1932

Abstract

The question of what responsibilities members of one generation have to later generations raises complex theoretical questions and is also of considerable practical importance. In this article, I introduce the practical issues at stake (Section 1), then explore the methodological issues surrounding how to think about intergenerational justice (Section 2), before evaluating competing normative frameworks (Sections 3–7). I conclude with a discussion of the practical challenges facing the realization of justice to future generations (Section 8).

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-052715-111749
2018-05-11
2024-04-22
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/polisci/21/1/annurev-polisci-052715-111749.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-052715-111749&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Anderson ES 1999. What is the point of equality?. Ethics 109:2287–337
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Archer D 2009. The Long Thaw: How Humans Are Changing the Next 100,000 Years of Earth's Climate Princeton, NJ/Oxford, UK: Princeton Univ. Press
  3. Barry B 1978. Circumstances of justice and future generations. Obligations to Future Generations RI Sikora, B Barry 204–48 Philadelphia: Temple Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Barry B 1989. Theories of Justice: A Treatise on Social Justice I Hemel Hempstead, UK: Harvester Wheatsheaf
  5. Barry B 1991.a Humanity and justice in global perspective. See Barry 1991e 182–210
  6. Barry B 1991.b Justice as reciprocity. See Barry 1991e 211–41
  7. Barry B 1991.c Justice between generations. See Barry 1991e 242–58
  8. Barry B 1991.d The ethics of resource depletion. See Barry 1991e 259–73
  9. Barry B 1991.e Liberty and Justice: Essays in Political Theory 2 Oxford, UK: Clarendon
  10. Barry B 1999. Sustainability and intergenerational justice. Fairness and Futurity: Essays on Environmental Sustainability and Social Justice A Dobson 93–117 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Becker LC 1986. Reciprocity London and New York: Routledge and Kegan Paul
  12. Beckerman W, Pasek J 2001. Justice, Posterity, and the Environment Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  13. Bertram C 2009. Exploitation and intergenerational justice. See Gosseries & Meyer 2009b 147–66
  14. Birnbacher D 2009. What motivates us to care for the (distant) future?. See Gosseries & Meyer 2009b 273–300
  15. Boonin D 2014. The Non-Identity Problem and the Ethics of Future People New York: Oxford Univ. Press
  16. Buchanan A 2011. Beyond Humanity? The Ethics of Biomedical Enhancement New York: Oxford Univ. Press
  17. Buchanan JM 1999 (1958). Public Principles of Public Debt: A Defense and Restatement, Volume 2 of the Collected Works of James M. Buchanan Indianapolis: Liberty Fund
  18. Cafaro P, Crist E 2012. Life on the Brink: Environmentalists Confront Overpopulation Athens, GA/London: Univ. Georgia Press
  19. Caney S 2014.a Two kinds of climate justice: avoiding harm and sharing burdens. J. Political Philos. 22:2125–49
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Caney S 2014.b Applying the principle of intergenerational equity to the 2015 multilateral processes Commissioned rep. Mary Robinson Found Climate Justice Dublin, Ireland:
  21. Caney S 2016. Political institutions for the future: a five-fold proposal. See González-Ricoy & Gosseries 2016 135–55
  22. Caney S 2018. Justice and posterity. Climate Justice: Economics and Philosophy R Kanbur, H Shue New York: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Caney S In press. On Cosmopolitanism: Equality, Ecology and Resistance Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Care NS 1982. Future generations, public policy, and the motivation problem. Environ. Ethics 4:3195–213
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Cohen GA 1989. On the currency of egalitarian justice. Ethics 99:4906–44
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Conly S 2016. One Child: Do We Have a Right to More? New York: Oxford Univ. Press
  27. Crutzen PJ 2002. Geology of mankind. Nature 415:686723
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Daly HE 1996. Beyond Growth: The Economics of Sustainable Development Boston: Beacon
  29. De George RT 1981. The environment, rights, and future generations. Responsibilities to Future Generations: Environmental Ethics E Partridge 157–65 Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books
    [Google Scholar]
  30. de Shalit A 1995. Why Posterity Matters: Environmental Policies and Future Generations London: Routledge
  31. Dobson A 1998. Justice and the Environment: Conceptions of Environmental Sustainability and Theories of Social Justice Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  32. Dyson K 2014. States, Debt, and Power: “Saints” and “Sinners” in European History and Integration New York: Oxford Univ. Press
