1932

Abstract

Social norms affect environmental quality. But what exactly is a social norm? Environmental economists studying the topic draw on diverse scholarly traditions and may not have the same phenomenon in mind when using the concept. For example, social norms may refer to common, but not necessarily socially approved, behaviors; to internalized ethical rules; or to one of several equilibria in a coordination game. I first discuss some of the definitions used in the environmental economics literature. Then, I outline a simple framework for analysis of voluntary contributions to public goods. Using this framework, I illustrate differences and similarities between altruism, moral norms, and social norms and discuss implications for environmental policies. In particular, when a social norm represents one of several stable equilibria, policy can potentially invoke abrupt and dramatic behavioral changes.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-resource-100517-023232
2018-10-05
2024-04-26
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/resource/10/1/annurev-resource-100517-023232.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-resource-100517-023232&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Akerlof GA 1980. A theory of custom, of which unemployment may be one consequence. Q. J. Econ. 94:4749–75
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Allcott H 2011. Social norms and energy conservation. J. Public Econ. 95:51982–2095
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Andreoni J 1988. Privately provided public goods in a large economy: the limits of altruism. J. Public Econ. 35:57–73
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Andreoni J 1990. Impure altruism and donations to public goods: a theory of warm-glow giving. Econ. J. 100:464–77
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Aoki M 2011. Linking economic and social-exchange games: from the community norm to CSR. Social Capital, Corporate Social Responsibility, Economic Behaviour and Performance L Sacconi, GD Antoni 129–48 New York: Palgrave Macmillan
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Aronson E, Wilson TD, Akert RM 2005. Social Psychology Harlow, UK: Pearson Educ
  7. Arrow K 1970. Political and economic evaluation of social effects and externalities. The Analysis of Public Output J Margolis 1–30 New York: NBER
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Asheim GB 2010. Strategic use of environmental information. Environ. Resour. Econ. 46:2207–16
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Basu K 2000. Prelude to Political Economy: A Study of the Social and Political Foundations of Economics Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  10. Benabou R, Tirole J 2006. Incentives and prosocial behavior. Am. Econ. Rev. 96:51652–78
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Benaïm M, Weibull JW 2003. Deterministic approximation of stochastic evolution in games. Econometrica 71:3873–903
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Bergstrom T, Blume L, Varian H 1986. On the private provision of public goods. J. Public Econ. 29:25–49
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Bernheim BD 1986. On the voluntary and involuntary provision of public goods. Am. Econ. Rev. 76:787–93
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Bicchieri C 2006. The Grammar of Society: The Nature and Dynamics of Social Norms Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  15. Binmore KG 2005. Natural Justice Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
  16. Börgers T, Sarin R 1997. Learning through reinforcement and replicator dynamics. J. Econ. Theory 77:1–14
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Bouma J, Bulte E, van Soest D 2008. Trust and cooperation: social capital and community resource management. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 56:2155–66
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Bourdieu P 1979. La Distinction: Critique Sociale du Jugement Paris: Minuit
  19. Brekke KA, Johansson-Stenman O 2008. The behavioural economics of climate change. Oxf. Rev. Econ. Policy 24:2280–97
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Brekke KA, Kipperberg G, Nyborg K 2010. Social interaction in responsibility ascription: the case of household recycling. Land Econ 86:766–84
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Brekke KA, Kverndokk S, Nyborg K 2003. An economic model of moral motivation. J. Public Econ. 87:9–101967–83
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Brent DA, Friesen L, Gangadharan L, Leibbrandt A 2016. Behavioral insights from field experiments in environmental economics. Int. Rev. Environ. Resour. Econ. 10:95–143
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Brock WA, Durlauf SN 2001. Discrete choice with social interactions. Rev. Econ. Stud. 68:235–60
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Brown G, Hagen DA 2010. Behavioral economics and the environment. Environ. Resour. Econ. 46:139–46
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Carattini S, Levin S, Tavoni A 2017. Cooperation in the climate commons Work. Pap. 259, Grantham Res. Inst. Clim. Change. Environ. London:
  26. Cardenas JC 2011. Social norms and behavior in the local commons as seen through the lens of field experiments. Environ. Resour. Econ. 48:3451–85
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Carlsson F, Johansson-Stenman O 2012. Behavioral economics and environmental policy. Annu. Rev. Resour. Econ. 4:75–99
