1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Resource Economics
  4. Volume 13, 2021
  5. Article

Annual Review of Resource Economics

Volume 13, 2021

Agricultural Trade and Environmental Sustainability

Abstract

Global agriculture consumes substantial resources and produces significant pollution. By shifting its production to new locations, and inducing changes in technology and input use, trade has a substantial impact on environmental sustainability of the world's food systems, but due to suboptimal environmental policy, the exact nature of these impacts is in dispute. We review the literature on agricultural trade and environmental sustainability, highlighting the different approaches taken in ecology versus economics. While useful in identifying environmental costs, much of the ecological literature does not compare these costs to a trade-free counterfactual and can therefore be misleading. Further, by moving production to places with more resources and increasing production efficiency, trade can reduce the environmental impact of food production. On the other hand, trade can also limit the effectiveness of domestic environmental policy because production can be shifted to countries with less stringent regulations. However, recently, consumers are leveraging trade policy to induce exporters to improve environmental sustainability. While such policies are gaining traction in wealthy countries, evidence suggests that such measures will not reach their potential without buy-in from decision makers in the countries where the environmental damages are occurring.

Keyword(s): agricultural trade, environmental policy, externalities, JEL Q17, JEL Q50, pollution, sustainability
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-resource-101420-090453
2021-10-05
2024-05-08
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/resource/13/1/annurev-resource-101420-090453.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-resource-101420-090453&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Abate TG, Nielsen R, Tveterås R. 2016. Stringency of environmental regulation and aquaculture growth: a cross-country analysis. Aquac. Econ. Manag. 20:2201–21
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Allan JA. 1996. Water use and development in arid regions: environment, economic development and water resource politics and policy. Rev. Eur. Community Int. Environ. Law 5:2107–15
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Al-Riffai P, Dimaranan B, Laborde D. 2010. Global trade and environmental impact study of the EU biofuels mandate Final Draft Rep., Int. Food Policy Res. Inst. Washington, DC: http://environmentportal.in/files/biofuelsreportec.pdf
  4. Angelsen A, Kaimowitz D 2001. When does technological change in agriculture promote deforestation. Tradeoffs or Synergies? Agricultural Intensification, Economic Development and the Environment DR Lee, CB Barrett 89–114 Wallingford, UK: CABI Publ https://www.cifor.org/knowledge/publication/750/
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Avetisyan M, Golub A, Hertel T, Rose S, Henderson B 2011. Why a global carbon policy could have a dramatic impact on the pattern of the worldwide livestock production. Appl. Econ. Perspect. Policy 33:4584–605
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Avetisyan M, Hertel T, Sampson G. 2014. Is local food more environmentally friendly? The GHG emissions impacts of consuming imported versus domestically produced food. Environ. Resour. Econ. 58:3415–62
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Babiker MH. 2005. Climate change policy, market structure, and carbon leakage. J. Int. Econ. 65:2421–45
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Baldos ULC, Hertel TW, Moore FC 2019. Understanding the spatial distribution of welfare impacts of global warming on agriculture and its drivers. Am. J. Agric. Econ 101:51455–72
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Barbier EB, Schulz CE. 1997. Wildlife, biodiversity and trade. Environ. Dev. Econ. 2:2145–72
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Barrett CB, Reardon T, Swinnen J, Zilberman D. 2019. Structural transformation and economic development: insights from the agri-food value chain revolution Work. Pap., Dyson Sch. Appl. Econ. Manag., Cornell Univ Ithaca, NY: http://barrett.dyson.cornell.edu/files/papers/BRSZ%2013%20Aug%202019.pdf
  11. Bellora C, Bourgeon JM. 2019. Food trade and biodiversity effects. Int. Econ. Rev. 60:41957–99
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Blomström M, Kokko A. 1999. How foreign investment affects host countries Policy Res. Work. Pap., World Bank New York: https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-1745
    [Crossref]
  13. Böhringer C, Balistreri EJ, Rutherford TF. 2012. The role of border carbon adjustment in unilateral climate policy: overview of an Energy Modeling Forum Study (EMF 29). Energy Econ 34:Suppl. 2S97–110
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Borlaug N. 2007. Feeding a hungry world. Science 318:5849359
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Brander J, Taylor MS. 1997. International trade and open-access renewable resources: the small open economy case. Can. J. Econ. 30:3526–52
