1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Resource Economics
  4. Volume 16, 2024
  5. Article

Annual Review of Resource Economics

Volume 16, 2024

The Economics of Geographical Indications: An Update

Abstract

We discuss the economics of geographical indications (GIs), a form of collective branding of products based on their geographic origin. GIs serve as essential tools in addressing market failures stemming from information asymmetries and supporting the provision of high-quality products in competitive settings. They are increasingly used in wine and food markets. We briefly review the institutional development of GIs, discuss the basic economic theory arguments that rationalize the use of GIs, and characterize their key functions. We then examine the empirical evidence from studies that have probed various features of GIs. We find consensus on the potential for GIs to address a very real market failure and the positive role that policies and supporting institutions can play. We also uncover limitations and unresolved problems. GIs have both efficiency and distributional consequences, their international implications remain controversial, and tensions between tradition and innovation emerge while confronting new challenges such as climate change.

Keyword(s): collective reputation, geographical indications, intellectual property, international trade, JEL F13, JEL L15, JEL L66, JEL Q13, market failures, quality certification
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-resource-101623-092812
2024-10-07
2025-04-27
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/resource/16/1/annurev-resource-101623-092812.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-resource-101623-092812&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Akerlof GA. 1970.. The market for “lemons”: quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. . Q. J. Econ. 84:(3):488–500
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  2. Alfnes F, Rickertsen K. 2003.. European consumers’ willingness to pay for US beef in experimental auction markets. . Am. J. Agric. Econ. 85:(2):396–405
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ali HH, Nauges C. 2007.. The pricing of experience goods: the example of en primeur wine. . Am. J. Agric. Econ. 89:(1):91–103
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  4. Alston JM, Gaeta D. 2021.. Reflections on the political economy of European wine appellations. . Ital. Econ. J. 7:(2):219–58
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  5. Aprile MC, Caputo V, Nayga RM Jr. 2012.. Consumers’ valuation of food quality labels: the case of the European geographic indication and organic farming labels. . Int. J. Consum. Stud. 36:(2):158–65
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  6. Ashenfelter O, Storchmann K. 2010.. Using hedonic models of solar radiation and weather to assess the economic effect of climate change: the case of Mosel Valley vineyards. . Rev. Econ. Stat. 92:(2):333–49
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  7. Ashenfelter O, Storchmann K. 2016.. Climate change and wine: a review of the economic implications. . J. Wine Econ. 11:(1):105–38
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  8. Ay JS. 2021.. The informational content of geographical indications. . Am. J. Agric. Econ. 103:(2):523–42
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bontemps C, Bouamra-Mechemache Z, Simioni M. 2013.. Quality labels and firm survival: some first empirical evidence. . Eur. Rev. Agric. Econ. 40:(3):413–39
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  10. Bouamra-Mechemache Z, Chaaban J. 2010.. Determinants of adoption of protected designation of origin label: evidence from the French brie cheese industry. . J. Agric. Econ. 61:(2):225–39
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  11. Bronnenberg BJ, Dubé JP, Syverson C. 2022.. Marketing investment and intangible brand capital. . J. Econ. Perspect. 36:(3):53–74
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  12. Castriota S, Delmastro M. 2015.. The economics of collective reputation: evidence from the wine industry. . Am. J. Agric. Econ. 97:(2):469–89
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  13. Chambolle C, Giraud-Héraud E. 2005.. Certification of origin as a non-tariff barrier. . Rev. Int. Econ. 13:(3):461–71
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  14. Chandra R, Moschini G. 2022.. Product differentiation and the relative importance of wine attributes: US retail prices. . J. Wine Econ. 17:(3):177–208
