1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Resource Economics
  4. Volume 16, 2024
  5. Article

Annual Review of Resource Economics

Volume 16, 2024

Urban Transport Policies and Net Zero Emissions in the European Union

Abstract

This review discusses the role of road transport policies in achieving the European Union's ambitious zero-emission target for the transportation sector by 2050 and provides an overview of the empirical literature that studies the effectiveness of urban transport policies. The analysis is divided into two parts. First, we study policies that are relevant in the transitional phase from internal combustion engine vehicles to battery electric vehicles (BEVs), then we discuss policies that will remain relevant as we switch entirely to BEVs. In the best-case scenario, the transition can be driven by fuel taxes, but in case fuel taxes are not feasible or acceptable, a combination of penalties for buying polluting vehicles and subsidies for scrappage of such vehicles might be the best compromise. In the long run, road space will be increasingly at a premium, and to ensure its efficient use, increasingly sophisticated road-pricing policies will be needed.

Keyword(s): congestion, electric vehicles, JEL Q53, JEL Q54, JEL R48, JEL R58, local pollution, net zero emissions, urban transport policies
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-resource-101623-101611
2024-10-07
2024-10-14
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/resource/16/1/annurev-resource-101623-101611.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-resource-101623-101611&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Adamou A, Clerides S, Zachariadis T. 2014.. Welfare implications of car feebates: a simulation analysis. . Econ. J. 124::F420–43
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  2. Alberini A, Bareit M. 2019.. The effect of registration taxes on new car sales and emissions: evidence from Switzerland. . Resour. Energy Econ. 56::96–112
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  3. Alberini A, Horvath M. 2021.. All car taxes are not created equal: evidence from Germany. . Energy Econ. 100::105329
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  4. Alberini A, Horvath M, Vance C. 2022.. Drive less, drive better, or both? Behavioral adjustments to fuel price changes in Germany. . Resour. Energy Econ. 68::101292
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  5. Allcott H, Knittel C. 2019.. Are consumers poorly informed about fuel economy? Evidence from two experiments. . Am. Econ. J. Econ. Policy 11:(1):137
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  6. Anderson ST, Sallee JM. 2016.. Designing policies to make cars greener. . Annu. Rev. Resour. Econ. 8::157–80
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  7. Andersson JJ. 2019.. Carbon taxes and CO2 emissions: Sweden as a case study. . Am. Econ. J. Econ. Policy 11:(4):130
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  8. Arrow KJ. 1958.. Tinbergen on economic policy. . J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 53::89–97
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  9. Barrero JM, Bloom N, Davis SJ, Meyer BH. 2021.. COVID-19 is a persistent reallocation shock. . AEA Pap. Proc. 111::287–91
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  10. Basso LJ, Montero JP, Sepúlveda F. 2021.. A practical approach for curbing congestion and air pollution: driving restrictions with toll and vintage exemptions. . Transp. Res. A Policy Practice 148::330–52
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  11. Bento AM, Li S, Roth K. 2012.. Is there an energy paradox in fuel economy? A note on the role of consumer heterogeneity and sorting bias. . Econ. Lett. 115::44–48
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  12. Bernardo V, Fageda X, Flores-Fillol R. 2021.. Pollution and congestion in urban areas: the effects of low emission zones. . Econ. Transp. 26::100221
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  13. Bonilla JA. 2019.. The more stringent, the better? Rationing car use in Bogotá with moderate and drastic restrictions. . World Bank Econ. Rev. 33::516–34
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  14. Börjesson M, Bastian A, Eliasson J. 2021.. The economics of low emission zones. . Transp. Res. A Policy Practice 153::99–114
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  15. Börjesson M, Kristoffersson I. 2015.. The Gothenburg congestion charge. Effects, design and politics. . Transp. Res. A Policy Practice 75::134–146
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  16. Bovenberg AL, Goulder LH, Jacobsen MR. 2008.. Costs of alternative environmental policy instruments in the presence of industry compensation requirements. . J. Public Econ. 92::1236–53
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  17. Cerruti D, Alberini A, Linn J. 2019.. Charging drivers by the pound: How does the UK vehicle tax system affect CO2 emissions?. Environ. Resour. Econ. 74::99–129
