Genetically modified (GM) crops have been used commercially for more than 10 years. Available impact studies of insect-resistant and herbicide-tolerant crops show that these technologies are beneficial to farmers and consumers, producing large aggregate welfare gains as well as positive effects for the environment and human health. The advantages of future applications could even be much bigger. Given a conducive institutional framework, GM crops can contribute significantly to global food security and poverty reduction. Nonetheless, widespread public reservations have led to a complex system of regulations. Overregulation has become a real threat for the further development and use of GM crops. The costs in terms of foregone benefits may be large, especially for developing countries. Economics research has an important role to play in designing efficient regulatory mechanisms and agricultural innovation systems.


Article metrics loading...

Loading full text...

Full text loading...


Literature Cited

  1. Alston JM, Norton GW, Pardey PG. 1995. Science Under Scarcity: Principles and Practices of Agricultural Research Evaluation and Priority Setting Ithaca, NY: Cornell Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  2. Altieri MA. 2001. Genetic Engineering in Agriculture: The Myths, Environmental Risks and Alternatives Oakland, CA: Food First [Google Scholar]
  3. Anderson K, Valenzuela E, Jackson LA. 2008. Recent and prospective adoption of genetically modified cotton: a global computable general equilibrium analysis of economic impacts. Econ. Dev. Cult. Change 56:26596 [Google Scholar]
  4. Anderson K, Jackson LA, Nielsen CP. 2005. Genetically modified rice adoption: implications for welfare and poverty alleviation. J. Econ. Integr. 20:77188 [Google Scholar]
  5. Anderson K, Yao S. 2003. China, GMOs and world trade in agricultural and textile products. Pac. Econ. Rev. 8:15769 [Google Scholar]
  6. Basu AK, Qaim M. 2007. On the adoption of genetically modified seeds in developing countries and the optimal types of government intervention. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 89:784804 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bates SL, Zhao JZ, Roush RT, Shelton AM. 2005. Insect resistance management in GM crops: past, present and future. Nat. Biotechnol. 23:5762 [Google Scholar]
  8. Beckmann V, Soregaroli C, Wesseler J. 2006. Coexistence rules and regulations in the European Union. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 88:119399 [Google Scholar]
  9. Bennett R, Morse S, Ismael Y. 2003. Bt cotton, pesticides, labour and health: a case study of smallholder farmers in the Makhathini Flats, Republic of South Africa. Outlook Agric. 32:12328 [Google Scholar]
  10. Bennett R, Kambhampati U, Morse S, Ismael Y. 2006. Farm-level economic performance of genetically modified cotton in Maharashtra, India. Rev. Agric. Econ. 28:5971 [Google Scholar]
  11. Bouis H. 2007. The potential of genetically modified food crops to improve human nutrition in developing countries. J. Dev. Stud. 43:7996 [Google Scholar]
  12. Bradford KJ, Van Deynze A, Gutterson N, Parrott W, Strauss SH. 2005. Regulating transgenic crops sensibly: lessons from plant breeding, biotechnology and genomics. Nat. Biotechnol. 23:43944 [Google Scholar]
  13. Breustedt G, Müller-Scheeßel J, Latacz-Lohmann U. 2008. Forecasting the adoption of GM oilseed rape: evidence from a discrete choice experiment in Germany. J. Agric. Econ. 59:23756 [Google Scholar]
  14. Brookes G, Barfoot P. 2005. GM Crops: The Global Socioeconomic and Environmental Impact—The First Nine Years Dorchester: PG Econ. [Google Scholar]
  15. Brookes G, Barfoot P. 2008. GM Crops: Global Socioeconomic and Environmental Impacts 1996–2008 Dorchester: PG Econ. [Google Scholar]
