1932

Abstract

The resurgence of populism in Europe and North America is widely thought to have placed the rule of law under pressure. But how many of the relevant developments are indeed associated with populism? And is any such association a contingent or analytic matter: Does populism inevitably threaten the rule of law, or do other conditions intervene to shape its impact? After setting out how I understand the rule of law and populism, I examine the ways in which contemporary populist discourse has challenged the rule of law through a variety of mechanisms—notably agenda setting, policy impact, influence on discretionary decisions, and convention trashing—considering the institutional and social conditions that conduce to strengthen or weaken these mechanisms in particular contexts. Finally, I consider the implications of the analysis for contemporary criminalization, assessing how many of the factors producing penal populism or overcriminalization are truly a product of populism.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-101518-042919
2019-10-13
2024-07-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/lawsocsci/15/1/annurev-lawsocsci-101518-042919.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-101518-042919&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. A and Others v. Secretary of State for the Home Department( 2004. UKHL 56
  2. Aas KS, Bosworth M 2013. Borders of Punishment: Citizenship, Crime Control and Social Exclusion Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Ackerman A, Furman R 2014. The Criminalization of Immigration Durham, NC: Carolina Acad. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Ackerman B. 2015. Three paths to constitutionalism—and the crisis of the EU. Br. J. Political Sci. 45:705–14
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Adams M, Meuwese A, Hirch Ballin E 2017. Constitutionalism and the Rule of Law: Bridging Idealism and Realism Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Aliverti A. 2013. Crimes of Mobility: Criminal Law and the Regulation of Immigration Abingdon, UK: Routledge
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Aliverti A, Bosworth M 2017. Criminal justice adjudication in an age of migration. New Crim. Law Rev.20
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Anderson B. 2013. Us and Them? The Dangerous Politics of Immigration Control Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Baer S. 2019. The rule of—and not by any—law. On the need to explain and defend constitutionalism today. Curr. Legal Probl. 71:335–68
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Barker V. 2018. Nordic Nationalism and Penal Order: Walling the Welfare State London: Routledge
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Bingham T. 2010. The Rule of Law London: Allen Lane
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Bobbio N. 1987 (1984). The Future of Democracy: A Defence of the Rules of the Game transl. R Griffen Oxford, UK: Polity (from Italian)
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Bogg A, Freedland M. 2018. Labour law in the age of populism: towards sustainable democratic engagement Res. Pap. No. 2018–15, Max Planck Inst. Comp. Public Law Int. Law Heidelberg, Ger: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3219185
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Bogira S. 2005. Courtroom 302 New York: Vintage Books
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Bottoms AE. 1995. Reflections on the criminological enterprise. Cambridge Law J 46:240–63
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Brandes TH. 2019. International law in domestic courts in an era of populism. Int. J. Const. Law press [Work. Pap. 10/17, Jean Monnet Cent. Int. & Reg. Econ Law & Justice, NY Univ School of Law, NY: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3195454 ]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Brubaker R. 2017. Why populism?. Theory Soc 46:357–85
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Canovan M. 1999. Trust the people! Populism and the two faces of democracy. Political Stud 47:2–16
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Carlin W, Boltho A. 2013. EMU's problems: asymmetric shocks of asymmetric behaviour. Comp. Econ. Stud. 55:387–403
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Cavadino M, Dignan J. 2005. Penal Systems: A Comparative Approach London: Sage
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Cheesman N. 2015. Opposing the Rule of Law: How Myanmar's Courts Make Law and Order Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Ferrari A, Kaul V, Rasumussen D 2018. The populist upsurge and the decline of diversity capital. Philos. Soc. Crit. 44:345–504
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Freedland M. 2018. Brexit, the rule of law, and the idea of sustainable governance Work. Pap. 5/2018, Oxf. Leg. Stud Oxford, UK: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3117471
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Fuller LL. 1964. The Morality of Law London: Yale Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Garland D. 2001a. The Culture of Control New York: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Garland D 2001b. Mass Imprisonment: Causes and Consequences London: Sage
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Graham-Harrison E. 2018. Vote Leave broke electoral law and British democracy is shaken. Guardian July 17. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2018/jul/17/vote-leave-broke-electoral-law-and-british-democracy-is-shaken
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Hall PA. 2014. Varieties of capitalism and the Euro crisis. West Eur. Politics 37:1223–43
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Hall PA, Soskice D 2001. Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Hall S, Critcher C, Jefferson T, Clarke J, Roberts B 1978. Policing the Crisis: Mugging, the State and Law and Order London: Palgrave Macmillan
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Haney L. 2016. Prisons of the past: penal nationalism and the politics of punishment in Central Europe. Punishm. Soc. 18:346–68
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Hay D. 1975. Property, authority and the criminal law. Albion's Fatal Tree D Hay, P Linebaugh, JG Rule, EP Thompson, C Winslow 17–63 London: Allen Lane
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Hochschild AR. 2016. Strangers in Their Own Land: Anger and Mourning on the American Right New York: New Press
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Holmes S. 2003. Lineages of the rule of law. See Maravall & Przeworski 2003 19–61
