1932

Abstract

Land-use change is a leading cause of environmental degradation in terrestrial systems and has important implications for natural resource use. Economists have a long tradition of studying land use and in recent decades have developed empirical land-use models using econometric and optimization approaches. Integration of these land-use and biophysical models allows for a more comprehensive analysis of the consequences of future land-use change and the use of land-use policies to avoid undesirable outcomes. I provide a conceptual framework for the modeling approach, describing the individual components of an analysis as well as how they are linked together. My review describes how the literature has evolved to take advantage of spatial data and greater computing capabilities. Although most researchers have used either an econometric or an optimization approach, there is potential to combine these methods to identify more efficient land-use policies that still meet criteria of tractability and political acceptance.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-resource-100814-125056
2015-10-05
2024-06-17
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/resource/7/1/annurev-resource-100814-125056.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-resource-100814-125056&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Adams DM, Alig RJ, Callaway JM, McCarl BA, Winnett SM. 1996.The Forest and Agricultural Sector Optimization Model (FASOM): model structure and policy applications. Res. Pap. PNW-RP-495, For. Serv., Pac. Northwest Res. Stn., US Dep. Agric., Portland, Or.
  2. Alig R, Adams D, McCarl B, Callaway JM, Winnett S. 1997. Assessing effects of mitigation strategies for global climate change with an intertemporal model of the U.S. forest and agriculture sectors. Environ. Resour. Econ. 9:259–74 [Google Scholar]
  3. Alonso W. 1964. Location and Land Use Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  4. Ando A, Camm J, Polasky S, Solow A. 1998. Species distributions, land values, and efficient conservation. Science 279:2126–28 [Google Scholar]
  5. Bateman IJ, Harwood AR, Mace GM, Watson RT, Abson DJ et al. 2013. Bringing ecosystem services into economic decision-making: land use in the United Kingdom. Science 341:45–50 [Google Scholar]
  6. Beaudry F, Radeloff VC, Pidgeon AM, Plantinga AJ, Lewis DJ et al. 2013. The loss of forest birds habitats under different land use policies as projected by a coupled ecological-econometric model. Biol. Conserv. 165:1–9 [Google Scholar]
  7. Bigelow D, Plantinga AJ, Lewis DJ, Langpap C. 2014. Urban development and water use. Presented at “Land Use and Ecosystem Services Provision” Worksh., May 1–2, Univ. Calif., Santa Barbara
  8. Bockstael NE. 1996. Modeling economics and ecology: the importance of a spatial perspective. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 78:51168–80 [Google Scholar]
  9. Butsic V, Lewis DJ, Radeloff VC. 2010. Lakeshore zoning has heterogeneous ecological effects: an application of a coupled economic-ecological model. Ecol. Appl. 20:3867–79 [Google Scholar]
  10. Carrion-Flores C, Irwin EG. 2004. Determinants of residential land-use conversion and sprawl at the rural-urban fringe. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 86:4889–904 [Google Scholar]
  11. Church R, Stoms D, Davis F. 1996. Reserve selection as a maximal coverage location problem. Biol. Conserv. 76:2105–12 [Google Scholar]
  12. Clarke KC, Gaydos LJ. 1998. Loose-coupling a cellular automaton model and GIS: long-term urban growth prediction for San Francisco and Washington/Baltimore. Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 12:7699–714 [Google Scholar]
  13. Costello C, Polasky S. 2004. Dynamic reserve site selection. Resour. Energy Econ. 26:157–74 [Google Scholar]
  14. Dai Y, Zeng X, Dickinson R, Baker I, Bonan G et al. 2003. The Common Land Model (CLM). Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 84:1013–23 [Google Scholar]
  15. De Pinto A, Nelson GC. 2009. Land use change with spatially explicit data: a dynamic approach. Environ. Resour. Econ. 42:209–29 [Google Scholar]
  16. Dempsey JA, Plantinga AJ, Alig RJ. 2010. What explains differences in the costs of carbon sequestration in forests? A review of alternative cost methodologies. Economic Modeling of Effects of Climate Change on the Forest Sector and Mitigation Options: A Compendium of Briefing Papers, Gen. Tech. Rep. PNW-GTR-833 Washington, DC: US Dep. Agric [Google Scholar]
  17. Fezzi C, Bateman IJ. 2011. Structural agricultural land use modeling for spatial agro-environmental policy analysis. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 93:41168–88 [Google Scholar]
  18. Fischer DT, Church RL. 2003. Clustering and compactness in reserve site selection: an extension of the biodiversity management area selection model. For. Sci. 49:4555–65 [Google Scholar]
