1932

Abstract

Renewable Portfolio Standards (RPSs) are a key policy measure used by states in the United States to increase their production of renewable electricity. Economic theory shows that RPSs are not first-best policy measures for mitigating greenhouse gas emissions or solving other environmental problems. Nevertheless, they have been politically popular, in part because states hope they will help create new jobs in what the states expect will be a growth industry. Research suggests that RPSs are supported by Democratic legislatures in states with good solar and wind potential, are more likely in states with restructured electricity markets, and are less likely in states heavily dependent on natural gas for electricity generation. Research also suggests that RPSs have been successful at increasing renewable generation capacity, have increased the cost of electricity modestly where they have been implemented, and reduce carbon emissions at a cost roughly consistent with estimates of the social cost of carbon.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-resource-100815-095432
2016-10-05
2024-05-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/resource/8/1/annurev-resource-100815-095432.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-resource-100815-095432&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. AFP (Am. Prosper.) 2014. AFP-Kansas RPS repeal ad: details and sources. AFP Blog Jan. 29. https://americansforprosperity.org/americans-for-prosperity-launches-statewide-tv-radio-to-repeal-rps/
  2. Averch H, Johnson L. 1962. Behavior of the firm under regulatory constraint. Am. Econ. Rev. 52:1052–69 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bushnell J, Holland S, Hughes J, Knittel C. 2014. Strategic policy choice in state-level regulation: the EPA's Clean Power Plan NBER Work. Pap. 21259
  4. Carley S. 2009. State renewable energy electricity policies: an empirical evaluation of effectiveness. Energy Policy 37:3071–81 [Google Scholar]
  5. Carley S. 2011. Decarbonization of the US electricity sector: Are state energy policy portfolios the solution?. Energy Econ. 33:1004–23 [Google Scholar]
  6. Carley S, Miller C. 2012. Regulatory stringency and policy drivers: a reassessment of renewable portfolio standards. Policy Stud. J. 40:730–56 [Google Scholar]
  7. Chandler J. 2009. Trendy solutions: Why do states adopt sustainable energy portfolio standards?. Energy Policy 37:3274–81 [Google Scholar]
  8. Delmas M, Montes-Sancho M. 2011. US state policies for renewable energy: context and effectiveness. Energy Policy 39:2273–88 [Google Scholar]
  9. EPA (US Environ. Prot. Agency) 2015. Carbon pollution emission guidelines for existing stationary sources: electric utility generating units; final rule. Fed. Reg. 80(205), 40 CFR Part 60, Oct. 23. https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2015-10-23/pdf/2015-22842.pdf
  10. Fischer C. 2010. Renewable portfolio standards: When do they lower energy prices?. Energy J. 31:101–19 [Google Scholar]
  11. Fischer C, Newell R. 2008. Environmental and technology policies for climate mitigation. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 55:142–62 [Google Scholar]
  12. Fischlein M, Smith T. 2013. Revisiting renewable portfolio standard effectiveness: policy design and outcome specification matter. Policy Sci. 46:277–310 [Google Scholar]
  13. Fowler L, Breen J. 2013. The impact of political factors on states' adoption of renewable portfolio standards. Electr. J. 26:79–94 [Google Scholar]
  14. Goulder L, Jacobsen M, van Benthem A. 2012. Unintended consequences from nested state and federal regulations: the case of the Pavley greenhouse-gas-per-mile limits. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 63:187–207 [Google Scholar]
  15. Goulder L, Stavins R. 2011. Challenges from state-federal interactions in US climate change policy. Am. Econ. Rev. 101:253–57 [Google Scholar]
  16. Hederman RS. 2015. Opinion: Repeal renewable energy mandates. Cincinnati.com July 8. http://www.cincinnati.com/story/opinion/2015/07/08/opinion-repeal-renewable-energy-mandates/29876271/
  17. Holland S, Hughes J, Knittel C. 2009. Greenhouse gas reductions under low carbon fuel standards?. Am. Econ. J. Econ. Policy 1:106–46 [Google Scholar]
  18. Huang M-Y, Alavalapati J, Carter D, Langholtz M. 2007. Is the choice of renewable portfolio standards random?. Energy Policy 35:5571–75 [Google Scholar]
  19. Huisman R, Stradnic V, Westgaard S. 2013. Renewable energy and electricity prices: indirect empirical evidence from hydro power IEB Work. Pap. 2013/024, Erasmus Univ. Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Neth.
