1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Food Science and Technology
  4. Volume 15, 2024
  5. Article

Annual Review of Food Science and Technology

Volume 15, 2024

Next-Generation Plant-Based Foods: Challenges and Opportunities

Abstract

Owing to environmental, ethical, health, and safety concerns, there has been considerable interest in replacing traditional animal-sourced foods like meat, seafood, egg, and dairy products with next-generation plant-based analogs that accurately mimic their properties. Numerous plant-based foods have already been successfully introduced to the market, but there are still several challenges that must be overcome before they are adopted by more consumers. In this article, we review the current status of the science behind the development of next-generation plant-based foods and highlight areas where further research is needed to improve their quality, increase their variety, and reduce their cost, including improving ingredient performance, developing innovative processing methods, establishing structure–function relationships, and improving nutritional profiles.

Keyword(s): nutraceuticals, nutrition, plant proteins, plant-based foods, soft-matter physics
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-food-072023-034414
2024-06-28
2024-12-02
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/food/15/1/annurev-food-072023-034414.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-food-072023-034414&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Alcorta A, Porta A, Tarrega A, Alvarez MD, Vaquero MP. 2021.. Foods for plant-based diets: challenges and innovations. . Foods 10:(2):293
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  2. Aschemann-Witzel J, Gantriis RF, Fraga P, Perez-Cueto FJA. 2021.. Plant-based food and protein trend from a business perspective: markets, consumers, and the challenges and opportunities in the future. . Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 61::3119–28
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  3. Boukid F, Gagaoua M. 2022.. Vegan egg: a future-proof food ingredient?. Foods 11:(2):161
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  4. Briggs MA, Petersen KS, Kris-Etherton PM. 2017.. Saturated fatty acids and cardiovascular disease: replacements for saturated fat to reduce cardiovascular risk. . Healthcare 5:(2):29
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  5. Burger TG, Singh I, Mayfield C, Baumert JL, Zhang Y. 2022.. The impact of spray drying conditions on the physicochemical and emulsification properties of pea protein isolate. . LWT Food Sci. Technol. 153::112495
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chen Q, Zhang J, Zhang Y, Kaplan DL, Wang Q. 2022.. Protein-amylose/amylopectin molecular interactions during high-moisture extruded texturization toward plant-based meat substitutes applications. . Food Hydrocoll. 127::107559
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  7. Chen Y, Zhang M, Bhandari B. 2021.. 3D printing of steak-like foods based on textured soybean protein. . Foods 10::2011
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cholewski M, Tomczykowa M, Tomczyk M. 2018.. A comprehensive review of chemistry, sources and bioavailability of omega-3 fatty acids. . Nutrients 10:(11):1662
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  9. Cornet SHV, Snel SJE, Schreuders FKG, van der Sman RGM, Beyrer M, van der Goot AJ. 2022.. Thermo-mechanical processing of plant proteins using shear cell and high-moisture extrusion cooking. . Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 62::3264–80
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  10. Craig WJ, Mangels AR, Brothers CJ. 2022.. Nutritional profiles of non-dairy plant-based cheese alternatives. . Nutrients 14:(6):1247
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  11. Curtain F, Grafenauer S. 2019.. Plant-based meat substitutes in the flexitarian age: an audit of products on supermarket shelves. . Nutrients 11:(11):2603
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  12. Farsi DN, Uthumange D, Munoz JM, Commane DM. 2022.. The nutritional impact of replacing dietary meat with meat alternatives in the UK: a modelling analysis using nationally representative data. . Br. J. Nutr. 127::1731–41
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  13. Galves C, Galli G, Kurozawa L. 2023.. Potato protein: current review of structure, technological properties, and potential application on spray drying microencapsulation. . Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 63:(23):6564–79
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  14. Geada P, Moreira C, Silva M, Nunes R, Madureira L, et al. 2021.. Algal proteins: production strategies and nutritional and functional properties. . Bioresour. Technol. 332::125125
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  15. GFI. 2020.. Plant-based meat for a growing world. Fact Sheet, Good Food Inst., Washington, DC:. https://gfi.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/GFI-Plant-Based-Meat-Fact-Sheet_Environmental-Comparison.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  16. GFI. 2021.. State of the industry report: plant-based meat, eggs, and dairy. Rep. , Good Food Inst., Washington, DC:.
