1932

Abstract

A circular economy (CE) would reduce both extraction and disposal by encouraging green design and circular business models, as well as repair, reuse, remanufacturing, and recycling. The CE started among architects and engineers, with little interest among economists. This article introduces CE concepts to economists, introduces key insights about the CE from other disciplines, and describes how economists can use these insights for a more complete economic analysis of policies that can better improve human welfare. An economic model of CE behavior can benefit from understanding the environmental gains from green designs based on engineering,transaction-cost savings from information based on blockchain technology, life cycle assessments based on industrial ecology, and behavioral science concepts of cultural barriers and social decision making that affect how producers and consumers respond to incentives. With various disciplines brought to bear on the subject, the combined analysis can exceed the sum of its parts.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-resource-101321-053659
2022-10-05
2024-04-22
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/resource/14/1/annurev-resource-101321-053659.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-resource-101321-053659&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Abbott JK, Sumaila UR. 2019. Reducing marine plastic pollution: policy insights from economics. Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy 13:327–36
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Akinade O, Oyedele L, Oyedele A, Davila Delgado JM, Bilal M et al. 2020. Design for deconstruction using a circular economy approach: barriers and strategies for improvement. Prod. Plan. Control 31:10829–40
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Alfredsson E, Bengtsson M, Brown HS, Isenhour C, Lorek S et al. 2018. Why achieving the Paris Agreement requires reduced overall consumption and production. Sustain. Sci. Pract. Policy 14:11–5
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Ali O, Ally M, Clutterbuck, Dwivedi Y. 2020. The state of play of blockchain technology in the financial services sector: a systematic literature review. Int. J. Inf. Manag. 54:102199
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Andreoni V. 2017. Energy metabolism of 28 world countries: a multi-scale integrated analysis. Ecol. Econ. 142:56–69
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Appelgren S, Bohlin A. 2015. Growing in motion: the circulation of used things on second-hand markets. Cult. Unbound 7:1143–68
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Architecture 2030 2020. Actions for zero carbon buildings: embodied carbon Santa Fe, NM: Architecture 2030. https://architecture2030.org/embodied-carbon-actions/
  8. Ayres RU. 1989. Industrial metabolism. Technology and Environment J Ausubel, H Sladovich 23–49 Washington, DC: Natl. Acad. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Bahers JB, Tanguy A, Pincetl S. 2020. Metabolic relationships between cities and hinterland: a political-industrial ecology of energy metabolism of Saint-Nazaire metropolitan and port area (France). Ecol. Econ. 167:106447
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Bassi AM, Tan Z, Mbi A. 2012. Estimating the impact of investing in a resource efficient, resilient global energy-intensive manufacturing industry. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 79:169–84
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Bauwens T, Hekkert M, Kirchherr J. 2020. Circular futures: What will they look like?. Ecol. Econ. 175:106703
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Benoit-Norris C, Cavan DA, Norris G. 2012. Identifying social impacts in product supply chains: overview and application of the social hotspot database. Sustainability 4:91946–65
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Bento AM. 2013. Equity impacts of environmental policy. Annu. Rev. Resour. Econ. 5:181–96