  16. Byerlee D, Fischer K. 2002. Accessing modern science: policy and institutional options for agricultural biotechnology in developing countries. World Dev. 30:93148 [Google Scholar]
  17. Carpenter J, Felsot A, Goode T, Hammig M, Onstad D, Sankula S. 2002. Comparative Environmental Impacts of Biotechnology-Derived and Traditional Soybean, Corn, and Cotton Crops Ames, IA: Counc. Agric. Sci. Technol. [Google Scholar]
  18. Cohen MB, Chen M, Bentur JS, Heong KL, Ye G. 2008. Bt rice in Asia: potential benefits, impact, and sustainability. See Romeis et al. 2008 8:22348 [Google Scholar]
  19. Cooper J, Lipper LM, Zilberman D. 2005. Agricultural Biodiversity and Biotechnology in Economic Development New York: Springer [Google Scholar]
  20. Crost B, Shankar B, Bennett R, Morse S. 2007. Bias from farmer self-selection in genetically modified crop productivity estimates: evidence from Indian data. J. Agric. Econ. 58:2436 [Google Scholar]
  21. Dawe D, Robertson R, Unnevehr L. 2002. Golden Rice: What role could it play in alleviation of vitamin A deficiency. Food Policy 27:54160 [Google Scholar]
  22. Demont M, Cerovska M, Daems W, Dillen K, Fogarasi J, Mathijs E et al. 2008. Ex ante impact assessment under imperfect information: biotechnology in new member states of the EU. J. Agric. Econ. 59:46386 [Google Scholar]
  23. Demont M, Devos Y. 2008. Regulating coexistence of GM and non-GM crops without jeopardizing economic incentives. Trends Biotechnol. 26:35358 [Google Scholar]
  24. Demont M, Tollens E. 2004. First impact of biotechnology in the EU: Bt maize adoption in Spain. Ann. Appl. Biol. 145:197207 [Google Scholar]
  25. Demont M, Wesseler J, Tollens E. 2004. Biodiversity versus transgenic sugarbeet: the one euro question. Eur. Rev. Agric. Econ. 31:118 [Google Scholar]
  26. Duffy M. 2001. Who benefits from biotechnology Presented at Am. Seed Trade Assoc. Meet. 5-7 December Chicago, Ill.: [Google Scholar]
  27. Edmeades S, Smale M. 2006. A trait-based model of the potential demand for a genetically engineered food crop in a developing economy. Agric. Econ. 35:35161 [Google Scholar]
  28. Elbehri A, MacDonald S. 2004. Estimating the impact of transgenic Bt cotton on west and central Africa: a general equilibrium approach. World Dev. 22:204964 [Google Scholar]
  29. Evenson RE, Santaniello V, Zilberman D. 2002. Economic and Social Issues in Agricultural Biotechnology Oxfordshire, UK: CABI Publ. [Google Scholar]
  30. Falck-Zepeda JB, Traxler G, Nelson RG. 2000a. Rent creation and distribution from biotechnology innovations: the case of Bt cotton and herbicide-tolerant soybeans in 1997. Agribusiness 16:2132 [Google Scholar]
  31. Falck-Zepeda JB, Traxler G, Nelson RG. 2000b. Surplus distribution from the introduction of a biotechnology innovation. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 82:36069 [Google Scholar]
  32. Fan S, Chan-Kang C, Qian K, Krishnaiah K. 2005. National and international agricultural research and rural poverty: the case of rice research in India and China. Agric. Econ. 33:36979 [Google Scholar]
  33. FAO 2004. The State of Food and Agriculture 2003-04; Agricultural Biotechnology: Meeting the Needs of the Poor Rome: FAO [Google Scholar]
  34. Fernandez-Cornejo J, Caswell M. 2006. The First Decade of Genetically Engineered Crops in the United States. Economic Information Bulletin 11 Washington, DC: US Dep. Agric. [Google Scholar]
  35. Fernandez-Cornejo J, Hendricks C, Mishra A. 2005. Technology adoption and off-farm household income: the case of herbicide-tolerant soybeans. J. Agric. Appl. Econ. 37:54963 [Google Scholar]
  36. Fernandez-Cornejo J, Klotz-Ingram C, Jans S. 2002. Farm-level effects of adopting herbicide tolerant soybeans in the USA. J. Agric. Appl. Econ. 34:14963 [Google Scholar]
  37. Fernandez-Cornejo J, Li J. 2005. The impacts of adopting genetically engineered crops in the USA: the case of Bt corn Presented at Am. Agric. Econ. Assoc. Annu. Meet. 24–27 July Providence, RI: [Google Scholar]
