1932

Abstract

The literature on real options shows that irreversibilities, uncertainties about future benefits and costs, and the flexibility in decision making generate benefits and costs of delaying immediate action. When applied to government policy making, real option models can lead to efficient policies that take full account of these trade-offs, but they can also cause strategic behavior that tries to delay policies through influencing important elements such as downside risks. This contribution reviews the latest developments in real option–based policy research by looking at what we know about the benefits from waiting (the good), the costs from waiting (the bad), and how strategic behavior can influence policies (the ugly). Much has been said in the literature about the good and the bad, but more work is needed to study the ugly aspects of real option–driven policies.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-resource-100518-094140
2019-10-05
2025-04-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/resource/11/1/annurev-resource-100518-094140.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-resource-100518-094140&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Ansar A, Flyvbjerg B, Budzier A, Lunn D 2014. Should we build more large dams? The actual costs of hydropower megaproject development. Energy Policy 6943–56
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Arkes HR, Blumer C. 1985. The psychology of sunk cost. Organ. Behav. Hum. Dec. 35124–40
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Arrow K, Cropper ML, Eads GC, Hahn RW, Lave LB et al. 1996. Is there a role for benefit-cost analysis in environmental, health, and safety regulation. Science 272221–22
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Arrow KJ, Dasgupta P, Goulder LH, Mumford KJ, Oleson K 2012. Sustainability and the measurement of wealth. Environ. Dev. Econ. 173317–53
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Arrow KJ, Fisher AC. 1974. Environmental preservation, uncertainty and irreversibility. Q. J. Econ. 882312–19
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Baldursson FM, von der Fehr N-HM 2004. Prices versus quantities: the irrelevance of irreversibility. Scand. J. Econ. 1064805–21
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Balikcioglu M, Fackler PL, Pindyck RS 2011. Solving optimal timing problems in environmental economics. Resour. Energy Econ. 33761–68
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Beckmann V, Soregaroli C, Wesseler JHH 2010. Ex-ante regulation and ex-post liability under uncertainty and irreversibility: governing the coexistence of GM crops. Economics 42010-9
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Benjamin EO, Grabenweger G, Strasser H, Wesseler JHH 2018. The socioeconomic benefits of biological control of western corn rootworm Diabrotica virgifera virgifera and wireworms Agriotes spp. in maize and potatoes for selected European countries. J. Plant Dis. Prot. 1253273–85
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Benjamin EO, Wesseler JHH. 2016. A socioeconomic analysis of biocontrol in integrated pest management: a review of the effects of uncertainty, irreversibility and flexibility. NJAS 7753–60
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Biancardi M, Villani G. 2017. A fuzzy approach for R&D compound option valuation. Fuzzy Sets Syst 310108–21
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Bloom N. 2009. The impact of uncertainty shocks. Econometrica 77623–85
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Boomsma TK, Meade N, Fleten S-E 2012. Renewable energy investments under different support schemes: a real options approach. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 220225–37
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Brekke KA, Oksendal B. 1994. Optimal switching in an economic activity under uncertainty. SIAM J. Control Optim. 321021–36
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Brookes G, Barfoot P. 2017. Environmental impacts of genetically modified (GM) crop use 1996–2015: impacts on pesticide use and carbon emissions. GM Crops Food 82117–47
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Buurman J, Babovic V. 2016. Adaptation pathways and real options analysis: an approach to deep uncertainty in climate change adaptation policies. Policy Soc 35137–50
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Carey JM, Zilberman D. 2002. A model of investment under uncertainty: modern irrigation technology and emerging markets in water. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 841171–83
