1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Resource Economics
  4. Volume 13, 2021
  5. Article

Annual Review of Resource Economics

Volume 13, 2021

Economic, Environmental, and Health Impacts of the Fracking Boom

Abstract

The shale gas boom revolutionized the energy sector through hydraulic fracturing (fracking). High levels of energy production force communities, states, and nations to consider the externalities and potential risks associated with this unconventional oil and natural gas development (UOGD). In this review, we systematically outline the environmental, economic, and anthropogenic impacts of UOGD, while also considering the diverse methodological approaches to these topics. We summarize the current status and conclusions of the academic literature, in both economic and related fields, while also providing suggested avenues for future research. Causal inference will continue to be important for the evaluation of UOGD costs and benefits. We conclude that current economic, global, and health forces may require researchers to revisit outcomes in the face of a potential shale bust.

Keyword(s): economic externalities, environmental, fracking, hydraulic fracturing, JEL Q3, JEL Q4, JEL Q5, JEL R1
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-resource-110320-092648
2021-10-05
2025-05-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/resource/13/1/annurev-resource-110320-092648.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-resource-110320-092648&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Acemoglu D, Hemous D, Barrage L, Aghion P. 2019. Climate change, directed innovation, and energy transition: the long-run consequences of the shale gas revolution. Meet. Pap. 1302 Soc. Econ. Dyn. https://ideas.repec.org/p/red/sed019/1302.html
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Allcott H, Keniston D. 2017. Dutch disease or agglomeration? The local economic effects of natural resource booms in modern America. Rev. Econ. Stud. 85:2695–731
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Allen DT. 2016. Emissions from oil and gas operations in the united states and their air quality implications. J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. 66:6549–75
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Allshouse WB, McKenzie LM, Barton K, Brindley S, Adgate JL. 2019. Community noise and air pollution exposure during the development of a multi-well oil and gas pad. Environ. Sci. Technol. 53:127126–35
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Alvarez RA, Zavala-Araiza D, Lyon DR, Allen DT, Barkley ZR et al. 2018. Assessment of methane emissions from the U.S. oil and gas supply chain. Science 361:6398186–88
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Angrist JD, Pischke JS. 2010. The credibility revolution in empirical economics: how better research design is taking the con out of econometrics. J. Econ. Perspect. 24:23–30
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Arezki R, Fetzer T, Pisch F. 2017. On the comparative advantage of U.S. manufacturing: evidence from the shale gas revolution. J. Int. Econ. 107:34–59
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Backstrom J. 2019. Strategic reporting and the effects of water use in hydraulic fracturing on local groundwater levels in Texas Work. Pap., Cent. Growth Oppor., Utah State Univ Logan: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/307177/
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Balthrop AT, Hawley Z. 2017. I can hear my neighbors’ fracking: the effect of natural gas production on housing values in Tarrant County, TX. Energy Econ 61:351–62
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Banzhaf HS, Ma L, Timmins C. 2019a. Environmental justice: establishing causal relationships. Annu. Rev. Resour. Econ. 11:377–98
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Banzhaf S, Ma L, Timmins C. 2019b. Environmental justice: the economics of race, place, and pollution. J. Econ. Perspect. 33:1185–208
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Bartik AW, Currie J, Greenstone M, Knittel CR. 2019. The local economic and welfare consequences of hydraulic fracturing. Am. Econ. J. Appl. Econ. 11:4105–55
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Barton EP, Pabian SE, Brittingham MC. 2016. Bird community response to Marcellus shale gas development. J. Wildlife Manag. 80:71301–13
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Becker GS. 1965. A theory of the allocation of time. Econ. J. 75:299493–517
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Beleche T, Cintina I. 2018. Fracking and risky behaviors: evidence from Pennsylvania. Econ. Hum. Biol. 31:69–82