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Carlsson F, Johansson-Stenman O, Khanh NP 2016. Funding a new bridge in rural Vietnam: a field experiment on social influence and default contributions. Oxf. Econ. Pap. 67:4987–1014
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Chaudhury A 2011. Sustaining cooperation in laboratory public goods experiments: a selective survey of the literature. Exp. Econ. 14:147–83
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Cialdini RB, Goldstein NJ 2004. Social influence: compliance and conformity. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 55:591–621
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Cialdini RB, Kallgren CA, Reno RR 1991. A focus theory of normative conduct: a theoretical refinement and reevaluation of the role of norms in human behavior. Adv. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 24:201–34
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Coleman JS 1990. Foundations of Social Theory Cambridge, MA: Belknap
  33. Cox JC, Friedman D, Gjerstad S 2007. A tractable model of reciprocity and fairness. Games Econ. Behav. 59:117–45
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Croson R, Treich N 2014. Behavioral environmental economics: promises and challenges. Environ. Resour. Econ. 58:3335–51
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Czajkowski M, Hanley N, Nyborg K 2017. Social norms, morals and self-interest as determinants of pro-environment behaviours: the case of household recycling. Environ. Resour. Econ. 66:647–70
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Dasgupta PS, Ehrlich PR 2013. Pervasive externalities at the population, consumption, and environment nexus. Science 340:324–28
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Dasgupta P, Southerton D, Ulph A, Ulph D 2016. Consumer behaviour with environmental and social externalities: implications for analysis and policy. Environ. Resour. Econ. 65:1191–226
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Dufwenberg M, Kirchsteiger G 2004. A theory of sequential reciprocity. Games Econ. Behav. 47:2268–98
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Ehrlich PR, Levin SA 2005. The evolution of norms. PLOS Biol 3:e194
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Elster J 1989. Social norms and economic theory. J. Econ. Perspect. 3:499–117
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Falk A, Fischbacher U 2006. A theory of reciprocity. Games Econ. Behav. 54:293–315
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Farrow K, Grolleau G, Ibanez L 2017. Social norms and pro-environmental behavior: a review of the evidence. Ecol. Econ. 140:1–13
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Fehr E, Gächter S 2002. Altruistic punishment in humans. Nature 415:137–40
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Fudenberg D, Levine D 1999. The Theory of Learning in Games Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
  45. Gale J, Binmore KG, Samuelson L 1995. Learning to be imperfect: the ultimatum game. Games Econ. Behav. 8:56–90
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Gavrilets S, Richerson PJ 2017. Collective action and the evolution of social norm internalization. PNAS 114:236068–73
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Gintis H 2010. Social norms as choreography. Politics Philos. Econ. 9:3251–64
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Goldstein NJ, Cialdini RB, Griskevicius V 2008. A room with a viewpoint: using social norms to motivate environmental conservation in hotels. J. Consum. Res. 35:472–82
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Halvorsen B 2008. Effects of norms and opportunity cost of time on household recycling. Land Econ 84:3501–16
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Hauge K 2015. Moral opinions are conditional on the behavior of others. Rev. Soc. Econ. 73:2154–75
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Holy L, Stuchlik M 1983. Actions, Norms and Representations: Foundations of Anthropological Enquiry Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Johansson PO 1993. Cost-Benefit Analysis of Environmental Change Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
  53. Johansson-Stenman O, Konow J 2010. Fair air: distributive justice and environmental economics. Environ. Resour. Econ. 46:2147–66
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Kallbekken S, Westskog H, Mideksa T 2010. Appeals to social norms as policy instruments to address consumption externalities. J. Socio-Econ. 39:4447–54
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Lange A, Löschel A, Vogt C, Ziegler A 2010. On the self-interested use of equity in international climate negotiations. Eur. Econ. Rev. 542010:359–75
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Ledyard JO 1995. Public goods: a survey of experimental research. The Handbook of Experimental Economics JH Kagel, AE Roth 111–94 Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Lieberman MD 2013. Social: Why Our Brains Are Wired to Connect. New York: Crown
  58. Lindbeck A, Nyberg S, Weibull JW 1999. Social norms and economic incentives in the welfare state. Q. J. Econ. 114:11–35
    [Google Scholar]
  59. List JA, Price MK 2016. The use of field experiments in environmental and resource economics. Rev. Environ. Econ. Policy 10:2206–25
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Mackie G 1996. Ending footbinding and infibulation: a convention account. Am. Sociol. Rev. 61:999–1017
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Mauss M 2011 (1954). Essai sur le Don [The Gift: The Form and Reason for Exchange in Archaic Societies] Mansfield, CT: Martino Publ.
