How Microtubules Build the Spindle Branch by Branch

Literature Cited

1. Alfaro-Aco R, Thawani A, Petry S. 2017. Structural analysis of the role of TPX2 in branching microtubule nucleation. J. Cell Biol. 216:983–97
   [Google Scholar]
2. Alfaro-Aco R, Thawani A, Petry S. 2020. Biochemical reconstitution of branching microtubule nucleation. eLife 9:e49797
   [Google Scholar]
3. Alvarado-Kristensson M. 2018. γ-tubulin as a signal-transducing molecule and meshwork with therapeutic potential. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 3:24
   [Google Scholar]
4. Boissan M, Schlattner U, Lacombe ML. 2018. The NDPK/NME superfamily: state of the art. Lab. Investig. 98:164–74
   [Google Scholar]
5. Borek WE, Groocock LM, Samejima I, Zou J, de Lima Alves F et al. 2015. Mto2 multisite phosphorylation inactivates non-spindle microtubule nucleation complexes during mitosis. Nat. Commun. 6:7929
   [Google Scholar]
6. Brilot AF, Lyon AS, Zelter A, Viswanath S, Maxwell A et al. 2021. CM1-driven assembly and activation of yeast gamma-tubulin small complex underlies microtubule nucleation. eLife 10:e65168
   [Google Scholar]
7. Brouhard GJ, Stear JH, Noetzel TL, Al-Bassam J, Kinoshita K et al. 2008. XMAP215 is a processive microtubule polymerase. Cell 132:79–88
   [Google Scholar]
8. Brugues J, Nuzzo V, Mazur E, Needleman DJ. 2012. Nucleation and transport organize microtubules in metaphase spindles. Cell 149:554–64
   [Google Scholar]
9. Brunet S, Sardon T, Zimmerman T, Wittmann T, Pepperkok R et al. 2004. Characterization of the TPX2 domains involved in microtubule nucleation and spindle assembly in Xenopus egg extracts. Mol. Biol. Cell 15:5318–28
   [Google Scholar]
10. Bucciarelli E, Pellacani C, Naim V, Palena A, Gatti M, Somma MP. 2009. Drosophila Dgt6 interacts with Ndc80, Msps/XMAP215, and γ-tubulin to promote kinetochore-driven MT formation. Curr. Biol. 19:1839–45
    [Google Scholar]
11. Byrnes AE, Slep KC. 2017. TOG-tubulin binding specificity promotes microtubule dynamics and mitotic spindle formation. J. Cell Biol. 216:1641–57
    [Google Scholar]
12. Carazo-Salas RE, Guarguaglini G, Gruss OJ, Segref A, Karsenti E, Mattaj IW. 1999. Generation of GTP-bound Ran by RCC1 is required for chromatin-induced mitotic spindle formation. Nature 400:178–81
    [Google Scholar]
13. Cavazza T, Vernos I. 2015. The RanGTP pathway: from nucleo-cytoplasmic transport to spindle assembly and beyond. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 3:82
    [Google Scholar]
14. Chan J, Sambade A, Calder G, Lloyd C. 2009. Arabidopsis cortical microtubules are initiated along, as well as branching from, existing microtubules. Plant Cell 21:2298–306
    [Google Scholar]
15. Chen JWC, Chen ZA, Rogala KB, Metz J, Deane CM et al. 2017. Cross-linking mass spectrometry identifies new interfaces of Augmin required to localise the γ-tubulin ring complex to the mitotic spindle. Biol. Open 6:654–63
    [Google Scholar]
16. Chen W-S, Chen Y-J, Huang Y-A, Hsieh B-Y, Chiu H-C et al. 2017. Ran-dependent TPX2 activation promotes acentrosomal microtubule nucleation in neurons. Sci. Rep. 7:42297
    [Google Scholar]
17. Chinen T, Liu P, Shioda S, Pagel J, Cerikan B et al. 2015. The γ-tubulin-specific inhibitor gatastatin reveals temporal requirements of microtubule nucleation during the cell cycle. Nat. Commun. 6:8722
    [Google Scholar]
18. Choi Y-K, Liu P, Sze SK, Dai C, Qi RZ. 2010. CDK5RAP2 stimulates microtubule nucleation by the γ-tubulin ring complex. J. Cell Biol. 191:1089–95
    [Google Scholar]
19. Clausen T, Ribbeck K. 2007. Self-organization of anastral spindles by synergy of dynamic instability, autocatalytic microtubule production, and a spatial signaling gradient. PLOS ONE 2:e244
    [Google Scholar]