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  18. Chamberlain RC, Fecht D, Davies B, Laverty AA. 2023.. Health effects of low emission and congestion charging zones: a systematic review. . Lancet Public Health 8::e559–74
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  19. Ciccone A, Soldani E. 2021.. Stick or carrot? Asymmetric responses to vehicle registration taxes in Norway. . Environ. Resour. Econ. 80::59–94
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  20. Conte Keivabu R, Rüttenauer T. 2022.. London congestion charge: the impact on air pollution and school attendance by socioeconomic status. . Popul. Environ. 43::576–96
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  21. Davis LW. 2008.. The effect of driving restrictions on air quality in Mexico City. . J. Political Econ. 116::38–81
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  22. Davis LW, Knittel CR. 2019.. Are fuel economy standards regressive?. J. Assoc. Environ. Resour. Econ. 6::S37–63
     [Google Scholar]
  23. De Borger B, Mulalic I, Rouwendal J. 2016.. Measuring the rebound effect with micro data: a first difference approach. . J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 79::1–17
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  24. Denant-Boemont L, Gaigné C, Gaté R. 2018.. Urban spatial structure, transport-related emissions and welfare. . J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 89::29–45
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  25. D'Haultfœuille X, Durrmeyer I, Février P. 2016.. Disentangling sources of vehicle emissions reduction in France: 2003–2008. . Int. J. Ind. Organ. 47::186–229
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  26. D'Haultfœuille X, Givord P, Boutin X. 2014.. The environmental effect of green taxation: the case of the French bonus/malus. . Econ. J. 124::F444–80
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  27. Durrmeyer I. 2022.. Winners and losers: the distributional effects of the French feebate on the automobile market. . Econ. J. 132::1414–48
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  28. Durrmeyer I, Martinez N. 2023.. The welfare consequences of urban traffic regulations. CEPR Discuss. Pap. 18332 , CEPR, Paris/London:. https://cepr.org/publications/dp18332
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Eliasson J, Hultkrantz L, Nerhagen L, Rosqvist LS. 2009.. The Stockholm congestion-charging trial 2006: overview of effects. . Transp. Res. A Policy Practice 43::240–50
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  30. Ellison RB, Greaves SP, Hensher DA. 2013.. Five years of London's low emission zone: effects on vehicle fleet composition and air quality. . Transp. Res. D Transp. Environ. 23::25–33
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  31. Fujita M, Ogawa H. 1982.. Multiple equilibria and structural transition of non-monocentric urban configurations. . Reg. Sci. Urban Econ. 12::161–96
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  32. Fuller R, Landrigan PJ, Balakrishnan K, Bathan G, Bose-O'Reilly S, et al. 2022.. Pollution and health: a progress update. . Lancet Planet. Health 6::e535–47
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  33. Gehrsitz M. 2017.. The effect of low emission zones on air pollution and infant health. . J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 83::121–44
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  34. Gerlagh R, Van Den Bijgaart I, Nijland H, Michielsen T. 2018.. Fiscal policy and CO2 emissions of new passenger cars in the EU. . Environ. Resour. Econ. 69::103–34
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  35. Gibson M, Carnovale M. 2015.. The effects of road pricing on driver behavior and air pollution. . J. Urban Econ. 89::62–73
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  36. Gillingham K, Iskhakov F, Munk-Nielsen A, Rust J, Schjerning B. 2022.. Equilibrium trade in automobiles. . J. Political Econ. 130::2534–93
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  37. Gillingham KT, Houde S, van Benthem AA. 2021.. Consumer myopia in vehicle purchases: evidence from a natural experiment. . Am. Econ. J. Econ. Policy 13::207–38
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  38. Glaeser E, Cutler D. 2021.. Survival of the City: Living and Thriving in an Age of Isolation. London:: Penguin Press
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Green CP, Heywood JS, Navarro M. 2016.. Traffic accidents and the London congestion charge. . J. Public Econ. 133::11–22
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  40. Green CP, Heywood JS, Paniagua MN. 2020.. Did the London congestion charge reduce pollution?. Reg. Sci. Urban Econ. 84::103573
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  41. Grigolon L, Leheyda N, Verboven F. 2016.. Scrapping subsidies during the financial crisis—evidence from Europe. . Int. J. Ind. Organ. 44::41–59
