1932

Abstract

International law seeks to ensure water security and to prevent or resolve conflicts leading to water insecurity. This relationship is based on a hybrid framework comprising binding and nonbinding instruments. The multi-scalar dimensions of water (in)security are recognized, but further engagement is required. The link between international law and water (in)security is considered primarily through the lens of international water law, which focuses on transboundary (surface) watercourses. Groundwater—the other main source of water and determinant of water (in)security—receives little attention. Further, the traditional state-centric approach, with its emphasis on sovereignty and cooperation, remains the dominant paradigm despite some attempts to redefine it. Several other branches of international law present opportunities for expanding international law's engagement with the water security discourse. Finally, the climate change challenge requires a reconsideration of international law's approach to water (in)security while considering the global dimensions of water.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-010421-014915
2021-10-13
2024-04-17
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/lawsocsci/17/1/annurev-lawsocsci-010421-014915.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-010421-014915&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Albrecht TR, Varady RG, Zuniga-Teran AA, Gerlak AK, Staddon C. 2017. Governing a shared hidden resource: a review of governance mechanisms for transboundary groundwater security. Water Secur 2:43–56
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Allouche J, Middleton C, Gyawali D. 2019. The WaterFoodEnergy NexusPower, Politics, and Justice London: Routledge
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Allouche J, Nicol A, Mehta L. 2011. Water security: towards the human securitization of water. Whitehead J. Dipl. Int. Relat. 12:153–71
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Appelgren B, Klohn W. 1997. Management of transboundary water resources for water security; principles, approaches and State practice. Nat. Resour. Forum 21:291–100
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Argentina v Uruguay (Case Concerning Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay) 2010 I.C.J. 14
  6. Belinskij A. 2015. Water-energy-food nexus within the framework of international water law. Water 7:5396–415
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Boute A. 2016. The water-energy-climate nexus under international law: a Central Asian perspective. Mich. J. Environ. Adm. Law 5:2371–434
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Brunnée J, Toope SJ. 1994. Environmental security and freshwater resources: a case of international ecosystems law. Yearb. Int. Environ. Law 5:41–76
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Brunnée J, Toope SJ. 1997. Environmental security and freshwater resources: ecosystem regime building. Am. J. Int. Law 91:126–59
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Cook C, Bakker K. 2012. Water security: debating an emerging paradigm. Glob. Environ. Change 22:194–102
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Cullet P, Bhullar L, Koonan S. 2015. Inter-sectoral water allocation and conflicts: perspectives from Rajasthan. Econ. Political Wkly. 50:3461–69
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Daoudy M. 2008. Hydro-hegemony and international water law: laying claims to water right. Water Policy 10:289–102
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Eckstein G. 2009. Water scarcity, conflict, and security in a climate change world: challenges and opportunities for international law and policy. Wis. Int. Law J. 27:409–61
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Gerlak AK, Mukhtarov F. 2015.. “ Ways of knowing” water: integrated water resources management and water security as complementary discourses. Int. Environ. Agreem. 15:257–72
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Gleick PH. 1993. Water and conflict: fresh water resources and international security. Int. Secur. 18:179–112
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Gleick PH. 2019. Water as a weapon and casualty of armed conflict: a review of recent water-related violence in Iraq, Syria, and Yemen. WIREs Water 6:4e1351
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Grey D, Garrick D 2013. Water security, perceptions and politics: the context for international watercourse negotiations. International Law and Freshwater: The Multiple Challenges LB de Chazournes, C Leb, M Tignino 37–47 Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Grobicki A 2016. Water-food-energy-climate: strengthening the weak links in the nexus. The Water, Food, Energy and Climate Nexus: Challenges and an Agenda for Action F Dodds, J Bartram 127–37 Abingdon, UK: Routledge
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Honkonen T. 2017. Water security and climate change: the need for adaptive governance. Potchefstroom Electron. Law J 20:1 https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2016/v19i0a1651
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  20. Hulme K. 2009. Environmental security: implications for international law. Yearb. Int. Environ. Law 19:13–26
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Int. Law Comm 2008. Draft articles on the law of transboundary aquifers. Off. Rec. Gen. Assem 63rd Sess., Suppl. 10, U.N. Doc. A/63/10
  22. Iyer RR. 1999. Conflict resolution: three river treaties. Econ. Political Wkly. 34:241509–18
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Jepson W, Wutich A, Harris LM 2020. Water-security capabilities and the human right to water. Water Politics: Governance, Justice and the Right to Water F Sultana, A Loftus 84–98 Abingdon, UK: Routledge
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Johnson H. 2018. International Agricultural Law and Policy: A Rights-Based Approach to Food Security Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar
  25. Keulertz M, Sowers J, Woertz E, Mohtar R 2018. The water-energy-food nexus in arid regions—the politics of problemsheds. Oxford Handbook of Water Politics and Policy K Conca, E Weinthal 167–96 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Koubi V, Spilker G, Böhmelt T, Bernauer T. 2013. Do natural resources matter for interstate and intrastate armed conflict?. J. Peace Res. 51:2227–43
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Kpenou S 2018. Fresh water as common heritage and a common concern of mankind. Research Handbook on Freshwater Law and International Relations M Tignino, C Bréthaut 2–30 Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Kuokkanen T. 2017. Water security and international law. Potchefstroom Electron. Law J. 20:1 https://doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2017/v20i0a1652
