1932

Abstract

The overarching purpose of this article is to review and synthesize the accumulated evidence that explores the causes and consequences of abusive supervision in work organizations. Our review is organized in three sections. In the first section, we discuss research trends and provide clarification regarding the pressing and not-so-pressing problems with the way that abusive supervision is ordinarily conceptualized and studied. In the second section, we highlight problems and prospects in research on the consequences of abusive supervision. In the third section, we turn our attention to the growing body of research that explores the antecedent conditions and processes that explain when abusive supervision is more or less likely to occur. Throughout the article, we offer an overview of what has been learned over the past 15-plus years and highlight unanswered questions that warrant examination in future studies.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-041015-062539
2017-03-21
2024-06-18
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/orgpsych/4/1/annurev-orgpsych-041015-062539.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-041015-062539&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Aquino K, Grover SL, Bradfield M, Allen DG. 1999. The effects of negative affectivity, hierarchical status, and self-determination on workplace victimization. Acad. Manag. J. 42:260–73 [Google Scholar]
  2. Aryee S, Chen ZZX, Sun L-Y, Debrah YA. 2007. Antecedents and outcomes of abusive supervision: test of a trickle-down model. J. Appl. Psychol. 92:191–201 [Google Scholar]
  3. Bamberger PA, Bacharach SB. 2006. Abusive supervision and subordinates’ problem drinking: taking resistance, stress, and subordinate personality into account. Hum. Relat. 59:723–52 [Google Scholar]
  4. Bandura A. 1973. Aggression: A Social Learning Analysis Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall [Google Scholar]
  5. Bandura A. 1986. Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall [Google Scholar]
  6. Barnes CM, Lucianetti L, Bhave DP, Christian MS. 2015. You wouldn't like me when I'm sleepy: leaders sleep, daily abusive supervision, and work-unit engagement. Acad. Manag. J. 58:1419–37 [Google Scholar]
  7. Barrick M, Mount MK, Li N. 2013. The theory of purposeful work behavior: the role of personality, higher-order goals, and job characteristics. Acad. Manag. Rev. 38:132–53 [Google Scholar]
  8. Bass BM. 2008. The Bass Handbook of Leadership: Theory, Research, and Managerial Applications New York: Free Press [Google Scholar]
  9. Baumeister RF. 1997. Esteem threat, self-regulatory breakdown, and emotional distress as factors in self-defeating behavior. Rev. Gen. Psychol. 1:145–74 [Google Scholar]
  10. Baumeister RF, Bratslavsky E, Muraven M, Tice DM. 1998. Ego depletion: Is the active self a limited resource?. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 75:1252–65 [Google Scholar]
  11. Baumeister RF, Vohs KD, Tice DM. 2007. The strength model of self-control. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 16:351–55 [Google Scholar]
  12. Bennis W. 1989. On Becoming a Leader New York: Basic Books [Google Scholar]
  13. Bies RJ, Tripp TM, Shapiro DL. 2016. Abusive leaders or master motivators? “Abusive” is in the eye of the beholder. Understanding the High-Performance Workplace: The Line Between Motivation and Abuse NM Ashkanasy, RJ Bennett, MJ Martinko 252–76 New York: Routledge [Google Scholar]
  14. Bommer WH, Johnson JL, Rich GA, Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB. 1995. On the interchangeability of objective and subjective measures of employee performance: a meta-analysis. Pers. Psychol. 48:587–605 [Google Scholar]
  15. Brees J, Mackey J, Martinko M, Harvey P. 2014. The mediating role of perceptions of abusive supervision in the relationship between personality and aggression. J. Leadersh. Organ. Stud. 21:403–13 [Google Scholar]