  33. Easterlin RA 2010. Happiness, Growth, and the Life Cycle H Hinte, KF Zimmermann New York: Oxford Univ. Press
  34. Elliot R 1989. The rights of future people. J. Appl. Philos. 6:2159–69
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Elster J 2000. Ulysses Unbound: Studies in Rationality, Precommitment, and Constraints New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  36. Esping-Andersen G 2009. The Incomplete Revolution: Adapting to Women's New Roles Cambridge, UK: Polity
  37. Feinberg J 1980. The rights of animals and unborn generations. Rights, Justice, and the Bounds of Liberty: Essays in Social Philosophy159–84 Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Finneron-Burns E 2015. What we owe to future people: a contractualist account of intergenerational ethics DPhil Thesis Univ. Oxford:
  39. Goetz KH 2014. A question of time: responsive and responsible democratic politics. West Eur. Politics 37:2379–99
    [Google Scholar]
  40. González-Ricoy I, Gosseries A 2016. Institutions for Future Generations Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  41. Goodin RE 1985. Protecting the Vulnerable: A Reanalysis of our Social Responsibilities Chicago and London: Univ. Chicago Press
  42. Gosseries A 2001. What do we owe the next generation(s)?. Loyola Los Angeles Law Rev 35:1293–354
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Gosseries A, Meyer L 2009.a Introduction—intergenerational justice and its challenges. See Gosseries & Meyer 2009b 1–21
  44. Gosseries A, Meyer LH 2009.b Intergenerational Justice New York: Oxford Univ. Press
  45. Harman E 2004. Can we harm and benefit in creating?. Philos. Perspect. 18:189–113
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Harper S 2014. Economic and social implications of aging societies. Science 346:6209587–91
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Heyd D 1992. Genethics: Moral Issues in the Creation of People Berkeley/Los Angeles: Univ. Calif. Press
  48. Heyward C 2008. Can the all-affected principle include future persons? Green deliberative democracy and the non-identity problem. Environ. Politics 17:4625–43
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Holmes S 1995. Passions and Constraint: On the Theory of Liberal Democracy Chicago and London: Chicago Univ. Press
  50. Hubin RC 1976. Justice and future generations. Philos. Public Aff. 6:170–83
    [Google Scholar]
  51. IPCC. 2014. Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Working Group III Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change O Edenhofer, R Pichs-Madruga, Y Sokona, J Minx, E Farahani, et al Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  52. Jacobs AM 2011. Governing for the Long Term: Democracy and the Politics of Investment New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
  53. Jefferson T 1999 (1789). To James Madison, Paris, September 6, 1789. Jefferson: Political Writings J Appleby, T Ball 593–98 New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Jefferson T 1999 (1813). To John Wayles Eppes, Monticello, June 24, 1813. Jefferson: Political Writings J Appleby, T Ball 598–604 New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Jonas H 1984. The Imperative of Responsibility: In Search of an Ethics for the Technological Age, transl H Jonas in collaboration with D Herr Chicago/London: Univ. Chicago Press
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Karnein A 2012. A Theory of Unborn Life: From Abortion to Genetic Manipulation New York: Oxford Univ. Press
  57. Kumar R 2003. Who can be wronged?. Philos. Public Aff. (31:299–118
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Liberto H 2014. The exploitation solution to the non-identity problem. Philos. Stud. 167:173–88
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Littmann J 2014. Antimicrobial resistance and distributive justice Doctoral Thesis, University College London: http://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/1427440
  60. Littmann J, Viens AM 2015. The ethical significance of antimicrobial resistance. Public Health Ethics 8:3209–24
    [Google Scholar]
  61. MacKenzie MK 2016. Institutional design and sources of short-termism. See González-Ricoy & Gosseries 2016 24–45
  62. Malthus TR 1993 (1798). An Essay on the Principle of Population with an Introduction and Notes by Geoffrey Gilbert New York: Oxford Univ. Press
  63. Meyer L 2016. Intergenerational justice. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy Summer 2016 edition, ed. EN Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2016/entries/justice-intergenerational
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Meyer LH, Roser D 2009. Enough for the future. See Gosseries & Meyer 2009b 219–48
  65. Neumayer E 2003. Weak versus Strong Sustainability: Exploring the Limits of Two Opposing Paradigms Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar. , 2nd ed..