  19. Hardie IW, Parks PJ. 1997. Land use with heterogeneous land quality: an application of an area base model. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 79:299–310 [Google Scholar]
  20. Hey DL, Philippi NS. 1995. Flood reduction through wetland restoration: the Upper Mississippi River Basin as a case history. Restor. Ecol. 3:14–17 [Google Scholar]
  21. Jian AK, Khanna M, Erickson M, Huang H. 2010. An integrated biogeochemical and economic analysis of bioenergy crops in the Midwestern United States. Glob. Change Biol. Bioenergy 2:217–34 [Google Scholar]
  22. Johnson SL, Adams RM, Perry GM. 1991. The on-farm costs of reducing groundwater pollution. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 73:41063–73 [Google Scholar]
  23. Khanna M, Chen X, Huang H, Onal H. 2011. Supply of cellulosic biofuel feedstocks and regional production pattern. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 93:2473–80 [Google Scholar]
  24. Lawler J, Lewis D, Nelson E, Plantinga AJ, Polasky S et al. 2014. Projected land-use change impacts on ecosystem services in the U.S. PNAS 111:207492–97 [Google Scholar]
  25. Lewis DJ, Plantinga AJ. 2007. Policies for habitat fragmentation: combining econometrics with GIS-based landscape simulations. Land Econ. 83:2109–27 [Google Scholar]
  26. Lewis DJ, Plantinga AJ, Nelson E, Polasky S. 2011. The efficiency of voluntary incentive policies for preventing biodiversity loss. Resour. Energy Econ. 33:1192–211 [Google Scholar]
  27. Lichtenberg E. 1989. Land quality, irrigation development, and cropping patterns in the Northern High Plains. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 71:187–94 [Google Scholar]
  28. Loveland TR, Sohl TL, Stehman SV, Gallant AL, Sayler KL, Napton DE. 2002. A strategy for estimating the rates of recent United States land cover changes. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 68:101091–99 [Google Scholar]
  29. Lubowski RN, Plantinga AJ, Stavins RN. 2006a. Land-use change and carbon sinks: econometric estimation of the carbon sequestration supply function. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 51:2135–52 [Google Scholar]
  30. Lubowski RN, Vesterby M, Bucholtz S, Baez A, Roberts MJ. 2006b. Major uses of land in the United States, 2002. Econ. Inf. Bull. 14, Econ. Res. Serv., US Dep. Agric.
  31. Mason CF, Plantinga AJ. 2013. The additionality problem with offsets: optimal contracts for carbon sequestration in forests. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 66:1–14 [Google Scholar]
  32. Matthews S, O’Connor R, Plantinga AJ. 2002. Quantifying the impacts on biodiversity of policies for carbon sequestration in forests. Ecol. Econ. 40:171–87 [Google Scholar]
  33. McGarigal K, Cushman SA, Ene E. 2012. FRAGSTATS: spatial pattern analysis program for categorical maps. Softw. Prog., Version 4, Univ. Mass., Amherst. http://www.umass.edu/landeco/research/fragstats/fragstats.html
  34. Miller DJ, Plantinga AJ. 1999. Modeling land use decisions with aggregate data. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 81:180–94 [Google Scholar]
  35. Montgomery CA, Brown GM Jr., Adams DM. 1994. The marginal cost of species preservation: the northern spotted owl. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 26:111–28 [Google Scholar]
  36. Nalle DJ, Montgomery CA, Arthur JL, Polasky S, Schumaker NH. 2004. Modeling joint production of wildlife and timber. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 48:3997–1017 [Google Scholar]
  37. Nelson E, Polasky S, Lewis DJ, Plantinga AJ, Lonsdorf E et al. 2008. Efficiency of incentives to jointly increase carbon sequestration and species conservation on a landscape. PNAS 105:289471–76 [Google Scholar]
  38. Newburn DA, Berck P, Merenlender MA. 2006. Habitat and open space at risk of land-use conversion: targeting strategies for land conservation. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 88:128–42 [Google Scholar]
  39. Nicholson E, Westphal MI, Frank K, Rochester WA, Pressey RL et al. 2006. A new method for conservation planning for the persistence of multiple species. Ecol. Lett. 9:1049–60 [Google Scholar]
  40. Onal H, Briers RA. 2003. Selection of a minimum boundary reserve network using integer programming. Proc. R. Soc. B 270:1487–91 [Google Scholar]
  41. Patz JA, Campbell-Lendrum D, Holloway T, Foley JA. 2005. Impact of regional climate change on human health. Nature 438:310–17 [Google Scholar]
  42. Patz JA, Daszak P, Tabor GM, Aguirre AA, Pearl M et al. 2004. Unhealthy landscapes: policy recommendations on land use change and infectious disease emergence. Environ. Health Perspect. 112:1092–98 [Google Scholar]