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  29. Larson RB. 2017. Water security. Northwest. Univ. Law Rev. 112:2139–200
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Larson RB. 2020. Just Add Water: Solving the World's Problems Using Its Most Precious Resource Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  31. Leb C, Wouters P 2013. The water security paradox and international law: securitization as an obstacle to achieving water security and the role of law in desecuritizing the world's most precious resource. Water Security: Principles, Perspectives and Practices B Lankford, K Bakker, M Zeitoun, D Conway 26–46 Abingdon, UK: Routledge
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Lê Phan H, Winkler IT 2016. Water security. Research Handbook on Disasters and International Law SC Breau, KLH Samuel 295–318 Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Maduekwe NC, Young C-L 2018. The impact of the water-energy nexus in realizing sustainable access to water and energy. Ending Africa's Energy Deficit and the Law: Achieving Sustainable Energy for All in Africa Y Omorogbe, A Ordor 261–85 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Magsig B-O. 2009. Introducing an analytical framework for water security: a platform for the refinement of international water law. J. Water Law 20:2–361–69
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Magsig B-O. 2011. Overcoming state-centrism in international water law: “regional common concern” as the normative foundation of water security. Göttingen J. Int. Law 3:1317–44
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Magsig B-O. 2012. Rising to the challenge of water security: international (water) law in need of refinement. Int. J. Sustain. Soc 4:1–228–44
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Magsig B-O. 2013. Water insecurity: a change agent for international water law reform. Glob. Dialogue 15:234–41
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Magsig B-O. 2015. International Water Law and the Quest for Common Security Abingdon, UK: Routledge
  39. Magsig B-O 2017. Water security as an evolving paradigm: local, national, regional and global considerations. Routledge Handbook of Water Law and Policy A Rieu-Clarke, AA Allan, S Hendry 382–94 London: Routledge
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Magsig B-O. 2020. Water security: a litmus test for international law. Rev. Eur. Comp. Int. Environ. Law 29:144–55
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Mahayni B 2013. Producing crisis: hegemonic debates, mediations and representations of water scarcity. Contemporary Water Governance in the Global South: Scarcity, Marketization and Participation, ed. LM Harris, JA Goldin, C Sneddon 35–44 Abingdon, UK: Routledge
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Mekonnen DZ. 2010. The Nile Basin Cooperative Framework Agreement negotiations and the adoption of a “water security” paradigm: Flight into obscurity or a logical cul-de-sac?. Eur. J. Int. Law 21:2421–40
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Perm. Court Int. Justice 1929. Territorial jurisdiction of the International Commission of the River Oder Judgm. No. 16, Ser. A, No 2327
  44. Rieu-Clarke A. 2010. The role of treaties in building international watercourse regimes: a legal perspective on existing knowledge. Water Policy 12:6822–31
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Scholtz W. 2009. Collective (environmental) security: the yeast for the refinement of international law. Yearb. Int. Environ. Law 19:1135–62
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Sultana F, Loftus A 2020. The right to water in a global context: challenges and transformations in water politics. Water Politics: Governance, Justice and the Right to Water F Sultana, A Loftus 1–14 London: Routledge
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Tarlock AD. 2008. Water security, fear mitigation and international water law. Hamline Law Rev 31:3703–28
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Tarlock D, Wouters P. 2010. Reframing the water security dialogue. J. Water Law 20:353–60
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Tignino M. 2010. Water, international peace, and security. Int. Rev. Red Cross 92:879647–74
    [Google Scholar]
  50. United Nations 2019. The human rights to safe drinking water and sanitation Gen. Assem. Resolut. 74/141, U.N. Doc. A/RES/74/141
  51. UN Environ. Progr 1978. Environmental law guidelines and principles on shared natural resources U.N. Doc. UNEP/GC.6/17
  52. Weinthal E, Vengosh A, Neville KJ 2018. The nexus of energy and water quality. Oxford Handbook of Water Politics and Policy K Conca, E Weinthal 197–226 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  53. World Water Forum 2000. Ministerial declaration of The Hague on water security in the 21st century Doc., World Water Forum Marseille, Fr. http://www.worldwatercouncil.org/fileadmin/world_water_council/documents/world_water_forum_2/The_Hague_Declaration.pdf
  54. Wouters P. 2000. The relevance and role of water law in the sustainable development of freshwater: from “hydrosovereignty” to “hydrosolidarity. .” Water Int 25:2202–7
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Wouters P 2005. Water security: What role for international water law?. Human and Environmental Security: An Agenda for Change F Dodds, T Pippard 166–81 London: Earthscan
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Wouters P. 2010. Water Security: Global, Regional and Local Challenges London: Inst. Public Policy Res .
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Wouters P 2014.. “ Dynamic cooperation”—the evolution of transboundary water cooperation. Water and the Law: Towards Sustainability M Kidd, L Feris, T Murombo, A Iza 13–65 Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Wouters P, Vinogradov S, Magsig B-O. 2009. Water security, hydrosolidarity, and international law: a river runs through it.…. Yearb. Int. Environ. Law 19:197–134
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Wouters P, Ziganshina D 2011. Tackling the global water crisis: unlocking international law as fundamental to the peaceful management of the world's shared transboundary waters—introducing the H2O paradigm. Water Resources Planning and Management RQ Grafton, K Hussey 175–229 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Zawahri NA. 2008. Designing river commissions to implement treaties and manage water disputes: the story of the Joint Water Committee and Permanent Indus Commission. Water Int 33:4464–74
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Ziganshina D. 2014. Promoting Transboundary Water Security in the Aral Sea Basin through International Law Leiden, Neth: Brill
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-010421-014915
Loading
  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error