  16. Brees J, Martinko M, Harvey P. 2016. Abusive supervision: subordinate personality or supervisor behavior. J. Manag. Psychol. 31:405–19 [Google Scholar]
  17. Brown ME, Trevino LK, Harrison DA. 2005. Ethical leadership: a social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 97:117–34 [Google Scholar]
  18. Burton JP, Hoobler JM, Scheuer ML. 2012. Supervisor workplace stress and abusive supervision: the buffering effect of stress. J. Bus. Psychol. 27:271–79 [Google Scholar]
  19. Byrne A, Dionisi AM, Barling J, Akers A, Robertson J. et al. 2014. The depleted leader: the influence of leaders’ diminished psychological resources on leadership behaviors. Leadersh. Q. 25:344–57 [Google Scholar]
  20. Campbell WK, Bonacci AM, Shelton J, Exline JJ, Bushman BJ. 2013. Psychological entitlement: interpersonal consequences and validation of a self-report measure. J. Pers. Assess. 83:29–45 [Google Scholar]
  21. Carver CS. 1979. A cybernetic model of self-attention processes. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 37:1251–81 [Google Scholar]
  22. Carver CS, Scheier MF. 1982. Control theory: a useful conceptual framework for personality-social, clinical, and health psychology. Psychol. Bull. 92:111–35 [Google Scholar]
  23. Carver CS, Scheier MF, Weintraub JK. 1989. Assessing coping strategies: a theoretically based approach. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 56:267–83 [Google Scholar]
  24. Chan ME, McAllister DJ. 2014. Abusive supervision through the lens of employee state paranoia. Acad. Manag. Rev. 39:44–66 [Google Scholar]
  25. Cheng BS, Chou LF, Wu TY, Huang MP, Farh JL. 2004. Paternalistic leadership and subordinate responses: establishing a leadership model in Chinese organizations. Asian J. Soc. Psychol. 7:89–117 [Google Scholar]
  26. Cheng CM, Chartrand TL. 2003. Self-monitoring without awareness: using mimicry as a nonconscious affiliation strategy. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 85:1170–79 [Google Scholar]
  27. Christie R, Geis FL. 1970. Studies in Machiavellianism New York: Academic [Google Scholar]
  28. Collins MD, Jackson CJ. 2015. A process model of self-regulation and leadership: how attentional resource capacity and negative emotions influence constructive and destructive leadership. Leadersh. Q. 26:386–401 [Google Scholar]
  29. Courtright S, Gardner R, Smith T, McCormick B, Colbert A. 2016. My family made me do it: a cross-domain, self-regulatory perspective on antecedents to abusive supervision. Acad. Manag. J. 59:1630–52 [Google Scholar]
  30. Cross SE, Hardin EE, Gercek-Swing B. 2011. The what, how, why, and where of self-construal. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 15:142–79 [Google Scholar]
  31. Dansereau F, Graen G, Haga WJ. 1975. A vertical dyad linkage approach to leadership within formal organizations. Organ. Behav. Hum. Perform. 13:46–78 [Google Scholar]
  32. Detert JR, Trevino LK, Burris ER, Andiappan M. 2007. Managerial modes of influence and counterproductivity in organizations: a longitudinal business-unit-level investigation. J. Appl. Psychol. 92:993–1005 [Google Scholar]
  33. Dinh JE, Lord RG, Gardner WL, Meuser JD, Liden RC, Hu J. 2014. Leadership theory and research in the new millennium: current theoretical trends and changing perspectives. Leadersh. Q. 25:36–62 [Google Scholar]
  34. Duffy MK, Ganster DC, Pagon M. 2002. Social undermining in the workplace. Acad. Manag. J. 45:331–51 [Google Scholar]
  35. Duffy MK, Ganster DC, Shaw JD, Johnson JL, Pagon M. 2006. The social context of undermining at work. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 101:105–26 [Google Scholar]
  36. Eissa G, Lester SW. 2016. Supervisor role overload and frustration as antecedents of abusive supervision: the moderating role of supervisor personality. J. Organ. Behav. In press [Google Scholar]
  37. Elias R. 1986. The Politics of Victimization: Victims, Victimology, and Human Rights New York: Oxford Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  38. Farh CIC, Chen Z. 2014. Beyond the individual victim: multilevel consequences of abusive supervision in teams. J. Appl. Psychol. 99:1074–95 [Google Scholar]
