1932

Abstract

The community matrix is among ecology's most important mathematical abstractions, formally encapsulating the interconnected network of effects that species have on one another's populations. Despite its importance, the term “community matrix” has been applied to multiple types of matrices that have differing interpretations. This has hindered the application of theory for understanding community structure and perturbation responses. Here, we clarify the correspondence and distinctions among the Interaction matrix, the Alpha matrix, and the Jacobian matrix, terms that are frequently used interchangeably as well as synonymously with the term “community matrix.” We illustrate how these matrices correspond to different ways of characterizing interaction strengths, how they permit insights regarding different types of press perturbations, and how these are related by a simple scaling relationship. Connections to additional interaction strength characterizations encapsulated by the Beta matrix, the Gamma matrix, and the Removal matrix are also discussed. Our synthesis highlights the empirical challenges that remain in using these tools to understand actual communities.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-032416-010215
2016-11-01
2024-06-20
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/ecolsys/47/1/annurev-ecolsys-032416-010215.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-032416-010215&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Abrams PA. 2001. Describing and quantifying interspecific interactions: a commentary on recent approaches. Oikos 94:209–18 [Google Scholar]
  2. Abrams PA. 2009. When does greater mortality increase population size? The long history and diverse mechanisms underlying the hydra effect. Ecol. Lett. 12:462–74 [Google Scholar]
  3. Abrams PA, Matsuda H. 1996. Positive indirect effects between prey species that share predators. Ecology 77:610–16 [Google Scholar]
  4. Allesina S, Pascual M. 2009. Googling food webs: Can an eigenvector measure species' importance for coextinctions?. PLOS Comput. Biol. 5:e1000494 [Google Scholar]
  5. Allesina S, Tang S. 2015. The stability–complexity relationship at age 40: a random matrix perspective. Popul. Ecol. 57:63–75 [Google Scholar]
  6. Attayde JL, Hansson LA. 2001. Press perturbation experiments and the indeterminacy of ecological interactions: effects of taxonomic resolution and experimental duration. Oikos 92:235–44 [Google Scholar]
  7. Aufderheide H, Rudolf L, Gross T, Lafferty KD. 2013. How to predict community responses to perturbations in the face of imperfect knowledge and network complexity. Proc. R. Soc. B 280:20132355 [Google Scholar]
  8. Barabás G, Allesina S. 2015. Predicting global community properties from uncertain estimates of interaction strengths. R. Soc. Interface 12:20150218 [Google Scholar]
  9. Barabás G, Pásztor L, Meszéna G, Ostling A. 2014. Sensitivity analysis of coexistence in ecological communities: theory and application. Ecol. Lett. 17:1479–94 [Google Scholar]
  10. Bender EA, Case TJ, Gilpin ME. 1984. Perturbation experiments in community ecology: theory and practice. Ecology 65:1–13 [Google Scholar]
  11. Berg S, Christianou M, Jonsson T, Ebenman B. 2011. Using sensitivity analysis to identify keystone species and keystone links in size-based food webs. Oikos 120:510–19 [Google Scholar]
  12. Berlow EL, Dunne JA, Martinez ND, Stark PB, Williams RJ, Brose U. 2009. Simple prediction of interaction strengths in complex food webs. PNAS 106:187–91 [Google Scholar]
  13. Berlow EL, Neutel AM, Cohen JE, de Ruiter PC, Ebenman B. et al. 2004. Interaction strengths in food webs: issues and opportunities. J. Anim. Ecol. 73:585–98 [Google Scholar]
  14. Boettiger C, Hastings A. 2013. Tipping points: from patterns to predictions. Nature 493:157–58 [Google Scholar]
  15. Bolnick DI, Amarasekare P, Araújo MS, Bürger R, Levine JM. et al. 2011. Why intraspecific trait variation matters in community ecology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 26:183–92 [Google Scholar]
  16. Burns TP, Rose KA, Brenkert AL. 2014. Quantifying direct and indirect effects of perturbations using model ecosystems. Ecol. Model. 293:69–80 [Google Scholar]
  17. Clark CE, Hallam TG. 1982. The community matrix in three species community models. J. Math. Biol. 16:25–31 [Google Scholar]
