The Evolution of Performance Management: Searching for Value

Literature Cited

1. Adler S, Campion M, Colquitt A, Grubb A, Murphy K et al. 2016. Getting rid of performance ratings: Genius or folly? A debate. Ind. Organ. Psychol. 9:2219–52
   [Google Scholar]
2. Aguinis H 2013. Performance Management Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall, 3rd ed..
   [Google Scholar]
3. Baldassarre L, Finken B 2015. GE's real-time performance development. Harvard Business Review Aug. 12. https://hbr.org/2015/08/ges-real-time-performance-development
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bartram D 2007. Increasing validity with forced-choice criterion measurement formats. Int. J. Sel. Assess. 15:263–72
   [Google Scholar]
5. Beer M 1981. Performance appraisal: dilemmas and possibilities. Organ. Dyn. 9:324–36
   [Google Scholar]
6. Bernardin HJ, Beatty RW 1984. Performance Appraisal: Assessing Human Behavior at Work Boston: Kent
   [Google Scholar]
7. Blanz F, Ghiselli EE 1972. The mixed standard scale: a new rating system. Pers. Psychol. 25:185–99
   [Google Scholar]
8. Bock L 2015. Work Rules! Insights from Google that Will Transform How You Live and Lead New York: Twelve
   [Google Scholar]
9. Borman WC 1974. The rating of individuals in organizations: an alternate approach. Organ. Behav. Hum. Perform. 12:105–24
   [Google Scholar]
10. Borman WC 1975. Effects of instructions to avoid halo error on reliability and validity of performance evaluation ratings. J. Appl. Psychol. 60:5556–60
    [Google Scholar]
11. Borman WC 1977. Consistency of rating accuracy and rating errors in the judgment of human performance. Organ. Behav. Hum. Perform. 20:238–52
    [Google Scholar]
12. Borman WC, Buck E, Hanson MA, Motowidlo SJ, Stark S, Drasgow F 2001. An examination of the comparative reliability, validity, and accuracy of performance ratings made using computerized adaptive rating scales. J. Appl. Psychol. 86:965–73
    [Google Scholar]
13. Boyatzis RE 1996. Consequences and rejuvenation of competency-based human resource and organization development. Research in Organizational Change and Development 9 RW Woodman, WA Pasmore 101–22 Greenwich, CN: JAI Press
    [Google Scholar]
14. Boyatzis RE 2016. Unleashing the Power of Intentional Change New York: Korn Ferry, Hay Group
    [Google Scholar]
15. Boyatzis RE, Rochford K, Taylor SN 2015. The role of the positive emotional attractor in vision and shared vision: toward effective leadership, relationships, and engagement. Front. Psychol. 6:670
    [Google Scholar]
16. Bracken D, Timmreck C, Church A 2001. Handbook of Multisource Feedback San Francisco: Jossey-Bass
    [Google Scholar]
17. Bridges W, Bridges S 2016. Managing Transitions: Making the Most of Change Boston: Perseus Book Group
    [Google Scholar]
18. Bryant A 2011. Google's quest to build a better boss. New York Times Mar. 12. https://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/13/business/13hire.html
    [Google Scholar]
19. Buckingham M, Goodall A 2015. Reinventing performance management. Harvard Business Review April. https://hbr.org/2015/04/reinventing-performance-management
    [Google Scholar]
20. Burke RJ, Weitzel W, Weir T 1978. Characteristics of effective employee performance review and development interviews: replication and extension. Pers. Psychol. 31:4903–19
    [Google Scholar]
21. Cascio WF 1998. Applied Psychology in Human Resource Management Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall
    [Google Scholar]
22. CEB. 2004. Driving employee performance and retention through engagement: a quantitative analysis of the effectiveness of employee engagement strategies Washington, DC: CEB https://www.stcloudstate.edu/humanresources/_files/documents/supv-brown-bag/employee-engagement.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
23. CEB. 2012. Driving breakthrough performance in the new work environment Washington, DC: CEB http://blueroom.neuroleadership.com/assets/documents/CEB%20-%20Driving%20Breakthrough%20Performance%20in%20the%20New%20Work%20Environment%20-%20Short%20Version.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
24. CEB. 2016. The real impact of eliminating performance ratings: insights from employees and managers Washington, DC: CEB https://www.cebglobal.com/content/dam/cebglobal/us/EN/best-practices-decision-support/human-resources/pdfs/eliminate-performance-ratings.pdf
