Orientation of Cell Polarity by Chemical Gradients

Literature Cited

1. 1.

   Abdul-Ganiyu R, Venegas LA, Wang X, Puerner C, Arkowitz RA et al. 2021. Phosphorylated Gβ is a directional cue during yeast gradient tracking. Sci. Signal. 14:682eabf4710
   [Google Scholar]
2. 2.

   Abu Shah E, Keren K 2014. Symmetry breaking in reconstituted actin cortices. eLife 3:e01433
   [Google Scholar]
3. 3.

   Alvaro CG, Thorner J. 2016. Heterotrimeric G protein-coupled receptor signaling in yeast mating pheromone response. J. Biol. Chem. 291:157788–95
   [Google Scholar]
4. 4.

   Andrew N, Insall RH 2007. Chemotaxis in shallow gradients is mediated independently of PtdIns 3-kinase by biased choices between random protrusions. Nat. Cell Biol. 9:2193–200
   [Google Scholar]
5. 5.

   Artemenko Y, Lampert TJ, Devreotes PN. 2014. Moving towards a paradigm: common mechanisms of chemotactic signaling in Dictyostelium and mammalian leukocytes. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 71:193711–47
   [Google Scholar]
6. 6.

   Bajaj A, Celić A, Ding F-X, Naider F, Becker JM, Dumont ME. 2004. A fluorescent alpha-factor analogue exhibits multiple steps on binding to its G protein coupled receptor in yeast. Biochemistry 43:4213564–78
   [Google Scholar]
7. 7.

   Ballon DR, Flanary PL, Gladue DP, Konopka JB, Dohlman HG, Thorner J. 2006. DEP-domain-mediated regulation of GPCR signaling responses. Cell 126:61079–93
   [Google Scholar]
8. 8.

   Bendezú FO, Martin SG. 2013. Cdc42 explores the cell periphery for mate selection in fission yeast. Curr. Biol. 23:142–47
   [Google Scholar]
9. 9.

   Bendezú FO, Vincenzetti V, Vavylonis D, Wyss R, Vogel H, Martin SG. 2015. Spontaneous Cdc42 polarization independent of GDI-mediated extraction and actin-based trafficking. PLOS Biol 13:4e1002097
   [Google Scholar]
10. 10.

    Berg HC, Purcell EM. 1977. Physics of chemoreception. Biophys. J. 20:2193–219
    [Google Scholar]
11. 11.

    Bialek W, Setayeshgar S. 2005. Physical limits to biochemical signaling. PNAS 102:2910040–45
    [Google Scholar]
12. 12.

    Bose I, Irazoqui JE, Moskow JJ, Bardes ES, Zyla TR, Lew DJ. 2001. Assembly of scaffold-mediated complexes containing Cdc42p, the exchange factor Cdc24p, and the effector Cla4p required for cell cycle-regulated phosphorylation of Cdc24p. J. Biol. Chem. 276:107176–86
    [Google Scholar]
13. 13.

    Bosgraaf L, Van Haastert PJM. 2009. The ordered extension of pseudopodia by amoeboid cells in the absence of external cues. PLOS ONE 4:4e5253
    [Google Scholar]
14. 14.

    Buller A. 1958. Researches on Fungi. London: Longmans Green & Co:.
    [Google Scholar]
15. 15.

    Bush A, Vasen G, Constantinou A, Dunayevich P, Patop IL et al. 2016. Yeast GPCR signaling reflects the fraction of occupied receptors, not the number. Mol. Syst. Biol. 12:12898
    [Google Scholar]
16. 16.

    Butty A-C, Perrinjaquet N, Petit A, Jaquenoud M, Segall JE et al. 2002. A positive feedback loop stabilizes the guanine-nucleotide exchange factor Cdc24 at sites of polarization. EMBO J 21:71565–76
    [Google Scholar]
17. 17.