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Black D, McKinnish T, Sanders S. 2005. The economic impact of the coal boom and bust. Econ. J. 115:503449–76
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Black KJ, McCoy SJ, Weber JG. 2018. When externalities are taxed: the effects and incidence of Pennsylvania's impact fee on shale gas wells. J. Assoc. Environ. Resour. Econ. 5:1107–53
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Black KJ, McCoy SJ, Weber JG. 2019. Fracking and indoor radon: Spurious correlation or cause for concern?. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 96:255–73
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Blackwill RD, O'Sullivan ML 2014. America's energy edge: the geopolitical consequences of the shale revolution. Foreign Aff 93:102–14
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Blundell W, Kokoza A. 2020. Natural gas flaring, respiratory health, and distributional effects Work. Pap. Calif. State Univ. East Bay Hayward: https://static1.squarespace.com/static/57525876e32140c54971248e/t/5eceb14db95b250db442ed26/1590604110440/FlaringHealthMay.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Boslett A, Guilfoos T, Lang C. 2016. Valuation of expectations: a hedonic study of shale gas development and New York's moratorium. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 77:14–30
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Boslett A, Guilfoos T, Lang C. 2019. Valuation of the external costs of unconventional oil and gas development: the critical importance of mineral rights ownership. J. Assoc. Environ. Resour. Econ. 6:3531–61
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Boslett A, Hill E. 2019. Shale gas transmission and housing prices. Resour. Energy Econ. 57:36–50
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Boslett A, Hill E 2021. Mortality during resource booms and busts Work. Pap. Univ Rochester, NY: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3815754
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Boslett A, Hill E, Ma L, Zhang L. 2021. Rural light pollution from shale gas development and associated sleep and subjective well-being. Resour. Energy Econ. 64:101220
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Brittingham MC, Maloney KO, Farag AM, Harper DD, Bowen ZH. 2014. Ecological risks of shale oil and gas development to wildlife, aquatic resources and their habitats. Environ. Sci. Technol. 48:1911034–47
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Brown JP. 2014. Production of natural gas from shale in local economies: A resource blessing or curse?. Econ. Rev. Q. 2014.5–33
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Brown JP, Fitzgerald T, Weber JG 2016. Capturing rents from natural resource abundance: private royalties from U.S. onshore oil & gas production. Resour. Energy Econ. 46:23–38
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Brown JP, Fitzgerald T, Weber JG 2019. Does resource ownership matter? Oil and gas royalties and the income effect of extraction. J. Assoc. Environ. Resour. Econ. 6:61039–64
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Brown SPA, Yücel MK. 2008. Deliverability and regional pricing in US natural gas markets. Energy Econ 30:52441–53
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Burnett JW, Mothorpe C. 2021. Human-induced earthquakes, risk salience, and housing values. Resour. Energy Econ. 63:101212
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Cai Z, Maguire K, Winters JV. 2019. Who benefits from local oil and gas employment? Labor market composition in the oil and gas industry in Texas and the rest of the United States. Energy Econ 84:104515
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Caron-Beaudoin É, Whitworth KW, Bosson-Rieutort D, Wendling G, Liu S, Verner MA. 2021. Density and proximity to hydraulic fracturing wells and birth outcomes in northeastern British Columbia, Canada. J. Expo. Sci. Environ. Epidemiol. 31:53–61
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Carpenter CW, Anderson D, Dudensing R 2019. The Texas drilling boom and local human capital investment. J. Agric. Appl. Econ. 51:2199–218
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Cascio EU, Narayan A. 2015. Who needs a fracking education? The educational response to low-skill biased technological change. NBER Work. Pap. 21359. https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w21359/w21359.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Casey JA, Ogburn EL, Rasmussen SG, Irving JK, Pollak J et al. 2015. Predictors of indoor radon concentrations in Pennsylvania, 1989–2013. Environ. Health Perspect. 123:111130–37
