1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Food Science and Technology
  4. Volume 13, 2022
  5. Article

Annual Review of Food Science and Technology

Volume 13, 2022

Current Perspectives on Food Oral Processing

Abstract

Food oral processing (FOP) is a fast-emerging research area in the food science discipline. Since its first introduction about a decade ago, a large amount of literature has been published in this area, forming new frontiers and leading to new research opportunities. This review aims to summarize FOP research progress from current perspectives. Food texture, food flavor (aroma and taste), bolus swallowing, and eating behavior are covered in this review. The discussion of each topic is organized into three parts: a short background introduction, reflections on current research findings and achievements, and future directions and implications on food design. Physical, physiological, and psychological principles are the main concerns of discussion for each topic. The last part of the review shares views on the research challenges and outlooks of future FOP research. It is hoped that the review not only helps readers comprehend what has been achieved in the past decade but also, more importantly, identify where the knowledge gaps are and in which direction the FOP research will go.

Keyword(s): bolus swallowing, eating behavior, food flavor, food oral processing, food sensory, food texture, oral physiology
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-food-052720-103054
2022-03-25
2024-04-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/food/13/1/annurev-food-052720-103054.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-food-052720-103054&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Andablo-Reyes E, Bryant M, Neville A, Hyde P, Sarkar R et al. 2020. 3D biomimetic tongue-emulating surfaces for tribological applications. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 12:4449371–85
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Aubert B, Lima A, Le Révérend B 2016. Biophysical basis of taste modulation by viscous solutions in humans. Food Hydrocoll. 60:494–99
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Boehm MW, Yakubov GE, Stokes JR, Baier SK. 2020. The role of saliva in oral processing: reconsidering the breakdown path paradigm. J. Texture Stud. 50:167–77
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Bojanowski V, Hummel T. 2013. Retronasal perception of odors. Physiol. Behav. 107:484–87
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Bolhuis DP, Forde CG. 2020. Application of food texture to moderate oral processing behaviors and energy intake. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 106:445–56
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Bourne M. 2002. Food Texture and Viscosity: Concept and Measurements San Diego: Acad. Press. , 2nd ed..
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Brewsaugh AM, Brust LJ, Hartman J. 2021. Implementing the international dysphagia diet standardization initiative: opportunities for change. J. Acad. Nutr. Diet. In press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jand.2021.02.012
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  8. Brossard N, Cai H, Osorio F, Bordeu E, Chen J 2016.. “ Oral” tribological study on the astringency sensation of red wines. J. Texture Stud. 47:5392–402
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Busch JLHC, Tournier C, Knoop JE, Kooyman G, Smit G 2009. Temporal contrast of salt delivery in mouth increases salt perception. Chem. Senses 34:4341–48
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Cai H, Li Y, Chen J 2017. Rheology and tribology study of the sensory perception of oral care products. Biotribology 10:17–25
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Çakir E, Koç H, Vinyard CJ, Essick G, Daubert CR et al. 2012. Evaluation of texture changes due to compositional differences using oral processing: evaluation of texture using oral processing. J. Texture Stud. 43:4257–67
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Çakır E, Vinyard CJ, Essick G, Daubert CR, Drake M, Foegeding EA 2012. Interrelations among physical characteristics, sensory perception and oral processing of protein-based soft-solid structures. Food Hydrocoll 29:1234–45
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Campbell CL, Wagoner TB, Foegeding EA. 2017. Designing foods for satiety: the roles of food structure and oral processing in satiation and satiety. Food Struct 13:1–12
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Carpenter G, Cleaver L, Blakeley M, Hasbullah N, Houghton J, Gardener A. 2019. Wine astringency reduces flavor intensity of Brussels sprouts. J. Texture Stud. 50:171–74