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Bocken NMP, de Pauw I, Bakker C, van der Grinten B. 2016. Product design and business model strategies for a circular economy. J. Ind. Prod. Eng. 33:5308–20
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Bouman M, Heijungs R, Van Der Voet E, Van Den Bergh JCJM, Huppes G 2000. Material flows and economic models: an analytical comparison of SFA, LCA and partial equilibrium models. Ecol. Econ. 32:2195–216
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Bourguignon D. 2016. Circular economy package: four legislative proposals on waste Brief, Eur. Parliam. Res. Serv. Strasbourg, Fr: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/EPRS/EPRS-Briefing-573936-Circular-economy-package-FINAL.pdf
  17. Boyd J, Banzhaf S. 2007. What are ecosystem services? The need for standardized environmental accounting units. Ecol. Econ. 63:2–3616–26
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Bradley K, Persson O. 2022. Community repair in the circular economy – fixing more than stuff. Local Environ https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2022.2041580
    [Crossref]
  19. Bruel A, Kronenberg J, Troussier N, Guillaume B 2019. Linking industrial ecology and ecological economics: a theoretical and empirical foundation for the circular economy. J. Ind. Ecol. 23:112–21
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Bustamante ML, Hubler B, Gaustad G, Babbitt CW. 2016. Life cycle assessment of jointly produced solar energy materials: challenges and best practices. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 156:11–26
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Camacho-Otero J, Boks C, Pettersen IN. 2018. Consumption in the circular economy: a literature review. Sustainability 10:82758
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Carney Almroth B, Eggert H. 2019. Marine plastic pollution: sources, impacts, and policy issues. Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy 13:2317–26
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Chertow MR. 2000. Industrial symbiosis: literature and taxonomy. Annu. Rev. Energy Environ. 25:313–37
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Chidepatil A, Bindra P, Kulkarni D, Qazi M, Kshirsagar M, Sankaran K. 2020. From trash to cash: How blockchain and multi-sensor-driven artificial intelligence can transform circular economy of plastic waste?. Adm. Sci. 10:223
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Chohan UW. 2021. Non-fungible tokens: blockchains, scarcity, and value Crit. Blockchain Res. Initiat. Work. Pap http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3822743
    [Crossref]
  26. Crocker R, Saint C, Chen G, Tong Y, eds. 2018. Unmaking Waste in Production and Consumption: Towards The Circular Economy Bingley, UK: Emerald Publ.
  27. Cruz Rios F, Grau D, Bilec M 2021. Barriers and enablers to circular building design in the US: an empirical study. J. Constr. Eng. Manag. 147:1004021117
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Dias SM. 2016. Waste pickers and cities. Environ. Urban. 28:2375–90
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Domingo NG, Balasubramanian S, Thakrar SK, Clark MA, Adams PJ et al. 2021. Air quality-related health damages of food. PNAS 118:20e2013637118
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Dufourmont J, Brown EG. 2020. Jobs & skills in the circular economy: state of play and future pathways Rep. Circle Economy Amsterdam: https://www.circle-economy.com/resources/jobs-skills-in-the-circular-economy-state-of-play-and-future-pathways
  31. Edwards S, Kelleher M, Valiante U, Love G, Grushack S. 2020. Successful plastic packaging management programs and innovations Rep. Eunomia Res. Consult. Inc. New York: https://www.ezview.wa.gov/Portals/_1962/Documents/PlasticsPackaging/Successful%20Plastic%20Packaging%20Management%20Programs%20and%20Innovations%20Report_Executive%20Summary_05182020.pdf
  32. Ellen MacArthur Foundation, World Economic Forum, and McKinsey & Company 2014. Towards the Circular Economy: Accelerating the Scale-Up Across Global Supply Chains Geneva: World Econ. Forum https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_ENV_TowardsCircularEconomy_Report_2014.pdf