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Casey JA, Wilcox HC, Hirsch AG, Pollak J, Schwartz BS. 2018. Associations of unconventional natural gas development with depression symptoms and disordered sleep in Pennsylvania. Sci. Rep. 8:111375
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Cheung R, Wetherell D, Whitaker S 2018. Induced earthquakes and housing markets: evidence from Oklahoma. Reg. Sci. Urban Econ. 69:153–66
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Clay K, Jha A, Muller N, Walsh R. 2017. The external costs of transporting petroleum products by pipelines and rail: evidence from shipments of crude oil from North Dakota. NBER Work. Pap. 23852. https://www.nber.org/papers/w23852
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Coleman L. 2012. Explaining crude oil prices using fundamental measures. Energy Policy 40:318–24
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Covert TR, Kellogg R. 2017. Crude by rail, option value, and pipeline investment. NBER Work. Pap. 23855. https://www.nber.org/papers/w23855
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Cruz J, Smith PW, Stanley S. 2014. The Marcellus shale gas boom in Pennsylvania: employment and wage trends. Mon. Lab. Rev. 137:1–12
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Cullen JA, Mansur ET. 2017. Inferring carbon abatement costs in electricity markets: a revealed preference approach using the shale revolution. Am. Econ. J. Econ. Policy 9:3106–33
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Cunningham S, DeAngelo G, Smith B 2020. Fracking and risky sexual activity. J. Health Econ. 72:102322
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Currie J, Greenstone M, Meckel K. 2017. Hydraulic fracturing and infant health: new evidence from Pennsylvania. Sci. Adv. 3:12e1603021
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Cushing LJ, Vavra-Musser K, Chau K, Franklin M, Johnston JE. 2020. Flaring from unconventional oil and gas development and birth outcomes in the Eagle Ford Shale in south Texas. Environ. Health Perspect. 128:7077003
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Daraktchieva Z, Wasikiewicz JM, Howarth CB, Miller CA. 2020. Study of baseline radon levels in the context of a shale gas development. Sci. Total Environ. 753:141952
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Denham A, Willis MD, Croft D, Liu L, Hill EL. 2021. Acute myocardial infarction associated with unconventional natural gas development: a natural experiment. Environ. Res. 195:110872
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Deziel NC, Brokovich E, Grotto I, Clark CJ, Barnett-Itzhaki Z et al. 2020. Unconventional oil and gas development and health outcomes: a scoping review of the epidemiological research. Environ. Res. 182:109124
     [Google Scholar]
  50. DiSalvo R, Hill E, Zhang L. 2020. Implications of squeaky wheels: environmental justice and citizen complaints in oil and gas regulatory compliance. Paper presented at the Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management Fall Research Conference, online Nov. 11. https://appam.confex.com/appam/2020/meetingapp.cgi/Paper/36529
    [Google Scholar]
  51. EIA (US Energy Inf. Admin.) 2015. World shale resource assessments Rep. Ser., US Energy Inf. Admin. Washington, DC: https://www.eia.gov/analysis/studies/worldshalegas/
    [Google Scholar]
  52. EIA (US Energy Inf. Admin.) 2020a. Crude oil production EIA Data Series updated April 30, 2021. https://www.eia.gov/dnav/pet/PET_CRD_CRPDN_ADC_MBBLPD_A.htm
    [Google Scholar]
  53. EIA (US Energy Inf. Admin.) 2020b. Natural gas gross withdrawals and production EIA Data Series updated April 30, 2021. https://www.eia.gov/dnav/ng/NG_PROD_SUM_A_EPG0_FPD_MMCF_M.htm
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Emery JCH, Ferrer A, Green D. 2012. Long-term consequences of natural resource booms for human capital accumulation. Ind. Lab. Relat. Rev. 65:3708–34
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Ericson SJ, Kaffine DT, Maniloff P. 2020. Costs of increasing oil and gas setbacks are initially modest but rise sharply. Energy Policy 146:111749
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Farah N. 2016. Fracking and land productivity: the effects of hydraulic fracturing on agriculture. Paper presented at Implications of North American Energy Self-Sufficiency, 34th USAEE/IAEE North American Conference Oct 23–26
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Fell H, Kaffine DT. 2018. The fall of coal: joint impacts of fuel prices and renewables on generation and emissions. Am. Econ. J. Econ. Policy 10:290–116