  38. Fitt G. 2003. Implementation and impacts of transgenic Bt cottons in Australia. ICAC Rec. December:1419 [Google Scholar]
  39. Friends of the Earth 2008. Who Benefits from GM crops? The Rise in Pesticide Use. Agriculture and Food Issue 112 Amsterdam: Friends Earth Int. [Google Scholar]
  40. Frisvold G, Reeves J. 2007. Economy-wide impacts of Bt cotton Presented at Annu. Beltwide Cotton Conf., Natl. Cotton Counc. Am. New Orleans: [Google Scholar]
  41. Fulton M, Keyowski L. 1999. The producer benefits of herbicide-resistant canola. AgBioForum 2:8593 [Google Scholar]
  42. Gandhi VP, Namboodiri NV. 2006. The adoption and economics of Bt cotton in India: preliminary results from a study Work. Pap. 2006-09-04 Indian Inst. Manag.: [Google Scholar]
  43. Gianessi LP, Silvers CS, Sankula S, Carpenter JE. 2002. Plant Biotechnology: Current and Potential Impact for Improving Pest Management in US Agriculture: An Analysis of 40 Case Studies Washington, DC: Natl. Center Food Agric. Policy [Google Scholar]
  44. Giannakas K. 2002. Infringement of intellectual property rights: causes and consequences. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 84:48294 [Google Scholar]
  45. Giannakas K, Yiannaka A. 2008. Market and welfare effects of second-generation, consumer-oriented GM products. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 90:15271 [Google Scholar]
  46. Giannakas K, Fulton M. 2002. Consumption effects of genetic modification: What if consumers are right. Agric. Econ. 27:97109 [Google Scholar]
  47. Golan E, Kuchler F, Mitchell L. 2001. Economics of food labeling. J. Consum. Policy 24:11784 [Google Scholar]
  48. Gómez-Barbero M, Berbel J, Rodriguez-Cerezo E. 2008. Bt corn in Spain—the performance of the EU's first GM crop. Nat. Biotechnol. 26:38486 [Google Scholar]
  49. Gouse M, Pray C, Schimmelpfennig D, Kirsten J. 2006. Three seasons of subsistence insect-resistant maize in South Africa: Have smallholders benefited. AgBioForum 9:1522 [Google Scholar]
  50. Gouse M, Pray C, Schimmelpfennig D. 2004. The distribution of benefits from Bt cotton adoption in South Africa. AgBioForum 7:18794 [Google Scholar]
  51. Graff GD, Cullen SE, Bradford KJ, Zilberman D, Bennett AB. 2003. The public-private structure of intellectual property ownership in agricultural biotechnology. Nat. Biotechnol. 21:98995 [Google Scholar]
  52. Graff G, Zilberman D. 2001. An intellectual property clearinghouse for agricultural biotechnology. Nat. Biotechnol. 19:117980 [Google Scholar]
  53. Gruère GP, Mehta-Bhatt P, Sengupta D. 2008. Bt cotton and farmer suicides in India: reviewing the evidence Discuss. Pap. 00808 Int. Food Policy Res. Inst.: [Google Scholar]
  54. Halford NG. 2006. Plant Biotechnology: Current and Future Uses of Genetically Modified Crops Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons [Google Scholar]
  55. Hareau GG, Mills BF, Norton GW. 2006. The potential benefits of herbicide-resistant transgenic rice in Uruguay: lessons for small developing countries. Food Policy 31:16279 [Google Scholar]
  56. Hareau G, Norton GE, Mills BF, Peterson E. 2005. Potential benefits of transgenic rice in Asia: a general equilibrium analysis. Q. J. Int. Agric. 44:22946 [Google Scholar]
  57. Hazell P, Ramasamy C. 1991. The Green Revolution Reconsidered: The Impact of High-Yielding Rice Varieties in South India Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  58. Herdt RW. 2006. Biotechnology in agriculture. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 31:26595 [Google Scholar]
  59. Herring RJ. 2007. The genomics revolution and development studies: science, poverty and politics. J. Dev. Stud. 43:130 [Google Scholar]