  35. Husak D. 2007. Overcriminalization Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Iversen T, Soskice D. 2018. Democracy and Prosperity: Reinventing Capitalism in a Turbulent Century Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Jakobs G. 1985. Kriminalisierung im Vorfeld einer Rechtsgutsverletzung. Z. Gesamte Strafsrechtswiss. 97:751–85
    [Google Scholar]
  38. King P. 2000. Crime, Justice and Discretion in England, 1740–1820 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  39. King P. 2006. Crime and Law in England, 1750–1840 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Kitschelt HL, McGann AJ. 1995. The Radical Right in Western Europe: A Comparative Analysis Ann Arbor: Mich. Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Kochenov D. 2017. The EU and the rule of law: Naivete or a grand design?. See Adams et al. 2017 419–45
  42. Krygier M. 2009. The rule of law: legality, teleology, sociology. Relocating the Rule of Law G Palombella, N Walker 45–69 Oxford, UK: Hart
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Krygier M. 2017a. Institutionalisation and its discontents: constitutionalism versus (anti-) constitutional populism in East Central Europe Paper presented at Transnational Law Signature Lectures London:
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Krygier M. 2017b. Reimagining the Rule of Law Paper presented at Denis Leslie Mahoney Prize Public Lecture Sydney:
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Krygier M. 2017c. Tempering power. See Adams et al. 2017 34–59
  46. Krygier M. 2019. Democracy and the rule of law. The Cambridge Companion to the Rule of Law J Meierhenrich, M Loughlin Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press In press
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Lacey N. 2007. H.L.A. Hart's rule of law: the limits of philosophy in historical perspective. Quad. Fiorent. 36:1159–80
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Lacey N. 2008a. The Prisoners’ Dilemma: Punishment and Political Economy in Contemporary Democracies Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Lacey N. 2008b. Philosophy, political morality and history: explaining the enduring resonance of the Hart-Fuller debate. NYU Law Rev 83:1059–87
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Lacey N. 2016. In Search of Criminal Responsibility: Ideas, Interests and Institutions Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Laclau E. 2005. On Populist Reason London: Verso
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Laclau E, Mouffe C. 2001. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics London: Verso. , 2nd ed..
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Landau D. 2013. Abusive constitutionalism. UC Davis Law Rev 47:189–260
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Langbein J. 2003. The Origins of Adversary Criminal Trial Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Levitsky S, Ziblatt D. 2018. How Democracies Die New York: Crown
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Lijphart A. 1984. Democracies: Patterns of Majoritarian and Consensus Governments in Twenty-One Countries New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Lijphart A. 1999. Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Lindseth PL. 2017. Between the ‘real’ and the ‘right’: explorations along the institutional-constitutional frontier. See Adams et al. 2017 60–93
  59. Litman L. 2018. How Trump corrupts the rule of law. New York Times, June 18. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/06/18/opinion/trump-zero-tolerance-border.html
  60. Loader I, Sparks R. 2017. Penal populism and epistemic crime control. The Oxford Handbook of Criminology A Liebling, S Maruna, L McCara 98–115 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press. , 6th ed..
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Loader I, Walker N. 2007. Civilising Security Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Loughlin M. 2018. The apotheosis of the rule of law. Political Q 89:659–66
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Maravall JM. 2003. The rule of law as a political weapon. See Maravall & Przeworski 2003 261–301
  64. Maravall JM, Przeworski A 2003. Democracy and the Rule of Law Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  65. McCarthy T 2018. The Supreme Court has already reshaped America—here's how. Guardian July 2. https://www.theguardian.com/law/2018/jul/02/supreme-court-donald-trump-anthony-kennedy-conservative-nominee-republicans?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Meuwese A. 2017. Peer review in the context of constitutionalism and the rule of law. See Adams et al. 2017 479–505
  67. Mounk Y. 2018. The People Versus Democracy: Why Our Freedom Is in Danger and How to Save It Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Mudde C, Rovira Kaltwasser C 2017. Populism: A Very Short Introduction Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Müller JW. 2016. What Is Populism? Philadelphia: Univ. Pa. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Neocleous M. 2008. Critique of Security Edinburgh: Edinburgh Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Ostiguy P, Roberts KM. 2016. Putting Trump in comparative perspective: populism and the politicisation of the sociocultural law. Brown J. World Aff. 23:25–50
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Palombella G. 2009. The rule of law and its core. Relocating the Rule of Law G Palombella, N Walker 17–42 Oxford, UK: Hart
    [Google Scholar]
  73. Palombella G. 2010. The rule of law as an institutional ideal. Rule of Law and Democracy L Morlino, G Palombella 3–37 Leiden, Neth: Brill
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Pankaj M. 2017. The Age of Anger: A History of the Present New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux
    [Google Scholar]
  75. Postema GJ. 2014. Fidelity in law's commonwealth. Private Law and the Rule of Law LM Austin, D Klimchuk 17–40 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  76. Pratt J. 2006. Penal Populism London: Sage
    [Google Scholar]
  77. R. Miller v. Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union( 2016.) EWHC (Ch) 2768, ( 2017. UKSC 5
  78. Ramsay P. 2012. The Insecurity State: Vulnerable Autonomy and the Right to Security in the Criminal Law Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  79. Raz J. 1979. The rule of law and its virtue. The Authority of Law: Essays on Law and Morality J Raz 210–29 Oxford, UK: Clarendon
    [Google Scholar]
  80. Reid JP. 2004. Rule of Law: The Jurisprudence of Liberty in the Seventeenth and Eighteenth Centuries DeKalb: North. Ill. Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  81. Rovira Kaltwasser C. 2013. Populism versus Constitutionalism? Comparative Perspectives on Contemporary Western Europe, Latin America, and the United States Oxford, UK: Found. Law Justice Soc.