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Glidden CK, Nova N, Kain MP, Lagerstrom KM, Skinner EB, et al. 2021.. Human-mediated impacts on biodiversity and the consequences for zoonotic disease spillover. . Curr. Biol. 31::R1342–61
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  18. Gorissen SHM, Crombag JJR, Senden JMG, Waterval WAH, Bierau J, et al. 2018.. Protein content and amino acid composition of commercially available plant-based protein isolates. . Amino Acids 50::1685–95
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  19. Grasso N, Lynch NL, Arendt EK, O'Mahony JA. 2022.. Chickpea protein ingredients: a review of composition, functionality, and applications. . Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 21::435–52
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  20. Grossmann L, Kinchla AJ, Nolden A, McClements DJ. 2021.. Standardized methods for testing the quality attributes of plant-based foods: milk and cream alternatives. . Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 20::2206–33
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  21. Grossmann L, Weiss J. 2021.. Alternative protein sources as technofunctional food ingredients. . Annu. Rev. Food Sci. Technol. 12::93–117
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  22. Han F, Han FL, Wang Y, Fan LP, Song G, et al. 2019.. Digestible indispensable amino acid scores of nine cooked cereal grains. . Br. J. Nutr. 121::30–41
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  23. Hayek MN, Harwatt H, Ripple WJ, Mueller ND. 2021.. The carbon opportunity cost of animal-sourced food production on land. . Nat. Sustain. 4::21–24
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  24. Hirahatake KM, Astrup A, Hill JO, Slavin JL, Allison DB, Maki KC. 2020.. Potential cardiometabolic health benefits of full-fat dairy: the evidence base. . Adv. Nutr. 11::533–47
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  25. Irfan M, Almotiri A, AlZeyadi ZA. 2022.. Antimicrobial resistance and its drivers: a review. . Antibiotics 11:(10):1362
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  26. Jarpa-Parra M. 2018.. Lentil protein: a review of functional properties and food application. An overview of lentil protein functionality. . Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 53::892–903
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  27. Jia W, Sutanto IR, Ndiaye M, Keppler JK, van der Goot AJ. 2022.. Effect of aqueous ethanol washing on functional properties of sunflower materials for meat analogue application. . Food Struct. 33::100274
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  28. Jimenez-Munoz L, Nielsen MT, Roman L, Corredig M. 2023.. Variation of in vitro digestibility of pea protein powder dispersions from commercially available sources. . Food Chem. 401::134178
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  29. Jimenez-Munoz L, Tsochatzis ED, Corredig M. 2022.. Impact of the structural modifications of potato protein in the digestibility process under semi-dynamic simulated human gastrointestinal in vitro system. . Nutrients 14:(12):2505
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  30. Kendler C, Duchardt A, Karbstein HP, Emin MA. 2021.. Effect of oil content and oil addition point on the extrusion processing of wheat gluten-based meat analogues. . Foods 10::697
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  31. Key TJ, Papier K, Tong TYN. 2022.. Plant-based diets and long-term health: findings from the EPIC-Oxford study. . Proc. Nutr. Soc. 81::190–98
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  32. Khazaei H, Subedi M, Nickerson M, Martinez-Villaluenga C, Frias J, Vandenberg A. 2019.. Seed protein of lentils: current status, progress, and food applications. . Foods 8:(9):391
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  33. Kuo E, McClements DJ. 2022.. Food colloid-based delivery systems for tackling age-related macular degeneration by enhancing carotenoid bioavailability: a review. . Food Hydrocoll. Health 2::100093
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  34. Kyriakopoulou K, Dekkers B, van der Goot AJ. 2019.. Plant-based meat analogues. . In Sustainable Meat Production and Processing, ed. CM Galanakis , pp. 103–26. Cambridge, MA:: Acad. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Kyriakopoulou K, Keppler JK, van der Goot AJ. 2021.. Functionality of ingredients and additives in plant-based meat analogues. . Foods 10:(3):600
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  36. Lee HW, Lu YY, Zhang YY, Fu CL, Huang DJ. 2021.. Physicochemical and functional properties of red lentil protein isolates from three origins at different pH. . Food Chem. 358::129749