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Brink C, Vollebergh HRJ, van der Werf E. 2016. Carbon pricing in the EU: evaluation of different EU ETS reform options. Energy Policy 97:603–17
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Bulte EH, Barbier EB. 2005. Trade and renewable resources in a second best world: an overview. Environ. Resour. Econ. 30:4423–63
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Burney JA, Davis SJ, Lobell DB 2010. Greenhouse gas mitigation by agricultural intensification. PNAS 107:2612052–57
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Busch J, Ferretti-Gallon K. 2017. What drives deforestation and what stops it? A meta-analysis. Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy 11:13–23
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Butcher K, Wick AF, DeSutter T, Chatterjee A, Harmon J. 2016. Soil salinity: a threat to global food security. Agron. J. 108:62189–200
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Candau F, Dienesch E. 2017. Pollution haven and corruption paradise. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 85:171–92
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Carleton TA, Hsiang SM. 2016. Social and economic impacts of climate. Science 353:6304aad9837
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Chapagain AK, Hoekstra AY, Savenije HHG. 2006. Water saving through international trade of agricultural products. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 10:3455–68
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Chaudhary A, Kastner T. 2016. Land use biodiversity impacts embodied in international food trade. Glob. Environ. Change 38:May195–204
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Chichilnisky G. 1994. North-South trade and the global environment. Am. Econ. Rev. 84:4851–74
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Clark P, Martínez L. 2016. Local alternatives to private agricultural certification in Ecuador: Broadening access to ‘new markets’?. J. Rural Stud. 45:June292–302
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Copeland BR, Taylor MS. 2004. Trade, growth, and the environment. J. Econ. Lit. 42:17–71
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Copeland BR, Taylor MS. 2009. Trade, tragedy, and the commons. Am. Econ. Rev. 99:3725–49
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Costinot A, Donaldson D, Smith CB. 2016. Evolving comparative advantage and the impact of climate change in agricultural markets: evidence from 1.7 million fields around the world. J. Political Econ. 124:1205–48
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Crenna E, Sinkko T, Sala S. 2019. Biodiversity impacts due to food consumption in Europe. J. Cleaner Prod. 227:378–91
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Cristea A, Hummels D, Puzzello L, Avetisyan M. 2013. Trade and the greenhouse gas emissions from international freight transport. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 65:1153–73
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Dalin C, Konar M, Hanasaki N, Rinaldo A, Rodriguez-Iturbe I 2012. Evolution of the global virtual water trade network. PNAS 109:165989–94
     [Google Scholar]
  33. De Janvry A, Sadoulet E. 2019. Transforming developing country agriculture: removing adoption constraints and promoting inclusive value chain development Work. Pap. 253, Fond. Études Rech. Dév. Int Paris: https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02287668
  34. De Meza D, Gould JR. 1992. The social efficiency of private decisions to enforce property rights. J. Political Econ. 100:3561–80
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Debaere P. 2014. The global economics of water: Is water a source of comparative advantage?. Am. Econ. J. Appl. Econ. 6:232–48
     [Google Scholar]
  36. DeBoe G. 2020. Economic and environmental sustainability performance of environmental policies in agriculture OECD Food Agric. Fish. Pap. 140, OECD Paris: https://doi.org/10.1787/3d459f91-en
    [Crossref]
  37. Dechezleprêtre A, Sato M. 2017. The impacts of environmental regulations on competitiveness. Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy 11:2183–206
     [Google Scholar]
  38. DeFries RS, Fanzo J, Mondal P, Remans R, Wood SA. 2017. Is voluntary certification of tropical agricultural commodities achieving sustainability goals for small-scale producers? A review of the evidence. Environ. Res. Lett. 12:3033001
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Dingel JI, Meng KC, Hsiang SM. 2019. Spatial correlation, trade, and inequality: evidence from the global climate. NBER Work. Pap. 25447: https://doi.org/10.3386/w25447
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  40. Dyrstad JM, Skonhoft A, Christensen MQ, Ødegaard ET. 2019. Does economic growth eat up environmental improvements? Electricity production and fossil fuel emission in OECD countries 1980–2014. Energy Policy 125:103–9