  43. Plantinga AJ. 1996. The effect of agricultural policies on land use and environmental quality. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 78:1082–91 [Google Scholar]
  44. Plantinga AJ, Ahn S. 2002. Efficient policies for environmental protection: an econometric analysis of incentives for land conversion and retention. J. Agric. Resour. Econ. 27:1128–45 [Google Scholar]
  45. Plantinga AJ, Lewis DJ. 2014. Landscape simulations with econometric-based land-use models. The Oxford Handbook of Land Economics Duke JM, Wu J. 380–401 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  46. Plantinga AJ, Mauldin T, Miller DJ. 1999. An econometric analysis of the costs of sequestering carbon in forests. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 81:812–24 [Google Scholar]
  47. Plantinga AJ, Wu J. 2003. Co-benefits from carbon sequestration in forests: evaluating reductions in agricultural externalities from an afforestation policy in Wisconsin. Land Econ. 79:174–85 [Google Scholar]
  48. Polasky S, Camm JD, Garber-Yonts B. 2001. Selecting biological reserves cost-effectively: an application to terrestrial vertebrate conservation in Oregon. Land Econ. 77:168–78 [Google Scholar]
  49. Polasky S, Nelson E, Camm J, Csuti B, Fackler P et al. 2008. Where to put things? Spatial land management to sustain biodiversity and economic production. Biol. Conserv. 141:61505–24 [Google Scholar]
  50. Rabotyagov S, Campbell T, Jha M, Gassman PW, Arnold J et al. 2010. Least-cost control of agricultural nutrient contributions to the Gulf of Mexico hypoxic zone. Ecol. Appl. 20:61542–55 [Google Scholar]
  51. Rabotyagov S, Valcu AM, Kling CL. 2014. Reversing property rights: practice-based approaches for controlling agricultural nonpoint-source water pollution when emissions aggregate nonlinearly. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 96:2397–419 [Google Scholar]
  52. Rust J. 1987. Optimal replacement of GMC bus engines: an empirical model of Harold Zurcher. Econometrica 55:999–1033 [Google Scholar]
  53. Sala OE, Chapin FS, Armesto JJ, Berlow E, Bloomfield J et al. 2000. Global biodiversity scenarios in the year 2100. Science 287:1770–74 [Google Scholar]
  54. Schlosser IJ. 1991. Stream fish ecology: a landscape perspective. BioScience 41:10704–12 [Google Scholar]
  55. Simon D. 2013. Evolutionary Optimization Algorithms Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons [Google Scholar]
  56. Stavins R. 1999. The costs of carbon sequestration: a revealed-preference approach. Am. Econ. Rev. 89:4994–1009 [Google Scholar]
  57. Stavins RN, Jaffe AB. 1990. Unintended impacts of public investments on private decisions: the depletion of forested wetlands. Am. Econ. Rev. 80:3337–52 [Google Scholar]
  58. Stone B Jr., Rodgers MO. 2001. Urban form and thermal efficiency: how the design of cities influences the urban heat island effect. J. Am. Plann. Assoc. 67:2186–98 [Google Scholar]
  59. Strange N, Thorsen BJ, Bladt J. 2006. Optimal reserve selection in a dynamic world. Biol. Conserv. 131:33–41 [Google Scholar]
  60. Syphard AD, Radeloff VC, Keeley JE, Hawbaker TJ, Clayton MK et al. 2007. Human influence on California fire regimes. Ecol. Appl. 17:51388–402 [Google Scholar]
  61. Tague CL, Band LE. 2004. RHESSys: Regional Hydro-Ecologic Simulation System—an object-oriented approach to spatially distributed modeling of carbon, water, and nutrient cycling. Earth Interact. 8:191–42 [Google Scholar]
  62. Theobald DM. 2005. Landscape patterns of exurban growth in the USA from 1980 to 2020. Ecol. Soc. 10:132 [Google Scholar]
  63. US Department of Agriculture 2013. Summary Report: 2010 National Resources Inventory. Rep., Nat. Res. Conserv. Serv./Cent. Surv. Stat. Methodol., Iowa State Univ.
  64. van der Werf GR, Morton DC, DeFries RS, Olivier JGJ, Kasibhatla PS et al. 2009. CO2 emissions from forest loss. Nat. Geosci. 2:737–38 [Google Scholar]
  65. van Kooten G, Shaikh SL, Suchanek P. 2002. Mitigating climate change by planting trees: the transaction costs trap. Land Econ. 78:4559–72 [Google Scholar]
  66. von Thünen J-H. 1826. The Isolated State Transl. CM Wartenberg, 1966 (From German) [Google Scholar]
  67. Wilcove DS, Rothstein D, Dubow J, Phillips A, Losos E. 2000. Leading threats to biodiversity: what’s imperiling U.S. species?. Precious Heritage: The Status of Biodiversity in the United States Stein BA, Kutner LS, Adams JS. 239–54 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  68. Wu J, Segerson K. 1995. The impact of policies and land characteristics on potential groundwater pollution in Wisconsin. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 77:1033–47 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-resource-100814-125056
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-resource-100814-125056
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error