    Butty AC, Pryciak PM, Huang LS, Herskowitz I, Peter M 1998. The role of Far1p in linking the heterotrimeric G protein to polarity establishment proteins during yeast mating. Science 282:53931511–16
    [Google Scholar]
18. 18.

    Chiou J-G, Balasubramanian MK, Lew DJ. 2017. Cell polarity in yeast. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 33:77–101
    [Google Scholar]
19. 19.

    Chiou J-G, Moran KD, Lew DJ. 2021. How cells determine the number of polarity sites. eLife 10:e58768
    [Google Scholar]
20. 20.

    Chiou J-G, Ramirez SA, Elston TC, Witelski TP, Schaeffer DG, Lew DJ. 2018. Principles that govern competition or co-existence in Rho-GTPase driven polarization. PLOS Comput. Biol. 14:4e1006095
    [Google Scholar]
21. 21.

    Clark-Cotton MR, Henderson NT, Pablo M, Ghose D, Elston TC, Lew DJ. 2021. Exploratory polarization facilitates mating partner selection in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Biol. Cell 32:101048–63
    [Google Scholar]
22. 22.

    Conlon P, Gelin-Licht R, Ganesan A, Zhang J, Levchenko A. 2016. Single-cell dynamics and variability of MAPK activity in a yeast differentiation pathway. PNAS 113:40E5896–905
    [Google Scholar]
23. 23.

    Das M, Drake T, Wiley DJ, Buchwald P, Vavylonis D, Verde F. 2012. Oscillatory dynamics of Cdc42 GTPase in the control of polarized growth. Science 337:6091239–43
    [Google Scholar]
24. 24.

    Deflorio R, Brett M-E, Waszczak N, Apollinari E, Metodiev MV et al. 2013. Phosphorylation of Gβ is crucial for efficient chemotropism in yeast. J. Cell Sci. 126:Pt. 142997–3009
    [Google Scholar]
25. 25.

    Devreotes PN, Bhattacharya S, Edwards M, Iglesias PA, Lampert T, Miao Y 2017. Excitable signal transduction networks in directed cell migration. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 33:103–25
    [Google Scholar]
26. 26.

    Dotti CG, Sullivan CA, Banker GA. 1988. The establishment of polarity by hippocampal neurons in culture. J. Neurosci. 8:41454–68
    [Google Scholar]
27. 27.

    Dyer JM, Savage NS, Jin M, Zyla TR, Elston TC, Lew DJ 2013. Tracking shallow chemical gradients by actin-driven wandering of the polarization site. Curr. Biol. 23:132–41
    [Google Scholar]
28. 28.

    Endo M, Shirouzu M, Yokoyama S. 2003. The Cdc42 binding and scaffolding activities of the fission yeast adaptor protein Scd2. J. Biol. Chem. 278:2843–52
    [Google Scholar]
29. 29.

    Endres RG, Wingreen NS. 2008. Accuracy of direct gradient sensing by single cells. PNAS 105:4115749–54
    [Google Scholar]
30. 30.

    Errede B, Hladyshau S, Nivedita N, Tsygankov D, Elston TC 2021. Bistability in the polarity circuit of yeast. Mol. Biol. Cell. In press
    [Google Scholar]
31. 31.

    Errede B, Vered L, Ford E, Pena MI, Elston TC 2015. Pheromone-induced morphogenesis and gradient tracking are dependent on the MAPK Fus3 binding to Gα. Mol. Biol. Cell 26:183343–58
    [Google Scholar]
32. 32.

    Etienne-Manneville S. 2004. Cdc42—the centre of polarity. J. Cell Sci. 117:Pt. 81291–300
    [Google Scholar]
33. 33.

    Fu Y, Gu Y, Zheng Z, Wasteneys G, Yang Z 2005. Arabidopsis interdigitating cell growth requires two antagonistic pathways with opposing action on cell morphogenesis. Cell 120:5687–700
    [Google Scholar]
34. 34.