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Chen J. 2009. Food oral processing—a review. Food Hydrocoll 23:11–25
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Chen J. 2012. Bolus formation and swallowing. Food Oral Processing, eds. J Chen, L Engelen 139–56 Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Chen J. 2020. It is important to differentiate sensory property from the material property. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 96:268–70
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Chen J, Liu Z, Prakash S. 2014. Lubrication studies of fluid food using a simple experimental set up. Food Hydrocoll. 42:100–5
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Chen J, Stokes JR 2012. Rheology and tribology: two distinctive regimes of food texture sensation. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 25:14–12
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Chen W, Hadde EK, Chen J. 2021. Development of a ball back extrusion technique for texture analysis of fluid food. J. Texture Stud. 52:461–69
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Chong PH, Chen J, Yin D, Upadhyay R, Mo L, Han L. 2019.. “ Oral” tribology study on saliva-tea compound mixtures: correlation between sweet aftertaste (Huigan) perception and friction coefficient. Food Res. Int. 125:108642
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Cichero JAY. 2020. Evaluating chewing function: expanding the dysphagia field using food oral processing and the IDDSI framework. J. Texture Stud. 51:156–66
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Cichero JAY, Lam P, Steele CM, Hanson B, Chen J et al. 2017. Development of international terminology and definitions for texture-modified foods and thickened fluids used in dysphagia management: the IDDSI framework. Dysphagia 32:2293–314
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Dresselhuis DM, de Hoog EHA, Cohen Stuart MA, Vingerhoeds MH, van Aken GA 2008. The occurrence of in-mouth coalescence of emulsion droplets in relation to perception of fat. Food Hydrocoll 22:61170–83
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Feng Y, Licandro H, Martin C, Septier C, Zhao M et al. 2018. The associations between biochemical and microbiological variables and taste differ in whole saliva and in the film lining the tongue. BioMed Res. Int. 2018:2838052
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Feron G. 2019. Unstimulated saliva: background noise in taste molecules. J. Texture Stud. 50:16–18
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Feron G, Ayed C, Qannari EM, Courcoux P, Laboure H, Guichard E. 2014. Understanding aroma release from model cheeses by a statistical multiblock approach on oral processing. PLOS ONE 9:4e93113
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Fiszman S, Tarrega A. 2018. The dynamics of texture perception of hard solid food: a review of the contribution of the temporal dominance of sensations technique. J. Texture Stud. 49:2202–12
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Foegeding EA, Stieger M, van de Velde F. 2017. Moving from molecules, to structure, to texture perception. Food Hydrocoll 68:31–42
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Friedman HH, Whitney JE, Szczesniak AS 1963. The texturometer—a new instrument for objective texture measurement. J. Food Sci. 28:390–96
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Fuhrmann PL, Kalisvaart LCM, Sala G, Scholten E, Stieger M. 2019. Clustering of oil droplets in o/w emulsions enhances perception of oil-related sensory attributes. Food Hydrocoll. 97:105215
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Funami T, Matsuyama S, Ikegami A, Nakauma M, Hori K, Ono T. 2017. In vivo measurement of swallowing by monitoring thyroid cartilage movement in healthy subjects using thickened liquid samples and its comparison with sensory evaluation. J. Texture Stud. 48:6494–506
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Funami T, Nakao S, Isono M, Ishihara S, Nakauma M. 2016. Effects of food consistency on perceived intensity and eating behavior using soft gels with varying aroma inhomogeneity. Food Hydrocoll. 52:896–905
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Gallegos C, Turcanu M, Assegehegn G, Brito-de la Fuente E. 2021. Rheological issues on oropharyngeal dysphagia. Dysphagia In press. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-021-10337-w
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  35. Gao Z, Kohyama K. 2014. Ultrasound pulsed wave Doppler imaging of the esophagus illustrates the effects of water volume on bolus kinematics. J. Texture Stud. 45:5335–43
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Genovese A, Caporaso N, Civitella A, Sacchi R 2014. Effect of human saliva and sip volume of coffee brews on the release of key volatile compounds by a retronasal aroma simulator. Food Res. Int. 61:100–11