  18. Dakos V, Carpenter SR, van Nes EH, Scheffer M. 2015. Resilience indicators: prospects and limitations for early warnings of regime shifts. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 370:20130263 [Google Scholar]
  19. Dambacher JM, Li HW, Rossignol PA. 2002. Relevance of community structure in assessing indeterminacy of ecological predictions. Ecology 83:1372–85 [Google Scholar]
  20. Dambacher JM, Ramos-Jiliberto R. 2007. Understanding and predicting effects of modified interactions through qualitative analysis of community structure. Q. Rev. Biol. 82:227–50 [Google Scholar]
  21. Dambacher JM, Rothlisberg PC, Loneragan NR. 2015. Qualitative mathematical models to support ecosystem-based management of Australia's northern prawn fishery. Ecol. Appl. 25:278–98 [Google Scholar]
  22. De Angelis DL. 1975. Stability and connectance in food web models. Ecology 56:238–43 [Google Scholar]
  23. de Ruiter PC, Neutel AM, Moore JC. 1995. Energetics, patterns of interaction strengths, and stability in real ecosystems. Science 269:1257–60 [Google Scholar]
  24. Doak DF, Estes JA, Halpern BS, Jacob U, Lindberg DR. et al. 2008. Understanding and predicting ecological dynamics: Are major surprises inevitable?. Ecology 89:952–61 [Google Scholar]
  25. Emmerson MC, Raffaelli D. 2004. Predator-prey body size, interaction strength and the stability of a real food web. J. Anim. Ecol. 73:399–409 [Google Scholar]
  26. Flake RH. 1980. Extension of Levins' loop analysis to transient and periodic disturbances. Ecol. Model. 9:83–90 [Google Scholar]
  27. Gao J, Barzel B, Barabási AL. 2016. Universal resilience patterns in complex networks. Nature 530:307–12 [Google Scholar]
  28. Gause GF. 1934. The Struggle for Existence New York: Hafner [Google Scholar]
  29. Haydon D. 1994. Pivotal assumptions determining the relationship between stability and complexity: an analytical synthesis of the stability-complexity debate. Am. Nat. 144:14–29 [Google Scholar]
  30. Hernandez MJ. 2009. Disentangling nature, strength and stability issues in the characterization of population interactions. J. Theor. Biol. 261:107–19 [Google Scholar]
  31. Hernández-Bermejo B, Fairén V. 1997. Lotka-Volterra representation of general nonlinear systems. Math. Biosci. 140:1–32 [Google Scholar]
  32. Higashi M, Nakajima H. 1995. Indirect effects in ecological interaction networks. I. The chain rule approach. Math. Biosci. 130:99–128 [Google Scholar]
  33. Holyoak M, Leibold MA, Holt RD. 2005. Metacommunities: Spatial Dynamics and Ecological Communities Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  34. Iles AC, Novak M. 2016. Complexity increases predictability in allometrically constrained food webs. Am. Nat. 188:87–98 [Google Scholar]
  35. Ives AR, Carpenter SR. 2007. Stability and diversity of ecosystems. Science 317:58–62 [Google Scholar]
  36. Ives AR, Dennis B, Cottingham KL, Carpenter SR. 2003. Estimating community stability and ecological interactions from time-series data. Ecol. Monogr. 73:301–30 [Google Scholar]
  37. James A, Plank MJ, Rossberg AG, Beecham J, Emmerson M, Pitchford JW. 2015. Constructing random matrices to represent real ecosystems. Am. Nat. 185:680–92 [Google Scholar]
  38. Jorgensen J, Rossignol AM, Puccia CJ, Levins R, Rossignol PA. 2000. On the variance of eigenvalues of the community matrix: derivation and appraisal. Ecology 81:2928–31 [Google Scholar]
  39. Laska MS, Wootton JT. 1998. Theoretical concepts and empirical approaches to measuring interaction strength. Ecology 79:461–76 [Google Scholar]
  40. Lawlor LR. 1979. Direct and indirect effects of n-species competition. Oecologia 43:355–64 [Google Scholar]
  41. Lawton JH. 1999. Are there general laws in ecology?. Oikos 84:177–92 [Google Scholar]
  42. Levine SH. 1976. Competitive interactions in ecosystems. Am. Nat. 110:903–10 [Google Scholar]
  43. Levins R. 1968. Evolution in Changing Environments: Some Theoretical Explorations Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  44. Levins R. 1974. The qualitative analysis of partially specified systems. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 231:123–38 [Google Scholar]
  45. Levins R. 1975. Evolution in communities near equilibrium. Ecology and Evolution of Communities ML Cody, JM Diamond 16–50 Cambridge, MA: Belknap [Google Scholar]
  46. Levins R, Schultz BB. 1996. Effects of density dependence, feedback and environmental sensitivity on correlations among predators, prey and plant resources: models and practical implications. J. Anim. Ecol. 65:802–12 [Google Scholar]
