1932

Abstract

Self-determination theory (SDT) is a macro theory of human motivation that evolved from research on intrinsic and extrinsic motivations and expanded to include research on work organizations and other domains of life. We discuss SDT research relevant to the workplace, focusing on () the distinction between autonomous motivation (i.e., intrinsic motivation and fully internalized extrinsic motivation) and controlled motivation (i.e., externally and internally controlled extrinsic motivation), as well as () the postulate that all employees have three basic psychological needs—for competence, autonomy, and relatedness—the satisfaction of which promotes autonomous motivation, high-quality performance, and wellness. Research in work organizations has tended to take the perspectives of either the employees (i.e., their well-being) or the owners (i.e., their profits). SDT provides the concepts that guide the creation of policies, practices, and environments that promote both wellness and high-quality performance. We examine the relations of SDT to transformational leadership, job characteristics, justice, and compensation approaches.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113108
2017-03-21
2024-07-23
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/orgpsych/4/1/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113108.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113108&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Adams JS. 1963. Towards an understanding of inequity. J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol. 67:5422–36 [Google Scholar]
  2. Ambrose ML, Kulik CT. 1999. Old friends, new faces: motivation in the 1990s. J. Manag. 23:3231–93 [Google Scholar]
  3. Andreassen CS, Hetland J, Pallesen S. 2010. The relationship between “workaholism”, basic needs satisfaction at work and personality. Eur. J. Pers. 24:13–17 [Google Scholar]
  4. Avolio BJ, Bass BM. 1995. Individual consideration viewed at multiple levels of analysis: a multi-level framework for examining the diffusion of transformational leadership. Leadersh. Q. 6:2199–218 [Google Scholar]
  5. Baard PP, Deci EL, Ryan RM. 2004. Intrinsic need satisfaction: a motivational basis of performance and well-being in two work settings. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 34:102045–68 [Google Scholar]
  6. Bass BM. 1985. Leadership and Performance Beyond Expectations New York: Free Press [Google Scholar]
  7. Bass BM, Avolio BJ. 1995. Transformational Leadership Development: Manual for the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire Palo Alto, CA: Consult. Psychol. Press [Google Scholar]
  8. Baumeister RF, Leary MR. 1995. The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychol. Bull. 117:3497–529 [Google Scholar]
  9. Bono JE, Judge TA. 2003. Self-concordance at work: toward understanding the motivational effects of transformational leaders. Acad. Manag. J. 46:5554–71 [Google Scholar]
  10. Burns JM. 1978. Leadership New York: Harper & Row [Google Scholar]
  11. Cerasoli CP, Nicklin JM, Ford MT. 2014. Intrinsic motivation and extrinsic incentives jointly predict performance: a 40-year meta-analysis. Psychol. Bull. 140:4980–1008 [Google Scholar]
  12. Chemolli E, Gagné M. 2014. Evidence against the continuum structure underlying motivation measures derived from self-determination theory. Psychol. Assess. 26:2575–85 [Google Scholar]
  13. Chirkov V, Ryan RM, Kim Y, Kaplan U. 2003. Differentiating autonomy from individualism and independence: a self-determination theory perspective on internalization of cultural orientations and well-being. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 84:197–110 [Google Scholar]
  14. Colquitt JA. 2001. On the dimensionality of organizational justice: a construct validation of a measure. J. Appl. Psychol. 86:3386–400 [Google Scholar]
  15. Conchie SM. 2013. Transformational leadership, intrinsic motivation, and trust: a moderated-mediated model of workplace safety. J. Occup. Health Psychol. 18:2198–210 [Google Scholar]
  16. de Charms R. 1968. Personal Causation New York: Academic [Google Scholar]
  17. Deci EL. 1971. Effects of externally mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 18:1105–15 [Google Scholar]
  18. Deci EL. 1972. The effects of contingent and noncontingent rewards and controls on intrinsic motivation. Organ. Behav. Hum. Perform. 8:2217–29 [Google Scholar]
  19. Deci EL, Connell JP, Ryan RM. 1989. Self-determination in a work organization. J. Appl. Psychol. 74:4580–90 [Google Scholar]
