1932

Abstract

The sensory perception of texture is an important contributor of our general appreciation of foods. Food texture is mainly described in terms of mouthfeel and afterfeel attributes. The role of oral processing in the perception of texture and the role of microstructure therein have been reviewed regularly over recent years (Chen & Engelen 2012, Foegeding et al. 2011, Stieger & van de Velde 2013) and are not, therefore, addressed in this review. The scope of this review relates to the molecules that underlay the texture of foods. Protein, carbohydrate, and fat are the major structuring components in foods. In this review we focus on the physical interactions between proteins and polysaccharides that form the basis for the microstructure and texture of these foods. In general, food products are classified in four categories by their sensory and rheological properties: liquids, semisolids, soft solids, and hard solids (van Vliet et al. 2009). These four categories provide a useful classification framework, although they are not precisely defined by specific rheological properties. The current review focuses on semisolid and soft-solid foods.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-food-022814-015558
2015-04-10
2024-04-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/food/6/1/annurev-food-022814-015558.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-food-022814-015558&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Acero-Lopez A, Alexander M, Corredig M. 2010. Diffusing wave spectroscopy and rheological studies of rennet-induced gelation of skim milk in the presence of pectin and κ-carrageenan. Int. Dairy J. 20:328–35 [Google Scholar]
  2. Acero-Lopez A, Corredig M, Alexander M. 2009. Diffusing wave and ultrasonic spectroscopy of rennet-induced gelation of milk in the presence of high-methoxyl pectin. Food Biophys. 4:249–59 [Google Scholar]
  3. Alting AC, van der Meulen ET, Hugenholtz J, Visschers RW. 2004. Control of texture of cold-set gels through programmed bacterial acidification. Int. Dairy J. 14:323–29 [Google Scholar]
  4. Ayala-Hernandez I, Goff HD, Corredig M. 2008a. Interactions between milk proteins and exopolysaccharides produced by Lactococcus lactis observed by scanning electron microscopy. J. Dairy Sci. 91:2583–90 [Google Scholar]
  5. Ayala-Hernandez I, Hassan AN, Goff HD, Mira de Orduna R, Corredig M. 2008b. Production, isolation and characterization of exopolysaccharides produced by Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris JFR1 and their interaction with milk proteins: effect of pH and media composition. Int. Dairy J. 18:1109–18 [Google Scholar]
  6. Badel S, Bernardi T, Michaud P. 2011. New perspectives for Lactobacilli exopolysaccharides. Biotechnol. Adv. 29:54–66 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bergfeldt K, Piculell L, Linse P. 1996. Segregation and association in mixed polymer solutions from Flory-Huggins model calculations. J. Phys. Chem. 100:3680–87 [Google Scholar]
  8. Binder K, Stauffer D. 1974. Theory for slowing down of relaxation and spinodal decomposition of binary-mixtures. Phys. Rev. Lett. 33:1006–9 [Google Scholar]
  9. Bosnea LA, Moschakis T, Biliaderis CG. 2014. Complex coacervation as a novel microencapsulation technique to improve viability of probiotics under different stresses. Food Bioprocess Technol. 7:2767–81 [Google Scholar]
  10. Cahn JW, Hilliard JE. 1958. Free energy of a nonuniform system. I. Interfacial free energy. J. Chem. Phys. 28:258–67 [Google Scholar]
  11. Çakır E, Foegeding EA. 2011. Combining protein micro-phase separation and protein polysaccharide segregative phase separation to produce gel structures. Food Hydrocoll. 25:1538–46 [Google Scholar]
  12. Çakır E, Khan SA, Foegeding EA. 2012a. The effect of pH on gel structures produced using protein-polysaccharide phase separation and network inversion. Int. Dairy J. 27:99–102 [Google Scholar]
  13. Çakir E, Vinyard CJ, Essick G, Daubert CR, Drake MA, Foegeding EA. 2012b. Interrelations among physical characteristics, sensory perception and oral processing of protein-based soft-solid structures. Food Hydrocoll. 29:234–45 [Google Scholar]
