1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Resource Economics
  4. Volume 15, 2023
  5. Article

Annual Review of Resource Economics

Volume 15, 2023

A New Wave of Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Taxes: Are They Meeting Policy Goals and Can We Do Better?

Abstract

Little progress has been made in reducing deaths from chronic noncommunicable diseases associated with being overweight or obese worldwide, prompting the World Health Organization and others to recommend the implementation of taxes on sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs). In response, SSB taxes have been widely implemented over the last decade, and a burgeoning literature aims at understanding their effects. We assess the state of knowledge regarding the impacts of SSB taxes and provide context for the results reported to date based on the recent consumer behavior literature and incentives of supply-chain intermediaries in modern food markets. Evidence suggests only a portion of a tax on distributors or manufacturers is passed forward to consumers, inducing only mild and highly variable impacts on SSB purchases. We argue that the literature provides no consistent evidence that SSB taxes have incentivized increased purchases of healthier beverages and caused overall SSB consumption to decrease. Finally, we consider the efficacy of SSB taxes, alone or in combination with other policies, as part of jurisdictions’ policy goals, including promoting healthier diets, generating revenue, and improving equity.

Keyword(s): chronic noncommunicable diseases, healthy diets, JEL L13, JEL Q13, JEL Q18, obesity, soda tax, sugar-sweetened beverage tax
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-resource-111522-111325
2023-10-05
2024-04-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/resource/15/1/annurev-resource-111522-111325.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-resource-111522-111325&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Abadie A, Diamond A, Hainmueller J. 2015. Comparative politics and the synthetic control method. Am. J. Political Sci. 59:495–510
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Allcott H, Cohen D, Morrison W, Taubinsky D. 2022. When do ‘nudges’ increase welfare? NBER Work. Pap30740
  3. Allcott H, Lockwood BB, Taubinsky D. 2019a. Regressive sin taxes, with an application to the optimal soda tax. Q. J. Econ. 134:31557–1626
     [Google Scholar]
  4. Allcott H, Lockwood BB, Taubinsky D. 2019b. Should we tax sugar-sweetened beverages? An overview of theory and evidence. J. Econ. Perspect. 33:202–27
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Alston JM, MacEwan JP, Okrent AM. 2016. The economics of obesity and related policy. Annu. Rev. Resour. Econ. 8:443–65
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Am. Heart Assoc 2013. BMI in children. American Heart Association https://www.heart.org/en/healthy-living/healthy-eating/losing-weight/bmi-in-children
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Anderson ML, Matsa DA. 2011. Are restaurants really supersizing America?. Am. Econ. Rev. 3:1152–88
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Anderson SP, de Palma A, Kreider B. 2001. Tax incidence in differentiated product oligopoly. J. Public Econ. 81:2173–92
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Andreyeva T, Marple K, Marinello S, Moore TE, Powell L. 2022. Outcomes following taxation of sugar-sweetened beverages: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Netw. Open 5:6e2215276
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Ayala GX, D'Angelo H, Gittelsohn J, Horton L, Ribisl K et al. 2017. Who is behind the stocking of energy-dense foods and beverages in small stores? The importance of food and beverage distributors. Public Health Nutr 20:183333–42
     [Google Scholar]
  11. Barrientos-Gutierrez T, Zepeda-Tello R, Rodrigues ER, Colchero-Aragonés A, Rojas-Martínez R et al. 2017. Expected population weight and diabetes impact of the 1-peso-per-litre tax to sugar sweetened beverages in Mexico. PLOS ONE 12:e0191383