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Ferreira S, Liu H, Brewer B. 2018. The housing market impacts of wastewater injection induced seismicity risk. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 92:251–69
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Feyrer J, Mansur ET, Sacerdote B. 2017. Geographic dispersion of economic shocks: evidence from the fracking revolution. Am. Econ. Rev. 107:41313–34
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Fisher MP, Mayer A, Vollet K, Hill EL, Haynes EN. 2018. Psychosocial implications of unconventional natural gas development: quality of life in Ohio's Guernsey and Noble Counties. J. Environ. Psychol. 55:90–98
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Fitzgerald T. 2014. Importance of mineral rights and royalty interests for rural residents and landowners. Choices 29:41–7
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Fitzgerald T, Kuwayama Y, Olmstead S, Thompson A. 2020. Dynamic impacts of US energy development on agricultural land use. Energy Policy 137:111163
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Fitzgerald T, Rucker RR. 2016. US private oil and natural gas royalties: estimates and policy relevance. OPEC Energy Rev 40:13–25
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Fry M, Briggle A, Kincaid J. 2015. Fracking and environmental (in)justice in a Texas city. Ecol. Econ. 117:97–107
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Garcia-Gonzales DA, Shonkoff SB, Hays J, Jerrett M 2019. Hazardous air pollutants associated with upstream oil and natural gas development: a critical synthesis of current peer-reviewed literature. Annu. Rev. Public Health 40:283–304
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Gibbons S, Heblich S, Lho E, Timmins C. 2016. Fear of fracking? The impact of the shale gas exploration on house prices in Britain. NBER Work. Pap. 22859. https://www.nber.org/papers/w22859
  67. Gittings RK, Roach T. 2020. Who benefits from a resource boom? Evidence from the Marcellus and Utica Shale plays. Energy Econ 87:104489
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Graff Zivin J, Neidell M. 2013. Environment, health, and human capital. J. Econ. Lit. 51:3689–730
     [Google Scholar]
  69. Hall PK, Hogan C. 2016. Understanding and negotiating pipeline easements Fact Sheet, Ohio State Univ. Ext., Columbus https://farmoffice.osu.edu/sites/aglaw/files/site-library/Understanding%20and%20Negotiating%20Pipeline%20Easements%20CommTech%20Copy.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Hanley N, Perrings C. 2019. The economic value of biodiversity. Annu. Rev. Resour. Econ. 11:355–75
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Hardy K, Kelsey TW. 2015. Local income related to Marcellus Shale activity in Pennsylvania. Community Dev 46:4329–40
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Harleman M, Weber JG, Berkowitz D. 2020. Environmental hazards and local investment: a half-century of evidence from abandoned oil and gas wells Work. Pap. 20-470 US Assoc. Energy Econ https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3692098
    [Google Scholar]
  73. Hastings K, Heller LR, Stephenson EF. 2017. Fracking and labor market conditions: a comparison of Pennsylvania and New York border counties. East. Econ. J. 43:4649–59
     [Google Scholar]
  74. Hausman C, Kellogg R. 2015. Welfare and distributional implications of shale gas. Brookings Pap. Econ. Act. 2015:71–125
     [Google Scholar]
  75. Hays J, McCawley M, Shonkoff SB. 2017. Public health implications of environmental noise associated with unconventional oil and gas development. Sci. Total Environ. 580:448–56
     [Google Scholar]
  76. He X, Lu N, Berrens RP. 2018. The case of the missing negative externality? Housing market effects of fracking in the Niobrara shale play, Colorado. J. Environ. Econ. Policy 7:3223–43
     [Google Scholar]
  77. Herrnstadt EM, Kellogg R, Lewis E 2020. The economics of time-limited development options: the case of oil and gas leases. NBER Work. Pap. 27165. https://www.nber.org/papers/w27165
  78. Hill E, Ma L. 2017. Shale gas development and drinking water quality. Am. Econ. Rev. 107:5522–25
     [Google Scholar]
  79. Hill EL. 2018. Shale gas development and infant health: evidence from Pennsylvania. J. Health Econ. 61:134–50
     [Google Scholar]
  80. Hill EL, Ma L. 2020. Drinking water, fracking, and infant health Work. Pap. Univ Rochester, NY:
     [Google Scholar]
  81. Hitaj C, Boslett A, Weber JG. 2014. Shale development and agriculture. Choices 29:41–7
     [Google Scholar]
  82. Hitaj C, Boslett AJ, Weber JG. 2020. Fracking, farming, and water. Energy Policy 146:111799