  39. Fast NJ, Chen S. 2009. When the boss feels inadequate: power, incompetence, and aggression. Psychol. Sci. 20:1406–13 [Google Scholar]
  40. Ferris GR, Davidson SL, Perrewe PL. 2005. Political Skill at Work: Impact on Work Effectiveness Mountain View, CA: Davies-Black [Google Scholar]
  41. Ferris GR, Zinko R, Brouer RL, Buckley MR, Harvey MG. 2007. Strategic bullying as a supplementary, balanced perspective on destructive leadership. Leadersh. Q. 18:195–206 [Google Scholar]
  42. Festinger L. 1954. A theory of social comparison processes. Hum. Relat. 7:117–40 [Google Scholar]
  43. Frieder RE, Hochwarter WA, DeOrtentiis PS. 2015. Attenuating the negative effects of abusive supervision: the role of proactive voice behavior and resource management ability. Acad. Manag. J. 26:821–37 [Google Scholar]
  44. Ganster DC, Rosen CC. 2013. Work stress and employee health: a multidisciplinary review. J. Manag. 39:1085–122 [Google Scholar]
  45. Garcia PRJM, Restubog SLD, Kiewitz C, Scott KL, Tang RL. 2014. Roots run deep: investigating psychological mechanisms between history of family aggression and abusive supervision. J. Appl. Psychol. 99:883–97 [Google Scholar]
  46. Georgeson J, Harris MJ. 1998. Why's my boss holding me down? A meta-analysis of power effects on performance evaluations. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 3:184–95 [Google Scholar]
  47. Greenbaum RL, Mawritz MB, Mayer DM, Priesemuth M. 2013. To act out, to withdraw, or to constructively resist? Employee reactions to supervisor abuse of customers and the moderating role of employee moral identity. Hum. Relat. 66:925–50 [Google Scholar]
  48. Greenberg J, Scott KS. 1996. Why do workers bite the hand that feeds them? Employee theft as a social exchange process. Research on Organizational Behavior 18 BM Staw, LL Cummings 111–56 Greenwich, CT: JAI Press [Google Scholar]
  49. Hafer CL, Olson JM. 2003. An analysis of empirical research in the scope of justice. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 4:311–23 [Google Scholar]
  50. Hannah ST, Schaubroeck JM, Peng AC, Lord RG, Trevino LK. et al. 2013. Joint influences of individual and work unit abusive supervision on ethical intentions and behaviors: a moderated mediation model. J. Appl. Psychol. 98:579–92 [Google Scholar]
  51. Harvey P, Harris KJ, Gilis WE, Martinko MJ. 2014. Abusive supervision and the entitled employee. Leadersh. Q. 25:204–17 [Google Scholar]
  52. Harvey P, Stoner J, Hochwarter W, Kacmar C. 2007. Coping with abusive supervision: the neutralizing effects of ingratiation and positive effect on negative employee outcomes. Leadersh. Q. 18:264–80 [Google Scholar]
  53. Henle CA, Gross MA. 2014. What have I done to deserve this? Effects of employee personality and emotion on abusive supervision. J. Bus. Ethics 122:461–74 [Google Scholar]
  54. Hobfoll SE. 1989. Conservation of resources: a new attempt at conceptualizing stress. Am. Psychol. 44:513–24 [Google Scholar]
  55. Hoobler JJM, Hu J. 2013. A model of injustice, abusive supervision, and negative affect. Leadersh. Q. 24:256–69 [Google Scholar]
  56. Hoobler JM, Brass DJ. 2006. Abusive supervision and family undermining as displaced aggression. J. Appl. Psychol. 91:1125–33 [Google Scholar]
  57. Hu HH. 2012. The influence of employee emotional intelligence on coping with supervisor abuse in a banking context. Soc. Behav. Pers. 40:863–74 [Google Scholar]
  58. Huo Y, Lam W, Chen Z. 2012. Am I the only one this supervisor is laughing at? Effects of aggressive humor on employee strain and addictive behaviors. Pers. Psychol. 65:859–85 [Google Scholar]
  59. Johnson RE, Venus M, Lanaj K, Mao C, Chang CH. 2012. Leader identity as an antecedent of the frequency and consistency of transformational, consideration, and abusive leadership behaviors. J. Appl. Psychol. 97:1262–72 [Google Scholar]