20. Consolati T, Locke J, Roostalu J, Chen ZA, Gannon J et al. 2020. Microtubule nucleation properties of single human γTuRCs explained by their cryo-EM structure. Dev. Cell 53:603–17.e8
    [Google Scholar]
21. Cota RR, Teixido-Travesa N, Ezquerra A, Eibes S, Lacasa C et al. 2017. MZT1 regulates microtubule nucleation by linking γTuRC assembly to adapter-mediated targeting and activation. J. Cell Sci. 130:406–19
    [Google Scholar]
22. Courthéoux T, Reboutier D, Vazeille T, Cremet J-Y, Benaud C et al. 2019. Microtubule nucleation during central spindle assembly requires NEDD1 phosphorylation on serine 405 by Aurora A. J. Cell Sci. 132:jcs231118
    [Google Scholar]
23. Cunha-Ferreira I, Chazeau A, Buijs RR, Stucchi R, Will L et al. 2018. The HAUS complex is a key regulator of non-centrosomal microtubule organization during neuronal development. Cell Rep. 24:791–800
    [Google Scholar]
24. David AF, Roudot P, Legant WR, Betzig E, Danuser G, Gerlich DW. 2019. Augmin accumulation on long-lived microtubules drives amplification and kinetochore-directed growth. J. Cell Biol. 218:2150–68
    [Google Scholar]
25. de Cárcer G. 2019. The mitotic cancer target Polo-like kinase 1: oncogene or tumor suppressor?. Genes 10:208
    [Google Scholar]
26. Decker F, Oriola D, Dalton B, Brugués J. 2018. Autocatalytic microtubule nucleation determines the size and mass of Xenopus laevis egg extract spindles. eLife 7:e31149
    [Google Scholar]
27. Ding Y, Herman JA, Toledo CM, Lang JM, Corrin P et al. 2017. ZNF131 suppresses centrosome fragmentation in glioblastoma stem-like cells through regulation of HAUS5. Oncotarget 8:48545–62
    [Google Scholar]
28. Dráber P, Dráberová E. 2021. Dysregulation of microtubule nucleating proteins in cancer cells. Cancers 13:5638
    [Google Scholar]
29. Dráberová E, D'Agostino L, Caracciolo V, Sládková V, Sulimenko T et al. 2015. Overexpression and nucleolar localization of γ-tubulin small complex proteins GCP2 and GCP3 in glioblastoma. J. Neuropathol. Exp. Neurol. 74:723–42
    [Google Scholar]
30. Ebisu H, Shintani K, Chinen T, Nagumo Y, Shioda S et al. 2020. Dual inhibition of γ-tubulin and Plk1 induces mitotic cell death. Front. Pharmacol. 11:620185
    [Google Scholar]
31. Eckerdt F, Eyers PA, Lewellyn AL, Prigent C, Maller JL. 2008. Spindle pole regulation by a discrete Eg5-interacting domain in TPX2. Curr. Biol. 18:519–25
    [Google Scholar]
32. Eckerdt F, Pascreau G, Phistry M, Lewellyn AL, DePaoli-Roach AA, Maller JL. 2009. Phosphorylation of TPX2 by Plx1 enhances activation of Aurora A. Cell Cycle 8:2413–19
    [Google Scholar]
33. Edzuka T, Yamada L, Kanamaru K, Sawada H, Goshima G. 2014. Identification of the augmin complex in the filamentous fungus Aspergillus nidulans. PLOS ONE 9:e101471
    [Google Scholar]
34. Eibes S, Gallisa-Sune N, Rosas-Salvans M, Martinez-Delgado P, Vernos I, Roig J. 2018. Nek9 phosphorylation defines a new role for TPX2 in Eg5-dependent centrosome separation before nuclear envelope breakdown. Curr. Biol. 28:121–29.e4
    [Google Scholar]
35. Findeisen P, Muhlhausen S, Dempewolf S, Hertzog J, Zietlow A et al. 2014. Six subgroups and extensive recent duplications characterize the evolution of the eukaryotic tubulin protein family. Genome Biol. Evol. 6:2274–88
    [Google Scholar]
36. Flor-Parra I, Iglesias-Romero AB, Chang F 2018. The XMAP215 ortholog Alp14 promotes microtubule nucleation in fission yeast. Curr. Biol. 28:1681–91.e4
    [Google Scholar]
37. Forbes DJ, Travesa A, Nord MS, Bernis C. 2015. Nuclear transport factors: global regulation of mitosis. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 35:78–90
    [Google Scholar]
38. Fox JC, Howard AE, Currie JD, Rogers SL, Slep KC. 2014. The XMAP215 family drives microtubule polymerization using a structurally diverse TOG array. Mol. Biol. Cell 25:2375–92
    [Google Scholar]