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Glumac M, Qin L, Chen J, Ritzoulis C 2019a. Saliva could act as an emulsifier during oral processing of oil/fat. J. Texture Stud. 50:183–89
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Glumac M, Ritzoulis C, Chen J. 2019b. Surface properties of adsorbed salivary components at a solid hydrophobic surface using a quartz crystal microbalance with dissipation (QCM-D). Food Hydrocoll 97:105195
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Goh AT, Choy JYM, Chua XH, Ponnalagu S, Khoo CM et al. 2021. Increased oral processing and a slower eating rate increase glycaemic, insulin and satiety responses to a mixed meal tolerance test. Eur. J. Nutr. 60:2719–33
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Gonçalves TMSV, Schimmel M, van der Bilt A, Chen J, van der Glas HW, Kohyama K et al. 2021. Consensus on the terminologies and methodologies for masticatory assessment. J. Oral Rehabil. 48:745–61
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Gray-Stuart EM, Jones JR, Bronlund JE. 2017. Defining the end-point of mastication: a conceptual model. J. Texture Stud. 48:5345–56
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Guichard E, Repoux M, Qannari EM, Laboure H, Feron G. 2017. Model cheese aroma perception is explained not only by in vivo aroma release but also by salivary composition and oral processing parameters. Food Funct 8:2615–28
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Hadde EK, Chen J. 2021. Texture and texture assessment of thickened fluids and texture-modified food for dysphagia management. J. Texture Stud. 52:14–15
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Hadde EK, Cichero JAY, Zhao S, Chen W, Chen J 2019. The importance of extensional rheology in bolus control during swallowing. Sci. Rep. 9:116106
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Hermsen S, Frost JH, Robinson E, Higgs S, Mars M, Hermans RCJ 2016. Evaluation of a smart fork to decelerate eating rate. J. Acad. Nutr. Diet. 116:71066–68
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Houghton JW, Carpenter G, Hans J, Pesaro M, Lynham S, Proctor G. 2020. Agonists of orally expressed TRP channels stimulate salivary secretion and modify the salivary proteome. Mol. Cell. Proteom. 19:101644–76
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Hu X, Karthik P, Chen J 2019. Manipulating oral behaviour of food emulsions using different emulsifiers. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 54:72408–15
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Hu X, Karthik P, Chen J 2021. Enhanced oral oil release and mouthfeel perception of starch emulsion gels. Food Res. Int. 144:110356
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Ishihara S, Isono M, Nakao S, Nakauma M, Funami T et al. 2014. Instrumental uniaxial compression test of gellan gels of various mechanical properties using artificial tongue and its comparison with human oral strategy for the first size reduction: instrumental evaluation of food texture. J. Texture Stud. 45:5354–66
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Ishihara S, Nakao S, Nakauma M, Funami T, Hori K et al. 2013. Compression test of food gels on artificial tongue and its comparison with human test: in vitro evaluation system of food texture. J. Texture Stud. 44:2104–14
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Kamiya T, Toyama Y, Hanyu K, Takai M, Kikuchi T et al. 2019. Numerical visualisation of physical values during human swallowing using a three-dimensional swallowing simulator ‘Swallow Vision®’ based on the moving particle simulation method. Part 1: quantification of velocity, shear rate and viscosity during swallowing. Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Eng. Imaging Vis. 7:4382–88
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Ketel EC, de Wijk RA, de Graaf C, Stieger M. 2020. Relating oral physiology and anatomy of consumers varying in age, gender and ethnicity to food oral processing behavior. Physiol. Behav. 215:112766
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Ketel EC, Zhang Y, Jia J, Wang X, de Wijk RA et al. 2021. Comparison of and relationships between oral physiology, anatomy and food oral processing behavior of Chinese (Asian) and Dutch (Caucasian) consumers differing in age. Physiol. Behav. 232:113284
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Kikuchi T, Michiwaki Y, Kamiya T, Toyama Y, Tamai T, Koshizuka S 2015. Human swallowing simulation based on videofluorography images using Hamiltonian MPS method. Comp. Part. Mech. 2:3247–60