  14. Capron I, Costeux S, Djabourov M. 2001. Water in water emulsions: phase separation and rheology of biopolymer solutions. Rheol. Acta 40:441–56 [Google Scholar]
  15. Chang Y-Y, Li D, Wang L-J, Bi C-H, Adhikari B. 2014. Effect of gums on the rheological characteristics and microstructure of acid-induced SPI-gum mixed gels. Carbohydr. Polym. 108:183–91 [Google Scholar]
  16. Chen J, Engelen L. 2012. Food Oral Processing—Fundamentals of Eating and Sensory Perception Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell
  17. Costa NE, Wang L, Auty ME, Hannon JA, McSweeney PLH, Beresford TP. 2012. Rheological, microscopic, and primary chemical characterization of the exopolysaccharide produced by Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris DPC6532. Dairy Sci. Technol. 92:219–35 [Google Scholar]
  18. Cui SW. 2005. Food Carbohydrates—Chemistry, Physical Properties, and Applications. London: CRC Press
  19. de Jong S, Klok HJ, van de Velde F. 2009. The mechanism behind microstructure formation in mixed whey protein-polysaccharide cold-set gels. Food Hydrocoll. 23:755–64 [Google Scholar]
  20. de Jong S, van de Velde F. 2007. Charge density of polysaccharides controls microstructure and large deformation properties of mixed gels. Food Hydrocoll. 21:1172–87 [Google Scholar]
  21. Dertli E, Colquhoun IJ, Gunning AP, Bongaerts RJ, Le Gall G. et al. 2013. Structure and biosynthesis of two exopolysaccharides produced by Lactobacillus johnsonii FI9785. J. Biol. Chem. 288:31938–51 [Google Scholar]
  22. De Vuyst L, Degeest B. 1999. Heteropolysaccharides from lactic acid bacteria. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 23:153–77 [Google Scholar]
  23. De Vuyst L, Zamfir M, Mozzi F, Adriany T, Marshall V. et al. 2003. Exopolysaccharide-producing Streptococcus thermophilus strain as functional starter cultures in the production of fermented milks. Int. Dairy J. 13:707–17 [Google Scholar]
  24. Dhont JKG. 1996. Spinodal decomposition of colloids in the initial and intermediate stages. J. Chem. Phys. 105:5112–25 [Google Scholar]
  25. Dhont JKG, Briels WJ. 2008. Gradient and vorticity banding. Rheol. Acta 47:257–81 [Google Scholar]
  26. Dickinson E. 2003. Hydrocolloids at interfaces and the influence on het properties of dispersed systems. Food Hydrocoll. 17:25–39 [Google Scholar]
  27. Faber EJ, Zoon P, Kamerling JP, Vliegenhart JFG. 1998. The exopolysaccharides produced by Streptococcus thermophilus Rs and Sts have the same repeating unit but differ in viscosity of their milk cultures. Carbohydr. Res. 310:269–76 [Google Scholar]
  28. Fang Z, Bhandari B. 2010. Encapsulation of polyphenols—a review. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 21:510–23 [Google Scholar]
  29. Foegeding EA, Daubert CR, Drake MA, Essick G, Trulsson M. et al. 2011. A comprehensive approach to understanding textural properties of semi- and soft-solid foods. J. Text. Stud. 42:103–29 [Google Scholar]
  30. Folkenberg DM, Dejmek P, Skriver A, Ipsen R. 2005. Relation between sensory texture properties and exopolysaccharide distribution in set and in stirred yoghurts produced with different starter cultures. J. Text. Stud. 36:174–89 [Google Scholar]
  31. Folkenberg DM, Dejmark P, Skriver A, Ipsen R. 2006. Interactions between EPS-producing Streptococcus thermophilus strains in mixed yoghurt cultures. J. Dairy Res. 73:385–93 [Google Scholar]
  32. Frith WJ. 2010. Mixed biopolymer aqueous solutions—phase behaviour and rheology. Adv. Coll. Interface Sci. 161:48–60 [Google Scholar]
  33. Gentés MC, St-Gelais D, Turgeon SL. 2011. Gel formation and rheological properties of fermented milk with in situ exopolysaccharide production by lactic acid bacteria. Dairy Sci. Technol. 91:645–61 [Google Scholar]
  34. Girard M, Schaffer-Lequart C. 2007a. Gelation and resistance to shearing of fermented milk: role of exopolysaccharides. Int. Dairy J. 17:666–73 [Google Scholar]