39. Fry AM, O'Regan L, Montgomery J, Adib R, Bayliss R. 2016. EML proteins in microtubule regulation and human disease. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 44:1281–88
    [Google Scholar]
40. Fu J, Bian M, Xin G, Deng Z, Luo J et al. 2015. TPX2 phosphorylation maintains metaphase spindle length by regulating microtubule flux. J. Cell Biol. 210:373–83
    [Google Scholar]
41. Gai Y, Cook B, Setru S, Stone HA, Petry S. 2021. Confinement size determines the architecture of Ran-induced microtubule networks. Soft Matter 17:5921–31
    [Google Scholar]
42. Gard DL, Becker BE, Romney SJ. 2004. MAPping the eukaryotic tree of life: structure, function, and evolution of the MAP215/Dis1 family of microtubule-associated proteins. Int. Rev. Cytol. 239:179–272
    [Google Scholar]
43. Gard DL, Kirschner MW. 1987. A microtubule-associated protein from Xenopus eggs that specifically promotes assembly at the plus-end. J. Cell Biol. 105:2203–15
    [Google Scholar]
44. Garrido G, Vernos I. 2016. Non-centrosomal TPX2-dependent regulation of the Aurora A kinase: functional implications for healthy and pathological cell division. Front. Oncol. 6:88
    [Google Scholar]
45. Giesecke A, Stewart M. 2010. Novel binding of the mitotic regulator TPX2 (target protein for Xenopus kinesin-like protein 2) to importin-α. J. Biol. Chem. 285:17628–35
    [Google Scholar]
46. Gomez-Ferreria MA, Bashkurov M, Helbig AO, Larsen B, Pawson T et al. 2012. Novel NEDD1 phosphorylation sites regulate γ-tubulin binding and mitotic spindle assembly. J. Cell Sci. 125:3745–51
    [Google Scholar]
47. Goshima G. 2011. Identification of a TPX2-like microtubule-associated protein in Drosophila. PLOS ONE 6:e28120
    [Google Scholar]
48. Goshima G, Mayer M, Zhang N, Stuurman N, Vale RD. 2008. Augmin: a protein complex required for centrosome-independent microtubule generation within the spindle. J. Cell Biol. 181:421–29
    [Google Scholar]
49. Goshima G, Wollman R, Goodwin SS, Zhang N, Scholey JM et al. 2007. Genes required for mitotic spindle assembly in Drosophila S2 cells. Science 316:417–21
    [Google Scholar]
50. Groen AC, Cameron LA, Coughlin M, Miyamoto DT, Mitchison TJ, Ohi R. 2004. XRHAMM functions in ran-dependent microtubule nucleation and pole formation during anastral spindle assembly. Curr. Biol. 14:1801–11
    [Google Scholar]
51. Gruss OJ, Carazo-Salas RE, Schatz CA, Guarguaglini G, Kast J et al. 2001. Ran induces spindle assembly by reversing the inhibitory effect of importin α on TPX2 activity. Cell 104:83–93
    [Google Scholar]
52. Gruss OJ, Vernos I. 2004. The mechanism of spindle assembly: functions of Ran and its target TPX2. J. Cell Biol. 166:949–55
    [Google Scholar]
53. Guillet V, Knibiehler M, Gregory-Pauron L, Remy MH, Chemin C et al. 2011. Crystal structure of γ-tubulin complex protein GCP4 provides insight into microtubule nucleation. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 18:915–19
    [Google Scholar]
54. Gunawardane RN, Martin OC, Zheng Y. 2003. Characterization of a new γTuRC subunit with WD repeats. Mol. Biol. Cell 14:1017–26
    [Google Scholar]
55. Gunzelmann J, Rüthnick D, Lin T-C, Zhang W, Neuner A et al. 2018. The microtubule polymerase Stu2 promotes oligomerization of the γ-TuSC for cytoplasmic microtubule nucleation. eLife 7:e39932
    [Google Scholar]
56. Haren L, Remy MH, Bazin I, Callebaut I, Wright M, Merdes A. 2006. NEDD1-dependent recruitment of the γ-tubulin ring complex to the centrosome is necessary for centriole duplication and spindle assembly. J. Cell Biol. 172:505–15
    [Google Scholar]
57. Ho C-MK, Hotta T, Kong Z, Zeng CJT, Sun J et al. 2011. Augmin plays a critical role in organizing the spindle and phragmoplast microtubule arrays in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 23:2606–18
    [Google Scholar]