  20. Deci EL, Koestner R, Ryan RM. 1999. A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychol. Bull. 125:6627–68 [Google Scholar]
  21. Deci EL, Ryan RM. 1980. The Empirical Exploration of Intrinsic Motivational Processes New York: Academic [Google Scholar]
  22. Deci EL, Ryan RM. 1985a. Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior New York: Plenum Press [Google Scholar]
  23. Deci EL, Ryan RM. 1985b. The general causality orientations scale: self-determination in personality. J. Res. Pers. 19:2109–34 [Google Scholar]
  24. Deci EL, Ryan RM. 2000. The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychol. Inq. 11:4227–68 [Google Scholar]
  25. Deci EL, Ryan RM, Gagné M, Leone DR, Usunov J, Kornazheva BP. 2001. Need satisfaction, motivation, and well-being in the work organizations of a former eastern bloc country: a cross-cultural study of self-determination. Pers. Soc. Psychol. B. 27:8930–42 [Google Scholar]
  26. De Cooman R, Stynen D, Van Den Broeck A, Sels L, De Witte H. 2013. How job characteristics relate to need satisfaction and autonomous motivation: implications for work effort. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 43:61342–52 [Google Scholar]
  27. Doshi N, McGregor L. 2015. Primed to Perform: How to Build the Highest Performing Cultures Through the Science of Total Motivation New York: Harper Collins [Google Scholar]
  28. Eisenberger R, Cameron J. 1996. Detrimental effects of reward: Reality or myth?. Am. Psychol. 51:111153–166 [Google Scholar]
  29. Fernet C, Austin S, Vallerand RJ. 2012a. The effects of work motivation on employee exhaustion and commitment: an extension of the JD-R model. Work Stress 26:3213–29 [Google Scholar]
  30. Fernet C, Gagné M, Austin S. 2010. When does quality of relationships with coworkers predict burnout over time? The moderating role of work motivation. J. Organ. Behav. 31:81163–80 [Google Scholar]
  31. Fernet C, Guay F, Senécal C, Austin S. 2012b. Predicting intraindividual changes in teacher burnout: the role of perceived school environment and motivational factors. Teach. Teach. Educ. 28:4514–25 [Google Scholar]
  32. Forest J, Gilbert M-H, Beaulieu G, Le Brock P, Gagné M. 2014. Translating research results in economic terms: an application of economic utility analysis using SDT-based interventions. The Oxford Handbook of Work Engagement, Motivation, and Self-Determination Theory M Gagné 335–46 New York: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  33. Foss NJ, Minbaeva DB, Pedersen T, Reinholt M. 2009. Encouraging knowledge sharing among employees: how job design matters. Hum. Resour. Manag. 48:6871–93 [Google Scholar]
  34. Gagné M, Deci EL. 2005. Self-determination theory and work motivation. J. Organ. Behav. 26:4331–62 [Google Scholar]
  35. Gagné M, Forest J, Vansteenkiste M, Crevier-Braud L, Van Den Broeck A. et al. 2015. The multidimensional work motivation scale: validation evidence in seven languages and nine countries. Eur. J. Work Org. Psychol. 24:2178–96 [Google Scholar]
  36. Gagné M, Koestner R, Zuckerman M. 2000. Facilitating acceptance of organizational change: the importance of self-determination. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 30:91843–52 [Google Scholar]
  37. Gagné M, Senècal CB, Koestner R. 1997. Proximal job characteristics, feelings of empowerment, and intrinsic motivation: a multidimentional model. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 27:141222–40 [Google Scholar]
  38. Gerhart B, Fang M. 2015. Pay, intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, performance, and creativity in the workplace: revisiting long-held beliefs. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav. 2:1489–521 [Google Scholar]
  39. Gillet N, Fouquereau E, Forest J, Brunault P, Colombat P. 2012. The impact of organizational factors on psychological needs and their relations with well-being. J. Bus. Psychol. 27:4437–50 [Google Scholar]
  40. Goemaere S, Vansteenkiste M, Van Petegem S. 2016. Gaining deeper insight into the psychological challenges of human spaceflight: the role of motivational dynamics. Acta Astronaut 121:130–43 [Google Scholar]
  41. Grant AM. 2007. Relational job design and the motivation to make a prosocial difference. Acad. Manag. Rev. 32:2393–417 [Google Scholar]
  42. Grant AM, Nurmohamed S, Ashford SJ, Dekas K. 2011. The performance implications of ambivalent initiative: the interplay of autonomous and controlled motivations. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 116:2241–51 [Google Scholar]