  60. Hertel T. 1997. Global Trade Analysis: Modeling and Applications New York: Cambridge Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  61. Hossain F, Pray CE, Lu Y, Huang J, Hu R. 2004. Genetically modified cotton and farmers’ health in China. Int. J. Occup. Environ. Health 10:296303 [Google Scholar]
  62. Hu R, Huang J, Lin H, Rozelle S. 2006. Bt cotton in China: Are secondary insect infestations offsetting the benefits in farmer fields Presented at Int. Consort. Agric. Biotechnol. Res. Conf., 10th Ravello, Italy: [Google Scholar]
  63. Huang J, Hu R, Pray C, Qiao F, Rozelle S. 2003. Biotechnology as an alterative to chemical pesticides: a case study of Bt cotton in China. Agric. Econ. 29:5568 [Google Scholar]
  64. Huang J, Hu R, Rozelle S, Pray C. 2005. Insect-resistant GM rice in farmers’ fields: assessing productivity and health effects in China. Science 308:68890 [Google Scholar]
  65. Huang J, Hu R, Rozelle S, Pray C. 2008. Genetically modified rice, yields and pesticides: assessing farm-level productivity effects in China. Econ. Dev. Cult. Change 56:24163 [Google Scholar]
  66. Huang J, Hu R, Rozelle S, Qiao F, Pray CE. 2002a. Transgenic varieties and productivity of smallholder cotton farmers in China. Aust. J. Agric. Resour. Econ. 46:36787 [Google Scholar]
  67. Huang J, Hu R, van Meijl H, van Tongeren F. 2004. Biotechnology boosts to crop productivity in China: trade and welfare implications. J. Dev. Econ. 75:2754 [Google Scholar]
  68. Huang J, Rozelle S, Pray C, Wang Q. 2002b. Plant biotechnology in China. Science 295:67477 [Google Scholar]
  69. Huffman WE, Shogren JF, Rousu M, Tegene A. 2003. Consumer willingness to pay for genetically modified food labels in a market with diverse information: evidence from experimental auctions. J. Agric. Resour. Econ. 28:481502 [Google Scholar]
  70. Hurley TM, Babcock BA, Hellmich RL. 2001. Bt corn and insect resistance: an economic assessment of refuges. J. Agric. Resour. Econ. 26:17694 [Google Scholar]
  71. James C. 2008. Global status of commercialized biotech/GM crops: 2008. ISAAA Briefs 39 Ithaca, NY: Int. Serv. Acquis. Agri-Biotech Appl. [Google Scholar]
  72. Jefferson-Moore KY, Traxler G. 2005. Second-generation GMOs: Where to from here. AgBioForum 8:14350 [Google Scholar]
  73. Just RE, Alston JM, Zilberman D. 2006. Regulating Agricultural Biotechnology: Economics and Policy New York: Springer [Google Scholar]
  74. Kalaitzandonakes N. 2003. The Economic and Environmental Impacts of Agbiotech New York: Kluwer [Google Scholar]
  75. Kalaitzandonakes N, Alston JM, Bradford KJ. 2007. Compliance costs for regulatory approval of new biotech crops. Nat. Biotechnol. 25:50911 [Google Scholar]
  76. Kambhampati U, Morse S, Bennett R, Ismael Y. 2006. Farm-level performance of genetically modified cotton—a frontier analysis of cotton production in Maharashtra. Outlook Agric. 35:29197 [Google Scholar]
  77. Kimenju SC, De Groote H. 2008. Consumer willingness to pay for genetically modified food in Kenya. Agric. Econ. 38:3546 [Google Scholar]
  78. Krishna VV, Qaim M. 2007. Estimating the adoption of Bt eggplant in India: Who benefits from public-private partnership. Food Policy 32:52343 [Google Scholar]
  79. Krishna VV, Qaim M. 2008a. Consumer attitudes toward GM food and pesticide residues in India. Rev. Agric. Econ. 30:23351 [Google Scholar]
  80. Krishna VV, Qaim M. 2008b. Potential impacts of Bt eggplant on economic surplus and farmers’ health in India. Agric. Econ. 38:16780 [Google Scholar]
  81. Lapan HE, Moschini G. 2004. Innovation and trade with endogenous market failure: the case of genetically modified products. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 86:63448 [Google Scholar]
  82. Lence SH, Hayes DJ. 2005. Genetically modified crops: their market and welfare impacts. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 87:93150 [Google Scholar]