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Kikuchi T, Michiwaki Y, Koshizuka S, Kamiya T, Toyama Y 2017. Numerical simulation of interaction between organs and food bolus during swallowing and aspiration. Comput. Biol. Med. 80:114–23
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Kistler T, Pridal A, Bourcet C, Denkel C. 2021. Modulation of sweetness perception in confectionary applications. Food Qual. Preferences 88:104087
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Koç H, Çakir E, Vinyard CJ, Essick G, Daubert CR et al. 2014. Adaptation of oral processing to the fracture properties of soft solids. J. Texture Stud. 45:147–61
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Koç H, Drake M, Vinyard CJ, Essick G, van de Velde F, Foegeding EA. 2019. Emulsion filled polysaccharide gels: filler particle effects on material properties, oral processing, and sensory texture. Food Hydrocoll. 94:311–25
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Kohyama K. 2015. Oral sensing of food properties. J. Texture Stud. 46:3138–51
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Kohyama K, Gao Z, Watanabe T, Ishihara S, Nakao S, Funami T. 2017. Relationships between mechanical properties obtained from compression test and electromyography variables during natural oral processing of gellan gum gels. J. Texture Stud. 48:166–75
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Kohyama K, Hayakawa F, Gao Z, Ishihara S, Funami T, Nishinari K 2016. Natural eating behavior of two types of hydrocolloid gels as measured by electromyography: quantitative analysis of mouthful size effects. Food Hydrocoll 52:243–52
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Konitzer K, Pflaum T, Oliveira P, Arendt E, Koehler P, Hofmann T. 2013. Kinetics of sodium release from wheat bread crumb as affected by sodium distribution. J. Agric. Food Chem. 61:4510659–69
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Krop EM, Hetherington MM, Holmes M, Miquel S, Sarkar A 2019. On relating rheology and oral tribology to sensory properties in hydrogels. Food Hydrocoll. 88:101–13
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Krop EM, Hetherington MM, Miquel S, Sarkar A 2020. Oral processing of hydrogels: influence of food material properties versus individuals’ eating capability. J. Texture Stud. 51:1144–53
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Kupirovič UP, Elmadfa I, Juillerat M-A, Raspor P. 2017. Effect of saliva on physical food properties in fat texture perception. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 57:61061–77
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Laguna L, Farrell G, Bryant M, Morina A, Sarkar A 2017. Relating rheology and tribology of commercial dairy colloids to sensory perception. Food Funct. 8:2563–73
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Laguna L, Fiszman S, Tarrega A. 2021. Saliva matters: reviewing the role of saliva in the rheology and tribology of liquid and semisolid foods. Relation to in-mouth perception. Food Hydrocoll. 116:106660
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Lamy E, Santos V, Barrambana S, Simões C, Carreira L et al. 2021. Saliva protein composition relates with interindividual variations in bread sensory ratings. Starch Stärke 73:1–22000052
     [Google Scholar]
  69. Larsen DS, Tang JY, Ferguson L, Morgenstern MP, James BJ 2016a. Oral breakdown of texturally complex gel-based model food. J. Texture Stud. 47:3169–80
     [Google Scholar]
  70. Larsen DS, Tang JY, Ferguson L, Morgenstern MP, James BJ 2016b. Textural complexity is a food property—shown using model foods. Inter. J. Food Prop. 19:1544–55
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Lasschuijt M, Mars M, de Graaf C, Smeets PAM. 2020. How oro-sensory exposure and eating rate affect satiation and associated endocrine responses—a randomized trial. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 111:61137–49
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Lasschuijt MP, Brouwer-Brolsma E, Mars M, Siebelink E, Feskens E et al. 2021. Concept development and use of an automated food intake and eating behavior assessment method. J. Vis. Exp. 168:e62144
     [Google Scholar]
  73. Lasschuijt MP, Mars M, Stieger M, Miquel-Kergoat S, de Graaf C, Smeets P. 2017. Comparison of oro-sensory exposure duration and intensity manipulations on satiation. Physiol. Behav. 176:76–83
     [Google Scholar]
  74. Li Y, Han K, Wan Z, Yang X. 2020. Salt reduction in semi-solid food gel via inhomogeneous distribution of sodium-containing coacervate: effect of gum arabic. Food Hydrocoll. 109:106102
     [Google Scholar]
  75. Lillford P. 2018. Texture and breakdown in the mouth: an industrial research approach. J. Texture Stud. 49:2213–18
     [Google Scholar]