  47. Lewontin C. 1969. The meaning of stability. Brookhaven Symp. Biol. 22:13–24 [Google Scholar]
  48. Logofet DO. 1993. Matrices and Graphs: Stability Problems in Mathematical Ecology Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press [Google Scholar]
  49. Logofet DO. 2005. Stronger-than-Lyapunov notions of matrix stability, or how ``flowers'' help solve problems in mathematical ecology. Linear Algebra Appl. 398:75–100 [Google Scholar]
  50. Mason SJ. 1953. Feedback theory—some properties of signal flow graphs. Proc. Inst. Radio Eng. 41:1144–56 [Google Scholar]
  51. Maurer BA. 1999. Untangling Ecological Complexity: A Macroscopic Perspective Chicago: Univ. Chicago Press [Google Scholar]
  52. May RM. 1972. Will a large complex system be stable?. Nature 238:413–14 [Google Scholar]
  53. May RM, MacArthur RH. 1972. Niche overlap as a function of environmental variability. PNAS 69:1109–13 [Google Scholar]
  54. Melbourne-Thomas J, Wotherspoon S, Raymond B, Constable A. 2012. Comprehensive evaluation of model uncertainty in qualitative network analyses. Ecol. Monogr. 82:505–19 [Google Scholar]
  55. Metcalf SJ. 2010. Qualitative models to complement quantitative ecosystem models for the analysis of data-limited marine ecosystems and fisheries. Rev. Fish. Sci. 18:248–65 [Google Scholar]
  56. Montoya JM, Emmerson MC, Solé RV, Woodward G. 2005. Perturbations and indirect effects in complex food webs. Dynamic Food Webs: Multispecies Assemblages, Ecosystem Development, and Environmental Change PC de Ruiter, V Wolters, JC Moore 369–80 Burlington, MA: Academic [Google Scholar]
  57. Montoya JM, Woodward G, Emmerson MC, Solé RV. 2009. Press perturbations and indirect effects in real food webs. Ecology 90:2426–33 [Google Scholar]
  58. Nakajima H. 1992. Sensitivity and stability of flow networks. Ecol. Model. 62:123–33 [Google Scholar]
  59. Nakajima H, Higashi M. 1995. Indirect effects in ecological interaction networks. II. The conjugate variable approach. Math. Biosci. 130:129–50 [Google Scholar]
  60. Neubert MG, Caswell H. 1997. Alternatives to resilience for measuring the responses of ecological systems to perturbations. Ecology 78:653–65 [Google Scholar]
  61. Neutel AM, Heesterbeek JAP, van de Koppel J, Hoenderboom G, Vos A. et al. 2007. Reconciling complexity with stability in naturally assembling food webs. Nature 449:599–602 [Google Scholar]
  62. Neutel AM, Thorne MAS. 2016. Linking saturation, stability and sustainability in food webs with observed equilibrium structure. Theor. Ecol. 9:73–81 [Google Scholar]
  63. Nolting BC, Abbott KC. 2016. Balls, cups, and quasi-potentials: quantifying stability in stochastic systems. Ecology 97:850–64 [Google Scholar]
  64. Novak M, Wootton JT. 2008. Estimating nonlinear interaction strengths: an observation-based method for species-rich food webs. Ecology 89:2083–89 [Google Scholar]
  65. Novak M, Wootton JT. 2010. Using experimental indices to quantify the strength of species interactions. Oikos 119:1057–63 [Google Scholar]
  66. Novak M, Wootton JT, Doak DF, Emmerson M, Estes JA, Tinker MT. 2011. Predicting community responses to perturbations in the face of imperfect knowledge and network complexity. Ecology 92:836–46 [Google Scholar]
  67. Ovaskainen O. 2003. Habitat destruction, habitat restoration and eigenvector–eigenvalue relations. Math. Biosci. 181:165–76 [Google Scholar]
  68. Paine RT. 1969. A note on trophic complexity and community stability. Am. Nat. 103:91–93 [Google Scholar]
  69. Paine RT. 1988. Road maps of interactions or grist for theoretical development?. Ecology 69:1648–54 [Google Scholar]
  70. Paine RT. 1992. Food-web analysis through field measurement of per capita interaction strength. Nature 355:73–75 [Google Scholar]
  71. Petchey OL, Pontarp M, Massie TM, Kéfi S, Ozgul A. et al. 2015. The ecological forecast horizon, and examples of its uses and determinants. Ecol. Lett. 18:597–611 [Google Scholar]
  72. Pilette R, Sigal R, Blamire J. 1987. The potential for community level evaluations based on loop analysis. Biosystems 21:25–32 [Google Scholar]
  73. Pimm SL, Lawton JH. 1977. Number of trophic levels in ecological communities. Nature 268:329–31 [Google Scholar]
  74. Pimm SL, Lawton JH. 1978. On feeding on more than one trophic level. Nature 275:542–44 [Google Scholar]
  75. Polis GA, Anderson WB, Holt RD. 1997. Toward an integration of landscape and food web ecology: the dynamics of spatially subsidized food webs. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 28:289–316 [Google Scholar]