  66. Nolt J 2011. Greenhouse gas emission and the domination of posterity. The Ethics of Global Climate Change DG Arnold 60–76 New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Nuffield Council on Bioethics. 2016. Genome Editing: An Ethical Review London: Nuffield Counc. Bioethics
  68. Nussbaum MC 2011. Creating Capabilities: The Human Development Approach Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard Univ. Press
  69. O'Neill M 2008. What should egalitarians believe?. Philos. Public Aff. 36:2119–56
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Otsuka M 2003. Libertarianism without Inequality Oxford, UK: Clarendon
  71. Page EA 2006. Climate Change, Justice and Future Generations Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar
  72. Page EA 2007. Justice between generations: investigating a sufficientarian approach. J. Glob. Ethics 3:13–20
    [Google Scholar]
  73. Paine T 2000 (1791). Rights of man. Part 1. Political Writings B Kuklick 57–153 New York: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Parfit D 1984. Reasons and Persons Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  75. Parfit D 1997. Equality and priority. Ratio 10:3202–21
    [Google Scholar]
  76. Rawls J 1971. A Theory of Justice Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  77. Rawls J 1993. Political Liberalism New York: Columbia Univ. Press
  78. Rawls J 2001. Justice as Fairness: A Restatement E Kelly Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  79. Reiman J 2007. Being fair to future people: the non-identity problem in the original position. Philos. Public Aff. 35:169–92
    [Google Scholar]
  80. Rendall M 2011. Non‐identity, sufficiency and exploitation. J. Political Philos. 19:2229–47
    [Google Scholar]
  81. Roberts M 2015. The nonidentity problem. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy Winter 2015 edition, ed. EN Zalta. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2015/entries/nonidentity-problem
    [Google Scholar]
  82. Scheffler S 2010. Equality and Tradition: Questions of Value in Moral and Political Theory New York: Oxford Univ. Press
  83. Schelling TC 2006. Strategies of Commitment and Other Essays Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  84. Schokkaert E, van Parijs P 2003. Social justice and the reform of Europe's pension systems. J. Eur. Soc. Policy 13:3245–63
    [Google Scholar]
  85. Sen A 2009. The Idea of Justice London: Allen Lane
  86. Steffen W, Broadgate W, Deutsch L, Gaffney O, Ludwig C 2015. The trajectory of the Anthropocene: the great acceleration. Anthropocene Rev 2:181–98
    [Google Scholar]
  87. Steffen W, Grinevald J, Crutzen P, McNeill J 2011. The Anthropocene: conceptual and historical perspectives. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Ser. A, Math. Phys. Sci. 369(1938):842–67
    [Google Scholar]
  88. Temkin LS 1993. Inequality New York: Oxford Univ. Press
  89. Thompson DF 2010. Representing future generations: political presentism and democratic trusteeship. Crit. Rev. Int. Soc. Political Philos. 13:117–37
    [Google Scholar]
  90. Tremmel JC 2009. A Theory of Intergenerational Justice London: Earthscan
  91. Valdman M 2009. A theory of wrongful exploitation. Philos. Imprint 9:61–14
    [Google Scholar]
  92. Wertheimer A 1996. Exploitation Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  93. Woodward J 1986. The non-identity problem. Ethics 96:4804–31
    [Google Scholar]
  94. World Commission on Environment and Development. 1987. Our Common Future Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-polisci-052715-111749
Loading
  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error