  83. Lichtenberg E, Zilberman D. 1986. The economics of damage control: why specification matters. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 68:26173 [Google Scholar]
  84. Lichtenberg E, Zilberman D. 1988. Efficient regulation of environmental health risks. Q. J. Econ. 103:16778 [Google Scholar]
  85. Lipton M. 2001. Reviving global poverty reduction: what role for genetically modified plants. J. Int. Dev. 13:82346 [Google Scholar]
  86. Lusk JL. 2003. Effect of cheap talk on consumer willingness to pay for Golden Rice. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 85:84056 [Google Scholar]
  87. Lusk JL, Jamal M, Kurlander L, Roucan M, Taulman L. 2005. A meta analysis of genetically modified food valuation studies. J. Agric. Resour. Econ. 30:2844 [Google Scholar]
  88. Lusk JL, Traill WB, House LO, Valli C, Jaeger SR et al. 2006. Comparative advantage in demand: experimental evidence of preferences for genetically modified food in the United States and European Union. J. Agric. Econ. 57:121 [Google Scholar]
  89. Marra MC, Pardey PG, Alston JM. 2002. The payoffs to agricultural biotechnology: an assessment of the evidence EPTD Discuss. Pap. 87 Int. Food Policy Res. Inst.: [Google Scholar]
  90. McCluskey JJ, Ouchi H, Grimsrud KM, Wahl TI. 2003. Consumer response to genetically modified food products in Japan. Agric. Resour. Econ. Rev. 32:22231 [Google Scholar]
  91. Miller HI, Conko G. 2004. The Frankenfood Myth—How Protest and Politics Threaten the Biotech Revolution Westport, CT: Praeger [Google Scholar]
  92. Moon W, Balasubramanian SK. 2004. Public attitudes towards agro-biotechnology: the mediating role of risk perceptions on the impact of trust, awareness and outrage. Rev. Agric. Econ. 26:186208 [Google Scholar]
  93. Morse S, Bennett R, Ismael Y. 2004. Why Bt cotton pays for small-scale producers in South Africa. Nat. Biotechnol. 22:37980 [Google Scholar]
  94. Moschini G. 2008. Biotechnology and the development of food markets: retrospect and prospects. Eur. Rev. Agric. Econ. 35:33155 [Google Scholar]
  95. Moschini G. 2006. Pharmaceutical and industrial traits in genetically modified crops: coexistence with conventional agriculture. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 88:118492 [Google Scholar]
  96. Moschini G, Lapan H. 1997. Intellectual property rights and the welfare effects of agricultural R&D. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 79:122942 [Google Scholar]
  97. Moschini G, Lapan H, Sobolevsky A. 2000. Roundup Ready soybeans and welfare effects in the soybean complex. Agribusiness 16:3355 [Google Scholar]
  98. Naseem A, Pray C. 2004.Economic impact analysis of genetically modified crops Handbook of Plant Biotechnology P Christou, H Klee 51959–91 Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons [Google Scholar]
  99. Nielsen CP, Anderson K. 2001. Global market effects of alternative market responses to genetically modified organisms. Weltwirtsch. Arch. 137:32046 [Google Scholar]
  100. Paarlberg RL. 2008. Starved for Science: How Biotechnology is Being Kept Out of Africa Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  101. Pemsl DE, Gutierrez AP, Waibel H. 2008. The economics of biotechnology under ecosystem disruption. Ecol. Econ. 66:17783 [Google Scholar]
  102. Pemsl D, Waibel H. 2007. Assessing the profitability of different crop protection strategies in cotton: case study results from Shandong Province, China. Agric. Syst. 95:2836 [Google Scholar]
  103. Pew Initiative on Food and Biotechnology 2007. Applications of Biotechnology for Functional Foods Washington, DC: Pew Initiat. Food Biotechnol. [Google Scholar]
  104. Phillips PWB. 2003. The economic impact of herbicide tolerant canola in Canada. See Kalaitzandonakes 2003 7:11940 [Google Scholar]