58. Howard AE, Fox JC, Slep KC. 2015. Drosophila melanogaster mini spindles TOG3 utilizes unique structural elements to promote domain stability and maintain a TOG1- and TOG2-like tubulin-binding surface. J. Biol. Chem. 290:10149–62
    [Google Scholar]
59. Hsia K-C, Wilson-Kubalek EM, Dottore A, Hao Q, Tsai K-L et al. 2014. Reconstitution of the augmin complex provides insights into its architecture and function. Nat. Cell Biol. 16:852–63
    [Google Scholar]
60. Huang T-L, Wang H-J, Chang Y-C, Wang S-W, Hsia K-C. 2020. Promiscuous binding of microprotein Mozart1 to γ-tubulin complex mediates specific subcellular targeting to control microtubule array formation. Cell Rep. 31:107836
    [Google Scholar]
61. Hughes JR, Meireles AM, Fisher KH, Garcia A, Antrobus PR et al. 2008. A microtubule interactome: complexes with roles in cell cycle and mitosis. PLOS Biol. 6:e98
    [Google Scholar]
62. Hutchins JR, Toyoda Y, Hegemann B, Poser I, Heriche JK et al. 2010. Systematic analysis of human protein complexes identifies chromosome segregation proteins. Science 328:593–99
    [Google Scholar]
63. Janson ME, Setty TG, Paoletti A, Tran PT. 2005. Efficient formation of bipolar microtubule bundles requires microtubule-bound γ-tubulin complexes. J. Cell Biol. 169:297–308
    [Google Scholar]
64. Johmura Y, Soung N-K, Park J-E, Yu LR, Zhou M et al. 2011. Regulation of microtubule-based microtubule nucleation by mammalian polo-like kinase 1. PNAS 108:11446–51
    [Google Scholar]
65. Kamasaki T, O'Toole E, Kita S, Osumi M, Usukura J et al. 2013. Augmin-dependent microtubule nucleation at microtubule walls in the spindle. J. Cell Biol. 202:25–33
    [Google Scholar]
66. King BR, Moritz M, Kim H, Agard DA, Asbury CL, Davis TN. 2020. XMAP215 and γ-tubulin additively promote microtubule nucleation in purified solutions. Mol. Biol. Cell 31:2187–94
    [Google Scholar]
67. King MR, Petry S. 2020. Phase separation of TPX2 enhances and spatially coordinates microtubule nucleation. Nat. Commun. 11:270
    [Google Scholar]
68. Kirik A, Ehrhardt DW, Kirik V. 2012. TONNEAU2/FASS regulates the geometry of microtubule nucleation and cortical array organization in interphase Arabidopsis cells. Plant Cell 24:1158–70
    [Google Scholar]
69. Knop M, Pereira G, Geissler S, Grein K, Schiebel E. 1997. The spindle pole body component Spc97p interacts with the γ-tubulin of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and functions in microtubule organization and spindle pole body duplication. EMBO J. 16:1550–64
    [Google Scholar]
70. Kollman JM, Polka JK, Zelter A, Davis TN, Agard DA. 2010. Microtubule nucleating γ-TuSC assembles structures with 13-fold microtubule-like symmetry. Nature 466:879–82
    [Google Scholar]
71. Kong Z, Hotta T, Lee YR, Horio T, Liu B. 2010. The γ-tubulin complex protein GCP4 is required for organizing functional microtubule arrays in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell 22:191–204
    [Google Scholar]
72. Lawo S, Bashkurov M, Mullin M, Ferreria MG, Kittler R et al. 2009. HAUS, the 8-subunit human Augmin complex, regulates centrosome and spindle integrity. Curr. Biol. 19:816–26
    [Google Scholar]
73. Lee YJ, Hiwatashi Y, Hotta T, Xie T, Doonan JH, Liu B. 2017. The mitotic function of Augmin is dependent on its microtubule-associated protein subunit EDE1 in Arabidopsis thaliana. Curr. Biol. 27:3891–97.e4
    [Google Scholar]
74. Lin T-C, Neuner A, Schlosser YT, Scharf AND, Weber L, Schiebel E. 2014. Cell-cycle dependent phosphorylation of yeast pericentrin regulates γ-TuSC-mediated microtubule nucleation. eLife 3:e02208
    [Google Scholar]
75. Liu P, Choi YK, Qi RZ. 2014. NME7 is a functional component of the γ-tubulin ring complex. Mol. Biol. Cell 25:2017–25
    [Google Scholar]