  33. Ezeah C, Fazakerley JA, Roberts CL. 2013. Emerging trends in informal sector recycling in developing and transition countries. Waste Manag 33:112509–19
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Fenichel EP, Abbott JK. 2014. Natural capital: from metaphor to measurement. J. Assoc. Environ. Resour. Econ. 1:1/21–27
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Fenichel EP, Abbott JK, Bayham J, Boone W, Haacker EMK, Pfeiffer L. 2016. Measuring the value of groundwater and other forms of natural capital. PNAS 113:92382–87
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Fischer-Kowalski M, Krausmann F, Giljum S, Lutter S, Mayer A et al. 2011. Methodology and indicators of economy-wide material flow accounting: state of the art and reliability across sources. J. Ind. Ecol. 15:6855–76
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Fitch-Roy O, Benson D, Monciardini D 2020. Going around in circles? Conceptual recycling, patching and policy layering in the EU circular economy package. Environ. Politics 29:6983–1003
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Flachenecker F, Kornejew M. 2019. The causal impact of material productivity on microeconomic competitiveness and environmental performance in the European Union. Environ. Econ. Policy Stud. 21:81–122
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Forlin V, Scholz E-M. 2020. Strategic take-back programs when consumers have heterogeneous environmental preferences. Resour. Energy Econ. 60:101150
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Frosch RA, Gallopoulos NE. 1989. Strategies for manufacturing. Sci. Am. 261:3144–52
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Fudenberg D, Tirole J. 1998. Upgrades, tradeins, and buybacks. RAND J. Econ. 29:2235–58
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Fullerton D. 2011. Six distributional effects of environmental policy. Risk Anal 31:6923–29
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Fullerton D, He S. 2020. Second-best optimal green design in the circular economy Work. Pap. Univ. Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
  44. Fullerton D, He S. 2021. Do market failures create a ‘durability gap’ in the circular economy? NBER Work. Pap. 29073
  45. Fullerton D, Kinnaman TC. 1995. Garbage, recycling, and illicit burning or dumping. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 29:178–91
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Fullerton D, Wu W. 1998. Policies for green design. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 36:2131–48
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Garrido-Prada P, Lenihan H, Doran J, Rammer C, Perez-Alaniz M. 2021. Driving the circular economy through public environmental and energy R&D: evidence from SMEs in the European Union. Ecol. Econ. 182:106884
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Geissdoerfer M, Pieroni MPP, Pigosso DCA, Soufani K. 2020. Circular business models: a review. J. Clean. Prod. 277:123741
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Geissdoerfer M, Savaget P, Bocken NMP, Hultink EJ. 2017. The circular economy—a new sustainability paradigm?. J. Clean. Prod. 143:757–68
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Geng Y, Sarkis J, Ulgiati S, Zhang P. 2013. Measuring China's circular economy. Science 339:1526–27
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Geyer R, Jambeck JR, Law KL. 2017. Production, use, and fate of all plastics ever made. Sci. Adv. 3:7e1700782
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Geyer R, Kuczenski B, Zink T, Henderson A. 2016. Common misconceptions about recycling. J. Ind. Ecol. 20:1010–17
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Ghisellini P, Cialani C, Ulgiati S. 2016. A review on circular economy: the expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems. J. Clean. Prod. 114:11–32
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Gov. France 2018. Roadmap for the circular economy: 50 measures for a 100% circular economy Rep. Gov. France, Paris https://www.ecologie.gouv.fr/sites/default/files/FREC%20anglais.pdf