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Basto-Abreu A, Barrientos-Gutiérrez T, Vidaña-Pérez D, Colchero MA, Hernàndez-F M et al. 2019. Cost-effectiveness of the sugar-sweetened beverage excise tax in Mexico. Health Aff 38:1824–31
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Baye I, Schlippenbach V, Wey C. 2018. One-stop shopping behavior, buyer power, and upstream merger incentives. J. Ind. Econ. 66:66–94
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Benabou R, Jean T. 2002. Self-confidence and personal motivation. Q. J. Econ. 117:3871–915
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Berger N, Cummins S, Allen A, Smith RD, Cornelsen L 2020. Patterns of beverage purchases amongst British households: a latent class analysis. PLOS Med 17:9e1003245
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Bollinger B, Leslie P, Sorensen A. 2011. Calorie posting in chain restaurants. Am. Econ. J. Econ. Policy 3:191–128
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Bollinger B, Sexton S. 2018. Local excise taxes, sticky prices, and spillovers: evidence from Berkeley's soda tax SSRN Work. Pap. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3087966
  18. Bonnet C, Réquillart V. 2013. Tax incidence with strategic firms in the soft drink market. J. Public Econ. 106:77–88
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Carillo JD, Mariotti T. 2000. Strategic ignorance as a self-disciplining device. Rev. Econ. Stud. 67:3526–44
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Cawley J, Frisvold D. 2017. The pass-through of taxes on sugar-sweetened beverages to retail prices: the case of Berkeley, California. J. Policy Analysis Manag. 36:2303–26
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Cawley J, Frisvold D, Hill A, Jones D. 2019a. The impact of the Philadelphia beverage tax on purchases and consumption by adults and children. J. Health Econ. 67:102225
     [Google Scholar]
  22. Cawley J, Frisvold D, Hill A, Jones D. 2020. Oakland's sugar-sweetened beverage tax: impacts on prices, purchases and consumption by adults and children. Econ. Hum. Biol. 37:100865
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Cawley J, Meyerhoefer C. 2012. The medical care costs of obesity: an instrumental variables approach. J. Health Econ. 31:1219–30
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Cawley J, Thow AM, Wen K, Frisvold D. 2019b. The economics of taxes on sugar-sweetened beverages: a review of the effects on prices, sales, cross-border shopping, and consumption. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 21:317–38
     [Google Scholar]
  25. CDC (Cent. Dis. Control. Prev.) 2022. Obesity basics. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention https://www.cdc.gov/obesity/basics/
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Chaloupka FJ, Powell LM, Warner KE. 2019. The use of excise taxes to reduce tobacco, alcohol, and sugary beverage consumption. Annu. Rev. Public Health 40:187–201
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Chernozhukov V, Hausman J, Newey W. 2019. Demand analysis with many prices NBER Work. Pap. 26424
  28. Chetty R, Looney A, Kroft K. 2009. Salience and taxation: theory and evidence. Am. Econ. Rev. 99:41145–77
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Colchero MA, Molina M, Guerrero-López CM. 2017a. After Mexico implemented a tax, purchases of sugar-sweetened beverages decreased and water increased: difference by place of residence, household composition, and income level. J. Nutr. 147:1552–57
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Colchero MA, Popkin BM, Rivera JA, Ng SW. 2016. Beverage purchases from stores in Mexico under the excise tax on sugar sweetened beverages: observational study. BMJ 352:h6704
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Colchero MA, Rivera-Dommarco J, Popkin BM, Ng SW. 2017b. In Mexico, evidence of sustained consumer response two years after implementing a sugar-sweetened beverage tax. Health Aff 36:3564–71
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Colchero MA, Salgado JC, Unar-Munguía M, Molina M, Ng S, Rivera-Dommarco JA. 2015. Changes in prices after an excise tax to sweetened sugar beverages was implemented in Mexico: evidence from urban areas. PLOS ONE 10:12e0144408