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  42. Grigolon L, Reynaert M, Verboven F. 2018.. Consumer valuation of fuel costs and tax policy: evidence from the European car market. . Am. Econ. J. Econ. Policy 10::193–225
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  43. Grossman GM, Krueger AB. 1995.. Economic growth and the environment. . Q. J. Econ. 110::353–77
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  44. Hart R. 2016.. Non-renewable resources in the long run. . J. Econ. Dyn. Control 71::1–20
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  45. Hart R. 2020.. Growth, pollution, policy!. Eur. Econ. Rev. 126::103455
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  46. Helm I, Koch N, Rohlf A. 2023.. The effects of cash for clunkers on local air quality. . J. Urban Econ. 138::103576
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  47. Holland SP, Kotchen MJ, Mansur ET, Yates AJ. 2022.. Why marginal CO2 emissions are not decreasing for US electricity: estimates and implications for climate policy. . PNAS 119::e2116632119
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  48. Huse C. 2018.. Fuel choice and fuel demand elasticities in markets with flex-fuel vehicles. . Nature Energy 3::582–88
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  49. Huse C, Koptyug N. 2022.. Salience and policy instruments: evidence from the auto market. . J. Assoc. Environ. Resour. Econ. 9::345–82
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Huse C, Lucinda C. 2014.. The market impact and the cost of environmental policy: evidence from the Swedish green car rebate. . Econ. J. 124::F393–419
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  51. Isaksen ET, Johansen BG. 2021.. Congestion pricing, air pollution, and individual-level behavioral responses. Work. Pap. , Univ. Oslo. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3832230
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Istamto T, Houthuijs D, Lebret E. 2014.. Willingness to pay to avoid health risks from road-traffic-related air pollution and noise across five countries. . Sci. Total Environ. 497–498::420–29
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  53. Jacobsen MR, Sallee JM, Shapiro JS, van Benthem AA. 2023.. Regulating untaxable externalities: Are vehicle air pollution standards effective and efficient?. Q. J. Econ. 138::1907–76
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  54. Jacobsen MR, van Benthem AA. 2015.. Vehicle scrappage and gasoline policy. . Am. Econ. Rev. 105::1312–38
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  55. Klier T, Linn J. 2016.. The effect of vehicle fuel economy standards on technology adoption. . J. Public Econ. 133::41–63
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  56. Klier T, Linn J, Zhou YC. 2020.. The effects of fuel prices and vehicle sales on fuel-saving technology adoption in passenger vehicles. . J. Econ. Manag. Strategy 29::543–78
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  57. Klößner S, Pfeifer G. 2018.. Synthesizing cash for clunkers: Stabilizing the car market, hurting the environment? MPRA Pap. 88175 , Munich Personal RePEc Arch, Munich, Ger.: https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/88175/
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Kyriakopoulou E, Lu T, Hart R. 2021.. Towards zero emissions from Swedish urban transport: report from the project ‘To buy or not to buy’. Rep. 7004 , Swed. Environ. Prot. Agency, Stockholm:. https://www.naturvardsverket.se/publikationer/7000/towards-zero-emissions-from-swedish-urban-transport/
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Kyriakopoulou E, Picard PM. 2021.. On the design of sustainable cities: local traffic pollution and urban structure. . J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 107::102443
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  60. Kyriakopoulou E, Picard PM. 2023.. The Zoom city: working from home, urban productivity and land use. . J. Econ. Geogr. 23::1397–437
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  61. Langer A, Maheshri V, Winston C. 2017.. From gallons to miles: a disaggregate analysis of automobile travel and externality taxes. . J. Public Econ. 152::34–46
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  62. Langer A, Miller NH. 2013.. Automakers’ short-run responses to changing gasoline prices. . Rev. Econ. Stat. 95::1198–1211
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  63. Leard B, Linn J, Zhou YC. 2023.. How much do consumers value fuel economy and performance? Evidence from technology adoption. . Rev. Econ. Stat. 105::158–74
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  64. Levinson A. 2009.. Technology, international trade, and pollution from US manufacturing. . Am. Econ. Rev. 99::2177–92
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  65. Li S, Xing J, Yang L, Zhang F. 2020.. Transportation and the environment in developing countries. . Annu. Rev. Resour. Econ. 12::389–409