  76. Lillford PJ. 2011. The importance of food microstructure in fracture physics and texture perception. J. Texture Stud. 42:2130–36
     [Google Scholar]
  77. Liu H, Wang X, Chen J, van der Glas H. 2020. The influence of breakage on the initial size reduction during chewing of a solid test food. Arch. Oral Biol. 118:104852
     [Google Scholar]
  78. Liu T, Wang X, Chen J, van der Glas H. 2018. Determining chewing efficiency using a solid test food and considering all phases of mastication. Arch. Oral Biol. 91:63–77
     [Google Scholar]
  79. Luo N, Ye A, Wolber FM, Singh H. 2019. Structure of whey protein emulsion gels containing capsaicinoids: impact on in-mouth breakdown behaviour and sensory perception. Food Hydrocoll. 92:19–29
     [Google Scholar]
  80. Luo N, Ye A, Wolber FM, Singh H. 2020. In-mouth breakdown behaviour and sensory perception of emulsion gels containing active or inactive filler particles loaded with capsaicinoids. Food Hydrocoll. 108:106076
     [Google Scholar]
  81. Lv C, Wang X, Chen J, Yang N, Fisk I 2019. A non-invasive measurement of tongue surface temperature. Food Res. Int. 116:499–507
     [Google Scholar]
  82. Ma W, Zhang D, Hu M, Wilde PJ, Wu J et al. 2021. Comparison of oral physiological and salivary rheological properties of Chinese Mongolian and Han young adults. Arch. Oral Biol. 123:105033
     [Google Scholar]
  83. Maeda R, Takei E, Ito K, Magara J, Tsujimura T, Inoue M. 2020. Inter-individual variation of bolus properties in triggering swallowing during chewing in healthy humans. J. Oral Rehabil. 47:91161–70
     [Google Scholar]
  84. Mao Y, McClements DJ. 2012. Fabrication of functional micro-clusters by heteroaggregation of oppositely charged protein-coated lipid droplets. Food Hydrocoll. 27:180–90
     [Google Scholar]
  85. Mao Y, McClements DJ. 2013. Modification of emulsion properties by heteroaggregation of oppositely charged starch-coated and protein-coated fat droplets. Food Hydrocoll 33:2320–26
     [Google Scholar]
  86. Markey O, Lovegrove JA, Methven L. 2015. Sensory profiles and consumer acceptability of a range of sugar-reduced products on the UK market. Food Res. Int. 72:133–39
     [Google Scholar]
  87. Matsuyama S, Nakauma M, Funami T, Hori K, Ono T. 2021. Human physiological responses during swallowing of gel-type foods and its correlation with textural perception. Food Hydrocoll. 111:106353
     [Google Scholar]
  88. Mattes RD. 2009. Oral thresholds and suprathreshold intensity ratings for free fatty acids on 3 tongue sites in humans: implications for transduction mechanisms. Chem. Senses 34:5415–23
     [Google Scholar]
  89. Matz SA. 1962. Food Texture Westport, CT: Avi Publ.
  90. McCrickerd K, Forde C. 2017. Consistency of eating rate, oral processing behaviours and energy intake across meals. Nutrients 9:8891
     [Google Scholar]
  91. McCrickerd K, Lim CM, Leong C, Chia EM, Forde CG 2017. Texture-based differences in eating rate reduce the impact of increased energy density and large portions on meal size in adults. J. Nutr. 147:61208–17
     [Google Scholar]
  92. Michiwaki Y, Kamiya T, Kikuchi T, Toyama Y, Hanyuu K et al. 2019. Modelling of swallowing organs and its validation using Swallow Vision®, a numerical swallowing simulator. Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Eng. Imaging Vis. 7:4374–81
     [Google Scholar]
  93. Michiwaki Y, Kikuchi T, Kamiya T, Toyama Y, Inoue M et al. 2020a. Computational modeling of child's swallowing to simulate choking on toys. Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Eng. Imaging Vis. 8:3266–72
     [Google Scholar]
  94. Michiwaki Y, Kamiya T, Kikuchi T, Toyama Y, Takai M et al. 2020b. Realistic computer simulation of bolus flow during swallowing. Food Hydrocoll. 108:106040
     [Google Scholar]
  95. Mo L, Chen J, Wang X. 2019. A novel experimental set up for in situ oral lubrication measurements. Food Hydrocoll 95:396–405
     [Google Scholar]
  96. Morell P, Chen J, Fiszman S 2017. The role of starch and saliva in tribology studies and the sensory perception of protein-added yogurts. Food Funct 8:2545–53
     [Google Scholar]
  97. Mosca AC, Bult JHF, Stieger M. 2013. Effect of spatial distribution of tastants on taste intensity, fluctuation of taste intensity and consumer preference of (semi-)solid food products. Food Qual. Preferences 28:1182–87
     [Google Scholar]
  98. Mosca AC, Chen J. 2017. Food-saliva interactions: mechanisms and implications. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 66:125–34
     [Google Scholar]
  99. Mosca AC, Feron G, Chen J. 2019a. Saliva and food oral processing. J. Texture Stud. 50:14–5
     [Google Scholar]
  100. Mosca AC, Torres AP, Slob E, de Graaf K, McEwan JA, Stieger M. 2019b. Small food texture modifications can be used to change oral processing behaviour and to control ad libitum food intake. Appetite 142:104375