  60. Kammeyer-Mueller JD, Simon LS, Judge TA. 2016. A head start or a step behind? Understanding how dispositional and motivational resources influence emotional exhaustion. J. Manag. 42:561–81 [Google Scholar]
  61. Khan AK, Moss S, Quratulain S, Hameed I. 2016. When and how subordinate performance leads to abusive supervision: a social dominance perspective. J. Manag. In press [Google Scholar]
  62. Kiazad K, Restubog SLD, Zagenczyk TJ, Kiewitz C, Tang RL. 2010. In pursuit of power: the role of authoritarian leadership in the relationship between supervisors’ Machiavellianism and subordinates’ perceptions of abusive supervisory behavior. J. Res. Pers. 44:512–19 [Google Scholar]
  63. Kiewitz C, Restobug SLD, Zagenczyk TJ, Scott KD, Garcia PRJM, Tang RL. 2012. Sins of the parents: self-control as a buffer between supervisors’ previous experience of family undermining and subordinates’ perceptions of abusive supervision. Leadersh. Q. 23:869–82 [Google Scholar]
  64. Klaussner S. 2014. Engulfed in the abyss: the emergence of abusive supervision as an escalating process of supervisor-subordinate interaction. Hum. Relat. 67:311–32 [Google Scholar]
  65. Lambert LS, Tepper BJ, Carr JC, Holt DT, Barelka AJ. 2012. Forgotten but not gone: an examination of fit between leader consideration and initiating structure needed and received. J. Appl. Psychol. 97:913–30 [Google Scholar]
  66. Lazarus RS, Folkman S. 1984. Stress, Appraisal, and Coping New York: Springer [Google Scholar]
  67. Lee S, Yun S, Srivastava A. 2013. Evidence for a curvilinear relationship between abusive supervision and creativity in South Korea. Leadersh. Q. 24:724–31 [Google Scholar]
  68. Lee TW, Mitchell TR. 1994. An alternative approach: the unfolding model of voluntary employee turnover. Acad. Manag. Rev. 19:51–89 [Google Scholar]
  69. Li Y, Wang Z, Yang L-Q, Liu S. 2016. The crossover of psychological distress from leaders to subordinates in teams: the role of abusive supervision, psychological capital, and team performance. J. Occup. Health Psychol. 21:142–53 [Google Scholar]
  70. Lian H, Ferris DL, Brown DJ. 2012. Does taking the good with the bad make things worse? How abusive supervision and leader-member exchange interact to impact need satisfaction and organizational deviance. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 117:41–52 [Google Scholar]
  71. Lian H, Ferris DL, Morrison R, Brown DJ. 2014. Blame it on the supervisor or the subordinate? Reciprocal relations between abusive supervision and organizational deviance. J. Appl. Psychol. 99:651–64 [Google Scholar]
  72. Liang LH, Lian H, Brown DJ, Ferris DL, Hanig S, Keeping LM. 2016. Why are abusive supervisors abusive? A dual-system self-control model. Acad. Manag. J. 59:1385–406 [Google Scholar]
  73. Liden RC, Sparrowe RT, Wayne SJ. 1997. Leader-member exchange theory: the past and potential for the future. Res. Pers. Hum. Resour. Manag. 15:47–120 [Google Scholar]
  74. Lin S, Ma J, Johnson RE. 2016. When ethical leader behavior breaks bad: how ethical leader behavior can turn abusive via ego depletion and moral licensing. J. Appl. Psychol. 101:815–30 [Google Scholar]
  75. Liu D, Liao H, Loi R. 2012. The dark side of leadership: a three-level investigation of the cascading effect of abusive supervision on employee creativity. Acad. Manag. J. 55:1187–212 [Google Scholar]
  76. Longino H. 1990. Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press [Google Scholar]
  77. Mackey JD, Ellen BP, Hochwarter WA, Ferris GR. 2013. Subordinate social adaptability and the consequences of abusive supervision perceptions in two samples. Leadersh. Q. 24:732–46 [Google Scholar]
  78. Mackey JD, Frieder RE, Brees JR, Martinko MJ. 2015. Abusive supervision: a meta-analysis and empirical review. J. Manag 2015:0149206315573997 [Google Scholar]
  79. Magley VJ, Hulin CL, Fitzgerald LF, DeNardo M. 1999. Outcomes of self-labeling sexual harassment. J. Appl. Psychol. 84:390–402 [Google Scholar]
