein JL, Brown MS, DeBose-Boyd RA. 2003a. Insig-dependent ubiquitination and degradation of mammalian 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coA reductase stimulated by sterols and geranylgeraniol. J. Biol. Chem. 278:5252479–90 [Google Scholar]
  97. Sever N, Yang T, Brown MS, Goldstein JL, DeBose-Boyd RA. 2003b. Accelerated degradation of HMG CoA reductase mediated by binding of insig-1 to its sterol-sensing domain. Mol. Cell 11:125–33 [Google Scholar]
  98. Sharpe LJ, Cook ECL, Zelcer N, Brown AJ. 2014. The UPS and downs of cholesterol homeostasis. Trends Biochem. Sci. 39:11527–35 [Google Scholar]
  99. Shearer AG, Hampton RY. 2004. Structural control of endoplasmic reticulum–associated degradation: effect of chemical chaperones on 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coA reductase. J. Biol. Chem. 279:1188–96 [Google Scholar]
  100. Shearer AG, Hampton RY. 2005. Lipid-mediated, reversible misfolding of a sterol-sensing domain protein. EMBO J 24:1149–59 [Google Scholar]
  101. Song B-L, Javitt NB, DeBose-Boyd RA. 2005a. Insig-mediated degradation of HMG CoA reductase stimulated by lanosterol, an intermediate in the synthesis of cholesterol. Cell Metab 1:3179–89 [Google Scholar]
  102. Song B-L, Sever N, DeBose-Boyd RA. 2005b. Gp78, a membrane-anchored ubiquitin ligase, associates with Insig-1 and couples sterol-regulated ubiquitination to degradation of HMG CoA reductase. Mol. Cell 19:6829–40 [Google Scholar]
  103. Stewart EV, Lloyd SJ-A, Burg JS, Nwosu CC, Lintner RE. et al. 2012. Yeast sterol regulatory element-binding protein (SREBP) cleavage requires Cdc48 and Dsc5, a ubiquitin regulatory X domain–containing subunit of the Golgi Dsc E3 ligase. J. Biol. Chem. 287:1672–81 [Google Scholar]
  104. Stewart EV, Nwosu CC, Tong Z, Roguev A, Cummins TD. et al. 2011. Yeast SREBP cleavage activation requires the Golgi Dsc E3 ligase complex. Mol. Cell 42:2160–71 [Google Scholar]
  105. Stolz A, Besser S, Hottmann H, Wolf DH. 2013. Previously unknown role for the ubiquitin ligase Ubr1 in endoplasmic reticulum–associated protein degradation. PNAS 110:3815271–76 [Google Scholar]
  106. Theesfeld CL, Hampton RY. 2013. Insulin-induced gene protein (INSIG)-dependent sterol regulation of Hmg2 endoplasmic reticulum–associated degradation (ERAD) in yeast. J. Biol. Chem. 288:128519–30 [Google Scholar]
  107. Theesfeld CL, Pourmand D, Davis T, Garza RM, Hampton RY. 2011. The sterol-sensing domain (SSD) directly mediates signal-regulated endoplasmic reticulum–associated degradation (ERAD) of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl (HMG)-CoA reductase isozyme Hmg2. J. Biol. Chem. 286:3026298–307 [Google Scholar]
  108. Todd BL, Stewart EV, Burg JS, Hughes AL, Espenshade PJ. 2006. Sterol regulatory element binding protein is a principal regulator of anaerobic gene expression in fission yeast. Mol. Cell. Biol. 26:72817–31 [Google Scholar]
  109. Travers KJ, Patil CK, Wodicka L, Lockhart DJ, Weissman JS, Walter P. 2000. Functional and genomic analyses reveal an essential coordination between the unfolded protein response and ER-associated degradation. Cell 101:3249–58 [Google Scholar]
  110. Tsai YC, Leichner GS, Pearce MMP, Wilson GL, Wojcikiewicz RJH. et al. 2012. Differential regulation of HMG-CoA reductase and Insig-1 by enzymes of the ubiquitin-proteasome system. Mol. Biol. Cell. 23:234484–94 [Google Scholar]
  111. Vanier MT. 2015. Complex lipid trafficking in Niemann-Pick disease type C. J. Inherit. Metab. Dis. 38:1187–99 [Google Scholar]
  112. Vashist S, Ng DTW. 2004. Misfolded proteins are sorted by a sequential checkpoint mechanism of ER quality control. J. Cell Biol. 165:141–52 [Google Scholar]
  113. Vashistha N, Neal SE, Singh A, Carroll SM, Hampton RY. 2016. Direct and essential function for Hrd3 in ER-associated degradation. PNAS 113:215934–39 [Google Scholar]
  114. Vembar SS, Brodsky JL. 2008. One step at a time: endoplasmic reticulum–associated degradation. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 9:12944–57 [Google Scholar]
  115. Walter P, Ron D. 2011. The unfolded protein response: from stress pathway to homeostatic regulation. Science 334:60591081–86 [Google Scholar]
  116. Wang L-J, Song B-L. 2012. Niemann-Pick C1-like 1 and cholesterol uptake. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell Biol. Lipids 18217964–72 [Google Scholar]
  117. Wangeline MA, Hampton RY. 2017. Ligand-regulated entry into the HRD ERAD pathway: the dark side of allostery. bioRxiv 177311. https://doi.org/10.1101/177311 [Crossref]
  118. Wassif CA, Maslen C, Kachilele-Linjewile S, Lin D, Linck LM. et al. 1998. Mutations in the human sterol Δ7-reductase gene at 11q12–13 cause Smith-Lemli-Opitz syndrome. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 63:155–62 [Google Scholar]
  119. Wojcikiewicz RJ, Furuichi T, Nakade S, Mikoshiba K, Nahorski SR. 1994. Muscarinic receptor activation down-regulates the type I inositol 1,4,5-trisphosphate receptor by accelerating its degradation. J. Biol. Chem. 269:117963–69 [Google Scholar]
  120. Wojcikiewicz RJH, Pearce MMP, Sliter DA, Wang Y. 2009. When worlds collide: IP3 receptors and the ERAD pathway. Cell Calcium 46:3147–53 [Google Scholar]
  121. Yang T, Espenshade PJ, Wright ME, Yabe D, Gong Y. et al. 2002. Crucial step in cholesterol homeostasis: Sterols promote binding of SCAP to INSIG-1, a membrane protein that facilitates retention of SREBPs in ER. Cell 110:4489–500 [Google Scholar]
  122. Ye J, DeBose-Boyd RA. 2011. Regulation of cholesterol and fatty acid synthesis. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 3:7a004754 [Google Scholar]
  123. Zelcer N, Sharpe LJ, Loregger A, Kristiana I, Cook ECL. et al. 2014. The E3 ubiquitin ligase MARCH6 degrades squalene monooxygenase and affects 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl coenzyme A reductase and the cholesterol synthesis pathway. Mol. Cell. Biol. 34:71262–70 [Google Scholar]
  124. Zhang L, Reue K, Fong LG, Young SG, Tontonoz P. 2012. Feedback regulation of cholesterol uptake by the LXR-IDOL-LDLR axis. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 32:112541–46 [Google Scholar]
  125. Zhao Y, Ren J, Harlos K, Stuart DI, Lu G. et al. 2016. Structure of glycosylated NPC1 luminal domain C reveals insights into NPC2 and Ebola virus interactions. FEBS Lett 590:6605–12 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-cellbio-111315-125036
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-cellbio-111315-125036
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error