  43. Graves LM, Sarkis J, Zhu Q. 2013. How transformational leadership and employee motivation combine to predict employee proenvironmental behaviors in China. J. Environ. Psychol. 35:81–91 [Google Scholar]
  44. Greenberg J. 1987. A taxonomy of organizational justice theories. Acad. Manag. Rev. 12:19–22 [Google Scholar]
  45. Gubler T, Larkin I, Pierce L. 2016. Motivational spillovers from awards: crowding out in a multitasking environment. Organ. Sci. 27:2286–303 [Google Scholar]
  46. Gözükara İ, Simsek OF. 2015. Linking transformational leadership to work engagement and the mediator effect of job autonomy: a study in a Turkish private non-profit university. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 195:3963–71 [Google Scholar]
  47. Hackman JR, Oldham GR. 1980. Work Redesign Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley [Google Scholar]
  48. Hardré PL, Reeve J. 2009. Training corporate managers to adopt a more autonomy-supportive motivating style toward employees: an intervention study. Int. J. Train. Dev. 13:3165–84 [Google Scholar]
  49. Harrison DA, Virick M, Williams S. 1996. Working without a net: time, performance, and turnover under maximally contingent rewards. J. Appl. Psychol. 81:4331–45 [Google Scholar]
  50. Hetland H, Hetland J, Andreassen CS, Pallesen S, Notelaers G. 2011. Leadership and fulfillment of the three basic psychological needs at work. Career. Dev. Int. 16:5507–23 [Google Scholar]
  51. Hon AHY. 2012. Shaping environments conductive to creativity: the role of intrinsic motivation. Cornell Hosp. Q. 53:153–64 [Google Scholar]
  52. Howard JL, Gagné M, Morin AJS, Wang ZN, Forest J. 2016. Using bifactor-exploratory structural equation modeling to test for a continuum structure of motivation. J. Manag. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316645653 [Google Scholar]
  53. Humphrey SE, Nahrgang JD, Morgeson FP. 2007. Integrating motivational, social, and contextual work design features: a meta-analytic summary and theoretical extension of the work design literature. J. Appl. Psychol. 92:51332–56 [Google Scholar]
  54. Jenkins GD, Mitra A, Gupta N, Shaw JD. 1998. Are financial incentives related to performance? A meta-analytic review of empirical research. J. Appl. Psychol. 83:5777–87 [Google Scholar]
  55. Kasser T, Ryan RM. 1996. Further examining the American dream: differential correlates of intrinsic and extrinsic goals. Pers. Soc. Psychol. B. 22:3280–87 [Google Scholar]
  56. Komaki J, Barwick KD, Scott LR. 1978. A behavioral approach to occupational safety: pinpointing and reinforcing safe performance in a food manufacturing plant. J. Appl. Psychol. 63:4434 [Google Scholar]
  57. Kovjanic S, Schuh SC, Jonas K, Quaquebeke NV, Van Dick R. 2012. How do transformational leaders foster positive employee outcomes? A self-determination-based analysis of employees' needs as mediating links. J. Organ. Behav. 33:81031–52 [Google Scholar]
  58. Kuvaas B. 2009. A test of hypotheses derived from self‐determination theory among public sector employees. Empl. Relat. 31:139–56 [Google Scholar]
  59. Kuvaas B, Buch R, Gagné M, Dysvik A, Forest J. 2016. Do you get what you pay for? Sales incentives, motivation, and employee outcomes. Motiv. Emotion. 40:667–80 [Google Scholar]
  60. Landry AT, Kindlein J, Trépanier SG, Forest J, Zigarmi D. et al. 2016. Why individuals want money is what matters: using self-determination theory to explain the differential relationship between motives for making money and employee psychological health. Motiv. Emotion. 40:2226–42 [Google Scholar]
  61. Levesque M, Blais MR, Hess U. 2004. Motivation, discretionary organisational attitudes and well-being in an African environment: When does duty call. Can. J. Behav. Sci. 36:4321–32 [Google Scholar]
  62. Lian H, Lance Ferris D, Brown DJ. 2012. Does taking the good with the bad make things worse? How abusive supervision and leader–member exchange interact to impact need satisfaction and organizational deviance. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 117:141–52 [Google Scholar]
  63. Liu D, Zhang S, Wang L, Lee TW. 2011. The effects of autonomy and empowerment on employee turnover: test of a multilevel model in teams. J. Appl. Psychol. 96:61305–316 [Google Scholar]
  64. Lynch MF, Plant RW, Ryan RM. 2005. Psychological needs and threat to safety: implications for staff and patients in a psychiatric hospital for youth. Prof. Psychol. Res. Pr. 36:4415–25 [Google Scholar]