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  15. Chandra R, Moschini G, Lade GE. 2023.. Geographical indications and welfare: evidence from the US wine market. CARD Work. Pap. 21-WP 628 , Iowa State Univ., Ames:. https://www.card.iastate.edu/products/publications/synopsis/?p=1340
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Clancy MS, Moschini G. 2013.. Incentives for innovation: patents, prizes, and research contracts. . Appl. Econ. Perspect. Policy 35:(2):206–41
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  17. Clark LF, Kerr WA. 2017.. Climate change and terroir: the challenge of adapting geographical indications. . J. World Intellect. Prop. 20:(3–4):88–102
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  18. Combris P, Lecocq S, Visser M. 1997.. Estimation of a hedonic price equation for Bordeaux wine: Does quality matter?. Econ. J. 107:(441):390–402
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  19. Costanigro M, McCluskey JJ, Goemans C. 2010.. The economics of nested names: name specificity, reputations, and price premia. . Am. J. Agric. Econ. 92:(5):1339–50
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  20. Crescenzi R, De Filippis F, Giua M, Vaquero-Piñeiro C. 2022.. Geographical indications and local development: the strength of territorial embeddedness. . Reg. Stud. 56:(3):381–93
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  21. Curzi D, Huysmans M. 2022.. The impact of protecting EU geographical indications in trade agreements. . Am. J. Agric. Econ. 104:(1):364–84
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  22. Curzi D, Olper A. 2012.. Export behavior of Italian food firms: Does product quality matter?. Food Policy 37:(5):493–503
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  23. Deconinck K, Swinnen J. 2021.. The size of terroir: a theoretical note on economics and politics of geographical indications. . J. Agric. Econ. 72:(1):321–28
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  24. De Filippis F, Giua M, Salvatici L, Vaquero-Piñeiro C. 2022.. The international trade impacts of Geographical Indications: Hype or hope?. Food Policy 112::102371
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  25. Deselnicu OC, Costanigro M, Souza-Monteiro DM, McFadden DT. 2013.. A meta-analysis of geographical indication food valuation studies: What drives the premium for origin-based labels?. J. Agric. Resour. Econ. 204–19
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Dixit AK, Stiglitz JE. 1977.. Monopolistic competition and optimum product diversity. . Am. Econ. Rev. 67:(3):297–308
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Duvaleix S, Emlinger C, Gaigné C, Latouche K. 2021.. Geographical indications and trade: firm-level evidence from the French cheese industry. . Food Policy 102::102118
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  28. Economides NS. 1988.. The economics of trademarks. . Trademark Rep. 78::523−39
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Eur. Comm. 2021.. Study on economic value of EU quality schemes, geographical indications (GIs) and traditional specialities guaranteed (TSGs)—Final Report. Eur. Comm., Dir.-Gen. Agric. Rural Dev., Brussels:. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/a7281794-7ebe-11ea-aea8-01aa75ed71a1/language-en
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Fink C, Maskus K. 2006.. The debate on geographical indications in the WTO. . In Trade, Doha, and Development: A Window into the Issues, ed. R Newfarmer , pp. 201–11. Washington, DC:: World Bank
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Fishman A, Finkelstein I, Simhon A, Yacouel N. 2018.. Collective brands. . Int. J. Ind. Organ. 59::316–39
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  32. Grossman GM, Shapiro C. 1988.. Counterfeit-product trade. . Am. Econ. Rev. 78:(1):59–75
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Haeck C, Meloni G, Swinnen J. 2019.. The value of terroir: a historical analysis of the Bordeaux and Champagne geographical indications. . Appl. Econ. Perspect. 41:(4):598–619
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  34. Henry L. 2022.. Adapting the designated area of geographical indications to climate change. . Am. J. Agric. Econ. 105:(4):1088–1115
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  35. Höhn G, Huysmans M, Crombez C. 2022.. Healthy food traditions? Nutritional quality and food composition of EU geographical indications. Discuss. Pap. 429 , LICOS Cent. Inst. Econ. Perform., Kathol. Univ., Leuven, Belg.:
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Huysmans M, Swinnen J. 2019.. No terroir in the cold? A note on the geography of geographical indications. . J. Agric. Econ. 70:(2):550–59