76. Liu P, Zupa E, Neuner A, Bohler A, Loerke J et al. 2020. Insights into the assembly and activation of the microtubule nucleator γ-TuRC. Nature 578:467–71
    [Google Scholar]
77. Loughlin R, Heald R, Nedelec F. 2010. A computational model predicts Xenopus meiotic spindle organization. J. Cell Biol. 191:1239–49
    [Google Scholar]
78. Luders J, Patel UK, Stearns T. 2006. GCP-WD is a γ-tubulin targeting factor required for centrosomal and chromatin-mediated microtubule nucleation. Nat. Cell Biol. 8:137–47
    [Google Scholar]
79. Luo J, Yang B, Xin G, Sun M, Zhang B et al. 2019. The microtubule-associated protein EML3 regulates mitotic spindle assembly by recruiting the Augmin complex to spindle microtubules. J. Biol. Chem. 294:5643–56
    [Google Scholar]
80. Lynch EM, Groocock LM, Borek WE, Sawin KE. 2014. Activation of the γ-tubulin complex by the Mto1/2 complex. Curr. Biol. 24:896–903
    [Google Scholar]
81. Ma N, Titus J, Gable A, Ross JL, Wadsworth P. 2011. TPX2 regulates the localization and activity of Eg5 in the mammalian mitotic spindle. J. Cell Biol. 195:87–98
    [Google Scholar]
82. Ma N, Tulu US, Ferenz NP, Fagerstrom C, Wilde A, Wadsworth P. 2010. Poleward transport of TPX2 in the mammalian mitotic spindle requires dynein, Eg5, and microtubule flux. Mol. Biol. Cell 21:979–88
    [Google Scholar]
83. Mahoney NM, Goshima G, Douglass AD, Vale RD. 2006. Making microtubules and mitotic spindles in cells without functional centrosomes. Curr. Biol. 16:564–69
    [Google Scholar]
84. Mann BJ, Balchand SK, Wadsworth P. 2017. Regulation of Kif15 localization and motility by the C-terminus of TPX2 and microtubule dynamics. Mol. Biol. Cell 28:65–75
    [Google Scholar]
85. Meireles AM, Fisher KH, Colombie N, Wakefield JG, Ohkura H. 2009. Wac: a new Augmin subunit required for chromosome alignment but not for acentrosomal microtubule assembly in female meiosis. J. Cell Biol. 184:777–84
    [Google Scholar]
86. Murata T, Sonobe S, Baskin TI, Hyodo S, Hasezawa S et al. 2005. Microtubule-dependent microtubule nucleation based on recruitment of γ-tubulin in higher plants. Nat. Cell Biol. 7:961–68
    [Google Scholar]
87. Nakamura M, Hashimoto T. 2009. A mutation in the Arabidopsis γ-tubulin-containing complex causes helical growth and abnormal microtubule branching. J. Cell Sci. 122:2208–17
    [Google Scholar]
88. Neumayer G, Belzil C, Gruss OJ, Nguyen MD. 2014. TPX2: of spindle assembly, DNA damage response, and cancer. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 71:3027–47
    [Google Scholar]
89. Nithianantham S, Cook BD, Beans M, Guo F, Chang F, Al-Bassam J. 2018. Structural basis of tubulin recruitment and assembly by microtubule polymerases with tumor overexpressed gene (TOG) domain arrays. eLife 7:e38922
    [Google Scholar]
90. Oakley BR, Oakley CE, Yoon Y, Jung MK. 1990. γ-Tubulin is a component of the spindle pole body that is essential for microtubule function in Aspergillus nidulans. Cell 61:1289–301
    [Google Scholar]
91. Oakley CE, Oakley BR. 1989. Identification of γ-tubulin, a new member of the tubulin superfamily encoded by mipA gene of Aspergillus nidulans. Nature 338:662–64
    [Google Scholar]
92. Oh D, Yu CH, Needleman DJ. 2016. Spatial organization of the Ran pathway by microtubules in mitosis. PNAS 113:8729–34
    [Google Scholar]
93. Ohba T, Nakamura M, Nishitani H, Nishimoto T. 1999. Self-organization of microtubule asters induced in Xenopus egg extracts by GTP-bound Ran. Science 284:1356–58
    [Google Scholar]
94. Olsen JV, Vermeulen M, Santamaria A, Kumar C, Miller ML et al. 2010. Quantitative phosphoproteomics reveals widespread full phosphorylation site occupancy during mitosis. Sci. Signal. 3:ra3
    [Google Scholar]
95. Petry S, Groen AC, Ishihara K, Mitchison TJ, Vale RD. 2013. Branching microtubule nucleation in Xenopus egg extracts mediated by augmin and TPX2. Cell 152:768–77