     [Google Scholar]
  83. Hitaj C, Weber JG, Erickson K. 2018. Ownership of oil and gas rights: implications for US farm income and wealth Rep. EIB-193, Econ. Res. Serv., US Dept. Agric. Washington, DC: https://www.ers.usda.gov/publications/pub-details/?pubid=89324
    [Google Scholar]
  84. Holladay JS, LaRiviere J. 2017. The impact of cheap natural gas on marginal emissions from electricity generation and implications for energy policy. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 85:205–27
     [Google Scholar]
  85. Hoy KA, Xiarchos IM, Kelsey TW, Brasier KJ, Glenna LL. 2018. Marcellus shale gas development and farming. Agric. Resour. Econ. Rev. 47:3634–64
     [Google Scholar]
  86. Ifft J, Yu A 2021. The impact of energy production on farmland markets: evidence from New York's 2008 hydraulic fracturing moratorium. Energy J 42:3 https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.42.3.jiff
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  87. IHS 2016. Minority and female employment in the oil & natural gas and petrochemical industries: 2015–2035 Rep., Am. Petrol. Inst. Washington, DC: https://www.api.org/∼/media/Files/Policy/Jobs/16-March-Women-Minorities-Jobs/Minority-and-Female-Employment-2015-2035.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  88. James AG, Smith B. 2020. Geographic dispersion of economic shocks: evidence from the fracking revolution: comment. Am. Econ. Rev. 110:61905–13
     [Google Scholar]
  89. Janitz AE, Dao HD, Campbell JE, Stoner JA, Peck JD. 2019. The association between natural gas well activity and specific congenital anomalies in Oklahoma, 1997–2009. Environ. Int. 122:381–88
     [Google Scholar]
  90. Ji Q, Guo JF 2015. Oil price volatility and oil-related events: an Internet concern study perspective. Appl. Energy 137:256–64
     [Google Scholar]
  91. Johnsen R, LaRiviere J, Wolff H. 2019. Fracking, coal, and air quality. J. Assoc. Environ. Resour. Econ. 6:51001–37
     [Google Scholar]
  92. Johnston JE, Chau K, Franklin M, Cushing L. 2020. Environmental justice dimensions of oil and gas flaring in South Texas: disproportionate exposure among Hispanic communities. Environ. Sci. Technol. 54:106289–98
     [Google Scholar]
  93. Juliusson LM, Doherty KE. 2017. Oil and gas development exposure and conservation scenarios for greater sage-grouse: combining spatially explicit modeling with GIS visualization provides critical information for management decisions. Appl. Geogr. 80:98–111
     [Google Scholar]
  94. Kaplan T. 2014. Citing health risks, Cuomo bans fracking in New York State. New York Times Dec. 17. https://www.nytimes.com/2014/12/18/nyregion/cuomo-to-ban-fracking-in-new-york-state-citing-health-risks.html
    [Google Scholar]
  95. Kearney MS, Wilson R. 2018. Male earnings, marriageable men, and nonmarital fertility: evidence from the fracking boom. Rev. Econ. Stat. 100:4678–90
     [Google Scholar]
  96. Keeler ZT, Stephens HM. 2020. Valuing shale gas development in resource-dependent communities. Resour. Policy 69:101821
     [Google Scholar]
  97. Kelly MG, Schafft KA. 2021. A “resource curse” for education? Deepening education disparities in Pennsylvania's shale gas boomtowns. Soc. Nat. Resour. 34:23–39
     [Google Scholar]
  98. Kiviat E. 2013. Risks to biodiversity from hydraulic fracturing for natural gas in the Marcellus and Utica shales. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1286:11–14
     [Google Scholar]
  99. Knittel CR, Metaxoglou K, Trindade A. 2019. Environmental implications of market structure: shale gas and electricity markets. Int. J. Ind. Organ. 63:511–50
     [Google Scholar]
  100. Koehler K, Ellis JH, Casey JA, Manthos D, Bandeen-Roche K et al. 2018. Exposure assessment using secondary data sources in unconventional natural gas development and health studies. Environ. Sci. Technol. 52:106061–69
     [Google Scholar]
  101. Komarek TM. 2016. Labor market dynamics and the unconventional natural gas boom: evidence from the Marcellus region. Resour. Energy Econ. 45:1–17
     [Google Scholar]
  102. Kroepsch AC, Maniloff PT, Adgate JL, McKenzie LM, Dickinson KL. 2019. Environmental justice in unconventional oil and natural gas drilling and production: a critical review and research agenda. Environ. Sci. Technol. 53:6601–15
     [Google Scholar]
  103. Krupnick A, Richardson N, Gottlieb M. 2015. Heterogeneity of state shale gas regulations. Econ. Energy Environ. Policy 4:153–68
     [Google Scholar]