  55. Gov. Neth 2016. From a linear to a circular economy Cent. Plan. Bur., Gov. Neth. The Hague: https://www.government.nl/topics/circular-economy/from-a-linear-to-a-circular-economy
  56. Graedel TE. 1996. On the concept of industrial ecology. Annu. Rev. Energy Environ. 21:69–98
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Graedel TE. 2019. Material flow analysis from origin to evolution. Environ. Sci. Technol. 53:2112188–96
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Gregson N, Crang M, Fuller S, Holmes H. 2015. Interrogating the circular economy: the moral economy of resource recovery in the EU. Econ. Soc. 44:2218–43
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Grover R, Emmitt S, Copping A 2019. Sustainable development and architectural practice: framing strategic approaches in the United Kingdom. Sustain. Dev. 27:3377–87
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Gutberlet J, Carenzo S, Kain J-H, de Azevedo AMM. 2017. Waste picker organizations and their contribution to the circular economy: two case studies from a Global South perspective. Resources 6:452
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Haas W, Krausmann F, Wiedenhofer D, Heinz M. 2015. How circular is the global economy? An assessment of material flows, waste production, and recycling in the European Union and the world in 2005. J. Ind. Ecol. 19:5765–77
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Hao H, Liu Z, Zhao F, Geng Y, Sarkis J. 2017. Material flow analysis of lithium in China. Resour. Policy 51:100–6
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Hart J, Adams K, Giesekam J, Tingley DD, Pomponi F. 2019. Barriers and drivers in a circular economy: the case of the built environment. Procedia CIRP 80:619–24
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Haupt M, Zschokke M. 2017. How can LCA support the circular economy?—63rd discussion forum on life cycle assessment, Zurich, Switzerland, November 30, 2016. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 22:5832–37
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Hawkins T, Hendrickson C, Higgins C, Matthews HS, Suh S. 2007. A mixed-unit input-output model for environmental life-cycle assessment and material flow analysis. Environ. Sci. Technol. 41:31024–31
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Hendrickson C, Horvath A, Joshi S, Lave L. 1998. Economic input-output models for environmental life-cycle assessment. Environ. Sci. Technol. 32:184A–91A
    [Google Scholar]
  67. Hicks AL, Theis TL, Zellner ML. 2015. Emergent effects of residential lighting choices: prospects for energy savings. J. Ind. Ecol. 19:2285–95
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Hobson K. 2020.. ‘ Small stories of closing loops’: social circularity and the everyday circular economy. Clim. Change 163:199–116
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Hofmann E, Strewe UM, Bosia N. 2018. Discussion—How does the full potential of blockchain technology in supply chain finance look like?. Supply Chain Finance and Blockchain Technology: The Case of Reverse Securitisation77–87 Berlin: Springer
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Holland SP, Mansur ET, Muller NZ, Yates AJ. 2016. Are there environmental benefits from driving electric vehicles? The importance of local factors. Am. Econ. Rev. 106:123700–29
    [Google Scholar]
  71. Humbert S, Rossi V, Margni M, Jolliet O, Loerincik Y. 2009. Life cycle assessment of two baby food packaging alternatives: glass jars versus plastic pots. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 14:295–106
    [Google Scholar]
  72. Isenhour C. 2010. On conflicted Swedish consumers, the effort to stop shopping and neoliberal environmental governance. J. Consum. Behav. 9:6454–69
    [Google Scholar]
  73. Isenhour C. 2016. Unearthing human progress? Ecomodernism and contrasting definitions of technological progress in the Anthropocene. Econ. Anthropol. 3:2315–28
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Kanters J. 2020. Circular building design: an analysis of barriers and drivers for a circular building sector. Buildings 10:477