     [Google Scholar]
  33. Cornelsen L, Smith RD. 2018. Viewpoint: soda taxes—four questions economists need to address. Food Policy 74:138–42
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Daunfeldt S-O, Nordström J, Thunström L 2013. Habit formation in food consumption. The Oxford Handbook of the Economics of Food Consumption and Policy JL Lusk, J Roosen, JF Shogren 770–90. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Debnam J. 2017. Selection effects and heterogeneous demand responses to the Berkeley soda tax vote. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 99:51172–87
     [Google Scholar]
  36. DellaVigna S, Gentzkow M. 2019. Uniform pricing in U.S. retail chains. Q. J. Econ. 134:42011–84
     [Google Scholar]
  37. DellaVigna S, Linos E. 2022. RCTs to scale: comprehensive evidence from two nudge units. Econometrica 90:81–116
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Dickson A, Gehrsitz M, Kemp J. 2021. Does a spoonful of sugar levy help the calories go down? An analysis of the UK soft drinks industry levy IZA Discuss. Pap. 14528, IZA, Bonn, Ger https://docs.iza.org/dp14528.pdf
  39. Diepeveen S, Ling T, Suhrcke M, Roland M, Marteau TM. 2013. Public acceptability of government intervention to change health-related behaviours: a systematic review and narrative synthesis. BMC Public Health 13:756
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Dubé JP. 2005. Differences in dynamic brand competition across markets: an empirical analysis. Mark. Sci. 24:181–95
     [Google Scholar]
  41. Dubois P, Griffith R, O'Connell M. 2020. How well targeted are soda taxes?. Am. Econ. Rev. 110:113661–3704
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Ellickson PB. 2007. Does Sutton apply to supermarkets?. RAND J. Econ. 38:143–59
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Ellickson PB. 2013. Supermarkets as a natural oligopoly. Econ. Inq. 51:21142–54
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Falbe J, Grummon AH, Rojas N, Ryan-Ibarra S, Silver LD, Madsen KA 2020. Implementation of the first U.S. sugar-sweetened beverage tax in Berkeley, CA, 2015–2019. Am. J. Public Health 110:1429–37
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Falbe J, Rojas N, Grummon AH, Madsen KA. 2015. Higher retail prices of sugar-sweetened beverages 3 months after implementation of an excise tax in Berkeley, California. Am. J. Public Health 105:112194–2201
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Falbe J, Thompson HR, Becker CM, Rojas N, McCulloch CE, Madsen KA. 2016. Impact of the Berkeley excise tax on sugar-sweetened beverage consumption. Am. J. Public Health 106:1865–71
     [Google Scholar]
  47. FDA (Food Drug Admin.) 2022. Calories on the menu: information for consumers Nutr. Educ. Res. Mater., Food Drug Admin Silver Spring, MD: https://www.fda.gov/food/nutrition-education-resources-materials/calories-menu
  48. George C, Bancroft C, Salt S, Curley C, Curley C et al. 2021. Successful implementation of the Healthy Diné Nation Act in stores on the Navajo Nation. Prev. Med. Rep. 24:101573
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Griffith R, O'Connell M, Smith K, Stroud R 2019. The evidence on the effects of soft drink taxes IFS Brief. Note BN255, Inst. Fiscal Stud London: https://ifs.org.uk/publications/evidence-effects-soft-drink-taxes
  50. Grummon AH, Lockwood BB, Taubinsky D, Allcott H. 2019. Designing better sugary drink taxes. Science 365:6457989–90
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Hagmann D, Siegrist M, Hartmann C. 2018. Taxes, labels, or nudges? Public acceptance of various interventions designed to reduce sugar intake. Food Policy 79:156–65
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Harding M, Leibtag E, Lovenheim MF. 2012. The heterogeneous geographic and socioeconomic incidence of cigarette taxes: evidence from Nielsen Homescan data. Am. Econ. J. Econ. Policy 4:4169–98
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Harding M, Lovenheim M. 2017. The effect of prices on nutrition: comparing the impact of product- and nutrient-specific taxes. J. Health Econ. 53:53–71