  80. Marcinko R. 1997. Leadership Secrets of the Rogue Warrior: A Commando's Guide to Success New York: Pocket Books [Google Scholar]
  81. Martinko MJ, Harvey P, Brees JR, Mackey J. 2013. A review of abusive supervision research. J. Organ. Behav. 34:120–37 [Google Scholar]
  82. Martinko MJ, Harvey P, Sikora D, Douglas SC. 2011. Perceptions of abusive supervision: the role of subordinates’ attribution styles. Leadersh. Q. 22:751–64 [Google Scholar]
  83. Mawritz MB, Dust SB, Resick CJ. 2014a. Hostile climate, abusive supervision, and employee coping: Does conscientiousness matter. J. Appl. Psychol. 99:737–47 [Google Scholar]
  84. Mawritz MB, Folger R, Latham G. 2014b. Supervisors’ exceedingly difficult goals and abusive supervision: the mediating effects of hindrance stress, anger, and anxiety. J. Organ. Behav. 35:358–72 [Google Scholar]
  85. Mawritz MB, Mayer DM, Hoobler JM, Wayne SJ, Marinova SV. 2012. A trickle-down model of abusive supervision. Pers. Psychol. 65:325–57 [Google Scholar]
  86. Mayer DM, Thau S, Workman KM, Van Dijke M, De Cremer D. 2012. Leader mistreatment, employee hostility, and deviant behaviors: integrating self-uncertainty and thwarted needs perspectives on deviance. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 117:24–40 [Google Scholar]
  87. Melwani S, Barsade SG. 2011. Held in contempt: the psychological, interpersonal, and performance consequences of contempt in a work context. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 101:503–20 [Google Scholar]
  88. Mitchell MS, Ambrose ML. 2007. Abusive supervision and workplace deviance and the moderating effects of negative reciprocity beliefs. J. Appl. Psychol. 92:1159–68 [Google Scholar]
  89. Munson LJ, Miner AG, Hulin C. 2001. Labeling sexual harassment in the military: an extension and replication. J. Appl. Psychol. 86:293–303 [Google Scholar]
  90. Muraven M, Baumeister RF. 2000. Self-regulation and depletion of limited resources: Does self-control resemble a muscle. Psychol. Bull. 126:247–59 [Google Scholar]
  91. Nandkeolyar AK, Shaffer JA, Li A, Ekkirala S, Bagger J. 2014. Surviving an abusive supervisor: the joint roles of conscientiousness and coping strategies. J. Appl. Psychol. 99:138–50 [Google Scholar]
  92. Neves P. 2014. Taking it out on survivors: submissive employees, downsizing, and abusive supervision. J. Occup. Organ. Psychol. 87:507–34 [Google Scholar]
  93. Olweus D. 1978. Aggression in Schools: Bullies and Whipping Boys Washington, DC: Hemisphere [Google Scholar]
  94. Opotow S. 1995. Drawing the line: social categorization, moral exclusion, and the scope of justice. Conflict, Cooperation, and Justice: Essays Inspired by the Work of Morton Deutsch B Bunker, J Rubin 347–69 San Francisco: Jossey-Bass [Google Scholar]
  95. Peng AC, Schaubroeck JM, Li Y. 2014. Social exchange implications of own coworkers’ experiences of supervisory abuse. Acad. Manag. J. 57:1385–405 [Google Scholar]
  96. Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Podsakoff NP, Lee JY. 2003. The mismeasure of man(agement) and its implications for leadership research. Leadersh. Q. 14:615–56 [Google Scholar]
  97. Porath CL, Erez A. 2007. Does rudeness really matter? The effects of rudeness on task performance and helpfulness. Acad. Manag. J. 50:1181–97 [Google Scholar]
  98. Priesemuth M, Schminke M, Ambrose ML, Folger R. 2014. Abusive supervision climate: a multiple-mediation model of its impact on group outcomes. Acad. Manag. J. 57:1513–34 [Google Scholar]
  99. Pundt A. 2014. A multiple pathway model linking charismatic leadership attempts and abusive supervision. Z. Psychol. 222:190–202 [Google Scholar]
  100. Restubog SLD, Scott KL, Zagenczyk TJ. 2011. When distress hits home: the role of contextual factors and psychological distress in predicting employees’ responses to abusive supervision. J. Appl. Psychol. 96:713–29 [Google Scholar]
  101. Rodgers MS, Sauer SJ, Proell CA. 2013. The lion's share: the impact of credit expectations and credit allocations on commitment to leaders. Leadersh. Q. 24:80–93 [Google Scholar]