    [Google Scholar]
  75. Katz D. 2019. Plastic Bank: launching Social Plastic® revolution. Field Actions Sci. Rep.Special Issue 1996–99
    [Google Scholar]
  76. Kaza S, Yao LC, Bhada-Tata P, Van Woerden F. 2018. What a Waste 2.0: A Global Snapshot of Solid Waste Management to 2050 Washington, DC: World Bank
  77. Khanna M, Zilberman D. 1997. Incentives, precision technology and environmental protection. Ecol. Econ. 23:25–43
    [Google Scholar]
  78. Kirchherr J, Piscicelli L, Bour R, Kostense-Smit E, Muller J et al. 2018. Barriers to the circular economy: evidence from the European Union (EU). Ecol. Econ. 150:264–72
    [Google Scholar]
  79. Kissling R, Coughlan D, Fitzpatrick C, Boeni H, Luepschen C et al. 2013. Success factors and barriers in re-use of electrical and electronic equipment. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 80:121–31
    [Google Scholar]
  80. Klug L. 2019. 10 Arrested in multi-state recycling fraud schemes. CalRecycle Nov. 6. https://www.calrecycle.ca.gov/newsroom/2019/11nov/19
    [Google Scholar]
  81. Knussen C, Yule F 2008.. “ I'm not in the habit of recycling”: the role of habitual behavior in the disposal of household waste. Environ. Behav. 40:5683–702
    [Google Scholar]
  82. Korhonen J, Honkasalo A, Seppälä J. 2018. Circular economy: the concept and its limitations. Ecol. Econ. 143:37–46
    [Google Scholar]
  83. Kouhizadeh M, Sarkis J. 2018. Blockchain practices, potentials, and perspectives in greening supply chains. Sustainability 10:103652
    [Google Scholar]
  84. Kozminska U. 2019. Circular design: reused materials and the future reuse of building elements in architecture. Process, challenges and case studies. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 225:012033
    [Google Scholar]
  85. Krausmann F, Schandl H, Eisenmenger N, Giljum S, Jackson T. 2017. Material flow accounting: measuring global material use for sustainable development. Annu. Rev. Energy Environ. 42:647–75
    [Google Scholar]
  86. Lacovidou E, Purnell P. 2016. Mining the physical infrastructure: opportunities, barriers and interventions in promoting structural components reuse. Sci. Total Environ. 557–558 791–807
    [Google Scholar]
  87. Laubinger F, Lanzi E, Chateau J. 2020. Labour market consequences of a transition to a circular economy: a review paper. Int. Rev. Environ. Resour. Econ. 14:4381–416
    [Google Scholar]
  88. Laville S. 2018. UK plastics recycling industry under investigation for fraud and corruption. Guardian Oct. 19. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2018/oct/18/uk-recycling-industry-under-investigation-for-and-corruption
    [Google Scholar]
  89. Lee E, Theis T. 2021. Blockchain-enabled plastic recycling, cost saving opportunities Work. Pap. Univ. Illinois Chicago:
  90. Leiding B, Norta A. 2017. Mapping requirements specifications into a formalized blockchain-enabled authentication protocol for secured personal identity assurance Paper presented at the International Conference on Future Data and Security Engineering Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam: Nov. 29–Dec. 1
  91. Leslie HA, Leonards PEG, Brandsma SH, de Boer J, Jonkers N. 2016. Propelling plastics into the circular economy—weeding out the toxics first. Environ. Int. 94:230–34
    [Google Scholar]
  92. Lipper L, Thornton P, Campbell BM, Baedeker T, Braimoh A et al. 2014. Climate-smart agriculture for food security. Nat. Clim. Change 4:1068–72
    [Google Scholar]
  93. Liu X, Wang Z, Jin C, Li F, Li G 2019. A blockchain-based medical data sharing and protection scheme. IEEE Access 7:118943–53
    [Google Scholar]
  94. Manderson EJ, Considine TJ. 2018. An economic perspective on industrial ecology. Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy 12:2304–23
    [Google Scholar]
  95. Mandras G, Conte A. 2020. Mapping global value chains. Quantitative Methods for Place-Based Innovation Policy: Measuring the Growth Potential of Regions R Capello, A Kleibrink, M Matusiak 78–108 Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publ.