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Herrnstein RJ, Loewenstein GF, Prelec D, Vaughan W Jr. 1993. Utility maximization and melioration: internalities in individual choice. J. Behav. Decis. Making 6:149–85
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Hofman K, Stacey N, Swart EC, Popkin BM, Ng SW. 2021. South Africa's health promotion levy: excise tax findings and equity potential. Obes. Rev. 22:e13301
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Iyer G, Villas-Boas JM. 2003. A bargaining theory of distribution channels. J. Mark. Res. 40:80–100
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Johnson EJ, Goldstein D. 2003. Do defaults save lives?. Science 302:56491338–39
     [Google Scholar]
  58. Just DR, Wansink B. 2011. The flat-rate pricing paradox: conflicting effects of “all-you-can-eat” buffet pricing. Rev. Econ. Stat. 93:1193–200
     [Google Scholar]
  59. Kiesel K. 2012. A definition at last, but what does it all mean? Newspaper coverage of the USDA organic seal and its effects on food purchases. J. Agric. Resour. Econ. 37:134–57
     [Google Scholar]
  60. Kiesel K, Ji M 2021. Did state-mandated restrictions on sugar-sweetened drinks in California high schools increase soda consumption in school neighborhoods?. Appl. Econ. Perspect. Policy 43:1443–75
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Kiesel K, McCluskey JJ, Villas-Boas SB 2011. Nutritional labeling and consumer choices. Annu. Rev. Resour. Econ. 3:141–58
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Kiesel K, Villas-Boas SB 2013. Can information costs affect consumer choice? Nutritional labels in a supermarket experiment. Int. J. Ind. Organ. 31:2153–63
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Krieger J, Bleich SN, Scarmo S, Ng SW. 2021a. Sugar-sweetened beverage reduction policies: progress and promise. Annu. Rev. Public Health 42:439–61
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Krieger J, Magee K, Hennings T, Schoff J, Madsen K 2021b. How sugar-sweetened beverage tax revenues are being used in the United States. Rev. Med. Rep. 23:101388
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Lai C-Y, List JA, Samek A. 2019. Got milk? Using nudges to reduce consumption of added sugars. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 102:154–68
     [Google Scholar]
  66. Lang H. 2022. The impact of soda taxes in the U.S.: empirical evidence and comparison across jurisdictions PhD Diss., Univ. Calif. Davis:
  67. Larsen N, Story M 2009. A review of environmental influences on food choices. Ann. Behav. Med. 38:Suppl. 1S56–73
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Lichtman-Sadot S. 2016. Does banning carbonated beverages in schools decrease student consumption?. J. Public Econ. 140:30–50
     [Google Scholar]
  69. Loewenstein G, Bryce C, Hagmann D, Rajpal S. 2015. Warning: you are about to be nudged. Behav. Sci. Policy 1:135–42
     [Google Scholar]
  70. Mackowiak B, Matejka F, Wiederholt M. 2022. Rational inattention: a review. J. Econ. Lit. 61:1226–73
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Malik VS, Schulze MB, Hu FB. 2006. Intake of sugar-sweetened beverages and weight gain: a systematic review. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 84:2274–88
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Malmendier U. 2021. Exposure, experience, and expertise: why personal histories matter in economics NBER Work. Pap29336
  73. Mazarello Paes V, Hesketh K, O'Malley C, Moore H, Summerbell C et al. 2015. Determinants of sugar-sweetened beverage consumption in young children: a systematic review. Obes. Rev. 16:903–13
     [Google Scholar]
  74. Miller PE, McKinnon AR, Krebs-Smith SM, Subar AF, Chriqui J, Kahle L, Reedy J. 2013. Sugar-sweetened beverage consumption in the U.S.: novel assessment methodology. Am. J. Prev. Med. 45:4416–21
     [Google Scholar]
  75. NICHD (Natl. Inst. Child Health Human Dev.) 2021. What causes obesity & overweight?. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development https://www.nichd.nih.gov/health/topics/obesity/conditioninfo/cause
    [Google Scholar]
  76. O'Donoghue T, Rabin M. 2006. Optimal sin taxes. J. Public Econ. 90:1825–49