  104. Krupnick AJ, Echarte I. 2017a. Economic impacts of unconventional oil and gas development Rep., Resour. Fut. Washington, DC: https://media.rff.org/documents/RFF-Rpt-ShaleReviews_Economic20Impacts_0.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  105. Krupnick AJ, Echarte I. 2017b. Housing market impacts of unconventional oil and gas development Rep., Resour. Fut. Washington, DC: https://media.rff.org/documents/RFF-Rpt-ShaleReviews_Housing_0.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  106. Lade GE, Rudik I. 2020. Costs of inefficient regulation: evidence from the Bakken. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 102:102336
     [Google Scholar]
  107. Lange I, Redlinger M. 2019. Effects of stricter environmental regulations on resource development. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 96:60–87
     [Google Scholar]
  108. Langlois LA, Drohan PJ, Brittingham MC. 2017. Linear infrastructure drives habitat conversion and forest fragmentation associated with Marcellus shale gas development in a forested landscape. J. Environ. Manag. 197:167–76
     [Google Scholar]
  109. Linn J, Muehlenbachs L. 2018. The heterogeneous impacts of low natural gas prices on consumers and the environment. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 89:1–28
     [Google Scholar]
  110. Livy MR, Gopalakrishnan S, Klaiber HA, Roe BE. 2018. The impact of intensity on perceived risk from unconventional shale gas development. J. Environ. Manag. 218:630–38
     [Google Scholar]
  111. Loomis J, Haefele M. 2017. Quantifying market and non-market benefits and costs of hydraulic fracturing in the United States: a summary of the literature. Ecol. Econ. 138:160–67
     [Google Scholar]
  112. Malin SA. 2020. Depressed democracy, environmental injustice: exploring the negative mental health implications of unconventional oil and gas production in the United States. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 70:101720
     [Google Scholar]
  113. Maniloff P, Mastromonaco R. 2017. The local employment impacts of fracking: a national study. Resour. Energy Econ. 49:62–85
     [Google Scholar]
  114. Marchand J, Weber JG. 2020. How local economic conditions affect school finances, teacher quality, and student achievement: evidence from the Texas shale boom. J. Policy Anal. Manag. 39:136–63
     [Google Scholar]
  115. Mason CF, Muehlenbachs LA, Olmstead SM. 2015. The economics of shale gas development. Annu. Rev. Resour. Econ. 7:269–89
     [Google Scholar]
  116. Matz J, Renfrew D. 2015. Selling “fracking”: energy in depth and the Marcellus Shale. Environ. Commun. 9:3288–306
     [Google Scholar]
  117. Mayfield EN, Cohon JL, Muller NZ, Azevedo IM, Robinson AL. 2019. Cumulative environmental and employment impacts of the shale gas boom. Nat. Sustain. 2:121122–31
     [Google Scholar]
  118. McKenzie LM, Allshouse WB, Byers TE, Bedrick EJ, Serdar B, Adgate JL. 2017. Childhood hematologic cancer and residential proximity to oil and gas development. PLOS ONE 12:2e0170423
     [Google Scholar]
  119. Meng Q. 2014. Modeling and prediction of natural gas fracking pad landscapes in the Marcellus Shale region, USA. Landsc. Urban Plan. 121:109–16
     [Google Scholar]
  120. Meng Q. 2017. The impacts of fracking on the environment: a total environmental study paradigm. Sci. Total Environ. 580:953–57
     [Google Scholar]
  121. Mohai P, Pellow D, Roberts JT. 2009. Environmental justice. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 34:405–30
     [Google Scholar]
  122. Molloy R, Smith CL, Wozniak A. 2017. Job changing and the decline in long-distance migration in the United States. Demography 54:2631–53
     [Google Scholar]
  123. Morissette R, Chan PCW, Lu Y. 2015. Wages, youth employment, and school enrollment: recent evidence from increases in world oil prices. J. Hum. Resour. 50:1222–53
     [Google Scholar]
  124. Muehlenbachs L, Spiller E, Timmins C. 2015. The housing market impacts of shale gas development. Am. Econ. Rev. 105:123633–59
     [Google Scholar]
  125. Muehlenbachs L, Staubli S, Chu Z. 2017. The accident externality from trucking. NBER Work. Pap. 23791. https://www.nber.org/papers/w23791
    [Google Scholar]
  126. Munasib A, Rickman DS. 2015. Regional economic impacts of the shale gas and tight oil boom: a synthetic control analysis. Reg. Sci. Urban Econ. 50:1–17
     [Google Scholar]
  127. Newell RG, Raimi D. 2015. Shale public finance: local government revenues and costs associated with oil and gas development. NBER Work. Pap. 21542. https://www.nber.org/papers/w21542
  128. Northrup JM, Anderson CR Jr., Wittemyer G 2015. Quantifying spatial habitat loss from hydrocarbon development through assessing habitat selection patterns of mule deer. Glob. Change Biol. 21:113961–70
     [Google Scholar]