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  37. Johnson R. 2017.. Geographical indications (GIs) in U.S. food and agricultural trade. CRS Rep. 7-7500 , Congr. Res. Serv., Washington, DC:
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Josling T. 2006.. The war on terroir: geographical indications as a transatlantic trade conflict. . J. Agric. Econ. 57:(3):337–63
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  39. Klein B, Leffler KB. 1981.. The role of market forces in assuring contractual performance. . J. Political Econ. 89:(4):615–41
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  40. Landes WM, Posner RA. 2003.. The Economic Structure of Intellectual Property Law. Cambridge, MA:: Harvard Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Landon S, Smith CE. 1998.. Quality expectations, reputation, and price. . South. Econ. J. 64:(3):628–47
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Langinier C, Babcock BA. 2008.. Agricultural production clubs: viability and welfare implications. . J. Agric. Food Ind. Organ. 6:(1):131
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Lapan H, Moschini G. 2009.. Quality certification standards in competitive markets: when consumers and producers (dis)agree. . Econ. Lett. 104:(3):144–47
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  44. Leland HE. 1979.. Quacks, lemons, and licensing: a theory of minimum quality standards. . J. Political Econ. 87:(6):1328–46
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  45. Lence SH, Marette S, Hayes DJ, Foster W. 2007.. Collective marketing arrangements for geographically differentiated agricultural products: welfare impacts and policy implications. . Am. J. Agric. Econ. 89:(4):947–63
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  46. Leufkens D. 2018.. The problem of heterogeneity between protected geographical indications: a meta-analysis. . Br. Food J. 120:(12):2843–56
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  47. López-Bayón S, González-Díaz M, Solís-Rodríguez V, Fernández-Barcala M. 2018.. Governance decisions in the supply chain and quality performance: the synergistic effect of geographical indications and ownership structure. . Int. J. Prod. Econ. 197::1–12
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  48. Mancini MC, Arfini F, Veneziani M, Thévenod-Mottet E. 2017.. Geographical indications and transatlantic trade negotiations: different US and EU perspectives. . EuroChoices 16:(2):34–40
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  49. Melitz MJ. 2003.. The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity. . Econometrica 71:(6):1695–1725
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  50. Meloni G, Swinnen J. 2013.. The political economy of European wine regulations. . J. Wine Econ. 8:(3):244–84
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  51. Meloni G, Swinnen J. 2018.. Trade and terroir. The political economy of the world's first geographical indications. . Food Policy 81::1–20
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  52. Menapace L, Colson G, Grebitus C, Facendola M. 2011.. Consumers’ preferences for geographical origin labels: evidence from the Canadian olive oil market. . Eur. Rev. Agric. Econ. 38:(2):193–212
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  53. Menapace L, Moschini GC. 2012.. Quality certification by geographical indications, trademarks and firm reputation. . Eur. Rev. Agric. Econ. 39:(4):539–66
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  54. Menapace L, Moschini GC. 2014.. Strength of protection for geographical indications: promotion incentives and welfare effects. . Am. J. Agric. Econ. 96:(4):1030–48
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  55. Ménard C, Valceschini E. 2005.. New institutions for governing the agri-food industry. . Eur. Rev. Agric. Econ. 32:(3):421–40
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  56. Mérel PR. 2009a.. Measuring market power in the French Comté cheese market. . Eur. Rev. Agric. Econ. 36:(1):31–51
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  57. Mérel PR. 2009b.. On the deadweight cost of production requirements for geographically differentiated agricultural products. . Am. J. Agric. Econ. 91:(3):642–55
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  58. Mérel P, Ortiz-Bobea A, Paroissien E. 2021.. How big is the “lemons” problem? Historical evidence from French wines. . Eur. Econ. Rev. 138::103824
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  59. Mérel P, Sexton RJ. 2012.. Will geographical indications supply excessive quality?. Eur. Rev. Agric. Econ. 39:(4):567–87