    [Google Scholar]
96. Petry S, Pugieux C, Nedelec FJ, Vale RD. 2011. Augmin promotes meiotic spindle formation and bipolarity in Xenopus egg extracts. PNAS 108:14473–78
    [Google Scholar]
97. Peuchen EH, Cox OF, Sun L, Hebert AS, Coon JJ et al. 2017. Phosphorylation dynamics dominate the regulated proteome during early Xenopus development. Sci. Rep. 7:15647
    [Google Scholar]
98. Pignocchi C, Minns GE, Nesi N, Koumproglou R, Kitsios G et al. 2009. ENDOSPERM DEFECTIVE1 is a novel microtubule-associated protein essential for seed development in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 21:90–105
    [Google Scholar]
99. Pinyol R, Scrofani J, Vernos I. 2013. The role of NEDD1 phosphorylation by Aurora A in chromosomal microtubule nucleation and spindle function. Curr. Biol. 23:143–49
    [Google Scholar]
100. Reid TA, Schuster BM, Mann BJ, Balchand SK, Plooster M et al. 2016. Suppression of microtubule assembly kinetics by the mitotic protein TPX2. J. Cell Sci. 129:1319–28
     [Google Scholar]
101. Roostalu J, Cade NI, Surrey T. 2015. Complementary activities of TPX2 and chTOG constitute an efficient importin-regulated microtubule nucleation module. Nat. Cell Biol. 17:1422–34
     [Google Scholar]
102. Roostalu J, Surrey T. 2017. Microtubule nucleation: beyond the template. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 18:702–10
     [Google Scholar]
103. Rostkova E, Burgess SG, Bayliss R, Pfuhl M. 2018. Solution NMR assignment of the C-terminal domain of human chTOG. Biomol. NMR Assign. 12:221–24
     [Google Scholar]
104. Safari MS, King MR, Brangwynne CP, Petry S. 2021. Interaction of spindle assembly factor TPX2 with importins-α/β inhibits protein phase separation. J. Biol. Chem. 297:100998
     [Google Scholar]
105. Samejima I, Miller VJ, Groocock LM, Sawin KE. 2008. Two distinct regions of Mto1 are required for normal microtubule nucleation and efficient association with the γ-tubulin complex in vivo. J. Cell Sci. 121:3971–80
     [Google Scholar]
106. Sanchez-Huertas C, Freixo F, Viais R, Lacasa C, Soriano E, Luders J. 2016. Non-centrosomal nucleation mediated by augmin organizes microtubules in post-mitotic neurons and controls axonal microtubule polarity. Nat. Commun. 7:12187
     [Google Scholar]
107. Sanchez-Huertas C, Luders J. 2015. The augmin connection in the geometry of microtubule networks. Curr. Biol. 25:R294–99
     [Google Scholar]
108. Schatz CA, Santarella R, Hoenger A, Karsenti E, Mattaj IW et al. 2003. Importin α-regulated nucleation of microtubules by TPX2. EMBO J. 22:2060–70
     [Google Scholar]
109. Schvartzman JM, Sotillo R, Benezra R. 2010. Mitotic chromosomal instability and cancer: mouse modelling of the human disease. Nat. Rev. Cancer 10:102–15
     [Google Scholar]
110. Schweizer N, Haren L, Dutto I, Viais R, Lacasa C et al. 2021. Sub-centrosomal mapping identifies augmin-γTuRC as part of a centriole-stabilizing scaffold. Nat. Commun. 12:6042
     [Google Scholar]
111. Scrofani J, Sardon T, Meunier S, Vernos I. 2015. Microtubule nucleation in mitosis by a RanGTP-dependent protein complex. Curr. Biol. 25:131–40
     [Google Scholar]
112. Setru SU, Gouveia B, Alfaro-Aco R, Shaevitz JW, Stone HA, Petry S. 2021. A hydrodynamic instability drives protein droplet formation on microtubules to nucleate branches. Nat. Phys. 17:493–98
     [Google Scholar]
113. Shah SP, Morin RD, Khattra J, Prentice L, Pugh T et al. 2009. Mutational evolution in a lobular breast tumour profiled at single nucleotide resolution. Nature 461:7265809–13
     [Google Scholar]
114. Song JG, King MR, Zhang R, Kadzik RS, Thawani A, Petry S. 2018. Mechanism of how augmin directly targets the γ-tubulin ring complex to microtubules. J. Cell Biol. 217:2417–28
     [Google Scholar]