  76. Power ME, Tilman D, Estes JA, Menge BA, Bond WJ. et al. 1996. Challenges in the quest for keystones. BioScience 46:609–20 [Google Scholar]
  77. Puccia CJ, Levins R. 1991. Qualitative modeling in ecology: loop analysis, signed digraphs, and time averaging. Qualitative Simulation Modeling and Analysis PA Fishwick, PA Luker 119–43 New York: Springer-Verlag [Google Scholar]
  78. Reum J, Ferriss B, McDonald P, Farrell D, Harvey C. et al. 2015. Evaluating community impacts of ocean acidification using qualitative network models. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 536:11–24 [Google Scholar]
  79. Richard R, Casas J, McCauley E. 2015. Sensitivity analysis of continuous-time models for ecological and evolutionary theories. Theor. Ecol. 8:481–90 [Google Scholar]
  80. Roberts A, Stone L. 2004. Advantageous indirect interactions in systems of competition. J. Theor. Biol. 228:367–75 [Google Scholar]
  81. Schmitz OJ. 1997. Press perturbations and the predictability of ecological interactions in a food web. Ecology 78:55–69 [Google Scholar]
  82. Searle S. 1966. Matrix Algebra for the Biological Sciences (Including Applications in Statistics). London: Wiley [Google Scholar]
  83. Stone L, Roberts A. 1991. Conditions for a species to gain advantage from the presence of competitors. Ecology 72:1964–72 [Google Scholar]
  84. Takimoto G, Iwata T, Murakami M. 2009. Timescale hierarchy determines the indirect effects of fluctuating subsidy inputs on in situ resources. Am. Nat. 173:200–11 [Google Scholar]
  85. Takimoto G, Miki T, Kagami M. 2007. Intraguild predation promotes complex alternative states along a productivity gradient. Theor. Popul. Biol. 72:264–73 [Google Scholar]
  86. Taylor PJ. 1988. Consistent scaling and parameter choice for linear and generalized Lotka-Volterra models used in community ecology. J. Theor. Biol. 135:543–68 [Google Scholar]
  87. Travis CC, Post WM. 1979. Dynamics and comparative statics of mutualistic communities. J. Theor. Biol. 78:553–71 [Google Scholar]
  88. Valdovinos FS, Ramos-Jiliberto R, Garay-Narváez L, Urbani P, Dunne JA. 2010. Consequences of adaptive behaviour for the structure and dynamics of food webs. Ecol. Lett. 13:1546–59 [Google Scholar]
  89. Vandermeer JH. 1970. The community matrix and the number of species in a community. Am. Nat. 104:73–83 [Google Scholar]
  90. Vandermeer JH. 1975. Interspecific competition: a new approach to the classical theory. Science 188:253–55 [Google Scholar]
  91. Vázquez DP, Ramos-Jiliberto R, Urbani P, Valdovinos FS. 2015. A conceptual framework for studying the strength of plant–animal mutualistic interactions. Ecol. Lett. 18:385–400 [Google Scholar]
  92. Watson J, Estes JA. 2011. Stability, resilience, and phase shifts in rocky subtidal communities along the west coast of Vancouver Island, Canada. Ecol. Monogr. 81:215–39 [Google Scholar]
  93. Wolf C, Novak M, Gitelman AI. 2015. Bayesian characterization of uncertainty in species interaction strengths. PeerJ 3:e1717 [Google Scholar]
  94. Wootton JT. 1994. The nature and consequences of indirect effects in ecological communities. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 25:443–66 [Google Scholar]
  95. Wootton JT, Emmerson M. 2005. Measurement of interaction strength in nature. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 36:419–44 [Google Scholar]
  96. Yeakel J, Stiefs D, Novak M, Gross T. 2011. Generalized modeling of ecological population dynamics. Theor. Ecol. 2:179–94 [Google Scholar]
  97. Yodzis P. 1981. The stability of real ecosystems. Nature 289:674–76 [Google Scholar]
  98. Yodzis P. 1988a. The dynamics of highly aggregated models of whole communities. Community Ecology A Hastings 112–31 New York: Springer-Verlag [Google Scholar]
  99. Yodzis P. 1988b. The indeterminacy of ecological interactions as perceived through perturbation experiments. Ecology 69:508–15 [Google Scholar]
  100. Yodzis P. 1989. Introduction to Theoretical Ecology New York: Harper and Row [Google Scholar]
  101. Yodzis P. 1995. Food webs and perturbation experiments: theory and practice. Food Webs G Polis, KO Winemiller 192–200 New York: Springer [Google Scholar]
  102. Yodzis P. 2000. Diffuse effects in food webs. Ecology 81:261–66 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-032416-010215
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-032416-010215
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error