     [Google Scholar]
  101. Mosca AC, van de Velde F, Bult JHF, van Boekel MAJS, Stieger M. 2010. Enhancement of sweetness intensity in gels by inhomogeneous distribution of sucrose. Food Qual. Preferences 21:7837–42
     [Google Scholar]
  102. Mosca AC, van de Velde F, Bult JHF, van Boekel MAJS, Stieger M. 2012. Effect of gel texture and sucrose spatial distribution on sweetness perception. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 46:1183–88
     [Google Scholar]
  103. Mosca AC, van de Velde F, Bult JHF, van Boekel MAJS, Stieger M. 2015. Taste enhancement in food gels: effect of fracture properties on oral breakdown, bolus formation and sweetness intensity. Food Hydrocoll 43:794–802
     [Google Scholar]
  104. Muñoz-González C, Feron G, Brulé M, Canon F. 2018. Understanding the release and metabolism of aroma compounds using micro-volume saliva samples by ex vivo approaches. Food Chem. 240:275–85
     [Google Scholar]
  105. Muñoz-González C, Feron G, Guichard E, Rodríguez-Bencomo JJ, Martín-Álvarez PJ et al. 2014. Understanding the role of saliva in aroma release from wine by using static and dynamic headspace conditions. J. Agric. Food Chem. 62:338274–88
     [Google Scholar]
  106. Nishinari K, Fang Y, Rosenthal A. 2019a. Human oral processing and texture profile analysis parameters: bridging the gap between the sensory evaluation and the instrumental measurements. J. Texture Stud. 50:5369–80
     [Google Scholar]
  107. Nishinari K, Turcanu M, Nakauma M, Fang Y 2019b. Role of fluid cohesiveness in safe swallowing. npj Sci. Food 3:5
     [Google Scholar]
  108. Noort MWJ, Bult JHF, Stieger M, Hamer RJ. 2010. Saltiness enhancement in bread by inhomogeneous spatial distribution of sodium chloride. J. Cereal Sci. 52:3378–86
     [Google Scholar]
  109. Okawa J, Hori K, Yoshimoto T, Salazar SE, Ono T. 2021. Higher masticatory performance and higher number of chewing strokes increase retronasal aroma. Front. Nutr. 8:623507
     [Google Scholar]
  110. Onuma T, Maruyama H, Sakai N. 2018. Enhancement of saltiness perception by monosodium glutamate taste and soy sauce odor: a near-infrared spectroscopy study. Chem. Senses 43:3151–67
     [Google Scholar]
  111. Oppermann AKL, Piqueras-Fiszman B, de Graaf C, Scholten E, Stieger M 2016. Descriptive sensory profiling of double emulsions with gelled and non-gelled inner water phase. Food Res. Int. 85:215–23
     [Google Scholar]
  112. Oppermann AKL, Renssen M, Schuch A, Stieger M, Scholten E. 2015. Effect of gelation of inner dispersed phase on stability of (w1/o/w2) multiple emulsions. Food Hydrocoll. 48:17–26
     [Google Scholar]
  113. Oppermann AKL, Verkaaik LC, Stieger M, Scholten E. 2017. Influence of double (w1/o/w2) emulsion composition on lubrication properties. Food Funct 8:2522–32
     [Google Scholar]
  114. Özay H, Çakır A, Ecevit MC 2019. Retronasal olfaction test methods: a systematic review. Balk. Med. J. 36:49–59
     [Google Scholar]
  115. Pagès-Hélary S, Andriot I, Guichard E, Canon F 2014. Retention effect of human saliva on aroma release and respective contribution of salivary mucin and α-amylase. Food Res. Int. 64:424–31
     [Google Scholar]
  116. Panda S, Chen J, Benjamin O 2020. Development of model mouth for food oral processing studies: present challenges and scopes. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. 66:102524
     [Google Scholar]
  117. Papapanagiotou V, Diou C, Zhou L, van den Boer J, Mars M, Delopoulos A 2017. A novel chewing detection system based on PPG, audio, and accelerometry. IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inf. 21:3607–18
     [Google Scholar]
  118. Peleg M. 2019. The instrumental texture profile analysis revisited. J. Texture Stud. 50:5362–68
     [Google Scholar]
  119. Peyron M-A, Gierczynski I, Hartmann C, Loret C, Dardevet D et al. 2011. Role of physical bolus properties as sensory inputs in the trigger of swallowing. PLOS ONE 6:6e21167
     [Google Scholar]
  120. Peyron M-A, Santé-Lhoutellier V, Dardevet D, Hennequin M, Rémond D et al. 2019. Addressing various challenges related to food bolus and nutrition with the AM2 mastication simulator. Food Hydrocoll 97:105229
     [Google Scholar]
  121. Planes-Muñoz D, Frontela-Saseta C, Ros-Berruezo G, López-Nicolás R. 2021. Effect of gazpacho, hummus and ajoblanco on satiety and appetite in adult humans: a randomised crossover study. Foods 10:3606
     [Google Scholar]
  122. Ployon S, Morzel M, Canon F. 2017. The role of saliva in aroma release and perception. Food Chem. 226:212–20
     [Google Scholar]
  123. Repoux M, Sémon E, Feron G, Guichard E, Labouré H 2012. Inter-individual variability in aroma release during sweet mint consumption. Flavour Fragr. J. 27:140–46
     [Google Scholar]