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Carlsson C, Fuller R. 2003. A fuzzy approach to real option valuation. Fuzzy Sets Syst 139297–312
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Coase R. 1960. The problem of social cost. J. Law Econ. 31–44
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Collan M, Fullér R, Mezei J 2009. A fuzzy pay-off method for real option valuation. J. Appl. Math. Decis. Sci. 2009238196
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Corrigan JR, Kling CL, Zhao J 2008. Willingness to pay and the cost of commitment: an empirical specification and test. Environ. Resour. Econ. 40285–98
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Dangerfield CE, Whalley AE, Hanley N, Gilligan CA 2017. What a difference a stochastic process makes: epidemiological-based real options models of optimal treatment of disease. Environ. Resour. Econ. 70691–711
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Demers M. 1991. Investment under uncertainty, irreversibility and the arrival of information over time. Rev. Econ. Stud. 58333–50
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Demont M, Wesseler J, Tollens E 2004. Biodiversity versus transgenic sugar beets: the one Euro question. Eur. Rev. Agric. Econ. 3111–18
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Demont M, Wesseler J, Tollens E 2005. Irreversible costs and benefits of transgenic crops: What are they. Environmental Costs and Benefits of Transgenic Crops JHH Wesseler113–22 Dordrecht, Neth.: Springer
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Dittrich R, Wreford A, Moran D 2016. A survey of decision-making approaches for climate change adaptation: Are robust methods the way forward. Ecol. Econ. 12279–89
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Dixit AK. 1989. Entry and exit decisions under uncertainty. J. Political Econ. 973620–38
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Dixit AK. 1992. Investment and hysteresis. J. Econ. Persp. 61107–32
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Dixit AK. 1996. The Making of Economic Policy: A Transaction-Cost Politics Perspective Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Dixit AK, Pindyck RS. 1994. Investment Under Uncertainty Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Eberly J, Rebelo S, Vincent N 2012. What explains the lagged-investment effect. J. Mon. Econ. 594370–80
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Epstein LG. 1980. Decision making and the temporal resolution of uncertainty. Int. Econ. Rev. 21269–83
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Fisher AC. 2000a. Introduction to special issue on irreversibility. Resour. Energy Econ. 22189–96
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Fisher AC. 2000b. Investment under uncertainty and option value in environmental economics. Resour. Energy Econ. 22197–204
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Fisher AC, Narain U. 2003. Global warming, endogenous risk, and irreversibility. Environ. Resour. Econ. 25395–416
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Frederiks C, Wesseler JHH. 2019. A comparison of the EU and US regulatory frameworks for the active substance registration of microbial biological control agents. Pest Manag. Sci. 7587–103
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Freixas X, Laffont JJ. 1984. On the irreversibility effect. Bayesian Models in Economic Theory M Boyer, R Kihlstrom105–14 Dordrecht, Neth.: North-Holland
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Friedman D, Pommerenke K, Lukose R, Milam G, Huberman BA 2007. Searching for the sunk cost fallacy. Exp. Econ. 1079–104
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Grenadier SR. 1996. The strategic exercise of options: development cascades and overbuilding in real estate markets. J. Finance 511653–79
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Grenadier SR. 2002. Option exercise games: an application to the equilibrium investment strategies of firms. Rev. Financ. Stud. 15691–721
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Grenadier SR, Wang N. 2007. Investment under uncertainty and time-inconsistent preferences. J. Financ. Econ. 842–39
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Hanemann WM. 1989. Information and the concept of option value. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 1623–37
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Hayek F. 1944. The Road to Serfdom London: Routledge