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  66. Lin Y, Linn J. 2023.. Environmental regulation and product attributes: the case of European passenger vehicle greenhouse gas emissions standards. . J. Assoc. Environ. Resour. Econ. 10::1–32
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Lucas RE, Rossi-Hansberg E. 2002.. On the internal structure of cities. . Econometrica 70::1445–76
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  68. Lynas M. 2018.. Why President Macron's U-turn is a warning for climate leaders. . CNN Opinion, Dec. 31. https://edition.cnn.com/2018/12/31/opinions/macron-warning-climate-leaders/
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Mannberg A, Jansson J, Pettersson T, Brännlund R, Lindgren U. 2014.. Do tax incentives affect households’ adoption of ‘green’ cars? A panel study of the Stockholm congestion tax. . Energy Policy 74::286–99
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  70. Maus V, Werner TT. 2024.. Impacts for half of the world's mining areas are undocumented. . Nature 625::26–29
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  71. Miravete EJ, Moral MJ, Thurk J. 2018.. Fuel taxation, emissions policy, and competitive advantage in the diffusion of European diesel automobiles. . Rand J. Econ. 49::504–40
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  72. Nehiba C. 2024.. Electric vehicle usage, pollution damages, and the electricity price elasticity of driving. . J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 124::102915
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  73. Panteliadis P, Strak M, Hoek G, Weijers E, van der Zee S, Dijkema M. 2014.. Implementation of a low emission zone and evaluation of effects on air quality by long-term monitoring. . Atmos. Environ. 86::113–19
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  74. Parry IWH, Walls M, Harrington W. 2007.. Automobile externalities and policies. . J. Econ. Lit. 45::373–99
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  75. Pestel N, Wozny F. 2021.. Health effects of low emission zones: evidence from German hospitals. . J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 109::102512
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  76. Regnier C, Legras S. 2018.. Urban structure and environmental externalities. . Environ. Resour. Econ. 70::31–52
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  77. Reynaert M. 2021.. Abatement strategies and the cost of environmental regulation: emission standards on the European car market. . Rev. Econ. Stud. 88::454–88
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  78. Reynaert M, Sallee JM. 2021.. Who benefits when firms game corrective policies?. Am. Econ. J. Econ. Policy 13::372–412
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  79. Sallee JM. 2023.. Retiring old capital to foster decarbonization. . In Entrepreneurship and Innovation Policy and the Economy, Vol. 3, ed. B Jones, J Lerner , pp. 115–38. Cambridge, MA:: NBER
     [Google Scholar]
  80. Schindler M, Caruso G, Picard P. 2017.. Equilibrium and first-best city with endogenous exposure to local air pollution from traffic. . Reg. Sci. Urban Econ. 62::12–23
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  81. Shapiro JS, Walker R. 2018.. Why is pollution from US manufacturing declining? The roles of environmental regulation, productivity, and trade. . Am. Econ. Rev. 108::3814–54
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  82. Simeonova E, Currie J, Nilsson P, Walker R. 2021.. Congestion pricing, air pollution, and children's health. . J. Hum. Resour. 56::971–96
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  83. Soto JJ, Macea LF, Cantillo V. 2023.. Analysing a license plate-based vehicle restriction policy with optional exemption charge: the case in Cali, Colombia. . Transp. Res. A Policy Practice 170::103618
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  84. Stokey NL. 1998.. Are there limits to growth?. Int. Econ. Rev. 39::1–31
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  85. Tang CK, Van Ommeren J. 2022.. Accident externality of driving: evidence from the London Congestion Charge. . J. Econ. Geogr. 22::547–80
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  86. Torvanger A. 1991.. Manufacturing sector carbon-dioxide emissions in 9 OECD countries, 1973–87. . Energy Econ. 13::168–86
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  87. Verhoef ET, Nijkamp P. 2004.. Spatial externalities and the urban economy. . Contrib. Econ. Analysis 266::87–120
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  88. Wolff H. 2014.. Keep your clunker in the suburb: low-emission zones and adoption of green vehicles. . Econ. J. 124::F481–512
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  89. Yan S, Eskeland GS. 2018.. Greening the vehicle fleet: Norway's CO2-differentiated registration tax. . J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 91::247–62
     [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-resource-101623-101611
Loading
  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error