1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Resource Economics
  4. Volume 9, 2017
  5. Article

Annual Review of Resource Economics

Volume 9, 2017

Is the Environment Compatible with Growth? Adopting an Integrated Framework for Sustainability

Abstract

This review develops an integrated baseline model to assess the trade-offs between the natural environment and economic growth. Consumption growth is considered in terms of both welfare and sustainability. The framework features capital accumulation and the sectoral structure of the economy as key elements to cope with resource scarcity and pollution. Model extensions that vary the number of sectors and inputs, change functional forms, and introduce poor input substitution and population growth are presented. This framework highlights the dual role of inputs as a source of environmental problems and part of the solution; it also addresses uncertainty and momentum effects. This review concludes that the environment and economic growth can be compatible but that small deviations from the optimal paths might entail unsustainable development. Critical issues for sustainability include insufficient foresight, increasing damage intensity, and suboptimal policy making, although population growth and poor input substitution are not necessarily precarious for future development.

Keyword(s): endogenous growth, multisector model, natural environment, poor substitution, population growth
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-resource-100516-053332
2017-10-05
2025-04-29
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/resource/9/1/annurev-resource-100516-053332.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-resource-100516-053332&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Acemoglu D, Aghion P, Bursztyn L, Hemous D. 2012. The environment and directed technical change. Am. Econ. Rev. 102:1131–66 [Google Scholar]
  2. Asheim GB, Buchholz W, Tungodden B. 2001. Justifying sustainability. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 41:3252–68 [Google Scholar]
  3. Barbier EB. 1999. Endogenous growth and natural resource scarcity. Environ. Resour. Econ. 14:151–74 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bovenberg AL, Smulders S. 1995. Environmental quality and pollution-augmenting technological change in a two-sector endogenous growth model. J. Public Econ. 57:369–91 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bovenberg AL, Smulders S. 1996. Transitional impacts of environmental policy in an endogenous growth model. Int. Econ. Rev. 37:4861–93 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bretschger L. 1998. How to substitute in order to sustain: knowledge driven growth under environmental restrictions. Environ. Dev. Econ. 3:4425–42 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bretschger L. 2013. Population growth and natural resource scarcity: long-run development under seemingly unfavourable conditions. Scand. J. Econ. 115:3722–55 [Google Scholar]
  8. Bretschger L. 2015. Energy prices, growth, and the channels in between: theory and evidence. Resour. Energy Econ. 39:29–52 [Google Scholar]
  9. Bretschger L, Karydas C. 2016. Optimum growth and carbon policies with lags in the climate system.. Eur. Econ. Rev. In press [Google Scholar]
  10. Bretschger L, Ramer R, Schwark F. 2011. Growth effects of carbon policies: applying a fully dynamic CGE model with heterogeneous capital. Resour. Energy Econ. 33:4963–80 [Google Scholar]
  11. Bretschger L, Schäfer A. 2017. Dirty history versus clean expectations: Can energy policies provide momentum for growth?. Eur. Econ. Rev. In press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2017.01.001 [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  12. Bretschger L, Smulders S. 2012. Sustainability and substitution of exhaustible natural resources: how resource prices affect long-term R&D investments. J. Econ. Dyn. Control 36:4536–49 [Google Scholar]
  13. Bretschger L, Suphaphiphat N. 2014. Effective climate policies in a dynamic north-south model. Eur. Econ. Rev. 69:59–77 [Google Scholar]
  14. Bretschger L, Valente S. 2011. Climate change and uneven development. Scand. J. Econ. 113:4825–45 [Google Scholar]
  15. Bretschger L, Vinogradova A. 2016. Escaping Damocles’ sword: endogenous climate shocks in a growing economy Work. Pap., ETH Zurich [Google Scholar]
  16. Brock WA, Taylor MS. 2005. Economic growth and the environment: a review of theory and empirics. Handbook of Economic Growth P Aghion, S Durlauf 11749–821 Amsterdam: Elsevier [Google Scholar]