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Henry C. 1974. Investment decision under uncertainty: the irreversibility effect. Am. Econ. Rev. 641006–12
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Herring R, Paarlberg R. 2016. The political economy of biotechnology. Annu. Rev. Resour. Econ. 8397–416
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Hüttel S, Musshoff O, Odening M 2010. Investment reluctance: irreversibility or imperfect capital markets. Eur. Rev. Agric. Econ. 37151–76
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Jones RA, Ostroy JM. 1984. Flexibility and uncertainty. Rev. Econ. Stud. 5113–32
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Kahneman D. 2012. Thinking, Fast and Slow New York: Farrar, Straus, & Giroux
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Kang SB, Létourneau P. 2016. Investors’ reaction to the government credibility problem: a real option analysis of emission permit policy risk. Energy Econ 5496–107
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Karp L. 2005. Global warming and hyperbolic discounting. J. Publ. Econ. 89261–82
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Kellogg R. 2014. The effect of uncertainty on investment: evidence from Texas oil drilling. Am. Econ. Rev. 1041698–734
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Kikulwe E, Falck-Zepeda J, Wesseler JHH 2014. Incremental benefits of genetically modified bananas in Uganda. Handbook on Agriculture, Biotechnology and Development D Castle, P Phillips, S Smyth 793–807 Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Kim K, Park H, Kim H 2017. Real options analysis for renewable energy investment decisions in developing countries. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 75918–26
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Kim K-T, Lee D-J, Pak S-J 2014. Evaluation of R&D investments in windpower in Korea using real option. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 40335–47
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Kitzing L, Juul N, Drud M, Boomsma TK 2017. A real options approach to analyse wind energy investments under different support schemes. Appl. Energy 18883–96
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Kling CL, List JA, Zhao J 2013. A dynamic explanation of the willingness to pay and willingness to accept disparity. Econ. Inq. 51909–21
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Kolstad CD. 1996a. Fundamental irreversibilities in stock externalities. J. Publ. Econ. 60221–33
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Kolstad CD. 1996b. Learning and stock effects in environmental regulations: the case of greenhouse gas emissions. J. Environ. Econ. Mang. 311–18
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Kolstad CD, Ulen TS, Johnson GV 1990. Ex post liability for harm versus ex ante safety regulation: substitutes or compliments. Am. Econ. Rev. 80888–90
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Kozlova M. 2017. Real option valuation in renewable energy literature: research focus, trends and design. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 80180–96
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Krueger AO. 1997. Trade policy and economic development: how we learn. Am. Econ. Rev. 871–22
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Lee S-C, Shih L-H. 2010. Renewable energy policy evaluation using real option model—the case of Taiwan. Energy Econ 32S67–78
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Leitzel L, Weisman E. 1999. Investing in policy reform. J. Inst. Theor. Econ. 1554696–709
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Lemoine DM. 2010. Valuing plug-in hybrid electric vehicles’ battery capacity using a real options framework. Energy J 31113–43
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Leroux AD, Martin VL, Goeschl T 2009. Optimal conservation, extinction debt, and the augmented quasi-option value. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 5843–57
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Leroux AD, Whitten SM. 2014. Optimal investment in ecological rehabilitation under climate change. Ecol. Econ. 107133–44
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Lin TT, Ko C-C, Yeh H-N 2007. Applying real options in investment decisions relating to environmental pollution. Energy Policy 352426–32
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Loncar D, Milovanovic I, Rakic B, Radjenovic T 2017. Compound real options valuation of renewable energy projects: the case of a wind farm in Serbia. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 75354–67