115. Steblyanko Y, Rajendraprasad G, Osswald M, Eibes S, Jacome A et al. 2020. Microtubule poleward flux in human cells is driven by the coordinated action of four kinesins. EMBO J. 39:e105432
     [Google Scholar]
116. Tanenbaum ME, Macurek L, Janssen A, Geers EF, Alvarez-Fernandez M, Medema RH. 2009. Kif15 cooperates with Eg5 to promote bipolar spindle assembly. Curr. Biol. 19:1703–11
     [Google Scholar]
117. Tariq A, Green L, Jeynes JCG, Soeller C, Wakefield JG. 2020. In vitro reconstitution of branching microtubule nucleation. eLife 9:e49769
     [Google Scholar]
118. Thawani A, Kadzik RS, Petry S. 2018. XMAP215 is a microtubule nucleation factor that functions synergistically with the γ-tubulin ring complex. Nat. Cell Biol. 20:575–85
     [Google Scholar]
119. Thawani A, Rale MJ, Coudray N, Bhabha G, Stone HA et al. 2020. The transition state and regulation of γ-TuRC-mediated microtubule nucleation revealed by single molecule microscopy. eLife 9:e54253
     [Google Scholar]
120. Thawani A, Stone HA, Shaevitz JW, Petry S. 2019. Spatiotemporal organization of branched microtubule networks. eLife 8:e43890
     [Google Scholar]
121. Tian J, Kong Z. 2019. The role of the augmin complex in establishing microtubule arrays. J. Exp. Bot. 70:3035–41
     [Google Scholar]
122. Tiwary AK, Zheng Y. 2019. Protein phase separation in mitosis. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 60:92–98
     [Google Scholar]
123. Tovey CA, Conduit PT. 2018. Microtubule nucleation by γ-tubulin complexes and beyond. Essays Biochem. 62:765–80
     [Google Scholar]
124. Traversi G, Staid DS, Fiore M, Percario Z, Trisciuoglio D et al. 2019. A novel resveratrol derivative induces mitotic arrest, centrosome fragmentation and cancer cell death by inhibiting γ-tubulin. Cell Div 14:3
     [Google Scholar]
125. Tsai CY, Ngo B, Tapadia A, Hsu P-H, Wu G, Lee W-H. 2011. Aurora-A phosphorylates Augmin complex component Hice1 protein at an N-terminal serine/threonine cluster to modulate its microtubule binding activity during spindle assembly. J. Biol. Chem. 286:30097–106
     [Google Scholar]
126. Uehara R, Goshima G. 2010. Functional central spindle assembly requires de novo microtubule generation in the interchromosomal region during anaphase. J. Cell Biol. 191:259–67
     [Google Scholar]
127. Uehara R, Nozawa RS, Tomioka A, Petry S, Vale RD et al. 2009. The augmin complex plays a critical role in spindle microtubule generation for mitotic progression and cytokinesis in human cells. PNAS 106:6998–7003
     [Google Scholar]
128. van Gijn SE, Wierenga E, van den Tempel N, Kok YP, Heijink AM et al. 2019. TPX2/Aurora kinase A signaling as a potential therapeutic target in genomically unstable cancer cells. Oncogene 38:852–67
     [Google Scholar]
129. Verma V, Maresca TJ. 2019. Direct observation of branching MT nucleation in living animal cells. J. Cell Biol. 218:2829–40
     [Google Scholar]
130. Viais R, Fariña-Mosquera M, Villamor-Payà M, Watanabe S, Palenzuela L et al. 2021. Augmin deficiency in neural stem cells causes p53-dependent apoptosis and aborts brain development. eLife 10:e67989
     [Google Scholar]
131. Vos JW, Pieuchot L, Evrard JL, Janski N, Bergdoll M et al. 2008. The plant TPX2 protein regulates prospindle assembly before nuclear envelope breakdown. Plant Cell 20:2783–97
     [Google Scholar]
132. Wainman A, Buster DW, Duncan T, Metz J, Ma A et al. 2009. A new Augmin subunit, Msd1, demonstrates the importance of mitotic spindle-templated microtubule nucleation in the absence of functioning centrosomes. Genes Dev. 23:1876–81
     [Google Scholar]
133. Watanabe S, Shioi G, Furuta Y, Goshima G. 2016. Intra-spindle microtubule assembly regulates clustering of microtubule-organizing centers during early mouse development. Cell Rep. 15:54–60
     [Google Scholar]