  124. Roach M. 2014. Gulp London: Oneworld Publ.
  125. Rolls ET, Verhagen JV, Kadohisa M. 2003. Representations of the texture of food in the primate orbitofrontal cortex: neurons responding to viscosity, grittiness, and capsaicin. J. Neurophysiol. 90:63711–24
     [Google Scholar]
  126. Ruijschop RMAJ, Burgering MJM, Jacobs MA, Boelrijk AEM. 2009. Retro-nasal aroma release depends on both subject and product differences: a link to food intake regulation?. Chem. Senses 34:5395–403
     [Google Scholar]
  127. Sanahuja S, Upadhyay R, Briesen H, Chen J. 2017. Spectral analysis of the stick-slip phenomenon in “oral” tribological texture evaluation. J. Texture Stud. 48:4318–34
     [Google Scholar]
  128. Sarkar A, Krop EM. 2019. Marrying oral tribology to sensory perception: a systematic review. Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 27:64–73
     [Google Scholar]
  129. Sarkar A, Soltanahmadi S, Chen J, Stokes JR. 2021. Oral tribology: providing insight into oral processing of food colloids. Food Hydrocoll 117:106635
     [Google Scholar]
  130. Sharma M, Duizer L. 2019. Characterizing the dynamic textural properties of hydrocolloids in pureed foods—a comparison between TDS and TCATA. Foods 8:6184
     [Google Scholar]
  131. Shupe GE, Resmondo ZN, Luckett CR. 2018. Characterization of oral tactile sensitivity and masticatory performance across adulthood. J. Texture Stud. 49:6560–68
     [Google Scholar]
  132. Shupe GE, Wilson A, Luckett CR 2019. The effect of oral tactile sensitivity on texture perception and mastication behavior. J. Texture Stud. 50:4285–94
     [Google Scholar]
  133. Steele CM. 2015. The blind scientists and the elephant of swallowing: a review of instrumental perspectives on swallowing physiology. J. Texture Stud. 46:3122–37
     [Google Scholar]
  134. Steele CM, Alsanei WA, Ayanikalath S, Barbon CEA, Chen J, Cichero JAY et al. 2015. The influence of food texture and liquid consistency modification on swallowing physiology and function: a systematic review. Dysphagia 30:2–26
     [Google Scholar]
  135. Stokes JR, Boehm MW, Baier SK. 2013. Oral processing, texture and mouthfeel: from rheology to tribology and beyond. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 18:4349–59
     [Google Scholar]
  136. Stribițcaia E, Gibbons C, Sier J, Boesch C, Blundell J et al. 2021. Effects of oral lubrication on satiety, satiation and salivary biomarkers in model foods: a pilot study. Appetite 165:105427
     [Google Scholar]
  137. Taladrid D, Lorente L, Bartolome B, Moreno-Arribas V, Laguna L. 2019. An integrative salivary approach regarding palate cleansers in wine tasting. J. Texture Stud. 50:175–82
     [Google Scholar]
  138. Tang JY, Larsen DS, Ferguson L, James BJ 2017. Textural complexity model foods assessed with instrumental and sensory measurements. J. Texture Stud. 48:19–22
     [Google Scholar]
  139. Tarrega A, Marcano J, Fiszman S. 2016. Yogurt viscosity and fruit pieces affect satiating capacity expectations. Food Res. Int. 89:574–81
     [Google Scholar]
  140. Tarrega A, Yven C, Sémon E, Mielle P, Salles C. 2019. Effect of oral physiology parameters on in-mouth aroma compound release using lipoprotein matrices: an in vitro approach. Foods 8:3106
     [Google Scholar]
  141. Tarrega A, Yven C, Sémon E, Salles C. 2008. Aroma release and chewing activity during eating different model cheeses. Int. Dairy J. 18:8849–57
     [Google Scholar]
  142. Tarrega A, Yven C, Sémon E, Salles C 2011. In-mouth aroma compound release during cheese consumption: relationship with food bolus formation. Int. Dairy J. 21:5358–64
     [Google Scholar]
  143. Upadhyay R, Aktar T, Chen J 2020. Perception of creaminess in foods. J. Texture Stud. 51:3375–88
     [Google Scholar]