    [Google Scholar]
  96. Markarian J. 2021. Lifecycles without end. Plast. Eng. 77:326–31
    [Google Scholar]
  97. Martín Gómez AM, Aguayo González F, Marcos Bárcena M. 2018. Smart eco-industrial parks: a circular economy implementation based on industrial metabolism. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 135:58–69
    [Google Scholar]
  98. Marvuglia A, Benetto E, Rege S, Jury C. 2013. Modelling approaches for consequential life-cycle assessment (C-LCA) of bioenergy: critical review and proposed framework for biogas production. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 25:768–81
    [Google Scholar]
  99. Mathai MV, Isenhour C, Stevis D, Vergragt P, Bengtsson M et al. 2021. The political economy of (un)sustainable production and consumption: a multidisciplinary synthesis for research and action. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 167:105265
    [Google Scholar]
  100. Mathews JA, Tan H. 2011. Progress toward a circular economy in China: the drivers (and inhibitors) of eco-industrial initiative. J. Ind. Ecol. 15:3435–57
    [Google Scholar]
  101. Matthews HS, Hendrickson CT, Matthews DH. 2018. Life Cycle Assessment: Quantitative Approaches for Decisions that Matter Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon Univ. Press
  102. McAloone TC, Pigosso DCA. 2018. Ecodesign implementation and LCA. Life Cycle Assess. Theory Pract545–76
    [Google Scholar]
  103. McKinsey & Co 2017. Mapping the benefits of a circular economy. McKinsey Q. 2017:212–17
    [Google Scholar]
  104. Milios L. 2018. Advancing to a circular economy: three essential ingredients for a comprehensive policy mix. Sustain. Sci. 13:3861–78
    [Google Scholar]
  105. Milios L, Holm Christensen L, McKinnon D, Christensen C, Rasch MK, Hallstrøm Eriksen M. 2018. Plastic recycling in the Nordics: a value chain market analysis. Waste Manag 76:180–89
    [Google Scholar]
  106. Millar K. 2015. Reclaiming the Discarded: Life and Labor on Rio's Garbage Dump Durham, NC: Duke Univ. Press
  107. Millette S, Williams E, Hull CE 2019. Materials flow analysis in support of circular economy development: plastics in Trinidad and Tobago. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 150:104436
    [Google Scholar]
  108. Minx JC, Wiedmann T, Wood R, Peters GP, Lenzen M et al. 2010. Input-output analysis and carbon footprinting: an overview of applications. Econ. Syst. Res. 21:3187–216
    [Google Scholar]
  109. Muller NZ, Mendelsohn R, Nordhaus W. 2011. Environmental accounting for pollution in the United States economy. Am. Econ. Rev. 101:51649–75
    [Google Scholar]
  110. Müller R, Schönbauer SM. 2020. Zero waste—zero justice?. Engag. Sci. Technol. Soc. 6:416–20
    [Google Scholar]
  111. Muranko Z, Andrews D, Chaer I, Newton EJ. 2019. Circular economy and behaviour change: using persuasive communication to encourage pro-circular behaviours towards the purchase of remanufactured refrigeration equipment. J. Clean. Prod. 222:499–510
    [Google Scholar]
  112. Murray A, Skene K, Haynes K. 2017. The circular economy: an interdisciplinary exploration of the concept and application in a global context. J. Bus. Ethics 140:3369–80
    [Google Scholar]
  113. Norris GA. 2001. Integrating economic analysis into LCA. Environ. Qual. Manag. 10:359–64
    [Google Scholar]
  114. Novo O. 2018. Blockchain meets IoT: an architecture for scalable access management in IoT. IEEE Internet Things J 5:21184–95
    [Google Scholar]
  115. OECD (Organ. Econ. Co-op. Dev.) 2019. Circular business models. Business Models for the Circular Economy: Opportunities and Challenges for Policy23–40 Paris: OECD Publ.