     [Google Scholar]
  77. O'Donoghue T, Rabin M. 2015. Present bias: lessons learned and to be learned. Am. Econ. Rev. 105:5273–79
     [Google Scholar]
  78. OEH (Obes. Evid. Hub) 2022. Countries that have taxes on sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs) Prev. Tax Pricing, Obes. Evid. Hub, Aust. https://www.obesityevidencehub.org.au/collections/prevention/countries-that-have-implemented-taxes-on-sugar-sweetened-beverages-ssbs
  79. Okrent AM, Alston JM. 2012. The effects of farm commodity and retail food policies on obesity and economic welfare in the United States. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 94:3611–46
     [Google Scholar]
  80. Park MH, Falconer C, Viner RM, Kinra S. 2012. The impact of childhood obesity on morbidity and mortality in adulthood: a systematic review. Obes. Rev. 13:11985–1000
     [Google Scholar]
  81. Pedroza-Tobias A, Crosbie E, Mialon M, Carriedo A, Schmidt LA. 2021. Food and beverage industry interference in science and policy: efforts to block soda tax implementation in Mexico and prevent international diffusion. BMJ Glob. Health 6:e005662
     [Google Scholar]
  82. Pigou AC. 1920. The Economics of Welfare London: Macmillan
  83. Popkin BM. 2017. Mexican cohort study predates but predicts the type of body composition changes expected from the Mexican sugar-sweetened beverage tax. Am. J. Public Health 107:1702–3
     [Google Scholar]
  84. Popkin BM, Ng SW. 2021. Sugar-sweetened beverage taxes: lessons to date and the future of taxation. PLOS Med 18:e1003412
     [Google Scholar]
  85. Powell LM, Nguyen BT. 2013. Fast-food and full-service restaurant consumption among children and adolescents: effect on energy, beverage, and nutrient intake. JAMA Pediatr 167:14–20
     [Google Scholar]
  86. Roberto CA, Lawman HG, LeVasseur MT, Mitra N, Peterhans A et al. 2019. Association of a beverage tax on sugar-sweetened and artificially sweetened beverages with changes in beverage prices and sales at chain retailers in a large urban setting. JAMA 321:1799–1810
     [Google Scholar]
  87. Rojas C, Wang E. 2021. Do taxes for soda and sugary drinks work? Scanner data evidence from Berkeley and Washington State. Econ. Inq. 59:195–118
     [Google Scholar]
  88. Saitone TL, Sexton RJ. 2017. Agri-food supply chain: evolution and performance with conflicting consumer and societal demands. Eur. Rev. Agric. Econ. 44:4634–57
     [Google Scholar]
  89. Saitone TL, Sexton RJ, Sumner DA. 2015. What happens when food marketers impose restrictive farming practices?. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 97:41021–43
     [Google Scholar]
  90. Scarborough P, Adhikari V, Harrington RA, Elhussein A, Rayner M et al. 2020. Impact of the announcement and implementation of the UK soft drinks industry levy on sugar content, price, product size and number of available soft drinks in the UK, 2015–19: a controlled interrupted time series analysis. PLOS Med 17:2e1003025
     [Google Scholar]
  91. Seiler S, Tuchman A, Yao S. 2021. The impact of soda taxes: pass-through, tax avoidance, and nutritional effects. J. Mark. Res. 58:122–49
     [Google Scholar]
  92. Sharot T, Kanai R, Marston D, Korn C, Rees G, Dolan RJ. 2012. Selectively altering belief formation in the human brain. PNAS 109:17058–62
     [Google Scholar]
  93. Silver LD, Ng SW, Ryan-Ibarra S, Smith Taillie L, Induni M et al. 2017. Changes in prices, sales, consumer spending, and beverage consumption one year after a tax on sugar-sweetened beverages in Berkeley, California, US: a before-and-after study. PLOS Med 14:4e1002283
     [Google Scholar]
  94. Spalding A, Goodhue RE, Kiesel K, Sexton RJ 2022. Economic impacts of food safety incidents in a modern supply chain: E. coli in the romaine lettuce industry. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 105:2597–623
     [Google Scholar]
  95. Stacey N, Edoka I, Hofman K, Swart E, Popkin B, Ng SW. 2021. Changes in beverage purchases following the announcement and implementation of South Africa's Health Promotion Levy: an observational study. Lancet N. Am. Ed. 5:4e199–208
     [Google Scholar]