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  37. Lu Z, Liu Y, Lee YEJ, Chan A, Lee PR, Yang HS. 2023.. Effect of starch addition on the physicochemical properties, molecular interactions, structures, and in vitro digestibility of the plant-based egg analogues. . Food Chem. 403::134390
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  38. Mandliya S, Pratap-Singh A, Vishwakarma S, Dalbhagat CG, Mishra HN. 2022.. Incorporation of mycelium (Pleurotus eryngii) in pea protein based low moisture meat analogue: effect on its physicochemical, rehydration and structural properties. . Foods 11::2476
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  39. Marikkar JMN, Yanty NAM, Musthafa S, Miskandhar MS. 2022.. Recent advances in plant-based fat formulation as substitute for lard. . Grasas Aceites 73:(2):e463
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  40. Marinangeli CPF, Fabek H, Ahmed M, Sanchez-Hernandez D, Foisy S, House JD. 2021.. The effect of increasing intakes of plant protein on the protein quality of Canadian diets. . Appl. Physiol. Nutr. Metab. 46::771–80
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  41. McClements DJ. 2002a.. Colloidal basis of emulsion color. . Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 7::451–55
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  42. McClements DJ. 2002b.. Theoretical prediction of emulsion color. . Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 97::63–89
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  43. McClements DJ. 2015.. Food Emulsions: Principles, Practice, and Techniques. Baco Raton, FL:: CRC Press
     [Google Scholar]
  44. McClements DJ. 2020.. Development of next-generation nutritionally fortified plant-based milk substitutes: structural design principles. . Foods 9:(4):421
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  45. McClements DJ, Grossmann L. 2021.. The science of plant-based foods: constructing next-generation meat, fish, milk, and egg analogs. . Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 20::4049–100
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  46. McClements DJ, Grossmann L. 2022a.. Meat and fish alternatives. . In Next-Generation Plant-Based Foods: Design, Production, and Properties, ed. DJ McClements, L Grossmann , pp. 285–339. Cham, Switz.:: Springer
     [Google Scholar]
  47. McClements DJ, Grossmann L. 2022b.. Next-Generation Plant-Based Foods: Design, Production, and Properties. Cham, Switz.:: Springer
     [Google Scholar]
  48. McClements DJ, Lu JK, Grossmann L. 2022.. Proposed methods for testing and comparing the emulsifying properties of proteins from animal, plant, and alternative sources. . Colloids Interfaces 6:(2):19
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  49. McClements DJ, Newman E, McClements IF. 2019.. Plant-based milks: a review of the science underpinning their design, fabrication, and performance. . Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 18::2047–67
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  50. Miao M, Hamaker BR. 2021.. Food matrix effects for modulating starch bioavailability. . Annu. Rev. Food Sci. Technol. 12::169–91
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  51. Mohamad Mazlan M, Talib RA, Chin NL, Shukri R, Taip FS, et al. 2020.. Physical and microstructure properties of oyster mushroom-soy protein meat analog via single-screw extrusion. . Foods 9::1023
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  52. Nasrollahzadeh F, Roman L, Skov K, Jakobsen LMA, Trinh BM, et al. 2023.. A comparative investigation of seed storage protein fractions: the synergistic impact of molecular properties and composition on anisotropic structuring. . Food Hydrocoll. 137::108400
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  53. Nieuwland M, Geerdink P, Engelen-Smit NPE, van der Meer IM, America AHP, et al. 2021.. Isolation and gelling properties of duckweed protein concentrate. . ACS Food Sci. Technol. 1::908–16
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  54. Pedrazzini E, Mainieri D, Marrano CA, Vitale A. 2016.. Where do protein bodies of cereal seeds come from?. Front. Plant Sci. 7::1139
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  55. Pham T, Knowles S, Bermingham E, Brown J, Hannaford R, et al. 2022.. Plasma amino acid appearance and status of appetite following a single meal of red meat or a plant-based meat analog: a randomized crossover clinical trial. . Curr. Dev. Nutr. 6:(5):nzac082
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  56. Poore J, Nemecek T. 2018.. Reducing food's environmental impacts through producers and consumers. . Science 360::987–92
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  57. Reynaud Y, Buffiere C, Cohade B, Vauris M, Liebermann K, et al. 2021.. True ileal amino acid digestibility and digestible indispensable amino acid scores (DIAASs) of plant-based protein foods. . Food Chem. 338::128020