  129. Ordin A. 2019. Investment and taxation: the case of oil and gas in the Permian Basin Work. Pap. Dep. Econ., Duke Univ. Durham, NC: https://economics.sas.upenn.edu/system/files/2020-01/ordin_jmp.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  130. Paulik LB, Hobbie KA, Rohlman D, Smith BW, Scott RP et al. 2018. Environmental and individual PAH exposures near rural natural gas extraction. Environ. Pollut. 241:397–405
     [Google Scholar]
  131. Peischl J, Ryerson T, Aikin K, De Gouw J, Gilman J et al. 2015. Quantifying atmospheric methane emissions from the Haynesville, Fayetteville, and northeastern Marcellus shale gas production regions. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos. 120:52119–39
     [Google Scholar]
  132. Peng L, Meyerhoefer C, Chou SY. 2018. The health implications of unconventional natural gas development in Pennsylvania. Health Econ 27:6956–83
     [Google Scholar]
  133. Rakitan TJ. 2018. The impact of the U.S. shale boom on agriculture: evidence from North Dakota Work. Pap., Dep. Econ., Valparaiso Univ. Valparaiso, IN:
     [Google Scholar]
  134. Rasmussen SG, Ogburn EL, McCormack M, Casey JA, Bandeen-Roche K et al. 2016. Association between unconventional natural gas development in the Marcellus Shale and asthma exacerbations. JAMA Intern. Med. 176:91334–43
     [Google Scholar]
  135. Ricardo D 1821. On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation London: John Murray
     [Google Scholar]
  136. Richter J, Salanguit A, James A. 2018. The (uneven) spatial distribution of the Bakken oil boom. Land Econ 94:4577–92
     [Google Scholar]
  137. Rickman DS, Wang H, Winters JV. 2017. Is shale development drilling holes in the human capital pipeline?. Energy Econ 62:283–90
     [Google Scholar]
  138. Sances MW, You HY. 2017. Economic shocks, targeted transfers, and local public goods: evidence from US shale gas boom. Paper presented at the Political Institutions and Economic Policy Conference Bloomington, IN: May 13. http://dlc.dlib.indiana.edu/dlc/bitstream/handle/10535/10326/sances_you_fracking.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  139. Shrestha N, Chilkoor G, Wilder J, Gadhamshetty V, Stone JJ. 2017. Potential water resource impacts of hydraulic fracturing from unconventional oil production in the Bakken shale. Water Res 108:1–24
     [Google Scholar]
  140. Smith B, Wills S. 2018. Left in the dark? Oil and rural poverty. J. Assoc. Environ. Resour. Econ. 5:4865–904
     [Google Scholar]
  141. Thakor RT. 2018. Liquidity windfalls and reallocation: evidence from farming and fracking Work. Pap Univ Minn./MIT: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2891409
    [Google Scholar]
  142. Timmins C, Vissing A. 2015. Environmental justice and Coasian bargaining: the role of race and income in lease negotiations for shale gas Work. Pap. Duke Univ Durham, NC/Univ. Chic: https://sites.duke.edu/christophertimmins/files/2017/02/environmental-justice-coasian.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  143. Torres L, Yadav OP, Khan E. 2016. A review on risk assessment techniques for hydraulic fracturing water and produced water management implemented in onshore unconventional oil and gas production. Sci. Total Environ. 539:478–93
     [Google Scholar]
  144. Tran KV, Casey JA, Cushing LJ, Morello-Frosch R. 2020. Residential proximity to oil and gas development and birth outcomes in California: a retrospective cohort study of 2006–2015 births. Environ. Health Perspect. 128:67
     [Google Scholar]
  145. US DOE (US Dep. Energy) 2013. U.S. energy sector vulnerabilities to climate change and extreme weather Rep., US Dep. Energy Washington, DC: https://apps.dtic.mil/sti/pdfs/ADA583709.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  146. US EPA (US Environ. Prot. Agency 2016. Hydraulic fracturing for oil and gas: Impacts from the hydraulic fracturing water cycle on drinking water resources in the United States (final report) Rep. EPA/600/R-16/236F US Environ. Prot. Agency Washington, DC: https://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/hfstudy/recordisplay.cfm?deid=332990
    [Google Scholar]
  147. US EPA (US Environ. Prot. Agency) 2020. Unconventional oil and gas development US Environ. Prot. Agency Washington, DC: https://www.epa.gov/uog
    [Google Scholar]
  148. Vissing A. 2015. Private contracts as regulation: a study of private lease negotiations using the Texas natural gas industry. Agric. Resour. Econ. Rev. 44:2120–37
     [Google Scholar]
  149. Vissing A. 2017. One-to-many matching with complementary preferences: an empirical study of natural gas lease quality and market power Work. Pap Univ Chic: https://wpcarey.asu.edu/sites/default/files/vissing_2017.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  150. Warner B, Shapiro J. 2013. Fractured, fragmented federalism: a study in fracking regulatory policy. Publius J. Fed. 43:3474–96