    [Google Scholar]
  82. Rovira Kaltwasser C. 2014. The responses of populism to Dahl's democratic dilemmas. Political Stud 62:470–87
    [Google Scholar]
  83. Runciman D. 2018. How Democracy Ends New York: Basic Books
    [Google Scholar]
  84. Scheindlin SA. 2018. Trump's hard-right judges will do lasting damage to America. Guardian May 31. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/may/30/trump-judge-appointments-roe-v-wade-courts
    [Google Scholar]
  85. Scheppele KL. 2013. From a war on terrorism to global security law. Institute Letter Fall. https://www.ias.edu/ideas/2013/scheppele-terrorism
    [Google Scholar]
  86. Scheppele KL. 2017. Constitutional coups in EU law. See Adams et al. 2017 446–78
  87. Scheppele KL. 2018. Autocratic legalism. Univ. Chic. Law Rev. 85:545–84
    [Google Scholar]
  88. Schmitt C. 2007 (1927). The Concept of the Political transl G Schwab Chicago: Univ. Chic. Press (from German)
    [Google Scholar]
  89. Secret Barrister 2018. Stories of Law and How It's Broken London: Macmillan
    [Google Scholar]
  90. Shapiro I 1994. Nomos XXXVI: Rule of Law New York: NYU Press
    [Google Scholar]
  91. Shklar JN. 1964. Legalism: Law, Morals and Political Trials Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  92. [Google Scholar]
  93. Strumpf J. 2006. The Crimmigration crisis: immigrants, crime and sovereign power. Am. Univ. Law Rev. 56:368–419
    [Google Scholar]
  94. Tamanaha BZ. 2006. Law as a Means to an End: Threat to the Rule of Law Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  95. Tamanaha BZ. 2012. On the Rule of Law: History, Politics, Theory Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  96. Thompson EP. 1975. Whigs and Hunters Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin
    [Google Scholar]
  97. Urbinati N. 2014. Democracy Disfigured: Opinion, Truth and the People Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  98. Waldron J. 2008. The concept and the rule of law Sibley Lect. Ser. 29, School Law, Univ. Ga Athens, GA: https://digitalcommons.law.uga.edu/lectures_pre_arch_lectures_sibley/29
    [Google Scholar]
  99. Waldron J. 2010. Torture, Terror and Trade-Offs: Philosophy for the White House Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  100. Waldron J. 2011. The rule of law and the importance of procedure. NOMOS L: Getting to the Rule of Law JE Fleming3–31 New York: NYU Press
    [Google Scholar]
  101. Walker N. 2019. Populism and constitutional tension. Int. J. Const. Law In press [Work. Pap. 15/17, Jean Monnet Cent. Int. & Reg. Econ Law & Justice, NY Univ. School of Law, NY https://jeanmonnetprogram.org/wp-content/uploads/JMWP-15-Neil-Walker.pdf ]
    [Google Scholar]
  102. Wuthnow R. 2018. The Left Behind: Decline and Rage in Rural America Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  103. Zedner L. 2009. Security London: Routledge
    [Google Scholar]
  104. Zedner L. 2013. Is the criminal law only for citizens? A problem at the borders of punishment. See Aas & Bosworth 2013 40–57
  105. Zedner L. 2016. Penal subversions: When is punishment not punishment, who decides and on what grounds?. Theor. Criminol. 20:3–20
    [Google Scholar]
  106. Zengerle J. 2018. How the Trump administration is remaking the courts. New York Times Magazine Aug. 22. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/22/magazine/trump-remaking-courts-judiciary.html
    [Google Scholar]
  107. Zimring FE, Hawkins G, Kamin S 2001. Punishment and Democracy: Three Strikes and You're Out in California New York: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-101518-042919
Loading
  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error