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  58. Royall CP, Faers MA, Fussell SL, Hallett JE. 2021.. Real space analysis of colloidal gels: triumphs, challenges and future directions. . J. Phys. Condens. Matter 33::453002
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  59. Sadhukhan J, Dugmore TIJ, Matharu A, Martinez-Hernandez E, Aburto J, et al. 2020.. Perspectives on “game changer” global challenges for sustainable 21st century: plant-based diet, unavoidable food waste biorefining, and circular economy. . Sustainability 12:(5):1976
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  60. Schlangen M, Ribberink MA, Taghian Dinani S, Sagis LMC, van der Goot AJ. 2023.. Mechanical and rheological effects of transglutaminase treatment on dense plant protein blends. . Food Hydrocoll. 136::108261
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  61. Schmitt C, Bovetto L, Buczkowski J, Reis GD, Pibarot P, et al. 2021.. Plant proteins and their colloidal state. . Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 56::101510
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  62. Sharan S, Zotzel J, Stadtmuller J, Bonerz D, Aschoff J, et al. 2022.. Effect of industrial process conditions of fava bean (Vicia faba L.) concentrates on physico-chemical and functional properties. . Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 81::103142
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  63. Shi D, Nickerson MT. 2022.. Comparative evaluation of the functionality of faba bean protein isolates with major legume proteins in the market. . Cereal Chem. 99::1246–60
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  64. Shori AB, Al Zahrani AJ. 2022.. Non-dairy plant-based milk products as alternatives to conventional dairy products for delivering probiotics. . Food Sci. Technol. 42::e101321
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  65. Snel SJE, Bellwald Y, van der Goot AJ, Beyrer M. 2022.. Novel rotating die coupled to a twin-screw extruder as a new route to produce meat analogues with soy, pea and gluten. . Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 81::103152
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  66. Sridhar K, Bouhallab S, Croguennec T, Renard D, Lechevalier V. 2023.. Recent trends in design of healthier plant-based alternatives: nutritional profile, gastrointestinal digestion, and consumer perception. . Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 63::1048398
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  67. Stanley D, Batacan R, Bajagai YS. 2022.. Rapid growth of antimicrobial resistance: the role of agriculture in the problem and the solutions. . Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 106::6953–62
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  68. Taghian Dinani S, Allaire N, Boom R, van der Goot AJ. 2023a.. Influence of processing temperature on quality attributes of meat analogues fortified with l-cysteine. . Food Hydrocoll. 137::108422
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  69. Taghian Dinani S, Broekema NL, Boom R, van der Goot AJ. 2023b.. Investigation potential of hydrocolloids in meat analogue preparation. . Food Hydrocoll. 135::108199
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  70. Taghian Dinani S, van der Harst JP, Boom R, van der Goot AJ. 2023c.. Effect of l-cysteine and l-ascorbic acid addition on properties of meat analogues. . Food Hydrocoll. 134::108059
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  71. Tan C, McClements DJ. 2021.. Application of advanced emulsion technology in the food industry: a review and critical evaluation. . Foods 10:(4):812
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  72. Tan YB, Lee PW, Martens TD, McClements DJ. 2022.. Comparison of emulsifying properties of plant and animal proteins in oil-in-water emulsions: whey, soy, and RuBisCo proteins. . Food Biophys. 17::409–21
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  73. Tan YB, McClements DJ. 2021.. Plant-based colloidal delivery systems for bioactives. . Molecules 26:(22):6895
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  74. Tonsor GT, Lusk JL. 2022.. US perspective: meat demand outdoes meat avoidance. . Meat Sci. 190::108843
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  75. Tso R, Forde CG. 2021.. Unintended consequences: nutritional impact and potential pitfalls of switching from animal- to plant-based foods. . Nutrients 13::2527
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  76. van Vliet S, Bain JR, Muehlbauer MJ, Provenza FD, Kronberg SL, et al. 2021.. A metabolomics comparison of plant-based meat and grass-fed meat indicates large nutritional differences despite comparable nutrition facts panels. . Sci. Rep. 11::13828
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  77. Vu G, Xiang XK, Zhou HL, McClements DJ. 2023.. Lutein-fortified plant-based egg analogs designed to improve eye health: formation, characterization, in vitro digestion, and bioaccessibility. . Foods 12:(1):2