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Ellerman AD, Marcantonini C, Zaklan A. 2016. The European Union emissions trading system: ten years and counting. Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy 10:189–107
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Elliott J, Foster I, Kortum S, Munson T, Cervantes FP, Weisbach D. 2010. Trade and carbon taxes. Am. Econ. Rev. 100:2465–69
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Eshel G, Shepon A, Makov T, Milo R 2014. Land, irrigation water, greenhouse gas, and reactive nitrogen burdens of meat, eggs, and dairy production in the United States. PNAS 111:3311996–12001
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Farrell AE, Plevin RJ, Turner BT, Jones AD, O'Hare M, Kammen DM 2006. Ethanol can contribute to energy and environmental goals. Science 311:5760506–8
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Fischer C. 2010. Does trade help or hinder the conservation of natural resources?. Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy 4:1103–21
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Fuglie K. 2018. R&D capital, R&D spillovers, and productivity growth in world agriculture. Appl. Econ. Perspect. Policy 40:3421–44
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Fullerton D, Heutel G. 2007. The general equilibrium incidence of environmental taxes. J. Public Econ. 91:3571–91
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Garcia DJ, You F. 2018. Addressing global environmental impacts including land use change in life cycle optimization: studies on biofuels. J. Cleaner Prod. 182:313–30
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Gouel C, Laborde D. 2018. The crucial role of international trade in adaptation to climate change NBER Work. Pap. 25221 https://doi.org/10.3386/w25221
    [Crossref]
  50. Gouel C, Laborde D. 2021. The crucial role of domestic and international market-mediated adaptation to climate change. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 106:102408
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Graham NT, Hejazi MI, Kim SH, Davies EGR, Edmonds JA, Miralles-Wilhelm F. 2020. Future changes in the trading of virtual water. Nat. Commun. 11:13632
     [Google Scholar]
  52. He X, Estes L, Konar M, Tian D, Anghileri D et al. 2019. Integrated approaches to understanding and reducing drought impact on food security across scales. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 40:43–54
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Heisey PW, Fuglie KO. 2018. Agricultural research investment and policy reform in high-income countries Rep. 249, Econ. Res. Serv., US Dep. Agric Washington, DC: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/276235/
  54. Hertel TW, Baldos ULC. 2016. Attaining food and environmental security in an era of globalization. Glob. Environ. Change 41:195–205
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Hertel TW, Baldos ULC, Fuglie KO. 2020. Trade in technology: a potential solution to the food security challenges of the 21st century. Eur. Econ. Rev. 127:103479
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Hertel TW, Golub AA, Jones AD, O'Hare M, Plevin RJ, Kammen DM 2010. Effects of US maize ethanol on global land use and greenhouse gas emissions: estimating market-mediated responses. BioScience 60:3223–31
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Hertel TW, Ramankutty N, Baldos ULC 2014. Global market integration increases likelihood that a future African Green Revolution could increase crop land use and CO2 emissions. PNAS 111:3813799–804
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Hertel TW, West TAP, Börner J, Villoria NB. 2019. A review of global-local-global linkages in economic land-use/cover change models. Environ. Res. Lett. 14:5053003
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Hoekstra AY, Chapagain AK. 2007. Water footprints of nations: water use by people as a function of their consumption pattern. Water Resourc. Manag. 21:135–48
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Jaffe AB, Peterson SR, Portney PR, Stavins RN. 1995. Environmental regulation and the competitiveness of U.S. manufacturing: What does the evidence tell us?. J. Econ. Lit. 33:1132–63
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Janssens C, Havlík P, Krisztin T, Baker J, Frank S et al. 2020. Global hunger and climate change adaptation through international trade. Nat. Clim. Change 10:829–35
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Karp L, Sacheti S, Zhao J. 2001. Common ground between free-traders and environmentalists. Int. Econ. Rev. 42:3617–48
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Koch N, zu Ermgassen EKHJ, Wehkamp J, Oliveira Filho FJB, Schwerhoff G. 2019. Agricultural productivity and forest conservation: evidence from the Brazilian Amazon. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 101:3919–40
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Konar M, Evans TP, Levy M, Scott CA, Troy TJ et al. 2016. Water resources sustainability in a globalizing world: Who uses the water?. Hydrol. Process. 30:183330–36
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Kumar MD, Singh OP. 2005. Virtual water in global food and water policy making: Is there a need for rethinking?. Water Resour. Manag. 19:759–89