  102. Schmeichel M, Baumeister R. 2004. Self-regulatory strength. Handbook of Self-Regulation: Research, Theory, and Applications R Baumeister, K Vohs 84–98 New York: Guilford Press [Google Scholar]
  103. Schyns B, Schilling J. 2013. How bad are the effects of bad leaders? A meta-analysis of destructive leadership and its outcomes. Leadersh. Q. 24:138–58 [Google Scholar]
  104. Shoss MK, Eisenberger R, Restobug SLD, Zagenczyk TJ. 2013. Blaming the organization for abusive supervision: the roles of perceived organizational support and supervisor's organizational embodiment. J. Appl. Psychol. 98:158–68 [Google Scholar]
  105. Simon LS, Hurst C, Kelley K, Judge TA. 2015. Understanding cycles of abuse: a multimotive approach. J. Appl. Psychol. 100:1798–810 [Google Scholar]
  106. Skarlicki DP, Folger R. 1997. Retaliation in the workplace: the roles of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice. J. Appl. Psychol. 82:434–43 [Google Scholar]
  107. Smart Richman L, Leary MR. 2009. Reactions to discrimination, ostracism, and other forms of interpersonal rejection: a multimotive model. Psychol. Rev. 116:365–83 [Google Scholar]
  108. Swann WB. 2012. Self-verification theory. Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology P Van Lange, A Kruglanski, ET Higgins 23–42 London: Sage [Google Scholar]
  109. Sy T. 2010. What do you think of followers? Examining the content, structure, and consequences of implicit followership theories. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 11:73–84 [Google Scholar]
  110. Tedeschi JT, Felson RB. 1994. Violence, Aggression, and Coercive Actions Washington, DC: Am. Psychol. Assoc. [Google Scholar]
  111. Tedeschi JT, Norman NM. 1985. A social psychological interpretation of displaced aggression. Adv. Group Process. 2:29–56 [Google Scholar]
  112. Tepper BJ. 2000. Consequences of abusive supervision. Acad. Manag. J. 43:178–90 [Google Scholar]
  113. Tepper BJ. 2007. Abusive supervision in work organizations: review, synthesis, and research agenda. J. Manag. 33:261–89 [Google Scholar]
  114. Tepper BJ. 2015. Interview with Jon Frankel on HBO's Real Sports with Bryant Gumble. Youtube.com March 24. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k3LsyzN18hs [Google Scholar]
  115. Tepper BJ. 2016. Preface. Understanding the High Performance Workplace: The Line Between Motivation and Abuse NM Ashkanasy, RJ Bennett, MJ Martinko xvi–xviii New York: Routledge [Google Scholar]
  116. Tepper BJ, Almeda M. 2012. Negative exchanges with supervisors. Personal Relationships at Work: The Effect of Supervisory, Co-Worker, Team, and Customer and Nonwork Exchanges on Employee Attitudes, Behavior, and Well-Being L Eby, T Allen 67–93 New York: Routledge Press [Google Scholar]
  117. Tepper BJ, Duffy MK, Breaux-Soignet DM. 2011a. Abusive supervision as political activity: distinguishing impulsive and strategic expressions of downward hostility. Politics in Organizations: Theory and Research Considerations G Ferris, D Treadway 191–212 New York: Routledge [Google Scholar]
  118. Tepper BJ, Duffy MK, Henle CA, Lambert LS. 2006. Procedural injustice, victim precipitation, and abusive supervision. Pers. Psychol. 59:101–23 [Google Scholar]
  119. Tepper BJ, Duffy MK, Shaw JD. 2001. Personality moderators of the relationship between abusive supervision and subordinates’ resistance. J. Appl. Psychol. 86:974–83 [Google Scholar]
  120. Tepper BJ, Henle CA, Lambert LS, Giacalone RA, Duffy MK. 2008. Abusive supervision and subordinates’ organization deviance. J. Appl. Psychol. 93:721–32 [Google Scholar]
  121. Tepper BJ, Mitchell MS, Haggard D, Kwan HK, Park H. 2015. On the exchange of hostility with supervisors: an examination of self-enhancing and self-defeating perspectives. Pers. Psychol. 68:723–58 [Google Scholar]
  122. Tepper BJ, Moss SE, Duffy MK. 2011b. Predictors of abusive supervision: supervisor perceptions of deep-level dissimilarity, relationship conflict, and subordinate performance. Acad. Manag. J. 54:279–94 [Google Scholar]