  105. Pinstrup-Andersen P, Schioler E. 2001. Seeds of Contention: World Hunger and the Global Controversy over GM Crops Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  106. Potrykus I. 2008. Golden Rice—from idea to reality. Bertebos Prize lecture Presented at Bertebos Conf., 7–9 September Falkenberg Sweden: [Google Scholar]
  107. Pray CE, Bengali P, Ramaswami B. 2005. The cost of biosafety regulations: the Indian experience. Q. J. Int. Agric. 44:26789 [Google Scholar]
  108. Pray CE, Huang J, Hu R, Rozelle S. 2002. Five years of Bt cotton in China—the benefits continue. Plant J. 31:42330 [Google Scholar]
  109. Pray CE, Ma D, Huang J, Qiao F. 2001. Impact of Bt cotton in China. World Dev. 29:81325 [Google Scholar]
  110. Pray CE, Ramaswami B, Huang J, Bengali P, Hu R, Zhang H. 2006. Costs and enforcement of biosafety regulation in India and China. Int. J. Technol. Glob. 2:13757 [Google Scholar]
  111. Price GK, Lin W, Falck-Zepeda JB, Fernandez-Cornejo J. 2003. The size and distribution of market benefits from adopting agricultural biotechnology. Tech. Bull. 1906, US Dep. Agric., Washington, DC [Google Scholar]
  112. Qaim M. 2001. A prospective evaluation of biotechnology in semi-subsistence agriculture. Agric. Econ. 25:16575 [Google Scholar]
  113. Qaim M. 2003. Bt cotton in India: field trial results and economic projections. World Dev. 31:211527 [Google Scholar]
  114. Qaim M. 2005. Agricultural biotechnology adoption in developing countries. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 87:131724 [Google Scholar]
  115. Qaim M, de Janvry A. 2005. Bt cotton and pesticide use in Argentina: economic and environmental effects. Environ. Dev. Econ. 10:179200 [Google Scholar]
  116. Qaim M, de Janvry A. 2003. Genetically modified crops, corporate pricing strategies, and farmers’ adoption: the case of Bt cotton in Argentina. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 85:81428 [Google Scholar]
  117. Qaim M, Krattiger AF, von Braun J. 2000. Agricultural Biotechnology in Developing Countries: Towards Optimizing the Benefits for the Poor New York: Kluwer [Google Scholar]
  118. Qaim M, Pray CE, Zilberman D. 2008. Economic and social considerations in the adoption of Bt crops. See Romeis et al. 12:32956 [Google Scholar]
  119. Qaim M, Stein AJ, Meenakshi JV. 2007. Economics of biofortification. Agric. Econ. 37:(Suppl. 1)11933 [Google Scholar]
  120. Qaim M, Subramanian A, Naik G, Zilberman D. 2006. Adoption of Bt cotton and impact variability: insights from India. Rev. Agric. Econ. 28:4858 [Google Scholar]
  121. Qaim M, Traxler G. 2005. Roundup Ready soybeans in Argentina: farm level and aggregate welfare effects. Agric. Econ. 32:7386 [Google Scholar]
  122. Qaim M, Zilberman D. 2003. Yield effects of genetically modified crops in developing countries. Science 299:9002 [Google Scholar]
  123. Rajagopal D, Sexton S, Hochman G, Zilberman D. 2009. Recent developments in renewable technologies: R&D investment in advanced biofuels. Annu. Rev. Resour. Econ. 1:62144 [Google Scholar]
  124. Ramasamy C, Selvaraj KN, Norton GW, Vijayaraghavan K. 2007. Economic and Environmental Benefits and Costs of Transgenic Crops: Ex-Ante Assessment Coimbatore: Tamil Nadu Agric. Univ. [Google Scholar]
  125. Rausser G, Simon L, Ameden H. 2000. Public-private alliances in biotechnology: Can they narrow the knowledge gaps between rich and poor. Food Policy 25:499513 [Google Scholar]
  126. Romeis J, Shelton AS, Kennedy GG. 2008. Integration of Insect-Resistant Genetically Modified Crops within IPM Programs New York: Springer [Google Scholar]
  127. Sadashivappa P, Qaim M. 2009. Effects of Bt cotton in India during the first five years of adoption Presented at Int. Assoc. Agric. Econ. Triennial Conf. Beijing, China: [Google Scholar]
  128. Santaniello V, Evenson RE, Zilberman D, Carlson GA. 2000. Agriculture and Intellectual Property Rights: Economic, Institutional and Implementation Issues in Biotechnology Oxfordshire, UK: CABI Publ. [Google Scholar]