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Lambin EF, Thorlakson T. 2018. Sustainability standards: interactions between private actors, civil society, and governments. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resourc. 43:369–93
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Lankoski J, Thiem A. 2020. Linkages between agricultural policies, productivity and environmental sustainability. Ecol. Econ. 178:106809
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Lenzen M, Moran D, Kanemoto K, Foran B, Lobefaro L, Geschke A. 2012. International trade drives biodiversity threats in developing nations. Nature 486:7401109–12
     [Google Scholar]
  69. Levinson A. 2010. Offshoring pollution: Is the United States increasingly importing polluting goods?. Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy 4:163–83
     [Google Scholar]
  70. Levinson A, Taylor MS. 2008. Unmasking the pollution haven effect. Int. Econ. Rev. 49:1223–54
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Lipsey RG, Lancaster K. 1956. The general theory of second best. Rev. Econ. Stud. 24:111–32
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Liu J, Hertel TW, Taheripour F, Zhu T, Ringler C. 2014. International trade buffers the impact of future irrigation shortfalls. Glob. Environ. Change 29:22–31
     [Google Scholar]
  73. Liu J, Hull V, Batistella M, DeFries R, Dietz T et al. 2013. Framing sustainability in a telecoupled world. Ecol. Soc. 18:226
     [Google Scholar]
  74. Lobell DB, Baldos ULC, Hertel TW. 2013. Climate adaptation as mitigation: the case of agricultural investments. Environ. Res. Lett. 8:1015012
     [Google Scholar]
  75. Marston L, Konar M, Cai X, Troy TJ 2015. Virtual groundwater transfers from overexploited aquifers in the United States. PNAS 112:288561–66
     [Google Scholar]
  76. Meemken E-M. 2020. Do smallholder farmers benefit from sustainability standards? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Glob. Food Secur. 26:100373
     [Google Scholar]
  77. Meemken E-M, Qaim M. 2018. Organic agriculture, food security, and the environment. Annu. Rev. Resour. Econ. 10:39–63
     [Google Scholar]
  78. Mekonnen MM, Hoekstra AY. 2010. A global and high-resolution assessment of the green, blue and grey water footprint of wheat. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci. 14:71259–76
     [Google Scholar]
  79. Meyfroidt P, Rudel T, Lambin E 2010. Forest transitions, trade, and the global displacement of land use. PNAS 107:20917–22
     [Google Scholar]
  80. Moore FC, Baldos ULC, Hertel T. 2017. Economic impacts of climate change on agriculture: a comparison of process-based and statistical yield models. Environ. Res. Lett. 12:6065008
     [Google Scholar]
  81. Morris AC. 2018. Making border carbon adjustments work in law and practice Rep., Tax Policy Cent., Brookings Inst Washington, DC: https://www.brookings.edu/research/making-border-carbon-adjustments-work-in-law-and-practice/
  82. Nepstad D, McGrath D, Stickler C, Alencar A, Azevedo A et al. 2014. Slowing Amazon deforestation through public policy and interventions in beef and soy supply chains. Science 344:61881118–23
     [Google Scholar]
  83. Nordin I, Wilhelmsson F, Jansson T, Fellmann T, Barreiro-Hurle J, Himics M. 2019. Impact of border carbon adjustments on agricultural emissions—Can tariffs reduce carbon leakage? Paper presented at the 172nd EAAE Seminar Agricultural Policy for the Environment or Environmental Policy for Agriculture?, May 28–29 Brussels. https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/290209
  84. OECD-FAO (Organ. Econ. Coop. Dev.-Food Agric. Organ.) 2020. OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook 2020–2029 Paris: OECD https://www.oecd.org/publications/oecd-fao-agricultural-outlook-19991142.htm
    [Google Scholar]
  85. Paltsev SV. 2001. The Kyoto Protocol: regional and sectoral contributions to the carbon leakage. Energy J 22:453–80
     [Google Scholar]
  86. Pelikan J, Britz W, Hertel TW. 2015. Green light for green agricultural policies? An analysis at regional and global scales. J. Agric. Econ. 66:11–19
     [Google Scholar]
  87. Polasky S, Costello C, McAusland C. 2004. On trade, land-use, and biodiversity. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 48:2911–25
     [Google Scholar]
  88. Porter ME, van der Linde C. 1995. Toward a new conception of the environment-competitiveness relationship. J. Econ. Perspect. 9:497–118
     [Google Scholar]
  89. Reilly J, Hohmann N. 1993. Climate change and agriculture: the role of international trade. Am. Econ. Rev. 83:2306–12
     [Google Scholar]
  90. Roxburgh T, Ellis K, Johnson JJ, Baldos ULC, Hertel TW, Nootenboom C, Polasky S 2020. Global futures: modelling the global economic impacts of environmental change to support policy-making Tech. Rep., World Wildlife Fund London: https://www.wwf.org.uk/sites/default/files/2020-02/Global_Futures_Technical_Report.pdf
  91. Rudel TK, Schneider L, Uriarte M, Turner BL, DeFries R et al. 2009. Agricultural intensification and changes in cultivated areas, 1970–2005. PNAS 106:4920675–80