134. Widlund PO, Stear JH, Pozniakovsky A, Zanic M, Reber S et al. 2011. XMAP215 polymerase activity is built by combining multiple tubulin-binding TOG domains and a basic lattice-binding region. PNAS 108:2741–46
     [Google Scholar]
135. Wieczorek M, Bechstedt S, Chaaban S, Brouhard GJ. 2015. Microtubule-associated proteins control the kinetics of microtubule nucleation. Nat. Cell Biol. 17:907–16
     [Google Scholar]
136. Wieczorek M, Huang T-L, Urnavicius L, Hsia K-C, Kapoor TM. 2020a. MZT proteins form multi-faceted structural modules in the γ-tubulin ring complex. Cell Rep. 31:107791
     [Google Scholar]
137. Wieczorek M, Urnavicius L, Ti SC, Molloy KR, Chait BT, Kapoor TM. 2020b. Asymmetric molecular architecture of the human γ-tubulin ring complex. Cell 180:165–75.e16
     [Google Scholar]
138. Wittmann T, Boleti H, Antony C, Karsenti E, Vernos I. 1998. Localization of the kinesin-like protein Xklp2 to spindle poles requires a leucine zipper, a microtubule-associated protein, and dynein. J. Cell Biol. 143:673–85
     [Google Scholar]
139. Wittmann T, Wilm M, Karsenti E, Vernos I. 2000. TPX2, a novel Xenopus MAP involved in spindle pole organization. J. Cell Biol. 149:1405–18
     [Google Scholar]
140. Wu G, Lin Y-T, Wei R, Chen Y, Shan Z, Lee W-H. 2008. Hice1, a novel microtubule-associated protein required for maintenance of spindle integrity and chromosomal stability in human cells. Mol. Cell. Biol. 28:3652–62
     [Google Scholar]
141. Wurtz M, Zupa E, Atorino ES, Neuner A, Bohler A et al. 2022. Modular assembly of the principal microtubule nucleator γ-TuRC. Nat. Commun. 13:473
     [Google Scholar]
142. Yang G, Cameron LA, Maddox PS, Salmon ED, Danuser G. 2008. Regional variation of microtubule flux reveals microtubule organization in the metaphase meiotic spindle. J. Cell Biol. 182:631–39
     [Google Scholar]
143. Yi P, Goshima G. 2018. Microtubule nucleation and organization without centrosomes. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 46:1–7
     [Google Scholar]
144. Zahreddine H, Borden KL. 2013. Mechanisms and insights into drug resistance in cancer. Front. Pharmacol. 4:28
     [Google Scholar]
145. Zasadil LM, Andersen KA, Yeum D, Rocque GB, Wilke LG et al. 2014. Cytotoxicity of paclitaxel in breast cancer is due to chromosome missegregation of multipolar spindles. Sci. Transl. Med. 6:3007965
     [Google Scholar]
146. Zhang R, Roostalu J, Surrey T, Nogales E. 2017. Structural insight into TPX2-stimulated microtubule assembly. eLife 6:e30959
     [Google Scholar]
147. Zhang X, Chen Q, Feng J, Hou J, Yang F et al. 2009. Sequential phosphorylation of Nedd1 by Cdk1 and Plk1 is required for targeting of the γTuRC to the centrosome. J. Cell Sci. 122:2240–51
     [Google Scholar]
148. Zhang X, Zhuang R, Ye Q, Zhuo J, Chen K et al. 2019. High expression of human AugminComplex Submit 3 indicates poor prognosis and associates with tumor progression in hepatocellular carcinoma. J. Cancer 10:1434–43
     [Google Scholar]
149. Zheng Y, Wong ML, Alberts B, Mitchison T. 1995. Nucleation of microtubule assembly by a γ-tubulin-containing ring complex. Nature 378:578–83
     [Google Scholar]
150. Zhu H, Coppinger JA, Jang CY, Yates JR 3rd, Fang G. 2008. FAM29A promotes microtubule amplification via recruitment of the NEDD1-γ-tubulin complex to the mitotic spindle. J. Cell Biol. 183:835–48
     [Google Scholar]
151. Zou J, Huang R-Y, Jiang F-N, Chen D-X, Wang C et al. 2018. Overexpression of TPX2 is associated with progression and prognosis of prostate cancer. Oncol. Lett. 16:2823–32
     [Google Scholar]
152. Zupa E, Zheng A, Neuner A, Wurtz M, Liu P et al. 2020. The cryo-EM structure of a γ-TuSC elucidates architecture and regulation of minimal microtubule nucleation systems. Nat. Commun. 11:5705
     [Google Scholar]