  65. Mackey J, Sisodia R. 2014. Conscious Capitalism Brighton, MA: Harvard Bus. Rev. Press [Google Scholar]
  66. Markus HR, Kitayama S. 1991. Culture and the self: implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychol. Rev. 98:2224–53 [Google Scholar]
  67. McGraw KO. 1978. The detrimental effects of reward on performance: a literature review and a prediction model. The Hidden Costs of Reward: A New Perspective on Human Motivation MR Lepper, D Green 33–60 Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum [Google Scholar]
  68. Millette V, Gagné M. 2008. Designing volunteers' tasks to maximize motivation, satisfaction and performance: the impact of job characteristics on volunteer engagement. Motiv. Emotion. 32:111–22 [Google Scholar]
  69. Moreau E, Mageau G. 2012. The importance of perceived autonomy support for the psychological health and work satisfaction of health professionals: Not only supervisors count, colleagues too!. Motiv. Emotion. 36:3268–86 [Google Scholar]
  70. Morgeson FP, Campion MA. 2003. Work design. Handbook of Psychology: Industrial and Organizational Psychology 12 WC Borman, DR Ilgen, RJ Klimoski 423–52 Hoboken, NJ: Wiley [Google Scholar]
  71. Morgeson FP, Humphrey SE. 2006. The Work Design Questionnaire (WDQ): developing and validating a comprehensive measure for assessing job design and the nature of work. J. Appl. Psychol. 91:61321–39 [Google Scholar]
  72. Nie Y, Chua BL, Yeung AS, Ryan RM, Chan WY. 2015. The importance of autonomy support and the mediating role of work motivation for well-being: testing self-determination theory in a Chinese work organisation. Int. J. Psychol. 50:4245–55 [Google Scholar]
  73. Olafsen AH, Halvari H, Forest J, Deci EL. 2015. Show them the money? The role of pay, managerial need support, and justice in a self-determination theory model of intrinsic work motivation. Scand. J. Psychol. 56:4447–57 [Google Scholar]
  74. Otis N, Pelletier LG. 2005. A motivational model of daily hassles, physical symptoms, and future work intentions among police officers. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 35:102193–214 [Google Scholar]
  75. Parker SK. 2014. Beyond motivation: job and work design for development, health, ambidexterity, and more. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 65:1661–91 [Google Scholar]
  76. Pink D. 2009. Drive New York: Riverhead Books [Google Scholar]
  77. Preenen PTY, Oeij PRA, Dhondt S, Kraan KO, Jansen E. 2016. Why job autonomy matters for young companies’ performance: company maturity as a moderator between job autonomy and company performance. World Rev. Enterp. Manag. Sustain. Dev. 12:174–100 [Google Scholar]
  78. Richer SF, Blanchard C, Vallerand RJ. 2002. A motivational model of work turnover. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 32:102089–113 [Google Scholar]
  79. Roche M, Haar JM. 2013. A metamodel approach towards self-determination theory: a study of New Zealand managers' organisational citizenship behaviours. Int. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 24:183397–417 [Google Scholar]
  80. Ross M. 1975. Salience of reward and intrinsic motivation. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 32:2245–54 [Google Scholar]
  81. Roth G, Assor A, Kanat-Maymon Y, Kaplan H. 2006. Assessing the experience of autonomy in new cultures and contexts. Motiv. Emotion. 30:4365–76 [Google Scholar]
  82. Ryan RM. 1995. Psychological needs and the facilitation of integrative processes. J. Pers. 63:3397–427 [Google Scholar]
  83. Ryan RM, Bernstein JH, Brown KW. 2010. Weekends, work, and well-being: psychological need satisfactions and day of the week effects on mood, vitality, and physical symptoms. J. Soc. Clin. Psychol. 29:195–122 [Google Scholar]
  84. Ryan RM, Brown KW. 2005. Legislating competence: the motivational impact of high stakes testing as an educational reform. Handbook of Competence AJ Elliot, CS Dweck 354–74 New York: Guilford Press [Google Scholar]
  85. Ryan RM, Connell JP. 1989. Perceived locus of causality and internalization—examining reasons for acting in two domains. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 57:5749–61 [Google Scholar]
  86. Ryan RM, Deci EL. 2000. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am. Psychol. 55:168–78 [Google Scholar]
  87. Ryan RM, Deci EL. 2017. Self-Determination Theory: Basic Psychological Needs in Motivation, Development, and Wellness New York: Guilford [Google Scholar]