     [Google Scholar]
  92. Saggi K. 2002. Trade, foreign direct investment, and international technology transfer: a survey. World Bank Res. Obs. 17:2191–235
     [Google Scholar]
  93. Scanlon BR, Faunt CC, Longuevergne L, Reedy RC, Alley WM et al. 2012. Groundwater depletion and sustainability of irrigation in the US High Plains and Central Valley. PNAS 109:249320–25
     [Google Scholar]
  94. Searchinger T, Heimlich R, Houghton RA, Dong F, Elobeid A et al. 2008. Use of U.S. croplands for biofuels increases greenhouse gases through emissions from land-use change. Science 319:58671238–40
     [Google Scholar]
  95. Shapiro JS. 2020. The environmental bias of trade policy NBER Work: Pap. w26845. https://www.nber.org/papers/w26845
  96. Shapiro JS, Walker R. 2018. Why is pollution from US manufacturing declining? The roles of environmental regulation, productivity, and trade. Am. Econ. Rev. 108:123814–54
     [Google Scholar]
  97. Sim S, Barry M, Clift R, Cowell SJ. 2007. The relative importance of transport in determining an appropriate sustainability strategy for food sourcing a case study of fresh produce supply chains. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 12:422
     [Google Scholar]
  98. Springmann M, Clark M, Mason-D'Croz D, Wiebe K, Bodirsky BL et al. 2018. Options for keeping the food system within environmental limits. Nature 562:7728519–25
     [Google Scholar]
  99. Stevenson JR, Villoria N, Byerlee D, Kelley T, Maredia M 2013. Green revolution research saved an estimated 18 to 27 million hectares from being brought into agricultural production. PNAS 110:218363–68
     [Google Scholar]
  100. Swanson TM. 1994. The economics of extinction revisited and revised: a generalised framework for the analysis of the problems of endangered species and biodiversity losses. Oxf. Econ. Pap. 46:800–821
     [Google Scholar]
  101. Swinnen J, Deconinck K, Vandemoortele T, Vandeplas A. 2015. Quality Standards, Value Chains, and International Development: Economic and Political Theory Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  102. Swinnen JFM ed 2007. Global Supply Chains, Standards and the Poor: How the Globalization of Food Systems and Standards Affects Rural Development and Poverty Oxon, UK: CABI
  103. Taheripour F, Hertel TW, Ramankutty N 2019. Market-mediated responses confound policies to limit deforestation from oil palm expansion in Malaysia and Indonesia. PNAS 116:3819193–99
     [Google Scholar]
  104. Tayleur C, Balmford A, Buchanan GM, Butchart SHM, Ducharme H et al. 2017. Global coverage of agricultural sustainability standards, and their role in conserving biodiversity. Conserv. Lett. 10:5610–18
     [Google Scholar]
  105. Torres SM, Moran EF, Bicudo da Silva RF. 2017. Property rights and the soybean revolution: shaping how China and Brazil are telecoupled. Sustainability 9:6954
     [Google Scholar]
  106. Verma M, Hertel T, Diffenbaugh N. 2014. Market-oriented ethanol and corn-trade policies can reduce climate-induced US corn price volatility. Environ. Res. Lett. 9:6064028
     [Google Scholar]
  107. Villoria NB. 2019. Technology spillovers and land use change: empirical evidence from global agriculture. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 101:3870–93
     [Google Scholar]
  108. Villoria NB, Hertel TW. 2011. Geography matters: international trade patterns and the indirect land use effects of biofuels. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 93:4919–35
     [Google Scholar]
  109. Waldman KB, Kerr JM. 2014. Limitations of certification and supply chain standards for environmental protection in commodity crop production. Annu. Rev. Resour. Econ. 6:429–49
     [Google Scholar]
  110. Walker B, Barrett S, Polasky S, Galaz V, Folke C et al. 2009. Looming global-scale failures and missing institutions. Science 325:59461345–46
     [Google Scholar]
  111. Wichelns D. 2015. Virtual water and water footprints do not provide helpful insight regarding international trade or water scarcity. Ecol. Indic. 52:277–83
     [Google Scholar]
  112. Wiedmann T, Lenzen M. 2018. Environmental and social footprints of international trade. Nat. Geosci. 11:5314–21
     [Google Scholar]
  113. Wine ML, Laronne JB. 2020. In water-limited landscapes, an anthropocene exchange: trading lakes for irrigated agriculture. Earth's Future 8:4e2019EF001274
     [Google Scholar]
  114. Yao G, Hertel TW, Taheripour F. 2018. Economic drivers of telecoupling and terrestrial carbon fluxes in the global soybean complex. Glob. Environ. Change 50:May190–200
     [Google Scholar]
  115. Yu Y, Feng K, Hubacek K. 2013. Tele-connecting local consumption to global land use. Glob. Environ. Change 23:51178–86
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-resource-101420-090453
Loading
Agricultural Trade and Environmental Sustainability
Annual Review of Resource Economics 13, 379 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-resource-101420-090453
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-resource-101420-090453
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-resource-101420-090453
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error