    [Google Scholar]
25. CEB. 2017. The power of context in driving leader success Washington, DC: CEB https://www.cebglobal.com/corporate-leadership-council/power-of-context-in-driving-leader-success.html
    [Google Scholar]
26. Cederblom D 1982. The performance appraisal interview: a review, implications, and suggestions. Acad. Manag. Rev. 7:2219–27
    [Google Scholar]
27. Church AH, Ginther NM, Levine R, Rotolo CT 2015. Going beyond the fix: taking performance management to the next level. Ind. Organ. Psychol. 8:121–29
    [Google Scholar]
28. Cohen D 2005. The Heart of Change Field Guide: Tools and Tactics for Leading Change in Your Organization Boston: Harv. Bus. Rev. Press
    [Google Scholar]
29. Cooper WH 1981. Ubiquitous halo. Psychol. Bull. 90:218–44
    [Google Scholar]
30. Culbert SA, Rout L 2010. Get Rid of the Performance Review: How Companies Can Stop Intimidating, Start Managing—And Focus on What Really Matters New York: Bus. Plus
    [Google Scholar]
31. Culbertson SS, Henning JB, Payne SC 2013. Performance appraisal satisfaction: the role of feedback and goal orientation. J. Pers. Psychol. 12:189–95
    [Google Scholar]
32. Cunningham L 2015. In big move, Accenture will get rid of annual performance reviews and rankings. Washington Post July 21. http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/on-leadership/wp/2015/07/21/in-big-move-accenture-will-get-rid-of-annual-performance-reviews-and-rankings/?tid=pm_pop_b
    [Google Scholar]
33. Dane E 2011. Paying attention to mindfulness and its effects on task performance in the workplace. J. Manag. 37:997–1018
    [Google Scholar]
34. Dane E, Brummel BJ 2013. Examining workplace mindfulness and its relations to job performance and turnover intention. Hum. Relat. 67:105–28
    [Google Scholar]
35. Daniels AC 2000. Bringing Out the Best in People: How to Apply the Astonishing Power of Positive Reinforcement. New York: McGraw-Hill
    [Google Scholar]
36. Davachi L, Kiefer T, Rock D, Rock L 2010. Learning that lasts through AGES. NeuroLeadership J 3:53–63
    [Google Scholar]
37. DeCotiis T, Petit A 1978. The performance appraisal process: a model and some testable propositions. Acad. Manag. Rev. 3:635–46
    [Google Scholar]
38. DeNisi AS 2006. A Cognitive Approach to Performance Appraisal New York: Routledge
    [Google Scholar]
39. DeNisi AS, Murphy KR 2017. Performance appraisal and performance management: 100 years of progress. ? J. Appl. Psychol. 3:421–33
    [Google Scholar]
40. DeRue DS, Nahgang JD, Hollenbeck JR, Workman K 2012. A quasi-experimental study of after-event reviews and leadership development. J. Appl. Psychol. 97:997–1015
    [Google Scholar]
41. Dubois DD 1993. Competency-Based Performance Improvement: A Strategy for Organizational Change Amherst, MA: HRD Press
    [Google Scholar]
42. Duhigg C 2012. The Power of Habit: Why We Do What We Do New York: Random House
    [Google Scholar]
43. Dunnette MD 1963. A note on the criterion. J. Appl. Psychol. 47:251–54
    [Google Scholar]
44. Drucker PF 1954. The Practice of Management New York: Harper & Row
    [Google Scholar]
45. Effron M, Ott M 2010. One Page Talent Management: Eliminating Complexity, Adding Value Cambridge, MA: Harv. Bus. Press
    [Google Scholar]
46. Ericsson KA, Krampe RT, Tesch-Romer C 1993. The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychol. Rev. 100:363–406
    [Google Scholar]
47. Feldman JM 1981. Beyond attribution theory: cognitive processes in performance appraisal. J. Appl. Psychol. 66:2127–48
    [Google Scholar]
48. Fitts PM, Posner MI 1967. Human Performance Oxford, UK: Brooks/Cole
    [Google Scholar]
49. Gelles D 2012. Mindful Work: How Meditation Is Changing Business from the Inside Out New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt
    [Google Scholar]
50. Gregory JB, Levy PE, Jeffers M 2008. Development of a model of the feedback process within executive coaching. Consult. Psychol. J. 60:142–56
    [Google Scholar]
51. Greguras GJ, Robie C, Schleicher DJ, Goff M 2003. A field study of the effects of rating purpose on the quality of multisource ratings. Pers. Psychol. 56:11–21
    [Google Scholar]