    [Google Scholar]
  116. Palmer K, Walls M. 1997. Optimal policies for solid waste disposal taxes, subsidies, and standards. J. Public Econ. 65:2193–205
    [Google Scholar]
  117. Parajuly K, Fitzpatrick C, Muldoon O, Kuehr R. 2020. Behavioral change for the circular economy: a review with focus on electronic waste management in the EU. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 10:6100035
    [Google Scholar]
  118. Peattie K. 2010. Green consumption: behavior and norms. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 35:195–228
    [Google Scholar]
  119. Pellow DN. 1998. Bodies on the line: environmental inequalities: hazardous work in the U.S. recycling industry. Race Gender Class 6:1124–51
    [Google Scholar]
  120. Pizzol M, Weidema B, Brandão M, Osset P. 2015. Monetary valuation in life cycle assessment: a review. J. Clean. Prod. 86:170–79
    [Google Scholar]
  121. Queiroz MM, Telles R, Bonilla SH. 2019. Blockchain and supply chain management integration: a systematic review of the literature. Supply Chain Manag. 25:2241–54
    [Google Scholar]
  122. Rajagopal D, Hochman G, Zilberman D. 2011. Indirect fuel use change (IFUC) and the lifecycle environmental impact of biofuel policies. Energy Policy 39:1228–33
    [Google Scholar]
  123. Rajagopal D, Plevin R, Hochman G, Zilberman D. 2015. Multi-objective regulations on transportation fuels: comparing renewable fuel mandates and emission standards. Energy Econ. 49:359–69
    [Google Scholar]
  124. Rajagopal D, Vanderghem C, MacLean HL. 2017. Life cycle assessment for economists. Annu. Rev. Resour. Econ. 9:361–81
    [Google Scholar]
  125. Rakhshan K, Morel J-C, Alaka H, Charef R. 2020. Components reuse in the building sector - a systematic review. Waste Manag. Res. 38:347–70
    [Google Scholar]
  126. Reh L. 2013. Process engineering in circular economy. Particuology 11:2119–33
    [Google Scholar]
  127. Richa K, Babbitt CW, Gaustad G, Wang X. 2014. A future perspective on lithium-ion battery waste flows from electric vehicles. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 83:63–76
    [Google Scholar]
  128. Rizos V, Behrens A, Gaast WV, Hofman E, Ioannou A et al. 2016. Implementation of circular economy business models by small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs): barriers and enablers. Sustainability 8:111212
    [Google Scholar]
  129. Roberts BH. 2014. Industrial ecology. Australian Environmental Planning: Challenges and Future Prospects J Byrne, N Sipe, J Dodson 158–68 London: Routledge
    [Google Scholar]
  130. Roeck D, Sternberg H, Hofmann E. 2020. Distributed ledger technology in supply chains: a transaction cost perspective. Int. J. Prod. Res. 58:72124–41
    [Google Scholar]
  131. Ryen EG, Babbitt CW, Tyler AC, Babbitt GA. 2014. Community ecology perspectives on the structural and functional evolution of consumer electronics. J. Ind. Ecol. 18:5708–21
    [Google Scholar]
  132. Ryen EG, Gaustad G, Babbitt CW, Babbitt G. 2018. Ecological foraging models as inspiration for optimized recycling systems in the circular economy. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 135:48–57
    [Google Scholar]
  133. Santagata R, Zucaro A, Viglia S, Ripa M, Tian X, Ulgiati S. 2020. Assessing the sustainability of urban eco-systems through Emergy-based circular economy indicators. Ecol. Indic. 109:105859
    [Google Scholar]
  134. Savelyev A. 2018. Copyright in the blockchain era: promises and challenges. Comput. Law Secur. Rev. 34:3550–61
    [Google Scholar]
  135. Schlosser R, Chenavaz RY, Dimitrov S. 2021. Circular economy: joint dynamic pricing and recycling investments. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 236:108117
    [Google Scholar]
  136. Schröder P, Dewick P, Kusi-Sarpong S, Hofstetter JS. 2018. Circular economy and power relations in global value chains: tensions and trade-offs for lower income countries. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 136:77–78
    [Google Scholar]
  137. Schröder P, Lemille A, Desmond P. 2020. Making the circular economy work for human development. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 156:104686
    [Google Scholar]
  138. Singh S, Babbitt C, Gaustad G, Eckelman MJ, Gregory J et al. 2021. Thematic exploration of sectoral and cross-cutting challenges to circular economy implementation. Clean Technol. Environ. Policy 3:915–36
    [Google Scholar]