  123. Tepper BJ, Moss SE, Lockhart DE, Carr JC. 2007. Abusive supervision, upward maintenance communication, and subordinates’ psychological distress. Acad. Manag. J. 50:1169–80 [Google Scholar]
  124. Tepper BJ, Simon LS. 2015. Employee maintenance: examining employment relationships from the perspective of managerial leaders. Res. Pers. Hum. Resour. Manag. 33:1–50 [Google Scholar]
  125. Thau S, Mitchell MS. 2010. Self-gain or self-regulation impairment? Tests of competing explanations of the supervisor abuse and employee deviance relationship through perceptions of distributive justice. J. Appl. Psychol. 95:1009–31 [Google Scholar]
  126. Vogel RM, Mitchell MS, Tepper BJ, Restobug SLD, Hu C. et al. 2015. A cross-cultural examination of subordinates’ perceptions of and reactions to abusive supervision. J. Organ. Behav. 36:720–45 [Google Scholar]
  127. Wang G, Harms PD, Mackey JD. 2015. Does it take two to tangle? Subordinates’ perceptions of and reactions to abusive supervision. J. Bus. Ethics 131:487–503 [Google Scholar]
  128. Wang M, Sinclair RR, Deese MN. 2010. Understanding the causes of destructive leadership: A dual process model. When Leadership Goes Wrong: Destructive Leadership, Mistakes and Ethical Failures T Hansbrough, B Schyns 73–97 Charlotte, NC: Inf. Age Publ. [Google Scholar]
  129. Walter F, Lam CK, van der Vegt GS, Huang X, Miao Q. 2015. Abusive supervision and subordinate performance: instrumentality considerations in the emergence and consequences of abusive supervision. J. Appl. Psychol. 100:1056–72 [Google Scholar]
  130. Wang W, Mao J, Wu W, Liu J. 2012. Abusive supervision and workplace deviance: the mediating role of interactional justice and the moderating role of power distance. Asia Pacific J. Hum. Resour. 50:43–60 [Google Scholar]
  131. Wheeler AR, Halbesleben JRB, Whitman MV. 2013. The interactive effects of abusive supervision and entitlement on emotional exhaustion and co-worker abuse. J. Occup. Organ. Psychol. 86:477–96 [Google Scholar]
  132. Whitman MV, Halbesleben JRB, Shanine KK. 2013. Psychological entitlement and abusive supervision. Health Care Manag. Rev. 38:248–57 [Google Scholar]
  133. Wu TY, Hu C. 2009. Abusive supervision and employee emotional exhaustion: dispositional antecedents and boundaries. Group Organ. Manag. 34:143–69 [Google Scholar]
  134. Xu AJ, Loi R, Lam LW. 2015. The bad boss takes it all: how abusive supervision and leader–member exchange interact to influence employee silence. Leadersh. Q. 26:763–74 [Google Scholar]
  135. Yam KC, Fehr R, Keng-Highberger FT, Klotz AC, Reynolds SJ. 2016. Out of control: a self-control perspective on the link between surface acting and abusive supervision. J. Appl. Psychol. 101:292–301 [Google Scholar]
  136. Yukhymenko-Lescroart MA, Brown ME, Paskus TS. 2015. The relationship between ethical and abusive coaching behaviors and student-athlete well-being. Sport, Exercise, Perform. Psychol. 4:36–49 [Google Scholar]
  137. Yukl G, Kim H, Falbe CM. 1996. Antecedents of influence outcomes. J. Appl. Psychol. 81:309–17 [Google Scholar]
  138. Zellars KL, Tepper BJ, Duffy MK. 2002. Abusive supervision and subordinates’ organizational citizenship behavior. J. Appl. Psychol. 87:1068–76 [Google Scholar]
  139. Zhang H, Kwan HK, Zhang X, Wu LZ. 2014. High core self-evaluators maintain creativity: a motivational model of abusive supervision. J. Manag. 40:1151–74 [Google Scholar]
  140. Zhang Y, Bednall TC. 2016. Antecedents of abusive supervision: a meta-analytic review. J. Bus. Ethics 139:455 [Google Scholar]
  141. Zhang Y, Liao Z. 2015. Consequences of abusive supervision: a meta-analytic review. Asia Pac. J. Manag. 32:959–87 [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-041015-062539
Loading
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-041015-062539
Loading

Data & Media loading...

  • Article Type: Review Article
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error