52. Grote RC 1996. The Complete Guide to Performance Appraisal New York: Am. Manag. Assoc.
    [Google Scholar]
53. Guion RM 1961. Criterion measurement and personnel judgments. Pers. Psychol. 4:141–49
    [Google Scholar]
54. Harter JK, Schmidt FL, Hayes TL 2002. Business unit-level relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes: a meta-analysis. J. Appl. Psychol. 87:2268–79
    [Google Scholar]
55. Heath D, Heath C 2010. Switch: How to Change Things When Change Is Hard New York: Broadway Books
    [Google Scholar]
56. Hillgren JS, Cheatham DW 2000. Understanding Performance Measures: An Approach to Linking Rewards to the Achievement of Organizational Objectives Scottsdale, AZ: WorldatWork
    [Google Scholar]
57. Ilgen DR, Feldman JM 1983. Performance appraisal: a process focus. Research in Organizational Behavior 5 L Cummings, B Staw 141–97 Greenwich, CT: JAI Press
    [Google Scholar]
58. Ilgen DR, Fisher CD, Taylor MS 1979. Consequences of individual feedback on behavior in organizations. J. Appl. Psychol. 64:4349–71
    [Google Scholar]
59. Ilgen DR, Peterson RB, Martin BA, Boeschen DA 1981. Supervisor and subordinate reactions to performance appraisal sessions. Organ. Behav. Hum. Perform. 28:3311–30
    [Google Scholar]
60. Institute for Corporate Productivity (i4cp). 2011. Tying pay to performance. i4cp Sept. 8. https://www.i4cp.com/productivity-blog/2011/09/08/companies-tying-employee-pay-to-performance-increases-17-in-last-two-years
    [Google Scholar]
61. Jamieson BD 1973. Behavioral problems with management by objective. Acad. Manag. Rev. 16:496–505
    [Google Scholar]
62. Kantor J, Streitfeld D 2015. Inside Amazon: wrestling big ideas in a bruising workplace. New York Times Aug. 15. https://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/16/technology/inside-amazon-wrestling-big-ideas-in-a-bruising-workplace.html
    [Google Scholar]
63. Kirkland K, Manoogian S 2007. Ongoing feedback, how to get it, how to use it Greensboro, NC: Cent. Creat. Leadersh.
    [Google Scholar]
64. Klein AL 1996. Validity and reliability for competency-based systems: reducing litigation risks. Compens. Benefits Rev. 28:431–37
    [Google Scholar]
65. Kluger AN, DeNisi AS 1996. The effects of feedback interventions on performance: a historical review, meta-analysis and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychol. Bull. 119:254–84
    [Google Scholar]
66. Kotter JP 2007. Leading change: why transformation efforts fail. Harvard Business Review Jan. https://hbr.org/2007/01/leading-change-why-transformation-efforts-fail
    [Google Scholar]
67. Landy FJ, Farr JL 1980. Performance rating. Psychol. Bull. 87:72–107
    [Google Scholar]
68. Landy FJ, Farr JL 1983. The Measurement of Work Performance New York: Academic
    [Google Scholar]
69. Latham G, Wexley K 1977. Behavioral observation scales. J. Appl. Psychol. 30:255–68
    [Google Scholar]
70. Latham GP, Locke EA 2007. New developments and directions for goal-setting research. Eur. Psychologist 123:290–300
    [Google Scholar]
71. Latham GP, Wexley KN, Pursell ED 1975. Training managers to minimize rating errors in the observation of behavior. J. Appl. Psychol. 60:5550–55
    [Google Scholar]
72. Ledford GE, Benson GS, Lawler EE III. 2016. A Study of Cutting-Edge Performance Management Practices: Ongoing Feedback, Ratingless Reviews and Crowdsourced Feedback Scottsdale, AZ: WorldatWork
    [Google Scholar]
73. Locke EA, Latham GP 1990. A Theory of Goal Setting and Task Performance Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall
    [Google Scholar]
74. Locke EA, Shaw KN, Saari LM, Latham GP 1981. Goal setting and task performance, 1969–1980. Psychol. Bull. 90:125–52
    [Google Scholar]
75. London M, Mone EM 2014. Performance management processes that reflect and shape organizational culture and climate. The Oxford Handbook of Organizational Climate and Culture B Schneider, KM Barbera, 79–100 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
76. Lopez FM 1968. Evaluating Employee Performance Chicago, IL: Public Personnel Association