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  78. Wang H, Zhang L, Czaja TP, Bakalis S, Zhang W, Lametsch R. 2022.. Structural characteristics of high-moisture extrudates with oil-in-water emulsions. . Food Res. Int. 158::111554
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  79. Wannasin D, McClements DJ. 2022.. Optimizing the appearance of plant-based foods: impact of pigment and droplet characteristics on optical properties of model oil-in-water emulsions. . Food Biophys. 18::289–301
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  80. Weathers ST, Caviola L, Scherer L, Pfister S, Fischer B, et al. 2020.. Quantifying the valuation of animal welfare among Americans. . J. Agric. Environ. Ethics 33::261–82
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  81. Wehrmaker AM, Zenker HE, de Groot W, Sanders M, van der Goot AJ, et al. 2022.. Amino acid modifications during the production (shearing, sterilization) of plant-based meat analogues: an explorative study using pet food production as an example. . ACS Food Sci. Technol. 2::1753–65
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  82. Wen Y, Che QT, Kim HW, Park HJ. 2021.. Potato starch altered the rheological, printing, and melting properties of 3D-printable fat analogs based on inulin emulsion-filled gels. . Carbohydr. Polym. 269::118285
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  83. Willett W, Rockstrom J, Loken B, Springmann M, Lang T, et al. 2019.. Food in the Anthropocene: the EAT-Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems. . Lancet 393::447–92
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  84. Wittek P, Ellwanger F, Karbstein HP, Emin MA. 2021.. Morphology development and flow characteristics during high moisture extrusion of a plant-based meat analogue. . Foods 10::1753
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  85. Xia S, Xue Y, Xue C, Jiang X, Li J. 2022.. Structural and rheological properties of meat analogues from Haematococcus pluvialis residue-pea protein by high moisture extrusion. . LWT 154::112756
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  86. Xie YT, Cai LL, Huang ZJ, Shan K, Xu XL, et al. 2022a.. Plant-based meat analogues weaken gastrointestinal digestive function and show less digestibility than real meat in mice. . J. Agric. Food Chem. 70:(39):12442–55
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  87. Xie YT, Cai LL, Zhao D, Liu H, Xu XL, et al. 2022b.. Real meat and plant-based meat analogues have different in vitro protein digestibility properties. . Food Chem. 387::132917
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  88. Xing ZQ, Li JY, Zhang YT, Gao A, Xie HR, et al. 2022.. Peptidomics comparison of plant-based meat alternatives and processed meat after in vitro digestion. . Food Res. Int. 158::111462
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  89. Yuan MJ, Singer MR, Pickering RT, Moore LL. 2022.. Saturated fat from dairy sources is associated with lower cardiometabolic risk in the Framingham Offspring Study. . Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 116:(6):1682–92
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  90. Zhang YQ, Sharan S, Rinnan A, Orlien V. 2021.. Survey on methods for investigating protein functionality and related molecular characteristics. . Foods 10:(11):2848
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  91. Zhang ZY, Kobata K, Pham H, Kos D, Tan YB, et al. 2022.. Production of plant-based seafood: scallop analogs formed by enzymatic gelation of pea protein-pectin mixtures. . Foods 11:(6):851
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  92. Zhou H, Vu G, McClements DJ. 2022.. Formulation and characterization of plant-based egg white analogs using RuBisCO protein. . Food Chem. 397::133808
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  93. Zhou HL, Hu YY, Tan YB, Zhang ZY, McClements DJ. 2021a.. Digestibility and gastrointestinal fate of meat versus plant-based meat analogs: an in vitro comparison. . Food Chem. 364::130439
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  94. Zhou HL, Zheng BJ, Zhang ZY, Zhang RJ, He LL, McClements DJ. 2021b.. Fortification of plant-based milk with calcium may reduce vitamin D bioaccessibility: an in vitro digestion study. . J. Agric. Food Chem. 69::4223–33
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-food-072023-034414
Loading
Next-Generation Plant-Based Foods: Challenges and Opportunities
Annual Review of Food Science and Technology 15, 79 (2024); https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-food-072023-034414
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-food-072023-034414
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-food-072023-034414
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error