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Lukach R, Kort PM, Plasmans J 2007. Optimal R&D investment strategies under the threat of new technology entry. Int. J. Ind. Organ. 25103–19
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Markel E, Sims C, English BC 2018. Policy uncertainty and the optimal investment decisions of second-generation biofuel producers. Energy Econ 7689–100
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Maxwell C, Davison M. 2014. Using real option analysis to quantify ethanol policy impact on the firm's entry into and optimal operation of corn ethanol facilities. Energy Econ 42140–51
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Mbah MLN, Forster GA, Wesseler JHH, Gilligan CA 2010. Economically optimal timing for crop disease control under uncertainty: an options approach. J. R. Soc. Interface 71421–28
    [Google Scholar]
  73. McAfee RP, Mialon HM, Mialon SH 2010. Do sunk costs matter. Econ. Inq. 48323–36
    [Google Scholar]
  74. McDonald R, Siegel D. 1985. Investment and the valuation of firms when there is an option to shut down. Int. Econ. Rev. 26331–49
    [Google Scholar]
  75. McDonald R, Siegel D. 1986. The value of waiting to invest. Q. J. Econ. 101707–27
    [Google Scholar]
  76. Megiddo I, Drabik D, Bedford T, Morton A, Wesseler JHH, Laxminarayan R 2019. Investing in antibiotics to alleviate future catastrophic outcomes: what is the value of having an effective antibiotic to mitigate pandemic influenza. Health Econ 284556–71
    [Google Scholar]
  77. Merton RC. 1998. Applications of option-pricing theory: twenty-five years later. Am. Econ. Rev. 883323–49
    [Google Scholar]
  78. Mezey EW, Conrad JM. 2010. Real options in resource economics. Annu. Rev. Resour. Econ. 233–52
    [Google Scholar]
  79. Narain U, Hanemann M, Fisher A 2007. The irreversibility effect in environmental decision making. Environ. Resour. Econ. 38391–405
    [Google Scholar]
  80. Park H. 2012. Real option analysis for effects of emission permit banking on investment under abatement cost uncertainty. Econ. Model. 291314–21
    [Google Scholar]
  81. Perrings C, Brock W. 2009. Irreversibility in economics. Annu. Rev. Resour. Econ. 1219–38
    [Google Scholar]
  82. Pindyck RS. 2000. Irreversibilities and the timing of environmental policy. Resour. Energy Econ. 223233–59
    [Google Scholar]
  83. Purnhagen K. 2015. The EU's precautionary principle in food law is an information tool!. Eur. Bus. Law Rev. 6903–21
    [Google Scholar]
  84. Purnhagen KP, Wesseler JHH. 2019. Maximum versus minimum harmonization: what to expect from the institutional and legal battles in the EU on gene editing technologies.. Pest Manag. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.5367
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  85. Richards TJ, Green JP. 2003. Economic hysteresis in variety selection. J. Agric. Appl. Econ. 3511–14
    [Google Scholar]
  86. Richards TJ, Patterson PM. 1998. Hysteresis and the shortage of agricultural labor. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 804683–95
    [Google Scholar]
  87. Santos L, Soares I, Mendes C, Ferreira P 2014. Real options versus traditional methods to assess renewable energy projects. Renew. Energy 68588–94
    [Google Scholar]
  88. Schmit TM, Luo J, Conrad JM 2011. Estimating the influence of US ethanol policy on plant investment decisions: a real options analysis with two stochastic variables. Energy Econ 331194–205
    [Google Scholar]
  89. Schmit TM, Luo J, Tauer LW 2009. Ethanol plant investment using net present value and real options analyses. Biomass Bioenergy 331442–51
    [Google Scholar]
  90. Shao Q, Punt M, Wesseler JHH 2018. New plant breeding techniques under food security pressure and lobbying. Front. Plant Sci. 91324
    [Google Scholar]
  91. Shavell S. 1984. A model of the optimal use of liability and safety regulation. RAND J. Econ. 15271–80
    [Google Scholar]
  92. Shleifer A. 2010. Efficient regulation. Regulation Versus Litigation: Perspectives from Economics and Law DP Kessler 27–44 Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press
    [Google Scholar]
  93. Siddiqui A, Fleten S-E. 2010. How to proceed with competing alternative energy technologies: a real options analysis. Energy Econ 32817–30
    [Google Scholar]
  94. Sims C, Finnoff D. 2012. The role of spatial scale in the timing of uncertain environmental policy. J. Econ. Dyn. Control 36369–82
    [Google Scholar]