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Michaeli M, Spiro D 2017. From peer pressure to biased norms. Am. Econ. J. Microecon. 9:152–216
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Miller DT, Prentice DA 2016. Changing norms to change behavior. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 67:339–61
    [Google Scholar]
  64. Mintel. 2014. Number of global vegetarian food and drink product launches doubles between 2009 and 2013. Mintel Blog Oct. 1. http://www.mintel.com/press-centre/food-and-drink/number-of-global-vegetarian-food-and-drink-product-launches-doubles-between-2009-and-2013
  65. Nyborg K 2011. I don't want to hear about it: rational ignorance among duty-oriented consumers. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 79:263–74
    [Google Scholar]
  66. Nyborg K 2017. Reciprocal climate negotiators. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. In press. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2017.08.008
    [Crossref]
  67. Nyborg K, Anderies JM, Dannenberg A, Lindahl T, Schill C et al. 2016. Social norms as solutions. Science 354:630842–43
    [Google Scholar]
  68. Nyborg K, Howarth RB, Brekke KA 2006. Green consumers and public policy: on socially contingent moral motivation. Resour. Energy Econ. 28:4351–66
    [Google Scholar]
  69. Nyborg K, Rege M 2003.a On social norms: the evolution of considerate smoking behavior. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 52:323–40
    [Google Scholar]
  70. Nyborg K, Rege M 2003.b Does public policy crowd out private contributions to public goods. ? Public Choice 115:3397–418
    [Google Scholar]
  71. OECD (Organ. Econ. Coop. Dev.). 2017. Tackling Environmental Problems with the Help of Behavioural Insights Paris: OECD http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264273887-en
    [Crossref]
  72. Ostrom E 1990. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action Cambridge, MA: Cambridge Univ. Press
  73. Ostrom E 2000. Collective action and the evolution of social norms. J. Econ. Perspect. 14:137–58
    [Google Scholar]
  74. Postlewaite A 2011. Social norms and social assets. Annu. Rev. Econ. 3:239–59
    [Google Scholar]
  75. Rabin M 1993. Incorporating fairness into game theory and economics. Am. Econ. Rev. 83:1281–1302
    [Google Scholar]
  76. Rege M 2004. Social norms and private provision of public goods. J. Public Econ. Theory 6:165–77
    [Google Scholar]
  77. Reno RR, Cialdini RB, Kallgren CA 1993. The transsituational influence of social norms. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 64:104–12
    [Google Scholar]
  78. Richter A, Grasman J 2013. The transmission of sustainable harvesting norms when agents are conditionally cooperative. Ecol. Econ. 93:202–9
    [Google Scholar]
  79. Roberts RD 1984. A positive model of private charity and public transfers. J. Political Econ. 92:136–48
    [Google Scholar]
  80. Schelling TC 1960. The Strategy of Conflict Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press
  81. Schlüter M, Tavoni A, Levin S 2016. Robustness of norm-driven cooperation in the commons. Proc. R. Soc. B 283:20152431
    [Google Scholar]
  82. Sen AK 1977. Rational fools: a critique of the behavioural foundations of economic theory. Philos. Public Aff. 6:317–44
    [Google Scholar]
  83. Sobel J 2005. Interdependent preferences and reciprocity. J. Econ. Lit. 43:392–436
    [Google Scholar]
  84. Sugden R 1984. Reciprocity: the supply of public goods through voluntary contributions. Econ. J. 94:772–87
    [Google Scholar]
  85. Sugden R 1989. Spontaneous order. J. Econ. Perspect. 3:485–97
    [Google Scholar]
  86. Tabellini G 2008. The scope of cooperation: values and incentives. Q. J. Econ. 123:3905–50
    [Google Scholar]
  87. Taylor P, Jonker L 1978. Evolutionarily stable strategies and game dynamics. Math. Biosci. 40:145–56
    [Google Scholar]
  88. Videras J 2013. Social networks and the environment. Annu. Rev. Resour. Econ. 5:211–26
    [Google Scholar]
  89. Videras J, Owen AL, Conover E, Wu S 2012. The influence of social relationships on pro-environment behaviors. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 63:135–50
    [Google Scholar]
  90. Viscusi WK, Huber J, Bell J 2011. Promoting recycling: private values, social norms, and economic incentives. Am. Econ. Rev. 101:365–70
    [Google Scholar]
  91. Warr PG 1982. Pareto optimal redistribution and private charity. J. Public Econ. 19:131–38
    [Google Scholar]
  92. Weibull J 1995. Evolutionary Game Theory Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
  93. Young HP 1998.a Individual Strategy and Social Structure: An Evolutionary Theory of Institutions Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
  94. Young HP 1998.b Social norms and economic welfare. Eur. Econ. Rev. 42:821–30
    [Google Scholar]
  95. Young HP 2015. The evolution of social norms. Annu. Rev. Econ. 7:359–87
    [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-resource-100517-023232
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-resource-100517-023232
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error