    [Google Scholar]
77. Maier NR 1958. The Appraisal Interview: Objectives, Methods and Skills New York: Wiley
    [Google Scholar]
78. McIntyre RM, Smith DE, Hassett CE 1984. Accuracy of performance ratings as affected by rater training and perceived purpose of rating. J. Appl. Psychol. 69:1147–56
    [Google Scholar]
79. Mosley E 2015. Creating an effective peer review system. Harvard Business Review Aug. 19. https://hbr.org/2015/08/creating-an-effective-peer-review-system?cm_sp=Article-_-Links-_-Top%20of%20Page%20Recirculation
    [Google Scholar]
80. Mueller-Hanson RA, Garza M, Riordan BG 2016. Performance Management Transformation Arlington, VA: CEB
    [Google Scholar]
81. Mueller-Hanson RA, Pulakos ED 2018. Transforming Performance Management to Drive Performance: An Evidence-based Roadmap New York: Routledge
    [Google Scholar]
82. Murphy KR, Balzer WK 1989. Rater errors and rating accuracy. J. Appl. Psychol. 74:619–24
    [Google Scholar]
83. Murphy KR, Cleveland JN 1991. Performance Appraisal. An Organizational Perspective Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon
    [Google Scholar]
84. Murphy KR, Cleveland JN 1995. Understanding Performance Appraisal: Social, Organizational and Goal-Oriented Perspectives Newbury Park, CA: Sage
    [Google Scholar]
85. Murphy KR, Cleveland JN, Skattebo AL, Kinney TB 2004. Raters who pursue different goals give different ratings. J. Appl. Psychol. 89:158–64
    [Google Scholar]
86. Murphy KR, Jako RA, Anhalt RL 1993. Nature and consequences of halo error: a critical analysis. J. Appl. Psychol. 78:218–25
    [Google Scholar]
87. Murphy KR, Martin C, Garcia M 1982. Do behavioral observation scales measure observation. ? J. Appl. Psychol. 67:562–67
    [Google Scholar]
88. Nathan BD, Mohrman AM, Milliman J 1991. Interpersonal relations as a context for the effects of appraisal interviews on performance and satisfaction: a longitudinal study. Acad. Manag. J. 34:2352–69
    [Google Scholar]
89. O'Boyle E, Aguinis H 2012. The best and the rest: revisiting the norm of normality of individual performance. Pers. Psychol. 65:79–119
    [Google Scholar]
90. O'Leary RS, Pulakos ED 2017. Defining and measuring results of workplace behavior. The Handbook of Employee Selection JL Farr, N Tippins 509–29 New York: Psychology Press, 2nd ed..
    [Google Scholar]
91. Patterson DG 1922. The Scott Company graphic rating scale. J. Pers. Res. 1:361–76
    [Google Scholar]
92. Pearce JL, Porter LW 1986. Employee responses to formal performance appraisal feedback. J. Appl. Psychol. 71:2211–18
    [Google Scholar]
93. Pearson CAL 1991. An assessment of extrinsic feedback on participation, role perceptions, motivation, and job satisfaction in a self-managed system for monitoring group achievement. Hum. Relat. 44:5517–37
    [Google Scholar]
94. Pink DH 2009. Drive: The Surprising Truth About What Motivates Us New York: Riverhead Books
    [Google Scholar]
95. Ployhart RE, Weekley JA, Ramsey J 2009. The consequences of human resource stocks and flows: a longitudinal examination of unit service orientation and unit effectiveness. Acad. Manag. J. 52:5996–1015
    [Google Scholar]
96. Pulakos ED 1984. A comparison of rater training programs: error training and accuracy training. J. Appl. Psychol. 69:581–88
    [Google Scholar]
97. Pulakos ED 1986. The development of a training program to increase accuracy with different rating formats. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 38:76–91
    [Google Scholar]
98. Pulakos ED 2009. Performance Management: A New Approach for Driving Business Results Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell
    [Google Scholar]
99. Pulakos ED, Mueller-Hanson RA, Arad S, Moye N 2015. Performance management can be fixed: an on-the-job experiential learning approach for complex behavior change. Ind. Organ. Psychol. 8:51–76
    [Google Scholar]
100. Pulakos ED, Mueller-Hanson RA, O'Leary RS, Meyrowitz MM 2012. Practice Guidelines: Building a High-Performance Culture: A Fresh Look at Performance Management Alexandria, VA: Soc. Hum. Resour. Manag. Found.