    Gamba A, de Candia A, Di Talia S, Coniglio A, Bussolino F, Serini G. 2005. Diffusion-limited phase separation in eukaryotic chemotaxis. PNAS 102:4716927–32
    [Google Scholar]
35. 35.

    Ghose D, Jacobs K, Ramirez S, Elston T, Lew D. 2021. Chemotactic movement of a polarity site enables yeast cells to find their mates. PNAS 118:22e2025445118
    [Google Scholar]
36. 36.

    Ghose D, Lew D. 2020. Mechanistic insights into actin-driven polarity site movement in yeast. Mol. Biol. Cell 31:101085–102
    [Google Scholar]
37. 37.

    Gierer A, Meinhardt H. 1972. A theory of biological pattern formation. Kybernetik 12:130–39
    [Google Scholar]
38. 38.

    Gladfelter AS, Moskow JJ, Zyla TR, Lew DJ. 2001. Isolation and characterization of effector-loop mutants of CDC42 in yeast. Mol. Biol. Cell 12:51239–55
    [Google Scholar]
39. 39.

    Goryachev AB, Leda M. 2017. Many roads to symmetry breaking: molecular mechanisms and theoretical models of yeast cell polarity. Mol. Biol. Cell 28:3370–80
    [Google Scholar]
40. 40.

    Gov NS. 2018. Guided by curvature: shaping cells by coupling curved membrane proteins and cytoskeletal forces. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 373:174720170115
    [Google Scholar]
41. 41.

    Graziano BR, Town JP, Sitarska E, Nagy TL, Fošnarič M et al. 2019. Cell confinement reveals a branched-actin independent circuit for neutrophil polarity. PLOS Biol 17:10e3000457
    [Google Scholar]
42. 42.

    Halatek J, Brauns F, Frey E. 2018. Self-organization principles of intracellular pattern formation. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 373:174720170107
    [Google Scholar]
43. 43.

    Halatek J, Frey E. 2018. Rethinking pattern formation in reaction-diffusion systems. Nat. Phys. 14:507–14
    [Google Scholar]
44. 44.

    Hegemann B, Unger M, Lee SS, Stoffel-Studer I, van den Heuvel J et al. 2015. A cellular system for spatial signal decoding in chemical gradients. Dev. Cell 35:4458–70
    [Google Scholar]
45. 45.

    Henderson NT, Pablo M, Ghose D, Clark-Cotton MR, Zyla TR et al. 2019. Ratiometric GPCR signaling enables directional sensing in yeast. PLOS Biol 17:10e3000484
    [Google Scholar]
46. 46.

    Houk AR, Jilkine A, Mejean CO, Boltyanskiy R, Dufresne ER et al. 2012. Membrane tension maintains cell polarity by confining signals to the leading edge during neutrophil migration. Cell 148:1–2175–88
    [Google Scholar]
47. 47.

    Howell AS, Jin M, Wu C-F, Zyla TR, Elston TC, Lew DJ. 2012. Negative feedback enhances robustness in the yeast polarity establishment circuit. Cell 149:2322–33
    [Google Scholar]
48. 48.

    Hu B, Chen W, Rappel W-J, Levine H. 2010. Physical limits on cellular sensing of spatial gradients. Phys. Rev. Lett. 105:4048104
    [Google Scholar]
49. 49.

    Iijima M, Huang YE, Devreotes P. 2002. Temporal and spatial regulation of chemotaxis. Dev. Cell 3:4469–78
    [Google Scholar]
50. 50.

    Irazoqui JE, Gladfelter AS, Lew DJ. 2003. Scaffold-mediated symmetry breaking by Cdc42p. Nat. Cell Biol. 5:121062–70
    [Google Scholar]
51. 51.

    Ismael A, Tian W, Waszczak N, Wang X, Cao Y et al. 2016. Gβ promotes pheromone receptor polarization and yeast chemotropism by inhibiting receptor phosphorylation. Sci. Signal. 9:423ra38
    [Google Scholar]
52. 52.