  35. Girard M, Schaffer-Lequart C. 2007b. Gelation of skim milk containing anionic exopolysaccharides and recovery of texture after shearing. Food Hydrocoll. 21:1031–40 [Google Scholar]
  36. Girard M, Schaffer-Lequart C. 2008. Attractive interactions between selected anionic exopolysaccharides and milk proteins. Food Hydrocoll. 22:1425–34 [Google Scholar]
  37. Grobben GJ, van Casteren WHM, Schols HA, Oosterveld A, Sala G, Smith MR. 1997. Analysis of exopolysaccharides produced by Lactobacillus delbruecki subsp. bulgaricus NCFB 2772 grown in continuous culture on glucose and fructose. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 48:516–21 [Google Scholar]
  38. Hassan AN, Corredig M, Frank JF. 2001. Viscoelastic properties of yogurt made with ropy and non-ropy exopolysaccharides producing cultures. Milchwissenschaft 21:656–62 [Google Scholar]
  39. Hassan AN, Frank JF, Farmer MA, Schmidt KA, Shalabi SI. 1995. Formation of yogurt microstructure and three-dimensional visualization as determined by confocal scanning laser microscopy. J. Dairy Sci. 78:2629–36 [Google Scholar]
  40. Hassan AN, Frank JF, Qvist KB. 2002. Direct observation of bacterial exopolysaccharides in dairy products using confocal scanning laser microscopy. J. Dairy Sci. 85:1705–8 [Google Scholar]
  41. Hassan AN, Ipsen R, Janzen T, Qvist KB. 2003. Microstructure and rheology of yogurt made with cultures differing only in their ability to produce exopolysaccharides. J. Dairy Sci. 86:1632–38 [Google Scholar]
  42. Hsu CC, Prausnitz JM. 1974. Thermodynamics of polymer compatibility in ternary systems. Macromolecules 7:320–24 [Google Scholar]
  43. Jolly L, Vincent SJF, Duboc P, Neeser JR. 2002. Exploiting polysaccharides from lactic acid bacteria. Antonie van Leeuwenhoek 82:367–74 [Google Scholar]
  44. Jones OG, McClements DJ. 2011. Recent progress in biopolymer nanoparticle and microparticle formation by heat-treating electrostatic protein-polysaccharide complexes. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 167:49–62 [Google Scholar]
  45. Kayitmazer AB, Seeman D, Minsky BB, Dubin PL, Xu YS. 2013. Protein-polyelectrolyte interactions. Soft Matter 9:2553–83 [Google Scholar]
  46. Kristo E, Miao Z, Corredig M. 2011. The role of exopolysaccharide produced by Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremoris in structure formation and recovery of acid milk gels. Int. Dairy J. 21:656–62 [Google Scholar]
  47. Lambert JM, Weinbreck F, Kleerebezem M. 2008. In vitro analysis of protection of the enzyme bile salt hydrolase against enteric conditions by whey protein-gum arabic microencapsulation. J. Agric. Food Chem. 56:8360–64 [Google Scholar]
  48. Laws AP, Leivers S, Chacon-Romero M, Chadha MJ. 2009. Variation in the molecular mass of exopolysaccharides during the time course of extended fermentations of skimmed milk by lactic acid bacteria. Int. Dairy J. 19:768–71 [Google Scholar]
  49. Laws AP, Marshall VM. 2001. The relevance of exopolysaccharides to the rheological properties in milk fermented with ropy strains of lactic acid bacteria. Int. Dairy J. 11:709–21 [Google Scholar]
  50. Looijesteijn PJ, van Casteren WHM, Tuinier R, Doeswijk-Voragen CHL, Hugenholtz J. 2000. Influence of different substrate limitations on the yield, composition and molecular mass of exopolysaccharides produced by Lactococcus lactis subspecies cremoris in continuous cultures. J. Appl. Microbiol. 89:116–22 [Google Scholar]
  51. McClements DJ, Decker EA, Park Y, Weiss J. 2009. Structural design principles for delivery of bioactive components in nutraceuticals and functional foods. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 49:577–606 [Google Scholar]
  52. Monteiro SR, Rebelo S, da Cruz e Silva OAB, Lopes-da-Silva JA. 2013. The influence of galactomannans with different amount of galactose side chains on the gelation of soy proteins at neutral pH. Food Hydrocoll. 33:349–60 [Google Scholar]
  53. Mozzi F, Rollan G, Savoy de Giori G, Font de Valdez G. 2001. Effect of galactose and glucose on the exopolysaccharide production and the activities of biosynthetic enzymes in Lactobacillus casei CRL 87. J. Appl. Microbiol. 91:160–67 [Google Scholar]