     [Google Scholar]
101. Pulakos ED, O'Leary RS 2010. Defining and measuring results of workplace behavior. The Handbook of Employee Selection JL Farr, N Tippins 513–29 New York: Psychology Press
     [Google Scholar]
102. Pulakos ED, O'Leary RS 2011. Why is performance management so broken. ? Ind. Organ. Psychol. 4:2146–64
     [Google Scholar]
103. Rock D 2008. SCARF: a brain-based model for collaborating with and influencing others. NeuroLeadership J 1:44–52
     [Google Scholar]
104. Rock D, Jones B 2015. Why more and more companies are ditching performance ratings. Harvard Business Review Sept. 8. https://hbr.org/2015/09/why-more-and-more-companies-are-ditching-performance-ratings
     [Google Scholar]
105. Rodgers R, Hunter JE 1991. Impact of management by objectives on organizational productivity. J. Appl. Psychol. 76:322–36
     [Google Scholar]
106. Rodgers R, Hunter JE, Rogers DL 1993. Influence of top management commitment on management process success. J. Appl. Psychol. 78:151–55
     [Google Scholar]
107. Saal FE, Landy FJ 1977. The mixed standard rating scale: an evaluation. Organ. Behav. Hum. Perform. 18:19–35
     [Google Scholar]
108. Schippmann JS 1999. Strategic Job Modeling: Working at the Core of Integrated Human Resource Systems Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc.
     [Google Scholar]
109. Schneider RJ, Goff M, Anderson S, Borman WC 2003. Computerized adaptive rating scales for measuring managerial performance. Int. J. Sel. Assess. 11:237–46
     [Google Scholar]
110. Schneier CE, Shaw DG, Beatty RW 1991. Performance measurement and management: a tool for strategy execution. Hum. Resour. Manag. 30:279–301
     [Google Scholar]
111. Scott WD, Clothier RC, Spriegel WR 1941. Personnel Management New York: McGraw-Hill
     [Google Scholar]
112. Smith PC, Kendall LM 1963. Retranslation of expectations: an approach to the construction of unambiguous anchors for rating scales. J. Appl. Psychol. 47:149–55
     [Google Scholar]
113. Smither JW, London M 2009. Performance Management: Putting Research into Action New York: Wiley
     [Google Scholar]
114. Smither JW, London M, Reilly RR 2005. Does performance improve following multisource feedback? A theoretical model, meta-analysis, and review of empirical findings. Pers. Psychol. 58:33–66
     [Google Scholar]
115. Strauss G 1972. Management by objectives: a critical review. Train. Dev. J. 26:10–15
     [Google Scholar]
116. Taylor FW 1911. The Principles of Scientific Management New York: Harper & Brothers
     [Google Scholar]
117. Tziner A, Murphy K 1999. Additional evidence of attitudinal influences in performance appraisal. J. Bus. Psychol. 13:407–19
     [Google Scholar]
118. Viswesvaran C, Ones DS, Schmidt FL 1996. Comparative analysis of the reliability of job performance ratings. J. Appl. Psychol. 81:557–74
     [Google Scholar]
119. Wexley KN, Klimoski R 1984. Performance appraisal: an update. Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management KM Rowland, GD Ferris 35–79 Greenwich, CN: JAI Press
     [Google Scholar]
120. Winters D, Latham GP 2006. The effect of learning versus outcome goals on a simple versus a complex task. Group Organ. Manag. 21:236–50
     [Google Scholar]