     [Google Scholar]
  151. Weber JG. 2012. The effects of a natural gas boom on employment and income in Colorado, Texas, and Wyoming. Energy Econ 34:1580–88
     [Google Scholar]
  152. Weber JG. 2013. A decade of natural gas development: The makings of a resource curse?. Resour. Energy Econ. 37:168–83
     [Google Scholar]
  153. Weber JG, Burnett JW, Xiarchos IM. 2016a. Broadening benefits from natural resource extraction: housing values and taxation of natural gas wells as property. J. Policy Anal. Manag. 35:3587–614
     [Google Scholar]
  154. Weber JG, Wang Y, Chomas M. 2016b. A quantitative description of state-level taxation of oil and gas production in the continental US. Energy Policy 96:289–301
     [Google Scholar]
  155. Weingarten M, Ge S, Godt JW, Bekins BA, Rubinstein JL. 2015. High-rate injection is associated with the increase in U.S. mid-continent seismicity. Science 348:62411336–40
     [Google Scholar]
  156. Willis M, Hill EL, Boslett A, Kile M, Carozza S, Hystad P. 2020a. Impacts of in utero exposure to oil and gas drilling on markers of intrauterine growth restriction among term infants: a difference-in-differences analysis. Environ. Health Perspect In press
    [Google Scholar]
  157. Willis M, Hill EL, Kile M, Carozza S, Hystad P 2020b. Associations between residential proximity to oil and gas extraction and hypertensive conditions during pregnancy: a difference-in-differences analysis in Texas, 1996–2009 Work. Pap., Or. State Univ. Corvallis:
     [Google Scholar]
  158. Willis MD, Jusko TA, Halterman JS, Hill EL. 2018. Unconventional natural gas development and pediatric asthma hospitalizations in Pennsylvania. Environ. Res. 166:402–8
     [Google Scholar]
  159. Willyard KA, Schade GW. 2019. Flaring in two Texas shale areas: comparison of bottom-up with top-down volume estimates for 2012 to 2015. Sci. Total Environ. 691:243–51
     [Google Scholar]
  160. Wilson R. 2020a. Moving to economic opportunity: the migration response to the fracking boom. J. Hum. Resour. https://doi.org/10.3368/jhr.57.3.0817-8989R2
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  161. Wilson R 2020b. Moving to jobs: the role of information in migration decisions. J. Labor Econ In press. https://doi.org/10.1086/713008
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  162. Wrenn DH, Klaiber HA, Jaenicke EC. 2016. Unconventional shale gas development, risk perceptions, and averting behavior: evidence from bottled water purchases. J. Assoc. Environ. Resour. Econ. 3:4779–817
     [Google Scholar]
  163. Xu M, Xu Y. 2020. Fraccidents: the impact of fracking on road traffic deaths. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 101:102303
     [Google Scholar]
  164. Xu Y, Sajja M, Kumar A 2019. Impact of the hydraulic fracturing on indoor radon concentrations in Ohio: a multilevel modeling approach. Front. Public Health 7:76
     [Google Scholar]
  165. Yao L, Sui B. 2020. Heterogeneous preferences for shale water management: evidence from a choice experiment in Fuling shale gas field, southwest China. Energy Policy 147:111831
     [Google Scholar]
  166. Zavala-Araiza D, Lyon DR, Alvarez RA, Davis KJ, Harriss R et al. 2015. Reconciling divergent estimates of oil and gas methane emissions. PNAS 112:5115597–602
     [Google Scholar]
  167. Zhang R, Li H, Khanna N, Sullivan D, Krupnick A, Hill E. 2019. Air pollution impacts of shale gas development in Pennsylvania. Paper presented at the 2019 Annual Meeting of the Agricultural and Applied Economics Association Atlanta, GA: July 21–23 https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/290817/files/Abstracts_19_05_14_13_40_12_57__149_125_109_45_0.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
  168. Zuo N, Schieffer J, Buck S. 2019. The effect of the oil and gas boom on schooling decisions in the U.S. Resour. Energy Econ 55:1–23
     [Google Scholar]
  169. Zwickl K. 2019. The demographics of fracking: a spatial analysis for four US states. Ecol. Econ. 161:202–15
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-resource-110320-092648
Loading
Economic, Environmental, and Health Impacts of the Fracking Boom
Annual Review of Resource Economics 13, 311 (2021); https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-resource-110320-092648
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-resource-110320-092648
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-resource-110320-092648
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error