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  60. Moschini G. 2004.. Intellectual property rights and the World Trade Organization: retrospect and prospects. . In Agricultural Policy Reform and the WTO: Where Are We Heading?, ed. G Anania, M Bohman, C Carter, A McCalla , pp. 474–511. Cheltenham, UK:: Edward Elgar
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Moschini G, Menapace L, Pick D. 2008.. Geographical indications and the competitive provision of quality in agricultural markets. . Am. J. Agric. Econ. 90:(3):794–812
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  62. OECD/EUIPO (Organ. Econ. Co-op. Dev./Eur. Union Intellect. Prop. Off.). 2021.. Global Trade in Fakes: A Worrying Threat. Paris:: OECD. https://www.oecd.org/publications/global-trade-in-fakes-74c81154-en.htm
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Outreville JF, Le Fur E. 2020.. Hedonic price functions and wine price determinants: a review of empirical research. . J. Agric. Food Ind. Organ. 18:(2):20190028
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Rackl J, Menapace L. 2023a.. Coordination in agri-food supply chains: the role of geographical indication certification. Work. Pap. , Tech. Univ. Munich, Munich, Ger.: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4581357
    [Google Scholar]
  65. Rackl J, Menapace L. 2023b.. The economics of geographical indications in international markets. Work. Pap. , Tech. Univ. Munich, Munich, Ger.: https://mediatum.ub.tum.de/doc/1724287/1724287.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Raimondi V, Falco C, Curzi D, Olper A. 2020.. Trade effects of geographical indication policy: the EU case. . J. Agric. Econ. 71:(2):330–56
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  67. Saak AE. 2012.. Collective reputation, social norms, and participation. . Am. J. Agric. Econ. 94:(3):763–85
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  68. Saitone TL, Sexton RJ. 2017.. Agri-food supply chain: evolution and performance with conflicting consumer and societal demands. . Eur. Rev. Agric. Econ. 44:(4):634–57
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  69. Schamel G. 2007.. Auction markets for specialty food products with geographical indications. . Agric. Econ. 37:(2–3):257–64
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  70. Shapiro C. 1983.. Premiums for high quality products as returns to reputations. . Q. J. Econ. 98:(4):659–80
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  71. Slade P, Michler JD, Josephson A. 2019.. Foreign geographical indications, consumer preferences, and the domestic market for cheese. . Appl. Econ. Perspect. 41:(3):370–90
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  72. Spence M. 1976.. Product selection, fixed costs, and monopolistic competition. . Rev. Econ. Stud. 43:(2):217–35
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  73. Stanziani A. 2004.. Wine reputation and quality controls: the origin of the AOCs in 19th century France. . Eur. J. Law Econ. 18::149–67
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  74. Stranieri S, Orsi L, De Noni I, Olper A. 2023.. Geographical indications and innovation: evidence from EU regions. . Food Policy 116::102425
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  75. Teuber R, Herrmann R. 2012.. Towards a differentiated modeling of origin effects in hedonic analysis: an application to auction prices of specialty coffee. . Food Policy 37:(6):732–40
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  76. Tirole J. 1996.. A theory of collective reputations (with applications to the persistence of corruption and to firm quality). . Rev. Econ. Stud. 63:(1):1–22
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  77. Winfree JA, McCluskey JJ. 2005.. Collective reputation and quality. . Am. J. Agric. Econ. 87:(1):206–213
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  78. WIPO (World Intellect. Prop. Organ.). 2021.. Geographical Indications: An Introduction. Geneva:: WIPO. , 2nd ed..
     [Google Scholar]
  79. Yu J, Bouamra-Mechemache Z, Zago A. 2018.. What is in a name? Information, heterogeneity, and quality in a theory of nested names. . Am. J. Agric. Econ. 100:(1):286–310
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  80. Zago A. 2015.. La réputation collective sur les marchés agricoles. . Econ. Rurale 345::29–51
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  81. Zappalaglio A. 2021.. The Transformation of EU Geographical Indications Law: The Present, Past and Future of the Origin Link. Abingdon, UK:: Routledge
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-resource-101623-092812
Loading
  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error