  139. Soron D. 2019. Practice does not make perfect: sustainable consumption, practice theory, and the question of power. Power and Politics in Sustainable Consumption Research and Practice C Isenhour 45–61 London: Routledge
    [Google Scholar]
  140. Stahel WR. 1986. Product life as a variable: the notion of utilization. Sci. Public Policy 13:4185–93
    [Google Scholar]
  141. Stahel WR. 2016. The circular economy. Nature 531:7595435–38
    [Google Scholar]
  142. Temesgen A, Storsletten V, Jakobsen O. 2021. Circular economy—reducing symptoms or radical change?. Philos. Manag. 20:137–56
    [Google Scholar]
  143. Thompson RC, Moore CJ, vom Saal FS, Swan SH. 2009. Plastics, the environment and human health: current consensus and future trends. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 364:15262153–66
    [Google Scholar]
  144. UNIDO (United Nations Ind. Dev. Organ.) 2019. Addressing the challenge of marine plastic litter using circular economy methods: relevant considerations Work. Pap. UNIDO Vienna: https://www.unido.org/sites/default/files/files/2019-06/UNIDO_Addressing_the_challenge_of_Marine_Plastic_Litter_Using_Circular_Economy.pdf
  145. US EPA (US Environ. Prot. Agency) 2018. Advancing sustainable materials management: 2015 fact sheet Fact Sheet, US Environ. Prot. Agency Washington, DC: https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2018-07/documents/2015_smm_msw_factsheet_07242018_fnl_508_002.pdf
  146. Valero A, Valero A. 2020. Thermodynamic rarity and recyclability of raw materials in the energy transition: the need for an in-spiral economy. Entropy 21:9873
    [Google Scholar]
  147. Van Beukering PJH, Bouman MN. 2001. Empirical evidence on recycling and trade of paper and lead in developed and developing countries. World Dev 29:101717–37
    [Google Scholar]
  148. Wagner TP, Toews P, Bouvier R. 2013. Increasing diversion of household hazardous wastes and materials through mandatory retail take-back. J. Environ. Manag. 123:88–97
    [Google Scholar]
  149. Walls M. 2006. Extended producer responsibility and product design: economic theory and selected case studies RFF Discuss. Pap. 06-08 Resour. Fut. Washington, DC: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.901661
    [Crossref]
  150. Walls M, Palmer K. 2001. Upstream pollution, downstream waste disposal, and the design of comprehensive environmental policies. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 41:194–108
    [Google Scholar]
  151. Whalen KA, Milios L, Nussholz J. 2018. Bridging the gap: barriers and potential for scaling reuse practices in the Swedish ICT sector. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 135:123–31
    [Google Scholar]
  152. Wheeler K, Glucksmann M. 2015.. “ It's kind of saving them a job isn't it?” The consumption work of household recycling. Sociol. Rev. 63:3551–69
    [Google Scholar]
  153. Wiedmann TO, Schandl H, Lenzen M, Moran D, Suh S et al. 2015. The material footprint of nations. PNAS 112:206271–76
    [Google Scholar]
  154. Wijkman A, Skånberg K. 2017. The Circular Economy and Benefits for Society: Jobs and Climate Clear Winners in an Economy Based on Renewable Energy and Resource Efficiency Zurich: Club of Rome https://clubofrome.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/The-Circular-Economy-and-Benefits-for-Society.pdf
  155. Yu X, Zhang Y. 2021. An economic mechanism of industrial ecology: theory and evidence. Struct. Change Econ. Dyn. 58:14–22
    [Google Scholar]
  156. Zajko K, Hojnik BB. 2018. Social franchising model as a scaling strategy for ICT reuse: a case study of an international franchise. Sustainability 10:93144
    [Google Scholar]
  157. Zapata Campos MJ, Zapata P, Ordoñez I 2020. Urban commoning practices in the repair movement: frontstaging the backstage. Environ. Plan. A Econ. Space 52:61150–70
    [Google Scholar]
  158. Zhu J, Fan C, Shi H, Shi L. 2019. Efforts for a circular economy in China: a comprehensive review of policies. J. Ind. Ecol. 23:1110–18
    [Google Scholar]
  159. Zink T, Geyer R. 2017. Circular economy rebound. J. Ind. Ecol. 21:3593–602
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-resource-101321-053659
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-resource-101321-053659
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplemental Material

Supplementary Data

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error