  88. Ryan RM, Mims V, Koestner R. 1983. Relation of reward contingency and interpersonal context to intrinsic motivation: a review and test using cognitive evaluation theory. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 45:4736–50 [Google Scholar]
  89. Ryan RM, Sheldon KM, Kasser T, Deci EL. 1996. All goals are not created equal: an organismic perspective on the nature of goals and their regulation. The Psychology of Action: Linking Cognition and Motivation to Behavior PM Gollwitzer, JA Bargh 7–26 New York: Guilford Press [Google Scholar]
  90. Schreurs B, Van Emmerik IJH, Van Den Broeck A, Guenter H. 2014. Work values and work engagement within teams: the mediating role of need satisfaction. Group Dyn 18:4267–81 [Google Scholar]
  91. Sheldon KM, Krieger LS. 2014. Service job lawyers are happier than money job lawyers, despite their lower income. J. Posit. Psychol. 90:3219–26 [Google Scholar]
  92. Sheldon KM, Ryan RM, Deci EL, Kasser T. 2004. The independent effects of goal contents and motives on well-being: It's both what you pursue and why you pursue it. Pers. Soc. Psychol. B. 30:4475–86 [Google Scholar]
  93. Trépanier SG, Fernet C, Austin S. 2012. Social and motivational antecedents of perceptions of transformational leadership: a self-determination theory perspective. Can. J. Behav. Sci. 44:4272–77 [Google Scholar]
  94. Trépanier SG, Fernet C, Austin S. 2013a. The moderating role of autonomous motivation in the job demands-strain relation: a two sample study. Motiv. Emotion. 37:193–105 [Google Scholar]
  95. Trépanier SG, Fernet C, Austin S. 2013b. Workplace bullying and psychological health at work: the mediating role of satisfaction of needs for autonomy, competence and relatedness. Work Stress 27:2123–40 [Google Scholar]
  96. Van Den Broeck A, Ferris DL, Chang C-H, Rosen CC. 2016. A review of self-determination theory's basic psychological needs at work. J. Manag. 42:1195–229 [Google Scholar]
  97. Van Den Broeck A, Van Ruysseveldt J, Smulders P, De Witte H. 2011. Does an intrinsic work value orientation strengthen the impact of job resources? A perspective from the job demands–resources model. Eur. J. Work Org. Psychol. 20:5581–609 [Google Scholar]
  98. Van Den Broeck A, Vansteenkiste M, De Witte H, Lens W. 2008. Explaining the relationships between job characteristics, burnout, and engagement: The role of basic psychological need satisfaction. Work Stress 22:3277–94 [Google Scholar]
  99. Van Den Broeck A, Vansteenkiste M, Lens W, De Witte H. 2010. Unemployed individuals’ work values and job flexibility: an explanation from expectancy-value theory and self-determination theory. Appl. Psychol. Crim. Justice 59:2296–317 [Google Scholar]
  100. Vander Elst T, Van Den Broeck A, De Witte H, De Cuyper N. 2012. The mediating role of frustration of psychological needs in the relationship between job insecurity and work-related well-being. Work Stress 26:3252–71 [Google Scholar]
  101. Vansteenkiste M, Neyrinck B, Niemiec CP, Soenens B, De Witte H, Van Den Broeck A. 2007. On the relations among work value orientations, psychological need satisfaction and job outcomes: a self-determination theory approach. J. Occup. Organ. Psychol. 80:2251–77 [Google Scholar]
  102. Wang Z, Gagné M. 2013. A Chinese–Canadian cross-cultural investigation of transformational leadership, autonomous motivation, and collectivistic value. J. Leadersh. Organ. Stud. 20:134–42 [Google Scholar]
  103. Weibel A, Rost K, Osterloh M. 2010. Pay for performance in the public sector—benefits and (hidden) costs. J. Public Admin. Res. Theory 20:2387–412 [Google Scholar]
  104. Weinstein N, Hodgins HS, Ryan RM. 2010. Autonomy and control in dyads: effects on interaction quality and joint creative performance. Pers. Soc. Psychol. B. 36:121603–17 [Google Scholar]
  105. White RW. 1959. Motivation reconsidered: the concept of competence. Psychol. Rev. 66:5297–333 [Google Scholar]
  106. Williams GC, Halvari H, Niemiec CP, Sørebø Ø, Olafsen AH, Westbye C. 2014. Managerial support for basic psychological needs, somatic symptom burden and work-related correlates: A self-determination theory perspective. Work Stress 28:4404–19 [Google Scholar]
  107. Williams GC, McGregor HA, Zeldman A, Freedman ZR, Deci EL. 2004. Testing a self-determination theory process model for promoting glycemic control through diabetes self-management. Health Psychol 23:158–66 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113108
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113108
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error