  54. Norton IT, Frith WJ. 2001. Microstructure design in mixed biopolymer composites. Food Hydrocoll. 15:543–53 [Google Scholar]
  55. Olmsted PD. 2008. Perspectives on shear banding in complex fluids. Rheol. Acta 47:283–300 [Google Scholar]
  56. Owen GJ, McClements DJ. 2011. Recent progress in biopolymer nanoparticle and microparticle formation by heat-treating electrostatic protein–polysaccharide complexes. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 167:49–62 [Google Scholar]
  57. Perrechil FA, Braga ALM, Cunha RL. 2013. Acid gelation of native and heat-denatured soy proteins and locust bean gum. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 48:620–27 [Google Scholar]
  58. Petry S, Furlan S, Waghorne E, Saulnier L, Cerning J, Maguin E. 2003. Comparison of the thickening properties of four Lactobacillus delbruecki subsp. bulgaricus strains and physicochemical characterization of their exopolysaccharides. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 221:285–91 [Google Scholar]
  59. Pham PL, Dupont I, Roy D, Lapointe G, Cerning J. 2000. Production of exopolysaccharide by Lactobacillus rhamnosus R and analysis of its enzymatic degradation during prolonged fermentation. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 66:2302–10 [Google Scholar]
  60. Ruas-Madiedo P, Hugenholtz J, Zoon P. 2002a. An overview of the functionality of exopolysaccharides produced by lactic acid bacteria. Int. Dairy J. 12:163–71 [Google Scholar]
  61. Ruas-Madiedo P, Tuinier R, Kanning M, Zoon P. 2002b. Role of exopolysaccharides produced by Lactococcus lactic subsp. cremoris on the viscosity of fermented milks. Int. Dairy J. 12:689–95 [Google Scholar]
  62. Sanchez C, Zuniga-Lopez R, Schmitt C, Despond S, Hardy J. 2000. Microstructure of acid-induced skim milk-locust bean gum-xanthan gels. Int. Dairy J. 10:199–212 [Google Scholar]
  63. Schmitt C, Sanchez C, Desobry-Banon S, Hardy J. 1998. Structure and technofunctional properties of protein-polysaccharide complexes: a review. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 38:689–753 [Google Scholar]
  64. Schmitt C, Turgeon SL. 2011. Protein-polysaccharide complexes and coacervates in food systems. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 167:63–70 [Google Scholar]
  65. Siggia ED. 1979. Late stages of spinodal decomposition in binary mixtures. Phys. Rev. A 20:595–605 [Google Scholar]
  66. Stieger M, van de Velde F. 2013. Microstructure, texture and oral processing: new ways to reduce sugar and salt in foods. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 18:334–48 [Google Scholar]
  67. Tanaka H, Araki T. 1997. Phase inversion during viscoelastic phase separation: roles of bulk and shear relaxation moduli. Phys. Rev. Lett. 78:4966–69 [Google Scholar]
  68. Tolstoguzov V. 2003. Some thermodynamic considerations in food formulation. Food Hydrocoll. 17:1–23 [Google Scholar]
  69. Tromp RH, De Hoog EHA. 2008. Band formation on shearing in phase-separated polymer solutions. Phys. Rev. E 77:031503 [Google Scholar]
  70. Tuinier R, de Kruif CG. 1999. Phase behavior of casein micelles/exocellular polysaccharide mixtures: experiment and theory. J. Chem. Phys. 110:9296–304 [Google Scholar]
  71. Tuinier R, ten Grotenhuis E, de Kruif CG. 2000. The effect of depolymerised guar gum on the stability of skim milk. Food Hydrocoll. 14:1–7 [Google Scholar]
  72. Tuinier R, van Casteren WH, Looijesteijn PJ, Schols HA, Voragen AG, Zoon P. 2001. Effects of structural modifications on some physical characteristics of exopolysaccharides from Lactococcus lactis. Biopolymers 59:160–66 [Google Scholar]
  73. Turgeon SL, Beaulieu M, Schmitt C, Sanchez C. 2003. Protein-polysaccharide interactions: phase-ordering kinetics, thermodynamic and structural aspects. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 8:401–14 [Google Scholar]
  74. van Aken GA, Vingerhoeds MH, de Wijk RA. 2011. Textural perception of liquid emulsions: role of oil content, oil viscosity and emulsion viscosity. Food Hydrocoll. 25:789–96 [Google Scholar]