    Jacobs B, Molenaar J, Deinum EE. 2019. Small GTPase patterning: how to stabilise cluster coexistence. PLOS ONE 14:3e0213188
    [Google Scholar]
53. 53.

    Janetopoulos C, Ma L, Devreotes PN, Iglesias PA. 2004. Chemoattractant-induced phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-trisphosphate accumulation is spatially amplified and adapts, independent of the actin cytoskeleton. PNAS 101:248951–56
    [Google Scholar]
54. 54.

    Jenness DD, Burkholder AC, Hartwell LH. 1983. Binding of alpha-factor pheromone to yeast a cells: chemical and genetic evidence for an alpha-factor receptor. Cell 35:2 Pt. 1521–29
    [Google Scholar]
55. 55.

    Jilkine A, Angenent SB, Wu LF, Altschuler SJ. 2011. A density-dependent switch drives stochastic clustering and polarization of signaling molecules. PLOS Comput. Biol. 7:11e1002271
    [Google Scholar]
56. 56.

    Jilkine A, Edelstein-Keshet L. 2011. A comparison of mathematical models for polarization of single eukaryotic cells in response to guided cues. PLOS Comput. Biol. 7:4e1001121
    [Google Scholar]
57. 57.

    Kelley JB, Dixit G, Sheetz JB, Venkatapurapu SP, Elston TC, Dohlman HG. 2015. RGS proteins and septins cooperate to promote chemotropism by regulating polar cap mobility. Curr. Biol. 25:3275–85
    [Google Scholar]
58. 58.

    King JS, Insall RH. 2009. Chemotaxis: finding the way forward with Dictyostelium. Trends Cell Biol 19:10523–30
    [Google Scholar]
59. 59.

    Klünder B, Freisinger T, Wedlich-Söldner R, Frey E. 2013. GDI-mediated cell polarization in yeast provides precise spatial and temporal control of Cdc42 signaling. PLOS Comput. Biol. 9:12e1003396
    [Google Scholar]
60. 60.

    Kozubowski L, Saito K, Johnson JM, Howell AS, Zyla TR, Lew DJ. 2008. Symmetry-breaking polarization driven by a Cdc42p GEF-PAK complex. Curr. Biol. 18:221719–26
    [Google Scholar]
61. 61.

    Krause M, Gautreau A. 2014. Steering cell migration: lamellipodium dynamics and the regulation of directional persistence. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 15:9577–90
    [Google Scholar]
62. 62.

    Kuo C-C, Savage NS, Chen H, Wu C-F, Zyla TR, Lew DJ. 2014. Inhibitory GEF phosphorylation provides negative feedback in the yeast polarity circuit. Curr. Biol. 24:7753–59
    [Google Scholar]
63. 63.

    Lakhani V, Elston TC. 2017. Testing the limits of gradient sensing. PLOS Comput. Biol. 13:2e1005386
    [Google Scholar]
64. 64.

    Lamas I, Merlini L, Vještica A, Vincenzetti V, Martin SG. 2020. Optogenetics reveals Cdc42 local activation by scaffold-mediated positive feedback and Ras GTPase. PLOS Biol 18:1e3000600
    [Google Scholar]
65. 65.

    Levine H, Rappel W-J. 2013. The physics of eukaryotic chemotaxis. Phys. Today 66:2):10.1063–PT.3.1884
    [Google Scholar]
66. 66.

    Machacek M, Hodgson L, Welch C, Elliott H, Pertz O et al. 2009. Coordination of Rho GTPase activities during cell protrusion. Nature 461:726099–103
    [Google Scholar]
67. 67.

    Martin SG. 2019. Molecular mechanisms of chemotropism and cell fusion in unicellular fungi. J. Cell Sci. 132:11jcs230706
    [Google Scholar]
68. 68.

    Matheos D, Metodiev M, Muller E, Stone D, Rose MD. 2004. Pheromone-induced polarization is dependent on the Fus3p MAPK acting through the formin Bni1p. J. Cell Biol. 165:199–109
    [Google Scholar]
69. 69.