  20. Jenner S, Chan G, Frankenberger R, Gabel M. 2012. What drives states to support renewable energy?. Energy J. 33:1–12 [Google Scholar]
  21. Johnson E. 2014. The cost of carbon dioxide abatement from state renewable portfolio standards. Resour. Energy Econ. 36:332–50 [Google Scholar]
  22. Johnson J, Novacheck J. 2015a. Emissions reductions from expanding state-level renewable portfolio standards. Environ. Sci. Technol. 49:5318–25 [Google Scholar]
  23. Johnson J, Novacheck J. 2015b. Environmental benefits of renewable portfolio standards in an age of coal plant retirements. Electr. J. 28:59–68 [Google Scholar]
  24. Johnson J, Novacheck J. 2015c. Expanding the renewable portfolio standard for Michigan: a study Rep., Univ. Mich. Energy Inst., Ann Arbor, MI
  25. Kydes A. 2007. Impacts of a renewable portfolio generation standard on US energy markets. Energy Policy 35:2809–14 [Google Scholar]
  26. Lamontagne L. 2013. Essays in energy economics: an inquiry into renewable portfolio standards PhD Thesis, Clemson Univ., Clemson, SC
  27. Lyon T. 2015. Front groups play a growing and dangerous role in energy policy. USAEE Dialogue 23:3 US Assoc. Energy Econ., Cleveland, OH. http://dialogue.usaee.org/index.php/front-groups-play-a-growing-and-dangerous-role-in-energy-policy [Google Scholar]
  28. Lyon T, Yin H. 2010. Why do states adopt renewable portfolio standards? An empirical investigation. Energy J. 31:133–57 [Google Scholar]
  29. Matisoff D, Edwards J. 2014. Kindred spirits or intergovernmental competition? The innovation and diffusion of energy policies in the American states (1990–2008). Environ. Polit. 23:795–817 [Google Scholar]
  30. Menanteau P, Finon D, Lamy ML. 2003. Prices versus quantities: choosing policies for promoting the development of renewable energy. Energy Policy 31:799–812 [Google Scholar]
  31. Michaels R. 2007. Intermittent currents: the failure of renewable electricity requirements Work. Pap., Dep. Econ., Calif. State Univ., Fullerton, CA. http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1026318
  32. Moore MR, Lewis GM, Cepela D. 2010. Markets for renewable energy and pollution emissions: environmental claims, emission-reduction accounting, and product decoupling. Energy Policy 38:5956–66 [Google Scholar]
  33. Nishio K, Asano H. 2006. Supply amount and marginal price of renewable electricity under the renewables portfolio standard in Japan. Energy Policy 34:2373–87 [Google Scholar]
  34. Ohler A, Radusewicz K. 2010. Indirect impacts in Illinois from a Renewable Portfolio Standard. Electr. J. 23:65–74 [Google Scholar]
  35. Palmer K, Burtraw D. 2005. Cost-effectiveness of renewable electricity policies. Energy Econ. 27:873–94 [Google Scholar]
  36. Prasad M, Munch S. 2012. State-level renewable electricity policies and reductions in carbon emissions. Energy Policy 45:237–42 [Google Scholar]
  37. Rabe B. 2004. Statehouse and Greenhouse: The Emerging Politics of American Climate Change Policy Washington, DC:Brookings Inst.
  38. Sadasivam N. 2015. In W. Va., new G.O.P. majority defangs renewable energy law that never had a bite. Inside Climate News Feb. 5. http://insideclimatenews.org/news/20150205/wva-new-gop-majority-defangs-renewable-energy-law-never-had-bite
  39. Schmalensee R. 2012. Evaluating policies to increase electricity generation from renewable energy. Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy 6:45–64 [Google Scholar]
  40. Shrimali G, Kniefel J. 2011. Are government policies effective in promoting deployment of renewable electricity resources?. Energy Policy 39:4726–41 [Google Scholar]
  41. Simmons R, Yonk R, Brough T, Sim K, Fishbeck J. 2015. Renewable Portfolio Standards: Michigan Rep., Inst. Polit. Econ., Utah State Univ., Logan, UT
  42. Sterner T. 2003. Policy Instruments for Environmental and Natural Resource Management Washington, DC: RFF Press
  43. Stokes L. 2013. The politics of renewable energy policies: the case of feed-in tariffs in Ontario, Canada. Energy Policy 56:490–500 [Google Scholar]
  44. Tra C. 2015. Have Renewable Portfolio Standards raised electricity rates? Evidence from U.S. electric utilities. Contemp. Econ. Policy 34:184–89 [Google Scholar]
  45. Vachon S, Menz F. 2006. The role of social, political, and economic interests in promoting state green energy policies. Environ. Sci. Policy 9:652–62 [Google Scholar]
  46. Weitzman M. 1974. Prices versus quantities. Rev. Econ. Stud. 41:477–91 [Google Scholar]
  47. Yi H, Feiock R. 2012. Policy tool interactions and the adoption of state renewable portfolio standards. Rev. Policy Res. 29:193–206 [Google Scholar]
  48. Yin H, Powers N. 2010. Do state Renewable Portfolio Standards promote in-state renewable generation?. Energy Policy 38:1140–49 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-resource-100815-095432
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-resource-100815-095432
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error