  75. van den Berg L, Rosenberg Y, van Boekel MAJS, Rosenberg M, van de Velde F. 2009. Microstructural features of composite whey protein/polysaccharide gels characterized at different length scales. Food Hydrocoll. 23:1288–98 [Google Scholar]
  76. van den Berg L, van Vliet T, van der Linden E, van Boekel MAJS, van de Velde F. 2007. Breakdown properties and sensory perception of whey proteins/polysaccharide mixed gels as a function of microstructure. Food Hydrocoll. 21:961–76 [Google Scholar]
  77. van den Berg L, van Vliet T, van der Linden E, van Boekel MAJS, van de Velde F. 2008. Physical properties giving the sensory perception of whey proteins/polysaccharide gels. Food Biophys. 3:198–206 [Google Scholar]
  78. van der Goot AJ, Peighambardoust SH, Akkermans C, van Oosten-Manski JM. 2008. Creating novel structures in food materials: the role of well-defined shear flow. Food Biophys. 3:120–25 [Google Scholar]
  79. van Marle ME, Zoon P. 1995. Permeability and rheological properties of microbially and chemically acidified skim-milk gels. Neth. Milk Dairy J. 49:47–65 [Google Scholar]
  80. van Vliet T, van Aken GA, de Jongh HHJ, Hamer RJ. 2009. Colloidal aspects of texture perception. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 150:27–40 [Google Scholar]
  81. Vermant J, Solomon MJ. 2005. Flow-induced structure in colloidal suspensions. J. Phys. Condens. Matt. 17:R187–216 [Google Scholar]
  82. Vincent SJF, Faber EJ, Neeser J-R, Stingele F, Kamerling JP. 2001. Structure and properties of the exopolysaccharide produced by Streptococcus macedonius Sc136. Glycobiology 11:131–39 [Google Scholar]
  83. Vis M, Peters VFD, Tromp RH, Erné BH. 2014. Donnan potentials in aqueous phase-separated polymer mixtures. Langmuir 30:5755–62 [Google Scholar]
  84. Walkenström P, Nielsen M, Windhab E, Hermansson AM. 1999. Effects of flow behaviour on the aggregation of whey protein suspensions, pure or mixed with xanthan. J. Food Eng. 42:15–26 [Google Scholar]
  85. Walther B, Walkenström P, Hermansson AM, Fischer P, Windhab EJ. 2002. Flow processing and gel formation—a promising combination for the design of the shape of gelatin drops. Food Hydrocoll. 16:633–43 [Google Scholar]
  86. Wang F, Liu X, Hu Y, Luo J, Lv X. et al. 2014. Effect of carrageenan on the formation of rennet-induced casein micelle gels. Food Hydrocoll. 36:212–19 [Google Scholar]
  87. Wassén S, Lorén N, van Bemmel K, Schuster E, Rondeau E, Hermansson A-M. 2013. Effects of confinement on phase separation kinetics and final morphology on whey protein isolate-gellan gum mixtures. Soft Matter 9:2738–49 [Google Scholar]
  88. Weinbreck F, de Vries R, Schrooyen P, de Kruif CG. 2003. Complex coacervation of whey proteins and gum arabic. Biomacromolecules 4:293–303 [Google Scholar]
  89. Weinbreck F, Minor M, de Kruif CG. 2004a. Microencapsulation of oils using whey protein/gum arabic coacervates. J. Microencapsulation 21:667–79 [Google Scholar]
  90. Weinbreck F, Tromp RH, de Kruif CG. 2004b. Composition and structure of whey protein/gum arabic coacervates. Biomacromolecules 5:1437–45 [Google Scholar]
  91. Wolf B, Scirocco R, Frith WJ, Norton IT. 2000. Shear-induced anisotropic microstructure in phase-separated biopolymer mixtures. Food Hydrocoll. 14:217–25 [Google Scholar]
  92. Xiao Z, Liu W, Zhu G, Zhou R, Niu Y. 2014. A review of the preparation and application of flavour and essential oils microcapsules based on complex coacervation technology. J. Sci. Food Agric. 94:1482–94 [Google Scholar]
  93. Xu D, Yuan F, Gao Y, Panya A, McClements DJ, Decker EA. 2014. Influence of whey protein-beet pectin conjugate on het properties and digestibility of beta-carotene emulsion during in vitro digestion. Food Chem. 156:374–79 [Google Scholar]
  94. Ye A. 2008. Complexation between milk proteins and polysaccharides via electrostatic interaction: principles and applications—a review. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 43:406–15 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-food-022814-015558
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-food-022814-015558
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error