  17. Dasgupta PS, Heal GM. 1974. The optimal depletion of exhaustible resources. Rev. Econ. Stud. Symp. 41:3–28 [Google Scholar]
  18. Di Maria C, Valente S. 2008. Hicks meets Hotelling: the direction of technical change in capital-resource economies. Environ. Dev. Econ. 13:691–717 [Google Scholar]
  19. Ehrlich PR. 1968. The Population Bomb. New York: Ballantine [Google Scholar]
  20. Gerlagh R, Liski M. 2016. Carbon prices for the next hundred years. Econ. J. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecoj.12436 [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  21. Grimaud A, Rouge L. 2003. Non-renewable resources and growth with vertical innovations: optimum, equilibrium and economic policies. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 45:433–53 [Google Scholar]
  22. Grimaud A, Rouge L. 2008. Environment, directed technical change and economic policy. Environ. Resour. Econ. 41:439–63 [Google Scholar]
  23. Groth C. 2007. A new-growth perspective on non-renewable resources. Sustainable Resource Use and Economic Dynamics L Bretschger, S Smulders 127–63 New York: Springer [Google Scholar]
  24. Groth C, Schou P. 2002. Can non-renewable resources alleviate the knife-edge character of endogenous growth?. Oxf. Econ. Papers 54:386–411 [Google Scholar]
  25. Kallis G, Kerschner C, Martinez-Alier J. 2012. The economics of degrowth. Ecol. Econ. 84:172–80 [Google Scholar]
  26. Meadows DH, Meadows DL, Randers R, Behrens WW. 1972. The Limits to Growth New York: Universe [Google Scholar]
  27. Michel P, Rotillon G. 1995. Disutility of pollution and endogenous growth. Environ. Resour. Econ. 6:279–300 [Google Scholar]
  28. Nordhaus WD, Boyer J. 2000. Warming the World Cambridge, MA: MIT Press [Google Scholar]
  29. Peretto P, Valente S. 2015. Growth on a finite planet: resources, technology and population in the long run. J. Econ. Growth 20:3305–31 [Google Scholar]
  30. Pittel K, Bretschger L. 2010. The implications of heterogeneous resource intensities on technical change and growth. Can. J. Econ. 43:41173–97 [Google Scholar]
  31. Rebelo S. 1991. Long-run policy analysis and long-run growth. J. Polit. Econ. 99:500–21 [Google Scholar]
  32. Romer PM. 1990. Endogenous technical change. J. Polit. Econ. 98:S71–102 [Google Scholar]
  33. Scholz CM, Ziemes G. 1999. Exhaustible resources, monopolistic competition, and endogenous growth. Environ. Resour. Econ. 13:169–85 [Google Scholar]
  34. Schou P. 2000. Polluting nonrenewable resources and growth. Environ. Resour. Econ. 16:211–27 [Google Scholar]
  35. Smulders S. 1999. Endogenous growth theory and the environment. Handbook of Environmental and Resource Economics JCJM van den Bergh 610–21 Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar [Google Scholar]
  36. Smulders S, de Nooij M. 2003. Theimpact of energy conservation on technology and economic growth. Resour. Energy Econ. 25:159–79 [Google Scholar]
  37. Solow RM. 1974. Intergenerational equity and exhaustible resources. Rev. Econ. Stud. Symp. 41:29–45 [Google Scholar]
  38. Stern N. 2007. Stern Review: The Economics of Climate Change Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  39. Stiglitz JE. 1974. Growth with exhaustible natural resources: efficient and optimal growth paths. Rev. Econ. Stud. 41:123–37 [Google Scholar]
  40. Stiglitz JE, Sen A, Fitoussi J-P. 2010. Mismeasuring Our Lives New York: The New Press [Google Scholar]
  41. Suzuki H. 1976. On the possibility of steadily growing per capita consumption in an economy with a wasting and non-replenishable resource. Rev. Econ. Stud. 43:3527–35 [Google Scholar]
  42. Van der Meijden GC, Smulders SA. 2017. Carbon lock-in: the role of expectations. Int. Econ. Rev. In press. [Google Scholar]
  43. Van der Ploeg F, Withagen C. 2014. Growth, renewables and the optimal carbon tax. Int. Econ. Rev. 55:1283–311 [Google Scholar]
  44. Xepapadeas A. 2005. Economic growth and the environment. Handbook of Environmental Economics 3 KG Mäler, JR Vincent 1219–71 Amsterdam: Elsevier [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-resource-100516-053332
Loading
Is the Environment Compatible with Growth? Adopting an Integrated Framework for Sustainability
Annual Review of Resource Economics 9, 185 (2017); https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-resource-100516-053332
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-resource-100516-053332
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-resource-100516-053332
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error