    McClure AW, Minakova M, Dyer JM, Zyla TR, Elston TC, Lew DJ. 2015. Role of polarized G protein signaling in tracking pheromone gradients. Dev. Cell 35:4471–82
    [Google Scholar]
70. 70.

    McCudden CR, Hains MD, Kimple RJ, Siderovski DP, Willard FS. 2005. G-protein signaling: back to the future. Cell Mol. Life Sci. 62:5551–77
    [Google Scholar]
71. 71.

    Meinhardt H. 1999. Orientation of chemotactic cells and growth cones: models and mechanisms. J. Cell Sci. 112:Pt. 172867–74
    [Google Scholar]
72. 72.

    Meinhardt H, Gierer A. 1974. Applications of a theory of biological pattern formation based on lateral inhibition. J. Cell Sci. 15:2321–46
    [Google Scholar]
73. 73.

    Merlini L, Khalili B, Bendezú FO, Hurwitz D, Vincenzetti V et al. 2016. Local pheromone release from dynamic polarity sites underlies cell-cell pairing during yeast mating. Curr. Biol. 26:81117–25
    [Google Scholar]
74. 74.

    Metodiev MV, Matheos D, Rose MD, Stone DE 2002. Regulation of MAPK function by direct interaction with the mating-specific Gα in yeast. Science 296:55721483–86
    [Google Scholar]
75. 75.

    Miyanaga Y, Matsuoka S, Yanagida T, Ueda M. 2007. Stochastic signal inputs for chemotactic response in Dictyostelium cells revealed by single molecule imaging techniques. Biosystems 88:3251–60
    [Google Scholar]
76. 76.

    Mogilner A, Zhu J. 2012. Cell polarity: Tension quenches the rear. Curr. Biol. 22:2R48–51
    [Google Scholar]
77. 77.

    Mori Y, Jilkine A, Edelstein-Keshet L. 2008. Wave-pinning and cell polarity from a bistable reaction-diffusion system. Biophys. J. 94:93684–97
    [Google Scholar]
78. 78.

    Mullins RD. 2010. Cytoskeletal mechanisms for breaking cellular symmetry. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2:1a003392
    [Google Scholar]
79. 79.

    Munro E, Nance J, Priess JR 2004. Cortical flows powered by asymmetrical contraction transport PAR proteins to establish and maintain anterior-posterior polarity in the early C. elegans embryo. Dev. Cell 7:3413–24
    [Google Scholar]
80. 80.

    Nern A, Arkowitz RA. 1998. A GTP-exchange factor required for cell orientation. Nature 391:6663195–98
    [Google Scholar]
81. 81.

    Nern A, Arkowitz RA. 1999. A Cdc24p-Far1p-Gβγ protein complex required for yeast orientation during mating. J. Cell Biol. 144:61187–202
    [Google Scholar]
82. 82.

    Nern A, Arkowitz RA. 2000. G proteins mediate changes in cell shape by stabilizing the axis of polarity. Mol. Cell 5:5853–64
    [Google Scholar]
83. 83.

    Nguyen TTT, Park WS, Park BO, Kim CY, Oh Y et al. 2016. PLEKHG3 enhances polarized cell migration by activating actin filaments at the cell front. PNAS 113:3610091–96
    [Google Scholar]
84. 84.

    Okada S, Leda M, Hanna J, Savage NS, Bi E, Goryachev AB 2013. Daughter cell identity emerges from the interplay of Cdc42, septins, and exocytosis. Dev. Cell 26:2148–61
    [Google Scholar]
85. 85.

    Otsuji M, Ishihara S, Co C, Kaibuchi K, Mochizuki A, Kuroda S 2007. A mass conserved reaction-diffusion system captures properties of cell polarity. PLOS Comput. Biol. 3:6e108
    [Google Scholar]
86. 86.

    Ozbudak EM, Becskei A, van Oudenaarden A. 2005. A system of counteracting feedback loops regulates Cdc42p activity during spontaneous cell polarization. Dev. Cell 9:4565–71
    [Google Scholar]
87. 87.