  144. Upadhyay R, Chen J. 2019. Smoothness as a tactile percept: correlating ‘oral’ tribology with sensory measurements. Food Hydrocoll 87:38–47
     [Google Scholar]
  145. van den Boer J, van der Lee A, Zhou L, Papapanagiotou V, Diou C et al. 2018. The SPLENDID eating detection sensor: development and feasibility study. JMIR mHealth uHealth 6:9e170
     [Google Scholar]
  146. van der Glas H, Liu T, Zhang Y, Wang X, Chen J 2020. Optimizing a determination of chewing efficiency using a solid test food. J. Texture Stud. 51:169–84
     [Google Scholar]
  147. van Eck A, Hardeman N, Karatza N, Fogliano V, Scholten E, Stieger M 2019. Oral processing behavior and dynamic sensory perception of composite foods: toppings assist saliva in bolus formation. Food Qual. Preferences 71:497–509
     [Google Scholar]
  148. van Vliet T. 2013. Rheology and Fracture Mechanics of Foods Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press
  149. Veldhuizen MG, Siddique A, Rosenthal S, Marks LE. 2017. Interactions of lemon, sucrose and citric acid in enhancing citrus, sweet and sour flavors. Chem. Senses 43:117–26
     [Google Scholar]
  150. Vinyard CJ, Fiszman S. 2016. Using electromyography as a research tool in food science. Curr. Opin. Food Sci. 9:50–55
     [Google Scholar]
  151. Wada S, Goto T, Fujimoto K, Watanabe M, Nagao K et al. 2017. Changes in food bolus texture during mastication. J. Texture Stud. 48:2171–77
     [Google Scholar]
  152. Wagoner TB, Çakır-Fuller E, Drake M, Foegeding EA. 2019. Sweetness perception in protein-polysaccharide beverages is not explained by viscosity or critical overlap concentration. Food Hydrocoll. 94:229–37
     [Google Scholar]
  153. Wang Q, Wang X, Chen J. 2020. A new design of soft texture analyzer tribometer (STAT) for in vitro oral lubrication study. Food Hydrocoll. 110:106146
     [Google Scholar]
  154. Wang Q, Zhu Y, Chen J. 2021. Development of a simulated tongue substrate for in vitro soft “oral” tribology study. Food Hydrocoll. 120:106991
     [Google Scholar]
  155. Wang X, Chen J, Wang X 2022. In situ oral lubrication and smoothness sensory perception influenced by tongue surface roughness. J. Sci. Food Agric. 102:1132–38
     [Google Scholar]
  156. Wang X, Wang X, Upadhyay R, Chen J. 2019. Topographic study of human tongue in relation to oral tribology. Food Hydrocoll. 95:116–21
     [Google Scholar]
  157. Wang Y, Cui H, Zhang Q, Hayat K, Yu J et al. 2021. Proline-glucose Amadori compounds: aqueous preparation, characterization and saltiness enhancement. Food Res. Int. 144:110319
     [Google Scholar]
  158. Yang N, Galves C, Racioni Goncalves AC, Chen J, Fisk I 2020. Impact of capsaicin on aroma release: in vitro and in vivo analysis. Food Res. Int. 133:109197
     [Google Scholar]
  159. Yang N, Yang Q, Chen J, Fisk I 2021. Impact of capsaicin on aroma release and perception from flavoured solutions. LWT Food Sci. Technol. 138:110613
     [Google Scholar]
  160. Zhang D, Ma W, Wu J, Zhao L, Sirguleng et al. 2020. Oral physiological and biochemical characteristics of different dietary habit groups II: Comparison of oral salivary biochemical properties of Chinese Mongolian and Han Young adults. Food Res. Int. 136:109465
     [Google Scholar]
  161. Zhang Y, Liu T, Wang X, Chen J, van der Glas HW. 2019. Locking up of food between posterior teeth and its influence on chewing efficiency. Arch. Oral Biol. 107:104524
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-food-052720-103054
Loading
Current Perspectives on Food Oral Processing
Annual Review of Food Science and Technology 13, 167 (2022); https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-food-052720-103054
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-food-052720-103054
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-food-052720-103054
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error