  129. Sexton SE, Lei Z, Zilberman D. 2007. The economics of pesticides and pest control. Int. Rev. Environ. Resour. Econ. 1:27126 [Google Scholar]
  130. Sharma D. 2004. GM Food and Hunger: A View from the South New Delhi: Forum Biotechnol. Food Secur. [Google Scholar]
  131. Shelton AM, Fuchs M, Shotoski FA. 2008. Transgenic vegetables and fruits for control of insects and insect-vectored pathogens. See Romeis et al. 9:24971 [Google Scholar]
  132. Shelton AM, Naranjo SE, Romeis J, Hellmich RL, Wolt JD et al. 2009. Setting the record straight: a rebuttal to an erroneous analysis on transgenic insecticidal crops and natural enemies. Transgenic Res. In press. doi: 10.1007/s11248-009-9260-5 [Google Scholar]
  133. Stein AJ, Sachdev HPS, Qaim M. 2006. Potential impact and cost-effectiveness of Golden Rice. Nat. Biotechnol. 24:12001 [Google Scholar]
  134. Stein AJ, Sachdev HPS, Qaim M. 2008. Genetic engineering for the poor: Golden Rice and public health in India. World Dev. 36:14458 [Google Scholar]
  135. Subramanian A, Qaim M. 2009a. The impact of Bt cotton on poor households in rural India. J. Dev. Stud. In press [Google Scholar]
  136. Subramanian A, Qaim M. 2009b. Village-wide effects of agricultural biotechnology: the case of Bt cotton in India. World Dev. 37:25667 [Google Scholar]
  137. Thirtle C, Beyers L, Ismael Y, Piesse J. 2003. Can GM-technologies help the poor? The impact of Bt cotton in Makhathini Flats, KwaZulu-Natal. World Dev. 31:71732 [Google Scholar]
  138. Tothova M, Oehmke JF. 2005. Whom to join? The small-country dilemma in adopting GM crops in a fragmented trade environment. Q. J. Int. Agric. 44:291310 [Google Scholar]
  139. Traxler G, Godoy-Avila S, Falck-Zepeda J, Espinoza-Arellano J. 2003. Transgenic cotton in Mexico: a case study of the Comarca Lagunera. See Kalaitzandonakes 2003 10:183202 [Google Scholar]
  140. Trigo EJ, Cap EJ. 2006. Ten Years of Genetically Modified Crops in Argentine Agriculture Buenos Aires: Argent. Counc. Inf. Dev. Biotechnol. [Google Scholar]
  141. Unnevehr L, Pray C, Paarlberg R. 2007. Addressing micronutrient deficiencies: alternative interventions and technologies. AgBioForum 10:12434 [Google Scholar]
  142. von Braun J. 2007. The world food situation: new driving forces and required actions Food Policy Rep. 18 Int. Food Policy Res. Inst. Washington, DC: [Google Scholar]
  143. Wang S, Just D, Pinstrup-Andersen P. 2006. Tarnishing silver bullets: Bt technology adoption, bounded rationality and the outbreak of secondary pest infestations in China Presented at Am. Agric. Econ. Assoc. Annu. Meet. Long Beach, Calif.: [Google Scholar]
  144. Weaver S, Morris M. 2005. Risks associated with genetic modification: an annotated bibliography of peer-reviewed natural science publications. J. Agric. Environ. Ethics 18:15789 [Google Scholar]
  145. Wu F. 2002. Bt or not Bt? Tools for regulatory decisions concerning genetically modified corn PhD thesis Eng. Public Policy Carnegie Mellon Univ.: [Google Scholar]
  146. Wu F. 2006. Bt corn's reduction of mycotoxins: regulatory decisions and public opinion. See Just et al. 2006 9:179200 [Google Scholar]
  147. Yorobe JM Jr, Quicoy CB. 2006. Economic impact of Bt corn in the Philippines. Philipp. Agric. Sci. 89:25867 [Google Scholar]
  148. Zilberman D, Ameden H, Graff G, Qaim M. 2004. Agricultural biotechnology: productivity, biodiversity, and intellectual property rights. J. Agric. Food. Ind. Organ. 2:(2) artic. 3 [Google Scholar]
  149. Zilberman D, Ameden H, Qaim M. 2007. The impact of agricultural biotechnology on yields, risks, and biodiversity in low-income countries. J. Dev. Stud. 43:6378 [Google Scholar]
  150. Zimmermann R, Qaim M. 2004. Potential health benefits of Golden Rice: a Philippine case study. Food Policy 29:14768 [Google Scholar]

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error