    Pablo M, Ramirez SA, Elston TC. 2018. Particle-based simulations of polarity establishment reveal stochastic promotion of Turing pattern formation. PLOS Comput. Biol. 14:3e1006016
    [Google Scholar]
88. 88.

    Paluch E, van der Gucht J, Sykes C. 2006. Cracking up: symmetry breaking in cellular systems. J. Cell Biol. 175:5687–92
    [Google Scholar]
89. 89.

    Parent CA, Blacklock BJ, Froehlich WM, Murphy DB, Devreotes PN 1998. G protein signaling events are activated at the leading edge of chemotactic cells. Cell 95:181–91
    [Google Scholar]
90. 90.

    Park H-O, Bi E. 2007. Central roles of small GTPases in the development of cell polarity in yeast and beyond. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 71:148–96
    [Google Scholar]
91. 91.

    Phillips R, Milo R. 2009. A feeling for the numbers in biology. PNAS 106:5121465–71
    [Google Scholar]
92. 92.

    Pryciak PM, Huntress FA. 1998. Membrane recruitment of the kinase cascade scaffold protein Ste5 by the Gβγ complex underlies activation of the yeast pheromone response pathway. Genes Dev 12:172684–97
    [Google Scholar]
93. 93.

    Qin Y, Yang Z 2011. Rapid tip growth: insights from pollen tubes. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 22:8816–24
    [Google Scholar]
94. 94.

    Ramirez SA, Pablo M, Burk S, Lew DJ, Elston TC 2021. A novel stochastic simulation approach enables exploration of mechanisms for regulating polarity site movement. PLOS Comput. Biol. 17:7e1008525
    [Google Scholar]
95. 95.

    Rappel W-J, Levine H. 2008. Receptor noise and directional sensing in eukaryotic chemotaxis. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100:22228101
    [Google Scholar]
96. 96.

    Rappel W-J, Loomis WF. 2009. Eukaryotic chemotaxis. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Syst. Biol. Med. 1:1141–49
    [Google Scholar]
97. 97.

    Raths SK, Naider F, Becker JM. 1988. Peptide analogues compete with the binding of alpha-factor to its receptor in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biol. Chem. 263:3317333–41
    [Google Scholar]
98. 98.

    Raz E, Reichman-Fried M. 2006. Attraction rules: germ cell migration in zebrafish. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 16:4355–59
    [Google Scholar]
99. 99.

    Roca MG, Arlt J, Jeffree CE, Read ND. 2005. Cell biology of conidial anastomosis tubes in Neurospora crassa. Eukaryot. Cell 4:5911–19
    [Google Scholar]
100. 100.

     Roussos ET, Condeelis JS, Patsialou A. 2011. Chemotaxis in cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 11:8573–87
     [Google Scholar]
101. 101.

     Schnorrer F, Dickson BJ. 2004. Axon guidance: Morphogens show the way. Curr. Biol. 14:1R19–21
     [Google Scholar]
102. 102.

     Servant G, Weiner OD, Herzmark P, Balla T, Sedat JW, Bourne HR. 2000. Polarization of chemoattractant receptor signaling during neutrophil chemotaxis. Science 287:54551037–40
     [Google Scholar]
103. 103.

     Shi Z, Graber ZT, Baumgart T, Stone HA, Cohen AE. 2018. Cell membranes resist flow. Cell 175:71769–79.e13
     [Google Scholar]
104. 104.

     Skoge M, Yue H, Erickstad M, Bae A, Levine H et al. 2014. Cellular memory in eukaryotic chemotaxis. PNAS 111:4014448–53
     [Google Scholar]
105. 105.

     Snetselaar KM, Bolker M, Kahmann R. 1996. Ustilago maydis mating hyphae orient their growth toward pheromone sources. Fungal Genet. Biol. 20:4299–312
     [Google Scholar]
106. 106.