  95. Smart RD, Blum M, Wesseler JHH 2017. Trends in genetically engineered crops’ approval times in the United States and the European Union. J. Agric. Econ. 681182–98
    [Google Scholar]
  96. Smit HTJ, Trigeorgis L. 2004. Strategic Investment: Real Options and Games Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  97. Smyth SJ, Kerr WA, Phillips PWB 2017. Biotechnology Regulation and Trade New York: Springer
    [Google Scholar]
  98. Soregaroli C, Wesseler JHH. 2005. Minimum distance requirements and liability: implications for coexistence. Environmental Costs and Benefits of Transgenic Crops JHH Wesseler 165–82 Dordrecht, Neth.: Springer
    [Google Scholar]
  99. Sweis BM, Abram SV, Schmidt BJ, Seeland KD, MacDonald AW 3rd et al. 2018. Sensitivity to “sunk costs” in mice, rats, and humans. Science 361178–81
    [Google Scholar]
  100. Tandja MDC, Power GJ, Bastien J 2018. Real option valuation in a Gollier/Weitzman world: the effect of long-run discount rate uncertainty. Energy J 39521–53
    [Google Scholar]
  101. Torani K, Rausser G, Zilberman D 2016. Innovation subsidies versus consumer subsidies: a real options analysis of solar energy. Energy Policy 92255–69
    [Google Scholar]
  102. Tosun J, Schaub S. 2017. Mobilization in the European public sphere: the struggle over genetically modified organisms. Rev. Policy Res. 343310–30
    [Google Scholar]
  103. Trigeorgis L. 1996. Real Options Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
    [Google Scholar]
  104. Weaver R, Wesseler JHH. 2005. Monopolistic pricing power for transgenic crops when technology adopters face irreversible benefits and costs. Appl. Econ. Lett. 11969–73
    [Google Scholar]
  105. Wesseler JHH. 2009. The Santaniello theorem of irreversible benefits. AgBioForum 1218–13
    [Google Scholar]
  106. Wesseler JHH, Scatasta S, Nillesen E 2007. The Maximum Incremental Social Tolerable Irreversible Costs (MISTICs) and other benefits and costs of introducing transgenic maize in the EU-15. Pedobiologia 513261–69
    [Google Scholar]
  107. Wesseler JHH, Smart RD, Thomson J, Zilberman D 2017. Foregone benefits of important food crop improvements in Sub-Saharan Africa. PLOS ONE 127e0181353
    [Google Scholar]
  108. Wesseler JHH, Zilberman D. 2014. The economic power of the golden rice opposition. Environ. Dev. Econ. 196724–42
    [Google Scholar]
  109. Whitten SM, Hertzler G, Strunz S 2012. How real options and ecological resilience thinking can assist in environmental risk management. J. Risk Res. 153331–46
    [Google Scholar]
  110. Wilmott P, Howison S, Dewynne J 1995. The Mathematics of Financial Derivatives Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  111. Wirl F. 2006. Consequences of irreversibilities on optimal intertemporal CO2 emission policies under uncertainty. Resour. Energy Econ. 28105–23
    [Google Scholar]
  112. Zhang K, Kleit AN. 2016. Mining rate optimization considering the stockpiling: a theoretical economics and real option model. Resour. Policy 4787–94
    [Google Scholar]
  113. Zhang M, Zhou D, Zhou P 2014. A real option model for renewable energy policy evaluation with application to solar PV power generation in China. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 40944–55
    [Google Scholar]
  114. Zhao J. 2003. Irreversible abatement investment under cost uncertainties: tradable emission permits and emissions charges. J. Publ. Econ. 872765–89
    [Google Scholar]
  115. Zhao J, Kling CL. 2001. A new explanation for the WTP/WTA disparity. Econ. Lett. 73293–300
    [Google Scholar]
  116. Zhao J, Kling CL. 2003. Policy persistence in environmental regulation. Resour. Energy Econ. 25255–68
    [Google Scholar]
  117. Zhao J, Kling CL. 2004. Willingness to pay, compensating variation, and the cost of commitment. Econ. Inq. 42503–17
    [Google Scholar]
  118. Zhao J, Kling CL. 2009. Welfare measures when agents can learn: a unifying theory. Econ. J. 1191560–85
    [Google Scholar]
  119. Zhao J, Zilberman D. 1999. Irreversibility and restoration in natural resource development. Oxf. Econ. Pap. 51559–73
    [Google Scholar]
  120. Zhao J, Zilberman D. 2001. Fixed costs, efficient resource management, and conservation. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 834942–57
    [Google Scholar]
  121. Zilberman D, Kaplan S, Wesseler JHH 2015. The loss from underutilizing GM technologies. AgBioForum 183312–19
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-resource-100518-094140
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-resource-100518-094140
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error