  96. Stacey N, Mudara C, Ng SW, van Walbeek C, Hofman K, Edoka I. 2019. Sugar-based beverage taxes and beverage prices: evidence from South Africa's Health Promotion Levy. Soc. Sci. Med. 238:112465
     [Google Scholar]
  97. Swinburn B, Kraak VI, Allender S. 2019. The global syndemic of obesity, undernutrition, and climate change: The Lancet Commission report. Lancet 393:791–846
     [Google Scholar]
  98. Task Force Fiscal Policy Health 2019. Health taxes to save lives: employing effective excise taxes on tobacco, alcohol, and sugary beverages Rep., Task Force Fiscal Policy Health, Bloomberg Philanthr New York: https://tobacconomics.org/files/research/512/Health-Taxes-to-Save-Lives-Report.pdf
  99. Taylor RLC, Kaplan S, Villas-Boas SB, Jung K 2019. Soda wars: the effect of a soda tax election on university beverage sales. Econ. Inq. 57:1480–96
     [Google Scholar]
  100. Teng AM, Jones AC, Mizdrak A, Signal L, Genç M, Wilson N. 2019. Impact of sugar-sweetened beverage taxes on purchases and dietary intake: systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes. Rev. 20:1187–1204
     [Google Scholar]
  101. Thomassen Ø, Smith H, Seiler S, Schiraldi P. 2017. Multi-category competition and market power: a model of supermarket pricing. Am. Econ. Rev. 107:82308–51
     [Google Scholar]
  102. Thow AM, Rippin HL, Mulcahy G, Duffey K, Wickramasinghe K. 2022. Sugar-sweetened beverage taxes in Europe: learning for the future. Eur. J. Public Health 32:2273–80
     [Google Scholar]
  103. Tversky A, Kahneman D. 1974. Judgment under uncertainty. Science 185:41571124–31
     [Google Scholar]
  104. Vartanian LR, Schwartz MB, Brownell KD. 2007. Effects of soft drink consumption on nutrition and health: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am. J. Public Health 97:4667–75
     [Google Scholar]
  105. Villas-Boas SB, Kiesel K, Berning JP, Chouinard HH, McCluskey JJ. 2020. Consumer and strategic firm response to nutrition shelf labels. Am. J. Agric. Econ. 102:2458–79
     [Google Scholar]
  106. Wang EY. 2015. The impact of soda taxes on consumer welfare: implications of storability and taste heterogeneity. RAND J. Econ. 46:2409–41
     [Google Scholar]
  107. Wansink B, Sobal J. 2007. Mindless eating: the 200 daily food decisions we overlook. Malnutr. Environ. Behav. New Perspect. 39:1106–23
     [Google Scholar]
  108. Ward ZJ, Bleich SN, Long MW, Gortmaker SL. 2021. Association of body mass index with health care expenditures in the United States by age and sex. PLOS ONE 16:e0247307
     [Google Scholar]
  109. Weil D, Grahman M, Archan F. 2013. Targeting transparency. Science 340:61391410–11
     [Google Scholar]
  110. White House 2010. Remarks by the First Lady at a grocery manufacturers association conference Press Release, Off. First Lady, White House Washington, DC: https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/remarks-first-lady-a-grocery-manufacturers-association-conference
  111. WHO (World Health Organ.) 2015. Guideline: sugars intake for adults and children Guideline, World Health Organ Geneva: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241549028
  112. WHO (World Health Organ.) 2022. Noncommunicable diseases Fact Sheet, World Health Organ Geneva: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/noncommunicable-diseases
  113. World Bank 2020. Taxes on sugar-sweetened beverages: international evidence and experiences Rep., World Bank Group Washington, DC:
  114. Yeo GSH. 2022. Is calorie labelling on menus the solution to obesity?. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 18:453–54
     [Google Scholar]
  115. Zimmermann F. 2020. The dynamics of motivated beliefs. Am. Econ. Rev. 110:2337–63
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-resource-111522-111325
Loading
A New Wave of Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Taxes: Are They Meeting Policy Goals and Can We Do Better?
Annual Review of Resource Economics 15, 407 (2023); https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-resource-111522-111325
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-resource-111522-111325
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-resource-111522-111325
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error