     Swaney KF, Huang C-H, Devreotes PN. 2010. Eukaryotic chemotaxis: A network of signaling pathways controls motility, directional sensing, and polarity. Annu. Rev. Biophys. 39:265–89
     [Google Scholar]
107. 107.

     Tessier-Lavigne M, Placzek M, Lumsden AG, Dodd J, Jessell TM. 1988. Chemotropic guidance of developing axons in the mammalian central nervous system. Nature 336:6201775–78
     [Google Scholar]
108. 108.

     Thomson TM, Benjamin KR, Bush A, Love T, Pincus D et al. 2011. Scaffold number in yeast signaling system sets tradeoff between system output and dynamic range. PNAS 108:5020265–70
     [Google Scholar]
109. 109.

     Turing AM. 1952. The chemical basis of morphogenesis. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 237:64137–72
     [Google Scholar]
110. 110.

     Valtz N, Peter M, Herskowitz I 1995. FAR1 is required for oriented polarization of yeast cells in response to mating pheromones. J. Cell Biol. 131:4863–73
     [Google Scholar]
111. 111.

     Venkatapurapu SP, Kelley JB, Dixit G, Pena M, Errede B et al. 2015. Modulation of receptor dynamics by the regulator of G protein signaling Sst2. Mol. Biol. Cell 26:224124–34
     [Google Scholar]
112. 112.

     von Philipsborn A, Bastmeyer M. 2007. Mechanisms of gradient detection: a comparison of axon pathfinding with eukaryotic cell migration. Int. Rev. Cytol. 263:1–62
     [Google Scholar]
113. 113.

     Wang X, Tian W, Banh BT, Statler B-M, Liang J, Stone DE. 2019. Mating yeast cells use an intrinsic polarity site to assemble a pheromone-gradient tracking machine. J. Cell Biol. 218:113730–52
     [Google Scholar]
114. 114.

     Wedlich-Soldner R, SC Wai, Schmidt T, Li R. 2004. Robust cell polarity is a dynamic state established by coupling transport and GTPase signaling. J. Cell Biol. 166:6889–900
     [Google Scholar]
115. 115.

     Witte K, Strickland D, Glotzer M. 2017. Cell cycle entry triggers a switch between two modes of Cdc42 activation during yeast polarization. eLife 6:e26722
     [Google Scholar]
116. 116.

     Wu C-F, Chiou J-G, Minakova M, Woods B, Tsygankov D et al. 2015. Role of competition between polarity sites in establishing a unique front. eLife 4:e11611
     [Google Scholar]
117. 117.

     Wu C-F, Lew DJ. 2013. Beyond symmetry-breaking: competition and negative feedback in GTPase regulation. Trends Cell Biol 23:10476–83
     [Google Scholar]
118. 118.

     Xiong Y, Kabacoff C, Franca-Koh J, Devreotes PN, Robinson DN, Iglesias PA 2010. Automated characterization of cell shape changes during amoeboid motility by skeletonization. BMC Syst. Biol. 4:33
     [Google Scholar]
119. 119.

     Xu J, Wang F, Van Keymeulen A, Herzmark P, Straight A et al. 2003. Divergent signals and cytoskeletal assemblies regulate self-organizing polarity in neutrophils. Cell 114:2201–14
     [Google Scholar]
120. 120.

     Yang HW, Collins SR, Meyer T. 2016. Locally excitable Cdc42 signals steer cells during chemotaxis. Nat. Cell Biol. 18:2191–201
     [Google Scholar]
121. 121.

     Yi T-M, Kitano H, Simon MI 2003. A quantitative characterization of the yeast heterotrimeric G protein cycle. PNAS 100:1910764–69
     [Google Scholar]
122. 122.

     Zigmond SH, Levitsky HI, Kreel BJ. 1981. Cell polarity: an examination of its behavioral expression and its consequences for polymorphonuclear leukocyte chemotaxis. J. Cell Biol. 89:3585–92
     [Google Scholar]